|
|
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:Cindy Bladey I Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN-12 H08 ......;c~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i Washington, DC 205 55-0001.......I" .......Docket ID NRC-2009-0552 Comments on Pacific Gas & Electric proposal to re-license the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power PlantI very strongly oppose the proposal to renew the Pacific Gas & Electric license for the DiabloCanyon Nuclear Power Plant. Given the fact that PG&E was unaware of the extent of earthquakefaults under or adjacent to the site ("13 intersecting earthquake faults in a tsunami zone onCalifornia's coast north of Santa Barbara" http://nonukesca.net/?p=616) when the Diablo Canyonnuclear power plant was designed, sited, and built, that alone should be cause to dismiss theapplication for an extension of the aging plant. Japan's experience of the Fukushima disasterdemonstrates why the NRC should undertake immediately the closure of the Diablo Canyon plant,similarly located on the coast of the Pacific Ocean adjacent to earthquake faults. Even if the planthad been sited in a less dangerous location, by now its age alone warrants its closure. The NRCitself lists the Diablo Canyon Unit 1 as one of the five worst embrittled pressurized water reactorsin the U.S.In addition, its archaic cooling system does not meet California's 2010 policy mandate that coastalpower plants put in place less destructive cooling systems. It takes an estimated 2.5 billion gallonsof ocean water per day, returning it to the ocean 20 degrees hotter, killing untold numbers of fishand adding to the huge problem of warming oceans.It is time for the NRC to respect the 1976 California law to prohibit further investment in nuclearenergy until such time as a permanent, secure storage of radioactive waste is devised. Since the'US is further than ever from a permanent, reliably safe solution for storing radioactive waste, itwould be grossly irresponsible for the NRC to renew the license for this aged-out power plant.The discovery of how 13 earthquake faults intersect at or near the site, not known when the plantwas designed, and the absence of a permanent storage of the radioactive waste the plantcontinues to produce provide more than sufficient reason to reject the renewal proposal and toclose this aged plant now. The potential horrific consequences to the people and the state ofCalifornia if the plant's license were renewed can now be readily envisioned as we see the extent ofongoing damage wrought by the Fukushima disaster.Sincerely,Charlene M. Woodcock SUNSI Review Complete2355 Virginia Street Template = ADM -013Berkeley CA 94709 E-RIDS= ADM-03 , ,Add=}} | | {{#Wiki_filter:Cindy Bladey I Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN-12 H08 ......;c~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i Washington, DC 205 55-0001....... |
| | I" .......Docket ID NRC-2009-0552 Comments on Pacific Gas & Electric proposal to re-license the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power PlantI very strongly oppose the proposal to renew the Pacific Gas & Electric license for the DiabloCanyon Nuclear Power Plant. Given the fact that PG&E was unaware of the extent of earthquake faults under or adjacent to the site ("13 intersecting earthquake faults in a tsunami zone onCalifornia's coast north of Santa Barbara" http://nonukesca.net/?p=616) when the Diablo Canyonnuclear power plant was designed, sited, and built, that alone should be cause to dismiss theapplication for an extension of the aging plant. Japan's experience of the Fukushima disasterdemonstrates why the NRC should undertake immediately the closure of the Diablo Canyon plant,similarly located on the coast of the Pacific Ocean adjacent to earthquake faults. Even if the planthad been sited in a less dangerous |
| | : location, by now its age alone warrants its closure. |
| | The NRCitself lists the Diablo Canyon Unit 1 as one of the five worst embrittled pressurized water reactorsin the U.S.In addition, its archaic cooling system does not meet California's 2010 policy mandate that coastalpower plants put in place less destructive cooling systems. |
| | It takes an estimated 2.5 billion gallonsof ocean water per day, returning it to the ocean 20 degrees hotter, killing untold numbers of fishand adding to the huge problem of warming oceans.It is time for the NRC to respect the 1976 California law to prohibit further investment in nuclearenergy until such time as a permanent, secure storage of radioactive waste is devised. |
| | Since the'US is further than ever from a permanent, reliably safe solution for storing radioactive waste, itwould be grossly irresponsible for the NRC to renew the license for this aged-out power plant.The discovery of how 13 earthquake faults intersect at or near the site, not known when the plantwas designed, and the absence of a permanent storage of the radioactive waste the plantcontinues to produce provide more than sufficient reason to reject the renewal proposal and toclose this aged plant now. The potential horrific consequences to the people and the state ofCalifornia if the plant's license were renewed can now be readily envisioned as we see the extent ofongoing damage wrought by the Fukushima disaster. |
| | Sincerely, Charlene M. Woodcock SUNSI Review Complete2355 Virginia Street Template |
| | = ADM -013Berkeley CA 94709 E-RIDS= ADM-03 , ,Add=}} |
Revision as of 21:53, 30 June 2018
|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML24029A2902024-01-29029 January 2024 Comment (3) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24025A1542024-01-25025 January 2024 Comment (2) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML24025A1402024-01-24024 January 2024 Comment (1) E-mail Regarding Diablo Canyon Lr EIS Scoping ML22228A1642022-08-15015 August 2022 Comment (5) of Cindy Marie Absey, Neil Havlik & Kim Murry on Behalf of League of Women Voters of San Luis Obispo County, Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activ ML22203A0462022-07-21021 July 2022 Comment (3) of Californians for Green Nuclear Power, Inc., on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML22203A0452022-07-21021 July 2022 Comment (2) of Jane Swanson on Behalf of San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML22202A4242022-07-19019 July 2022 Comment (1) of Anonymous on Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML15275A2152015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (40) of Bruce Campbell on Helium Finding Adds New Wrinkle to Newport-Inglewood Fault ML15275A2132015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (38) of Mary Ivora on Environmental Benefits of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant ML15275A2292015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (31) Regarding Civilian Nuclear Power ML15275A2282015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (30) of Unknown Individual Opposing Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 ML15275A2302015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (32) of Joe Ivora Supporting the Relicensing of Diablo Canyon ML15275A2342015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (36) of Elizabeth Brousse on Behalf of Mothers for Peace on the License Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant ML15275A2312015-09-30030 September 2015 Comment (33) of Debby Nicklas, on Behalf of French Hospital Medical Center, Supporting the License Renewal and Ongoing Operations of PG&E ML15282A3002015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (45) of Allen Myers Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15289A3742015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (84) of Gene Nelson of Californians for Green Nuclear Power Supporting Renewal of the License Application for Diablo Canyon Power Plant ML15292A5462015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (103) of Becky Ota and Craig Shuman, on Behalf of California Department of Fish and Wildlife, on Notice of Intent to Reinitiate the Environmental Scoping Process for the Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant License Renewal ML15287A4362015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (71) of Gene Nelson Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact ML15282A2982015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (43) of Minea Herwitz Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15258A3472015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (29) of Craig Shuman on Behalf of the State of CA - Natural Resources Agency, Regarding Notice of Intent to Reinitiate the Environmental Scoping Process for the Review of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 ML15282A3042015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (49) of David Traub Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15282A3032015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (48) of Anonymous Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant License Renewal ML15292A5452015-09-0101 September 2015 Comment (102) of Bruce Campbell on Deis in Regards to Diablo Canyon Facility License Extension ML15292A2362015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (92) of Oliver Mellan on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A2352015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (91) of Alexander Cannara on Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2372015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (93) of Bob Greene on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2382015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (88) of Meagan Wilson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A2392015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (89) of Mike Kirkwood on Behalf of Economic Alliance of Northern Santa Barbara County on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A2402015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (90) of Oliver Mellan on Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant License ML15292A3392015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (94) of Sarah Risley, Heather Tarango, Shilo Terek, Megan Wilson, and Kristin Zaitz Supporting Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3402015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (95) of Madeline Cimone on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3412015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (96) of Daryl Gale Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3892015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (97) of Anthony Allen Bisset Opposing on the Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 License; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3902015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (98) of Joseph Ivora on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15258A3452015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (28) of Ann Mcpherson, on Behalf of Us EPA, on Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Operating License Renewal for Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 and 2, San Luis Obispo County, California ML15292A3912015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (99) of Nina Beety, on Behalf of Smart Meter Harm, Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A3922015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (100) of Margaret Smith on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15292A5442015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (101) of Antoinette Stein on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A4052015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (82) of Anthony Armini on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4032015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (81) of William P Gloege on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A3132015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (83) of Gene Nelson Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3142015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (85) of Lmh Anonymous Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3152015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (86) from Anonymous Opposing Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3162015-08-31031 August 2015 Comment (87) of Steve Mcgrath Opposing the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement ML15289A3982015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (76) William P. Gloege of Supporting Re-Licensing of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant ML15289A4022015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (80) of Jerry Brown on Behalf of World Business Academy on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4012015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (79) of Kirk Gothier on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A4002015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (78) of Gene Nelson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal ML15289A3992015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (77) of Gene Nelson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Renewal ML15289A3972015-08-30030 August 2015 Comment (75) of Jane Swanson on Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; License Renewal 2024-01-29
[Table view] |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:Cindy Bladey I Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN-12 H08 ......;c~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i Washington, DC 205 55-0001.......
I" .......Docket ID NRC-2009-0552 Comments on Pacific Gas & Electric proposal to re-license the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power PlantI very strongly oppose the proposal to renew the Pacific Gas & Electric license for the DiabloCanyon Nuclear Power Plant. Given the fact that PG&E was unaware of the extent of earthquake faults under or adjacent to the site ("13 intersecting earthquake faults in a tsunami zone onCalifornia's coast north of Santa Barbara" http://nonukesca.net/?p=616) when the Diablo Canyonnuclear power plant was designed, sited, and built, that alone should be cause to dismiss theapplication for an extension of the aging plant. Japan's experience of the Fukushima disasterdemonstrates why the NRC should undertake immediately the closure of the Diablo Canyon plant,similarly located on the coast of the Pacific Ocean adjacent to earthquake faults. Even if the planthad been sited in a less dangerous
- location, by now its age alone warrants its closure.
The NRCitself lists the Diablo Canyon Unit 1 as one of the five worst embrittled pressurized water reactorsin the U.S.In addition, its archaic cooling system does not meet California's 2010 policy mandate that coastalpower plants put in place less destructive cooling systems.
It takes an estimated 2.5 billion gallonsof ocean water per day, returning it to the ocean 20 degrees hotter, killing untold numbers of fishand adding to the huge problem of warming oceans.It is time for the NRC to respect the 1976 California law to prohibit further investment in nuclearenergy until such time as a permanent, secure storage of radioactive waste is devised.
Since the'US is further than ever from a permanent, reliably safe solution for storing radioactive waste, itwould be grossly irresponsible for the NRC to renew the license for this aged-out power plant.The discovery of how 13 earthquake faults intersect at or near the site, not known when the plantwas designed, and the absence of a permanent storage of the radioactive waste the plantcontinues to produce provide more than sufficient reason to reject the renewal proposal and toclose this aged plant now. The potential horrific consequences to the people and the state ofCalifornia if the plant's license were renewed can now be readily envisioned as we see the extent ofongoing damage wrought by the Fukushima disaster.
Sincerely, Charlene M. Woodcock SUNSI Review Complete2355 Virginia Street Template
= ADM -013Berkeley CA 94709 E-RIDS= ADM-03 , ,Add=}}