ML17215A847: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PROCEDURESGENERATION'PACKAGEST~LUCIEPLANTUNIT1ANDi]NIT2SIIjlUIllljI)PgggII'l[~IIPy,8504190313850412PDRADQCK05000335FPDR r>0 TABLEOFCONTENTSSection1~INTRODUCTION~~e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Pae~~~~11.1PURPOSE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~12~1.2SCOPE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o"~~~~~"o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ol1~3ORGANIZATIONAL'o~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~o~oo~o~~~~~~~~,~~~~~oo~~~~~~1PLANT-SPECIFICTECHNICALGUIDELINES'~.~...............~...~........22~1GENERAL..~~~.........~..................~~....~.~..........22.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTION........................................22~2~1MECHANICSOFCONVERSIONS'.~~~~~~~~~~~.~...~~~~.~~~~22.2.2DOCUMENTATION.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.32.2.3REVIEW........~~~.............~..............~~~~~~.32'.4INSTRUMENTATION6CONTROLSEVALUATION~~~e~~~~~~~~~~o33~WRITERSGUIDEFOREOPs~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~..~~~..~.~~~~~.~.83.1GENERAL~.~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~..~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~oo~e~~oo~.~..83.2DOCUMENTDESCRIPTION~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~o~~~~~~~o~~~.~.~~~~.84~EOPVERIFICATIONPROGRAM.~~~.~~~~~~~~.~~~~.~~~~~~~..~~~...~.~.~~~.94.1GENERAL~~~~~..~~~~~~~.~~~~~~.~.~~~.~.~~~~~~.~~~~.~~.~~~~~.~94.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTIONS'....~..~~~.~.~..~~.....~~~.........~.94.3OVERVIEWOFMETHODS~~~~...~~ooo~..~~.~~..ohio~.....~~~~~..~95.EOPVALIDATIONPROGRAM.~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e~~~.116.5l>WLT.1vENERAL~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~115.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTIONS'.o.~..~.............~.~~~~~~.~.~....115.3PROGRAMOVERVIEW.~...~~~~.~.~~.~.~........~.~~~~~~..~~~~~oll5~4SCENARIOS~o~~o~~~~o~oo~~~o~o~ooo~oo~ooo~o~oo~oooo~o~ooooo~12EOPTRAININGPROGRAM.~.~~~~.~.~.e.o~o~.~o~..~...~~...~~'.~...~~~136.16.26e3GOALS~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~13TRAININGMETHODIC.~.~~~~~~~~o~..........~~....~...~..~.~~136.2'CLASSROOMINSTRUCTION~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~136'2PROCEDUREWALKTHROUGHS~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.136''SIMULATOREXERCISES~~~o~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~.......14REFRESHERTRAINING'~o.~..~..~....~~..~..~~.~....~..~.....146.46.5~~~~~~~~~~~~e~14~~~~~~~~~~~~~~14~~~~o~~~~~~~~~14~~~~~~~~~~~~~~156.5.1SUPPORTINGTRAININGMATERIALCHANGES~6~5~2OPERATORFEEDBACK~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~TRAININGONREVISIONS~~.~~.~~.~...~.........INPUTSINTOTRAININGPROGRAMCHANGES~~~~~~~~
{{#Wiki_filter:PROCEDURES GENERATION
TABLEOFCONTENTSSection6~6~PaeEVALUATION~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ol5ATTACHMENT1ST~LUCIEPLANTWRITERSGUIDEFOREMERGENCYOPERATINGPROCEDURES~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~16 7J l.INTRODUCTION1~1PURPOSEThepurposeofthMProceduresGenerationPackage(PGP)istodescribetheemergencyoperatingprocedures(EOPs)developmentattheSt.LuciePlant,Unit1andUnit2CE-typepressurizedwaterreactor.1.2SCOPEThisdocumentwasdevelopedinresponsetoSupplement1toNUREG-0737,Item7.2b),page15..1,3,ORGANIZATIONThisdocumentconsistsofthefollowingsixparts:oIntroductionoPlant-SpecificTechnicalGuidelinesoWritersGuideforEOPsoEOPVerificationProgramoEOPValidationProgramoEOPTrainingProgramEachpartdescribestheapproachtakenaspartoftheoverallEOPImplementationPlanforSt.LuciePlant,Unit1andUnit2.PAGE I
'PACKAGEST~LUCIEPLANTUNIT1ANDi]NIT2SIIjlUIllljI)P gggII'l[~
2~PLANT-SPECIFICTECHNICALGUIDELINESF1GENERALThefollowingprogramforconvertingtheCombustionEngineeringEmergencyProcedureGuidelines(EPGs)intoEOPshasbeendevelopedandwillbeusedbySt.LuciePlantUnit1andUnit2~ThelatestapprovedrevisiontoCEN152willbeusedfortheinitiallyimplementedEOPs.Aslaterrevisionsareapproved,therevisedinformationwillbeincorporatedusingtheestablishedrevision,review,andapprovalprocess.Thefollowingmajoritemswereconsideredinthemethodologytobeused.omechanicsofconversionolocationoftheplant-specifictechnicalinformationohowtheplant-specifictechnicalinformationwillbeusedotheuseofoldEOPsodocumentationrequirementsouseofthebackgroundinformationsuppliedwithtechnicalguidelines2.2PROGRAHDESCRIPTION2~2.1MechanicsofConversion2~2.1.1PreparationThedesignatedEOPwritingteamwillobtainandreviewthefollowingplant-specifictechnicalinformation(EOPsourcedocuments):oCombustionEngineeringEPGs,Revision1,withbackgroundinformationoFSARUnit1andUnit2oSt.LuciePlantWritersGuideforEmergencyOperatingProcedures(Rev.2)oTechnicalSpecificationsforUnit1andUnit2othemostcurrentrevisionofexistingEOPsoas-builtplantdrawingsTheEOPsourcedocumentsarelocatedintheDocumentControlCenter.PAGE 2'.1.2WritingEOPsTheEOPwritingteamwillfollowtheEPGsstep"by"step,addingfootnotedinformationwheredesignated.Concurrently,thewriterswillreviewappropriateEOPsourcedocuments.ThePlant-SpecificTechnicalGuidelines(Figure1)willbecompletedduringthewritingoftheEOP.Thejustificationsectionwillbeusedtoprovidetheplant-specifictechnicalinformationoranalysistoassistintheverificationprocess.2.2.2DocumentationThecompletedFigure1(DocumentationSheet)willbeprovidedasasourcedocumenttoassistintheEOPverificationprocessandintherevision,review,andapprovalprocess.Anexampleofacompleted"StepDocumentation"sheetispresentedasFigure2,LOCAProcedure,Page2of4,comparingittotheequivalentEPGStepofPage5-72Step2a)2.2.3ReviewAreviewgroupwillreviewallEOPdraftsandFigure1todeterminetheapplicabilityofthegenerictechnicalguidelinestothespecificSt.Lucieunit~ThisgroupwillbecomposedofrepresentativesoftheI6CDepartment,OperationsDepartment,Engineering&HumanFactors,TechnicalDepartment,C.E.andotherdepartmentsastheproceduresrequire.SafetysignificantdeviationsoradditionstothegenericguidelineswillbeaddressedandresolvedthroughtheTechnicalDepartment.Aflowchart(Figure3)depictstheEOPdevelopmentandreviewpath.2.2.4InstrumentationandControlsEvaluationCombustionEngineeringwillconductafunction/taskanalysisofCEN-152fortheC-EOwner'sGroupthatwillidentifyinstrumentationandcontrolsonagenericplantbasis.PAGE 4
IIPy,8504190313 850412PDRADQCK05000335FPDR r>0 TABLEOFCONTENTSSection1~INTRODUCTION
FPLshallconductafunction/taskanalysisusingplant-specifictechnicalguidelines(CompletedDocumentationSheets,Figure4,QI5-PR/PSL-2)andcompletedEmergencyOperatingProcedures.ThemasterinstrumentationandcontrolsrequirementslistgeneratedbythetaskanalysislistedaboveWillbeincludedinthesupplementalDCRDRReport.PAGE DOCUATIONSHEET(PLANT-SPECIECHNICALGUIDELINES)EOPTitleEOPNumberPageRev.ofSTEPNUMBERCEN152EOPJUSTIFICATIONOFDIFFERENCESSIGNATUREIDATEPAGE-5-FIGURE1 DOCUMTIONSHEET(PLANT-SPECIFICHNICALGUIDELINES)EOPTitleEOPNumberXXRev.XPageof4"STEPNUMBEREPGPg.5-72STEP2aCEN152Ifpressurizerlevelisbetween[35"]and[245-].....EOPIfpressurizerlevelisbetween29/0and610/0....JUSTIFICATIONOFDIFFERENCESRewordedtoremovereferencetolevelininches.StLuciePlantlevelinstrumentsarecalibratedinpercentage.SIGNATURE/DATESP,.DOEPAGE-6-FIGURE2 EOPDEVELOPMENTandREVIEWPATHCEN-152FSARTECHNICALSPECIFICATIONSEXISTINGEOP'sPLANTDRAWINGSAUTHORWRITESDRAFTEOPANDCOMPIETESDOCUMENTATIONSHEETS(FIGURE1)DRAFTEOPDOCUMENTATIONSHEETSREVIEWGROUPREVIEWSDOCUMENTATIONSHEETSANDDRAFTEOPTOVERIFYTHATPLANT-SPECIFICINFORMATIONISCORRECTMEMBERSPLANTI&CPLANTOPERATIONSPLANTTECHNICALCEPROCEDURESGROUPFPLENGINEERINGHUMANFACTORSSUBCOMMITTEEREVIEWIN-PLANTREVIEWFORDEPARTMENTALCOMMENTSFRGREVIEWANDAPPROVALFIGURE3FAGE
~~e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Pae~~~~11.1PURPOSE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~12~1.2SCOPE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o"~~~~~"o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ol1~3ORGANIZATIONAL
'.WRITERSGUIDEFOREOPs3.1GENERALAwritersguideforEOPsisaplant-specificdocumentthatprovidesinstructionsforwritingEOPsusing'oodwritingprinciples.Inadditiontoestablishingsoundwritingprinciples,theguidehelpsto,promoteconsistencyamongallEOPsandtheirrevisio'ns,independentofthenumberofEOPwriters.Thewritersguidewillberevised,asnecessary,basedonfeedbackfromoperatortraining,experience,andvalidation.3.2DOCUMENTDESCRIPTIONInformationonthefollowingmajoritemsisincludedintheplant-specificwritersguideforEOPs:oEOPformatoEOPorganizationoEOPlevelofdetailoroleoftheEOPwithintheproceduresystemandnetworkoEOPcontentomechanicsofstyleTheSt.LuciePlantWritersGuideforEmergencyOperatingProcedures,Revision2isbasedontheindustrydocumentEmerenc0eratinProceduresWritingGuideline(INPO82-017),developedbytheEmergencyOperatingProceduresImplementationAssistance(EOPIA)ReviewGroupandpublishedbyINPO.TheSt.LuciePlantguideisprovidedasAttachmentl.PAGE 4~EOPVERIFICATIONPROGRAM4.1GENERALEOPverificationistheevaluationperformedtoconfirmthewrittencorrectnessoftheprocedureandtoensurethatapplicablegenericandplant-specifictechnicalinformationhasbeenincorporatedproperly.ThisevaluationalsochecksthatthehumanfactorsaspectspresentedinthewritersguideforEOPshavebeenapplied.4.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTIONWhendevelopingthisEOPverificationprogram,thefollowingmajoritemswereconsidered:ohowEOPverificationwillbeperformedohowcompletionoftheEOPverificationprocesswillbedocumentedowhatprocesswillbeusedinresolvingdiscrepancies4.3OVERVIEWOFMETHODSAlloftheverificationactivitiesare"tabletop"activ'ities.Theseactivitiesinvolvecomparingthe,emergencyoperatingprocedureswithrequirementsidentifiedinthereferencedocumentation.Verificationoftechnicalaccuracywillbedonebycomparingeachemergencyoperatingprocedurewiththeapplicablegenericandplant-specifictechnicalguidelines,andwithothersourcedatasuchastechnicalspecificationsandFinalUpdatedSafetyAnalysisReports.Achecklistwillbeusedtoensurethatkeypointsofcomparisonarecoveredconsistently.VerificationofwrittencorrectnesswillbedonebyreviewingeachpartofeachemergencyoperatingprocedureagainstachecklistofcriteriadrawnfromtheWriter'sGuide.TheverificationprogramisbasedontheindustrydocumentEmerenc0eratinProceduresVerificationGuideline(INPO83-004),developedbytheEOPIAReviewGroupandpublishedbyINPO.PAGE TheSt.LuciePlantverificationprocedureforemergencyoperatingproceduresshalladdressthefollowingobjectives:oEOPsaretechnicallycorrect,i.e.,~theyaccuratelyreflectthetechnicalguidelines=andotherEOPsourcedocuments.oEOPsarewrittencorrectly,i.e.,theyaccuratelyreflecttheplant-.specificwritersguide.oAcorrespondenceexistsbetweentheproceduresandthecontrolroom/planthardware.oThelanguageandlevelofinformationpresentedintheEOPsarecompatiblewiththequalifications,training,andexperienceoftheoperatingstaff.PAGE 5~EOPVALIDATIONPROGRAM5.1GENERALEOPvalidationistheevaluationperformedtodeterminethattheactionsspecifiedintheprocedurecanbeperformedbytheoperatortomanagetheemergencyconditionseffectively.ThemethodologyforEOPvalidationutilizespresent,availablemethodsattheSt.LuciePlantwhilerecognizingandallowingforfutureimprovements'heEOPvalidationwillevaluatetheoperators'bilitytomanageemergencyconditionsusingtheEOPs.ItwillvalidatethatpartoftheEOPnotcoveredbyanytechnicalvalidationofgenerictechnicalguidelines.5.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTIONWhendevelopingthisEOPvalidationprogram,thefollowingmajoritemswereconsidered:ohowEOPvalidationwillbeperformedohowto-appropriatelyusesimulators,walk-throughs,ortable-topmethodsofvalidationohowoperatingandtrainingexperiencewillbeintegratedintotheprogramevaluationotheevaluationcriteriatobeappliedandthemethodstobefollowedinresolvingdiscrepancies.ohowcompletionoftheEOPvalidationprocesswillbedocumented5.3PROGRAMOVERVIEWAllSt.LuciePlantEmergencyOperatingProceduresshallbevalidatedtoensuresatisfactionofthevalidationobjectivesusingthefollowingmethods:TableTopReviews,ControlRoomwalkthroughs,and/orSimulatorExercises.AllexerciseswillbeperformedtocomplywithminimumshiftcomplementasspecifiedinTechnicalSpecifications.Figure4identifieshoweachmethodsupportsachievementofthevalidationobjectives.Figure4alsoindicateshowthemeshingofthevalidationmethodsresultsinaprocedurewhichcaneffectivelymitigateemergencyconditions.Forinstance,thetabletopactivitycombinedwithacontrolroomwalk-throughresultsinathoroughevaluationoftheclarityofEOPinstructions.PAGE 5o4SCENARIOSScenariosshallbedevelopedforeachbasictypeofprocedurei.e.,LOCA,SGTR,ReactorTrip,e~~Criteriaforselectingscenariosshallinclude,butnotbelimitedto,theobjectivespresentedinFigure4~Scenariosshallbedevelopedformultiplefailuresbothconcurrentandsequential.PAGE FIGURE4VALIDATIONOBJECTIVESANDMETHODSVALIDATIONOBJECTIVESufficientInformationClearInstructionCorrectSequencesCorrectTimingEffectiveCommunicationsTABLETOPREVIEWPrimaryPrimary'VALIDATIONMETHODCONTROLROOMWALK-THROUGHPrimaryPartialSIMULATOREXERCISEPrimaryNOTE:XPrimaryPartialProvidesValidationInput~ProvidesPrimaryValidationInput~ProvidesPartialValidationInputPAGE TheprogramisbasedontheindustrydocumentEmerenc0eratinProceduresValidationGuideline(INPO83-006),developedbytheEOPIAReviewGroupandpublishedbyINPO.TheSt.LuciePlantvalidationprocedureforemergencyoperatingproceduresshalladdressthefollowingobjectives:oEOPsareusable,i.e.,theycanbeunderstoodandfollowedwithoutconfusion,delays,and'errors.oAcorrespondenceexistsbetweentheproceduresandthecontrolroom/planthardware.oTheinstructionspresentedintheEOPsarecompatiblewiththeshiftmanpower,qualifications,training,andexperienceoftheoperatingstaff.oAhighlevelofassuranceexiststhattheprocedureswillwork,i.e.,theproceduresguidetheoperatorinmitigatingtransientsandaccidents.PAGE 6~EMERGENCYOPERATINGPROCEDURESTRAININGPROGRAM(EOPT)6~1GOALSTheEOPTwillhaveasitsbasisthefollowinggoals:oToenabletheoperatorstounderstandthestructureoftheEOPs.oToenabletheoperatorstounderstandthetechnicalbasisoftheEOPs~oToenabletheoperatorstohaveaworkingknowledgeofthetechnicalcontentoftheEOPs.oToenabletheoperatortobeabletousetheEOPsunderoperationalconditions.oAlllicensedoperatorsshallbetrainedonallEOPspriortoEOPImplementation.Learningobjectiveswillbedevelopedtosupporteachofthesegoals6,2TRAININGMETHODSTheEOPTwillutilizevariouscombinationsofclassroominstruction,practicewalkthroughs,andsimulatorexercisesasappropriateforthelearningobjectives.6.2.1ClassroomInstruction~~Classroominstructionsessionwillincludeinformationonthefollowing:oTechnicalbases'oftheEOPsoTechnicalcontentoftheEOPsoStructureoftheEOPs6.2.2ProcedureWalkThroughsFamiliaritywithproceduralcontent,structure,andimplementationwillbegainedbyperformingpracticewalkthroughsinthecontrolroom.AlllicensedoperatorsshallwalkthroughtheStandardPostTripActionsandtheFunctionalRecoveryGuidelines.AlllicensedoperatorsshallwalkthroughtheOptimalRecoveryGuidelines.TwodifferentscenariosshallbeusedtoinitiatetheORG.PAGE 4Procedurewalkthroughsshallbeconductedsuchthatalllicensedoperatorsaccomplishallsteps.6.2.3SimulatorExercisesSimulatorpract1ceonperformingEOPswilloccurasapartofregularlyscheduledsimulatorrequalificationorhotlicensetraining.Scenarioswillbedevelopedtobeasspecificallyapplicableaspossibletothegenericsimulatornowbeingused.Proceduralpracticewillbestructuredsuchthatoperatorsareperformingtheirnormalcontrolroomfunctions.Untilaplantspecificsimulatorisavailable,complicatedscenarioswillbediscussedduringclassroominstructionorcontrolroomwalkthroughs.Multiplescenar1osshallbeuseditoexercisetheEOPs.6.3REFRESHERTRAININGAlllicensedoperatorswillconductproceduralwalkthroughsforrefreshertraining.Thewalkthroughsmaybeconductedeitherintheplantcontrolroomorthesimulator.Simulatorscenarioswillbeasdescribedin6.2.3above.Simulatorexerc1seswillbeevaluatedbytheTrainingstafforoperationssuperv1sion.Evaluationresultswillbecrit1quedforfeedbacktotheoperatorsandtodetermineadditionaltrainingneeds.6.4'RAININGONREVISIONSTOEOPs1TrainingonrevisionstoEOPswillbeaccomplishedthroughaprogramofrequiredreadings(selftaught),preshiftbriefings,orlecturesintherequalificat1onprogram.Determinationofappropriatemethodswillbemadebythetrainingstaff.6~5INPUTSINTOTRAININGPROGRAMCHANGES6.5.1SupportingTrainingMaterialChangesChangestosupportingtrainingmaterialwillbefactoredintoupdatedlessonplansandoperatormemos.PAGE 6.5.2OperatorFeedbackOperatorfeedbackresultingfromEOPverification,EOP,validation,andtrainingcritiqueformswillbeusedtokeepthetrainingprogramandEOPscurrentandrelevant.6~6EVALUATIONAneva'luationwillbeusedtoensurethatthetrainingprogramgoalshavebeenaccomplished.PAGE-17-}}
'o~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~o~oo~o~~~~~~~~,~~~~~oo~~~~~~1PLANT-SPECIFIC TECHNICAL GUIDELINES'~
.~...............
~...~........2 2~1GENERAL..
~~~.........
~..................
~~....~.~..........2 2.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTION........................................2 2~2~1MECHANICS OFCONVERSIONS'
.~~~~~~~~~~~.~...~~~~.~~~~22.2.2DOCUMENTATION.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.32.2.3REVIEW........
~~~.............
~..............
~~~~~~.32'.4INSTRUMENTATION 6CONTROLSEVALUATION
~~~e~~~~~~~~~~o33~WRITERSGUIDEFOREOPs~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~..~~~..~.~~~~~.~.83.1GENERAL~.~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~..~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~oo~e~~oo~.~..83.2DOCUMENTDESCRIPTION
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~o~~~~~~~o~~~.~.~~~~.84~EOPVERIFICATION PROGRAM.~~~.~~~~~~~~.~~~~.~~~~~~~..~~~...~.~.~~~.94.1GENERAL~~~~~..~~~~~~~.~~~~~~.~.~~~.~.~~~~~~.~~~~.~~.~~~~~.~94.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTIONS'
....~..~~~.~.~..~~.....~~~.........
~.94.3OVERVIEWOFMETHODS~~~~...~~ooo~..~~.~~..ohio~.....~~~~~..~95.EOPVALIDATION PROGRAM.~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e~~~.116.5l>WLT.1vENERAL~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~115.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTIONS'
.o.~..~.............
~.~~~~~~.~.~....115.3PROGRAMOVERVIEW.
~...~~~~.~.~~.~.~........~.~~~~~~..~~~~~oll5~4SCENARIOS
~o~~o~~~~o~oo~~~o~o~ooo~oo~ooo~o~oo~oooo~o~ooooo~12EOPTRAININGPROGRAM.~.~~~~.~.~.e.o~o~.~o~..~...~~...~~'.~...~~~136.16.26e3GOALS~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~13TRAININGMETHODIC.~.~~~~~~~~o~..........
~~....~...~..~.~~136.2'CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~136'2PROCEDURE WALKTHROUGHS~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.136''SIMULATOR EXERCISES
~~~o~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~.......14 REFRESHER TRAINING'
~o.~..~..~....~~..~..~~.~....~..~.....146.46.5~~~~~~~~~~~~e~14~~~~~~~~~~~~~~14~~~~o~~~~~~~~~14~~~~~~~~~~~~~~156.5.1SUPPORTING TRAININGMATERIALCHANGES~6~5~2OPERATORFEEDBACK~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~TRAININGONREVISIONS
~~.~~.~~.~...~.........
INPUTSINTOTRAININGPROGRAMCHANGES~~~~~~~~
TABLEOFCONTENTSSection6~6~PaeEVALUATION
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ol5ATTACHMENT 1ST~LUCIEPLANTWRITERSGUIDEFOREMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~16 7J l.INTRODUCTION 1~1PURPOSEThepurposeofthMProcedures Generation Package(PGP)istodescribetheemergency operating procedures (EOPs)development attheSt.LuciePlant,Unit1andUnit2CE-typepressurized waterreactor.1.2SCOPEThisdocumentwasdeveloped inresponsetoSupplement 1toNUREG-0737, Item7.2b),page15..1,3,ORGANIZATION Thisdocumentconsistsofthefollowing sixparts:oIntroduction oPlant-Specific Technical Guidelines oWritersGuideforEOPsoEOPVerification ProgramoEOPValidation ProgramoEOPTrainingProgramEachpartdescribes theapproachtakenaspartoftheoverallEOPImplementation PlanforSt.LuciePlant,Unit1andUnit2.PAGE I
2~PLANT-SPECIFIC TECHNICAL GUIDELINES F1GENERALThefollowing programforconverting theCombustion Engineering Emergency Procedure Guidelines (EPGs)intoEOPshasbeendeveloped andwillbeusedbySt.LuciePlantUnit1andUnit2~ThelatestapprovedrevisiontoCEN152willbeusedfortheinitially implemented EOPs.Aslaterrevisions areapproved, therevisedinformation willbeincorporated usingtheestablished
