IR 05000244/1981014: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
{{Adams
| number = ML20010H492
| number = ML17258A180
| issue date = 09/09/1981
| issue date = 09/10/1981
| title = IE Insp Rept 50-244/81-14 on 810713-17.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Planning,Preparation & Performance of post-tensioning Tendon Lift Off Test
| title = Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-244/81-14 on 810713-17.No Noncompliance Noted
| author name = Chaudhary S, Tripp L
| author name = Brunner E
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
| addressee name =  
| addressee name = Maier J
| addressee affiliation =  
| addressee affiliation = ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
| docket = 05000244
| docket = 05000244
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = 50-244-81-14, NUDOCS 8109240536
| document report number = NUDOCS 8109240528
| package number = ML17258A181
| package number = ML17258A181
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 4
| page count = 3
}}
}}


Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:,,.
{{#Wiki_filter:SEP io )gs)
..
Docket No. 50-244 XE HQ FILECo~
_
Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation ATTN:
..
Mr. John E. Maier Vice President Electric and Steam Production-89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649 Gentlemen:
- __
Subject:
_
Inspection 50-244/81-14
_
/ i
_ __
~~I j g'ii This refers to the routine announced safety inspection conducted by Mr. S.
-.
-
-
____
.
.
..
.
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report No.


50-244/81-14 Docket No.
Chaudhary of this office on July 13-17, 1981 at Ontario, New York of activities authorized by NRC License No.


50-244 J
DPR-18 and to the discussions of our findings held by Mr. Chaudhary with Mr. B.
License No.


DPR-18 Priority Category C
Snow of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
-
Licensee:
Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, NY 14649 Facility Name:
R.E.Ginna Nuclear Station Inspection at:
Ontario NY Inspection condu ed:
July 13-17,1981 Inspectors:
. [. N/
f F/
!
. K. Chatidhary, Reactor Inspector dhte signed date signed date signed Approved by:
44h[
f!f/
.
1.. E. Trippf, Chief, Materials and
'date signed (
Processes Section, EIB Inspection Summary:
Areas Inspected: An inspection was conducted by a recional based inspector in the areas of planning, preparation, and oerformance of post-tensionino tendon lift-off test. The inspector witnessed several lift-off tests. The itspection involved 50 inspector hours at the plant site and an additional 16 hours off-site at the NRC regional office.


Results: No items of noncompliance were identified.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the Office of Inspection and Enforcement Inspection Report which is enclosed with this letter.


8109240536 810910 gDRADOCK05000g
't<ithin these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
,
Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
..
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _


-..
Within the scope of this inspection, no items of noncompliance were observed.
.
.
-
_
- _ _-_.-
-
- -
_.


..-. --.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
-.


i
If this report contains any information that you (or your con-tractors) believe to be exempt from disclosure under


..
CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within ten (10) days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such information.
.
.
I
-
.
;
-
!
:
DETAILS
.
1.-
I 1.


Persons Contacted
Consistent with section 2.790(b)( 1),
.
any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from public disclosure.
RG&E
,
C. Forbes, Associate Engineer
!
D. Gent, Results & Test Supervisor
!-
*J. Noon, Asst. Superintendent
*B. Snow, Station Superintendent R. Paul, Results & Test
-
'
*J. Lorriza, Results & Test Engineer
*
Gilbert / Commonwealth


J. Fulton, Structural Engineer I
This
K. Murrey, Structural Engineer
~m~ t 5i/i 05000244
*
)
US-NRC
8 ai09ZOI
:
'P PDR~/
*R. P. Zimmerman, Resident Reactor Inspector 0. Rothberg, Structural Engineer, SEB, NRR D.
RI'DETI R':"Tr RI:DETI Chaudhary:h" 8/10/81 RI:DRPI Kister
".FFICNL o9;ORD COPY


Persinko, Stt JCtural Engineer, SEB, NRR (Persons denoted * attended exit interview)
all I
q 2.
! l4


Documents-Reviewed
Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation section further requires the statement to address with specificity the con-siderations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).
!
The inspector reviewed documents and held discussions with cognizant
'
licensee personnel to determine the adequacy of planning, preparations,
'
and the technical requirements for the lift-off test.


The inspector j
The information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavits If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
reviewed the following documer.ts;
,
i RG&E Proc. PT-27.2, Rev. O " Tendon Surveillance Program Following Re-tensioning."


;
The telephone notification of your intent to request withholding, or any request for an extension of the 10 day period which you believe necessary, should be made to the Supervisor, Files Mail and Records, USNRC Region I, at (215) 337-5223.
Inspection and Test Personnel Qualification Sheets i
a)
C. Forbes - 530077 b)
D. R. Gent - 530085
>
c)
G. E. Joss - 530105
;
j d)
R. W. Paul - 530155


RG&E Proc.-A-1102, Rev. 3, " Qualification of. Test Personnel."
No reply to this letter is required; however, should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you ~


'
Sincerely,
p RG&E Proc. A-1101, Rev. 1. " Performance of Tests" (Contractor Test Personnel Qualification 3.1.4.1)
~
'
~
L
E. J. Brunner, Chief Projects Branch No.
$
i i
,
,,e
-,,.
-m,-,,-
.-
,.~-y
.,
., -,.
.~...-,,y---
*,.,, -
,,-,4-----,m-,,-
-, -
w e re.. -, -
r-
-
w.


+,
1, Division of Resident and Project Inspection Enclosure:
,,. _ -,..
Office of Inspection and Enforcement Inspection Report Number 50-244/81-14 cc w/encl:
r
Harry H. Voigt, Esquire Central Records (3 copies)
.--, we i~r
Public Document Room (PDR)
- - -.
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
 
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
-.
State of New York NRC Resident Inspector bcc w/encl:
_
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
.
Chief, Operational Support Section (w/o encl)
.
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
_
_.
 
