ML13008A034

Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Appendix B Seismic Walkdown Checklists (Swcs), Boric Acid Transfer Pump. Pages 91 - 181

ML13008A034
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	10/23/2012
From:	Guerra E, Helffrich A Paul C. Rizzo Associates, ABS Consulting, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CH-P-2A, L-12-28
Download: ML13008A034 (91)

Text

Sheet 91 of 439 L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONMILTA-IS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. CH-P-2A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Boric Acid Transfer Pump Location: Bldg. AXLB Floor El. 752 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y Nz of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Only two out of 4 anchors visible (2 are below an insulatedbox over the pump portion). 2-5/8" anchors identified Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x 7 oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? II I I N/A x

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 92 of 439 LŽ(Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

INlk Ss W S & ChONkULTA(S Seismic Walkdown Checkdist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. CH-P-2A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Boric Acid Transfer Pump Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Nozzles are identifiedto be well supported Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 A .;H,/c Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E-7\'(INEEKS 6&CONSULTANIS Sheet 93 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. CH-P-2A Equ ip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Boric Acid Transfer Pump Other supportinig or relevant documents and photos (if any):

rne Name: z-ol-I-I-i3jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2 -6 2 -l-1-13.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 94 of 439 L C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEELS& CONSULTA.1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. CH-P-2A Equ ip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Boric Acid Transfer Pump rile Name: z- i---li-jpeg

Description:

View of component anchorage configuration

L'41r Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINFERS& CONWULTANTI S

Sheet 95 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment IDNo. CH-TK-IA Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Boric Acid Tank Location: Bldg. AXLB Floor El. 752 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one X_ I_ _

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Tank supportedon 4 legs. Each leg anchoredwith 2-1" diam anchor bolts. Thread engagement at one of the anchors is short by -1/2 thread Judged not a concern.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? X Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? X Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? X (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage calculation52233-C-031 confirms configuration Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of xI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 96 of 439 I*--- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINE:RS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment IDNo. CH-TK-1A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Boric Acid Tank Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

[ IQ Paul C. Rizzo ENGINEERS AL Associates, Inc.

CONULTA*T*

Sheet 97 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status: W N U Equipment ID No. CH-TI(-IA Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Boric Acid Tank Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2 -6 1-1-1-14.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID riue iName: Z-02-1-J-14.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 98 of 439

• --Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEES L CO* LuTA2'Ts Status: Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. CH-TK-IA Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Boric Acid Tank File Name: 2-63-1-1-14.jpeg

Description:

View of anchorage detail for a typical tank support

L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEEiRS

& CONS TA&%-TS Sheet 99 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-I Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus Location: Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one X I I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The switchboardis attachedto three sill channels at base with six 1/2" diameter bolts.

The sill channels are anchoredto concretefloor with six 1/2" diameter anchor bolts (2 at front, 2 at middle and 2 at back). Component identified not to be attachedto adjacent DC Battery SWGR No. I panel. No essential relays identified in either of the two panels, and thereforejudged not a concern.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Both SEWS and calc. 52233-C-014 identifyfour attachmentpointsfor this switchboard The referenced calculationconservatively shows anchor bolt adequacy basedon four bolt pattern. Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 100 of 439

'IC' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS4, CONMULTAN"M Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-1 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? X Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, X and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block walls SB-I-II, SB-I-12 andSB-I-13 have been qualifiedperIE 80-11 review.

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x X I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012

/ I.'

Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

[*--- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 101 of 439 ENGINEERS&. CONM1~TAX1' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W* N U Equipment ID No. DC-SWBDI-I Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

1ile Name: 2-01-I I-l-I jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID FIl vile Name: 2-62-1 l-l-2-.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 102 of 439 V6 -' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENINEERG & CONSUILTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-I Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus File Name: 2-63-1 1-1-25 .jpeg

Description:

View of channel mounting base File Name: 2-64-1 l-1-25.jpeg

Description:

General view inside component

L*-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

& CONSWLTAXIS E14GINEERS Sheet 103 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-I Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus I d File Name: 2-94-1 1-1-25.jpeg

Description:

Inside view of back of battery braker File Name: 2-95-11-1-25.jpeg

Description:

One 1/2" diam anchor bolt identified at back of breaker.

0 Sheet 104 of 439 L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEIRS& CONSULTAN1S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-I Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus File Name: 2-96-11-1-25.jpeg

Description:

Inside view from back of switch board File Name: 2-97-1 1-1-25.jpeg

Description:

2 bolts identified at back of switch board.

