ML16006A229

NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) FW: LIC-15-0142

ML16006A229
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	01/06/2016
From:	Hansher B Omaha Public Power District
To:	Lyon F Plant Licensing Branch IV
References
MF6676
Download: ML16006A229 (3)

Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: HANSHER, BILL R <bhansher@oppd.com>

Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 7:44 AM To: Lyon, Fred Cc: BLOME, BRADLEY H; EDWARDS, MICHAEL L; QUEEN, STEVEN P; WESTRUM, ANDREW N

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: FW: LIC-15-0142

Fred, The below may provide some clarity. If needed, we can certainly schedule a quick call to discuss this.

There were four specific requests, made in the previous LAR submittal, which are tied to Item 4 of the NRC acceptance review letter. These are as follows:

1. The use of Ductility Ratios

2. The use of Inelastic Absorption Factors

3. The use of Dynamic Increase Factors

4. The use of Limit Design Method As was discussed with the NRC via teleconference, items one and two have been removed from the LAR. Items three and four have been retained. Specifically, the use of Dynamic Increase Factors in accordance with ACI-349 Appendix C is being requested but details have been added for clarification. This is in accordance the meeting note, and keep DIF when allowed by ACI 349, App. C." Additionally, there was no indication made within the NRC acceptance review letter that the use of the Limit Design Method is considered to be inappropriate. Therefore, the request to use the Limit Design Method has been retained.

In Summary:

1. The use of Ductility Ratios - Removed

2. The use of Inelastic Absorption Factors - Removed

3. The use of Dynamic Increase Factors - Added clarification of use in accordance with ACI 349

4. The use of Limit Design Method - No Action Required From: Lyon, Fred [1]

Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 11:29 AM To: HANSHER, BILL R Cc: EDWARDS, MICHAEL L; BLOME, BRADLEY H

Subject:

RE: FW: LIC-15-0142 Importance: High External Email Notice Think before you click!

Email sent from prvs=805564828=Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov The staff is still doing the acceptance review (due to holiday leave); it will be completed by Friday. However, I wanted to alert you to one question that has risen:

1

The licensee is still asking to use Appendix C of ACI 349 methodology (Item 4 of the LAR: use of limit design method for evaluation of RC&C --- Section 3.4 of the LAR). This item was in the original LAR (language has been changed but the essence of the request is the same).

We discussed this item in our teleconference with you and our understanding was that you were going to withdraw the use of Appendix C methodology and only include the use of DIF (I had written in my notes from the call that, the licensee would "withdraw the Item 4 exceptions and keep DIF when allowed by ACI 349, App.

C.").

Are we missing something here? With the exception of the use of DIF, Item 4 (described in Section 3.4 of the LAR) seems to have the same problems as noted before.

My goal here is to get the LAR past LIC-109 (sufficient information is available to begin the technical review) and into LIC-101 (making a regulatory decision based on the technical review). Thanks, Fred

---

Original Message-----

From: HANSHER, BILL R [2]

Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:49 PM To: Lyon, Fred <Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov>; BLOME, BRADLEY H <bblome@oppd.com>

Cc: EDWARDS, MICHAEL L <medwards@oppd.com>

Subject:

[External_Sender] FW: LIC-15-0142 Attached is the supplement to LAR on containment internal structures, which was signed and is being sent FedEx to DCD. Have a Merry Christmas/happy holidays.

---

Original Message-----

From: EDWARDS, MICHAEL L Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 2:32 PM To: HANSHER, BILL R

Subject:

LIC-15-0142 This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary information and is for use only by the intended recipient. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, or acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

2

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2574 Mail Envelope Properties (C16FEABDA21F494292E249EE7BA0EF84CED853D4)

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: FW: LIC-15-0142 Sent Date: 1/6/2016 7:44:08 AM Received Date: 1/6/2016 7:44:12 AM From: HANSHER, BILL R Created By: bhansher@oppd.com Recipients:

"BLOME, BRADLEY H" <bblome@oppd.com>

Tracking Status: None "EDWARDS, MICHAEL L" <medwards@oppd.com>

Tracking Status: None "QUEEN, STEVEN P" <spqueen@oppd.com>

Tracking Status: None "WESTRUM, ANDREW N" <anwestrum@oppd.com>

Tracking Status: None "Lyon, Fred" <Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: SEPEX731.oppd.oppd-ds.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 4033 1/6/2016 7:44:12 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: HANSHER, BILL R <bhansher@oppd.com>

Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 7:44 AM To: Lyon, Fred Cc: BLOME, BRADLEY H; EDWARDS, MICHAEL L; QUEEN, STEVEN P; WESTRUM, ANDREW N

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: FW: LIC-15-0142

Fred, The below may provide some clarity. If needed, we can certainly schedule a quick call to discuss this.