: revision, review,andapprovalprocess.Thefollowing majoritemswereconsidered inthemethodology tobeused.omechanics ofconversion olocationoftheplant-specific technical information ohowtheplant-specific technical information willbeusedotheuseofoldEOPsodocumentation requirements ouseofthebackground information suppliedwithtechnical guidelines 2.2PROGRAHDESCRIPTION 2~2.1Mechanics ofConversion 2~2.1.1Preparation Thedesignated EOPwritingteamwillobtainandreviewthefollowing plant-specifictechnical information (EOPsourcedocuments):
oCombustion Engineering EPGs,Revision1,withbackground information oFSARUnit1andUnit2oSt.LuciePlantWritersGuideforEmergency Operating Procedures (Rev.2)oTechnical Specifications forUnit1andUnit2othemostcurrentrevisionofexistingEOPsoas-builtplantdrawingsTheEOPsourcedocuments arelocatedintheDocumentControlCenter.PAGE 2'.1.2WritingEOPsTheEOPwritingteamwillfollowtheEPGsstep"by"step, addingfootnoted information wheredesignated.
Concurrently, thewriterswillreviewappropriate EOPsourcedocuments.
ThePlant-Specific Technical Guidelines (Figure1)willbecompleted duringthewritingoftheEOP.Thejustification sectionwillbeusedtoprovidetheplant-specific technical information oranalysistoassistintheverification process.2.2.2Documentation Thecompleted Figure1(Documentation Sheet)willbeprovidedasasourcedocumenttoassistintheEOPverification processandintherevision, review,andapprovalprocess.Anexampleofacompleted "StepDocumentation" sheetispresented asFigure2,LOCAProcedure, Page2of4,comparing ittotheequivalent EPGStepofPage5-72Step2a)2.2.3ReviewAreviewgroupwillreviewallEOPdraftsandFigure1todetermine theapplicability ofthegenerictechnical guidelines tothespecificSt.Lucieunit~Thisgroupwillbecomposedofrepresentatives oftheI6CDepartment, Operations Department, Engineering
&HumanFactors,Technical Department, C.E.andotherdepartments astheprocedures require.Safetysignificant deviations oradditions tothegenericguidelines willbeaddressed andresolvedthroughtheTechnical Department.
Aflowchart(Figure3)depictstheEOPdevelopment andreviewpath.2.2.4Instrumentation andControlsEvaluation Combustion Engineering willconductafunction/task analysisofCEN-152fortheC-EOwner'sGroupthatwillidentifyinstrumentation andcontrolsonagenericplantbasis.PAGE 4
FPLshallconductafunction/task analysisusingplant-specific technical guidelines (Completed Documentation Sheets,Figure4,QI5-PR/PSL-2) andcompleted Emergency Operating Procedures.
Themasterinstrumentation andcontrolsrequirements listgenerated bythetaskanalysislistedaboveWillbeincludedinthesupplemental DCRDRReport.PAGE DOCUATIONSHEET(PLANT-SPECI ECHNICALGUIDELINES)
EOPTitleEOPNumberPageRev.ofSTEPNUMBERCEN152EOPJUSTIFICATION OFDIFFERENCES SIGNATUREIDATE PAGE-5-FIGURE1 DOCUMTIONSHEET(PLANT-SPECIFI CHNICALGUIDELINES)
EOPTitleEOPNumberXXRev.XPageof4"STEPNUMBEREPGPg.5-72STEP2aCEN152Ifpressurizer levelisbetween[35"
]and[245-].....
EOPIfpressurizer levelisbetween29/0and610/0....JUSTIFICATION OFDIFFERENCES Rewordedtoremovereference tolevelininches.StLuciePlantlevelinstruments arecalibrated inpercentage.
SIGNATURE/DATE SP,.DOEPAGE-6-FIGURE2 EOPDEVELOPMENT andREVIEWPATHCEN-152FSARTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS EXISTINGEOP'sPLANTDRAWINGSAUTHORWRITESDRAFTEOPANDCOMPIETESDOCUMENTATION SHEETS(FIGURE1)DRAFTEOPDOCUMENTATION SHEETSREVIEWGROUPREVIEWSDOCUMENTATION SHEETSANDDRAFTEOPTOVERIFYTHATPLANT-SPECIFIC INFORMATION ISCORRECTMEMBERSPLANTI&CPLANTOPERATIONS PLANTTECHNICAL CEPROCEDURES GROUPFPLENGINEERING HUMANFACTORSSUBCOMMITTEE REVIEWIN-PLANTREVIEWFORDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTSFRGREVIEWANDAPPROVALFIGURE3FAGE
'.WRITERSGUIDEFOREOPs3.1GENERALAwritersguideforEOPsisaplant-specific documentthatprovidesinstructions forwritingEOPsusing'ood writingprinciples.
Inadditiontoestablishing soundwritingprinciples, theguidehelpsto,promoteconsistency amongallEOPsandtheirrevisio'ns, independent ofthenumberofEOPwriters.Thewritersguidewillberevised,asnecessary, basedonfeedbackfromoperatortraining, experience, andvalidation.
3.2DOCUMENTDESCRIPTION Information onthefollowing majoritemsisincludedintheplant-specific writersguideforEOPs:oEOPformatoEOPorganization oEOPlevelofdetailoroleoftheEOPwithintheprocedure systemandnetworkoEOPcontentomechanics ofstyleTheSt.LuciePlantWritersGuideforEmergency Operating Procedures, Revision2isbasedontheindustrydocumentEmerenc0eratinProcedures WritingGuideline (INPO82-017),developed bytheEmergency Operating Procedures Implementation Assistance (EOPIA)ReviewGroupandpublished byINPO.TheSt.LuciePlantguideisprovidedasAttachment l.PAGE 4~EOPVERIFICATION PROGRAM4.1GENERALEOPverification istheevaluation performed toconfirmthewrittencorrectness oftheprocedure andtoensurethatapplicable genericandplant-specif ictechnical information hasbeenincorporated properly.
Thisevaluation alsochecksthatthehumanfactorsaspectspresented inthewritersguideforEOPshavebeenapplied.4.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTION Whendeveloping thisEOPverification program,thefollowing majoritemswereconsidered:
ohowEOPverification willbeperformed ohowcompletion oftheEOPverification processwillbedocumented owhatprocesswillbeusedinresolving discrepancies 4.3OVERVIEWOFMETHODSAlloftheverification activities are"tabletop"activ'ities.
Theseactivities involvecomparing the,emergency operating procedures withrequirements identified inthereference documentation.
Verification oftechnical accuracywillbedonebycomparing eachemergency operating procedure withtheapplicable genericandplant-specific technical guidelines, andwithothersourcedatasuchastechnical specifications andFinalUpdatedSafetyAnalysisReports.Achecklist willbeusedtoensurethatkeypointsofcomparison arecoveredconsistently.
Verification ofwrittencorrectness willbedonebyreviewing eachpartofeachemergency operating procedure againstachecklist ofcriteriadrawnfromtheWriter'sGuide.Theverification programisbasedontheindustrydocumentEmerenc0eratinProcedures Verification Guideline (INPO83-004),developed bytheEOPIAReviewGroupandpublished byINPO.PAGE TheSt.LuciePlantverification procedure foremergency operating procedures shalladdressthefollowing objectives:
oEOPsaretechnically correct,i.e.,~theyaccurately reflectthetechnical guidelines=and otherEOPsourcedocuments.
oEOPsarewrittencorrectly, i.e.,theyaccurately reflecttheplant-.specificwritersguide.oAcorrespondence existsbetweentheprocedures andthecontrolroom/plant hardware.
oThelanguageandlevelofinformation presented intheEOPsarecompatible withthequalifications,
: training, andexperience oftheoperating staff.PAGE 5~EOPVALIDATION PROGRAM5.1GENERALEOPvalidation istheevaluation performed todetermine thattheactionsspecified intheprocedure canbeperformed bytheoperatortomanagetheemergency conditions effectively.
Themethodology forEOPvalidation utilizespresent,available methodsattheSt.LuciePlantwhilerecognizing andallowingforfutureimprovements'he EOPvalidation willevaluatetheoperators'bility tomanageemergency conditions usingtheEOPs.ItwillvalidatethatpartoftheEOPnotcoveredbyanytechnical validation ofgenerictechnical guidelines.
5.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTION Whendeveloping thisEOPvalidation program,thefollowing majoritemswereconsidered:
ohowEOPvalidation willbeperformed ohowto-appropriately usesimulators, walk-throughs, ortable-top methodsofvalidation ohowoperating andtrainingexperience willbeintegrated intotheprogramevaluation otheevaluation criteriatobeappliedandthemethodstobefollowedinresolving discrepancies
.ohowcompletion oftheEOPvalidation processwillbedocumented 5.3PROGRAMOVERVIEWAllSt.LuciePlantEmergency Operating Procedures shallbevalidated toensuresatisfaction ofthevalidation objectives usingthefollowing methods:TableTopReviews,ControlRoomwalkthroughs, and/orSimulator Exercises.
Allexercises willbeperformed tocomplywithminimumshiftcomplement asspecified inTechnical Specifications.
Figure4identifies howeachmethodsupportsachievement ofthevalidation objectives.
Figure4alsoindicates howthemeshingofthevalidation methodsresultsinaprocedure whichcaneffectively mitigateemergency conditions.
Forinstance, thetabletopactivitycombinedwithacontrolroomwalk-through resultsinathoroughevaluation oftheclarityofEOPinstructions.
PAGE 5o4SCENARIOS Scenarios shallbedeveloped foreachbasictypeofprocedure i.e.,LOCA,SGTR,ReactorTrip,e~~Criteriaforselecting scenarios shallinclude,butnotbelimitedto,theobjectives presented inFigure4~Scenarios shallbedeveloped formultiplefailuresbothconcurrent andsequential.
PAGE FIGURE4VALIDATION OBJECTIVES ANDMETHODSVALIDATION OBJECTIVE Sufficient Information ClearInstruction CorrectSequences CorrectTimingEffective Communications TABLETOPREVIEWPrimaryPrimary'VALIDATION METHODCONTROLROOMWALK-THROUGH PrimaryPartialSIMULATOR EXERCISEPrimaryNOTE:XPrimaryPartialProvidesValidation Input~ProvidesPrimaryValidation Input~ProvidesPartialValidation InputPAGE TheprogramisbasedontheindustrydocumentEmerenc0eratinProcedures Validation Guideline (INPO83-006),developed bytheEOPIAReviewGroupandpublished byINPO.TheSt.LuciePlantvalidation procedure foremergency operating procedures shalladdressthefollowing objectives:
oEOPsareusable,i.e.,theycanbeunderstood andfollowedwithoutconfusion, delays,and'errors.
oAcorrespondence existsbetweentheprocedures andthecontrolroom/plant hardware.
oTheinstructions presented intheEOPsarecompatible withtheshiftmanpower, qualifications,
: training, andexperience oftheoperating staff.oAhighlevelofassurance existsthattheprocedures willwork,i.e.,theprocedures guidetheoperatorinmitigating transients andaccidents.
PAGE 6~EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES TRAININGPROGRAM(EOPT)6~1GOALSTheEOPTwillhaveasitsbasisthefollowing goals:oToenabletheoperators tounderstand thestructure oftheEOPs.oToenabletheoperators tounderstand thetechnical basisoftheEOPs~oToenabletheoperators tohaveaworkingknowledge ofthetechnical contentoftheEOPs.oToenabletheoperatortobeabletousetheEOPsunderoperational conditions.
oAlllicensedoperators shallbetrainedonallEOPspriortoEOPImplementation.
Learningobjectives willbedeveloped tosupporteachofthesegoals6,2TRAININGMETHODSTheEOPTwillutilizevariouscombinations ofclassroom instruction, practicewalkthroughs, andsimulator exercises asappropriate forthelearningobjectives.6.2.1Classroom Instruction
~~Classroom instruction sessionwillincludeinformation onthefollowing:
oTechnical bases'oftheEOPsoTechnical contentoftheEOPsoStructure oftheEOPs6.2.2Procedure WalkThroughsFamiliarity withprocedural content,structure, andimplementation willbegainedbyperforming practicewalkthroughsinthecontrolroom.Alllicensedoperators shallwalkthroughtheStandardPostTripActionsandtheFunctional RecoveryGuidelines.
Alllicensedoperators shallwalkthroughtheOptimalRecoveryGuidelines.
Twodifferent scenarios shallbeusedtoinitiatetheORG.PAGE 4Procedure walkthroughsshallbeconducted suchthatalllicensedoperators accomplish allsteps.6.2.3Simulator Exercises Simulator pract1ceonperforming EOPswilloccurasapartofregularly scheduled simulator requalification orhotlicensetraining.
Scenarios willbedeveloped tobeasspecifically applicable aspossibletothegenericsimulator nowbeingused.Procedural practicewillbestructured suchthatoperators areperforming theirnormalcontrolroomfunctions.
Untilaplantspecificsimulator isavailable, complicated scenarios willbediscussed duringclassroom instruction orcontrolroomwalkthroughs.
Multiplescenar1os shallbeuseditoexercisetheEOPs.6.3REFRESHER TRAININGAlllicensedoperators willconductprocedural walkthroughsforrefresher training.
Thewalkthroughsmaybeconducted eitherintheplantcontrolroomorthesimulator.
Simulator scenarios willbeasdescribed in6.2.3above.Simulator exerc1ses willbeevaluated bytheTrainingstafforoperations superv1sion.
Evaluation resultswillbecrit1qued forfeedbacktotheoperators andtodetermine additional trainingneeds.6.4'RAINING ONREVISIONS TOEOPs1Trainingonrevisions toEOPswillbeaccomplished throughaprogramofrequiredreadings(selftaught),preshiftbriefings, orlecturesintherequalificat1on program.Determination ofappropriate methodswillbemadebythetrainingstaff.6~5INPUTSINTOTRAININGPROGRAMCHANGES6.5.1Supporting TrainingMaterialChangesChangestosupporting trainingmaterialwillbefactoredintoupdatedlessonplansandoperatormemos.PAGE 6.5.2OperatorFeedbackOperatorfeedbackresulting fromEOPverification, EOP,validation, andtrainingcritiqueformswillbeusedtokeepthetrainingprogramandEOPscurrentandrelevant.
6~6EVALUATION Aneva'luation willbeusedtoensurethatthetrainingprogramgoalshavebeenaccomplished.
PAGE-17-}}

Revision as of 17:10, 29 June 2018

Procedures Generation Package,St Lucie Plant,Unit 1 & Unit 2.
ML17215A847
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/12/1985
From:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17215A846 List:
References
PROC-850412, NUDOCS 8504190313
Download: ML17215A847 (24)
v • d • e


Text

PROCEDURES GENERATION

'PACKAGEST~LUCIEPLANTUNIT1ANDi]NIT2SIIjlUIllljI)P gggII'l[~

IIPy,8504190313 850412PDRADQCK05000335FPDR r>0 TABLEOFCONTENTSSection1~INTRODUCTION

~~e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Pae~~~~11.1PURPOSE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~12~1.2SCOPE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o"~~~~~"o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ol1~3ORGANIZATIONAL

'o~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~o~oo~o~~~~~~~~,~~~~~oo~~~~~~1PLANT-SPECIFIC TECHNICAL GUIDELINES'~

.~...............

~...~........2 2~1GENERAL..

~~~.........

~..................

~~....~.~..........2 2.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTION........................................2 2~2~1MECHANICS OFCONVERSIONS'

.~~~~~~~~~~~.~...~~~~.~~~~22.2.2DOCUMENTATION.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.32.2.3REVIEW........

~~~.............

~..............

~~~~~~.32'.4INSTRUMENTATION 6CONTROLSEVALUATION

~~~e~~~~~~~~~~o33~WRITERSGUIDEFOREOPs~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~..~~~..~.~~~~~.~.83.1GENERAL~.~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~..~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~oo~e~~oo~.~..83.2DOCUMENTDESCRIPTION

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~o~~~~~~~o~~~.~.~~~~.84~EOPVERIFICATION PROGRAM.~~~.~~~~~~~~.~~~~.~~~~~~~..~~~...~.~.~~~.94.1GENERAL~~~~~..~~~~~~~.~~~~~~.~.~~~.~.~~~~~~.~~~~.~~.~~~~~.~94.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTIONS'

....~..~~~.~.~..~~.....~~~.........

~.94.3OVERVIEWOFMETHODS~~~~...~~ooo~..~~.~~..ohio~.....~~~~~..~95.EOPVALIDATION PROGRAM.~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e~~~.116.5l>WLT.1vENERAL~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~115.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTIONS'

.o.~..~.............

~.~~~~~~.~.~....115.3PROGRAMOVERVIEW.

~...~~~~.~.~~.~.~........~.~~~~~~..~~~~~oll5~4SCENARIOS

~o~~o~~~~o~oo~~~o~o~ooo~oo~ooo~o~oo~oooo~o~ooooo~12EOPTRAININGPROGRAM.~.~~~~.~.~.e.o~o~.~o~..~...~~...~~'.~...~~~136.16.26e3GOALS~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~13TRAININGMETHODIC.~.~~~~~~~~o~..........

~~....~...~..~.~~136.2'CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~136'2PROCEDURE WALKTHROUGHS~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.136SIMULATOR EXERCISES

~~~o~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~.......14 REFRESHER TRAINING'

~o.~..~..~....~~..~..~~.~....~..~.....146.46.5~~~~~~~~~~~~e~14~~~~~~~~~~~~~~14~~~~o~~~~~~~~~14~~~~~~~~~~~~~~156.5.1SUPPORTING TRAININGMATERIALCHANGES~6~5~2OPERATORFEEDBACK~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~TRAININGONREVISIONS

~~.~~.~~.~...~.........

INPUTSINTOTRAININGPROGRAMCHANGES~~~~~~~~

TABLEOFCONTENTSSection6~6~PaeEVALUATION

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ol5ATTACHMENT 1ST~LUCIEPLANTWRITERSGUIDEFOREMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~16 7J l.INTRODUCTION 1~1PURPOSEThepurposeofthMProcedures Generation Package(PGP)istodescribetheemergency operating procedures (EOPs)development attheSt.LuciePlant,Unit1andUnit2CE-typepressurized waterreactor.1.2SCOPEThisdocumentwasdeveloped inresponsetoSupplement 1toNUREG-0737, Item7.2b),page15..1,3,ORGANIZATION Thisdocumentconsistsofthefollowing sixparts:oIntroduction oPlant-Specific Technical Guidelines oWritersGuideforEOPsoEOPVerification ProgramoEOPValidation ProgramoEOPTrainingProgramEachpartdescribes theapproachtakenaspartoftheoverallEOPImplementation PlanforSt.LuciePlant,Unit1andUnit2.PAGE I

2~PLANT-SPECIFIC TECHNICAL GUIDELINES F1GENERALThefollowing programforconverting theCombustion Engineering Emergency Procedure Guidelines (EPGs)intoEOPshasbeendeveloped andwillbeusedbySt.LuciePlantUnit1andUnit2~ThelatestapprovedrevisiontoCEN152willbeusedfortheinitially implemented EOPs.Aslaterrevisions areapproved, therevisedinformation willbeincorporated usingtheestablished

revision, review,andapprovalprocess.Thefollowing majoritemswereconsidered inthemethodology tobeused.omechanics ofconversion olocationoftheplant-specific technical information ohowtheplant-specific technical information willbeusedotheuseofoldEOPsodocumentation requirements ouseofthebackground information suppliedwithtechnical guidelines 2.2PROGRAHDESCRIPTION 2~2.1Mechanics ofConversion 2~2.1.1Preparation Thedesignated EOPwritingteamwillobtainandreviewthefollowing plant-specifictechnical information (EOPsourcedocuments):

oCombustion Engineering EPGs,Revision1,withbackground information oFSARUnit1andUnit2oSt.LuciePlantWritersGuideforEmergency Operating Procedures (Rev.2)oTechnical Specifications forUnit1andUnit2othemostcurrentrevisionofexistingEOPsoas-builtplantdrawingsTheEOPsourcedocuments arelocatedintheDocumentControlCenter.PAGE 2'.1.2WritingEOPsTheEOPwritingteamwillfollowtheEPGsstep"by"step, addingfootnoted information wheredesignated.

Concurrently, thewriterswillreviewappropriate EOPsourcedocuments.

ThePlant-Specific Technical Guidelines (Figure1)willbecompleted duringthewritingoftheEOP.Thejustification sectionwillbeusedtoprovidetheplant-specific technical information oranalysistoassistintheverification process.2.2.2Documentation Thecompleted Figure1(Documentation Sheet)willbeprovidedasasourcedocumenttoassistintheEOPverification processandintherevision, review,andapprovalprocess.Anexampleofacompleted "StepDocumentation" sheetispresented asFigure2,LOCAProcedure, Page2of4,comparing ittotheequivalent EPGStepofPage5-72Step2a)2.2.3ReviewAreviewgroupwillreviewallEOPdraftsandFigure1todetermine theapplicability ofthegenerictechnical guidelines tothespecificSt.Lucieunit~Thisgroupwillbecomposedofrepresentatives oftheI6CDepartment, Operations Department, Engineering

&HumanFactors,Technical Department, C.E.andotherdepartments astheprocedures require.Safetysignificant deviations oradditions tothegenericguidelines willbeaddressed andresolvedthroughtheTechnical Department.

Aflowchart(Figure3)depictstheEOPdevelopment andreviewpath.2.2.4Instrumentation andControlsEvaluation Combustion Engineering willconductafunction/task analysisofCEN-152fortheC-EOwner'sGroupthatwillidentifyinstrumentation andcontrolsonagenericplantbasis.PAGE 4

FPLshallconductafunction/task analysisusingplant-specific technical guidelines (Completed Documentation Sheets,Figure4,QI5-PR/PSL-2) andcompleted Emergency Operating Procedures.

Themasterinstrumentation andcontrolsrequirements listgenerated bythetaskanalysislistedaboveWillbeincludedinthesupplemental DCRDRReport.PAGE DOCUATIONSHEET(PLANT-SPECI ECHNICALGUIDELINES)

EOPTitleEOPNumberPageRev.ofSTEPNUMBERCEN152EOPJUSTIFICATION OFDIFFERENCES SIGNATUREIDATE PAGE-5-FIGURE1 DOCUMTIONSHEET(PLANT-SPECIFI CHNICALGUIDELINES)

EOPTitleEOPNumberXXRev.XPageof4"STEPNUMBEREPGPg.5-72STEP2aCEN152Ifpressurizer levelisbetween[35"

]and[245-].....

EOPIfpressurizer levelisbetween29/0and610/0....JUSTIFICATION OFDIFFERENCES Rewordedtoremovereference tolevelininches.StLuciePlantlevelinstruments arecalibrated inpercentage.

SIGNATURE/DATE SP,.DOEPAGE-6-FIGURE2 EOPDEVELOPMENT andREVIEWPATHCEN-152FSARTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS EXISTINGEOP'sPLANTDRAWINGSAUTHORWRITESDRAFTEOPANDCOMPIETESDOCUMENTATION SHEETS(FIGURE1)DRAFTEOPDOCUMENTATION SHEETSREVIEWGROUPREVIEWSDOCUMENTATION SHEETSANDDRAFTEOPTOVERIFYTHATPLANT-SPECIFIC INFORMATION ISCORRECTMEMBERSPLANTI&CPLANTOPERATIONS PLANTTECHNICAL CEPROCEDURES GROUPFPLENGINEERING HUMANFACTORSSUBCOMMITTEE REVIEWIN-PLANTREVIEWFORDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTSFRGREVIEWANDAPPROVALFIGURE3FAGE

'.WRITERSGUIDEFOREOPs3.1GENERALAwritersguideforEOPsisaplant-specific documentthatprovidesinstructions forwritingEOPsusing'ood writingprinciples.

Inadditiontoestablishing soundwritingprinciples, theguidehelpsto,promoteconsistency amongallEOPsandtheirrevisio'ns, independent ofthenumberofEOPwriters.Thewritersguidewillberevised,asnecessary, basedonfeedbackfromoperatortraining, experience, andvalidation.

3.2DOCUMENTDESCRIPTION Information onthefollowing majoritemsisincludedintheplant-specific writersguideforEOPs:oEOPformatoEOPorganization oEOPlevelofdetailoroleoftheEOPwithintheprocedure systemandnetworkoEOPcontentomechanics ofstyleTheSt.LuciePlantWritersGuideforEmergency Operating Procedures, Revision2isbasedontheindustrydocumentEmerenc0eratinProcedures WritingGuideline (INPO82-017),developed bytheEmergency Operating Procedures Implementation Assistance (EOPIA)ReviewGroupandpublished byINPO.TheSt.LuciePlantguideisprovidedasAttachment l.PAGE 4~EOPVERIFICATION PROGRAM4.1GENERALEOPverification istheevaluation performed toconfirmthewrittencorrectness oftheprocedure andtoensurethatapplicable genericandplant-specif ictechnical information hasbeenincorporated properly.

Thisevaluation alsochecksthatthehumanfactorsaspectspresented inthewritersguideforEOPshavebeenapplied.4.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTION Whendeveloping thisEOPverification program,thefollowing majoritemswereconsidered:

ohowEOPverification willbeperformed ohowcompletion oftheEOPverification processwillbedocumented owhatprocesswillbeusedinresolving discrepancies 4.3OVERVIEWOFMETHODSAlloftheverification activities are"tabletop"activ'ities.

Theseactivities involvecomparing the,emergency operating procedures withrequirements identified inthereference documentation.

Verification oftechnical accuracywillbedonebycomparing eachemergency operating procedure withtheapplicable genericandplant-specific technical guidelines, andwithothersourcedatasuchastechnical specifications andFinalUpdatedSafetyAnalysisReports.Achecklist willbeusedtoensurethatkeypointsofcomparison arecoveredconsistently.

Verification ofwrittencorrectness willbedonebyreviewing eachpartofeachemergency operating procedure againstachecklist ofcriteriadrawnfromtheWriter'sGuide.Theverification programisbasedontheindustrydocumentEmerenc0eratinProcedures Verification Guideline (INPO83-004),developed bytheEOPIAReviewGroupandpublished byINPO.PAGE TheSt.LuciePlantverification procedure foremergency operating procedures shalladdressthefollowing objectives:

oEOPsaretechnically correct,i.e.,~theyaccurately reflectthetechnical guidelines=and otherEOPsourcedocuments.

oEOPsarewrittencorrectly, i.e.,theyaccurately reflecttheplant-.specificwritersguide.oAcorrespondence existsbetweentheprocedures andthecontrolroom/plant hardware.

oThelanguageandlevelofinformation presented intheEOPsarecompatible withthequalifications,

training, andexperience oftheoperating staff.PAGE 5~EOPVALIDATION PROGRAM5.1GENERALEOPvalidation istheevaluation performed todetermine thattheactionsspecified intheprocedure canbeperformed bytheoperatortomanagetheemergency conditions effectively.

Themethodology forEOPvalidation utilizespresent,available methodsattheSt.LuciePlantwhilerecognizing andallowingforfutureimprovements'he EOPvalidation willevaluatetheoperators'bility tomanageemergency conditions usingtheEOPs.ItwillvalidatethatpartoftheEOPnotcoveredbyanytechnical validation ofgenerictechnical guidelines.

5.2PROGRAMDESCRIPTION Whendeveloping thisEOPvalidation program,thefollowing majoritemswereconsidered:

ohowEOPvalidation willbeperformed ohowto-appropriately usesimulators, walk-throughs, ortable-top methodsofvalidation ohowoperating andtrainingexperience willbeintegrated intotheprogramevaluation otheevaluation criteriatobeappliedandthemethodstobefollowedinresolving discrepancies

.ohowcompletion oftheEOPvalidation processwillbedocumented 5.3PROGRAMOVERVIEWAllSt.LuciePlantEmergency Operating Procedures shallbevalidated toensuresatisfaction ofthevalidation objectives usingthefollowing methods:TableTopReviews,ControlRoomwalkthroughs, and/orSimulator Exercises.

Allexercises willbeperformed tocomplywithminimumshiftcomplement asspecified inTechnical Specifications.

Figure4identifies howeachmethodsupportsachievement ofthevalidation objectives.

Figure4alsoindicates howthemeshingofthevalidation methodsresultsinaprocedure whichcaneffectively mitigateemergency conditions.

Forinstance, thetabletopactivitycombinedwithacontrolroomwalk-through resultsinathoroughevaluation oftheclarityofEOPinstructions.

PAGE 5o4SCENARIOS Scenarios shallbedeveloped foreachbasictypeofprocedure i.e.,LOCA,SGTR,ReactorTrip,e~~Criteriaforselecting scenarios shallinclude,butnotbelimitedto,theobjectives presented inFigure4~Scenarios shallbedeveloped formultiplefailuresbothconcurrent andsequential.

PAGE FIGURE4VALIDATION OBJECTIVES ANDMETHODSVALIDATION OBJECTIVE Sufficient Information ClearInstruction CorrectSequences CorrectTimingEffective Communications TABLETOPREVIEWPrimaryPrimary'VALIDATION METHODCONTROLROOMWALK-THROUGH PrimaryPartialSIMULATOR EXERCISEPrimaryNOTE:XPrimaryPartialProvidesValidation Input~ProvidesPrimaryValidation Input~ProvidesPartialValidation InputPAGE TheprogramisbasedontheindustrydocumentEmerenc0eratinProcedures Validation Guideline (INPO83-006),developed bytheEOPIAReviewGroupandpublished byINPO.TheSt.LuciePlantvalidation procedure foremergency operating procedures shalladdressthefollowing objectives:

oEOPsareusable,i.e.,theycanbeunderstood andfollowedwithoutconfusion, delays,and'errors.

oAcorrespondence existsbetweentheprocedures andthecontrolroom/plant hardware.

oTheinstructions presented intheEOPsarecompatible withtheshiftmanpower, qualifications,

training, andexperience oftheoperating staff.oAhighlevelofassurance existsthattheprocedures willwork,i.e.,theprocedures guidetheoperatorinmitigating transients andaccidents.

PAGE 6~EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES TRAININGPROGRAM(EOPT)6~1GOALSTheEOPTwillhaveasitsbasisthefollowing goals:oToenabletheoperators tounderstand thestructure oftheEOPs.oToenabletheoperators tounderstand thetechnical basisoftheEOPs~oToenabletheoperators tohaveaworkingknowledge ofthetechnical contentoftheEOPs.oToenabletheoperatortobeabletousetheEOPsunderoperational conditions.

oAlllicensedoperators shallbetrainedonallEOPspriortoEOPImplementation.

Learningobjectives willbedeveloped tosupporteachofthesegoals6,2TRAININGMETHODSTheEOPTwillutilizevariouscombinations ofclassroom instruction, practicewalkthroughs, andsimulator exercises asappropriate forthelearningobjectives.6.2.1Classroom Instruction

~~Classroom instruction sessionwillincludeinformation onthefollowing:

oTechnical bases'oftheEOPsoTechnical contentoftheEOPsoStructure oftheEOPs6.2.2Procedure WalkThroughsFamiliarity withprocedural content,structure, andimplementation willbegainedbyperforming practicewalkthroughsinthecontrolroom.Alllicensedoperators shallwalkthroughtheStandardPostTripActionsandtheFunctional RecoveryGuidelines.

Alllicensedoperators shallwalkthroughtheOptimalRecoveryGuidelines.

Twodifferent scenarios shallbeusedtoinitiatetheORG.PAGE 4Procedure walkthroughsshallbeconducted suchthatalllicensedoperators accomplish allsteps.6.2.3Simulator Exercises Simulator pract1ceonperforming EOPswilloccurasapartofregularly scheduled simulator requalification orhotlicensetraining.

Scenarios willbedeveloped tobeasspecifically applicable aspossibletothegenericsimulator nowbeingused.Procedural practicewillbestructured suchthatoperators areperforming theirnormalcontrolroomfunctions.

Untilaplantspecificsimulator isavailable, complicated scenarios willbediscussed duringclassroom instruction orcontrolroomwalkthroughs.

Multiplescenar1os shallbeuseditoexercisetheEOPs.6.3REFRESHER TRAININGAlllicensedoperators willconductprocedural walkthroughsforrefresher training.

Thewalkthroughsmaybeconducted eitherintheplantcontrolroomorthesimulator.

Simulator scenarios willbeasdescribed in6.2.3above.Simulator exerc1ses willbeevaluated bytheTrainingstafforoperations superv1sion.

Evaluation resultswillbecrit1qued forfeedbacktotheoperators andtodetermine additional trainingneeds.6.4'RAINING ONREVISIONS TOEOPs1Trainingonrevisions toEOPswillbeaccomplished throughaprogramofrequiredreadings(selftaught),preshiftbriefings, orlecturesintherequalificat1on program.Determination ofappropriate methodswillbemadebythetrainingstaff.6~5INPUTSINTOTRAININGPROGRAMCHANGES6.5.1Supporting TrainingMaterialChangesChangestosupporting trainingmaterialwillbefactoredintoupdatedlessonplansandoperatormemos.PAGE 6.5.2OperatorFeedbackOperatorfeedbackresulting fromEOPverification, EOP,validation, andtrainingcritiqueformswillbeusedtokeepthetrainingprogramandEOPscurrentandrelevant.

6~6EVALUATION Aneva'luation willbeusedtoensurethatthetrainingprogramgoalshavebeenaccomplished.

PAGE-17-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17215A847&oldid=749058"