ML12144A164: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:May 23, 2012 | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITE D S TATE S | ||
NUC LEAR REGULATOR Y C OMMI S SI ON | |||
Arizona Public Service Company P.O. Box 52034, Mail Stop 7602 Phoenix, AZ | RE G IO N I V | ||
1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD | |||
SUBJECT: PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - INITIAL INFORMATION REQUEST FOR NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000528; 05000529; 05000530/2012008 | AR L INGTON , TEXAS 7 60 11 - 4511 | ||
May 23, 2012 | |||
Dear Mr. Edington: | Randall K. Edington, Executive | ||
Vice President, Nuclear/CNO | |||
Arizona Public Service Company | |||
P.O. Box 52034, Mail Stop 7602 | |||
reactor analyst. | Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034 | ||
SUBJECT: PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - INITIAL INFORMATION | |||
Preparation Week: | REQUEST FOR NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES | ||
INSPECTION NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000528; 05000529; | |||
The purpose of the information gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify potential risk-significant components and operator actions. | 05000530/2012008 | ||
information and documentation needed to support the inspection will be identified during the inspection, including interviews with engineering managers, engineers, and probabilistic safety assessment staff. | Dear Mr. Edington: | ||
R. Edington - 2 - | On November 13, 2012, the NRC will begin a triennial baseline Component Design Bases | ||
Inspection at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. A seven-person team will perform this | |||
information necessary for the information gathering visit, general preparation, and sample selection. | inspection using NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.21, "Component Design Bases Inspection." | ||
gathering visit to assist in our selection of components based on available design margin. | The inspection focuses on components, operating experience, and operator actions that have | ||
high risk and low design margins. The samples reviewed during this inspection will be identified | |||
throughout all three onsite weeks for specific documents needed to complete the review of that component/selection. | during an information gathering visit and during the subsequent in-office preparation week. In | ||
concerns are addressed in a timely manner. | addition, a number of operating experience issues will also be selected for review. | ||
The inspection will include an information gathering site visit by the team leader and a senior | |||
documentation database. | reactor analyst. This will be followed by 3-weeks of onsite inspection by the team. The | ||
inspection will consist of five NRC inspectors and two contractors, of which four will focus on | |||
engineering and one on operations. The current inspection schedule is as follows: | |||
Onsite information gathering visit: Week of October 29, 2012 | |||
Preparation Week: November 5, 2012 | |||
Onsite weeks: November 13, 2012 | |||
November 26, 2012 | |||
December 10, 2012 | |||
The purpose of the information gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify | |||
potential risk-significant components and operator actions. The lead inspector will also request | |||
a tour of the plant with members of your operations staff and probabilistic safety assessment | |||
staff. During the onsite weeks, several days of time will be needed on the plant-referenced | |||
simulator in order to facilitate the development of operator action-based scenarios. Additional | |||
information and documentation needed to support the inspection will be identified during the | |||
inspection, including interviews with engineering managers, engineers, and probabilistic safety | |||
assessment staff. | |||
R. Edington -2- | |||
Our experience with these inspections has shown that they are extremely resource intensive, | |||
both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact | |||
on the site and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for information | |||
needed for the inspection. The request has been divided into three groups. The first group lists | |||
information necessary for the information gathering visit, general preparation, and sample | |||
selection. This information should be available to the regional office no later than October 15, | |||
2012. If possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead inspector. Since | |||
the inspection will be concentrated on high risk/low margin components, calculations associated | |||
with your list of high risk components should be available to review during the information | |||
gathering visit to assist in our selection of components based on available design margin. | |||
The second group of documents requested is those items that the team will need access to the | |||
first day of onsite inspection to complete the required inspection samples. The third group lists | |||
information necessary to aid the inspection team in tracking issues identified as a result of the | |||
inspection. It is requested that this information be provided to the lead inspector as the | |||
information is generated during the inspection. Additional requests by inspectors will be made | |||
throughout all three onsite weeks for specific documents needed to complete the review of that | |||
component/selection. It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in | |||
order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or | |||
the onsite portions of the inspection. In order to facilitate the inspection, we request that a | |||
contact individual be assigned to each inspector to ensure information requests, questions, and | |||
concerns are addressed in a timely manner. | |||
During the onsite portion of our inspection, we request that you make available a conference | |||
room large enough to accommodate the inspection team. In that conference room, please | |||
make available a computer with access to a printer, your condition reporting database, and your | |||
documentation database. | |||
The lead inspector for this inspection is Matthew Young. We understand that our licensing | |||
engineer contact for this inspection is Del Elkinton. If there are any questions about the | |||
inspection or the requested materials, please contact the lead inspector at (817) 200-1545 or via | |||
e-mail at matt.young@nrc.gov. | e-mail at matt.young@nrc.gov. | ||
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the | |||
0011. | Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection | ||
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150- | |||
R. Edington - 3 - | 0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a | ||
request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document | |||
displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number. | |||
R. Edington -3- | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be | |||
made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from | |||
the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS). | |||
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the | |||
Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Thomas Farnholtz, Chief | |||
Engineering Branch 1 | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket: 50-528; 50-529; 50-530 | |||
License: NPF-41; NPF-51; NPF-74 | |||
Enclosure: | |||
Component Design Basis Inspection | |||
Document Request | |||
cc w/enclosure: | |||
Electronic Distribution for Palo Verde | |||
R. Edington -4- | |||
Electronic distribution by RIV: | |||
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov) | |||
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov) | |||
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) | |||
DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) | |||
Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov) | |||
Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov) | |||
Senior Resident Inspector (Tony.Brown@nrc.gov) | |||
Resident Inspector (Mica.Baquera@nrc.gov) | |||
Resident Inspector (Dustin.Reinert@nrc.gov) | |||
Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov) | |||
Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov) | |||
Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov) | |||
Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov) | |||
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) | |||
Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov) | |||
Project Manager (Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov) | |||
Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov) | |||
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov) | |||
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov) | |||
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov) | |||
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov) | |||
OEMail Resource | |||
Inspection Reports/MidCycle and EOC Letters to the following: | |||
ROPreports | |||
Only inspection reports to the following: | |||
RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov) | |||
DRS/TSB STA (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov) | |||
SUNSI Review Completed: _Yes_ ADAMS: Yes No Initials: MRY | |||
Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive | |||
MLXXXXXXXXXX | |||
RIV:RI:DRS/EB1 RIV:BC/EB1 | |||
M. Young T. Farnholtz | |||
/RA/ /RA/ | |||
05/21/2012 5/22/12 | |||
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION | |||
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES (CDBI) INSPECTION | |||
Inspection Report: 0500050528/2012008 | |||
0500050529/2012008 | |||
0500050530/2012008 | |||
Information Gathering Dates: October 30 - November 1, 2012 | |||
On-site Inspection Dates: November 13 - 16, 2012 | |||
November 26 - 30, 2012 | |||
December 10 - 14, 2012 | |||
Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21, "Component Design Bases | |||
Inspection" | |||
Lead Inspector/Team Leader: Matthew Young | |||
817-200-1545 | |||
matt.young@nrc.gov | |||
I. Information Requested Prior to the information Gathering Visit (October 15, 2012) | |||
The following information (Section I of this enclosure) should be sent to the Region IV | |||
office in hard copy or electronic format (ims.certrec.com or compact disc, preferred), in | |||
care of Matthew Young, by October 15, 2012, to facilitate the reduction in the items to be | |||
selected for a final list during the preparation week November 5, 2012. The specific | |||
items selected from the lists shall be available and ready for review on the day indicated | |||
in this request. *Please provide requested documentation electronically in "pdf" files, | |||
Excel, or other searchable formats, if possible. The information should contain | |||
descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information | |||
in "lists" should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who | |||
has knowledge of pressurized water reactor technology. If requested documents are | |||
large and only hard copy formats are available, please inform the inspectors, and | |||
provide subject documentation during the first day of the onsite inspection. | |||
1. An excel spreadsheet of equipment basic events (with definitions) including | |||
importance measures sorted by risk achievement worth (RAW) and Fussell- | |||
Vesely (FV) from your internal events probabilistic risk assessment (PRA). Include | |||
basic events with RAW value of 1.3 or greater. | |||
2. Provide a list of the top 500 cut-sets from your PRA. | |||
3. Copies of PRA "system notebooks," and the latest PRA summary document. | |||
4. An excel spreadsheet of PRA human action basic events or risk ranking of | |||
operator actions from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW and FV. Provide | |||
copies of your human reliability worksheets for these items. | |||
-1- Enclosure | |||
5. If you have an external events or fire PSA model, provide the information | |||
requested in items 1-4 for external events and fire. | |||
6. Site top 10 issues list. | |||
7. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with | |||
low design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, | |||
diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated | |||
design heat removal, etc.). | |||
8. List of motor operated valves (MOVs) in the valve program, with design margin and | |||
risk ranking. | |||
9. List of air operated valves (AOVs) in the valve program, with design margin and | |||
risk ranking. | |||
10. List of high risk maintenance rule systems/components and functions; based on | |||
engineering or expert panel judgment. | |||
11. Structure, system and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category. | |||
12. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 2 years. | |||
13. A list of all time-critical operator actions in procedures. | |||
14. A list with description of permanent and temporary modifications sorted by the top | |||
50 components identified in Item 1. | |||
15. List of current "operator work arounds/burdens." | |||
16 List of root cause evaluations associated with component failures or design issues | |||
initiated/completed in the last 5 years. | |||
17. Current management and engineering organizational charts. | |||
18. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station IPE and IPEEE, if available electronically. | |||
19. Mechanical piping drawings for: | |||
Engineered safety features | |||
Emergency core cooling systems | |||
Emergency diesel generators | |||
-2- Enclosure | |||
20. Electrical one-line drawings for: | |||
Offsite power/switchyard supplies | |||
Normal AC power systems | |||
Emergency AC/DC power systems including | |||
120VAC power, and | |||
selected for | 125VDC/24VDC safety class systems | ||
21. List of any common-cause failures of components in the last 3 years. | |||
22. An electronic copy of the licensing basis documents (i.e., Updated Final Safety | |||
Analysis Report, Technical Specifications). | |||
23. An electronic copy of the System Health notebooks. | |||
24. System Description Manuals with simplified drawings of plant systems | |||
II. Information Requested to be Available on First Day of the Onsite Week | |||
(November 13, 2012) | |||
1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the | |||
selected components for the last 5 years. | |||
7. | 2. The corrective maintenance history associated with each of the selected | ||
components for the last 2 years. | |||
3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not | |||
previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also | |||
provide copies of reference material (such as drawings, engineering requests, and | |||
vendor letters). | |||
4. Copies of operability evaluations associated with each of the selected components | |||
and plans for restoring operability, if applicable. | |||
5. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the | |||
selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable. | |||
6. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected | |||
components, if applicable. | |||
7. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for last | |||
3 years (for example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other | |||
vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., as applicable). | |||
8. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective action | |||
documents generated in preparation for the inspection. | |||
9. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years. | |||
-3- Enclosure | |||
10. Procedures used to accomplish selected operator actions. | |||
11. List of licensee contacts for the inspection team with pager or phone numbers. | |||
III. Information Requested to be provided throughout the inspection. | |||
1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams | |||
questions or queries during this inspection. | |||
2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the | |||
status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection | |||
to each team member). | |||
3. Reference materials (available electronically and as needed during all onsite | |||
weeks): | |||
General set of plant drawings | |||
Procurement documents for components selected | |||
Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.) | |||
Vendor manuals | |||
Inspector Contact Information: | |||
Matthew Young | |||
Reactor Inspector | |||
(817) 200-1545 | |||
Inspector Contact Information | |||
matt.young@nrc.gov | matt.young@nrc.gov | ||
Mailing Address: | |||
: | US NRC, Region IV | ||
US NRC, Region IV Attn: | Attn: Matthew Young | ||
1600 East Lamar Blvd | |||
Arlington, TX 76011-4511 | |||
-4- Enclosure | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 04:15, 12 November 2019
ML12144A164 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Palo Verde |
Issue date: | 05/23/2012 |
From: | Thomas Farnholtz Region 4 Engineering Branch 1 |
To: | Edington R Arizona Public Service Co |
References | |
IR-12-008 | |
Download: ML12144A164 (8) | |
See also: IR 05000528/2012008
Text
UNITE D S TATE S
NUC LEAR REGULATOR Y C OMMI S SI ON
RE G IO N I V
1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD
AR L INGTON , TEXAS 7 60 11 - 4511
May 23, 2012
Randall K. Edington, Executive
Vice President, Nuclear/CNO
Arizona Public Service Company
P.O. Box 52034, Mail Stop 7602
Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034
SUBJECT: PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - INITIAL INFORMATION
REQUEST FOR NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES
INSPECTION NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000528; 05000529;
Dear Mr. Edington:
On November 13, 2012, the NRC will begin a triennial baseline Component Design Bases
Inspection at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. A seven-person team will perform this
inspection using NRC Inspection Procedure 71111.21, "Component Design Bases Inspection."
The inspection focuses on components, operating experience, and operator actions that have
high risk and low design margins. The samples reviewed during this inspection will be identified
during an information gathering visit and during the subsequent in-office preparation week. In
addition, a number of operating experience issues will also be selected for review.
The inspection will include an information gathering site visit by the team leader and a senior
reactor analyst. This will be followed by 3-weeks of onsite inspection by the team. The
inspection will consist of five NRC inspectors and two contractors, of which four will focus on
engineering and one on operations. The current inspection schedule is as follows:
Onsite information gathering visit: Week of October 29, 2012
Preparation Week: November 5, 2012
Onsite weeks: November 13, 2012
November 26, 2012
December 10, 2012
The purpose of the information gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify
potential risk-significant components and operator actions. The lead inspector will also request
a tour of the plant with members of your operations staff and probabilistic safety assessment
staff. During the onsite weeks, several days of time will be needed on the plant-referenced
simulator in order to facilitate the development of operator action-based scenarios. Additional
information and documentation needed to support the inspection will be identified during the
inspection, including interviews with engineering managers, engineers, and probabilistic safety
assessment staff.
R. Edington -2-
Our experience with these inspections has shown that they are extremely resource intensive,
both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact
on the site and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for information
needed for the inspection. The request has been divided into three groups. The first group lists
information necessary for the information gathering visit, general preparation, and sample
selection. This information should be available to the regional office no later than October 15,
2012. If possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead inspector. Since
the inspection will be concentrated on high risk/low margin components, calculations associated
with your list of high risk components should be available to review during the information
gathering visit to assist in our selection of components based on available design margin.
The second group of documents requested is those items that the team will need access to the
first day of onsite inspection to complete the required inspection samples. The third group lists
information necessary to aid the inspection team in tracking issues identified as a result of the
inspection. It is requested that this information be provided to the lead inspector as the
information is generated during the inspection. Additional requests by inspectors will be made
throughout all three onsite weeks for specific documents needed to complete the review of that
component/selection. It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in
order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or
the onsite portions of the inspection. In order to facilitate the inspection, we request that a
contact individual be assigned to each inspector to ensure information requests, questions, and
concerns are addressed in a timely manner.
During the onsite portion of our inspection, we request that you make available a conference
room large enough to accommodate the inspection team. In that conference room, please
make available a computer with access to a printer, your condition reporting database, and your
documentation database.
The lead inspector for this inspection is Matthew Young. We understand that our licensing
engineer contact for this inspection is Del Elkinton. If there are any questions about the
inspection or the requested materials, please contact the lead inspector at (817) 200-1545 or via
e-mail at matt.young@nrc.gov.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-
0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document
displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.
R. Edington -3-
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be
made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from
the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the
Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Thomas Farnholtz, Chief
Engineering Branch 1
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket: 50-528; 50-529; 50-530
License: NPF-41; NPF-51; NPF-74
Enclosure:
Component Design Basis Inspection
Document Request
cc w/enclosure:
Electronic Distribution for Palo Verde
R. Edington -4-
Electronic distribution by RIV:
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)
DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)
Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov)
Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov)
Senior Resident Inspector (Tony.Brown@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (Mica.Baquera@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (Dustin.Reinert@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)
Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)
Project Manager (Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov)
Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)
OEMail Resource
Inspection Reports/MidCycle and EOC Letters to the following:
ROPreports
Only inspection reports to the following:
RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov)
DRS/TSB STA (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)
SUNSI Review Completed: _Yes_ ADAMS: Yes No Initials: MRY
Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive
MLXXXXXXXXXX
RIV:RI:DRS/EB1 RIV:BC/EB1
M. Young T. Farnholtz
/RA/ /RA/
05/21/2012 5/22/12
INFORMATION REQUEST FOR PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES (CDBI) INSPECTION
Inspection Report: 0500050528/2012008
0500050529/2012008
0500050530/2012008
Information Gathering Dates: October 30 - November 1, 2012
On-site Inspection Dates: November 13 - 16, 2012
November 26 - 30, 2012
December 10 - 14, 2012
Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21, "Component Design Bases
Inspection"
Lead Inspector/Team Leader: Matthew Young
817-200-1545
matt.young@nrc.gov
I. Information Requested Prior to the information Gathering Visit (October 15, 2012)
The following information (Section I of this enclosure) should be sent to the Region IV
office in hard copy or electronic format (ims.certrec.com or compact disc, preferred), in
care of Matthew Young, by October 15, 2012, to facilitate the reduction in the items to be
selected for a final list during the preparation week November 5, 2012. The specific
items selected from the lists shall be available and ready for review on the day indicated
in this request. *Please provide requested documentation electronically in "pdf" files,
Excel, or other searchable formats, if possible. The information should contain
descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information
in "lists" should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who
has knowledge of pressurized water reactor technology. If requested documents are
large and only hard copy formats are available, please inform the inspectors, and
provide subject documentation during the first day of the onsite inspection.
1. An excel spreadsheet of equipment basic events (with definitions) including
importance measures sorted by risk achievement worth (RAW) and Fussell-
Vesely (FV) from your internal events probabilistic risk assessment (PRA). Include
basic events with RAW value of 1.3 or greater.
2. Provide a list of the top 500 cut-sets from your PRA.
3. Copies of PRA "system notebooks," and the latest PRA summary document.
4. An excel spreadsheet of PRA human action basic events or risk ranking of
operator actions from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW and FV. Provide
copies of your human reliability worksheets for these items.
-1- Enclosure
5. If you have an external events or fire PSA model, provide the information
requested in items 1-4 for external events and fire.
6. Site top 10 issues list.
7. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with
low design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure,
diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated
design heat removal, etc.).
8. List of motor operated valves (MOVs) in the valve program, with design margin and
risk ranking.
9. List of air operated valves (AOVs) in the valve program, with design margin and
risk ranking.
10. List of high risk maintenance rule systems/components and functions; based on
engineering or expert panel judgment.
11. Structure, system and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category.
12. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 2 years.
13. A list of all time-critical operator actions in procedures.
14. A list with description of permanent and temporary modifications sorted by the top
50 components identified in Item 1.
15. List of current "operator work arounds/burdens."
16 List of root cause evaluations associated with component failures or design issues
initiated/completed in the last 5 years.
17. Current management and engineering organizational charts.
18. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station IPE and IPEEE, if available electronically.
19. Mechanical piping drawings for:
Engineered safety features
Emergency core cooling systems
-2- Enclosure
20. Electrical one-line drawings for:
Offsite power/switchyard supplies
Normal AC power systems
Emergency AC/DC power systems including
120VAC power, and
125VDC/24VDC safety class systems
21. List of any common-cause failures of components in the last 3 years.
22. An electronic copy of the licensing basis documents (i.e., Updated Final Safety
Analysis Report, Technical Specifications).
23. An electronic copy of the System Health notebooks.
24. System Description Manuals with simplified drawings of plant systems
II. Information Requested to be Available on First Day of the Onsite Week
(November 13, 2012)
1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the
selected components for the last 5 years.
2. The corrective maintenance history associated with each of the selected
components for the last 2 years.
3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not
previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also
provide copies of reference material (such as drawings, engineering requests, and
vendor letters).
4. Copies of operability evaluations associated with each of the selected components
and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.
5. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the
selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
6. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected
components, if applicable.
7. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for last
3 years (for example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other
vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., as applicable).
8. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective action
documents generated in preparation for the inspection.
9. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
-3- Enclosure
10. Procedures used to accomplish selected operator actions.
11. List of licensee contacts for the inspection team with pager or phone numbers.
III. Information Requested to be provided throughout the inspection.
1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams
questions or queries during this inspection.
2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the
status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection
to each team member).
3. Reference materials (available electronically and as needed during all onsite
weeks):
General set of plant drawings
Procurement documents for components selected
Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.)
Vendor manuals
Inspector Contact Information:
Matthew Young
Reactor Inspector
(817) 200-1545
matt.young@nrc.gov
Mailing Address:
US NRC, Region IV
Attn: Matthew Young
1600 East Lamar Blvd
Arlington, TX 76011-4511
-4- Enclosure