ML18018A938: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/28/1978
| issue date = 04/28/1978
| title = Letter Responding to the April 6, 1978 Letter Requesting Additional Information Regarding a Request for an Extension of the Latest Completion Date for Construction Permit No. CPPR-112
| title = Letter Responding to the April 6, 1978 Letter Requesting Additional Information Regarding a Request for an Extension of the Latest Completion Date for Construction Permit No. CPPR-112
| author name = Rhode G K
| author name = Rhode G
| author affiliation = Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
| author affiliation = Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
| addressee name = Case E G
| addressee name = Case E
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000410
| docket = 05000410
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORY INFQRI'fATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)DISTRIBUTION FOR INCOMING MATERIAL 50-410 REC: CASE E G NRC ORG: RHODE G K NIAGARA MOHAWK PWR DOCDATE: 04/28/78 DATE RCVD: 05/Oi/78 DOCTYPE: LETTER NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORY INFQRI'fATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
NO COPIES RECEIVED  
DISTRIBUTION FOR INCOMING MATERIAL                           50-410 REC:   CASE E     G                   ORG: RHODE G K                   DOCDATE: 04/28/78 NRC                                  NIAGARA MOHAWK PWR              DATE RCVD: 05/Oi/78 DOCTYPE: LETTER           NOTARIZED: NO                                   COPIES RECEIVED


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
LTR 1 ENCL 1 INFO REQUESTED BY S.VARGA IN LTR DTD 04/06/78 RE: UTILITY REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF LATEST COMPLETION DATE FOR CPPR-112.PLANT NAME: NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 REVIEWER INITIAL: XBT DISTRIBUTOR INITIAL:~DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MATERIAL IS AS FOLLOWS REQUESTS FOR EXEMPTIONS (ALL TYPES)<DISTRIBUTIOI4 CODE B006)FOR ACTION'OR INFO: FOR I l4FO: INTERNAL: EXTERNAL: BR CHIEF VARGA+~~W/ENCL LIC ASST SERVICE++W/ENCL MOQRE++LTR ONLY(i)N.LY<1)REG FILE++W/EN T ABELL+4W/ENCL LPDR S OSWEGO)NY+>W/ENCL ACRS CAT B4~~W/16 ENCL PROS MGR KANE++W/ENCL REGAN++LTR ONLY(i)DUNCAN4+LTR ONLY<1)NRC PDR++W/ENCL J MILLER>+W/ENCL E.QASF~/E'~M-'ISTRIBUTION:
LTR 1     ENCL 1 INFO REQUESTED BY S. VARGA IN LTR DTD 04/06/78 RE:         UTILITY REQUEST   FOR EXTENSION OF LATEST COMPLETION DATE FOR CPPR-112.
LTR 30 ENCL 26 SIZE: 2P"CONTROL NBR: 781210181 THE END 1 Ai I A I h NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NIAGARA'~MOHAWK 300 ERIE BOULEVARO, WEST SYRACUSE.N.Y.I 3202 April 28, 1978 Mr.Edson G.Case, Acting Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555
PLANT NAME: NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2                             REVIEWER INITIAL: XBT DISTRIBUTOR DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MATERIAL IS AS FOLLOWS INITIAL: ~
REQUESTS FOR EXEMPTIONS (ALL TYPES)
      <DISTRIBUTIOI4 CODE B006)
FOR                   BR CHIEF VARGA+~~W/ENCL           PROS MGR KANE++W/ENCL ACTION'OR LIC ASST SERVICE++W/ENCL INFO:            MOQRE++LTR   ONLY(i)             REGAN++LTR ONLY(i)
FOR  I l4FO:          N              . LY< 1)          DUNCAN4+LTR ONLY< 1)
INTERNAL:              REG  FILE++W/EN                  NRC PDR++W/ENCL J MILLER>+W/ENCL T ABELL+4W/ENCL                    E. QASF ~/E'~M-EXTERNAL:              LPDR S OSWEGO)  NY+>W/ENCL ACRS  CAT B4~~W/16 ENCL
'ISTRIBUTION:             LTR 30     ENCL 26                       "CONTROL NBR:   781210181 SIZE: 2P THE END


==Dear Mr.Case:==
Ai 1
8~.",+p~17 Re: Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No.50-410 Enclosed is the additional information that Mr.Varga of your staff requested in a letter dated April 6, 1978 regarding the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation request for an extension of the latest completion date for Construction Permit No.CPPR-112.This information quantifies the extent of the delay associated with each of the three causes cited.It also identifies on a time scale, the point at which the delay was incurred and the extent it alone affected the overall schedule for completion of the plant.The delays show good cause for extending the latest date of Construction Permit No.CPPR-112 to December 31, 1984.Very truly yours, NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION Ger ld.Rhode, Vice President System Projec Management NLR/s zd Enclosure 781210)ag Soo<s(a+I/g  
I A
.f'*<r 4C~l)1.p'~~4/)44 p'1)ll I 4 l I 7/73 I/74 7/74 I/75 7/75 i/76 7/76 7/77 I/77 I/78 7/78 I/79 7/79 CP ISSUE 7 74 CP EXPIRATI N 7/78 (2)13)i 3)iv (3 (3)iii (3)v (3 vi (3)i 3)vii (3)viii DELAYCAUSE (3)x DATE OF DELAY DURATION OF DELAY DELAY CAUSE DATE OF DELAY DURATION OF DELAY (I)NEED FOR POWER POSTPONED (2)LACK OF FUNDS AT REASONABLE RATES (3)i MARK 3E LAR DESIGN CHANGES il STUDY OF GEOLOGICAL FEATURES iii CHANGE FROM ONCE-THROUGH TO CLOSED LOOP COOLING iv ELECTRICAL RACEWAY AND REACTOR BUILDING STRUCTURAL REDESIGN v LABOR PROBLEMS NCLUDDIG WORK STOPPAGES vi WELDER SHORTAGE AND MATERIAL PROCUREMENT DELAYS DEC.I s 1973 NOV.I s 1974 SEP.I, 1976 DEC.13s 1976 JUL.19s 1976 JAN I s 1975 JUN.I s ISN OCT I sl977 DEC.I s 1977 72 MO.12 MO.12 MO.12 Ma 4 MO.9 MO.3 MO.I MO.12 MO.vii DELAY IN GRANTING ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT viii IMPLEMENTATION OF NRC REQUIREMENT FOR ECCS PUMP FLOOD PROTECTION ix IMPLEMENTATION OF PIPE WHIP PROTECTION REQUNIEMENTS OF RG.1.46 x RG.1.89 CLASS IE EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS.
h I
JUI I, 1973 OCT.I, 1973 MAY I, 1973 NOV.I, 1974 CONSTRUCTION DELAYS NINE MILE POINT, UNIT 2 12 MO.IO MO.12 MO.6 MO.
 
TELECOPIED TO N 0 A QW 5f H-C (FROA y/~~~at.m TIViE Q;PP DC.TE/~la-~~/
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NIAGARA  '~      MOHAWK 300 ERIE BOULEVARO, WEST SYRACUSE. N. Y. I 3202 April 28,        1978 8
f<~r I EOII(~C+Wp O~A.0 C>n qo 4+*+4 Docket No.50-410 UNITED STATES NUC R REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 631 PARK AVENUE KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA I 9406 g 6 APR l978 DRAVO Corporation Pipe Fabrication Division ATTN: Mr.Gustav Schwab Vice President and General Manager 1115 Gilman Avenue Marietta, Ohio 45750 Gentlemen:
Mr. Edson G. Case, Acting      Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
                                                    ~.", + p~
Washington, D. C. 20555 17
 
==Dear Mr. Case:==
 
Re: Nine Mile Point Unit             2 Docket No. 50-410 Enclosed is the additional information that Mr. Varga of your staff requested in a letter dated April 6, 1978 regarding the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation request for an extension of the latest completion date for Construction Permit No. CPPR-112. This information quantifies the extent of the delay associated with each of the three causes cited.
It also identifies on a time scale, the point at which the delay was incurred and the extent             it alone affected the overall schedule for completion of the plant. The delays show good cause for extending the latest date of Construction Permit No. CPPR-112 to December 31, 1984.
Very       truly yours, NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION Ger   ld . Rhode, Vice President System Projec Management NLR/s zd Enclosure 781210)ag Soo<     s(a+
I /g
 
                              .f'* < r 4C ~
l)1 .
p'
              ~   ~4/   )44 p'
1 I
)
4 ll l
I
 
7/73           I/74       7/74           I/75             7/75     i/76         7/76               7/77         I/77           I/78     7/78         I/79         7/79 CP ISSUE   7 74                                                                                                 CP EXPIRATI N   7/78 (2)
: 13) i (3) iii
: 3) iv (3                                       (3)v (3 vi 3)vii (3)viii (3)i (3)x DELAYCAUSE                              DATE OF DELAY   DURATION OF DELAY                           DELAY CAUSE                     DATE OF DELAY       DURATION OF DELAY (I) NEED FOR POWER POSTPONED                                   DEC. I s 1973      72  MO.              vii DELAY IN GRANTING ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION        JUI  I, 1973            12 MO.
PERMIT (2) LACK OF FUNDS AT REASONABLE RATES                           NOV. I s 1974        12 MO.              viii IMPLEMENTATIONOF NRC REQUIREMENT FOR ECCS      OCT. I, 1973            IO MO.
PUMP FLOOD PROTECTION (3) i   MARK 3E LAR DESIGN CHANGES                             SEP. I, 1976        12 MO.
ix IMPLEMENTATIONOF PIPE WHIP PROTECTION            MAY  I, 1973            12 MO.
il STUDY OF GEOLOGICAL FEATURES                           DEC. 13s 1976        12 Ma                    REQUNIEMENTS OF RG. 1.46 iii CHANGE FROM ONCE-THROUGH TO CLOSED                     JUL. 19s 1976        4 MO.                x RG.1.89 CLASS IE EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS.          NOV. I, 1974            6 MO.
LOOP COOLING iv ELECTRICAL RACEWAY AND REACTOR BUILDING                 JAN I s 1975          9 MO.
STRUCTURAL REDESIGN v LABOR PROBLEMS NCLUDDIG WORK STOPPAGES                   JUN. I s ISN OCT I sl977 3 MO.
I MO.
CONSTRUCTION DELAYS vi WELDER DELAYS SHORTAGE AND MATERIALPROCUREMENT              DEC. I s 1977        12 MO.
NINE MILE POINT, UNIT 2
 
