IR 05000454/2017405: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
SUBJECT: BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 | SUBJECT: BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 | ||
- NRC SECURITY BASELINE INSPECTION REPORT | - NRC SECURITY BASELINE INSPECTION REPORT 05000 454/2017 40 5; 05000 455/2017 40 5 Dear Mr. Hanson | ||
: On September 1, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security inspection at your Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 | : On September 1, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security inspection at your Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 | ||
, and the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. P. Boyle and other members of your staf The inspectors documented the results of this inspection in the enclosed inspection repor The NRC inspectors documented two findings of very low security significance (Green) in this repor These findings involved violations of NRC requirement The NRC is treating these violations as | , and the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. P. Boyle and other members of your staf The inspectors documented the results of this inspection in the enclosed inspection repor The NRC inspectors documented two findings of very low security significance (Green) in this repor These findings involved violations of NRC requirement The NRC is treating these violations as N on-Cited Violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Polic Cross-cutting aspect s were assigned to the finding s in the area of Human Performanc Specifically, Byron failed to ensure that personnel, equipment, procedures, and other resources are available and adequate to support nuclear security [H.1] and Byron failed to use decision making-practices that emphasize prudent choices over those that are simply allowable | ||
[H.14]. If you contest the violation or significance of the NCVs, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: | [H.14]. If you contest the violation or significance of the NCVs, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: | ||
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 | Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 | ||
-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region III; the Director, Office of Enforcement; the Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Byron Statio If you disagree with the cross | -0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region III; the Director, Office of Enforcement; the Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Byron Statio If you disagree with the cross | ||
-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region III, and the NRC Resident Inspector at Byron Statio Enclosure contains Sensitive Unclassified Non | -cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region III, and the NRC Resident Inspector at Byron Statio Enclosure contains Sensitive Unclassified Non | ||
-Safeguards Informatio When separated from enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolle B. Hanson | -Safeguards Informatio When separated from enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolle B. Hanson -2 This letter will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading | ||
-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding." | -rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding." | ||
Line 42: | Line 40: | ||
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with yo | Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with yo | ||
Sincerely,/RA/ Kenneth Riemer, Acting Branch Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50 | Sincerely,/RA/ Kenneth Riemer , Acting Branch Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50 | ||
-454; 50-455 License Nos. NPF | -454; 50-455 License Nos. NPF | ||
-37; NPF-66 Nonpublic | -37; NPF-66 Nonpublic | ||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
Inspection Report | Inspection Report 05000 454/201740 5; 05000 455/201740 5 cc: | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 13:09, 7 July 2018
ML17270A409 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Byron |
Issue date: | 09/27/2017 |
From: | Kenneth Riemer Plant Support Branch II |
To: | Bryan Hanson Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
References | |
IR 2017405 | |
Download: ML17270A409 (3) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUIT E 210 LISLE, IL 60532
-4352 September 27, 2017 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT: BYRON STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2
- NRC SECURITY BASELINE INSPECTION REPORT 05000 454/2017 40 5; 05000 455/2017 40 5 Dear Mr. Hanson
- On September 1, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security inspection at your Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
, and the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. P. Boyle and other members of your staf The inspectors documented the results of this inspection in the enclosed inspection repor The NRC inspectors documented two findings of very low security significance (Green) in this repor These findings involved violations of NRC requirement The NRC is treating these violations as N on-Cited Violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Polic Cross-cutting aspect s were assigned to the finding s in the area of Human Performanc Specifically, Byron failed to ensure that personnel, equipment, procedures, and other resources are available and adequate to support nuclear security [H.1] and Byron failed to use decision making-practices that emphasize prudent choices over those that are simply allowable
[H.14]. If you contest the violation or significance of the NCVs, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555
-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region III; the Director, Office of Enforcement; the Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Byron Statio If you disagree with the cross
-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region III, and the NRC Resident Inspector at Byron Statio Enclosure contains Sensitive Unclassified Non
-Safeguards Informatio When separated from enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolle B. Hanson -2 This letter will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding."
However, the enclosed report contains Security
-Related Information, so the enclosed report will not be made publically available in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1). If you choose to provide a response that contains Security
-Related Information, please mark your entire response "Security
-Related Information
-Withhold from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390" in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). The NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii).
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with yo
Sincerely,/RA/ Kenneth Riemer , Acting Branch Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50
-454; 50-455 License Nos. NPF
-37; NPF-66 Nonpublic
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000 454/201740 5; 05000 455/201740 5 cc: