ML061320225: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML061320225
| number = ML061320225
| issue date = 03/02/2006
| issue date = 03/02/2006
| title = E-mail from J. White of Usnrc to Tbrice@Gw.Dec.State.Ny.Us; and Waxelso@Entergy.Com, Regarding Compilation of Sample Results
| title = E-mail from J. White of USNRC to Tbrice@Gw.Dec.State.Ny.Us; and Waxelso@Entergy.Com, Regarding Compilation of Sample Results
| author name = White J R
| author name = White J
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS
| addressee name = Axelson W L, Rice T B
| addressee name = Axelson W, Rice T
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc, State of NY, Dept of Environmental Conservation
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc, State of NY, Dept of Environmental Conservation
| docket = 05000003, 05000247, 05000286
| docket = 05000003, 05000247, 05000286
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:lfJohn White -Compilation of samDle results Paae 1 d-,-H --- ------ ---From: To: Date:  
{{#Wiki_filter:lfJohn White -- Compilation
                ,-H . ---
of samDle results Paae 1 d From:                 John White To:                   Tbrice@gw.dec.state.ny.us; Waxelso~entergy.com Date:                 3/2/06 5:19PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
John White Tbrice@gw.dec.state.ny.us; Waxelso~entergy.com 3/2/06 5:19PM Compilation of sample results The attached is our compilation of the sample data. Please review to assure accuracy of the data presented.
Compilation of sample results The attached is our compilation of the sample data. Please review to assure accuracy of the data presented. We are planning to make the attach this table to the NRC inspection report.
We are planning to make the attach this table to the NRC inspection report.CC: James Kottan; James Noggle Ail John White -Indian Point Analytical Result Rev3.wpd I-~ PageI~ATTACHMENT 1 Indian Point Analytical Results Comparison Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Ucensee Result Compared to Resultl milliliter) milliliter)
CC:                   James Kottan; James Noggle Ail
NRC Result) (microCuries per milliliter Unit 1 Sphere Foundation Co-58 (-5+/-24)E-10  
 
<8E-8 Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with Drain Sump 10/19/2005 Co-60 (-8+/-23)E-10  
I John White - Indian Point Analytical Result Rev3.wpd                                         -~                                                 PageI~
<8E-8 Not Detected/No Comparison New York Cs-134 (-1.9+/-2.3)E-9  
ATTACHMENT 1 Indian Point Analytical Results Comparison Sample ID       Radionuclide       NRC Result               Indian Pt. Result             Comparison           State of New York (microCuries per             (microCuries per       (Ucensee Result Compared to       Result l        milliliter)                 milliliter)               NRC Result)           (microCuries per milliliter Unit 1 Sphere Foundation   Co-58           (-5+/-24)E-10                     <8E-8           Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with Drain Sump 10/19/2005     Co-60           (-8+/-23)E-10                     <8E-8           Not Detected/No Comparison       New York Cs-134         (-1.9+/-2.3)E-9                     <1 E-7           Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137           (9+/-22)E-10                     <1 E-7           Not Detected/No Comparison H-3           (5.7+/-2.6)E-7                 (8.53+/-?)E-7                 Agreement Sr-90         (-0.2+/-1.2)E-9                 Not Analyzed         Not Detected/No Comparison Unit 1 West Spent Fuel   Co-58             (-5+/-18)E-7                     <2E-6           -Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with Pool             Co-60         (2.98+/-0.35)E-5               (3.76+/-0.32)E-5               Agreement               New York 10/20/2005         Cs-134             (2+/-14)E-7                     <2E-6           Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137         (6.74+/-0.22)E-3               (8.13+/-0.04)E-3               Agreement H-3         (4.18+/-0.72)E-4                 (4.16+/-?)E-4'               No Comparison 2
<1 E-7 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (9+/-22)E-10  
(3.27+/-?)E-4               No Comparison Sr-90       (1.300+/-0.035)E-4                 Not Analyzed               No Comparison Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool   Co-58         (3.46+/-0.16)E-4               (3.33+/-0.0.06)E-4               Agreement           Sample not Split with 10/21/2005         Co-60         (7.95+/-0.28)E-4               (7.99+/-0.08)E-4               Agreement               New York Cs-134         (8.57+/-0.31)E-4             (1.031+/-0.0.008)E-3               Agreement Cs-137       (1.319+/-0.046)E-3             (1.586+/-0.012)E-3               Agreement 3
<1 E-7 Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (5.7+/-2.6)E-7 (8.53+/-?)E-7 Agreement Sr-90 (-0.2+/-1.2)E-9 Not Analyzed Not Detected/No Comparison Unit 1 West Spent Fuel Co-58 (-5+/-18)E-7  
H-3       (2.929+/-0.083)E-2                 (2.52+/-?)E-2               No Comparison Sr-90         (5.87+/-0.24)E-6                 Not Analyzed               No Comparison
<2E-6 -Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with Pool Co-60 (2.98+/-0.35)E-5 (3.76+/-0.32)E-5 Agreement New York 10/20/2005 Cs-134 (2+/-14)E-7  
 