.
....
.
 
RG&E Proc. A-1701, Rev. 5, "Ginna Records."
 
Q.A. Manual, Sec. 11, Rev. 8, " Test Control."
 
Q.A. Manual, Sec. 7, Rev. 12, " Control of Purchased Material, Equipment, and Services."
 
Q.A. Manual, Sec. 18, Rev. 8, " Audits" Q.A. Procedures Manual, Proc. # QA 1101, Rev. O, " Test Program Require-ments."
 
Based on the review of documents and discussion with licensee personnel, the inspector determined that the technical requirement as specified by RG&E engineering, the test procedure, planning, and preparation for test was adequate. The equipment was calibrated and the test personnel were certified to perform the test.
 
No items of noncompliance were identified.
 
3.
 
Preparation for Tendon Lift-off Test The inspector visually inspected the test setup located at the top of containment building. This test setup was designed to measure lift-off forces in previously selected tendons. The objectives of the lift-off test were to compare two different systems of lift-off force measurement, to compare lift-off forces with those predicted, and to test the 6% overstress effect.
 
The test setup consisted of two different systems; a strain gaged stressing rod, and a pressure gage and effective ram area. The inspector verified that the equipment was calibrated as evidenced by a current calibration sticker on the pressure gage and other equipment. The inspector also verified that an approved test procedure was available at the test location, test personnel were qualified per plant procedure to conduct the test, and the procedure contained suf*icient instructions and details to preclude misunderstanding.
 
No items of noncompliance were identified.
 
4.
 
The Tendon Lift-off Test
.
The inspector witnessed several lift-off tests.
 
In addition to the licensee engineer and test personnel, two engineers from the licensee's consultant, Gilbert Associates, were also present to provide technical support for the tests. The lift-off forces were measured by two independent methods. One method consisted of a strain gaged stressing rod mounted on top of the hydraulic jack with the associated electronic equipment to measure the rod deflection through the strain gage. The other sy, tem utilized a calibrated pressure gage to determine the jack pressure at the lift-off. To determine the lift-off puint, both l
i
-
- -,
--.
-
.
-
-
 
r
....
.
.
 
'
methods relied on 0.035 inch thick feeler shims. After recording all
<
!
the initial readings on the data sheet, the hydraulic jack was loaded to a pressure of 2000 psi and data at this pressure were recorded. The oressure was further increased to 4000 psi and the hydraulic system
;
was inspected for any excessive leakage. The pressure was then further increased until 0.035 inch thick feel shims could be inserted into shim slack at.two equally spaced positions around the shim stack.
 
The pressure was then reduced to 1000 psi or until the feeler shims could not be removed.
 
The pressure was again increased to the point where the feeler shims could be removed from the shim stack. This point was defined as the tendon lift-off point.
 
The inspector verified that during the test the test equipment properly functioned, data were properly recorded, the test personnel were properly qualified to perform the test, and the te: ting operation complied with the procedural requirements imposed by the test procedure and other plan adninistrative procedures.
 
No items of noncompliance were identified.
 
5.
 
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted * in the first paragraph of this report) at the conclusion of the inspection on July 17,-
1981.
 
The inspector summarized the purpose, scope, and findings of this inspection.
 
...
..
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
- _ _ _.
_
_-
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 10:53, 8 January 2025

Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-244/81-14 on 810713-17.No Noncompliance Noted
ML17258A180
Person / Time
Site: Ginna 
Issue date: 09/10/1981
From: Brunner E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Maier J
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
Shared Package
ML17258A181 List:
References
NUDOCS 8109240528
Download: ML17258A180 (3)
v • d • e


Text

SEP io )gs)

Docket No. 50-244 XE HQ FILECo~

Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation ATTN:

Mr. John E. Maier Vice President Electric and Steam Production-89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649 Gentlemen:

Subject:

Inspection 50-244/81-14

/ i

~~I j g'ii This refers to the routine announced safety inspection conducted by Mr. S.

Chaudhary of this office on July 13-17, 1981 at Ontario, New York of activities authorized by NRC License No.

DPR-18 and to the discussions of our findings held by Mr. Chaudhary with Mr. B.

Snow of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

Areas examined during this inspection are described in the Office of Inspection and Enforcement Inspection Report which is enclosed with this letter.

't<ithin these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.

Within the scope of this inspection, no items of noncompliance were observed.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.

If this report contains any information that you (or your con-tractors) believe to be exempt from disclosure under

CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within ten (10) days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such information.

Consistent with section 2.790(b)( 1),

any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from public disclosure.

This

~m~ t 5i/i 05000244

)

8 ai09ZOI

'P PDR~/

RI'DETI R':"Tr RI:DETI Chaudhary:h" 8/10/81 RI:DRPI Kister

".FFICNL o9;ORD COPY

all I

! l4

Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation section further requires the statement to address with specificity the con-siderations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4).

The information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavits If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

The telephone notification of your intent to request withholding, or any request for an extension of the 10 day period which you believe necessary, should be made to the Supervisor, Files Mail and Records, USNRC Region I, at (215) 337-5223.

No reply to this letter is required; however, should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you ~

Sincerely,

~

~

E. J. Brunner, Chief Projects Branch No.

1, Division of Resident and Project Inspection Enclosure:

Office of Inspection and Enforcement Inspection Report Number 50-244/81-14 cc w/encl:

Harry H. Voigt, Esquire Central Records (3 copies)

Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

State of New York NRC Resident Inspector bcc w/encl:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

Chief, Operational Support Section (w/o encl)

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000244/1981014&oldid=5109045"