ML15086A161: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 03/16/2015 | | issue date = 03/16/2015 | ||
| title = E-Mail from James Morris, Pg&E, to John Hickman, NRC, Response to a Request for Additional Information Re Humboldt Bay License Termination Plan | | title = E-Mail from James Morris, Pg&E, to John Hickman, NRC, Response to a Request for Additional Information Re Humboldt Bay License Termination Plan | ||
| author name = Morris J | | author name = Morris J | ||
| author affiliation = Pacific Gas & Electric Co | | author affiliation = Pacific Gas & Electric Co | ||
| addressee name = Hickman J | | addressee name = Hickman J | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Hickman, John From: Morris, James R <JY1E@pge.com> | {{#Wiki_filter:Hickman, John From: Morris, James R <JY1E@pge.com> | ||
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:36 PM To: Hickman, John Cc: Barley, William; Erickson, Martin | Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:36 PM To: Hickman, John Cc: Barley, William; Erickson, Martin | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: LTP Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged John, With respect to the draft questions associated with the topic of Development of Embedded and Buried Piping DCGL Value, the following clarifying information is provided.Please let me know if any additional information is required.Regards, Jim The cover material depth for buried piping is 2 meters. The TBD will be revised to reflect the 2 meter depth.The 9.67E-04 mrem/yr in the TBD is correct. The new RESRAD runs were performed after the RAI response was submitted. | RE: LTP Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged | ||
: John, With respect to the draft questions associated with the topic of Development of Embedded and Buried Piping DCGL Value, the following clarifying information is provided. | |||
Please let me know if any additional information is required. | |||
: Regards, Jim The cover material depth for buried piping is 2 meters. The TBD will be revised to reflect the 2 meter depth. | |||
The 9.67E-04 mrem/yr in the TBD is correct. The new RESRAD runs were performed after the RAI response was submitted. | |||
Section 5.4.3.2 will be revised in Revision 2 of the LTP to include the two paragraphs with the exception of the GARDIAN Ill. The GARDIAN III was not available therefore we will be using the GARDIAN. The second paragraph will be revised to describe the four vs six detector configuration. | Section 5.4.3.2 will be revised in Revision 2 of the LTP to include the two paragraphs with the exception of the GARDIAN Ill. The GARDIAN III was not available therefore we will be using the GARDIAN. The second paragraph will be revised to describe the four vs six detector configuration. | ||
The TBD we will submit will evaluate the use of the GARDIAN system.We will also add to the end of the 2nd paragraph: "Either bulk assay method must be able to adequately assess soils to the same rigor of a MARSSIM FSS. As such, materials surveyed via lifts or bulk survey methods will be subject to the same NRC review, inspection and confirmatory surveys associated with all site FSS survey areas." From: Hickman, John [mailto:John.Hickmansnrc.gov] | The TBD we will submit will evaluate the use of the GARDIAN system. | ||
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 6:03 AM To: Morris, James R | We will also add to the end of the 2nd paragraph: "Either bulk assay method must be able to adequately assess soils to the same rigor of a MARSSIM FSS. As such, materials surveyed via lifts or bulk survey methods will be subject to the same NRC review, inspection and confirmatory surveys associated with all site FSS survey areas." | ||
From: Hickman, John [mailto:John.Hickmansnrc.gov] | |||
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 6:03 AM To: Morris, James R | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
LTP Jim, As we are finalizing the SE for the LTP we have identified 3 relative minor issues that we need resolved. | LTP | ||
I have attached portions of the draft SE that include the issues with comments. | : Jim, As we are finalizing the SE for the LTP we have identified 3 relative minor issues that we need resolved. I have attached portions of the draft SE that include the issues with comments. Please forward to the appropriate staff and get back to me with resolutions. | ||
Please forward to the appropriate staff and get back to me with resolutions. | : Thanks, John I}} | ||
Thanks, John I}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:50, 31 October 2019
| ML15086A161 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Humboldt Bay |
| Issue date: | 03/16/2015 |
| From: | Morris J Pacific Gas & Electric Co |
| To: | John Hickman Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards |
| References | |
| Download: ML15086A161 (1) | |
Text
Hickman, John From: Morris, James R <JY1E@pge.com>
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:36 PM To: Hickman, John Cc: Barley, William; Erickson, Martin
Subject:
RE: LTP Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged
- John, With respect to the draft questions associated with the topic of Development of Embedded and Buried Piping DCGL Value, the following clarifying information is provided.
Please let me know if any additional information is required.
- Regards, Jim The cover material depth for buried piping is 2 meters. The TBD will be revised to reflect the 2 meter depth.
The 9.67E-04 mrem/yr in the TBD is correct. The new RESRAD runs were performed after the RAI response was submitted.
Section 5.4.3.2 will be revised in Revision 2 of the LTP to include the two paragraphs with the exception of the GARDIAN Ill. The GARDIAN III was not available therefore we will be using the GARDIAN. The second paragraph will be revised to describe the four vs six detector configuration.
The TBD we will submit will evaluate the use of the GARDIAN system.
We will also add to the end of the 2nd paragraph: "Either bulk assay method must be able to adequately assess soils to the same rigor of a MARSSIM FSS. As such, materials surveyed via lifts or bulk survey methods will be subject to the same NRC review, inspection and confirmatory surveys associated with all site FSS survey areas."
From: Hickman, John [1]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 6:03 AM To: Morris, James R
Subject:
- Jim, As we are finalizing the SE for the LTP we have identified 3 relative minor issues that we need resolved. I have attached portions of the draft SE that include the issues with comments. Please forward to the appropriate staff and get back to me with resolutions.
- Thanks, John I