ML061360339: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML061360339
| number = ML061360339
| issue date = 04/11/2006
| issue date = 04/11/2006
| title = Haddam Neck Final Status Survey Final Report - Phase Iii, Book 3 of 8, Appendix A2, Survey Unit Release Record 9527-0001, East Mountain Side
| title = Final Status Survey Final Report - Phase III, Book 3 of 8, Appendix A2, Survey Unit Release Record 9527-0001, East Mountain Side
| author name = McCarthy J, Randall D
| author name = Mccarthy J, Randall D
| author affiliation = Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co
| author affiliation = Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 30: Line 30:
.17 13. CONCLUSION  
.17 13. CONCLUSION  
.17 14. ATTACHMENTS  
.17 14. ATTACHMENTS  
.17 14.1 Attachment 1 -Figures (6 pages including cover)14.2 Attachment 2 -Sample and Statistical Data (108 pages including covers)Revision 0 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION Survey Unit 9527-0001 (East Mountain Side) is designated as Final Status Survey (FSS) Class 2 and consists of approximately 8,600 m 2 (2.13 acres) of wooded and wetland area located approximately  
.17 14.1 Attachment 1 -Figures (6 pages including cover)14.2 Attachment 2 -Sample and Statistical Data (108 pages including covers)Revision 0 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION Survey Unit 9527-0001 (East Mountain Side) is designated as Final Status Survey (FSS) Class 2 and consists of approximately 8,600 m 2 (2.13 acres) of wooded and wetland area located approximately 0.1 miles from the reference coordinate system benchmark used at Haddam Neck Plant (HNP) (see Attachment 1, Figure 1). The survey unit is bounded by a fence on the northern side, an unpaved road along the western side and a stone wall along the southern side. A Class 2 survey unit, 9527-0002, bounds this survey unit on the south. The survey unit comprises wooded terrain with some steep rock ledge and rock outcroppings within the interior.The reference coordinates associated with this survey unit are E013 through E022 by S056 through S064 (refer to License Termination Plan Section 5.4.4).The reference coordinates provide the maximum dimensions of a rectangle containing this survey unit. Some areas contained in this rectangle may not be part of this survey unit. The boundary of the survey unit was defined using a Global Positioning System (GPS).A review of the historical files indicates two (2) events potentially impacting this survey unit. Contamination was found in 1980 in uncontrolled areas including the East Mountain Side (refer to Plant Information Report PIR 80-37).Recently, tank farm tent material with low-level fixed contamination was found on the East Mountain Side (refer to Condition Report CR 05-0244).
 
===0.1 miles===
from the reference coordinate system benchmark used at Haddam Neck Plant (HNP) (see Attachment 1, Figure 1). The survey unit is bounded by a fence on the northern side, an unpaved road along the western side and a stone wall along the southern side. A Class 2 survey unit, 9527-0002, bounds this survey unit on the south. The survey unit comprises wooded terrain with some steep rock ledge and rock outcroppings within the interior.The reference coordinates associated with this survey unit are E013 through E022 by S056 through S064 (refer to License Termination Plan Section 5.4.4).The reference coordinates provide the maximum dimensions of a rectangle containing this survey unit. Some areas contained in this rectangle may not be part of this survey unit. The boundary of the survey unit was defined using a Global Positioning System (GPS).A review of the historical files indicates two (2) events potentially impacting this survey unit. Contamination was found in 1980 in uncontrolled areas including the East Mountain Side (refer to Plant Information Report PIR 80-37).Recently, tank farm tent material with low-level fixed contamination was found on the East Mountain Side (refer to Condition Report CR 05-0244).
This material was found in another survey unit of 9527. Walkdowns of the remaining East Mountain Side did not identify more tent material.
This material was found in another survey unit of 9527. Walkdowns of the remaining East Mountain Side did not identify more tent material.
The single piece of tent material was found in Survey Unit 9527-0005 along the fence and about one hundred eighty (180) feet from the nearest boundary of 9527-0001.
The single piece of tent material was found in Survey Unit 9527-0005 along the fence and about one hundred eighty (180) feet from the nearest boundary of 9527-0001.
Line 67: Line 64:
Each sample would be sent off-site for a full suite analysis of the HTD radionuclides specified in the LTP, Table 2-12,"Radionuclides Potentially Present at Haddam Neck Plant." The implementation of survey specific quality control measures as referenced by Procedure RPM 5.1-24, "Split Sample Assessmentfor Final Status Survey, " included the collection of two (2) soil samples for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory.
Each sample would be sent off-site for a full suite analysis of the HTD radionuclides specified in the LTP, Table 2-12,"Radionuclides Potentially Present at Haddam Neck Plant." The implementation of survey specific quality control measures as referenced by Procedure RPM 5.1-24, "Split Sample Assessmentfor Final Status Survey, " included the collection of two (2) soil samples for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory.
These locations were selected randomly using the Microsoft Excel "RANDBETWEEN" function.
These locations were selected randomly using the Microsoft Excel "RANDBETWEEN" function.
The number of quality control soil samples was determined to be 13% of fifteen (15) samples, rounded up to the next whole number.The LTP specifies that scanning will be performed in a combination of systematic and judgmental measurements for a Class 2 land area and cover 10%to 100% of the area. The fraction of scanning coverage was determined during the DQO process with the total amount and location(s) based on the likelihood of finding elevated activity during FSS. Approximately 25% of the survey unit was to be scanned based on the characterization survey and sampling results.For this Class 2 survey unit, the "Investigation Level" for area scanning and soil sample measurement results are those levels specified in LTP, Table 5-8,"Investigation Levels." Table 4 provides a synopsis of the survey design.Table 4-Synopsis of the Survey Deign Feature Design.Criteria  
The number of quality control soil samples was determined to be 13% of fifteen (15) samples, rounded up to the next whole number.The LTP specifies that scanning will be performed in a combination of systematic and judgmental measurements for a Class 2 land area and cover 10%to 100% of the area. The fraction of scanning coverage was determined during the DQO process with the total amount and location(s) based on the likelihood of finding elevated activity during FSS. Approximately 25% of the survey unit was to be scanned based on the characterization survey and sampling results.For this Class 2 survey unit, the "Investigation Level" for area scanning and soil sample measurement results are those levels specified in LTP, Table 5-8,"Investigation Levels." Table 4 provides a synopsis of the survey design.Table 4-Synopsis of the Survey Deign Feature Design.Criteria
:Basis Survey Unit Land Area 8,600 m 2  Based on AutoCAD-Lt and Visual Sample Plan calculations Type I and Type 2 errors were 0.05, sigma was 0.10, the Number of Measurements 15 LBGR was adjusted to 0.79 to maintain Relative Shift in the range of I and 3, Relative Shift was 2 Grid Spacing 20.74 Based on triangular grid Interval Spacing 17.96 Based on triangular grid Operational DCGL 2.53 pCi/g Cs-137 Administratively set to achieve 1.22 pCi/g Co-60 8 mrem in a year TEDE Scan Survey Area The LTP requires >10% area Ca veyrge 25% of the area coverage for Class 2 Survey Coverage Units...Detectable over Based on achieving the background Operational DCGL Revision 0 10 Revision 0 10 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD 5. SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION Final status survey field activities were conducted under Work Plan and Inspection Record (WP&IR) 2005-0054.
:Basis Survey Unit Land Area 8,600 m 2  Based on AutoCAD-Lt and Visual Sample Plan calculations Type I and Type 2 errors were 0.05, sigma was 0.10, the Number of Measurements 15 LBGR was adjusted to 0.79 to maintain Relative Shift in the range of I and 3, Relative Shift was 2 Grid Spacing 20.74 Based on triangular grid Interval Spacing 17.96 Based on triangular grid Operational DCGL 2.53 pCi/g Cs-137 Administratively set to achieve 1.22 pCi/g Co-60 8 mrem in a year TEDE Scan Survey Area The LTP requires >10% area Ca veyrge 25% of the area coverage for Class 2 Survey Coverage Units...Detectable over Based on achieving the background Operational DCGL Revision 0 10 Revision 0 10 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD 5. SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION Final status survey field activities were conducted under Work Plan and Inspection Record (WP&IR) 2005-0054.
The WP&IR package included a detailed FSSP, job safety analysis, job planning checklist and related procedures for reference.
The WP&IR package included a detailed FSSP, job safety analysis, job planning checklist and related procedures for reference.
Line 78: Line 75:
The implementation of survey specific quality control measures included the collection of two (2) samples (9527-0001 -OIOF and 9527-0001-013F) for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory.
The implementation of survey specific quality control measures included the collection of two (2) samples (9527-0001 -OIOF and 9527-0001-013F) for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory.
: 6. SURVEY RESULTS The eighteen (18) soil sample measurement locations identified in the FSS plan and Addendum were scanned about a one (1) meter radius for elevated radiation levels. Table 5 provides an overview of the scan area survey. Scan area results are provided in Attachment 2.Revision 0 I1I EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Table 5- Scan Area Results for Sample Measurement Locations Measurement Reading Action Level Above Action Level 'Location (kcpm) (kpm)1 8.87 8.91 No 2 7.67 8.63 No 3 8.94 10.5 No 4 7.93 9.43 No 5 10.4 12.9 No 6 9.12 12.2 No 7 8.42 9.57 No 8 8.20 9.92 No 9 10.7 12.4 No 10 10.1 11.7 No 11 9.97 10.9 No 12 11.1 12.2 No 13 12.7 13.9 No 14 11.3 13.5 No 15 13.6 14.7 No 16 9.27 10.0 No 17 9.10 9.27 No 18 9.90 11.2 No (I) FSS sample plans require movement of the sample measurement location to the area within the 1 meter radius yielding the response above the action level Twenty-two areas were scanned for elevated radiation levels. Several elevated areas were identified.
: 6. SURVEY RESULTS The eighteen (18) soil sample measurement locations identified in the FSS plan and Addendum were scanned about a one (1) meter radius for elevated radiation levels. Table 5 provides an overview of the scan area survey. Scan area results are provided in Attachment 2.Revision 0 I1I EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Table 5- Scan Area Results for Sample Measurement Locations Measurement Reading Action Level Above Action Level 'Location (kcpm) (kpm)1 8.87 8.91 No 2 7.67 8.63 No 3 8.94 10.5 No 4 7.93 9.43 No 5 10.4 12.9 No 6 9.12 12.2 No 7 8.42 9.57 No 8 8.20 9.92 No 9 10.7 12.4 No 10 10.1 11.7 No 11 9.97 10.9 No 12 11.1 12.2 No 13 12.7 13.9 No 14 11.3 13.5 No 15 13.6 14.7 No 16 9.27 10.0 No 17 9.10 9.27 No 18 9.90 11.2 No (I) FSS sample plans require movement of the sample measurement location to the area within the 1 meter radius yielding the response above the action level Twenty-two areas were scanned for elevated radiation levels. Several elevated areas were identified.
Table 6 provides an overview of the scan area survey.Scan area results are provided in Attachment 2.Table 6- Scan Area Results Sa iLogged Action Elevated Reading Investigation Scan ogged Level Area Reading (kcpm) Identification  
Table 6 provides an overview of the scan area survey.Scan area results are provided in Attachment 2.Table 6- Scan Area Results Sa iLogged Action Elevated Reading Investigation Scan ogged Level Area Reading (kcpm) Identification
() Sample (kcpm) 102_on-_oleatdon 1 8.42 10.2 None -no elevated None areas identified 2 8.46 9.61 None -no elevated None areas identified 3 10.9 10.2 9527-01-SC-01-25-0 None"(4 11.3 12.6 None -no elevated None areas identified 5 12.1 12.0 9527-01-SC-01-42-0 None (I Revision 0 12 Revision 0 12 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Table 6- Scan Area Results Highest Ato Scan Logged Acon Elevated Reading Investigation Area Reading (kpm) Identificaon Sample ( k c m )_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _6 10.5 11.5 None- no elevated None areas identified 7 9.84 10.5 None -no elevated None areas identified 8 9.75 10.2 None -no elevated None 8_ _ 9.75_ 10.2areas identified 9 10.1 11.3 None -no elevated None areas identified 10 9.81 10.7 None -no elevated None areas identified 11 9.52 10.9 None -no elevated None areas identified 12 10.7 12.5 None- no elevated None areas identified 13 11.1 12.6 None -no elevated None areas identified 14 10.5 10.9 None -no elevated None areas identified 15 10.7 11.3 None -no elevated None areas identified 16 8.44 9.30 None -no elevated None areas identified 17 7.50 8.23 None- no elevated None areas identified 18 9.56 9.87 None -no elevated None areas identified 19 8.48 8.90 None -no elevated None areas identified 20 9.31 10.2 None -no elevated None areas identified 21 11.3 11.7 None -no elevated None areas identified
() Sample (kcpm) 102_on-_oleatdon 1 8.42 10.2 None -no elevated None areas identified 2 8.46 9.61 None -no elevated None areas identified 3 10.9 10.2 9527-01-SC-01-25-0 None"(4 11.3 12.6 None -no elevated None areas identified 5 12.1 12.0 9527-01-SC-01-42-0 None (I Revision 0 12 Revision 0 12 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Table 6- Scan Area Results Highest Ato Scan Logged Acon Elevated Reading Investigation Area Reading (kpm) Identificaon Sample ( k c m )_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _6 10.5 11.5 None- no elevated None areas identified 7 9.84 10.5 None -no elevated None areas identified 8 9.75 10.2 None -no elevated None 8_ _ 9.75_ 10.2areas identified 9 10.1 11.3 None -no elevated None areas identified 10 9.81 10.7 None -no elevated None areas identified 11 9.52 10.9 None -no elevated None areas identified 12 10.7 12.5 None- no elevated None areas identified 13 11.1 12.6 None -no elevated None areas identified 14 10.5 10.9 None -no elevated None areas identified 15 10.7 11.3 None -no elevated None areas identified 16 8.44 9.30 None -no elevated None areas identified 17 7.50 8.23 None- no elevated None areas identified 18 9.56 9.87 None -no elevated None areas identified 19 8.48 8.90 None -no elevated None areas identified 20 9.31 10.2 None -no elevated None areas identified 21 11.3 11.7 None -no elevated None areas identified
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _22 11.7 13.0 None -no elevated None____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ areas identified (1) SC is nomenclature associated with the barcodes used in the field where SC refers to Scan (2) Refer to Section 8 for additional details The off-site laboratory employed for the radiological analyses of samples was General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) -Charleston, South Carolina.
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _22 11.7 13.0 None -no elevated None____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ areas identified (1) SC is nomenclature associated with the barcodes used in the field where SC refers to Scan (2) Refer to Section 8 for additional details The off-site laboratory employed for the radiological analyses of samples was General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) -Charleston, South Carolina.
Line 103: Line 100:
Revision 0 16 Revision 0 16 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD The range of the data, about 3.7 standard deviations, was not unusually large.The difference between the mean and median was 30% of the standard deviation which indicates positive skewness in the data. The data was represented graphically through posting plots, a frequency plot, and a quantile plot. The frequency plot shows significant positive skewness as confirmed by the calculated skew of 1.0 and is probably due to the differences in terrain and the collection of runoff.All data, assessments, and graphical representations are provided in Attachment 2.12. ANOMALIES No anomalies were noted.13. CONCLUSION Survey Unit 9527-0001 has met the final DQOs of the FSS. The ALARA criteria for soils as specified in Chapter 4 of the LTP were achieved.
Revision 0 16 Revision 0 16 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD The range of the data, about 3.7 standard deviations, was not unusually large.The difference between the mean and median was 30% of the standard deviation which indicates positive skewness in the data. The data was represented graphically through posting plots, a frequency plot, and a quantile plot. The frequency plot shows significant positive skewness as confirmed by the calculated skew of 1.0 and is probably due to the differences in terrain and the collection of runoff.All data, assessments, and graphical representations are provided in Attachment 2.12. ANOMALIES No anomalies were noted.13. CONCLUSION Survey Unit 9527-0001 has met the final DQOs of the FSS. The ALARA criteria for soils as specified in Chapter 4 of the LTP were achieved.
Elevated Measurement Comparison and remediation was not required.The sample data passed the Sign Test. The null hypothesis was rejected.Graphical representation of data indicates significant positive skewness as that is probably due to the differences in terrain and the collection of runoff. The Retrospective Power Curve generated using COMPASS shows adequate power was achieved.
Elevated Measurement Comparison and remediation was not required.The sample data passed the Sign Test. The null hypothesis was rejected.Graphical representation of data indicates significant positive skewness as that is probably due to the differences in terrain and the collection of runoff. The Retrospective Power Curve generated using COMPASS shows adequate power was achieved.
The survey unit was properly designated as Class 2.As discussed in Section 1, the survey data results for this release record address the dose contribution due to soil as provided in LTP Equation 5-1. This survey unit is considered impacted by existing groundwater radioactive contamination as the survey unit is within the capture zone perimeter for an affected monitoring well. The dose contribution from the existing groundwater contamination will be addressed later and will be included to show compliance with site unrestricted release criteria as required by the LTP. This survey unit is not considered impacted by future groundwater radioactive contamination, as there are no underground structures, systems or components containing residual radioactive material within the groundwater saturated zone in the area. The dose contribution from future groundwater, the third component of Equation 5-1, is therefore zero.14. ATTACHMENTS 14.1 Attachment I -Figures 14.2 Attachment 2 -Sample and Statistical Data Revision 0 1 7 Revision 0 17 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 1 Figures (5 pages)  
The survey unit was properly designated as Class 2.As discussed in Section 1, the survey data results for this release record address the dose contribution due to soil as provided in LTP Equation 5-1. This survey unit is considered impacted by existing groundwater radioactive contamination as the survey unit is within the capture zone perimeter for an affected monitoring well. The dose contribution from the existing groundwater contamination will be addressed later and will be included to show compliance with site unrestricted release criteria as required by the LTP. This survey unit is not considered impacted by future groundwater radioactive contamination, as there are no underground structures, systems or components containing residual radioactive material within the groundwater saturated zone in the area. The dose contribution from future groundwater, the third component of Equation 5-1, is therefore zero.14. ATTACHMENTS 14.1 Attachment I -Figures 14.2 Attachment 2 -Sample and Statistical Data Revision 0 1 7 Revision 0 17 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 1 Figures (5 pages)
(-)Reference Coordinate System Benchmark-I TR GA 38 / r-#;- -RR636.A 1 I Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Date By Figure 1 Site Map With Reference To Survey Unit 9527-0001 March 2006 J MC C-)  
(-)Reference Coordinate System Benchmark-I TR GA 38 / r-#;- -RR636.A 1 I Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Date By Figure 1 Site Map With Reference To Survey Unit 9527-0001 March 2006 J MC C-)  
) stear'Legend Stone wall 0 35 70 0.56 I'I-, o.31 O.*5 0.40Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 9527-0001 Final Status Survey Cs-137 Posting Plot  
) stear'Legend Stone wall 0 35 70 0.56 I'I-, o.31 O.*5 0.40Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 9527-0001 Final Status Survey Cs-137 Posting Plot  
Line 140: Line 137:
Priority:II30D.O 15D.07D. i. $Other: jP~, VA' ~ksk______
Priority:II30D.O 15D.07D. i. $Other: jP~, VA' ~ksk______
_____________
_____________
Sample Designation Date Time L IL. Comment, Preservation Lab Sample ID 9527-0001-OOlF 9/20/05 1010 TS G BP X I" 9527-0001-002F 9/19/05 0820 TS G BP X ----9527-0001-003F 9/19/05 0825 TS G BP X _9527-0001-004F 9/19/05 1415 TS G BP X ___9527-0001-OOSF 9/19/05 1410 TS G BP X = =_._._=9527-0001-006F 9/19/05 0855 TS G BP X 9527-0001-007F 9/19/05 0907 TS G BP X _9527-0001-008F 9/20/05 1004 TS G BP X -9527-0001-009F 9/19/05 1405 TS G BP X --9527-0001-OIOF 9/19/05 1503 TS G BP X _9527-0001-OIOFS 9/19/05 1503 TS G BP X ----NOTES: PO #: 002332 MSR #: 05-2329 U LTP QA C Radwaste QA E Non QA Samples Shipped Via: Internal Container 0 Fed Ex Temp.: ' Deg. C O UPS E Hand Custody Sealed?Y N I) R Date/Time  
Sample Designation Date Time L IL. Comment, Preservation Lab Sample ID 9527-0001-OOlF 9/20/05 1010 TS G BP X I" 9527-0001-002F 9/19/05 0820 TS G BP X ----9527-0001-003F 9/19/05 0825 TS G BP X _9527-0001-004F 9/19/05 1415 TS G BP X ___9527-0001-OOSF 9/19/05 1410 TS G BP X = =_._._=9527-0001-006F 9/19/05 0855 TS G BP X 9527-0001-007F 9/19/05 0907 TS G BP X _9527-0001-008F 9/20/05 1004 TS G BP X -9527-0001-009F 9/19/05 1405 TS G BP X --9527-0001-OIOF 9/19/05 1503 TS G BP X _9527-0001-OIOFS 9/19/05 1503 TS G BP X ----NOTES: PO #: 002332 MSR #: 05-2329 U LTP QA C Radwaste QA E Non QA Samples Shipped Via: Internal Container 0 Fed Ex Temp.: ' Deg. C O UPS E Hand Custody Sealed?Y N I) R Date/Time
: 2) Rcceiv& Bwj Date/Time Custody Seal Intact?2 se 'h7/sZ /3e = Ae L- o o Other ,yelinquished By Date/Time  
: 2) Rcceiv& Bwj Date/Time Custody Seal Intact?2 se 'h7/sZ /3e = Ae L- o o Other ,yelinquished By Date/Time
: 4) Received By Date/Time 7Bil 7o3 L 70 7Z7 Y N Bill of Lading # .5) Relinquished By Date/Time  
: 4) Received By Date/Time 7Bil 7o3 L 70 7Z7 Y N Bill of Lading # .5) Relinquished By Date/Time
: 6) Received By Date/twime Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGQR-R5104-003-Attachment B-CY-001 Major Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Chain of Custody Form No. 2005-00402 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested Lab Use Only Contact Name & Phone: Comments: Pete Hollenbeck 860-267-3923 Media Sample Container__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Code Type Size-Analytical Lab (Name, City, State): Code &Type General Engineering Laboratories Code 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 ATT: Cheryl Jones ( 843-556-8171)
: 6) Received By Date/twime Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGQR-R5104-003-Attachment B-CY-001 Major Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Chain of Custody Form No. 2005-00402 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested Lab Use Only Contact Name & Phone: Comments: Pete Hollenbeck 860-267-3923 Media Sample Container__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Code Type Size-Analytical Lab (Name, City, State): Code &Type General Engineering Laboratories Code 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 ATT: Cheryl Jones ( 843-556-8171)
Priority:
Priority:
30 D. E 15 D. El 7 D.Other: ___Sample Designation Date Time Comment, Preservation Lab Sample ID 9527-0001-01 IF 9/19/05 1050 TS G BP X 9527-0001-012F 9/19/05 1042 TS G BP X -9527-0001-013F 9/19/05 1508 TS G BP X ---9527-0001-013FS 9/19/05 1508 TS G BP X 9527-0001-014F 9/19/05 1455 TS G BP X 9527-0001-015F 9/19/05 1451 TS G BP X ---9527-0001-016F 9/19/05 1400 TS G BP X -9527-0001-017F 9/19/05 1356 TS G BP X --9527-0001-018F 9/19/05 1352 TS G BP X NOTES: PO # 002332 MSR #:05-2329 U LTP QA E Radwaste QA E Non QA Samples Shipped Via: Internal Container 0 Fed Ex Temp.: o~3Deg. C Ol UPS.Hand Custody Sealed?Y '' N 1)R finqoe y Date/Time  
30 D. E 15 D. El 7 D.Other: ___Sample Designation Date Time Comment, Preservation Lab Sample ID 9527-0001-01 IF 9/19/05 1050 TS G BP X 9527-0001-012F 9/19/05 1042 TS G BP X -9527-0001-013F 9/19/05 1508 TS G BP X ---9527-0001-013FS 9/19/05 1508 TS G BP X 9527-0001-014F 9/19/05 1455 TS G BP X 9527-0001-015F 9/19/05 1451 TS G BP X ---9527-0001-016F 9/19/05 1400 TS G BP X -9527-0001-017F 9/19/05 1356 TS G BP X --9527-0001-018F 9/19/05 1352 TS G BP X NOTES: PO # 002332 MSR #:05-2329 U LTP QA E Radwaste QA E Non QA Samples Shipped Via: Internal Container 0 Fed Ex Temp.: o~3Deg. C Ol UPS.Hand Custody Sealed?Y '' N 1)R finqoe y Date/Time
: 2) Received By // j Date/Time Custody Seal Intact?VP 4/ /A4,..- 1 ! _ a Other 3kelinquished By Date/Time  
: 2) Received By // j Date/Time Custody Seal Intact?VP 4/ /A4,..- 1 ! _ a Other 3kelinquished By Date/Time
: 4) Received By Date/Time 79/7B3l 7fL ai7 gYI N.RBill of Lading #5) Relinquished By Date/Time  
: 4) Received By Date/Time 79/7B3l 7fL ai7 gYI N.RBill of Lading #5) Relinquished By Date/Time
: 6) Received By Date/Time Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services.cY-ISC-sOw-o0l Figure 1. Sample Check-in List Date/Time Received:
: 6) Received By Date/Time Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services.cY-ISC-sOw-o0l Figure 1. Sample Check-in List Date/Time Received:
1 V8 O~fX .SDG#: SRtaS- oA9 Work Order Number: Jg ~696 Shipping Cdhtainer ID: 1 17 3' 70 1V 7 Chain of Custody# A C-- V' 0C/Pj # ownVOJ.I. Custody Seals oi shipping container intact? Yes [1 No [1 2. Custody Seals dated and signed? Yes[ j No[3. Chain-of-Custody record present? Yes 4. Cooler temperature  
1 V8 O~fX .SDG#: SRtaS- oA9 Work Order Number: Jg ~696 Shipping Cdhtainer ID: 1 17 3' 70 1V 7 Chain of Custody# A C-- V' 0C/Pj # ownVOJ.I. Custody Seals oi shipping container intact? Yes [1 No [1 2. Custody Seals dated and signed? Yes[ j No[3. Chain-of-Custody record present? Yes 4. Cooler temperature  
Line 230: Line 227:
I. Reporting results.Oualifier Information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Ni-I, Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 470704 Prep Batch Number: 467615 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 467614 Sample ID Client ID 146590018 9527-0001  
I. Reporting results.Oualifier Information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Ni-I, Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 470704 Prep Batch Number: 467615 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 467614 Sample ID Client ID 146590018 9527-0001  
-004F 146590019 9527-0001-006F 146590020 9527-0001  
-004F 146590019 9527-0001-006F 146590020 9527-0001  
-007F 1200954979 Method Blank (MB)1200954980 146692033(9804-0000-Z124-0  
-007F 1200954979 Method Blank (MB)1200954980 146692033(9804-0000-Z124-0
: 1) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200954981 146692033(9804-0000-Z12-4-01)
: 1) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200954981 146692033(9804-0000-Z12-4-01)
Matrix Spike (MS)1200954982 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 7.Calibration Information:
Matrix Spike (MS)1200954982 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 7.Calibration Information:
Line 429: Line 426:
Comparison of split samples collected fiom sample measurement location #13 and analyzed using gamnma spectroscopyby off-site Vendor Laboratory.
Comparison of split samples collected fiom sample measurement location #13 and analyzed using gamnma spectroscopyby off-site Vendor Laboratory.
The standard sample was 9527-0001-013F, the comparison sample was 9527-0001-013FS.
The standard sample was 9527-0001-013F, the comparison sample was 9527-0001-013FS.
STANDARD COMPARISON Radionuclide Activity Standard Resolution Agreement Activity Standard Comparison Acceptable Value Error Range Value Error Ratio (Y/N)Cs-137 4.05E-1 3.00E-2 14 0.6-1.66 4.05E-1 3.51E-2 1.0 Y Comments/Corrective Actions: N/A Table is providedto show acceptance criteria used to assess split samples.Resotufia  
STANDARD COMPARISON Radionuclide Activity Standard Resolution Agreement Activity Standard Comparison Acceptable Value Error Range Value Error Ratio (Y/N)Cs-137 4.05E-1 3.00E-2 14 0.6-1.66 4.05E-1 3.51E-2 1.0 Y Comments/Corrective Actions: N/A Table is providedto show acceptance criteria used to assess split samples.Resotufia
: Srnn Range.4-7 O.S -20 8-15 0.6 -1.66 16 -50 0.75-1.33 51 -200 0.80 -1.25>200 0.85 -1.18 Performed By: Date Revi P/ 7 Date: J Wc 4 44! I e/>6az6 6r0 0 I -1 3-&--04Page 1 of 1 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2d Preliminary Data Forms (2 Pages)
: Srnn Range.4-7 O.S -20 8-15 0.6 -1.66 16 -50 0.75-1.33 51 -200 0.80 -1.25>200 0.85 -1.18 Performed By: Date Revi P/ 7 Date: J Wc 4 44! I e/>6az6 6r0 0 I -1 3-&--04Page 1 of 1 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2d Preliminary Data Forms (2 Pages)
P- -PELIMINARY DATA REVIEW FORM ----- ---- ------ -----WP&IRNo.: Survey Unit: Survey Unit Name: Classification:
P- -PELIMINARY DATA REVIEW FORM ----- ---- ------ -----WP&IRNo.: Survey Unit: Survey Unit Name: Classification:

Latest revision as of 18:05, 13 July 2019

Final Status Survey Final Report - Phase III, Book 3 of 8, Appendix A2, Survey Unit Release Record 9527-0001, East Mountain Side
ML061360339
Person / Time
Site: Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date: 04/11/2006
From: Mccarthy J, Randall D
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co
To:
Document Control Desk, NRC/FSME
References
9527-0001, CY-06-065
Download: ML061360339 (132)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:I-I q-- -.lm H__I _.I Final Status Survey Final Report Phase III Appendix A2 Survey Unit Release Record ok,- & 9527-0001, East Mountain Side 0 May 2006 CYAPCO FINAL STATUS SURVEY RELEASE RECORD EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 6:1 Prepared By.Reviewed By: FSS Engineer'FSS Engineer Date: 3/rcacu Date: le W Approved By: 14 A .Technical Support Manager Date: Y-1/ I-o Revision 0 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION ..................................................... 3 2. CLASSIFICATION BASIS ..................................................... 4 3. DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQO) ............................................ 5 4. SURVEY DESIGN .................................................... 8 5. SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION .................................................... 11 6. SURVEY RESULTS .................................................... I 1 7. QUALITY CONTROL .................................................... 15 8. INVESTIGATIONS AND RESULTS ................................................. 16 9. REMEDIATION AND RESULTS .................................................... 16 10. CHANGES FROM THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY PLAN .16 11. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT (DQA) .16 12. ANOMALIES .17 13. CONCLUSION .17 14. ATTACHMENTS .17 14.1 Attachment 1 -Figures (6 pages including cover)14.2 Attachment 2 -Sample and Statistical Data (108 pages including covers)Revision 0 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION Survey Unit 9527-0001 (East Mountain Side) is designated as Final Status Survey (FSS) Class 2 and consists of approximately 8,600 m 2 (2.13 acres) of wooded and wetland area located approximately 0.1 miles from the reference coordinate system benchmark used at Haddam Neck Plant (HNP) (see Attachment 1, Figure 1). The survey unit is bounded by a fence on the northern side, an unpaved road along the western side and a stone wall along the southern side. A Class 2 survey unit, 9527-0002, bounds this survey unit on the south. The survey unit comprises wooded terrain with some steep rock ledge and rock outcroppings within the interior.The reference coordinates associated with this survey unit are E013 through E022 by S056 through S064 (refer to License Termination Plan Section 5.4.4).The reference coordinates provide the maximum dimensions of a rectangle containing this survey unit. Some areas contained in this rectangle may not be part of this survey unit. The boundary of the survey unit was defined using a Global Positioning System (GPS).A review of the historical files indicates two (2) events potentially impacting this survey unit. Contamination was found in 1980 in uncontrolled areas including the East Mountain Side (refer to Plant Information Report PIR 80-37).Recently, tank farm tent material with low-level fixed contamination was found on the East Mountain Side (refer to Condition Report CR 05-0244). This material was found in another survey unit of 9527. Walkdowns of the remaining East Mountain Side did not identify more tent material. The single piece of tent material was found in Survey Unit 9527-0005 along the fence and about one hundred eighty (180) feet from the nearest boundary of 9527-0001. In Section 5.4.7.1 of the LTP, Equation 5-1 expresses the total dose contribution from three (3) components; soil contribution, existing groundwater contribution and future groundwater contribution. The survey data results for this release record address the dose contribution due to soil as provided in LTP Equation 5-1. This survey unit is considered impacted by existing groundwater radioactive contamination as the survey unit is within the capture zone perimeter for an affected monitoring well. The dose contribution from the existing groundwater contamination will be addressed later and will be included to show compliance with site unrestricted release criteria as required by the LTP. This survey unit is not considered impacted by future groundwater radioactive contamination, as there are no underground structures, systems or components containing residual radioactive material within the groundwater saturated zone in the area. The dose contribution from future groundwater, the third component of Equation 5-1, is therefore zero.Revision 0 3 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD 2. CLASSIFICATION BASIS The survey unit was classified in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-10,"Survey Unit Classification. " The historical information, scoping analyses and characterization results provided sufficient data to designate Survey Unit 9527-0001 as Class 2 in September 2005.The "Classification Basis Summary" conducted for this survey unit consisted of: a) A review of the 1OCFR50.75 (g) (1) database, b) A review of the "Initial Characterization Report" and the "Historic Site Assessment Supplement, " c) Historic and current survey records review, d) Visual inspections and a "walkdown." A review of the I OCFR50.75 (g) (1) database report identifies six (6) documents associated with or relating to this survey area.a) Event PIR 80-37: Contamination was documented to be present in an area outside the restricted area. Small areas of low-level contamination were found on the facility grounds through routine survey in a normally non-radioactive area. The areas were cleaned up in 1980.b) Radiological Assessment Branch (RAB) memo NE-83-RA-1374 (September 1983): Results of a contamination survey outside the southeast RCA boundary has identified plant related activity in an adjacent survey area to 9527. According to the memo, the source could have been the events described by PIR 80-37.c) Adverse Condition Report ACR 97-0994: Soil sample analysis identified plant related radioactivity on hillside east of plant (in another survey unit of 9527).d) Scoping Survey Report 1998: Results of scoping samples performed for decommissioning characterization data. Cesium-137 was the predominate radionuclide found in this survey unit during the scoping survey. No other plant-related radionuclides were identified in this survey unit.e) Event CR 05-0244: Tank farm material with low-level fixed contamination was found on the East Mountain Side in another survey unit of 9527. A single piece of tent material was found in Survey Unit 9527-0005 along the fence and about one hundred eight (180) feet from the nearest boundary of 9527-0001. f) Memo ISC 05-045: Periodic surveillance following final status survey.Surveillance is required periodically by the LTP to ensure the radiological condition does not significantly change from the FSS Revision 0 4 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD results. The memo documents no negative change in the radiological status.A review of the "Initial and Supplemental Characterization Reports" as well as the previous "Classification Basis Summaries" provided no additional information pertinent to classification. A characterization survey plan was initiated and executed by Site Closure personnel in September 2005 to determine existing conditions and obtain radiological data for Final Status Survey (FSS). No areas of elevated radioactivity were identified in the survey unit.Eleven (11) soil samples were taken initially and analyzed in accordance with the plan. The concentrations of Cs-137 found in the soil were slightly lower than those concentrations in wooded areas determined from off-site locations as documented by Health Physics Technical Support Document (TSD) BCY-HP-0063, "Background Cs-137 Concentration in Soil." Strontium-90 and Eu-154 were also identified in one (1) sample but not in sufficient quantities to be included with the characterization. The values for Cs-137 and Co-60 are provided in Table 1.Table 1 -Basic Statistical Quantities for Cesium-137 and Co-60 from the i__ _ _ _ Characterization Survey a _- ___- _____ i___-Parameter Cs-137 (pCiIg) -Co-60Cilg) Minimum Value: 9.66E-02 -4.93E-03 Maximum Value: 1.01 E+00 3.02E-02 Mean: 4.87E-01 1.07E-02 Median: 4.35E-01 9.21 E-03 Standard Deviation: 2.62E-0 1 1.29E-02 The FSS Engineer performed a visual inspection and walkdown during September 2005 to assess the physical condition of the survey unit, evaluate access points and travel paths and identify potentially hazardous conditions. Assessment of the groundwater impact is discussed in Section 1 and Section 13.The classification basis shows that the expected residual radioactivity in the survey unit would be below the site remediation criteria and are consistent with procedural guidance, thereby sufficient to justify the final designation as Class 2.3. DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQO)FSS design and planning is based on the Data Quality Objective (DQO) process as described by the LTP, Procedure RPM 5.1-1 1, "Preparation of Final Status Survey Plan," and the "Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual" (MARSSIM). A summary of the main features of the DQO process are provided herein.Revision 0 5 Revision 0 5 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD The DQO process incorporated hypothesis testing and probabilistic sampling distributions to control decision errors during data analysis. Hypothesis testing is a process based on the scientific method that compares a baseline condition to an alternate condition. The baseline condition is technically known as the null hypothesis. Hypothesis testing rests on the premise that the null hypothesis is true and that sufficient evidence must be provided for rejection. In designing the survey plan, the underlying assumption, or null hypothesis was that residual activity in the survey unit exceeded the release criteria. Rejection of the null hypothesis would satisfy the release criteria objective of the FSS. Probabilistic sampling is a preferred method to select a sample so that each item in the population being studied has a known likelihood of being included in the sample. Probabilistic sampling might include simple random sampling where every sample has the same chance of being included, or systematic random sampling where samples are arranged in some order and a random starting point is selected.The primary objective of the Final Status Survey Plan (FSSP) was to demonstrate that the level of residual radioactivity in this survey unit did not exceed the release criteria specified in the LTP and that the potential dose from residual radioactivity is As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).A fundamental precursor to survey design is to establish a relationship between the release criteria and some measurable quantity. This is done through the development of Derived Concentration Guideline Values (DCGLs). The DCGLs represent average levels of radioactivity above background levels and are presented in terms of surface or mass activity concentrations. Chapter 6 of the LTP describes in detail the modeling used to develop the DCGLs for soil (called Base Case Soil DCGL), existing groundwater radioactivity and additional future groundwater radioactivity from building basements and footings.A reduction to the Base Case Soil DCGLs provided in Chapter 6 of the LTP must be performed to ensure compliance with the release criteria of twenty-five millirem (25 mrem) in a year Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) when all three pathways (soil, existing groundwater and future groundwater) are potentially present. Chapter 5 of the LTP shows a compliance formula, Equation 5-1, for including the total dose from the three media. The reduced DCGL is called the Operational DCGL whose relationship to the Base Case Soil DCGL is shown by Equation 5-3 of the LTP. The Base Case Soil DCGL for Cs-137 and the DCGLs for all the other radionuclides potentially present in soil were administratively reduced by about 70% to ensure compliance with the 25 mrem in a year TEDE criterion (Table 2).Revision 0 6 Revision 0 6 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Table 2 -Radionuclide Specific Base Case Soil DCGL, Operational DCGLs and Required; Minimum Detectable Concentrations Radionuclide Base Case Soil Operatonal DCGL Required MDC DCGL (pai/g)(X ig 2 Cg H-3 4.12E+02 1.32E+02 1.65E+OI C-14 5.66E+00 1.81E+00 2.26E-01 Mn-54 1.74E+01 5.57E+00 0 6.96E-01 Fe-55 2.74E+04 8.77E+03 1. IOE+03 Co-60 3.81E+O0 1.22E+00 1.52E-01 Ag- 108m 7.14E+00 2.28E+00 2.86E-0 I Ni-63 7.23E+02 2.31 E+02 2.89E+O I Sr-90 1.55E+00 4.96E-0I 6.20E-02 Nb-94 7.12E+00 2.28E+00 2.85E-O I Tc-99 1.26E+01 4.03E+00 5.04E-01 Cs- 134 4.67E+00 1.49E+00 1.87E-01 Cs-137 7.91E+00 2.53E+00 3.16E-01 Eu-152 1.01E+0l 3.23E+00 4.04E-01 Eu-154 9.29E+00 2.97E+00 3.72E-01 Eu-155 3.92E+02 1.25E+02 1.57E+O 0 Pu-238 2.96E+01 9.47E+00 1.18E+00 Pu-239/240 2.67E+01 8.54E+00 1.07E+00 Pu-241 8.70E+02 2.78E+02 3.48E+01 Am-241 2.58E+01 8.26E+00 1.03E+O0 Cm-243/244 2.90E+01 9.28E+00 1.16E+O0 (I) The Base Case Soil DCGLs for soil are specified by the LTP in Chapter 6 (2) The Operational DCGL is equivalent to achieving 8 mrem per year TEDE (3) The required MDC was 12% of the Operational DCGL Another important facet of the DQO process is to identify the radionuclides of concern and determine the concentration variability. Eleven (I1) soils samples were collected and analyzed during characterization as discussed in Section 2.The samples were collected through biased sampling. Characterization included analyses for Hard to Detect (HTD) radionuclides. Cesium-137 was found to be the predominate radionuclide of concern in soil. Cobalt-60 was included in the survey design based on the 1997 scoping survey results. The mean and variability of Cs-137 and Co-60 in soil in this survey unit was determined during characterization. Instrument DQOs included a verification of the ability of the survey instrument to detect the radiation(s) of interest relative to the DCGL. Survey instrument response checks were to be performed before issue and after the instrument had been used. Control and accountability of survey instruments was to be maintained to assure the quality and prevent the loss of data.Revision 0 7 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Laboratory DQOs and analysis results were to be reported as actual calculated results. Results reported as less than Minimum Detectable Concentration (<MDC) would not be accepted for FSS. Sample report summaries were to include unique sample identification, analytical method, radionuclide, result, and uncertainty of two standard deviations, laboratory data qualifiers, units, and the required and observed MDC.4. SURVEY DESIGN The level of effort associated with planning a survey is based on the complexity of the survey and nature of the hazards. To assist the FSS Engineers when preparing survey plans for FSS, guidance is provided in Procedure RPM 5.1-11,"Preparation of Final Status Survey Plans". By design, the FSSP meets the ALARA criteria for soils as specified in Chapter 4 of the LTP. The FSSP uses an integrated sample design that combines scanning surveys and sampling which can be either random or biased.Eleven (11) data points from characterization were used to determine concentration variability. The samples were collected through biased sampling over a simple grid design. The DQO process determined that Cs-137 and Co-60 would be the radionuclide of concern for soil in this survey unit (refer to Section 3). The sum of fractions or unity rule will be used with the individual Operational DCGLs because multiple radionuclides (Cs-137 and Co-60) are considered in the survey design. Other radionuclides identified during FSS would be evaluated to ensure adequate survey design.Surrogate DCGLs were not required for this survey unit based on the HTD results and via screening under LTP Section 5.4.7.2. Radionuclide screening or de-selection is a process where an individual radionuclide or aggregate may be considered insignificant and eliminated from the FSS. The criteria for de-selection are concentrations less than 5% for individual radionuclides and less than 10% for aggregates. The Elevated Measurement Comparison (EMC) did not apply to this survey unit since discrete, elevated areas of contamination were not expected.The Sign Test was selected as the non-parametric statistical test. The use of the Sign Test did not require the selection or use of a background reference area, which simplified survey design and implementation. This approach was conservative since it included background Cs- 137 as part of the sample set.The number of soil samples for FSS was determined in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-12, "Determination of the Number of Samples for Final Status Survey." The Lower Bound of the Gray Region (LBGR) was set in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-11 to 0.79 to maintain the relative shift (A/v) in the range of I and 3. A Prospective Power Curve was generated using COMPASS, a software package developed under the sponsorship of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) for implementation of the MARSSIM in support of the decommissioning license termination rule (10 CFR Revision 0 8 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD 20, Subpart E). The result of the COMPASS computer run showed adequate power for the survey design. Survey design specified fifteen (15) surface soil samples for non-parametric statistical testing.The grid pattern and locations of the soil samples were determined using Visual Sample Plan (VSP) in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-14, "Identifying, and Marking Surface Sample Locations for Final Status Survey." Visual Sample Plan was created by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) for the United States Department of Energy. A systematic triangular grid pattern with a random starting point was selected for sample design, which is appropriate for a Class 2 area.Sample locations were identified using AutoCAD-Lt, a commercially available plotting software package with coordinates consistent with the Connecticut State Plane System. These coordinates were integrated with a GPS to locate sample locations in the field. Sample Measurement Locations for the design are listed with the GPS coordinates in Table 3.Table 3 -Sample Measurement Locations with.Associated GPS Coordinates Designation Northing tEastmig 9527-0001-OOIF 237268.05 668668.64 9527-0001 -002F 237268.05 668755.82 9527-0001-003F 237268.05 668843.00 9527-0001 -004F 237192.55 668450.69 9527-0001-00SF 237192.55 668537.87 9527-0001 -006F 237192.55 668625.05 9527-0001-007F 237192.55 668712.23 9527-0001-008F 237192.55 668799.41 9527-0001-009F 237117.05 668494.28 9527-0001-OIOF 237117.05 668581.46 9527-0001-01 IF 237117.05 668668.64 9527-0001-012F 237117.05 668755.82 9527-0001-013F 237041.55 668625.05 9527-0001-014F 237041.55 668712.23 9527-0001-01 SF 236966.06 668668.64 There were to be three (3) judgmental samples total for soil sampling. The soil sample locations would be determined based on professional judgment and observation during characterization and walkdowns to determine areas having the potential for residual radioactivity (e.g., runoff and collection, area disturbance). The number of judgmental samples represented about 20% of the number of samples that would be used for non-parametric statistical testing.Although Procedure RPM 5.1-11 only specified that 5% of the samples be selected for HTD analysis, at least three (3) soil samples or 20% of the number of samples that would be used for non-parametric statistical testing were randomly selected for HTD radionuclide analysis using the Microsoft Excel Revision 0 9 Revision 0 9 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD"RANDBETWEEN" function. Each sample would be sent off-site for a full suite analysis of the HTD radionuclides specified in the LTP, Table 2-12,"Radionuclides Potentially Present at Haddam Neck Plant." The implementation of survey specific quality control measures as referenced by Procedure RPM 5.1-24, "Split Sample Assessmentfor Final Status Survey, " included the collection of two (2) soil samples for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory. These locations were selected randomly using the Microsoft Excel "RANDBETWEEN" function. The number of quality control soil samples was determined to be 13% of fifteen (15) samples, rounded up to the next whole number.The LTP specifies that scanning will be performed in a combination of systematic and judgmental measurements for a Class 2 land area and cover 10%to 100% of the area. The fraction of scanning coverage was determined during the DQO process with the total amount and location(s) based on the likelihood of finding elevated activity during FSS. Approximately 25% of the survey unit was to be scanned based on the characterization survey and sampling results.For this Class 2 survey unit, the "Investigation Level" for area scanning and soil sample measurement results are those levels specified in LTP, Table 5-8,"Investigation Levels." Table 4 provides a synopsis of the survey design.Table 4-Synopsis of the Survey Deign Feature Design.Criteria

Basis Survey Unit Land Area 8,600 m 2 Based on AutoCAD-Lt and Visual Sample Plan calculations Type I and Type 2 errors were 0.05, sigma was 0.10, the Number of Measurements 15 LBGR was adjusted to 0.79 to maintain Relative Shift in the range of I and 3, Relative Shift was 2 Grid Spacing 20.74 Based on triangular grid Interval Spacing 17.96 Based on triangular grid Operational DCGL 2.53 pCi/g Cs-137 Administratively set to achieve 1.22 pCi/g Co-60 8 mrem in a year TEDE Scan Survey Area The LTP requires >10% area Ca veyrge 25% of the area coverage for Class 2 Survey Coverage Units...Detectable over Based on achieving the background Operational DCGL Revision 0 10 Revision 0 10 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD 5. SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION Final status survey field activities were conducted under Work Plan and Inspection Record (WP&IR) 2005-0054.

The WP&IR package included a detailed FSSP, job safety analysis, job planning checklist and related procedures for reference. Daily briefings were conducted to discuss the expectations for job performance and the safety aspects of the survey. The "Daily Survey Journal" was used to document field activities and other information pertaining to the FSS.Survey activities occurred September 13, 2005 through September 22, 2005.The scan areas were marked out and scanned for elevated readings (see Attachment 2 for Scan Area Results). Scanning was performed with an Eberline E-600 using a SPA-3 sodium iodide detector. The E-600 was operated in the rate-meter mode and used with audio response. The probe was positioned as close to the ground as possible and was moved at a scan speed of about 0.5 meters per second.Using GPS coordinates, sample measurement locations were identified and marked with a surveyor's flag for identification. At each sample measurement location, a one (1) meter radius around the sample flag was scanned for elevated radiation levels.Fifteen (15) surface soil samples were collected and packaged in accordance with Haddam Neck Plant (HNP) Procedure RPM 5.1-3, "Collection of Sample Media for Final Status Survey" and FSS design. Samples were controlled, transported, stored, and transferred to the off-site laboratory using Chain-of-Custody (COC) protocol in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-5, "Chain of Custody for Final Status Survey Samples. " Three (3) soil samples (9527-0001-004F, 9527-0001-006F and 9527-0001-007F) were randomly selected for HTD radionuclide analysis by the off-site laboratory. Three (3) biased soil samples (9527-0001-016F through 9527-0001-018F) were collected and analyzed by the off-site laboratory for gamma spectroscopy. The implementation of survey specific quality control measures included the collection of two (2) samples (9527-0001 -OIOF and 9527-0001-013F) for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory.

6. SURVEY RESULTS The eighteen (18) soil sample measurement locations identified in the FSS plan and Addendum were scanned about a one (1) meter radius for elevated radiation levels. Table 5 provides an overview of the scan area survey. Scan area results are provided in Attachment 2.Revision 0 I1I EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Table 5- Scan Area Results for Sample Measurement Locations Measurement Reading Action Level Above Action Level 'Location (kcpm) (kpm)1 8.87 8.91 No 2 7.67 8.63 No 3 8.94 10.5 No 4 7.93 9.43 No 5 10.4 12.9 No 6 9.12 12.2 No 7 8.42 9.57 No 8 8.20 9.92 No 9 10.7 12.4 No 10 10.1 11.7 No 11 9.97 10.9 No 12 11.1 12.2 No 13 12.7 13.9 No 14 11.3 13.5 No 15 13.6 14.7 No 16 9.27 10.0 No 17 9.10 9.27 No 18 9.90 11.2 No (I) FSS sample plans require movement of the sample measurement location to the area within the 1 meter radius yielding the response above the action level Twenty-two areas were scanned for elevated radiation levels. Several elevated areas were identified.

Table 6 provides an overview of the scan area survey.Scan area results are provided in Attachment 2.Table 6- Scan Area Results Sa iLogged Action Elevated Reading Investigation Scan ogged Level Area Reading (kcpm) Identification () Sample (kcpm) 102_on-_oleatdon 1 8.42 10.2 None -no elevated None areas identified 2 8.46 9.61 None -no elevated None areas identified 3 10.9 10.2 9527-01-SC-01-25-0 None"(4 11.3 12.6 None -no elevated None areas identified 5 12.1 12.0 9527-01-SC-01-42-0 None (I Revision 0 12 Revision 0 12 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Table 6- Scan Area Results Highest Ato Scan Logged Acon Elevated Reading Investigation Area Reading (kpm) Identificaon Sample ( k c m )_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _6 10.5 11.5 None- no elevated None areas identified 7 9.84 10.5 None -no elevated None areas identified 8 9.75 10.2 None -no elevated None 8_ _ 9.75_ 10.2areas identified 9 10.1 11.3 None -no elevated None areas identified 10 9.81 10.7 None -no elevated None areas identified 11 9.52 10.9 None -no elevated None areas identified 12 10.7 12.5 None- no elevated None areas identified 13 11.1 12.6 None -no elevated None areas identified 14 10.5 10.9 None -no elevated None areas identified 15 10.7 11.3 None -no elevated None areas identified 16 8.44 9.30 None -no elevated None areas identified 17 7.50 8.23 None- no elevated None areas identified 18 9.56 9.87 None -no elevated None areas identified 19 8.48 8.90 None -no elevated None areas identified 20 9.31 10.2 None -no elevated None areas identified 21 11.3 11.7 None -no elevated None areas identified __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _22 11.7 13.0 None -no elevated None____ ___ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ areas identified (1) SC is nomenclature associated with the barcodes used in the field where SC refers to Scan (2) Refer to Section 8 for additional details The off-site laboratory employed for the radiological analyses of samples was General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) -Charleston, South Carolina. The laboratory analyzed the fifteen (15) samples taken for non-parametric statistical testing and the associated duplicates using gamma spectroscopy. Gamma spectroscopy analysis was performed to the required MDC. Gamma Revision 0 13 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD spectroscopy results identified some radionuclides meeting the accepted criteria for detection (i.e., a result greater than two standard deviations uncertainty). All could be de-selected or excluded using the 5% and 10% rule described in Section 4.Cesium-137 was identified in all fifteen (15) samples. The mean of the results of gamma spectrometry analysis for each of the samples indicated Cs-137 at levels lower than the concentrations of Cs-137 found in soil at off-site locations within the vicinity of the HNP as presented in the Health Physics TSD BCY-HP-0063. Cobalt-60 was only identified in one (1) of the fifteen (15) samples.None of the samples exceeded 58% of the Operational DCGL. Sample analysis did not require further investigation. A summary of the sample results is provided in Table 7.Table 7- Summary o Soil Sample Results-Sample Number Cs-137 Co-60 Fraction of the Sampe NpCi/g Operational DCGL 9527-0001 -001 F 5.19E-01 1.26E-02 0.215 9527-0001-002F 2.43E-01 2.43E-02 0.116 9527-0001 -003F 8.83E-01 -4.47E-03 0.345 9527-0001-004F 4.40E-01 1.OOE-02 0.182 9527-0001-005F 3.122E-01 4.45E-03 0.127 9527-0001-006F 5.55E-01 2.08E-02 0.236 9527-0001-007F 5.63E-01 -9.59E-03 0.215 9527-0001-008F 4.16E-01 1.91 E-02 0.180 9527-0001-009F 8.07E-01 6.04E-03 0.324 9527-0001-OIOF 3.31E-01 2.50E-02 0.151 9527-0001-011IF 5.02E-01 -1.63E-04 0.198 9527-0001-012F 1.48E+00 -5.98E-03 0.580 9527-0001-013F 4.05E-01 -1.63E-02 0.147 9527-0001-014F 4.50E-01 1.61 E-02 0.191 9527-0001-01 SF 2.69E-01 1.19E-02 0.116 (I) The Operational DCGLs are 2.53 pCi/g for Cs-137 and 1.22 pCi/g for Co-60 used in conjunction with the unity rule The off-site laboratory also processed three (3) samples for HTD analysis as required by the sample plan. The requested analyses included alpha spectroscopy, gas proportional counting, and liquid scintillation depending on the radionuclide and the measurement method. All analyses met the required MDC. Two (2) of the HTD radionuclides met the accepted criteria for detection (i.e., a result greater than two standard deviations uncertainty) in more than one sample. A result greater than two standard deviations uncertainty was reported once for Sr-90. Table 8 lists the results for the HTD radionuclides that could not be de-selected based on the 5% and 10% rules.Revision 0 14 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Table 5-Hard-to-Jetect Sam le Results Fraction of Sr-90 C-14 Tc-99 the Sample pCi/g pCil -pCi0g Operational _______ ______L evel(1 9527-0001-004F 2.05E-02 1.15E-01 2.37E-01 0.164 9527-0001-006F -1.88E-02 1.03E-01 2.OOE-01 0.069 9527-0001-007F -1.03E-03 1.36E-01 1.07E-01 0.100 (I) The Operational DCGLs are 0.496 pCi/g for Sr-90,1.81 pCi/g for C-14 and 4.03 pCi/g for Tc-99 used in conjunction with the unity rule Three (3) biased samples were collected at locations selected by FSS Supervision based on professional judgment and observation. Gamma spectroscopy analysis was performed by the off-site laboratory to the required MDC. None of the samples exceeded 25% of the Operational DCGL. No further action or investigations were required (see Table 9).Table 9 -Biased Sameeslt& n-Fraction' of the Sample Number C0/37C Operational 9527-0001-016F 5.95E-01 1.24E-02 0.245 9527-0001-017F 4.19E-01 -3.49E-03 0.163 9527-0001-018Ft -5.71 E-01 -1.69E-03 0.224 (1) The Operational DCGLs are 2.53 pCi/g for Cs-137 and 1.22 pCi/g for Co-60 used in conjunction with the unity rule 7. QUALITY CONTROL The off-site laboratory processed the split samples and performed gamma spectroscopy analysis. Thirteen percent (13%) of the samples were selected for analysis, which exceeds the 5% minimum required by the LTP. The data were evaluated using USNRC acceptance criteria specified in Inspection Procedure 84750 as detailed in HNP Procedure RPM 5.1-24, "Split Sample Assessment for Final Status Survey." There was acceptable agreement between the field split results for sample 9527-0001-013F. There was unacceptable agreement between field split results for Cs-137 in sample 9527-0001-OIOF which was identified under Condition Report (CR) 05-0781. Evaluation of the data using the reported results for NORM resulted in acceptable agreement. The source of the disagreement for Cs-137 is likely a disproportionate amount of organic material in the field splits. A review of the Daily Survey Journals (field notes)and interviews with FSS Supervision indicate this to be the apparent cause.Field Supervision recalls that the rocky terrain and undergrowth made sample collection difficult. Revision 0 1 5 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD The sample analysis vendor, General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) -Charleston, South Carolina, maintained quality control and quality assurance plans as part of normal operation. Refer to Attachment 2 for data and data quality analysis results.8. INVESTIGATIONS AND RESULTS Additional scanning was performed in two (2) small locations in March 2006 to obtain additional data relevant to the DQOs. The scanning was performed in two (2) strips approximately three (3) feet wide by thirty (30) long in scan area 3 and scan area 5. No elevated readings were identified.

9. REMEDIATION AND RESULTS Historically, no radiological remedial action as described by MARSSIM Section 5.4 was performed in this survey unit prior to or as a result of the FSS. Health Physics TSD BCY-HP-0078, "ALARA Evaluation of Soil Remediation in Support of Final Status Survey," determined that remediation beyond that required to meet the release criteria to be unnecessary and that the remaining residual radioactivity in soil was ALARA.10. CHANGES FROM THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY PLAN Three (3) HTD radionuclides were reported in concentrations exceeding the 5%and 10% rule for de-selection.

Therefore, the individual Operational DCGLs for Sr-90, C-14 and Tc-99 were included into sample design in conjunction with the unity rule to ensure adequate survey design in accordance with the DQOs.The result of the COMPASS computer run showed adequate power and maintained the original fifteen (15) surface soil samples for non-parametric statistical testing.11. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT (DQA)The DQO sample design and data were reviewed in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-23, "Data Quality Assessment, " for completeness and consistency. The sampling design had adequate power as indicated by the Retrospective Power Curve. The Sign Test was performed on the data and compared to the original assumptions of the DQOs. The Sign Test shows that the survey unit passes FSS.Documentation was complete and legible. Surveys and sample collection were consistent with the DQOs and were sufficient to ensure that the survey unit was properly designated as Class 2.The preliminary data review consisted of calculating basic statistical quantities (e.g., mean, median, standard deviation). Revision 0 16 Revision 0 16 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD The range of the data, about 3.7 standard deviations, was not unusually large.The difference between the mean and median was 30% of the standard deviation which indicates positive skewness in the data. The data was represented graphically through posting plots, a frequency plot, and a quantile plot. The frequency plot shows significant positive skewness as confirmed by the calculated skew of 1.0 and is probably due to the differences in terrain and the collection of runoff.All data, assessments, and graphical representations are provided in Attachment 2.12. ANOMALIES No anomalies were noted.13. CONCLUSION Survey Unit 9527-0001 has met the final DQOs of the FSS. The ALARA criteria for soils as specified in Chapter 4 of the LTP were achieved. Elevated Measurement Comparison and remediation was not required.The sample data passed the Sign Test. The null hypothesis was rejected.Graphical representation of data indicates significant positive skewness as that is probably due to the differences in terrain and the collection of runoff. The Retrospective Power Curve generated using COMPASS shows adequate power was achieved. The survey unit was properly designated as Class 2.As discussed in Section 1, the survey data results for this release record address the dose contribution due to soil as provided in LTP Equation 5-1. This survey unit is considered impacted by existing groundwater radioactive contamination as the survey unit is within the capture zone perimeter for an affected monitoring well. The dose contribution from the existing groundwater contamination will be addressed later and will be included to show compliance with site unrestricted release criteria as required by the LTP. This survey unit is not considered impacted by future groundwater radioactive contamination, as there are no underground structures, systems or components containing residual radioactive material within the groundwater saturated zone in the area. The dose contribution from future groundwater, the third component of Equation 5-1, is therefore zero.14. ATTACHMENTS 14.1 Attachment I -Figures 14.2 Attachment 2 -Sample and Statistical Data Revision 0 1 7 Revision 0 17 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 1 Figures (5 pages) (-)Reference Coordinate System Benchmark-I TR GA 38 / r-#;- -RR636.A 1 I Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Date By Figure 1 Site Map With Reference To Survey Unit 9527-0001 March 2006 J MC C-) ) stear'Legend Stone wall 0 35 70 0.56 I'I-, o.31 O.*5 0.40Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 9527-0001 Final Status Survey Cs-137 Posting Plot ) Streoa('Legend<>> Stone wall35 70 Nots 9 -o Refr to Tablc 6for scam W e 7 Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 9527-0001 Final Status Survey Scan Areas (5-Streorn Legend 1 Sample Location 0 35 70 Fot Norme Refiv to Table 9for biased&spkzemult -- --v -_ _ _ _ _ /-Ile e Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 9527-0001 Biased and Investigation Sample Locations EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2 Sample and Statistical Data EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2a Sample Data (80 Pages) Table of Contents General Narrative ........................................................ 1 Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation ........... 4 Radiological Analysis ..... .. ............................................ 9 Sample Data Summary ............................................. 25 Quality Control Data ...................... ....................... 70 General Narrative 1 CASE NARRATIVE For CONNECTICUT YANKEE RE: Soils PO# 002332 Work Order: 146590 SDG: MSR #05-2329 October 19, 2005 Laboratory Identification: General Engineering Laboratories, LLC Mailing Address: P.O. Box 30712 Charleston, South Carolina 29417 Express Mail Delivery and Shipping Address: 2040 Savage Road Charleston, South Carolina 29407 Telephone Number: (843) 556-8171 Summary: Sample receipt The samples for the Soil Project for work order 146590 arrived at General Engineering Laboratories, LLC, (GEL) in Charleston, South Carolina on September 28, 2005. All sample containers arrived without any visible signs of tampering or breakage. The chain of custody contained the proper documentation and signatures. The laboratory received the following samples: Sample ID Client Sample ID 146590001 9527-0001-OOIF 146590002 9527-0001-002F 146590003 9527-0001-003F 146590004 9527-0001-005F 146590005 9527-0001-008F 146590006 9527-0001-009F 146590007 9527-0001-OlOF 146590008 9527-0OI-OIOFS GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP INC.P.O. Box 30712

  • Charleston.

SC 29417

  • 2040 Savage Road (29407)Phone (843) 556-8171
  • Fax843) 766-1178
  • www.gel com Sample ID 146590009 146590010 146590011 146590012 146590013.146590014 146590015 146590016 146590017 146590018 146590019 146590020 Client SampIe ID 9527-0001-01 IF 9527-0001-012F 9527-0001-013F 9527-0001-013FS 9527-0001-014F 9527-0001-01SF 9527-0001-016F 9527-0001-017F 9527-0001-018F 9527-0001-004F 9527-0001-006F 9527-0001-007F Items of Note: There are no items of note.Case Narrative:

Sample analyses were conducted using methodology as outlined in General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) Standard Operating Procedures. Any technical or administrative problems during analysis, data review, and reduction are listed below by analytical parameter. Analytical Request: Seventeen soil samples were analyzed for FSSGAM.Three soil samples were analyzed for FSSALL Internal Chain of Custody: Custody was maintained for all the samples.Data Package: The enclosed data package contains the following sections: Case Narrative, Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation and all analytical fractions. I certify that this data package is in compliance with the SOW, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained in this hard copy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or a designee, as verified by the following signature. Cheryl Jones Project Manager GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC a Member of THE GEL GROUP, INC.P.O. Box 30712

  • Charleston, SC 29417
  • 2040 Savage Road (29407)Phone (843) 556-8171
  • Fax (843) 768-1178
  • www.gel.com 3

Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation 4 Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5104-003-Attachment B-CY-00 I Major Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Chain of Custody Form No. 2005-00401 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning -Analyses Requested Lab Use Only Contact Name & Phone: Comments: Pete Hollenbeck 860-267-3923 Media Sample Container__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Code Type Size-Analytical Lab (Name, City, State): Code &Type General Engineering Laboratories Code 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 ATT: Cheryl Jones (843-556-8171) Priority:II30D.O 15D.07D. i. $Other: jP~, VA' ~ksk______ _____________ Sample Designation Date Time L IL. Comment, Preservation Lab Sample ID 9527-0001-OOlF 9/20/05 1010 TS G BP X I" 9527-0001-002F 9/19/05 0820 TS G BP X ----9527-0001-003F 9/19/05 0825 TS G BP X _9527-0001-004F 9/19/05 1415 TS G BP X ___9527-0001-OOSF 9/19/05 1410 TS G BP X = =_._._=9527-0001-006F 9/19/05 0855 TS G BP X 9527-0001-007F 9/19/05 0907 TS G BP X _9527-0001-008F 9/20/05 1004 TS G BP X -9527-0001-009F 9/19/05 1405 TS G BP X --9527-0001-OIOF 9/19/05 1503 TS G BP X _9527-0001-OIOFS 9/19/05 1503 TS G BP X ----NOTES: PO #: 002332 MSR #: 05-2329 U LTP QA C Radwaste QA E Non QA Samples Shipped Via: Internal Container 0 Fed Ex Temp.: ' Deg. C O UPS E Hand Custody Sealed?Y N I) R Date/Time

2) Rcceiv& Bwj Date/Time Custody Seal Intact?2 se 'h7/sZ /3e = Ae L- o o Other ,yelinquished By Date/Time
4) Received By Date/Time 7Bil 7o3 L 70 7Z7 Y N Bill of Lading # .5) Relinquished By Date/Time
6) Received By Date/twime Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGQR-R5104-003-Attachment B-CY-001 Major Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Chain of Custody Form No. 2005-00402 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, CT 06424 860-267-2556 Project Name: Haddam Neck Decommissioning Analyses Requested Lab Use Only Contact Name & Phone: Comments: Pete Hollenbeck 860-267-3923 Media Sample Container__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Code Type Size-Analytical Lab (Name, City, State): Code &Type General Engineering Laboratories Code 2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 ATT: Cheryl Jones ( 843-556-8171)

Priority: 30 D. E 15 D. El 7 D.Other: ___Sample Designation Date Time Comment, Preservation Lab Sample ID 9527-0001-01 IF 9/19/05 1050 TS G BP X 9527-0001-012F 9/19/05 1042 TS G BP X -9527-0001-013F 9/19/05 1508 TS G BP X ---9527-0001-013FS 9/19/05 1508 TS G BP X 9527-0001-014F 9/19/05 1455 TS G BP X 9527-0001-015F 9/19/05 1451 TS G BP X ---9527-0001-016F 9/19/05 1400 TS G BP X -9527-0001-017F 9/19/05 1356 TS G BP X --9527-0001-018F 9/19/05 1352 TS G BP X NOTES: PO # 002332 MSR #:05-2329 U LTP QA E Radwaste QA E Non QA Samples Shipped Via: Internal Container 0 Fed Ex Temp.: o~3Deg. C Ol UPS.Hand Custody Sealed?Y N 1)R finqoe y Date/Time

2) Received By // j Date/Time Custody Seal Intact?VP 4/ /A4,..- 1 ! _ a Other 3kelinquished By Date/Time
4) Received By Date/Time 79/7B3l 7fL ai7 gYI N.RBill of Lading #5) Relinquished By Date/Time
6) Received By Date/Time Connecticut Yankee Statement of Work for Analytical Lab Services.cY-ISC-sOw-o0l Figure 1. Sample Check-in List Date/Time Received:

1 V8 O~fX .SDG#: SRtaS- oA9 Work Order Number: Jg ~696 Shipping Cdhtainer ID: 1 17 3' 70 1V 7 Chain of Custody# A C-- V' 0C/Pj # ownVOJ.I. Custody Seals oi shipping container intact? Yes [1 No [1 2. Custody Seals dated and signed? Yes[ j No[3. Chain-of-Custody record present? Yes 4. Cooler temperature .- l & cZn 5. Vermiculite/packing materials is: Wet [ Dry [1 ] V^.L-6. Number of samples in shipping container: da Of 7. Sample holding times exceeded? Yes [] No 8. Samples have: ' t/t~aahazard labels custody seals appropriate sample labels 9. Samples are:__in good condition leaking broken have air bubbles 10. Were any anomalies identified in sample receipt? Yes [ I No 11. Description of anomalies (include sample numbers): Sy Sample Custodian/Laboratory: )- Date:- dg-is--5.1 Telephoned to: On .By_7 SAMPLE RECEIPT & REVIEW FORM.PM age only Date Received: M M Review (ensure non-conforming it( a a P rior to signuing): Received By: God_ _ __ _ S t -_U,, Sample Receipt Criteria ; z Comments/Qualifiers (Required for Non-Conforming Items)I Shipping containers received intact C _ ircle Applicable: seals broken damaged container leaking container other (describe) and sealed? __II Samples requiring cold ircle Coolant N ice bags blue ice dry ice none oter describe)2 preservation within (4 +/- 2 C)?Record preservation method. _3 Chain of custody documents_included with shipment?_ nSaple containers intact and _ _ rcle Applicable: seals broken damaged container leaking container other (describe) 4 sealed?5 Samples requiring chemical Sap containers affected and observcd pH:_ preservation at proper pH?6 VOA vials free of headspace ample ID's containers aficcted: 6 (defined as < 6mm bubble)?Are Encore containers present?7 (If yes, immediately deliver to VOA laboratory) 8 Samples received within holding _dra and tes. affected: t time?_ Sample ID's on COC match ID's ample ID's and containers affecied \_ on bottles?10 Date & time on COC match date ample ID's affected:_&time on bottles?__\ Number of containers received Sample ID's affected: match number indicated on COC?12 COC form is properly signed in relinquished/received sections?14 Air Bill Tracking #s, &Additional Comments' RSO RAD Receipt __c a ,l3 -if > x2 area background is observed on samples identified as 'non-Suspected Hazard Information z ' regulated/non-radioactive', contact the Radiation Safety group for finrher_ _ _ _a:__ _ _ _ _ _investigation. Radiological Classification? Maxium Counts Observed*: G?B PCB Regulated? Comments: Shipped as =P01 Hazardous C Material? If yes, contact Waste Hazard Class Shipped: Manager or ESH Manager. _PM (or PMA) review of Hazard classification: Initials -Date: 8 RADIOLOGICAL ANALYS I S 9 Radiochemistry Case Narrative Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. (YANK)SDG MSR#05-2329 Method/Analysis Information Product: Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 471786 Prep Batch Number: 467615 Dry Soil Prep GLRAD-A-021 Batch Number: 467614 Sample ID Client ID 146590018 9527-0001-004F 146590019 9527-0001-006F 146590020 9527-0001-007F 1200957639 Method Blank (MB)1200957640 146590018(9527-00014)04F) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200957641 146590018(9527-0001-004F) Matrix Spike (MS)1200957642 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-01 I REV# 14.Calibration Information: Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards. Oualitv Control (OC) Information: Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146590018 (9527-0001-004F). QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information: Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.10 Preparation Information AN preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis. Miscellaneous Information: NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.Oualifier Information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-I l-RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 471787 Prep Batch Number: 467615 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 467614 Sample ID Client ID 146590018 9527-0001 -004F 146590019 9527-0001 -006F 146590020 9527-0001-007F 1200957643 Method Blank (MB)1200957644 146590018(9527-0001 -004F) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200957645 146590018(9527-0001-004F) Matrix Spike (MS)1200957646 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-0l1 REV# 14.Calibration Information: Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards. Ouality Control (OC1 Information: Blank Information 11 The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146590018 (9527-0001-004F). QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information: Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis. Miscellaneous Information: NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.Oualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/An2avsis Information Product: Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-l -RC Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 471788 Prep Batch Number: 467615 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 467614 Sample ID Client ID 146590018 9527-0001-004F 146590019 9527-0001-006F 146590020 9527-0001-007F 1200957647 Method Blank (MB)1200957648 146590018(9527-0001-004F) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200957649 146590018(9527-0001-004F) Matrix Spike (MS)1200957650 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-035 REV# 7.Calibration Information: 12 Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards. Oualitv Control (00 Information: Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146590018 (9527-0001-004F). QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information: Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis. Miscellaneous Information: NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.Oualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: GFPC, Sr90, solid -0.025 pCi/g Analytical Method: EPA 905.0 Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 472639 Prep Batch Number: 467615 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 467614 Sample ID Client ID 13 146590018 9527-0001 -004F 146590019 9527-0001 -006F 146590020 9527-0001-007F 1200959675 Method Blank (MB)1200959676 146590019(9527-0001-006F) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200959677 146590019(9527-0001-006F) Matrix Spike (MS)1200959678 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-004 REV# 9.Calibration Information: Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards. OualitV Control (OC Information: Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146590019 (9527-0001-006F). QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information: Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis. Chemical Recoveries All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.Miscellaneous Information: NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.14 qualifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Analytical Batch Number: 468332 Sample ID Client ID 146590018 9527-0001-004F 146590019 9527-0001 -006F 146590020 9527-0001-007F 1200949447 Method Blank (MB)1200949448 146692033(9804-0000-ZI 2-4-01) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200949449 146692033(9804-0000-Z12-4-01) Matrix Spike (MS)1200949450 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-005 REV# 12.Calibration Information: Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards. Ouality Control (OC) Information: Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146692033 (9804-0000-Z12-4-01). QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information: Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis. 15 Miscellaneous Information: NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.Ouslifier information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Fe-I, Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 473150 Prep Batch Number: 467615 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 467614 Sample ID Client ID 146590018 9527-0001 -004F r46590019 9527-0001-006F 146590020 9527-0001-007F 1200960974 Method Blank (MB)1200960975 146692033(9804-000-Z1 2-4-01) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200960976 146692033(9804-0000-Z1 24-01) Matrix Spike (MS)1200960977 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-040 REV# 3.Calibration Information: Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards. Ouality Control (OC) Information: Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146692033 (9804-0000-Zl2-4-01). QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.16 Technical Information: Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples were reprepped due to the quench number being outside the calibration range.Miscellaneous Information: NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. The following NCR was generated for this SDG: NCR 260476 was generated due to Container scanning event for custody missed. 1. The analyst did not scan the samples 146590018, 146590019, 146590020, 146692033, and 146692034 into the batch prior to analysis, however the samples did remain in their custody at all times. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the proper scanning procedures. I. Reporting results.Oualifier Information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Analytical Method: DOE RESL Ni-I, Modified Prep Method: Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 470704 Prep Batch Number: 467615 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number: 467614 Sample ID Client ID 146590018 9527-0001 -004F 146590019 9527-0001-006F 146590020 9527-0001 -007F 1200954979 Method Blank (MB)1200954980 146692033(9804-0000-Z124-0

1) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200954981 146692033(9804-0000-Z12-4-01)

Matrix Spike (MS)1200954982 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 7.Calibration Information: Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).17 Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards. Quality Control (OC) Information: Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146692033 (9804-0000-Z12-4-01). QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information: Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis. Miscellaneous Information: NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.qualifier Information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid -1 to 2 pCi/g Analytical Method: EPA 906.0 Modified Analytical Batch Number: 467508 Sample ID Client ID 146590018 9527-0001-004F 146590019 9527-0001-006F 146590020 9527-0001-007F 1200947551 Method Blank (MB)1200947552 145495003(9802-0000-003RA-SBIV) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200947553 145495003(9802-0000-003RA-SBIV) Matrix Spike (MS)1200947554 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-002 REV# 10.Calibration Information: 18 Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards. Ouality Control (OC) Information: Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 145495003 (9802-0000-003RA-SBIV). QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information: Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Samples 1200947553 (9802-0000-003RA-SBIV) and 1200947554 (LCS) were recounted due to low/high recovery.Miscellaneous Information: NCR Documentation Nonconformnance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.Oualifier Information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analvsis Information Product: Liquid Scint C14, Solid AllFSS Analytical Method: EPA EERF C-01 Modified Analytical Batch Number: 470741 Sample ID Client ID 146590018 9527-0001-004F 146590019 9527-0001-006F 146590020 9527-0001-007F 1200955096 Method Blank (MB)1200955097 146692033(9804-0000-Z1 2-4-01) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200955098 146692033(9804-0000-Z 12-4-01) Matrix Spike (MS)1200955099 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)19 SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-003 REV# 8.Calibration Information: Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards. Oualitv Control (0C) Information: Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146692033 (9804-0000-Z124-01). QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information: Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis None of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis. Miscellaneous Information: NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.Oualifier Information Manual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis Information Product: GammaSolid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Analytical Method: EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Prep Method: Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number: 467961 Prep Batch Number: 467614 20 Sample ID Client ID 146590001 9527-0001-OOIF 146590002 9527-0001-002F 146590003 9527-0001-003F 146590004 9527-0001-00SF 146590005 9527-0001-008F 146590006 9527-0001-009F 146590007 9527-0001-01 OF 146590008 9527-0001-01 OFS 146590009 9527-0001-01 IF 146590010 9527-0001-012F 146590011 9527-0001-013F 146590012 9527-0001-013FS 146590013 9527-0001-014F 146590014 9527-0001-015F 146590015 9527-0001-016F 146590016 9527-0001-017F 146590017 9527-0001-018F 146590018 9527-0001-004F 146590019 9527-0001-006F 146590020 9527-0001-007F 1200948602 Method Blank (MB)1200948603 146590001(9527-0001-OOIF) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200948604 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General Engineering Laboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed in accordance with GL-RAD-A-013 REV# 10.Calibration Information: Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample Geometry All counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards. Ouality Control (OC) Information: Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146590001 (9527-0001-OOIF). QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.Technical Information: 21 Holding Time All sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysis Sample 146590001 (9527-0001 -001 F) was recounted due to high relative percent difference/relative error ratio.Miscellaneous Information: NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referenced SOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.qualifier information Qualifier Reason Analyte Sample UTData rejected due to interference. Europium-155 146590008 U_ Data rejected due to low abundance. Actinium-228 146590002 Cesium-134 1200948603 146590001 146590003 146590004 146590007 146590008 146590009 X ____X ___146590014 ____ ___ ___ _X 146590016 Lead-214 1200948602 Silver-108m 1200948602 Certification Statement Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative. Review Validation: GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data designated for CLP or CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.The following data validator verified the Information presented in this case narrative: q FUjj feC& Lo Lb tola I a I S Reviewer: 22 General Engineering Laboratories Form GEL-NCR Rev. 06105 NCR Report No.: 262902 Revision No.: 1 COMPANY -WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr. Division: Quality Criteria: Type: 27-OCT-05 Radiochemistry Specifications Process Instrument Type: Test I Method: Matrix Type: Client Code: GAMMA SPECTROMETER EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Solid YANK Batch ID: Sample Numbers: 467961 See Below Potentially affected work order(sXSDG): 146590(MSR#05-2329) Application Issues: Failed RPD for DUP Specification and Requirements NRG Disposition: Nonconformance

== Description:==

1. The relative percent difference for Bi-214 and Ra-226 does not meet 1. Reporting results.the client requirements.

Bi-214 and Ra-226 are naturally occurring isotopes.Originators Name: Jodi Cummings Quality Review: Data Validator/Group Leader: Melanie Aycock 28-OCT-05 28-OCT-05 Director: Page 1 23 General Engineering Laboratories Form GEL-NCR Rev. 06/05 NCR Report No.: 260476 Revision No.: COMPANY -WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Mo.Day Yr. Division: Quality Criteria: Type: 20-OCT-05 Radiochemistry Specifications Process Instrument Type: Test I Method: Matrix Type: Client Code: LSC DOE RESL Fe-1i Modified Solid YANK Batch ID: Sample Numbers: 473150 See Below Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG): 146590(MSR#05-2329),146692(MSR#05-2332) Application Issues: Container scanning event for custody missed Specification and Requirements NRG Disposition: Nonconformance

== Description:==

1. The analyst did not scan the samples 146590018, 146590019, 1. Reporting results.146590020, 146692033, and 146692034 into the batch prior to analysis, however the samples did remain in their custody at all times. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the proper scanning procedures.

Originators Name: Melanie Aycock Quality Review: 20-OCT-05 Data Validator/Group Leader Theresa Parrotte 20-OCT-05 Director: Page 1 24 SAMPLE DATA

SUMMARY

25 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report for YANK00I Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.Client SDG: MSR#05-2329 GEL Work Order: 146590 The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:* Indicates that a quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria.< Result is less than amount reported.> Result is greater than amount reported.B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.D Sample has been diluted and reanalyzed after initially exceeding inst. calibration range E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.P The response between the confirmation and the primary columns is >40% Different. R Sample results are rejected.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.Ul Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound.Z Paint Filter qualifier: Particulates passed through the filter. No free liquids were observed.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.ND The analyte concentration is not detected above the reporting limit.Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.** Indicates the analyte is a surrogate compound.This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with General Engineering Laboratories, LLC standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Cheryl Jones.slLw k Reviewed by 26 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: 9527-0001-OO F Prpiect: YANK01204 Sample ID: 146590001 Client ID: YANKOO 1 Matrix: TS Vol. Recv.: Collect Date: 20-SEP-05 Receive Date: 28-SEP-05 Collector Client Moisture: 13.6%Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 1.12 Americium-241 U -0.053 Bismuth-212 0.750 Bismuth-214 0.946 Cesium- 134 UUI 0.00 Cesium-137 0.519 Cobalt-60 U 0.0126 Europium-152 U -0.0189 Europium-154 U -0.00297 Europium-155 U 0.0476 Lead-212 1.05 Lead-214 1.16 Manganese-54 U 0.0246 Niobium-94 U 0.0102 Potassium-40 11.0 Radium-226 0.946 Silver-108m U -0.0139 Thallium-208 0.323+/-0.193+/-0.166+/-0.345+/-0.108+/-0.0391+/-0.0524+/-0.0229+1-0.0591+/-0.0691+/-0.0952+/-0.0788+/-0.109+/-0.0268+/-0.0208+/-0.888+/-0.108+/-0.0195+/-0.0531 0.0612 0.105 0.132 0.036 0.0242 0.0186 0.0194 0.0497 0.0554 0.0569 0.0305 0.035 0.0192 0.0174 0.168 0.036 0.0157 0.016+/-0.189+/-0.163+/-0.338+/-0.106+/-0.0383+/-0.0514+/-0.0224+/-0.0579+/-0.0678+/-0.0933+/-0.0772+/-0.107+/-0.0262+/-0.0204+/-0.870+/-0.106+/-0.0192+/-0.052 0.131 0.218 0.280 0.0757 0.0509 0.0394 0.0421 0.104 0.119 0.118 0.0634 0.0733 0.0408 0.0366 0.369 0.0757 0.0331 0.034 pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g MJHI 10/28/05 0916 467961 2 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 2 EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.27 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28,2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-OO1F 146590001 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.28 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001-002F 146590002 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 22%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01 204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 UU] 0.00 Americium-241 U 0.00512 Bismuth-212 U 0.568 Bismuth-214 0.840 Cesium-134 U -0.00964 Cesium-137 0.243 Cobalt-60 U 0.0243 Europium-152 U -0.0335 Europium-154 U -0.123 Europium-15S U -0.028 Lead-212 0.575 Lead-214 0.838 Manganese-54 U 0.00959 Niobium-94 U 0.010 Potassium-40 6.63 Radium-226 0.840 Silver-108m U -0.0132 Thallium-208 0.238+/-0.333+/-0.0542+/-0.433+/-0.169+/-0.0486+/-0.0769+/-0.0493+/-0.104+/-0.126+/-0.0895+/-0.108+/-0.155+/-0.0439+/-0.0375+/-1.13+/-0.169+/-0.0361+/-0.0731 0.199 0.0455 0.285 0.057 0.0392 0.0368 0.0375 0.0842 0.0928 0.072 0.0457 0.0615 0.0364 0.0316 0.319 0.057 0.0285 0.0341+/-0.326+/-0.0531+1-0.424+/-0.166+/-0.0476+/-0.0754+/-0.0484+/-0.102+/-0.123+/-0.0877+/-0.106+/-0.152+/-0.043+/-0.0368+/-1.1 1+1-0.166+/-0.0354+1-0.0717 0.414 0.0937 0.602 0.121 0.0833 0.0777 0.0813 0.176 0.203 0.149 0.095 0.129 0.0774 0.0668 0.701 0.121 0.060 0.072 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g MJHI 10/21/05 1912 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.29 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001 -002F 146590002 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.UT Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.30 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Tnjun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001-003F 146590003 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 21.9%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANKO0 204 YANKOO1 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.648 Americium-241 U 0.0315 Bismuth-212 0.392 Bismuth-214 1.08 Cesium-134 HUI 0.00 Cesium-137 0.883 Cobalt-60 U -0.00447 Europium-152 U -0.0847 Europium-154 U -0.00969 Europium-155 U 0.0147 Lead-212 0.641 Lead-214 1.26 Manganese-54 U 0.000602 Niobium-94 U 0.0301 Potassium-40 7.42 Radium-226 1.08 Silver-108m U -0.00766 Thallium-208 0.154+1-0.189+/-0.152+/-0.296+/-0.134+/-0.0292+/-0.0807+"-0.0283+1-0.0666+/-0.0926+/-0.0789+1-0.0755+/-0.124+/-0.0281+/-0.0361+/-0.860+/-0.134+/-0.0264+1-0.051 1 0.0626 0.118 0.167 0.0405 0.024 0.0207 0.022 0.0513 0.0625 0.0663 0.0353 0.0396 0.0232 0.0194 0.225 0.0405 0.0186 0.0219+/-0.185+/-0.149+/-0.290+/-0.132+/-0.0286+/-0.0791+/-0.0277+/-0.0652+/-0.0908+/-0.0774+/-0.074+/-0.122+/-0.0275+/-0.0354+/-0.842+/-0.132+/-0.0259+/-.0501 0.136 0.246 0.355 0.0856 0.0511 0.0441 0.0481 0.108 0.136 0.138 0.0734 0.0834 0.0494 0.0411 0.491 0.0856 0.0392 0.0464 pci/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g MJHI 10/21/05 1913 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.31 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-003F 146590003 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANKOOI Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.32 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001 -005F 146590004 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 12.4%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 1.09 Americium-241 U -0.0228 Bismuth-212 0.730 Bismuth-214 0.834 Cesium-134 UUI 0.00 Cesium-137 0.312 Cobalt-60 U 0.00445 Europium-152 U -0.0148 Europium-154 U -0.0476 Europium-155 U 0.0659 Lead-212 1.17 Lead-214 1.11 Manganese-54 U -0.00853 Niobium-94 U 0.00267 Potassium-40 11.5 Radium-226 0.834 Silver-108m U -0.00179 Thallium-208 0.378+/-0.204+/-0.0698+/-0.318+/-0.131+/-0.0287+/-0.050+/-0.0192+/-0.0627+/-0.0659+/-0.0673+/-0.119+/-0.138+/-0.0242+/-0.0197+/-1.04+/-0.131+/-0.019+/-0.0625 0.0493 0.0611 0.130 0.0328 0.0229 0.0173 0.016 0.0452 0.0501 0.0504 0.0265 0.0305 0.0192 0.0164 0.141 0.0328 0.0155 0.0158+/-0.200+/-0.0684+/-0.312+/-0.129+/-0.0281+/-0.049+/-0.0189+/-0.0614+/-0.0645+/-0.0659+/-0.116+/-0.135+/-0.0237+/-0.0193+/-1.02+/-0.129+/-0.0186+/-0.0612 0.106 0.126 0.274 0.0687 0.0478 0.0364 0.0346 0.094 0.107 0.104 0.0549 0.0636 0.0403 0.0343 0.308 0.0687 0.0323 0.0333 pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g MJH1 10/21/05 1913 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.33 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Report Date: October 28, 2005 Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-005F 146590004 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANKOO1 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.Ul Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.34 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Report Date: October 28,2005 Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001-008F 146590005 TS 20-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 12.2%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.740 Americium-241 U 0.00329 Bismuth-212 0.444 Bismuth-214 0.909 Cesium-134 U 0.0248 Cesium-137 0.416 Cobalt-60 U 0.0191 Europium-152 U -0.038 Europium-1 54 U -0.0432 Europium-15S U 0.0462 Lead-212 0.652 Lead-214 0.976 Manganese-54 U 0.0294 Niobium-94 U 0.0186 Potassium-40 12.1 Radium-226 0.909 Silver-108m U -0.00402 Thallium-208 0.235+/-0.197+1-0.113+1-0.317+/-0.138+/-0.0296+/-0.0689+1-0.0271+/-0.0647+/-0.0894+/-0.0689+1-0.0887+/-0.141+/-0.0284+/-0.0227+/-1.32+/-0.138+/-0.023+1-0.0517 0.0687 0.089 0.179 0.0381 0.026 0.0214 0.024 0.0521 0.0699 0.0598 0.0311 0.0356 0.0252 0.0201 0.204 0.0381 0.0186 0.0212+/-0.193+/-0.1 1 1+/-0.311+1-0.135+/-0.029+/-0.0675+/-0.0265+/-0.0634+/-0.0877+/-0.0675+/-0.087+/-0.138+/-0.0279+/-0.0223+/-1.30+/-0.135+/-0.0225+/-0.0507 0.149 0.184 0.379 0.0809 0.0553 0.0455 0.0525 0.110 0.152 0.124 0.0646 0.0751 0.0534 0.0426 0.453 0.0809 0.0392 0.0449 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g MJHI 10/23/05 1740 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.35 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-008F 146590005 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.36 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28,2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001 -009F 146590006 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 10.1%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 Americium-241 U 0.980 0.0379 Bismuth-212 Bismuth-214 Cesium-134 Cesium-137 Cobalt-60 Europium-152 Europium-154 Europium-155 Lead-212 Lead-214 Manganese-54 Niobium-94 Potassium-40 Radium-226 Silver-108m Thallium-208 0.992 1.14 U 0.0671 0.807 U 0.00604 U 0.150 U 0.00525 U -0.034 1.25 1.07 U -0.0215 U 0.0189 10.8 1.14 U -0.0154 0.370+/-0.282 0.0904+/-0.0581 0.0437+/-0.498 0.238+/-0.176 0.0512+1-0.064 0.0364+/-0.110 0.0294+/-0.0313 0.0262+/-0.158 0.0761+1-0.106 0.0874+/-0.0825 0.0666+1-0.164 0.0411+/-0.175 0.0548+/-0.037 0.0295+/-0.0311 0.0264+1-1.35 0.296+/-0.176 0.0512+1-0.0317 0.0253+/-0.0855 0.0307+1-0.276+1-0.057+1-0.488+/-0.172+/-0.0627+/-0.107+/-0.0306+1-0.155+/-0.104+/-0.0808+/-0.161+1-0.172+1-0.0363+/-0.0305+1-1.33+1-0.172+/-0.0311+/-0.0837 0.197 0.0897 0.507 0.109 0.0774 0.0627 0.0585 0.159 0.191 0.137 0.0855 0.115 0.0633 0.0563 0.653 0.109 0.0534 0.0649 pCilg pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g MJHI 10/23/05 1741 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.37 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-009F 146590006 Proiect: Client ID: Ity-I D7 , _, YANK01204 YANK001 VUI. IXLV..Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.38 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Report Date: October 28, 2005 Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001-01 OF 146590007 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 8.93%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANKOOI Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 1.32 Americium-241 U 0.126 Bismuth-212 0.813 Bismuth-214 0.924 Cesium-134 UUI 0.00 Cesium-137 0.331 Cobalt-60 U 0.025 Europium-152 U -0.0146 Europium-154 U 0.0234 Europium-155 U 0.0335 Lead-212 1.19 Lead-214 1.12 Manganese-54 U 0.0159 Niobium-94 U 0.0318 Potassium-40 11.6 Radium-226 0.924 Silver-108m U -0.00016 Thallium-208 0.396+1-0. 18 1+/-0.127+/-0.300+/-0.104+1-0.0389+1-0.0439+/-0.0538+/-0.0543+/-0.0619+/-0.0653+/-0.0799+/-0.0993+/-0.022+/-0.0426+/-0.814+/-0.104+/-0.0175+/-0.055 0.0515 0.103 0.122 0.0334 0.0228 0.0174 0.018 0.0465 0.0519 0.0588 0.0346 0.0327 0.0195 0.0158 0.140 0.0334 0.0149 0.0174+/-0.178+/-0.125+/-0.294+/-0.102+/-0.0381+/-0.0431+/-0.0527+/-0.0532+/-0.0606+/-0.064+/-0.0783+/-0.0973+/-0.0216+/-0.0417+/-0.798+/-0.102+/-0.0172+/-0.0539 0.111 0.212 0.260 0.0702 0.0478 0.0367 0.0389 0.097 0.112 0.121 0.0713 0.0683 0.041 0.0333 0.309 0.0702 0.0313 0.0366 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g MJH1 10/23/05 1741 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.39 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-OlOF 146590007 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.Ul Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.40 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001-OIOFS 146590008 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 11.1%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANKOOI Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 1.08 Americium-241 U 0.0553 Bismuth-212 0.620 Bismuth-214 0.851 Cesium-134 UUI 0.00 Cesium-137 0.697 Cobalt-60 U 0.000998 Europium-152 U 0.031 Europium-154 U 0.0307 Europium-155 UUI 0.00 Lead-212 1.13 Lead-214 1.10 Manganese-54 U 0.00703 Niobium-94 U 0.0183 Potassium-40 10.7 Radium-226 0.851 Silver-108m U 0.00316 Thallium-208 0.303+/-0.209+/-0.0748+/-0.261+/-0.136+/-0.0319+/-0.0879+/-0.0224+/-0.0722+1-0.0657+/-0.0837+/-0.118+/-0.131+/-0.0227+1-0.0193+/-0.993+/-0.136+/-0.0219+/-0.0572 0.0563 0.061 0.137 0.0324 0.022 0.0185 0.0182 0.0462 0.0555 0.0481 0.0272 0.031 0.0188 0.0168 0.131 0.0324 0.0157 0.0178+/-0.205+/-0.0733+/-0.256+/-0.133+/-0.0312+/-0.0861+/-0.022+/-0.0708+/-0.0644+/-0.082+/-0.115+/-0.129+/-0.0222+/-0.0189+/-0.973+/-0.133+/-0.0214+/-0.0561 0.120 0.126 0.289 0.0679 0.0462 0.0388 0.0391 0.0961 0.119 0.0995 0.0562 0.0648 0.0396 0.0352 0.290 0.0679 0.0329 0.0372 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCiig pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g MJH1 10/23/05 1742 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.41 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-O0OFS 146590008 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.42 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Report Date: October 28, 2005 Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector Moisture: 9527-0001-011IF 146590009 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-S5 Client 16.8%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSSGAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.699 Americium-241 U 0.0707 Bismuth-212 0.600 Bismuth-214 0.725 Cesium- 134 WUtI 0.00 Cesium-137 0.502 Cobalt-60 U-0.000163 Europium-152 U 0.0223 Europium-1 54 U -0.0153 Europium-155 U 0.063 Lead-212 0.772 Lead-214 0.809 Manganese-54 U -0.00576 Niobium-94 U -0.0152 Potassium-40 9.85 Radium-226 0.725 Silver-108m U 0.00303 Thallium-208 0.212+/-0.221+/-0.136+/-0.277+/-0.123+/-0.0647+/-0.0724+/-0.0285+1-0.0694+1-0.0739+/-0.0786+/-0.0811+/-0.111+/-0.0301+/-0.0261+/-1.08+/-0.123+/-0.0253+/-0.0543 0.0766 0.084 0.145 0.0366 0.030 0.0208 0.0233 0.0591 0.0588 0.0663 0.031 0.0417 0.0235 0.0199 0.170 0.0366 0.0211 0.0215+/-0.216+/-0.134+/-0.271+/-0.120+/-0.0634+/-0.0709+/-0.0279+/-0.068+/-0.0724+/-0.077+/-0.0795+/-0.109+/-0.0295+/-0.0256+/-t.05+/-0.120+/-0.0248+/-0.0532 0.168 0.175 0.319 0.079 0.0642 0.0449 0.0523 0.125 0.133 0.137 0.065 0.0879 0.051 0.0428 0.398 0.079 0.0447 0.0461 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g MJHI 10/23/05 1957 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09129/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.43 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-OI IF l146590009 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M H Analytical holding time exceeded.I Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.Ul Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.44 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001-012F 146590010 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 17.2%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.942 Americium-241 0.379 Bismuth-212 1.03 Bismuth-214 0.879 Cesium-134 U 0.00759 Cesium-137 1.48 Cobalt-60 U -0.00598 Europium-152 U 0.0669 Europium-154 U 0.0523 Europium-155 U 0.0596 Lead-212 0.874 Lead-214 1.24 Manganese-54 U -0.00525 Niobium-94 U 0.0125 Potassium-40 11.5 Radium-226 0.879 Silver-108m U 0.00773 Thallium-208 0.308+/-0.265+/-0.231+/-0.486+/-0.153+/-0.0341+/-0.151+/-0.0349+/-0.0874+/-0.0921+/-0.0877+/-0.124+/-0.193+/-0.0373+/-0.0281+/-1.54+/-0.153+/-0.0298+/-0.0707 0.0904 0.133 0.165 0.0462 0.0279 0.0271 0.0276 0.0726 0.0806 0.0761 0.039 0.0429 0.0254 0.0236 0.200 0.0462 0.0253 0.0236+/-0.260+/-0.226+/-0.476+1-0.150+/-0.0334+/-0.148+/-0.0342+/-0.0857+/-0.0903+/-0.086+/-0.121+/-0.189+/-0.0365+/-0.0276+/-1.51+1-0.150+/-0.0292+/-0.0693 0.197 0.278 0.360 0.0989 0.0605 0.0581 0.0616 0.153 0.178 0.158 0.0814 0.0911 0.0551 0.0507 0.462 0.0989 0.0534 0.0507 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pci/g MJHil 10/23/05 1957 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29105 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.45 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-012F 146590010 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.Ul Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.46 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: 9527-0001-013F Proiect: YANK01204 Sample ID: 146590011 Clent ID: YANK001 Matrix: TS Vol. Recv.: Collect Date: 19-SEP-05 Receive Date: 28-SEP-05 Collector: Client Moisture: 12.7%Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.829 Americium-241 U 0.092 Bismuth-212 0.658 Bismuth-214 0.834 Cesium-134 U 0.0583 Cesium-137 0.405 Cobalt-60 U -0.0163 Europium-152 U -0.023 Europium-154 1U 0.00557 Europium-155 U -0.00598 Lead-212 0.932 Lead-214 1.06 Manganese-54 U 0.0365 Niobium-94 U 0.0117 Potassium-40 12.0 Radium-226 0.834 Silver-108m U -0.00293 Thallium-208 0.277+/-0.226+1-0.101+/-0.411+/-0.124+/-0.0379+1-0.060+/-0.0235+/-0.066+/-0.0776+/-0.0727+/-0.109+/-0.154+/-0.0369+/-0.0238+1-1.31+/-0.124+/-0.022+/-0.0659 0.073 0.0893 0.149 0.0422 0.0276 0.0226 0.0172 0.055 0.0643 0.061 0.0339 0.0378 0.0201 0.0201 0.184 0.0422 0.0183 0.0223+/-0.222+/-0.0987+/-0.403+/-0.122+"-0.0372+/-0.0588+/-0.0231+/-0.0647+/-0.0761+/-0.0713+/-0.107+/-0.151+/-0.0361+/-0.0233+1-1.28+/-0.122+/-0.0216+/-0.0645 0.158 0.184 0.321 0.0893 0.0586 0.0482 0.0389 0.116 0.141 0.126 0.0705 0.0796 0.0434 0.0428 0.414 0.0893 0.0387 0.0472 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCilg pCi/g pCi/g MJH1 10/23/05 1957 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.47 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel corn Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-013F 146590011 Proiect: YANK01204 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv-: Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.Ul Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.48 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001-013FS 146590012 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 11.7%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM& ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.945 Americium-241 U 0.000425 Bismuth-212 0.664 Bismuth-214 0.819 Cesium-134 U 0.0556 Cesium-137 0.405 Cobalt-60 U 0.0031 Europium-152 U -0.0161 Europium-154 U -0.0508 Europium-155 U -0.0124 Lead-212 0.974 Lead-214 0.955 Manganese-54 U 0.020 Niobium-94 U -0.0155 Potassium-40 11.7 Radium-226 0.819 Silver-108m U 0.002 Thallium-208 0.350+/-0.227+/-0.0286+/-0.347+/-0.148+/-0.041+1-0.0703+/-0.0282+/-0.0622+/-0.0832+/-0.0528+/-0.124+/-0.148+/-0.0295+/-0.0238+/-1.27+/-0.148+/-0.0208+/-0.0645 0.0661 +/-0.222 0.0242 +/-0.028 0.172 +/-0.340 0.0347 +/-0.145 0.0288 +/-0.0401 0.0239 +/-0.0689 0.0231 +/-0.0276 0.0498 +/-0.0609 0.0626 +/-0.0815 0.0423 +/-0.0517 0.0286 +/-0.122 0.0365 +/-0.145 0.0251 +/-0.0289 0.0184 +/-0.0233 0.196 +/-1.25 0.0347 +1-0.145 0.0179 +/-0.0203 0.0184 +/-0.0632 0.144 0.050 0.367 0.0742 0.061 0.0507 0.0509 0.105 0.138 0.0876 0.0597 0.0768 0.0535 0.0393 0.439 0.0742 0.0379 0.0395 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g MJHI 10/23/05 1958 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.49 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28,2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-013FS 146590012 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANKOOI Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch a H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.50 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001-014F 146590013 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 7.62%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANKOOI Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.827 Americium-241 U -0.0635 Bismuth-212 0.772 Bismuth-214 0.666 Cesium-134 U 0.0176 Cesium-137 0.450 Cobalt-60 U 0.0161 Europium-152 U 0.0294 Europium-154 U 0.00452 Europium-155 U 0.0211 Lead-212 0.715 Lead-214 0.726 Manganese-54 U 0.00786 Niobium-94 U 0.0165 Potassium-40 9.64 Radium-226 0.666 Silver-108m U -0.00527 Thallium-208 0.236+/-0.216+1-0.105+/-0.323+/-0.114+/-0.0464+/-0.0605+/-0.0268+/-0.0616+/-0.0813+/-0.0684+/-0.0934+/-0.122+/-0.0258+/-0.022+/-1.18+/-0.114+/-0.0222+/-0.0558 0.0664 0.0798 0.150 0.0362 0.0241 0.0195 0.0235 0.0531 0.0674 0.0587 0.0336 0.036 0.0218 0.0194 0.209 0.0362 0.0179 0.0194+/-0.212+/-0.103+/-0.317+/-0.112+/-0.0455+/-0.0592+/-0.0263+/-0.0604+/-0.0797+/-0.0671+/-0.0915+/-0.120+/-0.0253+/-0.0216+/-1.16+/-0.112+/-0.0217+/-0.0546 0.144 0.165 0.321 0.077 0.0515 0.0418 0.0515 0.111 0.147 0.121 0.0697 0.0758 0.0466 0.0412 0.462 0.077 0.0378 0.0413 pCilg pci/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pci/g 110/9 pCilg pCilg pCilg pCilg pCi/g MJHI 10/23/05 2044 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.51 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-014F 146590013 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANKO1204 YANKOO 1 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M H Analytical holding time exceeded.1 Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.52 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector Moisture: 9527-0001-015F 146590014 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 12%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.956 Americium-241 U 0.0738 Bismuth-212 0.984 Bismuth-214 0.852 Cesium-134 UUI 0.00 Cesium-137 0.269 Cobalt-60 U 0.0119 Europium-152 U -0.0664 Europium-154 U 0.0237 Europium-155 U 0.0819 Lead-212 1.09 Lead-214 1.10 Manganese-54 U 0.00992 Niobium-94 U 0.0103 Potassium-40 11.1 Radium-226 0.852 Silver-108m U 0.0386 Thallium-208 0.357+/-0.223+/-0.0487+/-0.378+/-0.161+/-0.0629+/-0.0596+/-0.0289+/-0.0719+/-0.0858+/-0.0651+/-0.140+/-0.174+/-0.0303+/-0.0266+/-1.20+/-0.161+/-0.0266+/-0.0731 0.0865 0.0392 0.187 0.0489 0.0332 0.0237 0.0251 0.0576 0.073 0.0589 0.0409 0.0432 0.0263 0.0224 0.175 0.0489 0.0243 0.0261+/-0.219+/-0.0477+/-0.370+/-0.158+/-0.0616+/-0.0584+/-0.0284+/-0.0705+/-0.0841+/-0.0638+/-0.137+/-0.171+/-0.0297+/-0.026+/-1.17+/-0.158+/-0.0261+/-0.0717 0.186 0.0804 0.401 0.103 0.0704 0.0507 0.0553 0.121 0.160 0.121 0.0846 0.0907 0.0563 0.0478 0.401 0.103 0.0509 0.0553 pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g MJHIl 10/23/05 2044 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.53 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-01 5F 146590014 Proiect: YANK01204 Client ID: YANK00I Vol. Recv.: Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.Ul Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.54 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001-016F 146590015 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 12.6%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 1.05 Americium-241 U 0.0423 Bismuth-212 0.742 Bismuth-214 0.869 Cesium-134 U 0.0364 Cesium-137 0.595 Cobalt-60 U 0.0124 Europium-152 U 0.0145 Europium-154 U 0.0314 Europium-155 U 0.0821 Lead-212 1.22 Lead-214 1.12 Manganese-54 U 0.00844 Niobium-94 U 0.00756 Potassium-40 12.5 Radium-226 0.869 Silver-108m U 0.0237 Thallium-208 0.326+/-0.194+/-0.129+/-0.348+/-0.108+/-0.0334+/-0.0561+/-0.0218+1-0.0553+/-0.0603+/-0.101+/-0.0775+/-0.108+/-0.0218+/-0.0212+/-0.861+/-0.108+/-0.0241+/-0.0471 0.0586 0.108 0.130 0.0343 0.024 0.019 0.0186 0.0484 0.0513 0.0588 0.0286 0.0334 0.0188 0.0176 0.172 0.0343 0.0177 0.0179+/-0.190+/-0.127+/-0.341+/-0.106+/-0.0327+/-0.055+/-0.0214+/-0.0542+/-0.0591+/-0.099+/-0.076+/-0.106+/-0.0213+/-0.0208+/-0.844+/-0.106+/-0.0236+/-0.0461 0.125 0.222 0.276 0.0721 0.0503 0.0399 0.0402 0.101 0.111 0.122 0.0593 0.0698 0.0398 0.0369 0.373 0.0721 0.037 0.0377 pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCilg pcilg pci/g pCilg pci/g pCi/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g MJHI 10/23/05 2044 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.55 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -vwww.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-016F 146590015 Proiect: YANK01204 Client ID: YANK001 Vol. Recv.: Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch 1V H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.56 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001-017F 146590016 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 10.2%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK012O4 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 1.04 Americium-241 U -0.0516 Bismuth-212 0.935 Bismuth-214 0.782 Cesium-134 UUI 0.00 Cesium-137 0.419 Cobalt-60 U -0.00349 Europium-152 U -0.027 Europium-154 U -0.0517 Europium-155 U 0.0618 Lead-212 1.08 Lead-214 1.00 Manganese-54 U -0.00121 Niobium-94 U -0.00708 Potassium-40 11.4 Radium-226 0.782 Silver-108m U -0.00233 Thallium-208 0.370+/-0.213+1-0.0647. +/-0.298+/-0.123+/-0.0282+/-0.0611+1-0.0222+/-0.0587+/-0.0664+/-O.0819+/-0.112+1-0.123+1-0.0246+/-0.0181+1-1.00+1-0.123+/-0.0181+/-0.057 0.0591 0.0561 0.105 0.0303 0.0209 0.0178 0.015 0.0418 0.0505 0.0474 0.0255 0.0306 0.0172 0.0147 0.149 0.0303 0.0148 0.0156+/-0.209+/-0.0634+/-0.292+/-0.121+/-0.0276+1-0.0599+1-0.0217+1-0.0576+1-0.065+/-0.0802+I-0. I 10+1-0.120+1-0.0241+/-0.0178+1-0.983+/-0.121+1-0.0178+/-0.0559 0.125 0.116 0.223 0.0635 0.0438 0.0374 0.0325 0.0872 0.108 0.0978 0.0526 0.0636 0.0363 0.0309 0.322 0.0635 0.0309 0.0329 pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g MJH 110/23/05 2045 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.57 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Anallsis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-01 7F 146590016 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch 1ist H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.Ul Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.58 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28,2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector. Moisture: 9527-0001-018F 146590017 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 12%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.973 Americium-241 U 0.0116 Bismuth-212 0.766 Bismuth-214 0.853 Cesium-134 U 0.0307 Cesium-137 0.571 Cobalt-60 U -0.00169 Europium-1 52 U -0.059 Europium-154 U 0.0045 Europium-155 U 0.101 Lead-212 0.929 Lead-214 0.955 Manganese-54 U 0.00589 Niobium-94 U -0.0102 Potassium-40 10.2 Radium-226 0.853 Silver-108m U 0.0187 Thallium-208 0.320+/-0.215+/-0.104+/-0.390+/-0.137+/-0.052+/-0.0661+/-0.0287+/-0.0716+/-0.0904+/-0.0899+/-0.0911+/-0.125+/-0.0355+/-0.0253+/-1.14+/-0.137+/-0.025+/-0.061 0.0751 0.0902 0.184 0.044 0.0282 0.0202 0.0233 0.0564 0.0749 0.0614 0.0348 0.0423 0.0257 0.0203 0.215 0.044 0.0216 0.0237+/-0.210+/-0.102+/-0.382+/-0.134+/-0.051+/-0.0648+/-0.0281+/-0.0701+/-0.0886+/-0.0881+/-0.0892+/-0.122+/-0.0348+/-0.0248+/-1.12+/-0.134+/-0.0245+/-0.0598 0.164 0.187 0.395 0.0937 0.0606 0.0438 0.0521 0.119 0.165 0.128 0.0726 0.0891 0.0552 0.0435 0.484 0.0937 0.0457 0.0506 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pci/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g MJHI 10/24/05 2038 467961 1 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09129/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.59 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-01 SF 146590017 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.Ul Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.60 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001-004F 146590018 TS 19-SEP-O5 28-SEP-05 Client 13.2%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANKK01204 YANKOOl Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Americium-241 U -Curium-242 U Curium-243/244 U Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-238 U Plutonium-239/240 U Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-241 U Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSS Actinium-228 Americium-241 U Bismuth-212 Bismuth-214 Cesium-134 U Cesium-137 Cobalt-60 U Europium-152 U Europium-154 U Europium-155 U Lead-212 Lead-214 Manganese-54 U Niobium-94 U -C Potassium-40 Radium-226 Silver-108m U Thallium-208 Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting-0.0834 0.0139 0.0641 0.0419 0.0418+/-0.0893+/-0.0552+/-0.133 0.133 0.043 0.116+/-0.090+/-0.0553+/-0.133 0.331 0.158 0.296 0.364 0.217 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g+/-0.154 0.151 +/-0.154+/-0.0947 0.0778 +/-0.0949-2.5 +/-7.59 6.47 +/-7.60 13.5 pCi/g 0.763).00782 0.600 0.594 0.0432 0.440 0.010 0.053-0.0316 0.0238 0.625 0.605-0.011).00686 10.7 0.594).00608 0.275+/-0.252+/-0.0407+/-0.573+/-0.140+/-0.0899+/-0.093+/-0.0312+/-0.0709+/-0.117+/-0.0654+/-0.0941+/-0.148+/-0.0346+/-0.028+/-1.33+l-0.140+/-0.0274+/-0.0813 0.095 0.0339 0.208 0.0451 0.031 0.0269 0.0274 0.0617 0.0897 0.0536 0.0325 0.0434 0.0276 0.0229 0.267 0.0451 0.0226 0.0268+/-0.247+/-0.0399+/-0.562+/-0.137+/-0.0881+/-0.0911+/-0.0306+/-0.0695+l-0.115+/-0.0641+/-0.0922+/-0.145+/-0.0339+/-0.0274+/-1.30+1-0.137+/-0.0268+/-0.0797 0.208 0.0704 0.450 0.0974 0.0672 0.0581 0.0616 0.131 0.198 0.112 0.0683 0.0922 0.0601 0.0497 0.604 0.0974 0.0482 0.0576 0.0225 1.47 pCi/g pCilg pci/g pci/g pci/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pcilg pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g HOBI 10/15/05 1042 471786 1 HOBI 10/15105 1042 471787 2 HOBI 10/21/05 0037 471788 3 MJHI 10/24/05 2039 467961 4 EXWI 10/18/05 2227 472639 5 BXFI 10/10/05 0243 467508 6 GFPC, Sr90, solid -0.025 pCi/g Strontium-90 U 0.0205 Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid -I to 2 pCi/g Tritium U 0.586 Liquid Scint C14, Solid AII,FSS+/-0.0138 0.0108 +/-0.0139+/-0.869 0.703 +/-0.869 61 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-004F 146590018 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis Liquid Scint C)4, Solid A1,FSS Carbon-14 U 0.115 Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Iron-55 U 27.6 Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Nickel-63 U 0.667 Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Technetium-99 U 0.237+/-0.0778 0.0632 +/-0.0778 0.129+/-49.4 33.3 +/-49.4 69.0+/-5.60 4.68 +/-5.60 9.67 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g SLNI 10/12/05 0801 470741 7 BXFI 10t20/05 1218 473150 8 BXFI 10/14/OS 0340 470704 10 BXFI 10/08/05 1541 468332 11+/-0.152 0.122 +/-0.152 0.250 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Ash Soil Prep Ash Soil Prep, GL-RAD-A-021B PD 09/30/05 0554 467615 Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified 2 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-i I-RC Modified 3 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-I I-RC Modified 4 EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 5 EPA 905.0 Modified 6 EPA 906.0 Modified 7 EPA EERF C-01 Modified 8 DOE RESL Fe-], Modified 9 DOE RESL Fe-I, Modified 10 DOE RESL Ni-i, Modified II DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Americium-243 Plutonium-242 Carrier/Tracer Recovery Carrier/Tracer Recovery Carrier/Tracer Recovery Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FE GFPC, Sr90, solid -0.025 pCi/g Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FS 84 104 95 45 73 (15%/-125%) (15%1w-125%) (25%-~1 2 5%)(25%- 1 25%)(15%-1~ 25%)62 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Report Date: October 28, 2005 Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-004F 146590018 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Carrier/Tracer Recovery Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FS Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FS 91 89 (25°/125%) (15%/6-125%) Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.Ul Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.63 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: Report Date: October 28, 2005 9527-0001-006F 146590019 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-S5 Client 12.8%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Alpha Spec Analysis AlphaspecAm241, Cm, SolidALL FSS Americium-241 U Curium-242 U -{Curium-243/244 U -Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-238 U -Plutonium-239/240 U -0.0513-.00557-0.0689+/-0.0919+l-0.062+/-0.102 0.0635 0.071 0.139+/-0.0921+/-0.062+l-0.103-0.0449 +/-0.113 0.135 +/-0.113-0.0175 +/-0.045 0.0613 +/-0.0451 Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-241 U -1.47 Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSSGAM& ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.805 Americium-241 U 0.0609 Bismuth-212 0.507 Bismuth-214 0.545 Cesium-134 U 0.0144 Cesium-137 0.555 Cobalt-60 U 0.0208 Europium-152 U 0.0152 Europium-154 U -0.0528 Europium-155 U 0.026 Lead-212 0.702 Lead-214 0.699 Manganese-54 U -0.00571 Niobium-94 U -0.00238 Potassium-40 8.96 Radium-226 0.545 Silver-108m U -0.00399 Thallium-208 0.230 Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC, Sr90, solid -0.025 pCilg Strontium-90 U -0.0188 Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid -Ito 2 pCi/g Tritium U 0.913 Liquid Scint C14, Solid All.FSS+/-7.22 6.12 +/1-7.23+/-0.176+/-0.0892+/-0.306+/-0.108+/-0.0224+/-0.0784+/-0.0207+/-0.058+/-0.0621+/-0.0576+1-0.0875+/-0.114+1-0.0203+/-0.0193+/-0.973+/-0.108+/-0.0188+/-0.0523 0.0502 0.0553 0.124 0.0348 0.019 0.0154 0.0184 0.0429 0.0458 0.0493 0.026 0.031 0.016 0.0157 0.156 0.0348 0.015 0.0159+/-0.172+/-0.0874+/-0.300+/-0.106+/-0.0219+/-0.0768+/-0.0202+/-0.0568+/-0.0609+/-0.0565+/-0.0858+/-0.112+/-0.0199+/-0.0189+/-0.953+/-0.106+/-0.0184+/-0.0512 0.194 0.217 0.346 0.322 0.174 12.7 0.108 0.115 0.264 0.0729 0.0404 0.0326 0.0397 0.0898 0.0994 0.102 0.054 0.0649 0.0341 0.0332 0.341 0.0729 0.0315 0.0337 0.0241 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCilg PCi/g pCi/g pCi/g PCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g HOBI 10/15(05 1042 471786 1 HOBI 10115105 1042 471787 2 HOBI 10/21/05 0054 471788 3 MJH1 10/24/05 2039 467961 4 EXW1 10/18/05 2227 472639 5+/-0.013 0.0116 +/-0.013+/-0.882 0.700 +/-0.882 1.46 pCi/g BXFI 10/10/05 0316 467508 6 64 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-006F 146590019 Proiect: YANK01204 Client ID: YANKO0 I Vol. Recv.: Parameter Qualifier Result Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis Liquid Scint C14, SolidAllFSS Carbon-14 U 0.103 Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSS Iron-55 U 12.9 Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Nickel-63 U -4.85 Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Technetium-99 U 0.200 Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M+/-0.0755 0.0615 +/-0.0755 0.125+1-47.8 32.3 +/-47.8 66.9+1-6.05 5.24 +/-6.05 10.8+/-0.142 0.114 +/-0.142 0.234 pci/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g SLNI 10/12/05 1101 470741 7 BXFI 10/20/05 1235 473150 8 BXFI 10/14/05 0412 470704 10 BXFI 10/08/05 1613 468332 11 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Ash Soil Prep Ash Soil Prep, GL-RAD-A-021B PD 09/30/05 0554 467615 Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified 2 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-I l-RC Modified 3 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-I ]-RC Modified 4 EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 5 EPA 905.0 Modified 6 EPA 906.0 Modified 7 EPA EERF C-01 Modified 8 DOE RESL Fe-I, Modified 9 DOE RESL Fe-I, Modified 10 DOE RESL Ni-I, Modified 11 DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Americium-243 Plutonium-242 Carrier/Tracer Recovery Carrier/Tracer Recovery Carrier/Tracer Recovery Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FE GFPC, Sr90, solid -0.025 pCilg Liquid Scint FeS5, Solid-ALL FS 84 101 104 48 83 (150/o1425%) (15%-125%/o) (25%-1 25%)(250/%- 1 25%)(I5%/e- 125%)65 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-006F 146590019 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Carrier/Tracer Recovery Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FS Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FS 86 91 (25%-- 125%)(15%-1I 25%)Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicdtes an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.66 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28,2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: Matrix: Collect Date: Receive Date: Collector: Moisture: 9527-0001-007F 146590020 TS 19-SEP-05 28-SEP-05 Client 18%Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time BatchM Rad Alpha Spec Analysis Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Americium-241 U 0.061 Curium-242 U -0.014 Curium-243/244 U -0.00523 Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-238 U 0.0554 Plutonium-239/240 U 0.0619 Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSS Plutonium-241 U -4.02 Rad Gamma Spec Analysis Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM& ALL FSS Actinium-228 0.378 Americium-241 U 0.030 Bismuth-212 0.309 Bismuth-214 0.465 Cesium-134 U 0.0076 Cesium-137 0.563 Cobalt-60 U -0.00959 Europium-152 U -0.0151 Europium-154 U -0.0371 Europium-155 U 0.0461 Lead-212 0.436 Lead-214 0.581 Manganese-54 U 0.0144 Niobium-94 U 0.00156 Potassium-40 5.13 Radium-226 0.465 Silver-108m U -0.0134 Thallium-208 0.165 Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting GFPC, Sr90, solid -0.025 pCilg Strontium-90 U -0.00103 Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid -I to 2 pCi/g Tritium U 0.333 Liquid Scint C14, Solid AllFSS+1-0.0782+1-0.0604+/-0.0581 0.00 0.047 0.0666+1-0.0786+1-0.0604+/-0.0581+/-0.122 0.109 +1-0.122+/-0.082 0.0464 +/-0.0823+1-7.86 6.76 +1-7.87+1-0.141+1-0.109+1-0.245+/-0.0767+1-0.0178+/-0.0489+/-0.0181+1-0.047+/-0.0568+/-0.0542+/-0.0532+1-0.0825+1-0.0188+/-0.0165+1-0.647+1-0.0767+1-0.015+1-0.0446+1-0.0125 0.049 0.085 0.107 0.0285 0.0156 0.0152 0.0135 0.0401 0.0426 0.0498 0.0241 0.0275 0.0168 0.0135 0.129 0.0285 0.0119 0.0139+1-0.139+/-0.107+1-0.240+/-0.0752+1-0.0174+/-0.0479+/-0.0177+/-0.0461+/-0.0556+1-0.0531+1-0.0521+/-0.0808+/-0.0184+1-0.0162+/-0.634+1-0.0752+1-0.0147+1-0.0437 0.0707 0.173 0.204 0.273 0.148 14.1 0.106 0.177 0.229 0.0603 0.0335 0.0324 0.0299 0.0842 0.0928 0.103 0.0503 0.0579 0.0356 0.0287 0.286 0.0603 0.0254 0.0297 0.0221 1.48 pCilg pcilg pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pcilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pci/g pci/g pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g HOBI 10115105 1042 471786 1 HOBI 10/15/05 1042 471787 2 HOBI 10/21/05 0111 471788 3 MJHI 10/24/05 2044 467961 4 EXWI 10/18/05 2228 472639 5 BXFI 10/10/05 0348 467508 6 0.0106 +1-0.0125+1-0.860 0.707 +1-0.860 67 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Project: Soils PO# 002332 Report Date: October 28, 2005 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001-007F 146590020 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANKOOI Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Rad Liquid Scintillation Analysis Liquid Scint C14, Solid AllFSS Carbon-14 0.136 Liquid Scint FeS5, Solid-ALL FSS Iron-55 U 6.73 Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSS Nickel-63 U -4.77 Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSS Technetium-99 U 0.107+/-0.0779 0.063 +/-0.078 0.128+/-41.5 28.0 +/-41.5 57.9+1-5.39 4.68 +/-5.39 9.66 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g SLNI 10/12/05 1235 470741 7 BXFI 10/20/05 1252 473150 8 BXFI 10/14/05 0444 470704 10 BXFI 10/08/05 1645 468332 11+1-0.144 0.119 +/-0.144 0.243 The following Prep Methods were performed Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Ash Soil Prep Ash Soil Prep, GL-RAD-A-021B PD 09/30/05 0554 467615 Dry Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 AXP2 09/29/05 1619 467614 The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description I DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC Modified 2 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-I I-RC Modified 3 DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-I I-RC Modified 4 EML HASL 300,4.5.2.3 5 EPA 905.0 Modified 6 EPA 906.0 Modified 7 EPA EERF C-01 Modified 8 DOE RESL Fe-I, Modified 9 DOE RESL Fe-I, Modified 10 DOE RESL Ni-1, Modified 11 DOE EML HASL-300, Tc-02-RC Modified Surrogate/Tracer recovery Test Recovery% Acceptable Limits Americium-243 Plutonium-242 Carrier/Tracer Recovery Carrier/Tracer Recovery Carrier/Tracer Recovery Alphaspec Am24 1, Cm, Solid ALL Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSS Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL F'GFPC, Sr90, solid -0.025 pCi/g Liquid Scint FeS5, Solid-ALL FS 83 103 89 44 91 (I S°/O-125%) (15%-125%) (25% -125%)(25%- 125%)(15%°-125%) -68 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -vwww.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Company: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Address: Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Report Date: October 28, 2005 Project: Soils PO# 002332 Client Sample ID: Sample ID: 9527-0001 -007F 146590020 Proiect: Client ID: Vol. Recv.: YANK01204 YANK001 Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty LC TPU MDA Units DF AnalystDate Time Batch M Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FS 91 (25%-125%) Carrier/Tracer Recovery Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FS 90 (15%-125%) Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.69 I-Ii QUALITY CONTROL DATA'I 70 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Client: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Haddam Neck Plant 362 Injun Hollow Road East Hampton, Connecticut Contact: Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Renort Date: October 28,2005 Page 1 of 9 Workorder: 146590 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Alpha Spec Batch 471786 QC1200957640 Americium-241 146590018 DUP Curium-242 Curium-243/244 U -0.0834 Uncert: +1-0.0893 TPU: +/-0.090 U 0.0139 Uncert: +/-0.0552 TPU: +/-0.0553 U 0.0641 Uncert: +/-0.133 TPU: +/-0.133 QC1200957642 Americium-241 LCS Curium-242 Curium-243/244 8.88 Uncert: TPU: Uncert: TPU: 10.8 Uncert: TPU: U 0.0189+/-0.131+/-0.131 U 0.0191+/-0.076+/-0.076 U -0.0933+/-0.0893+/-0.0902 8.08+/-0.761+/-1.32 U 0.0052+/-0.0394+/-0.0394 10.1+1-0.849+/-1.59 U 0.0167+/-0.0832+1-0.0832 U -0.00623+1-0.0523+/-0.0524 U 0.075+/-0.142+/-0.143 pCi/g N/A pCi/g 32 pCi/g N/A (0/o 100%) HOB I (0% -I00 0 h)(0%- 100%/)pCi/g 91 (75%4125%) 10/15/05 10:42 10/15/05 10:42 pCi/g pCi/g 94 (750/. 125%)QC1200957639 Americium-241 MB PCi/g 10/15/05 10:42 Uncert: TPU: Curium-242 Uncert: TPU: pCi/g pCi/g Curium-243/244 Uncert: TPU: QC1200957641 Americium-241 146590018 MS 9.05 Uncert: TPU Curium-242 Curium-243/244 Uncert: TPU 11.1 Uncert: TPU U -0.0834+/-0.0893+/-0.090 U 0.0139+/-0.0552+/-0.0553 U 0.0641+/-0.133+/-0.133 U 8.56+/-0.866+/-1.37-0.0112+/-0.0579+/-0.0579 9.81+/-0.930+/-1.53 pCi/g pci/g pci/g 95 (75%/6-125%) 88 (75%-125%) Batch 471787 QC1200957644 146590018 DUP Plutonium-238 U 0.0419 U 0.0496 pCi/g 17 (0% -1000/.) HOBI 10/15/05 10:42 71 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 146590 Page 2 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range AnIst Date Time Rad Alpha Spec Batch 471787 Plutonium-239/240 QC1200957646 LCS Plutonium-238 Plutonium-239/240 QC1200957643 MB Plutonium-238 Plutonium-239/240 QC1200957645 146590018 MS Plutonium-238 Plutonium-239/240 Uncert: +1-0.154 TPU: +/-0.154 U 0.0418 Uncert: +/-0.0947 TPU: +/-0.0949 Uncert: TPU: 8.20 Uncert: TPU: Uncert: TPU: Uncert: TPU: U+/-0.113+/-0.113 0.0317+/-0.0728+/-0.0729 pCi/g 28 (0% -100%)U 0.0393+/-0.118+/-0.118 8.95+/-0.825+/-1.32 U -0.0405+/-0.0659+/-0.066 U 0.00545+/-0.0413+/-0.0413 pCi/g (75%-125%) 10/15/05 10:42 pCi/g 109 (75%o-125%) pci/g 10/15/05 10:42 pci/g U 0.0419 Uncert: +/-0.154 TPU: +1-0.154 8.36 U 0.0418 Uncert: +/-0.0947 TPU: +/-0.0949 U-0.175+/-0.0785+/-0.0808 6.95+/-0.702+/-1.04 pci/g (75%-125%) pCi/g 83 (750o/-125%) Batch 471788 QC1200957648 Plutonium-241 146590018 DUP U -2.5 Uncert: +/-7.59 TPU: +/-7.60 U-2.06+/-8.17+/-8.17 pCi/g N/A (0% -100%) HOBI QC1200957650 LCS Plutonium-241 QC1200957647 MB Plutonium-241 QC1200957649 146590018 MS Plutonium-241 120 Uncert: TPU: 108+/-11.8+/-16.2 pci/g 90 (75%-125%) 10/21/05 01:45 10/21/05 02:19 10/21/05 01:28 10/21/05 02:02 Uncert: TPU: U -4.72+/-7.05+/-7.07 pCi/g 123 U Uncert: TPU:-2.5+/-7.59+1-7.60 102+/-1 1.0+/- 15.0 pci/g 83 (75%-125%) Rad Gamma Spec Batch 467961 QC1200948603 146590001 DUP Actinium-228 1.12 Uncert: +/-0.193 0.964+/-0.191+/-0.187 pCi/g 15 (0% -100%) MJHI 10/25/05 07:02 72 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com OC Summary Workorder: 146590 Page 3 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst Date Time Rad Gamma Spec Batch 467961 Americium-241 Bismuth-2 12 Bismuth-214 Cesiwn-134 Cesium- 137 Cobalt-60 Europium-152 Europium-154 TPU: +/-0.189 u -0.053 U -0.0394 Uncert: +/-0.166 +/-0.0597 TPU: +/-0.163 +/-0.0585 0.750 0.786 Uncert: +/-0.345 +/-0.285 TPU: +/-0.338 +1-0.279 0.946 0.838 Uncert: +/-0.108 +1-0.126 TPU: +/-0.106 +1-0.124 UIJu 0.00 UUI 0.00 Uncert: +/-0.0391 +1-0.034 TPU: +/-0.0383 +/-0.0333 0.519 0.546 Uncert: +/-0.0524 +/-0.0725 TPU: +/-0.0514 +/-0.0711 U 0.0126 U 0.00654 Uncert: +1-0.0229 +/-0.0175 TPU: +/-0.0224 +/-0.0171 U -0.0189 U 0.0189 Uncert: +/-0.0591 +/-0.0427 TPU: +/-0.0579 +/-0.0418 U -0.00297 U 0.0224 Uncert: +/-0.0691 +/-0.0854 TPU: +/-0.0678 +/-0.0837 U 0.0476 U 0.0354 Uncert: +1-0.0952 +/-0.0522 TPU: +/-0.0933 +/-0.0511 1.05 0.964 Uncert: +/-0.0788 +1-0.100 TPU: +/-0.0772 +/-0.0982 1.16 1.05 Uncert: +/-0.109 +/-0.132 TPU: +/-0.107 +/-0.129 U 0.0246 U -0.0188 Uncert: +/-0.0268 +/-0.0199 TPU: +/-0.0262 +/-0.0195 U 0.0102 U 0.0106 Uncert: +/-0.0208 +/-0.0166 TPU: +/-0.0204 +/-0.0162 11.0 10.7 Uncert: +/-0.888 +/-0.915 TPU: +/-0.870 +/-0.897 0.946 0.838 Uncert +/-0.108 +/-0.126 TPU: +/-0.106 +/-0.124 U -0.0139 U -0.00636 Uncert: +/-0.0195 +/-0.0157 pCi/g N/A pCi/g 5 pCi/g 12 pCilg 55 pCi/g 5 pCi/g 63 pCi/g N/A pCi/g N/A pCi/g 29 pCi/g 8 pci/g 10 pCi/g N/A pCitg 4 pCitg 2 pCitg 12 pCi/g N/A (0%- 100%)(0% -1000/%)(0%- 100%)(0%/ -100%)(0%- 100%/e)(0%- 100%)(0% -1000/c)(0%- 100%)(00/%- 1000/.)(00/. -20%)(0%/c -20%/c)(0%- 100%)(0% -1000/0)(0%/o -20%)(00/%- 1000/c)(0% -1000/%)Europium-155 Lead-212 Lead-214 Manganese-54 Niobium-94 Potassium-40 Radiun-226 Silver-108m 73 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 146590 Page 4 of 9 Yarmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC°/. Range Anist Date Time Rad Gamma Spec Batch 467961 Tballium-208 TPU: +1-0.0192 0.323 Uncert: +/-0.0531 TPU: +/-0.052+/-0.0154 0.277+/4.0473+/-0.0464 pCi/g 15 (0%- 100%)QC1200948604 Actinium-228 Anericium-241 LCS Uncert: TPU: 24.4 Uncert: TPU: Bismuth-212 Uncert TPU: Bismuth-214 Uncert: TPU: Cesium-134 Cesium-1 37 Uncert: TPU: 9.39 Uncert: TPU: 14.2 Uncert: TPU: Cobalt-60 Europium-152 U -0.0977+J-0.779+t-0.763 24.7+/-1.12+/-1.10 U -0.813+1-1.51+/-1.48 U 0.0847+/-0.334+/-0.328 U -0.0724+/-0.223+/-0.218 10.2+14.651+/4.638 14.9+1-0.878+/4.861 U -0.0803+/-0.410+/4.402 U 4.165+14.465+/4.456 U -0.0932+1-0.446+/-OA37 U 0.250+/4.219+/4.215 U 0.0478+1-0.304+t-0.298 U 0.107+/-0.198+1-0.194 U 4.0767+1-0.196+/-0.192 U 4.989 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g 10/21/05 18:05 pCi/g pCi/g 109 (75%-12S%) 105 (75%/-125%) pci/g 101 (75%-125%) Uncert: TPU: Europium-154 Uncert: TPU: Europium-155 Uncert: TPU: Lead-212 Uncert: TPU: pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCilg Lead-214 Uncert: TPU: Manganese-54 Uncert: TPU: Niobium-94 Uncert: TPU: Potassium40 74 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 146590 Page 5 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst Date Time Rad Gamma Spec Batch 467961 Uncert: TPU: Radium-226 Uncert TPU: Silver-108m Uncert: TPU: Thallium-208 Uncert: TPU: QC1200948602 MB Actinium-228 Uncert: TPU: Americium-241 Uncert: TPU: Bismuth-212 Uncert: TPU: Bismuth-214 Uncert: TPU:+/-1.49+/-1.46 U 0.0847+/-0.334+/-0.328 U 0.0266+/-0.157+/-0.154 U 0.000906+/-0.192+/-0.188 U 0.0201+/-0.102+/-0.100 U 0.0105+/-0.0736+1-0.0722 U 0.00349+1-0.0959+/-0.094 U 0.031+/-0.0279+/-0.0273 U 0.00892+/-0.0123+/-0.012 U 0.000391+/-0.0128+/-0.0126 U -0.00275+/-0.013+/-0.0127 U 0.0114+/-0.0342+/-0.0335 U 0.0161+1-0.0328+1-0.0322 U 0.00413+/-0.0343+/-0.0336 U 0.0138+1-0.030+/-0.0294 UUI 0.00+/-0.059+/-0.0578 Cesium-134 pCi/g pCi/g 10/25/05 07:01 pci/g pCi/g (75%-1250/a) Uncert: TPU: Cesium-137 Uncert: TPU: Cobalt-60 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Uncert: TPU: Europium-152 Uncert: TPU: Europium-154 Uncert: TPU: Europium-155 Uncert: TPU: Lead-212 Uncert TPU: Lead-214 Uncert: TPU: 75 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 146590 Page 6 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC/. Range Anist Date llme Rad Gamma Spec Batch 467961 Manganese-54 Uncert: TPU: Niobium-94 Uncert: TPU: Potassium-40 Uncert: TPU: U 0.00689+/-0.0123+1-0.0121 U 0.00302+/-0.0117+/-0.0114 U 0.0254+/-0.130+/-0.127 U 0.031+/-0.0279+/-0.0273 UUI 0.00+/-0.0249+/-0.0244 U 0.022+/-0.0129+/-0.0126 pCi/g pCilg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Radium-226 Uncert: TPU: Silver-108m Uncert: TPU: Thallium-208 Uncert: TPU: Rad Gas Flow Batch 472639 QC1200959676 146590019 DUP Strontium-90 QC1200959678 LCS Strontium-90 QC120095s675 MB Strontium-90 QC1200959677 146590019 MS Strontium-90 U -0.0188 Uncert: +/-0.013 TPU: +/-0.013 1.30 Uncert: TPU: Uncert: TPU: U -0.00423+/-0.00989 +/-0.00989 1.26+/-0.0792+t-0.0875 U 0.000421+1-0.00651 +/-0.00651 2.22+/-0.214+/-0.224 pCi/g N/A (0% -1000/.) 3XWI pci/g 97 (75%-125%) 10/18/05 23:07 10/19/05 10:56 10/18/05 22:28 10/19/05 10:56 pCi/g 2.70 U -0.0188 Uncert: +/-0.013 TPU: +/-0.013 pCi/g 82 (75/o-1250/%) Rad Liquid Scintillation Batch 467508 QC1200947552 145495003 DUP Tritium QC1200947554 LCS Tritium QC1200947551 MB Tritium U 3.73 Uncert: +/-6.27 TPU: +/-6.27 U 5A8+/-5.58+/-5.58 pCi/g 0 (0%- 100%/.) BXF1 10/10/05 04:53 10/13/05 02:10 3.03 Uncert: TPU: 2.43+/-0.368+/-0.370 pCi/g 80 (75%-125%/o) U 0.341 pCi/g 10/1105 04:21 76 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 146590 Page 7 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Liquid Scintillation Batch 467508 Uncert: TPU:+1-0.435+/-0.435 QC1200947553 145495003 MS Tritium 67.2 U Uncert: TPU: 3.73+1-6.27+1-6.27 50.9+1-9.06+1-9.10 pCi/g 76 (75'-125%) 10/13/05 01:38 Batch 468332 QC1200949448 Technetium-99 146692033 DUP U 0.0779 Uncert +/-0.163 TPU: +/-0.163 U 0.116+/-0.153+/-0.153 pCilg 0 (0% -100%h) BXFI QC1200949450 LCS Technetium-99 QC1200949447 MB Technetium-99 QC1200949449 146692033 MS Technetium-99 13.1 Uncert: TPU: 12.6+/-0.382+/-0A78 pCi/g 96 (75%/o-125%) 10/08/05 21.04 10108/05 22:09 10/08/05 20:32 10/08/05 21:36 Uncert: TPU: U 0.126+/-0.159+/-0.159 pCi/g 12.9 U Uncert TPU: 0.0779+/-0.163+/-0.163 11.5+/-0.327+/-0.418 pCi/g 89 (750-125%/.) Batch 470704 QC1200954980 146692033 DUP Nickel-63 QC1200954982 LCS Nickel-63 QC1200954979 MB Nickel-63 QC1200954981 146692033 MS Nickel-63 U -5.55 Uncert +1-6.92 TPU: +1-6.93 U -5.8+1-6.42+1-6.42 pCi/g N/A (00% -100%/e) BXF1 490 Uncert: TPU: 451+/-15.5+/-21.1 pCi/g 92 (75%-125°/.) 10/14/05 06:54 10114/05 07:58 10/14/05 06:21 10/14/05 07:26 Uncert: TPU: U -4.7+/-5.32+/-5.32 pCi/g 575 U Uncert: TPU:-5.55+1-6.92+1-6.93 515+/-20.2+/-26.9 pCi/g 90 (75O/,125%) Batch 470741 QC1200955097 146692033 DUP Carbon-14 QC1200955099 LCS Carbon-14 U 0.0819 Uncert: +/-0.0775 TPU: +/-0.0776 U 0.00819+/-0.0747+/-0.0747 pCi/g 0 (0h -I 009h/) SLN I 10/12/05 18:55 10/12/05 20:44 6.94 Uncert TPU: 6.93+/-0.388+/-0.403 pCi/g 100 (75%-125%) 77 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com OC Summary Workorder: 146590 Page 8 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anist Date Time Rad Liquid Sdntlation Batch 470741 QC1200955096 MD Carbon-14 Uncert: TPU: U 0.0653+/-0.0756+1/0.0756 pCi/g 10/12/05 17:18 QC1200955098 146692033 MS Carbon-14 6.95 U Uncert: TPU: 0.0819+1-0.0775+1-0.0776 6.72+/-0.381+/-0.395 pCi/g 97 (75%-125%) 10/12/05 20:27 Batch 473150 QC1200960975 146692033 DUP Iron-55 QC1200960977 LCS Iron-55 U 4.18 Uncert: +1-51.5 TPU: +1-51.5 U-2.57+/-44.0+/-44.0 pCi/g N/A (0% -100%) BXFI 10/20/05 14:00 10/20105 14:34 641 Uncert: TPU: 609+/-63.9+/-76.0 pCi/g 95 (75%-125%) QC1200960974 MB Iron-55 Uncert: TPU: U 20.1+1-39.2+/-39.3 pCi/g 10120/05 13:43 QC1200960976 146692033 MS Iron-55 750 U Uncert: TPU: 4.18+1-51.5+1-51.5 733+/-70.1+/-85.9 pCi/g 98 (750-125%) 10/20/05 14:17 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows: B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.H Analytical holding time exceeded.J Indicates an estimated value.U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.Ul Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy. X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.78 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 -(843) 556-8171 -www.gel.com QC Summary Workorder: 146590 Page 9 of 9 Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range AnIst Date Time N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.** Indicates analyte is a surrogate compound.^ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptence criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/- the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations. Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.79 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2b Sample and Scan Area Data (9 Pages) Survey Release Record Scan Area Results Survey Unit 9527-0001 Sample Name 9527-01-SL-00-01-0 9527-01-SL-00-02-0 9527-01-SL-00-03-0 9527-01-SL-00-04-0 9527-01 -SL-00-05-0 9527-01-SL-00-06-0 9527-01-SL-00-07-0 9527-01 1-00-08-0 Background (cDM)7660 7400 9180 8140 11400 10700 8270 8600 Action Level (cvm)8909 8628 10547 9428 12924 12176 9568 9923 Results Above Lon Date Loc Time E600 SIN Probe SIN LcAmr1 8870 7670 8940 7930 10400 9120 8420 8200 AL 9/20/2005 9119/2005 9/19/2005 9/19/2005 9/19/2005 9/19/2005 9/19/2005 9/20t2005 10:08 AM 8:35 AM 8:21 AM 2:09 PM 2:05 PM 8:49 AM 9:03 AM 10:01 AM 1107 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1107 1010 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1010 9527-01-SL-00-09-0 9527-01-SL-00-10-0 9527-01-SL-00-11-0 9527-01-6L-00-12-0 9527-01-SL-00-13-0 9527-01-SL-00-14-0 9527-01-6-0-15-0 9527-01-SL-00-16-0 9527-01-SL-00-17-0 9527-01-SL-00-18-0 10900 10300 9550 10700 12300 11900 13100 8670 7990 9800 12390 11748 10945 12176 13883 13457 14733 9999 9266 11213 10700 10100 9970 11100 12700 11300 13600 9270 9100 9900 9/19/2005 1:59 PM 1105 9/19/2005 2:59 PM 9/19t2005 9/19/2005 9/19/2005 9/19/2005 9/19/2005 9/19/2005 9/19/2005 9/19/2005 10:45 AM 10:37 AM 3:04 PM 2:53 PM 2:48 PM 1:56 PM 1:52 PM 1:48 PM 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 AL -Action Level Survey Release Record Scan Area Results Survey Unit 9527-0001 9527-0001 SCAN AREA I SECTIONS 1 THROUGH 8 Sample Name 9527-01-SC-01-01-0 9527-01 -SC-01 0 9527-01 -SC-01 0 9527-01-SC-01 0 9527-01-SC-01 0 9527-01-SC-01-06-0 9527-01 -SC-01-07-0 9527-01-SC-01-08-0 9527-01-SC-01-09-0 9527-01-SC-01 0 9527-01-SC-01-1 1-0 9527-01-SC-01-12-0 9527-01-SC-01-13-0 9527-01-SC-01-14-0 9527-01-SC-01-15-0 9527-01 -SC-01-16-0 9527-01 -SC-01-17-0 9527-01-SC-01-18-0 9527-01-SC-01-19-0 9527-01 -SC-01 0 9527-01-SC-01-21-0 9527-01 -SC-01-22-0 9527-01-SC-01-23-0 9527-01-SC-01-24-0 9527-01 -SC-01-25-0 9527-01 -SC-01-26-0 9527-01 -SC-01 0 9527-01 -SC-01 0 9527-01 -SC-01 0 9527-01-SC-01-30-0 Background (crmn 7340 8900 7870 7380 7420 7990 7830 7540 8200 6420 8590 8310 7420 7080 9310 8630 9110 7920 7950 6940 8590 8130 6990 8240 8890 10900 10500 10500 10300 11300 Action Level 8563 10246 9136 8606 8649 9266 9093 8779 9492 7564 9913 9611 8649 8281 10687 9956 10472 9190 9222 8129 9913 9417 8183 9535 10236 12390 11962 11962 11748 12817 Results Above Loa Date Loc Time E600 S/N Probe SIN (cormn 7320 8420 6940 7440 7820 6980 7900 6460 7630 7140 7450 8460 5830 6820 7800 6730 6970 6070 6610 7250 8530 6640 6230 6600 10900 7620 6810 7430 10100 9680 AL 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9114/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005+ 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 10:08 AM 10:10AM 10:12 AM 10:15 AM 10:19AM 10:22 AM 10:24 AM 10:27 AM 10:31 AM 10:33 AM 10:35 AM 10:38 AM 10:41 AM 10:44 AM 10:45 AM 10:48 AM 10:51 AM 10:53 AM 10:54 AM 10:56 AM 1:30 PM 1:33 PM 1:34 PM 1:36 PM 1:46 PM 1:50 PM 1:54 PM 1:56 PM 2:21 PM 2:23 PM 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 AL -Action Level Survey Release Record Scan Area Results Survey Unit 9527-0001 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 1 SECTIONS 1 THROUGH 8 Sample Name 9527-01-SC-01-31-0 9527-01-SC-01-32-0 9527-01-SC-01-33-0 9527-01-SC-01-34-0 9527-01-SC-01-35-0 9527-01-SC-01-36-0 9527-01-SC-01-37-0 9527-01-SC-01-38-0 9527-01-SC-01-39-0 9527-01-SC-0140-0 9527-01-SC-01-41-0 9527-01-SC-01-42-0 9527-01-SC-01-43-0 9527-01-SC-01-44-0 9527-01-SC-01-45-0 9527-01-SC-01-46-0 9527-01-SC-01-47-0 9527-01-SC-01-48-0 9527-01-SC-01 0 9527-01-SC-01-50-0 9527-01-SC-01-51-0 9527-01-SC-01-52-0 9527-01-SC-01-53-0 9527-01-SC-01-54-0 9527-01-SC-01-55-0 9527-01-SC-01-56-0 9527-01-SC-01-57-0 9527-01-SC-01-58-0 9527-01-SC-01-59-0 9527-01-SC--60-0 Background (cIm)10200 11100 10300 11400 9450 10600 8740 9750 10700 10200 10900 10600 12100 10400 11300 11200 11400 11500 10500 12100 10200 9750 11700 11100 10100 10900 9980 10500 10200 10800 Action Level L(CM)11641 12604 11748 12924 10837 12069 10074 11159 12176 11641 12390 12069 13670 11855 12817 12710 12924 13030 11962 13670 11641 11159 13244 12604 11534 12390 11406 11962 11641 12283 Results Above Lo Date Lon Time E600 SIN Probe SIN (crmn)10600 11300 10000 9810 10400 9130 9970 8970 9770 8550 8880 12100 8960 10300 11700 11500 11700 11100 10900 11300 10300 10400 10200 9910 10500 9570 9670 10300 9890 9250 AL 9/1412005 9/1412005 9/1412005 9/1412005 911412005 9/1412005 9114/2005 9/14/2005 9/1412005 9/1412005 9/1412005+ 9/14/2005 9/1412005 9/1412005 9/1412005 9/1412005 9/1412005 9/1412005 9/14/2005 9/14/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/2012005 9/2012005 9/2012005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 2:25 PM 2:27 PM 2:53 PM 2:56 PM 2:59 PM 3:01 PM 3:06 PM 3:09 PM 3:11 PM 3:13 PM 2:50 PM 2:53 PM 2:55 PM 2:58 PM 3:01 PM 3:03 PM 3:05 PM 3:07 PM 3:10PM 3:12 PM 8:23AM 8:29AM 8:33AM 8:37 AM 8:39AM 8:40AM 8:42 AM 8:45AM 8:46 AM 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 9/20/2005 8:48 AM 1107 AL -Action Level Survey Release Record Scan Area Results Survey Unit 9527-0001 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 1 SECTIONS 1 THROUGH 8 Sample Name Background Action Level Results Above Lon Date Loa Time E600 SIN Probe SIN icomn (ckmr) Lmn) AL 9527-01-SC-01-61-0 9100 10461 9520 9/20/2005 8:54AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-62-0 10400 11855 9010 9/20/2005 8:55AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-63-0 10200 11641 9330 9/20/2005 8:57 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-64-0 8960 10311 9260 9/20/2005 8:58 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-65-0 10100 11534 8970 9/20/2005 9:00AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-66-0 9140 10504 9840 9/20/2005 9:01 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-67-0 9360 10741 9190 9/20/2005 9:02AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-68-0 9020 10375 9330 9/20/2005 9:04AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-69-0 8700 10031 8050 9/20/2005 9:06 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-70-0 9160 10526 8150 9/20/2005 9:07 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-71-0 8870 10214 8350 9/20/2005 10:21 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-72-0 8620 9945 8790 9/20/2005 10:23 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-73-0 9380 10762 9020 9/20/2005 10:25 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-74-0 9020 10375 8870 9/20/2005 10:27 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-75-0 9280 10655 8930 9/20/2005 10:28AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-41-76-0 8640 9967 8850 9/20/2005 10:29 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-77-0 9090 10451 8740 9/20/2005 10:30AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-78-0 8570 9891 8770 9/20/2005 10:31 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-79-0 8850 10193 9750 9/20/2005 10:33AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-01-80-0 9810 11224 9620 9/20/2005 10:34AM 1107 1010 AL -Action Level Survey Release Record Scan Area Results Survey Unit 9527-0001 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 2 SECTIONS 9 THROUGH 16 Sample Name Background Action Level Results Above Lon Date Loc Time E600 S/N Probe SIN (corn{c~) (corn AL 9527-01-SC-02-01-0 7880 9147 7860 9/20/2005 10:40AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-02-0 9590 10988 9770 9/20/2005 10:42 AM 1107 1010 9527-01 -SC-02-03-0 8330 9633 8430 9/20/2005 10:43 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-04-0 8470 9783 8430 9/20/2005 10:44 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-05-0 9300 10676 9110 9/20/2005 10:45 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-06-0 8930 10279 9040 9/20/2005 10:47 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-07-0 9870 11288 10100 9/20/2005 10:49 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-08-0 9520 10912 9440 9/20/2005 10:50 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-09-0 10000 11427 9780 9/20/2005 10:51 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-10-0 9410 10794 10100 9/20/2005 10:53AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-11-0 9110 10472 8050 9/20/2005 10:56AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-12-0 9350 10730 9810 9/20/2005 10:57 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-13-0 8560 9880 8270 9/20/2005 10:59 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-14-0 8690 10020 9450 9/20/2005 11:00AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-15-0 9060 10418 8600 9/20/2005 11:01 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-16-0 8340 9643 8960 9/20/2005 11:03 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-17-0 9520 10912 7720 9/20/2005 11:05AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-18-0 8810 10150 9410 9/20/2005 11:07 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-19-0 9670 11073 9120 9/20/2005 11:08AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-20-0 10100 11534 8900 9/20/2005 11:09AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-21-0 9510 10902 9520 9/20/2005 11:12AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-22-0 10100 11534 9520 9/20/2005 11:14AM 1107 1010 9527-01 -SC-02-23-0 8350 9654 8550 9/20/2005 11:15AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-24-0 8620 9945 8880 9/20/2005 11:17AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-25-0 8210 9503 8940 9/20/2005 11:18AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-26-0 8320 9622 7010 9/20/2005 11:20 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-27-0 7200 8411 8340 9/20/2005 11:22 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-28-0 8010 9287 5660 9/20/2005 11:23 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-294 6760 7933 7260 9/20/2005 11:24AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-02-30-0 7790 9050 5390 9/20/2005 11:26AM 1107 1010 AL -Action Level Survey Release Record Scan Area Results Survey Unit 9527-0001 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 2 SECTIONS 9 THROUGH 16 Sample Name Background Action Level Results Above Loa Date Loa Time E600 SIN Probe SIN (cDm) kIa cDm ) AL 9527-01-SC-02-31-0 10800 12283 10300 9/20/2005 1:19PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-32-0 9730 11138 9060 9/20/2005 1:21 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-33-0 9490 10880 10200 9/20/2005 1:22 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-34-0 10200 11641 9230 9/20/2005 1:23 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-35-0 8790 10128 9950 9/20/2005 1:26 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-36-0 10500 11962 9620 9/20/2005 1:27 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-37-0 11000 12497 10700 9120/2005 1:29 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-38-0 9060 10418 9870 9/20/2005 1:31 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-39-0 10400 11855 9880 9/20/2005 1:32 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-40-0 10200 11641 10400 9/20/2005 1:33 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-41-0 11100 12604 11100 9/20/2005 1:36PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-42-0 10900 12390 9760 9/20/2005 1:38 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-0243-0 10700 12176 10800 9/20/2005 1:39 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-44-0 10200 11641 9940 9/20/2005 1:40 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-0245-0 10600 12069 9460 9/20/2005 1:42 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-46-0 10400 11855 9820 9/20/2005 1:43 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-47-0 10200 11641 10200 9/20/2005 1:45 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-48-0 10600 12069 9790 9/20/2005 1:46 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-49-0 10700 12176 9420 9/20/2005 1:48 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-50-0 10900 12390 10300 9/20/2005 1:49 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-51-0 10000 11427 10100 9/20/2005 1:54 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-52-0 9800 11213 9690 9/20/2005 1:55 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-53-0 10800 12283 9100 9/20/2005 1:56 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-54-0 10400 11855 9550 9/20/2005 1:58 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-55-0 10100 11534 8480 9/20/2005 2:00 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-56-0 9080 10440 9180 9/20/2005 2:02 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-57-0 9940 11363 10200 9/20/2005 2:03 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SG-02-58-0 9720 11127 9770 9/20/2005 2:05 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-59-0 9530 10923 10500 9/2012005 2:06 PM 1105 1001 9527-01-SC-02-60-0 8840 10182 9930 9/20/2005 2:07 PM 1105 1001 AL -Action Level Survey Release Record Scan Area Results Survey Unit 9527-0001 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 2 SECTIONS 9 THROUGH 16 Sample Name 9527-01-SC-02-61-0 9527-01 -SC-02-62-0 9527-01-SC-02-63-0 9527-01-SC-02-64-0 9527-01-SC-02-65-0 9527-01-SC-02-66-0 9527-01-SC-02-67-0 Background (cPm)11000 9380 11100 11000 9870 9940 10400 Action Level (cnm)12497 10762 12604 12497 11288 11363 11855 Results Above Lou Date Loa Time E600 SIN Probe SIN 8300 9590 9900 10600 10700 10600 10100 AL 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 2:09 PM 2:11 PM 2:12 PM 2:13 PM 2:15 PM 2:16 PM 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 9/20/2005 2:17 PM 1105 9527-01-SC-02-68-0 9527-01-SC-02-69-0 9527-01-SC-02-70-0 9527-01-SC-02-71-0 9527-01-SC-02-72-0 9527-01-SC-02-73-0 9527-01-SC-02-74-0 9527-01-SC-02-75-0 9527-01-SC-02-76-0 9527-01-SC-02-77-0 9527-01 -SC-02-78-0 9527-01-SC-02-79-0 9527-01-SC-02-80-0 9940 9290 10700 8670 8020 8620 7090 9620 10200 11100 8750 9490 9760 11363 10666 12176 9999 9298 9945 8292 11020 11641 12604 10085 10880 11170 9190 9480 8860 7250 8440 6710 7940 6340 5220 5090 6010 5130 8230 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/20/2005 9/2012005 2:18 PM 2:20 PM 2:21 PM 2:36 PM 2:39 PM 2:39 PM 2:43 PM 2:44 PM 2:46 PM 2:47 PM 2:49 PM 2:50 PM 2:51 PM 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 AL -Action Level Survey Release Record Scan Area Results Survey Unit 9527-0001 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 3 SECTIONS 17 THROUGH 22 Sample Name Background Action Level Results Above Loa Date Loa Time E600 SIN Probe SIN (cpm) (cLm) (com) AL 9527-01-SC-03-01-0 7350 8574 6910 9121/2005 8:31 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-02-0 6490 7640 6590 9/21/2005 8:32 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-03-0 6180 7302 5300 9121/2005 8:34 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-04-0 6320 7455 7030 9/21/2005 8:36 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-05-0 7310 8530 3820 9/21/2005 8:37 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-06-0 5210 6240 5970 9/21/2005 8:41 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-07-0 6720 7890 4290 9/21/2005 8:43 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-08-0 7240 8454 6300 9/2112005 8:43 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-09-0 6380 7520 5820 9/21/2005 8:45 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-10-0 7030 8227 7500 9/2112005 8:46 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-11-0 7340 8563 7440 9/21/2005 8:48AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-12-0 9110 10472 8380 9/21/2005 8:50AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-13-0 8500 9816 9340 9/2112005 8:51 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-14-0 8550 9870 9560 9/21/2005 8:54 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-15-0 9930 11352 8220 9/21/2005 8:55 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-16-0 8900 10246 9480 9/2112005 8:57AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-17-0 8960 10311 9370 9/21/2005 8:59AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-18-0 7810 9071 8000 9/21/2005 9:00 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-19-0 8040 9320 6500 9/21/2005 9:01 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-20-0 8190 9482 8070 9/21/2005 9:03AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-21-0 7300 8519 7470 9/21/2005 9:07 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-22-0 7210 8422 7850 9/21/2005 9:08 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-23-0 7640 8887 7040 9/2112005 9:10 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-24-0 7650 8898 8480 9/2112005 9:12 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-25-0 8280 9579 7940 9/21/2005 9:13AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-26-0 7360 8584 7090 912112005 9:14 AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-27-0 7480 8714 7890 9121/2005 9:15AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-28-0 7130 8335 5320 9121/2005 9:16AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-29-0 6450 7596 7530 9121/2005 9:18AM 1107 1010 9527-01-SC-03-30-0 7520 8758 5260 9/21/2005 9:19AM 1107 1010 AL -Action Level Survey Release Record Scan Area Results Survey Unit 9527-0001 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 3 SECTIONS 17 THROUGH 22 Sample Name 9527-01-SC-03-31-0 9527-01-SC-03-32-0 9527-01-SC-03-33-0 9527-01-SC-03-34-0 9527-01-SC-03-35-0 9527-01 -SC-03-36-0 9527-01-SC-03-37-0 9527-01-SC-03-38-0 9527-01-SC-03-39-0 9527-01-SC-03-40-0 9527-01-SC-03-41-0 9527-01-SC-03-42-0 Background (corm)8990 8640 9510 8850 7580 8860 8690 8260 7930 8480 9730 9020 Action Level 1comrn 10343 9967 10902 10193 8823 10203 10020 9557 9201 9794 11138 10375 Results Above Loa Date Loa Time E600 SIN Probe SIN (com)6210 7900 5390 6670 4470 9310 8220 7430 7580 8730 9740 9530 AL 9/21/2005 9/21/2005 9/21/2005 9/21/2005 9/21/2005 9121/2005 9121/2005 9/21/2005 9121/2005 9/21/2005 9/21/2005 9/2112005 10:26 AM 10:30 AM 10:32 AM 10:34AM 10:36 AM 10:39 AM 10:40 AM 10:42 AM 10:43 AM 10:45 AM 1:16PM 1:18PM 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1107 1105 1105 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1001 1001 9527-01-SC-03-43-0 9527-01-SC-03-44-0 9527-01-SC-03-45-0 9527-01-SC-03-46-0 9527-01-SC-03-47-0 9527-01-SC-03-48-0 9527-01-SC-03-49-0 9340 9660 7480 11100 8200 9860 10500 10719 11063 8714 12604 9492 11277 11962 10200 8010 7930 9470 9160 8870 10300 9/21/2005 9/21/2005 9/2112005 9/2112005 9/21/2005 9/21/2005 9/21/2005 1:20 PM 1:22 PM 1:24PM 1:25 PM 1:28 PM 1:29 PM 1:31 PM 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 9527-01-SC-03-50-0 9527-01-SC-03-51-0 9527-01-SC-03-52-0 9527-01-SC-03-53-0 9527-01-SC-03-54-0 9527-01-SG-03-55-0 9527-01-SC-03-56-0 9527-01 -SC-03-57-0 9527-01-SC-03-58-0 9527-01-SC-03-59-0 9527-01-SC-03-60-0 10300 9660 11000 10400 11500 10700 11400 10000 11300 11500 9970 11748 11063 12497 11855 13030 12176 12924 11427 12817 13030 11395 11300 10800 10600 10900 11700 10700 8360 10400 10200 11700 10500 9/2112005 1:33PM 1105 9/2112005 1:37PM 1105 9/21/2005 9/21/2005 9(2112005 9/21/2005 9/2112005 9/21/2005 9/21/2005 9/2112005 9/2112005 1:39 PM 1:40 PM 1:43 PM 1:44PM 1:46 PM 1:48 PM 1:49 PM 1:51 PM 1:53 PM 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1105 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 1001 AL -Action Level EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2c Split Sample Assessment Forms (2 Page) Health Physics Procedure..24265-000-GPP-GGGR-R5124-OOO-Rev.CY-000 Attacbmnent A ----...Health Physics Procedure 24265-000-GPP43GOR-R5124-000-Rev.CY-000 Attachment A Split Sample Assessment Form Survey Arca#: 9527 Survey Unit #: 0001 Survey Unit name: East Mountain Side Sample Plan or WPIR#: 2005-0054 SML#: 9527-0001-010 Sample Descriptn: Comparison of split samples collected f.r^m sample measurement location #10 and analyzed using gamnma spectroscopy by off-site Vendor Laboratory. The standard sample was 9527-0001-OlOF, the comparison sample was 952740001-OlOFS. STANDARD COMPARISON Radionuclide Activity Standard Resolution Agreement Activity Standard Comparison Acceptable Value Error Range Value Error Ratio (Y/N)Cs-137 3.31E-1 2.20E-2 15 0.6- 1.66 6.97E-1 4.402E^2 2.1 N Ra-226 9.24E-1 5.20E-2 18 0.75-1.33 8.51E-1 6.80E-2 0.9 Y Pb-214 1.12 5.OOE-2 23 0.75-1.33 1.10 6.55E-2 1.0 Y Lorn2nenTsWLorrecilve Actons: N/A i able is provided to snow acceptance criteria used to assess split samples.Resoutuioia Agrcement Rangc 4 -7 0.5 -ZO 8 -15 0.6 -1.66 16 -50 0.75 -1.33 51 -200 0.80 -1.25>200 0.85 -1.18 Performed By: Date Rev!29d By, Date -eAf4 i 3 d/ I Dt e 4 : 6G-I Page 1 of 1 Health Physics Procedure


24265-000-GPP-GGGR-R5124-000-Rev.CY-000 Attachment A Split Sample Assessment Form Survey Area#: 9527 Survey Unit #: 0001 Survey Unit name: East Mountain Side Sample Plan or WPIR#: 2005-0054 SML#: 9527-0001-013 Sample

Description:

Comparison of split samples collected fiom sample measurement location #13 and analyzed using gamnma spectroscopyby off-site Vendor Laboratory. The standard sample was 9527-0001-013F, the comparison sample was 9527-0001-013FS. STANDARD COMPARISON Radionuclide Activity Standard Resolution Agreement Activity Standard Comparison Acceptable Value Error Range Value Error Ratio (Y/N)Cs-137 4.05E-1 3.00E-2 14 0.6-1.66 4.05E-1 3.51E-2 1.0 Y Comments/Corrective Actions: N/A Table is providedto show acceptance criteria used to assess split samples.Resotufia

Srnn Range.4-7 O.S -20 8-15 0.6 -1.66 16 -50 0.75-1.33 51 -200 0.80 -1.25>200 0.85 -1.18 Performed By: Date Revi P/ 7 Date: J Wc 4 44! I e/>6az6 6r0 0 I -1 3-&--04Page 1 of 1 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2d Preliminary Data Forms (2 Pages)

P- -PELIMINARY DATA REVIEW FORM ----- ---- ------ -----WP&IRNo.: Survey Unit: Survey Unit Name: Classification: Survey Media: Type of Survey: Type of Measurement: Number of Measurements: 2005-0054 9527-0001 East Mountain Side 2 Soil Final Status Survey Radionuclide Specific 15 BASIC STATISTICAL QUANTITIES 0 Target Level (pCi/g): Minimum Value: Maximun Value: Mean: Median: Standard Deviation: Cs-137 2.53E+00 2.43E-01 1.48E+00 5A5E-01 4.50E-01 3.14E-0l Co-60 1.22E+00-1.63E-02 2.50E-02 7.59E-03 l.OOE-02 1.28E-02 Reported Results Sample Identification 9527-001-OOlF 9527-0001-002F 9527-0001-003F 9527-O00104F 9527-0001-005F 9527-0001-006F 9527-001-007F 9527-001-008F 9527-0001-009F 9527-0001-OOF 9527-0001-01 IF 9527-0001-012F 9527-0001-013F 9527-001-014F 9527-0001-015F Cs-137 Concentration (pCilg)5.19E-01 2A3E-01 8.83E-01 4.40E-01 3.12E-01 5.55E-01 5.63E-01 4.16E-01 8.07B-01 3.31E-01 5.02E-01 1.48E+00 4.05E-01 4.50E-01 2.69E-01 Co-60 Concentration (pCi/g)1.26E-02 2.43E-02-4.47E-03 L.OOE-02 4.45E-03 2.08E-02-9.59E-03 1.91E-02 6.04E-03 2.50E-02-1.63E-04-5.98E-03-1.63E-02 1.61E-02 1.19E-02 Fraction of Target Level 0.215 0.116 0.345 0.182 0.127 0.236 0.215 0.180 0.324 0.151 0.198 0.580 0.147 0.191 0.116 Reported results for the listed radionuclides did not always meet the accepted level of detection (i.e., a result greater than two standard deviations uncertainty) Submitted bylDate I .'d lorl -- ------ -----PRELIMINARY DATA REVIEW FORM --.- ----- ---l-WP&IRNo.: Survey Unit: Survey Unit Namse: Classification: Survey Media: Type of Survey: Type of Measurement: Number of Measurements: 2005-0054 9527-0001 East Mountain Side 2 Soil Final Status Survey -Biased Radionuclide Specific 3 BASIC STATISTICAL QUANTITIES Cs-137 Co-60 Target Level (pCilg): 2.53E+00 1.22E+00 Minimum Value: 4.19E-01 -3.49E-03 I MaximumnValue: 5.95E-01 1.24E-02 Mean: 5.28E-01 2.41E-03 Median: 5.71E-01 -1.69E-03 Standard Deviation: 9.54E-02 8.70E-03 Sample Identification 9527-0001-016F 9527-0001-017F 9527-0001-018F Cs-137 Concentration (pCi/g)5.95B-01 4.19E-01 5.71E-01 Reported Results Co-60 Concentration Fraction of (pCi/g) Target Level 1.24E-02 0.245-3.49E-03 0.163-1.69E-03 0.224 Reported results for the listed radionuclides did not always meet the accepted level of detection (i.e., a result greater than two standard deviations uncertainty) Submitted by/Date // ' A' P -6 A'lofil EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2e Graphical Representation of Data (2 Pages) .. Health Physics Procedure... -....G. .. ..GGR-R5.l23-000-Rev.CY.0l Attacmllent C. .....- .FREQUENCY PLOT FOR CESIUM-137 Survey Unit: 9527-0001 Survey Unit Name: East Mountain Side Mean: 5.45E-01 pCi/g Frequency Plot For Cs-137 8 7 t6 e!23 IL 2 I 0 0.243 0.490 0.736 0.983 1.230 1.476 1.723 Upper End Value (pCI~g)U rEnd Ob6semnin Obsvatian VaUe F rqueny F-euw 0.243 1 7%0.490 7 47%0.736 4 27%0.983 2 13%1.230 0 0%1.476 0 0%1.723 1 7%Q000 0 0%Tobt 15 100%Submitted By/Date 7 A a L;/J 5 -0a Reviewed By/Date Page 1 of I .....- .H ealth Physics Procedure .. .. ..-. .. -.- .. .... ... ....-.GGCGR-.R5123-MO-Rev.CY--0 I Attachment C .. ... --......-Health Physics Procedure


GGGR-R5123-000-Rcv.CY-001 Attachment C QUANTILE PLOT FOR CESIUM-137 Survey Unit: 9527-0001 Survey Unit Name East Mountain Side Mean: 5.45E-01 pCi/g Quantile Plot For Cs-1 37 I .60E+00 1.40E+00 IN II ff 1.20E+00 I I 1.OOE+O0 8.OOE-01 l6.OOE-01 o4.OOE-01 2.OOE-01 O.OOE+00 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percentage Cs-137 Rank Paetage 2.43E-01 1 3%2.69E41 2 10%3.12E-01 3 17%3.31E-01 4 23%4.05B4-1 5 30h 4.16E-01 6 37%4.40E-01 7 43%4.50E-1 S 50%5ME-01 9 57%5.19E-01 10 63%5.55E401 11 709A 5.63E-01 12 77%&07E-01 13 83%5.83E-01 14 90DA 1.48E+40 15 97%5idck- -Te'f8x?1f"CI Reviewed By/Date Page 1 of 1 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2f Sign Test Calculation (1 Page)

Connecticut Yankee Decommissioning Project Health Physics Procedure GPP-GGGR-R5121-001 Atachment B, Rev. CY-O01 MAJOR-Sign Test Calculation Sheet For Multiple badionuclides Survey Area Number: 9527 Survey Unit Number. 0001 WPIR~#: 2005-0054 Survey AreaName: East Mountain Side Classification: 2 TYPE I (a error): 0.05 N: 15 Radionuclides: Cs-137 Co-60 Sr-go C-14 Tc-99 DCGL; j 2.53E+00 1.220E+00 4.9601 1.8 I+00 4.03E0O Results 1 Rults Results 3r Results 4 .Result W S Weighted 1- W Sign Radionuclide Radionuclide Rationuolide Radionuclide Radionuclid Sum (W.)_____) (pCilg) _Ci/_p (pCi/g) a 5.19E-0I 1.26E02 _ -0.215 0.785 +2.43E-01 2.43E-02 0.116 0.884 +8.83E-01 -4.47E-03 0.345 0.655 +4.40E-01 1.OOE-02 2.05E-02 1.15E-01 2.37E-01 0346 0.654 +3.12E-01 4.45E-03 0.127 0.873 +S.55E-01 2.08S02 -1.88E-02 1.03B-01 2.00E-01 0.305 0.695 5.63E-01 -9.59P03 -1.031-03 1.36-01 1.07E-01 0.314 0.686 +4.16B-01 1.91E-02 0.180 0.820 +8.0713-01 6.04E-03 _ 0.324 0.676 +3.311-01 2.50E-02 0.151 0.849 +5.02E-01 -1.63E-04 0.198 0.802 +1.48E+00 -5.98E-03 0.580 0.420 +4.05E-01 -1.63E-02 0.147 0.853 +4.50E-01 1.615-02 0 1__ ,91 0.809 +2.69B-01 1.19E-02 0.116 0.884 +Number of ositive differ eces (S+): 1S Critical Value: .IL Survey UnitMeJ Acceptance Criterion Perfoin~ed by:.I'lorl-I r4l.yjd ,,-Ie4A Dat: '3110_ 7 Page 1 of 1 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Attachment 2g COMPASS DQA Surface Soil Report with Retrospective Power Curve (4 Pages) -- -DQA Surface Soil Report Assessment Summary Site: Planner(s): Survey Unit Name: Report Number Survey Unit Samples: Reference Area Samples: Test Performed: Judgmental Samples: Assessment

== Conclusion:==

9527-0001 FSS 'McCarthy 61 > =/ ' , East Mountain Side I 15 0 Sign Test Result: Not Performed 0 EMC Result: Not Performed Reject Null Hypothesis (Survey Unit PASSES)Retrospective Power Curve i 1= 0.9'4 L 0.8 Lr.iE OA ie 03& 02 b 0.1 r_ 0--I___ -_ %I_ _ _ _ l i.%'_=__' _._ _ .....I I-I--0.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.8 1D 1ni# Rule Sum-4fRafios, hwluzig bIakgrouM-. -Prospective Power a 1-beta --Actual Power-LBG --Estimated Power-D CGL -- Retrospective Power 12 COMPASS v1.0.0 3Mnn06 Page I -DQA SurFace Soil Report Survey Unit Data NOTE: Type- S" Indicates suvey unit sample.Type -R' indicates reference ara sample.Sample Number Type 9527-00101-F S 9527-001-002F S 9527-0001-003F S 9527-4001-004F S 9527-0001-005F S 9527-0001-006F S 9527-0001-07F S 95274001-008F S 9527-0001-40F S 9527-0001-01OF S 9527-0001-011F S 9527-000-012F S 952740001-013F S 9527-001-014F S 95274001-015F S C-44(pCVg) 0 0 0 0.12 0 0.1 0.14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co-60 (pCUg)0.01 0.02 0 0.01 0 0.02-0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0-0.01-0.02 0.02 0.01 Cs 37 (pCqg)0.52 0.24 0.88 0.44 0.31 0.56 0.56 0.42 0.81 0.33 0.5 1.48 0.4 0.45 0.27 Sample Number 9527-0001-001F 952740001402F 9527-0001403F 9527-0001-004F 9527-0001-05F 9527-001-006F 9527-0001-40F 9527-0001-408F 9527-00014009F 9527-0001-0IOF 9527-0001-11F 952740001412F 9527-0001413F 9527-4001-014F 9527-00014-15F Type S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SrY-90 (pClg)0 0 0 0.02 0-0.02 0 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 0 Tc499 (pClg)0 0 0 0.24 0 0.2 0.11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COMPASS v..0e 31612W6 Page 2 %W DQA Surface Soil Report Modified Data (Unity Rule SOR)NOTE Type- S'ndicaessureywatsarpe. Type -W hdcat reference aea sample.Sample Number g527W01-001 F 9527-0001-002F 9527-001-003F 9527-0001-004F 9527-0001-OOSF 9527-0001-006F 9527-0001-007F 9527-0001-008F 952740 -009F 9527-0001-OlOF 9527-01-IF 9527-0001-012F 9527-0001-013F 9527-0001-014F 8527-0001-015F Typ S S S S S S S S S Sum-of-Ratlos (SOR)0.22 0.12 0.35 0.35 0.13 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.32 0.15 0.2 0.58 0.15 0.19 0.12 COMPASS p1.0.0 318/2006 Page 3 COMPASS v1.0.0 31u1206 Page 3 --DQA Surface Soil Report Basic Statistical Quantities Summary Statistic Survey Unit Background DQO Results Sample Number 15 N/A N=15 Mean (SOR) 0.25 NIA 0.31 Median (SOR) 0.20 NIA NIA SWi Dev(SOR) 0.13 NIA 0.11 H-gh Value (SOR) 0.58 N/A NIA Low Value (SOR) 0.12 N/A W/Avi.u.u 31512008 Page 4 WM PASS v V1.0.3;12006 Page 4}}