TELECOPIED TO N 0 A QW 5f H- C (
FROA TIViE y
Q;PP
          /~   ~
DC.TE
                  ~at.m
                  /~la- ~~/
 
f<
~C+
    ~r I EOII(
Wp UNITED STATES O~
A.
NUC    R  REGULATORY COMMISSION 0                                 REGION I 631 PARK AVENUE C>
KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA I 9406 n             qo 4+*+ 4 Docket No. 50-410                                     g 6 APR l978 DRAVO         Corporation Pipe       Fabrication   Division ATTN:           Mr. Gustav Schwab Vice President and General Manager 1115 Gilman Avenue Marietta, Ohio             45750 Gentlemen:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Report of January 30, 1978 Regarding the Dravo Pipe Fabrication Division guality Assurance Program Me received your letter of April 7, 1978, concerning the subject report.Your letter will'be made a part of the public record as you requested.
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Report of January 30, 1978 Regarding the Dravo Pipe Fabrication Division guality Assurance Program Me   received your   letter of April 7, 1978, concerning the subject report.         Your letter will 'be made a part of the public record as you requested.
Sincerely, I Bo ce H.Gr ier Director 1('il f1OC~l." l I I p IIPC f"ilf?Loca I l'tll: TIC Ilf?R Re1din.f I.!lf?-: I f i I.(,a-o P,.I'>o'",.I R.1}@Youl',~l I).'/as-.-11 I'l Stol z K.Kni el 0.I)111 s il rljfl I..Crocf:r~I).Cl ul.ch.'Hi I I ia": I?fly t tsr>l~If.I)!nf.oil I).I'll I el I l'0)eC t"il>>1'l>>~.'tf:nrn~y, I I I}H'.1 I:o>>ii(3i nCPS (16)L.=1)ref ler ill?C I'al l.I<i;l~l-.: Ruf>en%l>>'I R.Tedesco G.Lainas J.Knight iff:I: I lfff, Sf'lf Wuy I I.Peltier C.Grimes C.Anderson T.Su K.Herring A.Hafiz APR 25)978
Sincerely, I
Bo ce H. Gr ier Director


d a d~~p,s Abc'"vA<<>>*++Docket Nos: 50-358 50-387 50-352/353 50-367 50-373/374 50-388 50-410 (50-322 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.20555 APR 25 j978 APPLICANT; MEMBERS OF MARK II OWNER'S GROUP  
1(
'il
 
iff:I:I lfff, Sf'lf Wuy I      APR 25 )978 f1OC  ~  l."    l I  I p IIPC f"ilf?
Loca      I  l'tll:
TIC Ilf?R    Re1din.f I.!lf?-: I f i I .
(,a-o P, . I'>o'",. I R. 1}@Youl',~l I). '/as-.-11        I'l Stol z K. Kni el
: 0. I)111 s il rljfl I.. Crocf:r          ~
I). Cl ul.ch.'
Hi I I ia":
I?    fly t tsr>l      ~
If. I)! nf.oil I). I'll    I el I l'0 ) eC t "il>> 1'l>>            ~
I. Peltier I I I}    .'tf:nrn~y, H'. I:o>>
ii(3i nCPS 1
(16)
L. =1)ref ler ill? C I'al l. I <        i;  l ~
l -.:          C. Grimes Ruf>en% l >>          'I                  C. Anderson R. Tedesco                                      T. Su G. Lainas                                    K. Herring J. Knight                                        A. Hafiz
 
d d~
a
        ~p,s Abc' UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 "vA                                 APR  25 j978
        <<>>*++
Docket Nos:     50-358 50-387 50-352/353 50-367 50-373/374 50-388 50-410 50-322
(
APPLICANT;   MEMBERS OF MARK   II OWNER'S GROUP


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
TRIP TO LIVERMORE, STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND GENERAL ELECTRIC TO DISCUSS MARK II POOL DYNAMIC LOADS~kkdd The purpose of this trip was to discuss several analytical and experimental programs related'o Mark II pool dynamic loads.A copy of the attendees, agenda and slides distributed at the meeting are attached.In the morning of the first day (Wednesday) we met with Livermore personnel to discuss the Livermore/DOR program to study fluid structure interactions (FSI)in the Mark-I Monticello Safety Relief Valve (SRV)tests.a Wednesday afternoon we met with personnel at Stanford Research Institute to discuss their 1/13 scale Mark II pool swell tests.Thursday we met with representatives of the Mark II owner's group and General Electric to discuss the status of several tasks in their Mark II pool dynamic load program.A summary of-the topics discussed in the meetings is provided below.~Sumar Livermore Meetin Ed McCauley of Livermore summarized the results of the FY 77 Livermore FSI program.Their study of SRV-FSI effects showed a trend of decreasing loads with increasing wall flexibility.
TRIP TO LIVERMORE, STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND GENERAL ELECTRIC TO DISCUSS MARK       II POOL DYNAMIC LOADS
The major limitations of their study included the plane section modeling of the containment and the modeling of the source.These assumptions result in an over-estimate of the dependence of SRV loads on wall flexibility.
            ~kkdd The purpose   of this trip was to discuss several analytical and experimental programs   related'o   Mark II pool dynamic loads. A copy of the attendees, agenda and slides distributed at the meeting are attached.
Future studies by Livermore are aimed at evaluating the importance of these parameters.
In the morning of the first day (Wednesday) we met with Livermore personnel to discuss the Livermore/DOR program to study fluid structure interactions (FSI) in the Mark-I Monticello Safety Relief Valve (SRV) tests.
h APR 35]g7g Standford Research Institute Meetin The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the preliminary results of the'Mark II 1/13 scale single vent tests.These SRI tests consisted of air charging tests..Shakedown tests were conducted to determine the affect of water vapor in scale air tests on pool swell phenomenon.
a Wednesday   afternoon we met with personnel at Stanford Research Institute to discuss their     1/13 scale Mark II pool swell tests.
The preliminary results for the SRI tests showed differences from similar tests conducted at MIT.The purpose of the meeting was to identify reasons for the differences.
Thursday we met with representatives of the Mark II owner's group and General Electric to discuss the status of several tasks in their Mark II pool dynamic load program. A summary of -the topics discussed in the meetings is provided below.
Additional SRI testing was.discussed to resolve differences in results.Hhi'le at the SRI facility we toured the pool dynamic test stands.Me noted that SRI is conducting EPRI funded tests to investigate steam chugging phenomena.
            ~Sumar Livermore Meetin Ed   McCauley of Livermore summarized the results of the FY 77 Livermore FSI program. Their study of SRV-FSI effects showed a trend of decreasing loads with increasing wall flexibility. The major limitations of their study included the plane section modeling of the containment and the modeling of the source.       These assumptions result in an over-estimate of the dependence of SRV loads on wall flexibility. Future studies by Livermore are aimed at evaluating the importance of these parameters.
Tests are being conducted at three different scales including single and multivent tests.This test program is a study of the fundamental phenomena of chugging.This program is not a par t of the Mark II owner group supporting program.Mark II Owner's Grou Meetin The topics discussed in this meeting are listed in the attached meeting agenda.A summary of discussion follows: 1.Monticello SRV-Mark II Fluid Structure Interaction Studies Or.H.Tang of General Electric discussed the results of studies at GE to determine the effect of containment wall flexibility on the measured SRV loads in the Monticello tests.GE performed calculations similar to those performed by Livermore.
 
Their plane strain calculations utilized similar assumptions of containment rigidity and load source to those performed by Livermore.
h APR 35 ]g7g Standford Research   Institute   Meetin The purpose   of this meeting was to discuss the preliminary results of the'Mark II 1/13 scale single vent tests. These SRI tests consisted of air charging tests. .Shakedown tests were conducted to determine the affect of water vapor in scale air tests on pool swell phenomenon.
Under these conditions they observed the same trend of reducing load with increasing wall flexibility as observed in the Livermore studies.However, the GE studies were extended to include axisymmetric calculations, 3D modeling of a torus segment and a multiple pulse source.Results of these studies show that wall flexibility amplifies the loads.This conclusion contradicts the Livermore 2D study.In addition they conducted analytical-experimental comparisons using their model and the Monticello data.The use of the more realistic assumptions in the analytical model substantiated the Mark II owner's claim that the Monticello benchmark is valid.The Monticello FSI study is now considered complete by the Mark II owner's group.Documentation will be provided to the NRC by the end of May 1978, In our March meeting with the Mark II owner's group we discussed the desirability of formulating a conservative chugging impulse load to resolve 4 T FSI questions.
The preliminary results for the SRI tests showed differences from similar tests conducted at MIT. The purpose of the meeting was to identify reasons for the differences. Additional SRI testing was
Dr.Healzer of General Electric discussed their plan for this task.They should complete this study by early June 1978.A status report will be provided at the next Mark II owner's meeting.This meeting is tentatively scheduled for mid May 1978, In addition we requested that Dr.Healzer provide us, within the next few'eeks, an outline of the objective of this task.3.SRV Pool Tem erature Limits T.Su of NRC provided an NRC status report on the issue of SRV pool temperature limits.He stated that based on our current review of the small scale tests there is inadequate supporting data to justify the current pool temperature limits for rams-head relief valve devices.As a result of our review we are preparing an NRC position requiring the use of quencher type devices in Mark II plants since these devices have higher pool temperature limits.4.DFFR Lead Plant SRV Loads T.Su of NRC provided a status report on the NRC review of the Mark II ramshead model.He highlighted several deficiencies in the current model.We also discussed the use of the ramshead model for those lead plants which have committed to a switch from a ramshead to a quencher device.H.Brinkman representing the Mark II owner's group stated that their plans are to use the current ramshead model to predict SRV loads for plants with quencher devices.Test programs are being developed to show that the use of these ramshead loads for quencher devices is a conservative approach.Current plans call for completion of the confirmatory tests prior to operation of the first Mark II plant.5, PSTF Im act Loads G.Maise of BNL outlined the results of the NRC evaluation of Mark II Pool Dynamic-impact loads.This study concluded that the current DFFR impact load specification is inadequate in that  
.discussed to resolve differences in results. Hhi'le at the SRI facility we toured the pool dynamic test stands.         Me noted that SRI is conducting EPRI funded tests to investigate steam chugging phenomena.             Tests are being conducted at three       different scales   including   single and multivent tests. This test program         is a study of the fundamental phenomena of chugging.       This program is not a par t of the Mark II owner group supporting program.
Mark   II Owner's Grou     Meetin The topics discussed in this meeting are listed in the attached meeting agenda. A summary of discussion follows:
: 1. Monticello SRV - Mark   II Fluid Structure Interaction Studies Or. H. Tang of General Electric discussed the results of studies at GE to determine the effect of containment wall flexibility on the measured SRV loads in the Monticello tests.           GE performed calculations similar to those performed by       Livermore. Their   plane strain calculations utilized     similar assumptions   of containment   rigidity and load source   to those performed by Livermore. Under these conditions they observed the same trend of reducing load with increasing wall flexibility as observed in the Livermore studies.
However, the GE studies were extended to include axisymmetric calculations, 3D modeling of a torus segment and a multiple pulse source. Results of these studies show that wall flexibility amplifies the loads. This conclusion contradicts the Livermore 2D study. In addition they conducted analytical-experimental comparisons using their model and the Monticello data. The use of the more realistic assumptions in the analytical model substantiated the Mark II owner's claim that the Monticello benchmark is valid.
The Monticello FSI study is now considered complete by the Mark II owner's group. Documentation will be provided to the NRC by the end of May 1978,
 
In our March meeting with the Mark II owner's group we discussed the desirability of formulating a conservative chugging impulse load to resolve 4 T FSI questions.         Dr. Healzer of General Electric discussed their plan for this task. They should complete this study by early June 1978. A status report will be provided at the next Mark II owner's meeting.
This meeting is tentatively scheduled for mid May 1978, In addition we requested that Dr. Healzer provide us, within the next few'eeks, an outline of the objective of this task.
: 3. SRV Pool Tem   erature Limits T. Su of NRC provided an       NRC status report on the issue of SRV pool temperature limits.       He stated that based on our current review of   the small scale   tests   there is inadequate supporting data to justify the current   pool temperature limits for rams-head relief valve devices.         As a result of our review we are preparing an NRC position requiring the use of quencher type devices in Mark II plants since these devices have higher pool temperature   limits.
: 4. DFFR Lead   Plant   SRV Loads T. Su of NRC provided a     status report on the NRC review of the Mark II ramshead model.         He highlighted several deficiencies in the current model. We also discussed the use of the ramshead model for those lead plants which have committed to a switch from a ramshead to a quencher device. H. Brinkman representing the Mark II owner's group stated that their plans are to use the current ramshead model to predict SRV loads for plants with quencher devices.
Test programs are being developed to show that the use of these ramshead loads for quencher devices is a conservative approach.
Current plans call for completion of the confirmatory tests prior to operation of the first Mark II plant.
5, PSTF Im act Loads G. Maise of BNL outlined the results       of the NRC evaluation of Mark II Pool Dynamic - impact loads.         This study concluded that the current   DFFR   impact load specification is inadequate in that


4 APR 2g]97B the impulse load specification does not include a conservative pulse duration.In addition no consideration has been given to the affect of target geometry on the impact load.The Mark II owner's stated that they had not had sufficient time to review the basis for our conclusions nor the impact of this potential load modification on equipment in specific Mark II plants.Their preliminary review of the BNL study has not uncovered any deficiences in the BNL study.However, conservatisms in the current impact load specification could be balanced against these recently identified non conservatisms.
4 APR 2g ]97B the impulse load specification does not include a conservative pulse duration. In addition no consideration has been given to the affect of target geometry on the impact load. The Mark II owner's stated that they had not had sufficient time to review the basis for our conclusions nor the impact of this potential load modification on equipment in specific Mark II plants. Their preliminary review of the BNL study has not uncovered any deficiences in the BNL study. However, conservatisms in the current impact load specification could be balanced against these recently identified non conservatisms. At the next Mark II owner's meeting in mid-May the Mark II owners will provide us their evaluation of the BNL study and a review of the impact of this load modification on specific Mark II plants.
At the next Mark II owner's meeting in mid-May the Mark II owners will provide us their evaluation of the BNL study and a review of the impact of this load modification on specific Mark II plants.g.(<,6 I.Peltier, Project Manager Light Hater Reactors Branch No.1 Division of Project Management
g.(<,6 I. Peltier, Project Manager Light Hater Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Project Management


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: l. Agenda
: 2. Attendance List
: 3. Viewgraph Material cc:  See  Following Pages
Long Island Lighting Company                <PR 25 ><78 ATTN: Mr. Andrew W. Wofford Vice President 175  East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801 Edward M. Barrett,  Esq.
General Counsel Long Island Lighting Company 250 Old Country Road Mineola,  New York 11501 Edward J. Walsh. Esq.
General Attorney Long Island Lighting Company 250 Old Country Road Mineola, New York 11501 Mr. Thomas Burke Project Manager, Shoreham Nuclear Power    Station P. 0. Box 618 Wading River, New York      11792 Director, Technical Development    Programs State of New York Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plazq Albany,  New York 12223 Haward L. Blau Blau and Cohn, P. C.
380 North Broadway jericho, New York 11753 Irving Like,  Esq.
Reilly, Like  and Schnieder 200 West Main  Street Babylon,  New York  11702 MUB  Technical Associates 366  California  Avenue Suite  6 Palo  Alto, California    94306
APR 25 1978 Philadelphi Electric    Company            Eugene  J. Bradley ATTN:  Mr. Edward G. Bauer, Jr.          Philadelphia Electric Company Vice President and General        Associate General Counsel Counsel                        2301 Market Street 2301 Market Street                        Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Philadelphia, Pensylvania      19101 Troy B, Conner, Jr. Ewq.
Conner, Moore & Corber 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.      W.
Washington, D. C. 20006 W. William Anderson, Esq.
Deputy Attorney General Room 512, Main Capitol Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Frank R. Clokey, Esq.
Special Assistant Attorney General Room 218, Towne House Apartments P. 0. Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pensylvania 17105 Honorable Lawrence Coughlin House  of Representatives Congress  of the United States Washington, D. C. 20515 Roger  BE  Reynolds,  Jr.,  Esq.
324 Swede    Street Norristown, Pennsylvania      19401 Willard  C. Hetzel, Esq.
312 main  Street East Greenville, Pennsylvania        18041 Lawrence Sager, Esq.
Sager & Sager Associates 45 High Street Pottstown, Pennsylvania      19464 Joseph A. Smyth Assistant County Solicitor County of Montgomery Courthouse Norristown, Pennsylvania      19404
APR  25 1978 The Cincinnati Gas 8 Electric Company        David B. Fankhauser,  PhD ATTN: Mr, Earl A, Borgmann                  3569 Nine Mile Road Vice President - Engineering        Cincinnati, Ohio 45230 P. 0. Box 960 Cincinnati,  Ohio  45201                    Thomas A. Luebbers, Esq.
Cincinnati City Solicitor Mr. William J. Moran                        Room 214  - City Hall General Counsel                              Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 The Cincinnati Gas 8 Electric Co.
P. 0. Box 960                                Troy 8 Conner, Esq.
                                                    ~
Cincinnati, Ohio 45201                      Conner, Moore & Cober 1747 Pennsylvania    Ave. N. WE Mr. William G. Porter, Jr.                  Washington, D. C, 20006 Porter, Stanley, Arthur, & Platt 37 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio    43215 Mr. Robert Killen, Chairman of the Board 8 Chief Executive Officer The Dayton Power & Light Company P. 0. Box 1034 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Mr. J. Robert Newlin, Counsel The Dayton Power & Light Company P. 0. Box 1034 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Mr. Stephen  Schumacher Miani Valley Power Project P. 0. Box 252 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Ms. Augusta  Price 601 Stanley Avenue Cincinnati,  Ohio  45226 Mr. James D. Flynn Manager, Licensing  8  Environmental  Affairs The Cincinnati Gas  &  Electric  Company P, 0. Box 960 Cincinnati,  Ohio  45201 Mr. J. P. Fenstermaker Senior Vice President    -, Operations Columbus 8  Southern Ohio    Electric  Co.
215 North Front  Street Columbus, Ohio    43215
APR g5 F8 Northern Indiana Public Service Company ATTN: Mr. H. P. Lyle, Vice President Electric Production 5 Engineering 5265 Holman Ave.
Hammond,  Indiana  46325 Meredith Hemphill, Jr. Esq.
Assistant General Counsel Bethlehem Steel Corporation Martin Tower Bethlehem, Pennsylvania    18016 William H. Eichhorn, Esq.
Eichhorn, Morrow 8 Eichhorn 5243 Hohman Avenue Hammond, Indiana  46320 Edward W. Osann,  Jr.,  Esq.
Wolfe, Hubbard, Leydid, Voit  & Osann, Ltd.
Suite 4600 One IBM  Plaza Chicago,  Illinois  60611 Marvin N. Berm, Esq ~
Special Assistant Attorney General 134 North LaSalle Street Suite 2222 Chicago,  Illinois  60602 Robert J. Vollen, Esq.
109 North Oearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60602


l.Agenda 2.Attendance List 3.Viewgraph Material cc: See Following Pages
Commonwealth Edison Company APR 2g )g78 A&i N;  Mr. Byron Lee,  Jr, Vice President P,  0. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 Richard E. Powell, Esq.
Isham, Lincoln & Beale One First National Plaza 2400" Chicago, Il 1 inoi s 60670


Long Island Lighting Company ATTN: Mr.Andrew W.Wofford Vice President 175 East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801 Edward M.Barrett, Esq.General Counsel Long Island Lighting Company 250 Old Country Road Mineola, New York 11501 Edward J.Walsh.Esq.General Attorney Long Island Lighting Company 250 Old Country Road Mineola, New York 11501 Mr.Thomas Burke Project Manager, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station P.0.Box 618 Wading River, New York 11792 Director, Technical Development Programs State of New York Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plazq Albany, New York 12223 Haward L.Blau Blau and Cohn, P.C.380 North Broadway jericho, New York 11753 Irving Like, Esq.Reilly, Like and Schnieder 200 West Main Street Babylon, New York 11702 MUB Technical Associates 366 California Avenue Suite 6 Palo Alto, California 94306<PR 25><78
APR 85 1978 Pennsylvania  Power and Light Company ATTN:   Mr. Norman W. Curtis Vice President - Engineering and Construction 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mr. Earle M. Mead Project Manager Pennsylvania Power  4I Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts, Trowbridge 5 Madden 1800 M Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20036 Mr. William E. Barberich Licensing Engineer Pennsylvania Power II Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mr. Robert J. Shovlin,    Project Manager Susquehanna Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Hubert, Barnes, Esq.
Pennsylvania Power  8  Light Company 901  Hamilton Street Allentown, Pennsylvania    18101 Edward M. Nagel, Esquire General  Counsel and Secretary Pennsylvania Power 8 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania,   18101


Philadelphi Electric Company ATTN: Mr.Edward G.Bauer, Jr.Vice President and General Counsel 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pensylvania 19101 Troy B, Conner, Jr.Ewq.Conner, Moore&Corber 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, D.C.20006 W.William Anderson, Esq.Deputy Attorney General Room 512, Main Capitol Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Frank R.Clokey, Esq.Special Assistant Attorney General Room 218, Towne House Apartments P.0.Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pensylvania 17105 Honorable Lawrence Coughlin House of Representatives Congress of the United States Washington, D.C.20515 Roger BE Reynolds, Jr., Esq.324 Swede Street Norristown, Pennsylvania 19401 Willard C.Hetzel, Esq.312 main Street East Greenville, Pennsylvania 18041 Lawrence Sager, Esq.Sager&Sager Associates 45 High Street Pottstown, Pennsylvania 19464 Joseph A.Smyth Assistant County Solicitor County of Montgomery Courthouse Norristown, Pennsylvania 19404 APR 25 1978 Eugene J.Bradley Philadelphia Electric Company Associate General Counsel 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101
Washington Public Power Supply System ATTN: Nr. Kneil 0. Strand            APR Bg )~78 Hanaging Oirector 3000 George Washington Way Richland Washington 99352 Joseph B. Knotts, Jr., Esq.
Oebevoise 5 Liberman 700 Shoreham Building 806  Fifteenth Street, N. W.
Washington,   O. C. 20005 Richard Q. Quigley, Esq.
Washington Public Power Supply System P. 0. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352


APR 25 1978 The Cincinnati Gas 8 Electric Company ATTN: Mr, Earl A, Borgmann Vice President-Engineering P.0.Box 960 Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 Mr.William J.Moran General Counsel The Cincinnati Gas 8 Electric Co.P.0.Box 960 Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 Mr.William G.Porter, Jr.Porter, Stanley, Arthur,&Platt 37 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 Mr.Robert Killen, Chairman of the Board 8 Chief Executive Officer The Dayton Power&Light Company P.0.Box 1034 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Mr.J.Robert Newlin, Counsel The Dayton Power&Light Company P.0.Box 1034 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Mr.Stephen Schumacher Miani Valley Power Project P.0.Box 252 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Ms.Augusta Price 601 Stanley Avenue Cincinnati, Ohio 45226 David B.Fankhauser, PhD 3569 Nine Mile Road Cincinnati, Ohio 45230 Thomas A.Luebbers, Esq.Cincinnati City Solicitor Room 214-City Hall Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Troy 8~Conner, Esq.Conner, Moore&Cober 1747 Pennsylvania Ave.N.WE Washington, D.C, 20006 Mr.James D.Flynn Manager, Licensing 8 Environmental Affairs The Cincinnati Gas&Electric Company P, 0.Box 960 Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 Mr.J.P.Fenstermaker Senior Vice President-, Operations Columbus 8 Southern Ohio Electric Co.215 North Front Street Columbus, Ohio 43215
Niagra Mohawk Power Corporation ATTN:   Mr. Jerald K. Rhode        ~~R ~~ 197s Vice President Engineering 300 Erie Boulavard West Syracuse  New  York  13202  .
Eugene  BE  Thomas, Jr.
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby    8 MacRae 1757  N Street,   N, W.
Washington,   D, C. 20036 Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.
Roisman, Kessler & Cashdan 1025 15th Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20036 Mr. Richard Goldsmith Syracuse University College of Law E. I. White Hall Campus Syracuse, New York 13210 T. K. DeBoer,   Director Technological Development Programs New York State Energy Office Swan  Street Building Core 1 - 2nd Floor Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223


Northern Indiana Public Service Company ATTN: Mr.H.P.Lyle, Vice President Electric Production 5 Engineering 5265 Holman Ave.Hammond, Indiana 46325 Meredith Hemphill, Jr.Esq.Assistant General Counsel Bethlehem Steel Corporation Martin Tower Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18016 William H.Eichhorn, Esq.Eichhorn, Morrow 8 Eichhorn 5243 Hohman Avenue Hammond, Indiana 46320 Edward W.Osann, Jr., Esq.Wolfe, Hubbard, Leydid, Voit&Osann, Ltd.Suite 4600 One IBM Plaza Chicago, Illinois 60611 Marvin N.Berm, Esq~Special Assistant Attorney General 134 North LaSalle Street Suite 2222 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Robert J.Vollen, Esq.109 North Oearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60602 APR g5 F8
0 Mark  II -  NRC Meeting'roposed APR 2g )978 Agenda Livermore  -  A  ril                5  1978 I. Livermore Fluid Structure Interaction Program A. SRV  Study B. Chugging Study II. Submerged    Structure Drag    Loads A. NRC  Questions B. DFFR Loads    for  Lead Plants San Jose  -  A  ril                6, 197S I. Monticello    SRY  - Mark  II Fluid  Structure Interaction Studies
'I. Pool Temperature      Limits  NRC Review Status III. DFFR Lead    Plant  SRY  Loads A. Philosophy B. Ramshead    Model IV. 4T FSI    -  Mark  II Program  to Devise Chugging Impulse          Load V. PSTF. Impact Load A. BNL  Study B. Plant Target Characteristics


Commonwealth Edison Company A&i N;Mr.Byron Lee, Jr, Vice President P, 0.Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 Richard E.Powell, Esq.Isham, Lincoln&Beale One First National Plaza 2400" Chicago, Il 1 inoi s 60670 APR 2g)g78
Lawrence Livermore Lab 4-5-78 Meeting Attendance NRC                              Nutech-MKI Owners K. S. Herring Abdel Hafiz                      N. W. Edwards T. M. Su Chris Grimes                      LLL C. Andes son G. S. Holman SSL                              S. C. Lu R. W. Martin C. N. Krishnawamy                W. E. Mason Frank J. Tokarz Bechtel R. E. Koppe Moe  Michail MIT Pa. Powers  Li ht  Com an Ain A. Sonin Peter Huber                      Howard  W. Holland BNL                              SRI Chee Tung                        George Abrahamsen C. Economus R. Scanlan                        EPRI C. Bienkowski George Maise                      John Carey EG5G H. T. Tang                        C. Y. Liaw V. M. Healter R. J. Muzzy L. H. Srauenholz J. E. Rogers R. F. McClelland L. J. Sobon


