ML19123A217: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Mr. Duke, By letter dated April 22, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML ML19112A214), Public Service Enterprise Group Nuclear, LCC (PSEG, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Hope Creek Generating Station. The proposed amendment would adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR, Revision 2. The proposed amendment revises the Technical Specification safety limit (SL) on minimum critical power ratio to reduce the need for cycle specific changes to the value while still meeting the regulatory requirement for an SL. | Mr. Duke, By letter dated April 22, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML ML19112A214), Public Service Enterprise Group Nuclear, LCC (PSEG, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Hope Creek Generating Station. The proposed amendment would adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR, Revision 2. The proposed amendment revises the Technical Specification safety limit (SL) on minimum critical power ratio to reduce the need for cycle specific changes to the value while still meeting the regulatory requirement for an SL. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
The NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 200 hours to complete. As requested in the LAR, the NRC staff expect to complete this review in approximately 5months, which is September 20, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | The NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::200 hours]] to complete. As requested in the LAR, the NRC staff expect to complete this review in approximately 5months, which is September 20, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
If you have any question, please contact me, James Kim, at James.Kim@nrc.gov or 301-415-4125. | If you have any question, please contact me, James Kim, at James.Kim@nrc.gov or 301-415-4125. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:13, 3 March 2020
| ML19123A217 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 05/03/2019 |
| From: | James Kim Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Duke P Public Service Enterprise Group |
| References | |
| L-2019-LLA-0084 | |
| Download: ML19123A217 (2) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Kim, James Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 10:19 AM To: Duke, Paul R.
Cc: Thomas, Brian J.
Subject:
RE Acceptance Review - Hope Creek, Revise TS to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR (EPID: L-2019-LLA-0084)
Mr. Duke, By letter dated April 22, 2019 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML ML19112A214), Public Service Enterprise Group Nuclear, LCC (PSEG, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Hope Creek Generating Station. The proposed amendment would adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR, Revision 2. The proposed amendment revises the Technical Specification safety limit (SL) on minimum critical power ratio to reduce the need for cycle specific changes to the value while still meeting the regulatory requirement for an SL.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 200 hours8.333 days <br />1.19 weeks <br />0.274 months <br /> to complete. As requested in the LAR, the NRC staff expect to complete this review in approximately 5months, which is September 20, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any question, please contact me, James Kim, at James.Kim@nrc.gov or 301-415-4125.
James Kim, Project Manager Branch 1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 947 Mail Envelope Properties (BN6PR09MB1332950B09943B06F8A240B3E4350)
Subject:
RE Acceptance Review - Hope Creek, Revise TS to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR (EPID: L-2019-LLA-0084)
Sent Date: 5/3/2019 10:19:04 AM Received Date: 5/3/2019 10:19:00 AM From: Kim, James Created By: James.Kim@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Thomas, Brian J." <Brian.Thomas@pseg.com>
Tracking Status: None "Duke, Paul R." <Paul.Duke@pseg.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: BN6PR09MB1332.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2629 5/3/2019 10:19:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: