ML16207A018: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Lyon, FredSent:Friday, July 22, 2016 7:56 AMTo:MATZKE, ERICK PCc:Burkhardt, Janet
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Lyon, Fred Sent:Friday, July 22, 2016 7:56 AM To:MATZKE, ERICK P Cc:Burkhardt, Janet


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 25: Line 25:
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of the request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.   
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of the request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.   


The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed changes in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded t hat it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed changes in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
 
The NRC staff noted that your request cites NEI 15-04, which has not been endorsed by the NRC. If the staff approves your request, it does not then correspond that the NRC endorses NEI 15-04. NRC approval of a document that uses a non-NRC endorsed report should not be construed as a de facto NRC endorsement of that report.
The NRC staff noted that your request cites NEI 15-04, which has not been endorsed by the NRC. If the staff approves your request, it does not then correspond that the NRC endorses NEI 15-04. NRC approval of a document that uses a non-NRC endorsed report should not be construed as a de facto NRC endorsement of that report.
Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  2954  Mail Envelope Properties  (Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov20160722075500)  
Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  2954  Mail Envelope Properties  (Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov20160722075500)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review (CAC No. MF8112)  Sent Date:  7/22/2016 7:55:57 AM  Received Date:  7/22/2016 7:55:00 AM From:    Lyon, Fred Created By:  Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov Recipients:    "Burkhardt, Janet" <Janet.Burkhardt@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None  "MATZKE, ERICK P" <ematzke@oppd.com>
Acceptance Review (CAC No. MF8112)  Sent Date:  7/22/2016 7:55:57 AM  Received Date:  7/22/2016 7:55:00 AM From:    Lyon, Fred Created By:  Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov Recipients:    "Burkhardt, Janet" <Janet.Burkhardt@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None  "MATZKE, ERICK P" <ematzke@oppd.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:      Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    1524      7/22/2016 7:55:00 AM Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None Post Office:      Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    1524      7/22/2016 7:55:00 AM
 
Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 05:37, 30 June 2018

2016/07/22 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review (CAC No. MF8112)
ML16207A018
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 07/22/2016
From: Lyon F E
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Matzke E P
Omaha Public Power District
References
MF8112
Download: ML16207A018 (2)
v • d • e


Text

1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Lyon, Fred Sent:Friday, July 22, 2016 7:56 AM To:MATZKE, ERICK P Cc:Burkhardt, Janet

Subject:

Acceptance Review (CAC No. MF8112)By letter dated July 7, 2016, OPPD submitted a request for approval of its certified fuel handler training and retraining program for FCS.

The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of the request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded t hat it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed changes in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

The NRC staff noted that your request cites NEI 15-04, which has not been endorsed by the NRC. If the staff approves your request, it does not then correspond that the NRC endorses NEI 15-04. NRC approval of a document that uses a non-NRC endorsed report should not be construed as a de facto NRC endorsement of that report.

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2954 Mail Envelope Properties (Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov20160722075500)

Subject:

Acceptance Review (CAC No. MF8112) Sent Date: 7/22/2016 7:55:57 AM Received Date: 7/22/2016 7:55:00 AM From: Lyon, Fred Created By: Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov Recipients: "Burkhardt, Janet" <Janet.Burkhardt@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "MATZKE, ERICK P" <ematzke@oppd.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1524 7/22/2016 7:55:00 AM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16207A018&oldid=763235"