There were four specific requests, made in the previous LAR submittal, which are tied to Item 4 of the NRC acceptance review letter. These are as follows:

1. The use of Ductility Ratios

2. The use of Inelastic Absorption Factors

3. The use of Dynamic Increase Factors

4. The use of Limit Design Method As was discussed with the NRC via teleconference, items one and two have been removed from the LAR. Items three and four have been retained. Specifically, the use of Dynamic Increase Factors in accordance with ACI-349 Appendix C is being requested but details have been added for clarification. This is in accordance the meeting note, and keep DIF when allowed by ACI 349, App. C." Additionally, there was no indication made within the NRC acceptance review letter that the use of the Limit Design Method is considered to be inappropriate. Therefore, the request to use the Limit Design Method has been retained.

In Summary:

1. The use of Ductility Ratios - Removed

2. The use of Inelastic Absorption Factors - Removed

3. The use of Dynamic Increase Factors - Added clarification of use in accordance with ACI 349

4. The use of Limit Design Method - No Action Required From: Lyon, Fred [3]

Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 11:29 AM To: HANSHER, BILL R Cc: EDWARDS, MICHAEL L; BLOME, BRADLEY H

Subject:

RE: FW: LIC-15-0142 Importance: High External Email Notice Think before you click!

Email sent from prvs=805564828=Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov The staff is still doing the acceptance review (due to holiday leave); it will be completed by Friday. However, I wanted to alert you to one question that has risen:

1

The licensee is still asking to use Appendix C of ACI 349 methodology (Item 4 of the LAR: use of limit design method for evaluation of RC&C --- Section 3.4 of the LAR). This item was in the original LAR (language has been changed but the essence of the request is the same).

We discussed this item in our teleconference with you and our understanding was that you were going to withdraw the use of Appendix C methodology and only include the use of DIF (I had written in my notes from the call that, the licensee would "withdraw the Item 4 exceptions and keep DIF when allowed by ACI 349, App.

C.").

Are we missing something here? With the exception of the use of DIF, Item 4 (described in Section 3.4 of the LAR) seems to have the same problems as noted before.

My goal here is to get the LAR past LIC-109 (sufficient information is available to begin the technical review) and into LIC-101 (making a regulatory decision based on the technical review). Thanks, Fred

---

Original Message-----

From: HANSHER, BILL R [4]

Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:49 PM To: Lyon, Fred <Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov>; BLOME, BRADLEY H <bblome@oppd.com>

Cc: EDWARDS, MICHAEL L <medwards@oppd.com>

Subject:

[External_Sender] FW: LIC-15-0142 Attached is the supplement to LAR on containment internal structures, which was signed and is being sent FedEx to DCD. Have a Merry Christmas/happy holidays.

---

Original Message-----

From: EDWARDS, MICHAEL L Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 2:32 PM To: HANSHER, BILL R

Subject:

LIC-15-0142 This e-mail contains Omaha Public Power District's confidential and proprietary information and is for use only by the intended recipient. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this e-mail is not a contract offer, amendment, or acceptance. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

2

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2574 Mail Envelope Properties (C16FEABDA21F494292E249EE7BA0EF84CED853D4)

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: FW: LIC-15-0142 Sent Date: 1/6/2016 7:44:08 AM Received Date: 1/6/2016 7:44:12 AM From: HANSHER, BILL R Created By: bhansher@oppd.com Recipients:

"BLOME, BRADLEY H" <bblome@oppd.com>

Tracking Status: None "EDWARDS, MICHAEL L" <medwards@oppd.com>

Tracking Status: None "QUEEN, STEVEN P" <spqueen@oppd.com>

Tracking Status: None "WESTRUM, ANDREW N" <anwestrum@oppd.com>

Tracking Status: None "Lyon, Fred" <Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: SEPEX731.oppd.oppd-ds.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 4033 1/6/2016 7:44:12 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: