Revision as of 14:39, 29 June 2018

Text

Rev 4 to Procedure QI-5-PSL-1, Preparation,Rev,Review/ Approval of Procedures.
	ML17229A593
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	09/26/1997
From:	SCAROLA J; FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML17229A591	List: ML17229A592; ML17229A593;
References
	QI-5-PSL-1, NUDOCS 9801230064
	Download: ML17229A593 (124)
	v • d • e

SOPSDATEDOCTPROCEDURE DOCNQI-5-PSL-1 SYSCOMPCOMPLETED ITM4FLORIDAPOWER&LIGHTST.LUCIEPLANTIIMFORMAYIOM

~5~"PP~Vill'VWiillll~

gyyBEFOREUSE.Ql-5-PSL-1 REVISION4F-BODED'.I",:E PPDDI.r-.,-PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES QUALITYINSTRUCTION PROCEDURE REVISIONREVIEWEDBYFRGON1/22/97&2/5/979/18/978C9/26/97APPROVEDBYJ.ScarolaPlantGeneralManagerJ.ScarolaPlantGeneralManagerDATE1/22/9782/5/979/26/97POPgoo++,980)0p-300gPCK05000335PDR980iaDeagrnent,INFORMATION SERVICESResponsible MPD09/29/97 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTTABLEOFCONTENTSPAGE:2of106SECTIONPAGE1.0TITLE.....

~.~.~52.0PURPOSE53.0COPE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~S~54.0RESPONSIBILITIES 64.1Author~...=........

~.~............

~~.~..4.2Department Head......

~...,.~......~~.~~.4.3EndUserVerifier......,.....

~..~...~~~..~4.4FacilityReviewGroup(FRG)4.5PlantGeneralManager4.6ServicesManager4.7SitePersonnel.......

~....~.........

~..~~4.8Subcommittee Reviewer...

~.....~...,~....,4.9Qualified Reviewer..............,,

.~.....~4.10TrainingManager........

~................

4.11SiteQualityAssurance ProgramReviewCommittee (QAPRC)Member.~........

~.~..~...~....4.12SiteQualityManager...,....~....~...~....667.-7~7771011115.0INSTRUCTIONS

............

~...........

~....~~~~~~~~~125.1Procedure Changes/Revisions 5.2Procedure Deletions..............

~...~.......~.5.3Procedure Upgrades/New Procedures..........

~....5.4Procedure Responsibility Transfers

....5.5PeriodicReviewofPlantProcedures 5.6Procedure Temporary Changes.~~..........

~~~5.7QualityAssurance ProgramChanges,Interdepartmental Procedure (IP)ChangesandNuclearPolicy(NP)Changes5.8Corr'ections toProcedure Typographical Errors5.9Processing NewGuidelines/Instructions

~~~...........

5.10Guideline/Instruction ChangesandRevisions..........

5.11LettersofInstruction (LOls)5.12Pre-Operational TestProcedure 5.13Pre-Implementation TrainingReview.....~..........

N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\~~~\~~~~~~~~~~12232534353738394146495557 REVIS1ONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 SECTIONPROCEDURE TlTLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTTABLEOFCONTENTSPAGE:3of106PAGE6.0RECORDSREQUIRED.~...~.....?.0REFERENCES APPENDICES

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5960APPENDIXADEFINITIONS

...............................

~.63APPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33(Appendix A)andNUREG-0?37

..............................

69APPENDIXCTHISPAGEWASINTENTIONALLY LEFTBLANK.......82APPENDIXDPROCEDURE CHANGEREQUEST.................

83/R4APPENDIXEUPGRADED/NEW PROCEDURE REQUESTFORM......

85APPENDIXFPROCEDURE COMMENTFORM...................

91APPENDIXGCOMPLETED PRE-OPERATIONAL TESTPROCEDURE FORM..~...~.....~.......~.....~.92APPENDIXHPRE-OPERATIONAL TESTSUMMARY~......~......~93APPENDIXILElTEROFINSTRUCT(ON REQUESTFORM......,..94APPENDIXJPERIODICREVIEWOFPLANTPROCEDURES

.....~.~96APPENDIXKPROCEDURE RESPONSIBIL)TY TRANSFER.........

~97APPENDIXLUFSARUSERCOMMENTFORM...............

