ML15252A443: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:
{{#Wiki_filter:FIGURE 1   
{{#Wiki_filter:FIGURE 1   


Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BEe) and without embrittlement (BEne). Note:  (1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life. (3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life. BEne 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2) CUFen Limit Line (LL) Best Estimate (BE) (3) BEe 1.0 (2) (1)  - EOL (PEO) TIME}}
Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BE e) and without embrittlement (BE ne). Note:  (1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life.  
(3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life.
BEne 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2) CUFen Limit Line (LL)
Best Estimate (BE)
(3) BEe 1.0 (2) (1)  - EOL (PEO) TIME}}

Revision as of 20:27, 30 June 2018

NYS000566 - Figure 1 for Supplemental Reply Testimony of Dr. Richard T. Lahey
ML15252A443
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/2015
From:
State of NY, Office of the Attorney General
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 28270, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR
Download: ML15252A443 (1)


Text

FIGURE 1

Figure 1: Comparison of Limit Line (LL) and Best Estimate (BE) predictions, with embrittlement (BE e) and without embrittlement (BE ne). Note: (1) BEne predicts possible failure at end of life (EOL). (2) BEe predicts failure (CUFen = 1.0) before end of life.

(3) BEe predicts possible failure well before end of life.

BEne 1017 FLUENCE (n/cm2) CUFen Limit Line (LL)

Best Estimate (BE)

(3) BEe 1.0 (2) (1) - EOL (PEO) TIME