Pennsylvania Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr.Norman W.Curtis Vice President-Engineering and Construction 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mr.Earle M.Mead Project Manager Pennsylvania Power 4I Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Gerald Charnoff, Esq.Shaw, Pittman, Potts, Trowbridge 5 Madden 1800 M Street, N.W.Washington, D.C.20036 Mr.William E.Barberich Licensing Engineer Pennsylvania Power II Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mr.Robert J.Shovlin, Project Manager Susquehanna Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Hubert, Barnes, Esq.Pennsylvania Power 8 Light Company 901 Hamilton Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Edward M.Nagel, Esquire General Counsel and Secretary Pennsylvania Power 8 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18101 APR 85 1978
APR g8 )g)8 Attendance  List NRC/Mark  II Owners  Group April 6, 1978 Holiday Inn - San Jose,    CA General  Electric              CGE A. R. Smith                      H. C. Brinkmann H. T. Tang J. R. Martin L. H. Frauenholz                Pa. Power E  Li ht Com an R. J. Muzzy L. J. Sobon                      Howard  W. Holland R. E~ McClelland NSC NRC R. E. Koppe C. Anderson I. A. Peltier T. M. Su                        Bechtel C. I. Grimes A. Hafiz                        Jack Weyandt H. M. Schoenhoff D. M. O'onnor MIT P. W. Huber A. A. Sonin C. N. Krishna Swamy BNL LLL C. Tung C. Economos                      E. W. McCauley George Maise                    G. S. Holman R. H. Scanian R. Bienkowski


Washington Public Power Supply System ATTN: Nr.Kneil 0.Strand Hanaging Oirector 3000 George Washington Way Richland Washington 99352 Joseph B.Knotts, Jr., Esq.Oebevoise 5 Liberman 700 Shoreham Building 806 Fifteenth Street, N.W.Washington, O.C.20005 Richard Q.Quigley, Esq.Washington Public Power Supply System P.0.Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 APR Bg)~78
APR 2g >ging


Niagra Mohawk Power Corporation ATTN: Mr.Jerald K.Rhode Vice President Engineering 300 Erie Boulavard West Syracuse New York 13202.Eugene BE Thomas, Jr.LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby 8 MacRae 1757 N Street, N, W.Washington, D, C.20036 Anthony Z.Roisman, Esq.Roisman, Kessler&Cashdan 1025 15th Street, N.W.Washington, D.C.20036 Mr.Richard Goldsmith Syracuse University College of Law E.I.White Hall Campus Syracuse, New York 13210 T.K.DeBoer, Director Technological Development Programs New York State Energy Office Swan Street Building Core 1-2nd Floor Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223~~R~~197s 0
7D+ V)E~ o+ WOA'TICE <ZO 7dHUS
Mark II-NRC Meeting'roposed Agenda APR 2g)978 Livermore-A ril 5 1978 I.Livermore Fluid Structure Interaction Program A.SRV Study B.Chugging Study II.Submerged Structure Drag Loads A.NRC Questions B.DFFR Loads for Lead Plants San Jose-A ril 6, 197S I.Monticello SRY-Mark II Fluid Structure Interaction Studies'I.Pool Temperature Limits NRC Review Status III.DFFR Lead Plant SRY Loads A.Philosophy B.Ramshead Model IV.4T FSI-Mark II Program to Devise Chugging Impulse Load V.PSTF.Impact Load A.BNL Study B.Plant Target Characteristics
: d. SS-'s
      /
3'                                                      I I
i/
g-2                                                    /
I
                                                  /
                                                /
0
  -8'yp'
                    < .~'i~gp g  pl j'A @'c4f 5         Pf f -.- J 7( r )  ~r 7-gag                          H~r r i /


Lawrence Livermore Lab 4-5-78 Meeting Attendance NRC K.S.Herring Abdel Hafiz T.M.Su Chris Grimes C.Andes son SSL C.N.Krishnawamy Nutech-MKI Owners N.W.Edwards LLL G.S.Holman S.C.Lu R.W.Martin W.E.Mason Frank J.Tokarz R.E.Koppe MIT Ain A.Sonin Peter Huber Bechtel Moe Michail Pa.Powers Li ht Com an Howard W.Holland BNL SRI Chee Tung C.Economus R.Scanlan C.Bienkowski George Maise George Abrahamsen EPRI John Carey EG5G H.T.Tang V.M.Healter R.J.Muzzy L.H.Srauenholz J.E.Rogers R.F.McClelland L.J.Sobon C.Y.Liaw
I 4
5 12 18 23
                            '13v 3) 40 38 28 24 lu 15 21 FlhJI TE EL 2MEMT fwE 5 H O~          j de 7 okV S CA'>$ 5 -5E(rg gM


Attendance List NRC/Mark II Owners Group April 6, 1978 Holiday Inn-San Jose, CA APR g8)g)8 General Electric A.R.Smith H.T.Tang J.R.Martin L.H.Frauenholz R.J.Muzzy L.J.Sobon R.E~McClelland NRC C.Anderson I.A.Peltier T.M.Su C.I.Grimes A.Hafiz MIT P.W.Huber A.A.Sonin BNL C.Tung C.Economos George Maise R.H.Scanian R.Bienkowski CGE H.C.Brinkmann Pa.Power E Li ht Com an Howard W.Holland NSC R.E.Koppe Bechtel Jack Weyandt H.M.Schoenhoff D.M.O'onnor C.N.Krishna Swamy LLL E.W.McCauley G.S.Holman
o 0/   .o2 PP,E55UJE  HlsTokgzs vdwous    DA    pmeE: srgw in'


APR 2g>ging
pldeE Sr+Ainl goo                6oo OIAME7ER 7D 7HICKhlPS5 Jt/DA'<A L/FED p~AA. QorTo~
PEF$ 5Dg2    VhA~ ld TIARA/5'S P/~
/hill/3 L P~~SP EE5ponr5E '


7D+V)E~o+WOA'TICE<ZO 7dHUS
  /. 0                                      /N) UT 0                                      4> r'Q h
                                      ~
o  P/'~  =geo 0/~ =6&0
                        /
I I
I
                  /
I          \
I I
  ~
2        I                l I
                    ~  op      .o -  . ~ ~8    .ug
  --Z 0
4 7/h1E  CCRC g
  +g z<<V<E gzgzdr2iex F oH F4'4 VAPzdu~ 4/d .gw)S)-ni~zrglC h'7


d.SS-'s/3'I I g-2/i//I/0-8'yp'<.~'i~gp g pl j'A@'c4f 5 Pf f-.-J 7(r-)~r 7-gag H~r r i/
I Jl RI 5 I' MR 7R I C
I 5 4 12 lu 18 23 24 28'1 3v 3)40 38 15 21 FlhJI TE EL 2MEMT fwE 5 H O~j de 7 okV S CA'>$5-5E(rg gM
+--     ptlnlC      5'zg~th/
goo D/4 %2 7Eg    Td  78IC k'A/E5'g  >/Z
    /VDARALIZEQ pEsk'D~oW f'825 S V4E yAQ I3 yzonrZ VS INST'IA L. PHRASE ~z~powSZ


o 0/.o2 PP,E55UJE HlsTokgzs vdwous DA-pmeE: srgw in'  
A Q
tlC L)i pm'"                  117 I 7 IL ISL
                                                                                                        ~sl'"es            in  own  plane I$ 0
                      ~A0            IIC 137 LILI 115
          -.f" po                                Lll                                    LSC syrnetzy ~4          IZ b                  lane                          I lb                                                          150
      .1                                                    ll                  I 7,5 LW bII i
/                                                                      13 I S'I I ILL                                  LSC bl                                                                                                    I II b 7b 1%0                                  I'5 5 77 I Ii 7                          ICl 7l                                                                                        I 5 II 75                                                                                      III C                          L'Cl 71 7g                                                                                                        I51
  ~ I              70 IC0 CS                                                                      15l CO                                        R                          LS>j 0
CS              55 57 Sl SC SI So


pldeE Sr+Ainl goo OIAME7ER 7D 7HICKhlPS5 6oo Jt/DA'<A L/FED p~AA.QorTo~PEF$5Dg2 VhA~ld TIARA/5'S P/~-/hill/3 L P~~SP EE5ponr5E'
7 t3 <3 8< l 77 IC< 7 8'3 245 /gal g7f dt's 4'f3 ~f3 4A + ~ 5/ -514


0/.0~2 h/I I I/I I I I I\l/N)UT---4>r'Q-o-P/'~=geo~0/~=6&0~op.o-.~~8.ug--Z 4 0 7/h1E CCRC g+g z<<V<E gzgzdr2iex F oH F4'4 VAPzdu~4/d-.gw)S)-ni~zrglC h'7 I
/. 0 D.g
Jl RI 5 I'MR 7R I C--+--ptlnlC 5'zg~th/goo D/4%2 7Eg Td 78IC k'A/E5'g->/Z/VDARALI ZEQ pEsk'D~oW f'825 S V4E yAQ I3 yzonrZ VS-INST'IA L.PHRASE~z~powSZ
                          / \
O.g
                        /
                    /
                      /
A I
02                I             g
                /
              /
                          .o2        I- oQ
            ~
0/
(sec )
        ~g>ZSsugE H/SToR/ ZO g-4> ~oD Eg QfJOEL~ F145 7. FUcS E


A Q tlC L)i.1 IIC 115 syrnetzy~4 lane pm'"~A0-.f" po b 117 Lll IZ I 7 IL I lb ll I$0 ISL I 7,5 LSC 137~sl'"es in own plane LILI 150/i bl bII 7b 77 7l I S'I 13 1%0 I ILL LW I Ii 7 I II b I 5 II I'5 5 LSC ICl 7g~I 75 70 71 CS III C 15l I 5 1 IC0 L'Cl CS 55 CO R LS>j 0 SC 57 SI Sl So
L


7 t3<3 8<l 77 IC<7 8'3 245/gal g7f dt's 4'f3~f3 4A+~5/-514
/0 D]A~zr~R ro reick~zss  >re A/DjPMAL/ZE'g pZ3g BO~O~
    +He 55v<E yA< lA yzonts VS
        /Avoid L. PU~SE- <cSPoeSE