Sheet 105 of 439 L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEEPS& CONNULMANnh Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Y 0 U Equipment ID No. DC-SWBDI-2 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus Location: Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one X.L.I.J_ I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The switchboardis attached to three sill channels at base with six 1/2" diameter bolts.

The sill channels are anchoredto concrete floor with six 1/2" diameter anchor bolts (2 at front, 2 at middle and2 at back).

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? X Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? X Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? X (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Both SEWS and calc. 52233-C-014 identify four attachmentpointsfor this switchboard. The referencedcalculation conservativelyshows anchor bolt adequacy based on four bolt pattern. Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X II I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 106 of 439 4<- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

SNGINE ad ChciNSUtTASC Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Y 8 U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-2 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x There is a potentialfor seismic interactionidentified between switch boardB V-DC-SWBDI-2 andBattery ChargerBV-BAT-CHGJ-2. Condition Report issuedfor this condition (CR 2012-14321).

Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block walls SB-1-6, SB-1-7 andSB-1-8 have been qualifiedperIE 80-11 review.

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free I x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

I2CQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& ONMLTAN" Sheet 107 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Y U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBD1-2 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-6-1-26.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID V-ile Name: 2-02 I-2ojpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 108 of 439 L[ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& COM MLTAýrs Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Y () U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-2 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus

& V File Name: 2-64-6-1-26.jpeg

Description:

View of flexible lines going though switch board cabinet File Name: 2-73-6-1-26.jpeg

Description:

Inside view from front of component

I ¢---- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 109 of 439 ENGINEMRS& C(OMLTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Y 0 U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-2 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus File Name: 2-94-6-1-26.jpeg

Description:

View of anchorage detail from front of component File Name: 2-95-6-1-26.jpeg

Description:

General view from inside of battery braker taken from the back M

IŽ ŽPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E,(.INE£ER.S& CONSIIXAT$hP Sheet 110 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Y U Equipment ID No. DC-SWBDI-2 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus File Name: 2-96-6-1-26.jpeg

Description:

One 1/2" diam anchor bolt identified at back of breaker.

rue iName: L-Y/-o-i-zo.Jpeg

Description:

View of switchboard anchorage taken from back

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet Ill of 439 ENGINEEP-S

& CON*t ýLTWM*P Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status: Y U Equipment ID No. DC-SWBDI-2 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus File Name: 2-98-6-1-26.jpeg

Description:

General view for inside of switch board taken from back

Sheet 112 of 439 X Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ESs W INEEkS & CONheclTAN(SW Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: () N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-3 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 3 Location: Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one LX I I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The switchboardis attachedto three sill channels at base with six 1/2" diameter bolts.

The sill channels are anchoredto concretefloor with six 1/2" diameteranchor bolts (2 atfront, 2 at middle and 2 at back). Component identified not to be attachedto adjacentDC Battery SWGR No.3 panel. No essential relays identifiedtherefore judged not a concern. DC Battery SWGR No.3 Panel identified to be anchoredwith 2-1/2" diam anchorsatfront and 1-1/2" diam anchor at back ofpanel. Typical configurationfor all SWBD's.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Both SEWS and calc. 52233-C-014 identifyfour attachmentpointsfor this switchboard The referenced calculationconservatively shows anchor bolt adequacy based on four bolt pattern. Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I V' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet 113 of 439 ENGINfERS& COWMITATNVS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-3 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 3 Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x I I Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x I I and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall SB-i-15 has been qualifiedper IE 80-11 review.

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffirich Date: 10/1/2012 10/ 1/20 12 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

Sheet 114 of 439 IXIQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, ECINEERS ic CONSULTANiS Inc.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (9) N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-3 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 3 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-1-1-25.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-25.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

UNGINEERS& CONSULTAN'S Sheet 115 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-3 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 3 File Name: 2-63-1-1-25.jpeg

Description:

View of channel mounting base File Name: 2-73-l-l-25.jpeg

Description:

View of flexible lines going though switch board cabinet

Sheet 116 of 439 Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

M'ENGINEERlS

& CONSULTAXIS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-3 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 3 riie rName: z-yQ-il-I-.z.jpeg

Description:

General view from inside of component taken from the front File Name: 2-95-1-1-25.jpeg

Description:

General view from inside of component taken from the back

L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ESesi Nlk W S & CONhLiTA(SW Sheet 117 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBD1-3 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 3 File Name: 2 1 2 5jpeg

Description:

General view from inside of braker taken from behind File Name: 2 -9 7 1-25.jpeg

Description:

One 1/2" diam anchor bolt identified at back of breaker.

