ML17207A676: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1131N.E.86StreetMiami,Fla.33138November27,1979AtomicSafetyLicensingandAppealBoardMichaelC.Farrar,Esq.,ChairmanRichardS.Salzman,Esq.Dr.W.ReedJohnsonIntheMatterofFloridaPowerandLightCompany(St.LucieNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2)DocketNo.50-389
{{#Wiki_filter:1131N.E.86StreetMiami,Fla.33138November27,1979AtomicSafetyLicensing andAppealBoardMichaelC.Farrar,Esq.,ChairmanRichardS.Salzman,Esq.Dr.W.ReedJohnsonIntheMatterofFloridaPowerandLightCompany(St.LucieNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2)DocketNo.50-389


==DearMembersoftheBoard,==
==DearMembersoftheBoard,==
IntervenorswishtoadvisethepartiesandmembersoftheBoardthatforgoodandsufficientreasontheypresentlywillnotbeabletopresentthedirecttestimonyofRobertPollardoftheUnionofConcernedScientistsatthehearingscheduledforDec.11,1979.Intervenorswillparticipateandwillpresenttheircasethroughcrossexaminationandinterrogatories.IntervenorshadadvisedcounselfortheStaffandtheapplicantinformallybytelephonepriortotheNov.16,1979deadlineforfilingwrittentestimony,thatthiswouldbethelikelyoutcomeofanyeffortbytheIntervenorstopresentMr.Pollard'stestimonyinadirectcase.TheIntervenor+furtheradvisedthepartiescounselthattheirdecisionnottopresentdirecttestimonywassubjecttoreviewuponexaminationoftestimonyofPatrickW.BaranowskytobefiledbytheStaffonNov.9,1979andwhichwasreceivedbytheIntervenorsforthefirsttimeFriday,Nov.16,1979.ThattestimonyisnowunderreviewbyIntervenors.Thesubjecttestimonyinvolvedprobabilisticanalysis.Inaddition,IntervenorspropoundtheattachedinterrogatoriestotheutilityinanefforttodevelopacompleterecordonFPL'shistoryofon-siteandoff-sitepoweravailabilitysoastoaid,theAppealBoardintheirdeliberationsontheseissues.Finally,INtervenorsareattemptingtoobtainthetestimonyofDaleBridenbaughofMBHAssociatesofSanJose,Californiasincehehasperformedananalysisofthesafetyimplicationsoftheproblemsassociatedwiththeon-sitepowerfailuresattheSt.LucieplantandMr.Baranowsky'sprobabilisticanalysistestimony.IfIntervenorsobtainMr.Bridenbaugh'sservicesitwillbetoolatetoprefilehistestimony.Therefore,inlieuofthattestimony,andfortheinformationoftheBoardandtheparties,theIntervenorsfileherewithanin-depthnewspaperarticletreatingMr.Bridenbagh',sviewsfromthePalmBeachPostTimesofOctober28,1979..  
Intervenors wishtoadvisethepartiesandmembersoftheBoardthatforgoodandsufficient reasontheypresently willnotbeabletopresentthedirecttestimony ofRobertPollardoftheUnionofConcerned Scientists atthehearingscheduled forDec.11,1979.Intervenors willparticipate andwillpresenttheircasethroughcrossexamination andinterrogatories.
Intervenors hadadvisedcounselfortheStaffandtheapplicant informally bytelephone priortotheNov.16,1979deadlineforfilingwrittentestimony, thatthiswouldbethelikelyoutcomeofanyeffortbytheIntervenors topresentMr.Pollard's testimony inadirectcase.TheIntervenor+
furtheradvisedthepartiescounselthattheirdecisionnottopresentdirecttestimony wassubjecttoreviewuponexamination oftestimony ofPatrickW.Baranowsky tobefiledbytheStaffonNov.9,1979andwhichwasreceivedbytheIntervenors forthefirsttimeFriday,Nov.16,1979.Thattestimony isnowunderreviewbyIntervenors.
Thesubjecttestimony involvedprobabilistic analysis.
Inaddition, Intervenors propoundtheattachedinterrogatories totheutilityinanefforttodevelopacompleterecordonFPL'shistoryofon-siteandoff-sitepoweravailability soastoaid,theAppealBoardintheirdeliberations ontheseissues.Finally,INtervenors areattempting toobtainthetestimony ofDaleBridenbaugh ofMBHAssociates ofSanJose,California sincehehasperformed ananalysisofthesafetyimplications oftheproblemsassociated withtheon-sitepowerfailuresattheSt.LucieplantandMr.Baranowsky's probabilistic analysistestimony.
IfIntervenors obtainMr.Bridenbaugh's servicesitwillbetoolatetoprefilehistestimony.
Therefore, inlieuofthattestimony, andfortheinformation oftheBoardandtheparties,theIntervenors fileherewithanin-depthnewspaper articletreatingMr.Bridenbagh',s viewsfromthePalmBeachPostTimesofOctober28,1979..  


Page2Farrar,Sazman,JohnsonNovember27,1979IthadbeenIntervenorsintentiontofilethisletterandaccompanyingInterrogatoriesbyMonday,Nov.19,1979butsomedelaywasoccasionedwhenIntervenorstypwriterbroke.orstruly,rtinH.HodderCounselforIntervenorsCCNormanA.CollHaroldF.ReisMilliamD.Paton N}}
Page2Farrar,Sazman,JohnsonNovember27,1979IthadbeenIntervenors intention tofilethisletterandaccompanying Interrogatories byMonday,Nov.19,1979butsomedelaywasoccasioned whenIntervenors typwriter broke.orstruly,rtinH.HodderCounselforIntervenors CCNormanA.CollHaroldF.ReisMilliamD.Paton N}}

Revision as of 18:25, 29 June 2018

Notifies That Intervenors Will Not Present Testimony of R Pollard of Ucs at 791211 Hearing.Forwards Newspaper Article Treating D Bridenbaugh Views Re Safety Implications of Power Failures,Since Prefiling Testimony Infeasible
ML17207A676
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/27/1979
From: HODDER M H
HODDER, M.H.
To: FARRAR M C, JOHNSON W R, SALZMAN R S
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML17207A677 List:
References
NUDOCS 7912270147
Download: ML17207A676 (4)


Text

1131N.E.86StreetMiami,Fla.33138November27,1979AtomicSafetyLicensing andAppealBoardMichaelC.Farrar,Esq.,ChairmanRichardS.Salzman,Esq.Dr.W.ReedJohnsonIntheMatterofFloridaPowerandLightCompany(St.LucieNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2)DocketNo.50-389

DearMembersoftheBoard,

Intervenors wishtoadvisethepartiesandmembersoftheBoardthatforgoodandsufficient reasontheypresently willnotbeabletopresentthedirecttestimony ofRobertPollardoftheUnionofConcerned Scientists atthehearingscheduled forDec.11,1979.Intervenors willparticipate andwillpresenttheircasethroughcrossexamination andinterrogatories.

Intervenors hadadvisedcounselfortheStaffandtheapplicant informally bytelephone priortotheNov.16,1979deadlineforfilingwrittentestimony, thatthiswouldbethelikelyoutcomeofanyeffortbytheIntervenors topresentMr.Pollard's testimony inadirectcase.TheIntervenor+

furtheradvisedthepartiescounselthattheirdecisionnottopresentdirecttestimony wassubjecttoreviewuponexamination oftestimony ofPatrickW.Baranowsky tobefiledbytheStaffonNov.9,1979andwhichwasreceivedbytheIntervenors forthefirsttimeFriday,Nov.16,1979.Thattestimony isnowunderreviewbyIntervenors.

Thesubjecttestimony involvedprobabilistic analysis.

Inaddition, Intervenors propoundtheattachedinterrogatories totheutilityinanefforttodevelopacompleterecordonFPL'shistoryofon-siteandoff-sitepoweravailability soastoaid,theAppealBoardintheirdeliberations ontheseissues.Finally,INtervenors areattempting toobtainthetestimony ofDaleBridenbaugh ofMBHAssociates ofSanJose,California sincehehasperformed ananalysisofthesafetyimplications oftheproblemsassociated withtheon-sitepowerfailuresattheSt.LucieplantandMr.Baranowsky's probabilistic analysistestimony.

IfIntervenors obtainMr.Bridenbaugh's servicesitwillbetoolatetoprefilehistestimony.

Therefore, inlieuofthattestimony, andfortheinformation oftheBoardandtheparties,theIntervenors fileherewithanin-depthnewspaper articletreatingMr.Bridenbagh',s viewsfromthePalmBeachPostTimesofOctober28,1979..

Page2Farrar,Sazman,JohnsonNovember27,1979IthadbeenIntervenors intention tofilethisletterandaccompanying Interrogatories byMonday,Nov.19,1979butsomedelaywasoccasioned whenIntervenors typwriter broke.orstruly,rtinH.HodderCounselforIntervenors CCNormanA.CollHaroldF.ReisMilliamD.Paton N