ML090270799: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Bhalchandra Vaidya Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 2:28 PM To: 'Manges Jr, Clair E'; 'Crowthers, Michael H' Cc: Marshall David; Mark Kowal; Karl Feintuch | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Bhalchandra Vaidya Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 2:28 PM To: 'Manges Jr, Clair E'; 'Crowthers, Michael H' Cc: Marshall David; Mark Kowal; Karl Feintuch | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: License Amendment Request Application for Changes to MCPR Safety Limits (TAC NO. ME0067) | ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: License Amendment Request Application for Changes to MCPR Safety Limits (TAC NO. ME0067) | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
PPL Susquehanna, Unit 2. - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: Amendment- Changes to MCPR Safety Limits | PPL Susquehanna, Unit 2. - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: Amendment- Changes to MCPR Safety Limits (TAC NOS. | ||
By letter dated October 30, 2008, you submitted a license amendment request for to change TS 2.1.1.2. Specifically, the proposed amendment will revise Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits for two-loop and single-loop operation. The purpose of this communication is to provide the results of the NRC staff | ME0067) | ||
=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed by Reactor Systems Branch (SRXB) and Nuclear performance and Code Review Branch (SNPB), to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | By letter dated October 30, 2008, you submitted a license amendment request for to change TS 2.1.1.2. Specifically, the proposed amendment will revise Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits for two-loop and single-loop operation. The purpose of this communication is to provide the results of the NRC staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed by Reactor Systems Branch (SRXB) and Nuclear performance and Code Review Branch (SNPB), to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. | |||
This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | |||
The NRC staff from SRXB and SNPB, has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff from SRXB and SNPB, has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | If you have any questions, please contact me. | ||
Bhalchandra K. Vaidya Licensing Project Manager U. S. NRC, NRR/DORL 301-415-3308 (Office) 301-415-1222 (Fax) | |||
Bhalchandra.Vaidya@nrc.gov E-mail Properties | |||
Mail Envelope Properties (1D658D167B82F54585A33C1A31821B6827C1292843) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: License Amendment Request Application for Changes to MCPR Safety Limits (TAC NO. ME0067) Sent Date: | ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: License Amendment Request Application for Changes to MCPR Safety Limits (TAC NO. ME0067) | ||
Sent Date: 01/27/2009 2:28:19 PM Received Date: 01/27/2009 2:27:00 PM From: Bhalchandra Vaidya Created By: Bhalchandra.Vaidya@nrc.gov Recipients: | |||
Created By: | |||
Recipients: | |||
cemanges@pplweb.com ('Manges Jr, Clair E') | cemanges@pplweb.com ('Manges Jr, Clair E') | ||
Tracking Status: None mhcrowthers@pplweb.com ('Crowthers, Michael H') | Tracking Status: None mhcrowthers@pplweb.com ('Crowthers, Michael H') | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Tracking Status: None Mark.Kowal@nrc.gov (Mark Kowal) | Tracking Status: None Mark.Kowal@nrc.gov (Mark Kowal) | ||
Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Karl Feintuch) | Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Karl Feintuch) | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None Post Office: | ||
HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 8015 01/27/2009 Options Expiration Date: | |||
Post Office: | Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:}} | ||
HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov | |||
Files | |||
MESSAGE | |||
Options Expiration Date: | |||
Priority: | |||
Sensitivity: | |||
Latest revision as of 10:37, 14 November 2019
| ML090270799 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 01/27/2009 |
| From: | Bhalchandra Vaidya Division of Operating Reactor Licensing |
| To: | Crowthers M, Manges C Susquehanna |
| vaidya B, NRR/Dorl/lpl1-1, 415-3308 | |
| References | |
| TAC ME0067 | |
| Download: ML090270799 (1) | |
Text
From: Bhalchandra Vaidya Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 2:28 PM To: 'Manges Jr, Clair E'; 'Crowthers, Michael H' Cc: Marshall David; Mark Kowal; Karl Feintuch
Subject:
ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: License Amendment Request Application for Changes to MCPR Safety Limits (TAC NO. ME0067)
SUBJECT:
PPL Susquehanna, Unit 2. - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: Amendment- Changes to MCPR Safety Limits (TAC NOS.
ME0067)
By letter dated October 30, 2008, you submitted a license amendment request for to change TS 2.1.1.2. Specifically, the proposed amendment will revise Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits for two-loop and single-loop operation. The purpose of this communication is to provide the results of the NRC staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed by Reactor Systems Branch (SRXB) and Nuclear performance and Code Review Branch (SNPB), to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required.
This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff from SRXB and SNPB, has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Bhalchandra K. Vaidya Licensing Project Manager U. S. NRC, NRR/DORL 301-415-3308 (Office) 301-415-1222 (Fax)
Bhalchandra.Vaidya@nrc.gov E-mail Properties
Mail Envelope Properties (1D658D167B82F54585A33C1A31821B6827C1292843)
Subject:
ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: License Amendment Request Application for Changes to MCPR Safety Limits (TAC NO. ME0067)
Sent Date: 01/27/2009 2:28:19 PM Received Date: 01/27/2009 2:27:00 PM From: Bhalchandra Vaidya Created By: Bhalchandra.Vaidya@nrc.gov Recipients:
cemanges@pplweb.com ('Manges Jr, Clair E')
Tracking Status: None mhcrowthers@pplweb.com ('Crowthers, Michael H')
Tracking Status: None Marshall.David@nrc.gov (Marshall David)
Tracking Status: None Mark.Kowal@nrc.gov (Mark Kowal)
Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Karl Feintuch)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 8015 01/27/2009 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: