ML073330349: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 11/30/2007
| issue date = 11/30/2007
| title = Ltr to Sherwood Martinelli from P. T. Kuo Re.: Environmental Costs of Terrorist Attack in the EIS Scoping Process
| title = Ltr to Sherwood Martinelli from P. T. Kuo Re.: Environmental Costs of Terrorist Attack in the EIS Scoping Process
| author name = Kuo P T
| author name = Kuo P
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR
| addressee name = Martinelli S
| addressee name = Martinelli S
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:November 30, 2007  
{{#Wiki_filter:November 30, 2007 Mr. Sherwood Martinelli Vice President FUSE USA, Inc.
 
351 Dyckman Street Peekskill, NY 10566
Mr. Sherwood Martinelli Vice President FUSE USA, Inc.
351 Dyckman Street Peekskill, NY 10566  


==Dear Mr. Martinelli:==
==Dear Mr. Martinelli:==


I am writing with regard to your e-mail communication of September 21, 2007, in which you presented a "formal request under the guidelines of 10 CFR 2.206 . . . that the Environmental Costs of a targeted terrorist attack on Indian Point be included in the [environmental impact]
I am writing with regard to your e-mail communication of September 21, 2007, in which you presented a formal request under the guidelines of 10 CFR 2.206 . . . that the Environmental Costs of a targeted terrorist attack on Indian Point be included in the [environmental impact]
scoping process for Indian Point [license renewal].By letter dated October 24, 2007, Mr. Ho Nieh of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) responded to your request, stating that it does not meet the criteria for consideration as a petition under 10 CFR § 2.206, but that your request would be reviewed by the NRR Division of License Renewal (DLR).  
scoping process for Indian Point [license renewal]. By letter dated October 24, 2007, Mr. Ho Nieh of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) responded to your request, stating that it does not meet the criteria for consideration as a petition under 10 CFR § 2.206, but that your request would be reviewed by the NRR Division of License Renewal (DLR).
 
The DLR has reviewed your e-mail communication and has determined that no further action is warranted at this time. In a letter to Susan Shapiro of FUSE dated July 25, 2007, responding to her letter of June 26, 2007, I noted that the Commission had reaffirmed its position on this issue in Amergen Energy Co., LLC (Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station), CLI-07-8, 65 NRC 124 (2007), in which the Commission concluded, in part, that "National Environmental Policy Act does not require the NRC to consider the environmental consequences of hypothetical terrorist attacks on NRC-licensed facilities." Id. at 129. Inasmuch as your comment concerns the scope of the Environmental Impact Statement to be prepared for the Indian Point license renewal application, it will be considered along with other comments received concerning the scoping process.
The DLR has reviewed your e-mail communication and has determined that no further action is warranted at this time. In a letter to Susan Shapiro of FUSE dated July 25, 2007, responding to her letter of June 26, 2007, I noted that the Commission had reaffirmed its position on this issue in Amergen Energy Co., LLC (Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station), CLI-07-8, 65 NRC 124 (2007), in which the Commission concluded, in part, that "National Environmental Policy Act does not require the NRC to consider the environmental consequences of hypothetical terrorist attacks on NRC-licensed facilities." Id. at 129. Inasmuch as your comment concerns the scope of the Environmental Impact Statement to be prepared for the Indian Point license renewal application, it will be considered along with other comments received c oncerning t he scoping process.  
Thank you for your interest in the license renewal process for Indian Point.
 
Sincerely,
Thank you for your interest in the license renewal process for Indian Point.  
                                              /RA Samson Lee for/
 
Pao-Tsin Kuo, Director Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Sincerely,  
/RA Samson Lee for/  


Pao-Tsin Kuo, Director Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Pkg: ML072850100, Rsp: ML073330349, Incoming: ML072700245 OFFICE LA:DLR           PM:RPB2:DLR       OGC               BC:RPB2:DLR       D:DLR NAME     SFigueroa     BPham             STurk             RFranovich       PTKuo DATE     11/27/07       11/27/07         11/28/07         11/30/07         11/30/07 Letter to S. Martinelli from P. T. Kuo, dated November 30, 2007
 
Pkg: ML072850100, Rsp: ML073330349, Incoming: ML072700245 OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR OGC BC:RPB2:DLR D:DLR NAME SFigueroa BPham STurk RFranovich PTKuo DATE 11/27/07 11/27/07 11/28/07 11/30/07 11/30/07 Letter to S. Martinelli from P. T. Kuo, dated November 30, 2007


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
G20070671/LTR-07-0644/EDATS: SECY-2007-0377 - LTR TO S. MARTINELLI RE: FORMAL REQUEST UNDER THE GUIDELINES OF 10 CFR 2.206 TO HAVE THE ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS OF A TERRORIST ATTACK INCLUDED IN THE EIS SCOPING FOR INDIAN POINT  
G20070671/LTR-07-0644/EDATS: SECY-2007-0377 - LTR TO S. MARTINELLI RE: FORMAL REQUEST UNDER THE GUIDELINES OF 10 CFR 2.206 TO HAVE THE ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS OF A TERRORIST ATTACK INCLUDED IN THE EIS SCOPING FOR INDIAN POINT DISTRIBUTION:
 
DISTRIBUTION:
HARD COPY:
HARD COPY:
DLR R/F E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRpb1 RidsNrrDlrRpb2 RidsNrrDlrRer1 RidsNrrDlrRer2 RidsNrrDlrRerb RidsNrrDlrRpob RidsNrrDciCvib RidsNrrDciCpnb RidsNrrDraAfpb RidsNrrDraAplb RidsNrrDeEmcb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDssSbwb RidsNrrDssSbpb RidsNrrDssScvb RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrWpcMail RidsNrrOd RidsNrrAdro RidsNrrAdes RidsEdoMailCenter RidsNsirMailCenter
DLR R/F E-MAIL:
--------------------------
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRpb1 RidsNrrDlrRpb2 RidsNrrDlrRer1 RidsNrrDlrRer2 RidsNrrDlrRerb RidsNrrDlrRpob RidsNrrDciCvib RidsNrrDciCpnb RidsNrrDraAfpb RidsNrrDraAplb RidsNrrDeEmcb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDssSbwb RidsNrrDssSbpb RidsNrrDssScvb RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrWpcMail RidsNrrOd RidsNrrAdro RidsNrrAdes RidsEdoMailCenter RidsNsirMailCenter RFranovich                             DJackson, RI           RConte, RI BPham                                   GMeyer, RI             RBarkley, RI KGreen                                 BWelling, RI JCaverly                               MMcLaughlin, RI RAuluck                                 NMcNamara, RI KChang                                 CHott, RI MKowal                                 PCataldo, RI JBoska                                 MCox, RI STurk, OGC                             ECobey, RI LSubin, OGC                             EDacus, OCA BMizuno, OGC                           TMensah, OEDO SBurnell, OPA                           NSheehan, RI OPA DMcIntyre, OPA                         DScrenci, RI OPA}}
RFranovich   DJackson, RI   RConte, RI BPham   GMeyer, RI   RBarkley, RI KGreen   BWelling, RI JCaverly   MMcLaughlin, RI RAuluck   NMcNamara, RI KChang   CHott, RI MKowal   PCataldo, RI JBoska     MCox, RI STurk, OGC     ECobey, RI LSubin, OGC     EDacus, OCA BMizuno, OGC   TMensah, OEDO SBurnell, OPA   NSheehan, RI OPA DMcIntyre, OPA   DScrenci, RI OPA}}

Latest revision as of 08:55, 13 March 2020

Ltr to Sherwood Martinelli from P. T. Kuo Re.: Environmental Costs of Terrorist Attack in the EIS Scoping Process
ML073330349
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/2007
From: Kuo P
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR
To: Martinelli S
Friends United for Sustainable Energy (FUSE)
PHAM, B, NRR, RPB2, 301-415-8450
Shared Package
ML072850100 List:
References
EDATS: SECY-2007-0377, G20070671, LTR-07-0644, SECY-2007-0377, TAC MD6837, TAC MD6838
Download: ML073330349 (3)


Text

November 30, 2007 Mr. Sherwood Martinelli Vice President FUSE USA, Inc.

351 Dyckman Street Peekskill, NY 10566

Dear Mr. Martinelli:

I am writing with regard to your e-mail communication of September 21, 2007, in which you presented a formal request under the guidelines of 10 CFR 2.206 . . . that the Environmental Costs of a targeted terrorist attack on Indian Point be included in the [environmental impact]

scoping process for Indian Point [license renewal]. By letter dated October 24, 2007, Mr. Ho Nieh of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) responded to your request, stating that it does not meet the criteria for consideration as a petition under 10 CFR § 2.206, but that your request would be reviewed by the NRR Division of License Renewal (DLR).

The DLR has reviewed your e-mail communication and has determined that no further action is warranted at this time. In a letter to Susan Shapiro of FUSE dated July 25, 2007, responding to her letter of June 26, 2007, I noted that the Commission had reaffirmed its position on this issue in Amergen Energy Co., LLC (Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station), CLI-07-8, 65 NRC 124 (2007), in which the Commission concluded, in part, that "National Environmental Policy Act does not require the NRC to consider the environmental consequences of hypothetical terrorist attacks on NRC-licensed facilities." Id. at 129. Inasmuch as your comment concerns the scope of the Environmental Impact Statement to be prepared for the Indian Point license renewal application, it will be considered along with other comments received concerning the scoping process.

Thank you for your interest in the license renewal process for Indian Point.

Sincerely,

/RA Samson Lee for/

Pao-Tsin Kuo, Director Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Pkg: ML072850100, Rsp: ML073330349, Incoming: ML072700245 OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR OGC BC:RPB2:DLR D:DLR NAME SFigueroa BPham STurk RFranovich PTKuo DATE 11/27/07 11/27/07 11/28/07 11/30/07 11/30/07 Letter to S. Martinelli from P. T. Kuo, dated November 30, 2007

SUBJECT:

G20070671/LTR-07-0644/EDATS: SECY-2007-0377 - LTR TO S. MARTINELLI RE: FORMAL REQUEST UNDER THE GUIDELINES OF 10 CFR 2.206 TO HAVE THE ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS OF A TERRORIST ATTACK INCLUDED IN THE EIS SCOPING FOR INDIAN POINT DISTRIBUTION:

HARD COPY:

DLR R/F E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRpb1 RidsNrrDlrRpb2 RidsNrrDlrRer1 RidsNrrDlrRer2 RidsNrrDlrRerb RidsNrrDlrRpob RidsNrrDciCvib RidsNrrDciCpnb RidsNrrDraAfpb RidsNrrDraAplb RidsNrrDeEmcb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDssSbwb RidsNrrDssSbpb RidsNrrDssScvb RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrWpcMail RidsNrrOd RidsNrrAdro RidsNrrAdes RidsEdoMailCenter RidsNsirMailCenter RFranovich DJackson, RI RConte, RI BPham GMeyer, RI RBarkley, RI KGreen BWelling, RI JCaverly MMcLaughlin, RI RAuluck NMcNamara, RI KChang CHott, RI MKowal PCataldo, RI JBoska MCox, RI STurk, OGC ECobey, RI LSubin, OGC EDacus, OCA BMizuno, OGC TMensah, OEDO SBurnell, OPA NSheehan, RI OPA DMcIntyre, OPA DScrenci, RI OPA