/.0 D.g O.g 02/\///A I I g//~0/.o2 I-oQ (sec)~g>ZSsugE H/SToR/ZO g-4>~oD Eg Qf JOEL~F145 7.FUcS E L!
    /0
/0 D]A~zr~R ro reick~zss->re A/DjPMAL/ZE'g pZ3g BO~O~+He 55v<E yA<lA yzonts VS-/Avoid L.PU~SE-<cSPoeSE
                                            /
lvauT I
h
                  ]t
                                        ~  D/p =o
                                                >/p = boo I
                                                                                    /1 I
I                                                                       l g     1 I                                                                I        1 I
            /       L I
a          ]          l y
'V        I                                                                  l I                                                                  I I                  L                                            I
~                                                                                               /
                          .l.:") X                  ~
1 v~           ~ p'
                                                                                            ~
o)
                                                                                              ~
0                       i    ~
l-w g~We      C sec)
                              ."-'..:;.5'$ .P,  8/5 Tarp) i1 T 80TT~,'-1 ~~~T~4 pg ~~c~f.-x t"g


/0/-lvauT--D/p=o a'V~0 h]t I I I/L]l y I I I~>/p=boo L.l.:")X 1~v~i~l-w~p'l I I/1 I I l g 1 I 1 I I/o)~~g~We C sec)."-'..:;.5'$.P, 8/5 Tarp)i1 T 80TT~,'-1~~~T~4 pg~~c~f.-x t"g
I (
I
      /
~png J


I (I/~png J
~ COWPER/5Oh/        7-O i.SC. JESMTS /S GocE>  . /-/oAIEvER, II/oz 8Clc}n/TITArlvEiY REPRESen/ra 7/VE I
~ woNE REHilsr/c Ex~Eh/5/oh/'5 s//oh/          i I
                                                  /
I
                    )
l i I
Coh/sag u8 7 i vE s
9EcPE~g'lhl($                                1 I
I ZPPECr OW FS/                                I ANR Z Y 7./ CS}/ EX'PER/n1Ze'7A L CoMPARISo4S SHoW 7/ME      P//'RSE  /.2//'8vroP. S/~/zcR.
7~ Ri<5-ID MSE A%PL/>uDE AMUSTgqzh/T 8 V~g PPED/C TEL lhl / ~E'X'/8 l 2 AC/~7 /-
puss    Eva zuw vv oaf


~COWPER/5Oh/
Sue~d,<}. (Co+To.3    .
7-O i.SC.JESMTS/S GocE>./-/oAIEvER, II/oz 8Clc}n/TITArlvEiY REPRESen/ra 7/VE~woNE REHilsr/c Ex~Eh/5/oh/'5 s//oh/9EcPE~g'lhl($
  ~ g~<  7TIE E/TE/VDED 8A'4L USES 3/t/D coMPA/l/Sacs 7o DATA IIVE>ICATE'&ATTie MONTICLE//-0 BANC84788k'S     YA L /Q I/ rr
)Coh/sag u8 7 i vE ZPPECr OW FS/I i/I I l i s I I 1 I I ANR Z Y 7./CS}/-EX'PER/n1Ze'7A L CoMPARISo4S SHoW-7/ME P//'RSE/.2//'8vroP.
S/~/zcR.7~Ri<5-ID MSE-A%PL/>uDE AMUSTgqzh/T 8 V~g PPED/C TEL lhl/~E'X'/8 l 2 AC/~7/-puss Eva zuw vv oaf


Sue~d,<}.(Co+To.3.~g~<7TIE E/TE/VDED 8A'4L USES 3/t/D coMPA/l/Sacs 7o DATA IIVE>ICATE'&AT Tie MONTICLE//-0 BANC 84788k'S YA L/Q I/rr b}}
b}}

Latest revision as of 18:44, 3 February 2020

Letter Responding to the April 6, 1978 Letter Requesting Additional Information Regarding a Request for an Extension of the Latest Completion Date for Construction Permit No. CPPR-112
ML18018A938
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/28/1978
From: Rhode G
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
To: Case E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML18018A938 (72)


Text

REGULATORY INFQRI'fATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

DISTRIBUTION FOR INCOMING MATERIAL 50-410 REC: CASE E G ORG: RHODE G K DOCDATE: 04/28/78 NRC NIAGARA MOHAWK PWR DATE RCVD: 05/Oi/78 DOCTYPE: LETTER NOTARIZED: NO COPIES RECEIVED

SUBJECT:

LTR 1 ENCL 1 INFO REQUESTED BY S. VARGA IN LTR DTD 04/06/78 RE: UTILITY REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF LATEST COMPLETION DATE FOR CPPR-112.

PLANT NAME: NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 REVIEWER INITIAL: XBT DISTRIBUTOR DISTRIBUTION OF THIS MATERIAL IS AS FOLLOWS INITIAL: ~

REQUESTS FOR EXEMPTIONS (ALL TYPES)

<DISTRIBUTIOI4 CODE B006)

FOR BR CHIEF VARGA+~~W/ENCL PROS MGR KANE++W/ENCL ACTION'OR LIC ASST SERVICE++W/ENCL INFO: MOQRE++LTR ONLY(i) REGAN++LTR ONLY(i)

FOR I l4FO: N . LY< 1) DUNCAN4+LTR ONLY< 1)

INTERNAL: REG FILE++W/EN NRC PDR++W/ENCL J MILLER>+W/ENCL T ABELL+4W/ENCL E. QASF ~/E'~M-EXTERNAL: LPDR S OSWEGO) NY+>W/ENCL ACRS CAT B4~~W/16 ENCL

'ISTRIBUTION: LTR 30 ENCL 26 "CONTROL NBR: 781210181 SIZE: 2P THE END

Ai 1

I A

h I

NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NIAGARA '~ MOHAWK 300 ERIE BOULEVARO, WEST SYRACUSE. N. Y. I 3202 April 28, 1978 8

Mr. Edson G. Case, Acting Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

~.", + p~

Washington, D. C. 20555 17

Dear Mr. Case:

Re: Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Docket No. 50-410 Enclosed is the additional information that Mr. Varga of your staff requested in a letter dated April 6, 1978 regarding the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation request for an extension of the latest completion date for Construction Permit No. CPPR-112. This information quantifies the extent of the delay associated with each of the three causes cited.

It also identifies on a time scale, the point at which the delay was incurred and the extent it alone affected the overall schedule for completion of the plant. The delays show good cause for extending the latest date of Construction Permit No. CPPR-112 to December 31, 1984.

Very truly yours, NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION Ger ld . Rhode, Vice President System Projec Management NLR/s zd Enclosure 781210)ag Soo< s(a+

I /g

.f'* < r 4C ~

l)1 .

p'

~ ~4/ )44 p'

1 I

)

4 ll l

I

7/73 I/74 7/74 I/75 7/75 i/76 7/76 7/77 I/77 I/78 7/78 I/79 7/79 CP ISSUE 7 74 CP EXPIRATI N 7/78 (2)

13) i (3) iii
3) iv (3 (3)v (3 vi 3)vii (3)viii (3)i (3)x DELAYCAUSE DATE OF DELAY DURATION OF DELAY DELAY CAUSE DATE OF DELAY DURATION OF DELAY (I) NEED FOR POWER POSTPONED DEC. I s 1973 72 MO. vii DELAY IN GRANTING ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION JUI I, 1973 12 MO.

PERMIT (2) LACK OF FUNDS AT REASONABLE RATES NOV. I s 1974 12 MO. viii IMPLEMENTATIONOF NRC REQUIREMENT FOR ECCS OCT. I, 1973 IO MO.

PUMP FLOOD PROTECTION (3) i MARK 3E LAR DESIGN CHANGES SEP. I, 1976 12 MO.

ix IMPLEMENTATIONOF PIPE WHIP PROTECTION MAY I, 1973 12 MO.

il STUDY OF GEOLOGICAL FEATURES DEC. 13s 1976 12 Ma REQUNIEMENTS OF RG. 1.46 iii CHANGE FROM ONCE-THROUGH TO CLOSED JUL. 19s 1976 4 MO. x RG.1.89 CLASS IE EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS. NOV. I, 1974 6 MO.

LOOP COOLING iv ELECTRICAL RACEWAY AND REACTOR BUILDING JAN I s 1975 9 MO.

STRUCTURAL REDESIGN v LABOR PROBLEMS NCLUDDIG WORK STOPPAGES JUN. I s ISN OCT I sl977 3 MO.

I MO.

CONSTRUCTION DELAYS vi WELDER DELAYS SHORTAGE AND MATERIALPROCUREMENT DEC. I s 1977 12 MO.

NINE MILE POINT, UNIT 2

TELECOPIED TO N 0 A QW 5f H- C (

FROA TIViE y

Q;PP

/~ ~

DC.TE

~at.m

/~la- ~~/

f<

~C+

~r I EOII(

Wp UNITED STATES O~

A.

NUC R REGULATORY COMMISSION 0 REGION I 631 PARK AVENUE C>

KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA I 9406 n qo 4+*+ 4 Docket No. 50-410 g 6 APR l978 DRAVO Corporation Pipe Fabrication Division ATTN: Mr. Gustav Schwab Vice President and General Manager 1115 Gilman Avenue Marietta, Ohio 45750 Gentlemen:

Subject:

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Report of January 30, 1978 Regarding the Dravo Pipe Fabrication Division guality Assurance Program Me received your letter of April 7, 1978, concerning the subject report. Your letter will 'be made a part of the public record as you requested.

Sincerely, I

Bo ce H. Gr ier Director

1(

'il

iff:I:I lfff, Sf'lf Wuy I APR 25 )978 f1OC ~ l." l I I p IIPC f"ilf?

Loca I l'tll:

TIC Ilf?R Re1din.f I.!lf?-: I f i I .

(,a-o P, . I'>o'",. I R. 1}@Youl',~l I). '/as-.-11 I'l Stol z K. Kni el

0. I)111 s il rljfl I.. Crocf:r ~

I). Cl ul.ch.'

Hi I I ia":

I? fly t tsr>l ~

If. I)! nf.oil I). I'll I el I l'0 ) eC t "il>> 1'l>> ~

I. Peltier I I I} .'tf:nrn~y, H'. I:o>>

ii(3i nCPS 1

(16)

L. =1)ref ler ill? C I'al l. I < i; l ~

l -.: C. Grimes Ruf>en% l >> 'I C. Anderson R. Tedesco T. Su G. Lainas K. Herring J. Knight A. Hafiz

d d~

a

~p,s Abc' UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 "vA APR 25 j978

<<>>*++

Docket Nos: 50-358 50-387 50-352/353 50-367 50-373/374 50-388 50-410 50-322

(

APPLICANT; MEMBERS OF MARK II OWNER'S GROUP

SUBJECT:

TRIP TO LIVERMORE, STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND GENERAL ELECTRIC TO DISCUSS MARK II POOL DYNAMIC LOADS

~kkdd The purpose of this trip was to discuss several analytical and experimental programs related'o Mark II pool dynamic loads. A copy of the attendees, agenda and slides distributed at the meeting are attached.

In the morning of the first day (Wednesday) we met with Livermore personnel to discuss the Livermore/DOR program to study fluid structure interactions (FSI) in the Mark-I Monticello Safety Relief Valve (SRV) tests.

a Wednesday afternoon we met with personnel at Stanford Research Institute to discuss their 1/13 scale Mark II pool swell tests.

Thursday we met with representatives of the Mark II owner's group and General Electric to discuss the status of several tasks in their Mark II pool dynamic load program. A summary of -the topics discussed in the meetings is provided below.

~Sumar Livermore Meetin Ed McCauley of Livermore summarized the results of the FY 77 Livermore FSI program. Their study of SRV-FSI effects showed a trend of decreasing loads with increasing wall flexibility. The major limitations of their study included the plane section modeling of the containment and the modeling of the source. These assumptions result in an over-estimate of the dependence of SRV loads on wall flexibility. Future studies by Livermore are aimed at evaluating the importance of these parameters.

h APR 35 ]g7g Standford Research Institute Meetin The purpose of this meeting was to discuss the preliminary results of the'Mark II 1/13 scale single vent tests. These SRI tests consisted of air charging tests. .Shakedown tests were conducted to determine the affect of water vapor in scale air tests on pool swell phenomenon.

The preliminary results for the SRI tests showed differences from similar tests conducted at MIT. The purpose of the meeting was to identify reasons for the differences. Additional SRI testing was

.discussed to resolve differences in results. Hhi'le at the SRI facility we toured the pool dynamic test stands. Me noted that SRI is conducting EPRI funded tests to investigate steam chugging phenomena. Tests are being conducted at three different scales including single and multivent tests. This test program is a study of the fundamental phenomena of chugging. This program is not a par t of the Mark II owner group supporting program.

Mark II Owner's Grou Meetin The topics discussed in this meeting are listed in the attached meeting agenda. A summary of discussion follows:

1. Monticello SRV - Mark II Fluid Structure Interaction Studies Or. H. Tang of General Electric discussed the results of studies at GE to determine the effect of containment wall flexibility on the measured SRV loads in the Monticello tests. GE performed calculations similar to those performed by Livermore. Their plane strain calculations utilized similar assumptions of containment rigidity and load source to those performed by Livermore. Under these conditions they observed the same trend of reducing load with increasing wall flexibility as observed in the Livermore studies.

However, the GE studies were extended to include axisymmetric calculations, 3D modeling of a torus segment and a multiple pulse source. Results of these studies show that wall flexibility amplifies the loads. This conclusion contradicts the Livermore 2D study. In addition they conducted analytical-experimental comparisons using their model and the Monticello data. The use of the more realistic assumptions in the analytical model substantiated the Mark II owner's claim that the Monticello benchmark is valid.

The Monticello FSI study is now considered complete by the Mark II owner's group. Documentation will be provided to the NRC by the end of May 1978,

In our March meeting with the Mark II owner's group we discussed the desirability of formulating a conservative chugging impulse load to resolve 4 T FSI questions. Dr. Healzer of General Electric discussed their plan for this task. They should complete this study by early June 1978. A status report will be provided at the next Mark II owner's meeting.

This meeting is tentatively scheduled for mid May 1978, In addition we requested that Dr. Healzer provide us, within the next few'eeks, an outline of the objective of this task.

3. SRV Pool Tem erature Limits T. Su of NRC provided an NRC status report on the issue of SRV pool temperature limits. He stated that based on our current review of the small scale tests there is inadequate supporting data to justify the current pool temperature limits for rams-head relief valve devices. As a result of our review we are preparing an NRC position requiring the use of quencher type devices in Mark II plants since these devices have higher pool temperature limits.
4. DFFR Lead Plant SRV Loads T. Su of NRC provided a status report on the NRC review of the Mark II ramshead model. He highlighted several deficiencies in the current model. We also discussed the use of the ramshead model for those lead plants which have committed to a switch from a ramshead to a quencher device. H. Brinkman representing the Mark II owner's group stated that their plans are to use the current ramshead model to predict SRV loads for plants with quencher devices.

Test programs are being developed to show that the use of these ramshead loads for quencher devices is a conservative approach.

Current plans call for completion of the confirmatory tests prior to operation of the first Mark II plant.

5, PSTF Im act Loads G. Maise of BNL outlined the results of the NRC evaluation of Mark II Pool Dynamic - impact loads. This study concluded that the current DFFR impact load specification is inadequate in that

4 APR 2g ]97B the impulse load specification does not include a conservative pulse duration. In addition no consideration has been given to the affect of target geometry on the impact load. The Mark II owner's stated that they had not had sufficient time to review the basis for our conclusions nor the impact of this potential load modification on equipment in specific Mark II plants. Their preliminary review of the BNL study has not uncovered any deficiences in the BNL study. However, conservatisms in the current impact load specification could be balanced against these recently identified non conservatisms. At the next Mark II owner's meeting in mid-May the Mark II owners will provide us their evaluation of the BNL study and a review of the impact of this load modification on specific Mark II plants.

g.(<,6 I. Peltier, Project Manager Light Hater Reactors Branch No. 1 Division of Project Management

Enclosures:

l. Agenda
2. Attendance List
3. Viewgraph Material cc: See Following Pages

Long Island Lighting Company <PR 25 ><78 ATTN: Mr. Andrew W. Wofford Vice President 175 East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801 Edward M. Barrett, Esq.

General Counsel Long Island Lighting Company 250 Old Country Road Mineola, New York 11501 Edward J. Walsh. Esq.

General Attorney Long Island Lighting Company 250 Old Country Road Mineola, New York 11501 Mr. Thomas Burke Project Manager, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station P. 0. Box 618 Wading River, New York 11792 Director, Technical Development Programs State of New York Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plazq Albany, New York 12223 Haward L. Blau Blau and Cohn, P. C.

380 North Broadway jericho, New York 11753 Irving Like, Esq.

Reilly, Like and Schnieder 200 West Main Street Babylon, New York 11702 MUB Technical Associates 366 California Avenue Suite 6 Palo Alto, California 94306

APR 25 1978 Philadelphi Electric Company Eugene J. Bradley ATTN: Mr. Edward G. Bauer, Jr. Philadelphia Electric Company Vice President and General Associate General Counsel Counsel 2301 Market Street 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Philadelphia, Pensylvania 19101 Troy B, Conner, Jr. Ewq.

Conner, Moore & Corber 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20006 W. William Anderson, Esq.

Deputy Attorney General Room 512, Main Capitol Building Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Frank R. Clokey, Esq.

Special Assistant Attorney General Room 218, Towne House Apartments P. 0. Box 2063 Harrisburg, Pensylvania 17105 Honorable Lawrence Coughlin House of Representatives Congress of the United States Washington, D. C. 20515 Roger BE Reynolds, Jr., Esq.

324 Swede Street Norristown, Pennsylvania 19401 Willard C. Hetzel, Esq.

312 main Street East Greenville, Pennsylvania 18041 Lawrence Sager, Esq.

Sager & Sager Associates 45 High Street Pottstown, Pennsylvania 19464 Joseph A. Smyth Assistant County Solicitor County of Montgomery Courthouse Norristown, Pennsylvania 19404

APR 25 1978 The Cincinnati Gas 8 Electric Company David B. Fankhauser, PhD ATTN: Mr, Earl A, Borgmann 3569 Nine Mile Road Vice President - Engineering Cincinnati, Ohio 45230 P. 0. Box 960 Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 Thomas A. Luebbers, Esq.

Cincinnati City Solicitor Mr. William J. Moran Room 214 - City Hall General Counsel Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 The Cincinnati Gas 8 Electric Co.

P. 0. Box 960 Troy 8 Conner, Esq.

~

Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 Conner, Moore & Cober 1747 Pennsylvania Ave. N. WE Mr. William G. Porter, Jr. Washington, D. C, 20006 Porter, Stanley, Arthur, & Platt 37 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 Mr. Robert Killen, Chairman of the Board 8 Chief Executive Officer The Dayton Power & Light Company P. 0. Box 1034 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Mr. J. Robert Newlin, Counsel The Dayton Power & Light Company P. 0. Box 1034 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Mr. Stephen Schumacher Miani Valley Power Project P. 0. Box 252 Dayton, Ohio 45401 Ms. Augusta Price 601 Stanley Avenue Cincinnati, Ohio 45226 Mr. James D. Flynn Manager, Licensing 8 Environmental Affairs The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company P, 0. Box 960 Cincinnati, Ohio 45201 Mr. J. P. Fenstermaker Senior Vice President -, Operations Columbus 8 Southern Ohio Electric Co.

215 North Front Street Columbus, Ohio 43215

APR g5 F8 Northern Indiana Public Service Company ATTN: Mr. H. P. Lyle, Vice President Electric Production 5 Engineering 5265 Holman Ave.

Hammond, Indiana 46325 Meredith Hemphill, Jr. Esq.

Assistant General Counsel Bethlehem Steel Corporation Martin Tower Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18016 William H. Eichhorn, Esq.

Eichhorn, Morrow 8 Eichhorn 5243 Hohman Avenue Hammond, Indiana 46320 Edward W. Osann, Jr., Esq.

Wolfe, Hubbard, Leydid, Voit & Osann, Ltd.

Suite 4600 One IBM Plaza Chicago, Illinois 60611 Marvin N. Berm, Esq ~

Special Assistant Attorney General 134 North LaSalle Street Suite 2222 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Robert J. Vollen, Esq.

109 North Oearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60602

Commonwealth Edison Company APR 2g )g78 A&i N; Mr. Byron Lee, Jr, Vice President P, 0. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 Richard E. Powell, Esq.

Isham, Lincoln & Beale One First National Plaza 2400" Chicago, Il 1 inoi s 60670

APR 85 1978 Pennsylvania Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr. Norman W. Curtis Vice President - Engineering and Construction 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mr. Earle M. Mead Project Manager Pennsylvania Power 4I Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Gerald Charnoff, Esq.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts, Trowbridge 5 Madden 1800 M Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20036 Mr. William E. Barberich Licensing Engineer Pennsylvania Power II Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Mr. Robert J. Shovlin, Project Manager Susquehanna Pennsylvania Power 5 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Hubert, Barnes, Esq.

Pennsylvania Power 8 Light Company 901 Hamilton Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Edward M. Nagel, Esquire General Counsel and Secretary Pennsylvania Power 8 Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18101

Washington Public Power Supply System ATTN: Nr. Kneil 0. Strand APR Bg )~78 Hanaging Oirector 3000 George Washington Way Richland Washington 99352 Joseph B. Knotts, Jr., Esq.

Oebevoise 5 Liberman 700 Shoreham Building 806 Fifteenth Street, N. W.

Washington, O. C. 20005 Richard Q. Quigley, Esq.

Washington Public Power Supply System P. 0. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352

Niagra Mohawk Power Corporation ATTN: Mr. Jerald K. Rhode ~~R ~~ 197s Vice President Engineering 300 Erie Boulavard West Syracuse New York 13202 .

Eugene BE Thomas, Jr.

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby 8 MacRae 1757 N Street, N, W.

Washington, D, C. 20036 Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.

Roisman, Kessler & Cashdan 1025 15th Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20036 Mr. Richard Goldsmith Syracuse University College of Law E. I. White Hall Campus Syracuse, New York 13210 T. K. DeBoer, Director Technological Development Programs New York State Energy Office Swan Street Building Core 1 - 2nd Floor Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223

0 Mark II - NRC Meeting'roposed APR 2g )978 Agenda Livermore - A ril 5 1978 I. Livermore Fluid Structure Interaction Program A. SRV Study B. Chugging Study II. Submerged Structure Drag Loads A. NRC Questions B. DFFR Loads for Lead Plants San Jose - A ril 6, 197S I. Monticello SRY - Mark II Fluid Structure Interaction Studies

'I. Pool Temperature Limits NRC Review Status III. DFFR Lead Plant SRY Loads A. Philosophy B. Ramshead Model IV. 4T FSI - Mark II Program to Devise Chugging Impulse Load V. PSTF. Impact Load A. BNL Study B. Plant Target Characteristics

Lawrence Livermore Lab 4-5-78 Meeting Attendance NRC Nutech-MKI Owners K. S. Herring Abdel Hafiz N. W. Edwards T. M. Su Chris Grimes LLL C. Andes son G. S. Holman SSL S. C. Lu R. W. Martin C. N. Krishnawamy W. E. Mason Frank J. Tokarz Bechtel R. E. Koppe Moe Michail MIT Pa. Powers Li ht Com an Ain A. Sonin Peter Huber Howard W. Holland BNL SRI Chee Tung George Abrahamsen C. Economus R. Scanlan EPRI C. Bienkowski George Maise John Carey EG5G H. T. Tang C. Y. Liaw V. M. Healter R. J. Muzzy L. H. Srauenholz J. E. Rogers R. F. McClelland L. J. Sobon

APR g8 )g)8 Attendance List NRC/Mark II Owners Group April 6, 1978 Holiday Inn - San Jose, CA General Electric CGE A. R. Smith H. C. Brinkmann H. T. Tang J. R. Martin L. H. Frauenholz Pa. Power E Li ht Com an R. J. Muzzy L. J. Sobon Howard W. Holland R. E~ McClelland NSC NRC R. E. Koppe C. Anderson I. A. Peltier T. M. Su Bechtel C. I. Grimes A. Hafiz Jack Weyandt H. M. Schoenhoff D. M. O'onnor MIT P. W. Huber A. A. Sonin C. N. Krishna Swamy BNL LLL C. Tung C. Economos E. W. McCauley George Maise G. S. Holman R. H. Scanian R. Bienkowski

APR 2g >ging

7D+ V)E~ o+ WOA'TICE <ZO 7dHUS

d. SS-'s

/

3' I I

i/

g-2 /

I

/

/

0

-8'yp'

< .~'i~gp g pl j'A @'c4f 5 Pf f -.- J 7( r ) ~r 7-gag H~r r i /

I 4

5 12 18 23

'13v 3) 40 38 28 24 lu 15 21 FlhJI TE EL 2MEMT fwE 5 H O~ j de 7 okV S CA'>$ 5 -5E(rg gM

o 0/ .o2 PP,E55UJE HlsTokgzs vdwous DA pmeE: srgw in'

pldeE Sr+Ainl goo 6oo OIAME7ER 7D 7HICKhlPS5 Jt/DA'<A L/FED p~AA. QorTo~

PEF$ 5Dg2 VhA~ ld TIARA/5'S P/~

/hill/3 L P~~SP EE5ponr5E '

/. 0 /N) UT 0 4> r'Q h

~

o P/'~ =geo 0/~ =6&0

/

I I

I

/

I \

I I

~

2 I l I

~ op .o - . ~ ~8 .ug

--Z 0

4 7/h1E CCRC g

+g z<<V<E gzgzdr2iex F oH F4'4 VAPzdu~ 4/d .gw)S)-ni~zrglC h'7

I Jl RI 5 I' MR 7R I C

+-- ptlnlC 5'zg~th/

goo D/4 %2 7Eg Td 78IC k'A/E5'g >/Z

/VDARALIZEQ pEsk'D~oW f'825 S V4E yAQ I3 yzonrZ VS INST'IA L. PHRASE ~z~powSZ

A Q

tlC L)i pm'" 117 I 7 IL ISL

~sl'"es in own plane I$ 0

~A0 IIC 137 LILI 115

-.f" po Lll LSC syrnetzy ~4 IZ b lane I lb 150

.1 ll I 7,5 LW bII i

/ 13 I S'I I ILL LSC bl I II b 7b 1%0 I'5 5 77 I Ii 7 ICl 7l I 5 II 75 III C L'Cl 71 7g I51

~ I 70 IC0 CS 15l CO R LS>j 0

CS 55 57 Sl SC SI So

7 t3 <3 8< l 77 IC< 7 8'3 245 /gal g7f dt's 4'f3 ~f3 4A + ~ 5/ -514

/. 0 D.g

/ \

O.g

/

/

/

A I

02 I g

/

/

.o2 I- oQ

~

0/

(sec )

~g>ZSsugE H/SToR/ ZO g-4> ~oD Eg QfJOEL~ F145 7. FUcS E

L

/0 D]A~zr~R ro reick~zss >re A/DjPMAL/ZE'g pZ3g BO~O~

+He 55v<E yA< lA yzonts VS

/Avoid L. PU~SE- <cSPoeSE

/0

/

lvauT I

h

]t

~ D/p =o

>/p = boo I

/1 I

I l g 1 I I 1 I

/ L I

a ] l y

'V I l I I I L I

~ /

.l.:") X ~

1 v~ ~ p'

~

o)

~

0 i ~

l-w g~We C sec)

."-'..:;.5'$ .P, 8/5 Tarp) i1 T 80TT~,'-1 ~~~T~4 pg ~~c~f.-x t"g

I (

I

/

~png J

~ COWPER/5Oh/ 7-O i.SC. JESMTS /S GocE> . /-/oAIEvER, II/oz 8Clc}n/TITArlvEiY REPRESen/ra 7/VE I

~ woNE REHilsr/c Ex~Eh/5/oh/'5 s//oh/ i I

/

I

)

l i I

Coh/sag u8 7 i vE s

9EcPE~g'lhl($ 1 I

I ZPPECr OW FS/ I ANR Z Y 7./ CS}/ EX'PER/n1Ze'7A L CoMPARISo4S SHoW 7/ME P//'RSE /.2//'8vroP. S/~/zcR.

7~ Ri<5-ID MSE A%PL/>uDE AMUSTgqzh/T 8 V~g PPED/C TEL lhl / ~E'X'/8 l 2 AC/~7 /-

puss Eva zuw vv oaf

Sue~d,<}. (Co+To.3 .

~ g~< 7TIE E/TE/VDED 8A'4L USES 3/t/D coMPA/l/Sacs 7o DATA IIVE>ICATE'&ATTie MONTICLE//-0 BANC84788k'S YA L /Q I/ rr

b