Sheet 118 of 439 IX-Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGCINEE.RS

r. CONSULTANIS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: w N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-3 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 3 File Name: 2-98-1-1-25.jpeg

Description:

Anchorage detail of braker taken from the front

L --- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CO,ýULTANTS Sheet 119 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W1 N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-4 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 4 Location: Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Wi N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The switchboardis attachedto three sill channels at base with six 1/2" diameterbolts.

The sill channels are anchoredto concretefloor with six 1/2" diameter anchorbolts (2 at front, 2 at middle and 2 at back). Component identified to be attachedto adjacent DC Battery SWGR No. 4. Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x I I I I oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x I I I I (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Both SEWS and calc. 52233-C-014 identifyfour attachmentpointsfor this switchboard. The referencedcalculationconservatively shows anchor bolt adequacy based on four bolt pattern. Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 120 of 439 LXYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENG&INEERS

& CUNSULTAN-M Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBD1-4 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 4 Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall SB-1-9 has been qualifiedper 1E 80-11 review.

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/20 12

I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CULNMZTAN"S Sheet 121 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-4 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 4 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-2-1-2-.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID W W File Name: 2-62-2-1-25.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 122 of 439 I ýQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

SNGiNEES & CONSULTAN(S Status: () N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. DC-SWBDI-4 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 4 File Name: 2-63-2-1-25.jpeg

Description:

View of channel mounting base IFile Name: 2-64-2-1-25.jpeg

Description:

View of back entry conduit

4Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 123 of 439 ENGINEERS& CONSUTLTANh" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status: W*1 N U Equipment IDNo. DC-SWBDI-4 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 4 Pile Name: z-/i-L-i-z:).jpeg

Description:

General view of inside of component Pile Name: /--)4-Z-i-/.jpeg

Description:

View of anchorage detail taken from the back

Sheet 124 of 439 I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINERS & CONSULTANTrS Status: (2) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. DC-SWBDI-4 Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125V DC Bus 4 File Name: 2-95-2-1-25.jpeg

Description:

View of base detail for braker section

L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSUlTANTS Sheet 125 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment ID No. EE-P-IA Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Location: Bldg. DGBX Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one X I I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small pump anchoredto concrete pad with 4-1/2" diam anchor bolts with adequate edge distance.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Some minor cracks noticed on concrete pad andjudged acceptable.

Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verifiedper document 52233-C'-007 Anchorage Calc Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 126 of 439 L ) Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENWINEEVS

& CONMULTAN"M Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. EE-P-1A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x 771 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Nozzles are identifiedto be well supported Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

I Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENG;INEERS& CONSUNLTAN Sheet 127 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. EE-P-1A Equ ip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Diesel Gene rator Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-6 I- 1-1 -2u.Jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-20.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EINEIER & CONSULTAYM Sheet 128 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. EE-P-1A Equiip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Diesel Gene rator Fuel Oil Transfer Pump File Name: 2-63-1-1-20.jpeg

Description:

View of component anchroage configuration

LX-Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENG(INFMS & CONSt TAVNIS Sheet 129 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. EE-TK-2) Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EE-EG- I Fuel OilI Day Tank Location: Bldg. DGBX Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

X I I Tank is mounted on bracedsteelframing (iHSS4x4xI/4). Each offour posts are anchoredwith 4-1" diameteranchor bolts.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? X Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? X Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? X (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configurationconfirmed by Draving RS-0019Q Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of xI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 130 of 439 L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGI*ENES & CONSULTAN*TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (W N U Equipment ID No. EE-TK-2A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EE-EG-I Fuel Oil Day Tank Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached piping are rigidly supported Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

Sheet 131 of 439

• QPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONULTANT" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment ID No. EE-TK-2A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EE-EG-I Fuel Oil Day Tank Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

lile Name: 2-I1-2-1-2u.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-2-1-20.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 132 of 439 L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E;INIS COMATTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment ID No. EE-TK-2A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description EE-EG-I Fuel Oil Day Tank File Name: 2-63-2-1-20.jpeg

Description:

View of component anchorage

IŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 133 of 439

& CONM1ThANTS ENGINEEWS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. FCV-ICH-II3A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description Boric Acid to Blender FCV Location: Bldg. AXLB Floor El. 722 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one II x I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Light weight valve mounted on a 1 1/2" diam line.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? X Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? X (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x _ _T potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 134 of 439

[XQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEES & CONSATTANT.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment IDNo. FCV-ICH-113A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description Boric Acid to Blender FCV Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached linesfound with adequateflexibility.

Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

LN V Paul C.& Rizzo IFNGINIEiRS Associates, Inc.

C*oN', L1TA\%TS.

Sheet 135 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment ID No. FCV-ICH-113A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description Boric Acid to Blender FCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-2-1-12.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-2-1-12.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGSNEi &ChOeMLTAN(S Sheet 136 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. FCV-IFW-103B Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description 3B AFW Pump Recirc Control Valve Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small A 0 V on -3" line well supportedandfound in good condition.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? X Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? X Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? X (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X F- -T potentially adverse seismic conditions?

L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EXCINFLRSý CONSULTANMS Sheet 137 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W*) N U Equipment ID No. FCV-IFW-103B Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description 3B AFW Pump Recirc Control Valve Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x I7I I I Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

Sheet 138 of 439 I Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEER,& CONSULTA*-S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: T N U Equipment IDNo. FCV-IFW-103B Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description 3B AFW Pump Recirc Control Valve Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-1-1-50.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-50.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTAN'h Sheet 139 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: () N U Equipment IDNo. FCV-IFW-103B Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description 3B AFW Pump Recirc Control Valve File Name: 2-63-1-1-50.jpeg

Description:

View of flexible attached lines

L O Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINERS & CONSULTANTS Sheet 140 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. FW-59 Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Common Lube Oil Coolers 3-way Manual Valve Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Manual Valve Common Lube Oil Coolers 3-wa*

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one I X of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on a -2 1/2" diam line with adequate support configuration.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y N U

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? II I I N/Ax I (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 141 of 439 L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CO)NSUL TAN-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment ID No. FW-59 Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Common Lube Oil Coolers 3-way Manual Valve Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? X Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, X and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Nearby temporary scaffold identified to be well restrained Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? X Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x - -F of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X II Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

Sheet 142 of 439 Q Paul C. Rizzo Asssociates, Inc.

& COMU LTAN'rT ENGINEEX-4 Status: 1* N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. FW-59 Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Common Lube Oil Coolers 3-way Manual Valve Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

rile Name: 2-oi-s-i-3u.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID irue Iname: --o-L-a-i-u.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 143 of 439

[ Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

FNGINEERS& CONSLLTUMNS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. FW-P-2 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Turbine Driven Pump Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

XZLI II Mounted on skid and anchoredwith 8-3/4" diam anchor bolts.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? X Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface X oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? X (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified per drawing 08700-02.040-0005,Rev. E.

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x * ý-

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 144 of 439

[ Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTAN*T Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. FW-P-2 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Turbine Driven Pump Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached pie lines are adequately supported Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x - -T I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X II Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

I* --* Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS&. CONW LTAN-T Sheet 145 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. FW-P-2 Equ ip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Turbine Dri yen Pump Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

vile Name: 2-6 l--i-.)U.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-3-1-M).jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 146 of 439 I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGIMMS r CONSLLTANnS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. FW-P-2 Equ ip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Turbine Dri yen Pump File Name: 2-64-3-1-50.jpeg

Description:

View of component anchorage configuration File Name: 2-73-3-1-50.jpeg

Description:

View of attached pipe lines

LX--Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTAN"TS Sheet 147 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. FW-P-3A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description NO. 3A Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one LX I I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on skid and anchoredwith 8-3/4" diam anchor bolts.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verifled per drawing 02.040-001 lB and 8700-RC-21M. (see also caic.

52233-C-007).

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I2C'Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& COVNULTALrS Sheet 148 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W*1 N U Equipment ID No. FW-P-3A Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description NO. 3A Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x I I I I and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x I Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Am L/

Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

Sheet 149 of 439

• -- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CO'NM*LTA&%*

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. FW-P-3A Equ ip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description NO. 3A Moltor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-4-1-50.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2 4-1-50.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

IŽ Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERM

& CONSULTANTS Sheet 150 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. FW-P-3A Equ ip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description NO. 3A Mo tor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumo File Name: 2-63-4-1-50.jpeg

Description:

View of component anchorage configuration

Sheet 151 of 439 I ŽPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONIS LTA'Tn Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Y) N U Equipment ID No. FW-T-2 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Aux Feed Pump Steam Terry Turbine Location: Bldg. SFGB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

ZIEX Mounted on same skid as FW-P-2 pump. Skid anchoredwith 8-3/4" diam anchor bolts.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? X Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? X Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X potentially adverse seismic conditions?

L*Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTAnTS Sheet 152 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. FW-T-2 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Aux Feed Pumpm Steam Terryl Turbine Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

Sheet 153 of 439 4r---Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

T5 ENGINEERS& CONAIL1/K,%

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. FW-T-2 Equ ip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Aux Feed Piump Steam Terry Turbine Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

rite iqame: z-oI-,-i-aLj.peg

Description:

Component Plate ID r ne iName: L-oL-a-I-3u.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 154 of 439

- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

& CONLStTANTS Eq'*GINEERS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. HCV-ICH-186 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description RCP Seal SUP H-and CONT Location: Bldg. AXLB Floor El. 722 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one I X of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Valve mounted on well supported 4" diam line. Yoke supportedto wall andpiping is supportedback to same wall.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? -T xR--I Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? 7777-x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I I I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

L 2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

FI';(INER. .&CONSULTANTS Sheet 155 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Y) N U Equipment ID No. HCV-ICH-186 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description RCP Seal SUP Hand CONT Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free IX I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

Sheet 156 of 439 L[YŽPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

FNC.INaMS & COMULTANMh Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. HCV-ICH-186 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description RCP Seal SUP Hand CONT Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

-~9-k fo Dile Name: C-om-o-ntla-tpeD

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-12.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 157 of 439 L 41r Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSUtLANT.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUSI-I Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus I Inverter Location: Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one XIY I I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

6-5/8" diam anchors identifiedfor anchorageconfiguration.Adequate separation identified between adjacentpanels.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x I i I 7 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing RE-0038D confirms anchorage configuration.(see also ca/c. 52233-C-I 7).

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of xI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 158 of 439 L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CON LTA"TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUSi-I Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus I Inverter Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached conduits identifiedwith adequateflexibility.

Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 159 of 439 ENCINlERS & CONSULTA"IT, Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUSI-I Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus I Inverter Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2 -6 1-8 25.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2 8-1-25.jpeg

Description:

General view of component EM

Sheet 160 of 439 X Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

LNOINEERS& CONSULTAN-n Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Y) N U Equipment IDNo. INV-VITBUSI-I Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus I Inverter File Name: 2-63-8-1-25.jpeg

Description:

View of top entry conduits File Name: 2-64-8-1-25.jpeg

Description:

View of anchorage configuration

[I--- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & COWYLTAN, M Sheet 161 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUSI-I Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus I Inverter File Name: 2-73-8-1-25.jpeg

Description:

Front view of base anchorage configuration

Sheet 162 of 439 I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULT (Sn W Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUS 1-3 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus III Inverter Location: Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one X I I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Attached to support base with 6-518"diam machine bolts. Support base anchoredto concrete with 8-3/4" anchors.Around 10" separationidentifiedwith adjacentpanels.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing RE-0038B confirms anchorageconfiguration.(see also calc. 52233-CI-01 7).

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 163 of 439 1-.-% Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

COLTThTS ENGINEERS/ E4k Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUS1-3 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus 111 Inverter Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? X Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, X and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall SB-I-15 has been qualifiedper IE 80-11 review.

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? X Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x - -TI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? X II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

Sheet 164 of 439

[X Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E*4CINEERS& NSULTAN-T Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status: W N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUS 1-3 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus II Inverter Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-6-1-25.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-c-i-2:.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

UNGNINEER-S

& C(ONSULTA*XS Sheet 165 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUSI-3 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus IlI Inverter File Name: 2 6-1-25.jpeg

Description:

Front view of base anchorage configuration lIle Name: 2-64-6-1-25.jpeg

Description:

Close up view of anchorage detail

Sheet 166 of 439 I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTAKTM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUS 1-3 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus III Inverter File Name: 2-73-6-1-25.jpeg

Description:

View of weld detail on channel mounting base File Name: 2-94-6-1-25.jpeg

Description:

General view of base configuration

D 2 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTAVI" Sheet 167 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Y) N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUSI-4 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus I'VE Inverter Location: Bldg. SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one I Yx II N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Attached to support base with 6-5/8"diam machine bolts. Support base anchoredto concrete with 8-3/4" anchors.Around 10" separationidentifiedwith adjacentpanels.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing RE-0038B confirms anchorageconfiguration. (see also caic. 52233-C-017).

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x potentially adverse seismic conditions?

LCND Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& COUIJLTANTl Sheet 168 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUS1-4 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus I'VE Inverter Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall SB- 1-9 has been qualifiedper IE 80-11 review.

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

LiPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULT&%h-T Sheet 169 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUSI-4 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus I'VE Inverter Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2 2-1-26.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-2-1-26.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 170 of 439 IX-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULT&NTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUS 1-4 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus I'VE Inverter File Name: 2-63-2-1-26.jpeg

Description:

View of top entry conduits File Name: 2-64-2-1-26.jpeg

Description:

Front view of base anchorage configuration

Sheet 171 of 439 L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSUET&NTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (W) N U Equipment ID No. INV-VITBUSI-4 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Vital Bus I'VE Inverter File Name: 2-73-2-1-26.jpeg

Description:

Close up view of anchorage detail File Name: 2-94-2-1-26.jpeg

Description:

View of weld detail on channel mounting base

Sheet 172 of 439 L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTANT5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. LS-I-EE-201-1 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description EE-EG-I Day Tank Level (Pump CTRL) Level Switch Location: Bldg. DGBX Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one EZ I xI I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Rigidly attachedto top of EE-TK-2A lank.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x  ::1 oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x T -

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 173 of 439 LCYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, NGINCEILS

& ONSI LTANtS Inc.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W1 N U Equipment ID No. LS-I-EE-201-1 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description EE-EG-I Day Tank Level (Pump CTRL) Level Switch Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Attached linesfound with adequateflexibility.

Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 10/1/20 12 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

Sheet 174 of 439 DX Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. LS-1-EE-201-1 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description EE-EG-I Day Tank Level (Pump CTRL) Level Switch Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

rile l"4ame: -o1-.3-I-zvu.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-3-1-20.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTANT$

Sheet 175 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (9) N U Equipment ID No. LT-IQS-IOOA Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description RWST Level Transmitter Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one II x of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on short cantilever support (-12") made of HSS 2 1/2" x 3"x 1/4". Support is attachedto concrete wall suroundingthe tank with 4-1/2" diam anchor bolts.

Equipment brackets are welded to the support structure.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Some signs of of rust visible on brackets. Judgednot a concern.

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x T TI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 176 of 439 L*~ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

SNiINElkdw & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (K) N U Equipment IDNo. LT-IQS-100A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description RWST Level Transmitter Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x II I Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012

/g/

Adam L. Helifrich Date: 10/1/2012

L V, Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 177 of 439 ENG1NEERM

& CONS' LTAýNT Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. LT-IQS-IOOA Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description RWST Level Transmitter Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-6I-1-1-09.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-09.jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Sheet 178 of 439 I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSUJLTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (2) N U Equipment ID No. MCC-I-E1 Equip. Class 1. Motor Control Center Equipment Description 480V Motor Comtrol Center Fed From 480V Substation 1-8 Emergency Bus via 1NBKR 8N7 Location: Bldg. INTS Floor El. 705 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage Y N

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one XIxI I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

3 Section MCC, each section's base channel is welded to embed steel with at least an average of 5 1/2" of 1/4" welds.

Y N U N/A

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? x Y N U N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x oxidation?

Y N U N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? x Portion of concrete cover on the embed steel is exposedbutjudged adequate as the load path of the embed steel does not require this cover to be effective.

Y N U N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? x (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Base weld detail in MCC-I-EI verified per Calculation52233-G-OO Anchorage Calc Y N U

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of x I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

[-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGIN[ERS & CONMULTATS Sheet 179 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. MCC-I-EI Equip. Class 1.Motor Control Center Equipment Description 480V Motor Comtrol Center Fed From 480V Substation 1-8 Emergency Bus via INBKR 8N7 Interaction Effects Y N U N/A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? x Y N U N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, x and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N U N/A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? x Minimal top restraintprovided by top entry conduit.

Y N U

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free x I I I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012

of 439 LZYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULTANT Sheet180 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: N U Equipment ID No. MCC-1-El Equip. Class 1. Motor Control Center Equipment Description 480V Motor Comtrol Center Fed From 480V Substation 1-8 Emergency Bus via INBKR 8N7 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Iu.I File Name: 2-61-1-1-27.jpeg

Description:

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-27jpeg

Description:

General view of component

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet of 439 ENGINEERS& CONSULTANTr Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Y) N U Equipment IDNo. MCC-I-E1 Equip. Class 1. Motor Control Center Equipment Description 480V Motor Comtrol Center Fed From 480V Substation 1-8 Emergency Bus via INBKR 8N7 File Name: 2-63-1-1-27.jpeg

Description:

View of spalled concrete at base of MCC File Name: 2-64-1-1-27.jpeg

Description:

View of top entry conduits