<2E-6 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (6.74+/-0.22)E-3 (8.13+/-0.04)E-3 Agreement H-3 (4.18+/-0.72)E-4 (4.16+/-?)E-4' No Comparison (3.27+/-?)E-4 2  No Comparison Sr-90 (1.300+/-0.035)E-4 Not Analyzed No Comparison Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool Co-58 (3.46+/-0.16)E-4 (3.33+/-0.0.06)E-4 Agreement Sample not Split with 10/21/2005 Co-60 (7.95+/-0.28)E-4 (7.99+/-0.08)E-4 Agreement New York Cs-134 (8.57+/-0.31)E-4 (1.031+/-0.0.008)E-3 Agreement Cs-137 (1.319+/-0.046)E-3 (1.586+/-0.012)E-3 Agreement H-3 (2.929+/-0.083)E-2 (2.52+/-?)E-2 3  No Comparison Sr-90 (5.87+/-0.24)E-6 Not Analyzed No Comparison John White -Indian Point Analytical Result Rev3.wqd____ Page ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 2 of 7)Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to Result milliliter) milliliter)
John White - Indian Point Analytical Result Rev3.wqd                                    ____                                        Page 2j ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 2 of 7)
NRC Result) (microCuries per milliliter)
Sample ID         Radionuclide       NRC Result     Indian Pt. Result             Comparison         State of New York (microCuries per   (microCuries per   (Licensee Result Compared to       Result milliliter)       milliliter)           NRC Result)         (microCuries per milliliter)
Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool Co-58 (2.4+/-3.4)E-9  
Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool       Co-58         (2.4+/-3.4)E-9           <5E-8       Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with Wall Leak             Co-60       (4.56+/-0.49)E-8           <8E-8               No Comparison           New York 10/24/2005           Cs-134       (2.64+/-0.1 2)E-7       (3.6+/-0.8)E-7             Disagreement Cs-137       (4.88+/-0.15)E-6     (4.73+/-0.24)E-6               Agreement H-3       (2.208+/-0.047)E-2       (2.1 9+/-?)E-2               Agreement Sr-90       (3.70+/-0.12)E-7       Not Analyzed             No Comparison Unit 1 North Curtain Drain   Co-58         (-1.4+/-1 .8)E-9                                                   Sample not Split with Composite           Co-60           (0.0+/-2.1)E-9                                                         New York 10/21/2005           Cs-134         (-6+/-19)E-10 Cs-137       (4.48+/-0.42)E-8 H-3       (1.425+/-0.053)E-5 Sr-90       (9.97+/-0.42)E-8       Not Analyzed             No Comparison Monitoring Well         Co-58         (2.7+/-4.3)E-9         <5E-944       Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with MW-11               Co-60         (3.5+/-3.1)E-9           <2E-9 4     Not Detected/No Comparison       New York 9/29/2005           Cs-134         (-5+/-39)E-10           <4E-94       Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137         (-9+/-29)E-10           <4E-94       Not Detected/No Comparison H-3       (2.168+/-0.028)E-4       (2.07+/-?)E-4               Agreement (2.1 16+/-0.008)E-44             Agreement Sr-90         (1.4+/-1 .2)2-9     Not Analyzed     Not Detected/No ComParison
<5E-8 Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with Wall Leak Co-60 (4.56+/-0.49)E-8  
 
<8E-8 No Comparison New York 10/24/2005 Cs-134 (2.64+/-0.1 2)E-7 (3.6+/-0.8)E-7 Disagreement Cs-137 (4.88+/-0.15)E-6 (4.73+/-0.24)E-6 Agreement H-3 (2.208+/-0.047)E-2 (2.1 9+/-?)E-2 Agreement Sr-90 (3.70+/-0.12)E-7 Not Analyzed No Comparison Unit 1 North Curtain Drain Co-58 (-1.4+/-1 .8)E-9 Sample not Split with Composite Co-60 (0.0+/-2.1)E-9 New York 10/21/2005 Cs-134 (-6+/-19)E-10 Cs-137 (4.48+/-0.42)E-8 H-3 (1.425+/-0.053)E-5 Sr-90 (9.97+/-0.42)E-8 Not Analyzed No Comparison Monitoring Well Co-58 (2.7+/-4.3)E-9  
                                      --     -                                                           -.-   -     1-- - ---          -j Jlo White Indian Point Analvical Result Rev3.wpd                                                                                         Paqe 31 ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 3 of 7)
<5E-944 Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with MW-11 Co-60 (3.5+/-3.1)E-9  
Sample ID       Radionuclide       NRC Result           Indian Pt. Result           Comparison             State of New York (microCuries per       (microCuries per   (Licensee Result Compared to           Result milliliter)           milliliter)             NRC Result)             (microCuries per l_         l                                                                                       milliliter)
<2E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison New York 9/29/2005 Cs-134 (-5+/-39)E-10  
Monitoring Well       Co-58           (-7+/-23)E-10               <6E-8 4         Not Detected/No Comparison   Sample not Split with MW-il1             Co-60           (1.8+/-2.2)E-9             <4E-8 4         Not Detected/No Comparison         New York 10/14/2005         Cs-134           (1.9+/-2.2)E-9             <4E-8 4         Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137         (-2.1i+/-3.6)E-9             <5E-8 4         Not Detected/No Comparison H-3         (7.29+/-0.41 )E-6         (6.82+/-?)E-6               Agreement Sr-90           (1.1+/-1.3)E-9           Not Analyzed       Not Detected/No Comparison Monitoring Well     Co-58           (-1.5+/-3.7)E-9             <3E-9 4         Not Detected/No Comparison MW-38             Co-60           (0.3+/-3.3)E-9               <3E-94          Not Detected/No Comparison 12/8/2005         Cs-134         (4.4+/-3.3)E-9               <3E-94          Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137         (-0.7+/-3.0)E-9             <3E-94          Not Detected/No Comparison H-3           (7.4+/-1 .3)E-7         (9.8+/-2.9)E-7 4             Agreement                 (7.0+/-1 .2)E-7 Sr-90         (0.4+/-1.2)E-9             <1.25E-85        Not Detected/No Comparison Monitoring Well     Co-58           (-0.2+/-3.1)E-9             <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison MW-101           Co-60           (2.5t3.6)E-9               <4E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison 12/8/2005         Cs-1 34         (1 .8+/-3.4)E-9             <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137         (-1 .45.3)E-9             <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison H-3           (0.7+/-1.2)E-7           (2.7+/-2.8)E-74      Not Detected/No Comparison             <5E-8 Sr-90         (0.2+/-1 .1)E-9           <1 .25E-8 5     Not Detected/No Comearison
<4E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (-9+/-29)E-10  
 
<4E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (2.168+/-0.028)E-4 (2.07+/-?)E-4 Agreement (2.1 16+/-0.008)E-44 Agreement Sr-90 (1.4+/-1 .2)2-9 Not Analyzed Not Detected/No ComParison  
'John White - Indian Point Analytical Result Rev3.wpd                                                                                         Page 4 ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 4 of 7)
----.- - ---- Jlo White Indian Point Analvical Result Rev3.wpd Paqe 31 ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 3 of 7)Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to Result milliliter) milliliter)
Sample ID           Radionuclide     NRC Result           Indian Pt. Result           Comparison             State of New York (microCuries per       (microCuries per   (Licensee Result Compared to           Result milliliter)             milliliter)             NRC Result)             (microCuries per I_                   ._._             !                     .                               _           _milliliter)
NRC Result) (microCuries per l_ l milliliter)
Monitoring Well           Co-58         (1 .53.3)E-9               <4E-94       Not Detected/No Comparison MW-105               Co-60         (1 .5+/-3.3)E-9               <4E-94        Not Detected/No Comparison 12/8/2005             Cs-134         (0.4+/-3.5)E-9               <4E-94        Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137         (0.4+2.9)E-9               <4E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison H-3         (-0.1+/-1.2)E-7           (2.2+2.7)E-7 4   Not Detected/No Comparison       (1.0+/-0.9)E-7 Sr-90         (-0.2+/-1.2)E-9             <1 .93E-85      Not Detected/No Comparison Monitoring Well           Co-58         (1.7+2.7)E-9               <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison MW-107               Co-60         (-0.2+2.6)E-9               <4E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison 12/8/2005             Cs-134         (2.5+/-2.8)E-9               <5E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison 4
Monitoring Well Co-58 (-7+/-23)E-10  
Cs-1 37       (-1.1+/-2.4)E-9               <3E-9         Not Detected/No Comparison 4
<6E-8 4 Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with MW-il1 Co-60 (1 .8+/-2.2)E-9  
H-3         (1.3+/-1.2)E-7           (1.3+/-2.7)E-7     Not Detected/No Comparison           <5E-8 6
<4E-8 4 Not Detected/No Comparison New York 10/14/2005 Cs-134 (1 .9+/-2.2)E-9  
Sr-9o         (0.8+/-1.2)E-9             <1.33E-8       Not Detected/No Comparison Lefarge Gypsum           Co-58         (-2.8*3.2)E-9               <4E-94        Not Detected/No Comparison Plant Well #1           Co-60         (0.8+/-3.9)E-9               <4E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison 1216/2005             Cs-134         (0.3+/-3.6)E-9               <4E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137         (0.2+/-3.5)E-9               <4E-94        Not Detected/No Comparison H-3         (0.4+/-1.2)E-7           (0.8+/-2.7)E-7 4   Not Detected/No Comparison           <5E-8 Sr-90         (1.2+/-1.1)E-9             <1 .48E-8s     Not Detected/No Comparison
<4E-8 4 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (-2.1i+/-3.6)E-9  
 
<5E-8 4 Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (7.29+/-0.41 )E-6 (6.82+/-?)E-6 Agreement Sr-90 (1.1+/-1.3)E-9 Not Analyzed Not Detected/No Comparison Monitoring Well Co-58 (-1.5+/-3.7)E-9  
~JLobhn Wte-Indian Point Analytil Result Rev3w d.                                                                                   Page 5 ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 5 of 7)
<3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison MW-38 Co-60 (0.3+/-3.3)E-9  
Sample ID   Radionuclide       NRC Result           Indian Pt. Result           Comparison         State of New York (microCuries per       (microCuries per   (Licensee Result Compared to       Result milliliter)             milliliter)             NRC Result)         (microCuries per milliliter)
<3E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison 12/8/2005 Cs-134 (4.4+/-3.3)E-9  
Lefarge Gypsum   Co-58           (0.4+/-2.5)E-9               <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison Plant Well #3   Co-60           (0.3+/-3.1)E-9               <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison 12/6/2005     Cs-1 34         (3.8+/-2.8)E-9               <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137         (-0.8+/-4.4)E-9               <4E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison H-3           (0.2+/-1.2)E-7           (1.1+2.7)E-7 4   Not Detected/No Comparison       <5E-8 Sr-90         (0.1+/-1.0)E-9             <1.36E-8 5     Not Detected/No Comparison Trap Rock Quarry   Co-58           (0.4+/-1.7)E-9               <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison       <0.9E-9 11/30/2005     Co-60           (-0.1+/-2.1)E-9               <2E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison       <0.5E-9 Cs-134         (-0.4+/-1.8)E-9               <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison       <1 .2E-9 Cs-137         (0.6+/-1 .6)E-9               <2E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison       <1.1 E-9 H-3           (0.4+/-1.2)E-7           (-1.2+/-2.7)E-74    Not Detected/No Comparison       (9+/-6)E-8 Sr-90         (0.9+/-1 .0)E-9             <2.07E-8 5     Not Detected/No Comparison       <4E-10
<3E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (-0.7+/-3.0)E-9  
 
<3E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (7.4+/-1 .3)E-7 (9.8+/-2.9)E-7 4 Agreement (7.0+/-1 .2)E-7 Sr-90 (0.4+/-1.2)E-9  
John White - Indian Point Analvtical Result Rev3.wpd                                                                                   Page 6 I ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 6 of 7)
<1.25E-8 5  Not Detected/No Comparison Monitoring Well Co-58 (-0.2+/-3.1)E-9  
Sample ID       Radionuclide       NRC Result           Indian Pt. Result           Comparison         State of New York (microCuries per       (microCuries per   (Licensee Result Compared to       Result milliliter)             milliliter)             NRC Result)         (microCuries per milliliter Algonquin Outfall       Co-58           (1.1+2.3)E-9               <4E-9 44      Not Detected/No Comparison       <1.5E-9 11/30/2005           Co-60         (-0.5+2.2)E-9               <5E-9         Not Detected/No Comparison       <1.4E-9 Cs-134           (0.5+2.4)E-9               <4E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison       <1.7E-9 Cs-1 37         (-1.6+2.2)E-9               <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison       <1.5E-9 H-3           (0.3+/-1.2)E-7           (0.6+2.8)E-7 4     Not Detected/No Comparison       <6E-8 Sr-90           (0.3+/-1.0)E-9             <2.07E-8 5       Not Detected/No Comparison     (7+/-4)E-10 Fifth Street Well       Co-58           (0.9+2.2)E-9               <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison       <1 .8E-9 11/30/2005           Co-60           (0.8+2.6)E-9               <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison       <1.9E-9 Cs-134         (-0.1+/-2.1)E-9               <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison       <1 .9E-9 Cs-137         (-0.6+2.1)E-9               <3E-9 4       Not Detected/No Comparison       <1 .9E-9 H-3           (-0.7+/-1.2)E-7           (-0.7+2.7)E-7 4     Not Detected/No Comparison       <6E-8 Sr-90           (0.4+/-1t.0)E-9             <1.26E-8s       Not Detected/No Comparison     (8+/-7)E-10
<3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison MW-101 Co-60 (2.5t3.6)E-9  
 
<4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison 12/8/2005 Cs-1 34 (1 .8+/-3.4)E-9  
I   Wit -Indian Point AnltclResult Rev3.wpd oh                                                                                                                                                  hhaRt weI ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 7 of 7)
<3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (-1 .45.3)E-9  
Sample ID             Radionuclide           NRC Result               Indian Pt. Result         Comparison             State of New York (microCuries per             (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to           Result milliliter)                   milliliter)         NRC Result)             (microCuries per
<3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (0.7+/-1.2)E-7 (2.7+/-2.8)E-7 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
                                .___               .                       .. .milliliter)
<5E-8 Sr-90 (0.2+/-1 .1)E-9 <1 .25E-8 5 Not Detected/No Comearison  
Gypsum Plant Stream             Co-58               (0.0+/-1.9)E-9                     <3E-94      Not Detected/No Comparison           <2E-9 11/30/2005                 Co-60               (0.1+/-1.8)E-9                     <4E-94      Not Detected/No Comparison           <1 .7E-9 Cs-134               (0.1+2.1)E-9                     <3E-94      Not Detected/No Comparison           <1.9E-9 Cs-137               (-0.3+/-1.7)E-9                     <3E-94      Not Detected/No Comparison           <1.7E-9 H-3               (0.1+/-1.2)E-7                 (0.6+2.8)E-7 4  Not Detected/No Comparison           <6E-8 Sr-90               (0.5+/-1.0)E-9                   <1.52E-85    Not Detected/No Comparison         (8+/-4)E-10 1.Result from a sample taken on 09/08/2005. Therefore, not a split sample, but presented for information only.
'John White -Indian Point Analytical Result Rev3.wpd Page 4 ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 4 of 7)Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to Result milliliter) milliliter)
2.Result from a sample taken on 09/29/2005. Therefore, not a split sample, but presented for information only.
NRC Result) (microCuries per I_ ._ ._ ! ._ _milliliter)
3.Result from a sample taken on 10/10/2005. Therefore, not a split sample, but presented for information only.
Monitoring Well Co-58 (1 .53.3)E-9  
4.1ndian Point offsite environmental laboratory result.
<4E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison MW-105 Co-60 (1 .5+/-3.3)E-9  
5.1ndian Point offsite commercial contract laboratory result.
<4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison 12/8/2005 Cs-134 (0.4+/-3.5)E-9  
Note: reported uncertainties for NRC and New York State represent the 95% confidence interval based on total propogated uncertainties. Indian Point uncertainties represent the 95% confidence interval, based on counting uncertainty.}}
<4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (0.4+2.9)E-9  
<4E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (-0.1+/-1.2)E-7 (2.2+2.7)E-7 4  Not Detected/No Comparison (1.0+/-0.9)E-7 Sr-90 (-0.2+/-1.2)E-9  
<1 .93E-8 5 Not Detected/No Comparison Monitoring Well Co-58 (1 .7+2.7)E-9  
<3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison MW-107 Co-60 (-0.2+2.6)E-9  
<4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison 12/8/2005 Cs-134 (2.5+/-2.8)E-9  
<5E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-1 37 (-1.1+/-2.4)E-9  
<3E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (1.3+/-1.2)E-7 (1.3+/-2.7)E-7 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<5E-8 Sr-9o (0.8+/-1.2)E-9  
<1.33E-8 6  Not Detected/No Comparison Lefarge Gypsum Co-58 (-2.8*3.2)E-9  
<4E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison Plant Well #1 Co-60 (0.8+/-3.9)E-9  
<4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison 1216/2005 Cs-134 (0.3+/-3.6)E-9  
<4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (0.2+/-3.5)E-9  
<4E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (0.4+/-1.2)E-7 (0.8+/-2.7)E-7 4 Not Detected/No Comparison  
<5E-8 Sr-90 (1.2+/-1.1)E-9  
<1 .48E-8s Not Detected/No Comparison  
~JLobhn Wte-Indian Point Analytil Result Rev3w d.Page 5 ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 5 of 7)Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to Result milliliter) milliliter)
NRC Result) (microCuries per milliliter)
Lefarge Gypsum Co-58 (0.4+/-2.5)E-9  
<3E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison Plant Well #3 Co-60 (0.3+/-3.1)E-9  
<3E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison 12/6/2005 Cs-1 34 (3.8+/-2.8)E-9  
<3E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (-0.8+/-4.4)E-9  
<4E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (0.2+/-1.2)E-7 (1.1+2.7)E-7 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<5E-8 Sr-90 (0.1+/-1.0)E-9  
<1.36E-8 5  Not Detected/No Comparison Trap Rock Quarry Co-58 (0.4+/-1.7)E-9  
<3E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<0.9E-9 11/30/2005 Co-60 (-0.1+/-2.1)E-9  
<2E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<0.5E-9 Cs-134 (-0.4+/-1.8)E-9  
<3E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1 .2E-9 Cs-137 (0.6+/-1 .6)E-9 <2E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1.1 E-9 H-3 (0.4+/-1.2)E-7  
(-1.2+/-2.7)E-7 4 Not Detected/No Comparison (9+/-6)E-8 Sr-90 (0.9+/-1 .0)E-9 <2.07E-8 5 Not Detected/No Comparison  
<4E-10 John White -Indian Point Analvtical Result Rev3.wpd Page 6 I ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 6 of 7)Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to Result milliliter) milliliter)
NRC Result) (microCuries per milliliter Algonquin Outfall Co-58 (1.1+2.3)E-9  
<4E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1.5E-9 11/30/2005 Co-60 (-0.5+2.2)E-9  
<5E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1.4E-9 Cs-134 (0.5+2.4)E-9  
<4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1.7E-9 Cs-1 37 (-1.6+2.2)E-9  
<3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1.5E-9 H-3 (0.3+/-1.2)E-7 (0.6+2.8)E-7 4 Not Detected/No Comparison  
<6E-8 Sr-90 (0.3+/-1.0)E-9  
<2.07E-8 5 Not Detected/No Comparison (7+/-4)E-10 Fifth Street Well Co-58 (0.9+2.2)E-9  
<3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1 .8E-9 11/30/2005 Co-60 (0.8+2.6)E-9  
<3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1.9E-9 Cs-134 (-0.1+/-2.1)E-9  
<3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1 .9E-9 Cs-137 (-0.6+2.1)E-9  
<3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1 .9E-9 H-3 (-0.7+/-1.2)E-7  
(-0.7+2.7)E-7 4 Not Detected/No Comparison  
<6E-8 Sr-90 (0.4+/-1t.0)E-9  
<1.26E-8s Not Detected/No Comparison (8+/-7)E-10 I oh Wit -Indian Point AnltclResult Rev3.wpd h ha R t we I ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 7 of 7)Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to Result milliliter) milliliter)
NRC Result) (microCuries per.___ ... .milliliter)
Gypsum Plant Stream Co-58 (0.0+/-1.9)E-9  
<3E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<2E-9 11/30/2005 Co-60 (0.1+/-1.8)E-9  
<4E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1 .7E-9 Cs-134 (0.1+2.1)E-9  
<3E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1.9E-9 Cs-137 (-0.3+/-1.7)E-9  
<3E-9 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<1.7E-9 H-3 (0.1+/-1.2)E-7 (0.6+2.8)E-7 4  Not Detected/No Comparison  
<6E-8 Sr-90 (0.5+/-1.0)E-9  
<1.52E-8 5 Not Detected/No Comparison (8+/-4)E-10 1 .Result from a sample taken on 09/08/2005.
Therefore, not a split sample, but presented for information only.2.Result from a sample taken on 09/29/2005.
Therefore, not a split sample, but presented for information only.3.Result from a sample taken on 10/10/2005.
Therefore, not a split sample, but presented for information only.4.1ndian Point offsite environmental laboratory result.5.1ndian Point offsite commercial contract laboratory result.Note: reported uncertainties for NRC and New York State represent the 95% confidence interval based on total propogated uncertainties.
Indian Point uncertainties represent the 95% confidence interval, based on counting uncertainty.}}

Latest revision as of 05:58, 23 March 2020

E-mail from J. White of USNRC to Tbrice@Gw.Dec.State.Ny.Us; and Waxelso@Entergy.Com, Regarding Compilation of Sample Results
ML061320225
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/2006
From: Jason White
Division of Reactor Safety I
To: Axelson W, Rice T
Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Entergy Nuclear Operations, State of NY, Dept of Environmental Conservation
References
FOIA/PA-2006-0140
Download: ML061320225 (8)
v • d • e


Text

lfJohn White -- Compilation

,-H . ---

of samDle results Paae 1 d From: John White To: Tbrice@gw.dec.state.ny.us; Waxelso~entergy.com Date: 3/2/06 5:19PM

Subject:

Compilation of sample results The attached is our compilation of the sample data. Please review to assure accuracy of the data presented. We are planning to make the attach this table to the NRC inspection report.

CC: James Kottan; James Noggle Ail

I John White - Indian Point Analytical Result Rev3.wpd -~ PageI~

ATTACHMENT 1 Indian Point Analytical Results Comparison Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Ucensee Result Compared to Result l milliliter) milliliter) NRC Result) (microCuries per milliliter Unit 1 Sphere Foundation Co-58 (-5+/-24)E-10 <8E-8 Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with Drain Sump 10/19/2005 Co-60 (-8+/-23)E-10 <8E-8 Not Detected/No Comparison New York Cs-134 (-1.9+/-2.3)E-9 <1 E-7 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (9+/-22)E-10 <1 E-7 Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (5.7+/-2.6)E-7 (8.53+/-?)E-7 Agreement Sr-90 (-0.2+/-1.2)E-9 Not Analyzed Not Detected/No Comparison Unit 1 West Spent Fuel Co-58 (-5+/-18)E-7 <2E-6 -Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with Pool Co-60 (2.98+/-0.35)E-5 (3.76+/-0.32)E-5 Agreement New York 10/20/2005 Cs-134 (2+/-14)E-7 <2E-6 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (6.74+/-0.22)E-3 (8.13+/-0.04)E-3 Agreement H-3 (4.18+/-0.72)E-4 (4.16+/-?)E-4' No Comparison 2

(3.27+/-?)E-4 No Comparison Sr-90 (1.300+/-0.035)E-4 Not Analyzed No Comparison Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool Co-58 (3.46+/-0.16)E-4 (3.33+/-0.0.06)E-4 Agreement Sample not Split with 10/21/2005 Co-60 (7.95+/-0.28)E-4 (7.99+/-0.08)E-4 Agreement New York Cs-134 (8.57+/-0.31)E-4 (1.031+/-0.0.008)E-3 Agreement Cs-137 (1.319+/-0.046)E-3 (1.586+/-0.012)E-3 Agreement 3

H-3 (2.929+/-0.083)E-2 (2.52+/-?)E-2 No Comparison Sr-90 (5.87+/-0.24)E-6 Not Analyzed No Comparison

John White - Indian Point Analytical Result Rev3.wqd ____ Page 2j ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 2 of 7)

Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to Result milliliter) milliliter) NRC Result) (microCuries per milliliter)

Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool Co-58 (2.4+/-3.4)E-9 <5E-8 Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with Wall Leak Co-60 (4.56+/-0.49)E-8 <8E-8 No Comparison New York 10/24/2005 Cs-134 (2.64+/-0.1 2)E-7 (3.6+/-0.8)E-7 Disagreement Cs-137 (4.88+/-0.15)E-6 (4.73+/-0.24)E-6 Agreement H-3 (2.208+/-0.047)E-2 (2.1 9+/-?)E-2 Agreement Sr-90 (3.70+/-0.12)E-7 Not Analyzed No Comparison Unit 1 North Curtain Drain Co-58 (-1.4+/-1 .8)E-9 Sample not Split with Composite Co-60 (0.0+/-2.1)E-9 New York 10/21/2005 Cs-134 (-6+/-19)E-10 Cs-137 (4.48+/-0.42)E-8 H-3 (1.425+/-0.053)E-5 Sr-90 (9.97+/-0.42)E-8 Not Analyzed No Comparison Monitoring Well Co-58 (2.7+/-4.3)E-9 <5E-944 Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with MW-11 Co-60 (3.5+/-3.1)E-9 <2E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison New York 9/29/2005 Cs-134 (-5+/-39)E-10 <4E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (-9+/-29)E-10 <4E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (2.168+/-0.028)E-4 (2.07+/-?)E-4 Agreement (2.1 16+/-0.008)E-44 Agreement Sr-90 (1.4+/-1 .2)2-9 Not Analyzed Not Detected/No ComParison

-- - -.- - 1-- - --- -j Jlo White Indian Point Analvical Result Rev3.wpd Paqe 31 ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 3 of 7)

Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to Result milliliter) milliliter) NRC Result) (microCuries per l_ l milliliter)

Monitoring Well Co-58 (-7+/-23)E-10 <6E-8 4 Not Detected/No Comparison Sample not Split with MW-il1 Co-60 (1.8+/-2.2)E-9 <4E-8 4 Not Detected/No Comparison New York 10/14/2005 Cs-134 (1.9+/-2.2)E-9 <4E-8 4 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (-2.1i+/-3.6)E-9 <5E-8 4 Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (7.29+/-0.41 )E-6 (6.82+/-?)E-6 Agreement Sr-90 (1.1+/-1.3)E-9 Not Analyzed Not Detected/No Comparison Monitoring Well Co-58 (-1.5+/-3.7)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison MW-38 Co-60 (0.3+/-3.3)E-9 <3E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison 12/8/2005 Cs-134 (4.4+/-3.3)E-9 <3E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (-0.7+/-3.0)E-9 <3E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (7.4+/-1 .3)E-7 (9.8+/-2.9)E-7 4 Agreement (7.0+/-1 .2)E-7 Sr-90 (0.4+/-1.2)E-9 <1.25E-85 Not Detected/No Comparison Monitoring Well Co-58 (-0.2+/-3.1)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison MW-101 Co-60 (2.5t3.6)E-9 <4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison 12/8/2005 Cs-1 34 (1 .8+/-3.4)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (-1 .45.3)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (0.7+/-1.2)E-7 (2.7+/-2.8)E-74 Not Detected/No Comparison <5E-8 Sr-90 (0.2+/-1 .1)E-9 <1 .25E-8 5 Not Detected/No Comearison

'John White - Indian Point Analytical Result Rev3.wpd Page 4 ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 4 of 7)

Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to Result milliliter) milliliter) NRC Result) (microCuries per I_ ._._  ! . _ _milliliter)

Monitoring Well Co-58 (1 .53.3)E-9 <4E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison MW-105 Co-60 (1 .5+/-3.3)E-9 <4E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison 12/8/2005 Cs-134 (0.4+/-3.5)E-9 <4E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (0.4+2.9)E-9 <4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (-0.1+/-1.2)E-7 (2.2+2.7)E-7 4 Not Detected/No Comparison (1.0+/-0.9)E-7 Sr-90 (-0.2+/-1.2)E-9 <1 .93E-85 Not Detected/No Comparison Monitoring Well Co-58 (1.7+2.7)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison MW-107 Co-60 (-0.2+2.6)E-9 <4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison 12/8/2005 Cs-134 (2.5+/-2.8)E-9 <5E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison 4

Cs-1 37 (-1.1+/-2.4)E-9 <3E-9 Not Detected/No Comparison 4

H-3 (1.3+/-1.2)E-7 (1.3+/-2.7)E-7 Not Detected/No Comparison <5E-8 6

Sr-9o (0.8+/-1.2)E-9 <1.33E-8 Not Detected/No Comparison Lefarge Gypsum Co-58 (-2.8*3.2)E-9 <4E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison Plant Well #1 Co-60 (0.8+/-3.9)E-9 <4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison 1216/2005 Cs-134 (0.3+/-3.6)E-9 <4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (0.2+/-3.5)E-9 <4E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (0.4+/-1.2)E-7 (0.8+/-2.7)E-7 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <5E-8 Sr-90 (1.2+/-1.1)E-9 <1 .48E-8s Not Detected/No Comparison

~JLobhn Wte-Indian Point Analytil Result Rev3w d. Page 5 ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 5 of 7)

Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to Result milliliter) milliliter) NRC Result) (microCuries per milliliter)

Lefarge Gypsum Co-58 (0.4+/-2.5)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison Plant Well #3 Co-60 (0.3+/-3.1)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison 12/6/2005 Cs-1 34 (3.8+/-2.8)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison Cs-137 (-0.8+/-4.4)E-9 <4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison H-3 (0.2+/-1.2)E-7 (1.1+2.7)E-7 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <5E-8 Sr-90 (0.1+/-1.0)E-9 <1.36E-8 5 Not Detected/No Comparison Trap Rock Quarry Co-58 (0.4+/-1.7)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <0.9E-9 11/30/2005 Co-60 (-0.1+/-2.1)E-9 <2E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <0.5E-9 Cs-134 (-0.4+/-1.8)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <1 .2E-9 Cs-137 (0.6+/-1 .6)E-9 <2E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <1.1 E-9 H-3 (0.4+/-1.2)E-7 (-1.2+/-2.7)E-74 Not Detected/No Comparison (9+/-6)E-8 Sr-90 (0.9+/-1 .0)E-9 <2.07E-8 5 Not Detected/No Comparison <4E-10

John White - Indian Point Analvtical Result Rev3.wpd Page 6 I ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 6 of 7)

Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to Result milliliter) milliliter) NRC Result) (microCuries per milliliter Algonquin Outfall Co-58 (1.1+2.3)E-9 <4E-9 44 Not Detected/No Comparison <1.5E-9 11/30/2005 Co-60 (-0.5+2.2)E-9 <5E-9 Not Detected/No Comparison <1.4E-9 Cs-134 (0.5+2.4)E-9 <4E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <1.7E-9 Cs-1 37 (-1.6+2.2)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <1.5E-9 H-3 (0.3+/-1.2)E-7 (0.6+2.8)E-7 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <6E-8 Sr-90 (0.3+/-1.0)E-9 <2.07E-8 5 Not Detected/No Comparison (7+/-4)E-10 Fifth Street Well Co-58 (0.9+2.2)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <1 .8E-9 11/30/2005 Co-60 (0.8+2.6)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <1.9E-9 Cs-134 (-0.1+/-2.1)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <1 .9E-9 Cs-137 (-0.6+2.1)E-9 <3E-9 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <1 .9E-9 H-3 (-0.7+/-1.2)E-7 (-0.7+2.7)E-7 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <6E-8 Sr-90 (0.4+/-1t.0)E-9 <1.26E-8s Not Detected/No Comparison (8+/-7)E-10

I Wit -Indian Point AnltclResult Rev3.wpd oh hhaRt weI ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 7 of 7)

Sample ID Radionuclide NRC Result Indian Pt. Result Comparison State of New York (microCuries per (microCuries per (Licensee Result Compared to Result milliliter) milliliter) NRC Result) (microCuries per

.___ . .. .milliliter)

Gypsum Plant Stream Co-58 (0.0+/-1.9)E-9 <3E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison <2E-9 11/30/2005 Co-60 (0.1+/-1.8)E-9 <4E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison <1 .7E-9 Cs-134 (0.1+2.1)E-9 <3E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison <1.9E-9 Cs-137 (-0.3+/-1.7)E-9 <3E-94 Not Detected/No Comparison <1.7E-9 H-3 (0.1+/-1.2)E-7 (0.6+2.8)E-7 4 Not Detected/No Comparison <6E-8 Sr-90 (0.5+/-1.0)E-9 <1.52E-85 Not Detected/No Comparison (8+/-4)E-10 1.Result from a sample taken on 09/08/2005. Therefore, not a split sample, but presented for information only.

2.Result from a sample taken on 09/29/2005. Therefore, not a split sample, but presented for information only.

3.Result from a sample taken on 10/10/2005. Therefore, not a split sample, but presented for information only.

4.1ndian Point offsite environmental laboratory result.

5.1ndian Point offsite commercial contract laboratory result.

Note: reported uncertainties for NRC and New York State represent the 95% confidence interval based on total propogated uncertainties. Indian Point uncertainties represent the 95% confidence interval, based on counting uncertainty.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML061320225&oldid=2664915"