~...98APPENDIXMNEWGUIDELINE/INSTRUCTION REQUEST~....~.~~~~99APPENDIXNGUIDELINE/INSTRUCTION CHANGEREQUEST~.....100APPENDIX0PRE-IMPLEMENTATION TRAININGNOTIFICATION FORM~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~101 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 FIGURESPROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTTABLEOFCONTENTSPAGE:4of106PAGEFIGURE1PROCEDURE CHANGEPROCESSFLOWPATH..~,.~.~102FIGURE2UPGRADED/NEW PROCEDURE PROCESSFLOWPATH.~103FIGURE3LETTEROFINSTRUCTION PROCESSFLOWPATH..~~.104FIGURE4PRE-OPERATIONAL TESTPROCEDURE PROCESSFLOWPATH105FIGURE5NEWGUIDELINE/INSTRUCTION PROCESSFLOWPATH...................................

106

-

REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:5of1061.0TITLEPREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES 2.0PURPOSE2.1ThisQualityInstruction (Ql)providesadministrative guidanceforthepreparation, review,approvalandrevisionofallguidelinesfinstructions andplantprocedures exceptEmergency Operating Procedures (EOPs).1.EOPsshallbeprocessed inaccordance withthefollowing applicable procedure(s);

A.Ql5-PR/PSL-2, Writer'sGuideforEmergency Operating Procedures.

B.Ql5-PR/PSL-3, Verification GuideforEmergency Operating Procedures.

C.Ql5-PR/PSL-4, Validation GuideforEmergency Operating Procedures.

D.Ql5-PR/PSL-6, Requirements forDevelopment andRevisionofEmergency Operating Procedures.

2.2ThisQldefinestheinstructions thatshallbeusedbySt.LuciePlantpersonnel toassureconformance withTechnical Specification 6.8.1.3.0SCOPE3.1ThisQlshallbeapplicable toallpersonnel involvedinpreparing, reviewing, approving andrevisingplantprocedures andguidelines/instructions foruseattheSt.LuciePlant.3.2ThisQlcontainsprocedure adherence expectations andmethodstobeusedbyallsitepersonnel.

3.3VendorTechnical ManualsareNOTwithinthescopeofthisprocedure.

RefertoADM-0010432, ControlofPlantWorkOrders./R4 REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:6of106'I-5-PSL-1

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

ST.LUCIEPLANT4.1AuthorTheAuthorisresponsible forresearching reference sources,verifying theaccuracyoftechnical information, draftingnewinstructions orrevisions whichareconsistent withADM-11.02, St.LucieProcedure

.Writer'sGuide,andobtaining reviewandapprovalinaccordance withthisQl~4.2Department Head1.EachDepartment Headisresponsible forthefollowing:

A.Determining iftheactivitytobeconducted requiresawrittenprocedure.

Ifaprocedure isrequired, theDepartment Headisresponsible forensuringaprocedure isissuedinaccordance withthisQl.B.Controlling anddistributing allguidelines/instructions whichapplytotheirdepartment.

IC.ThePeriodicReviewofprocedures, ensuringprocedures undertheirownership complywiththisQl.D.Therequiredtrainingofdepartment personnel onnewandrevisedprocedures priortotheirpersonnel performing activities specified inthesedocuments.

E.Reviewing themembership ofthesubcommittee toensuretheypossessequalorgreaterqualifications oftheAuthorforthesubjectmatterbeingevaluated.

F.Assigning aqualified individual toperformawalkdownofthedraftprocedure astheenduserveI'ifier.

REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:7of1064.0RESPONSIBILITIES (continued) 4.3EndUserVerifier1.TheEndUserVerifierwillperformawalkdownoftheprocedure instructions tovalidatethattheprocedure canbeimplemented aswritten.4.4FacilityReviewGroup(FRG)1.TheFRGisresponsible forthefollowing:

A.Reviewing procedures andguidelines/instructions inaccordance withthisQlandAP0010520,FacilityReviewGroup.B.Determining pre-implementation trainingrequirements, trainingpopulation andprocedure implementation dates.4.5PlantGeneralManagerThePlantGeneralManagerisresponsible forapproving eachprocedure andexemption fromFRGreview.4.6ServicesManager/R4TheServicesManagerisresponsible forthecoordination oftheactivities contained withinthisQI./R44.7SitePersonnel NOTEStockCodenumbersareprovidedinprocedures forreference information only.However,changestoStockCodenumbersusedinmaintenance activities shallmeettherequirements ofADM-0010432, ControlofPlantWorkOrders.1.Astrictadherence toprocedural/guideline requirements

-VerbatimCompliance

-isthepolicyexpectedandrequiredofallSt.LuciePlantpersonnel.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:8of1064.0RESPONSIBILITIES (continued) 4.7SitePersonnel (continued) 2.Adherence toProcedures andGuidelines A.Aprocedure orguideline/instruction shallbeperformed inastep-by-step manner,witheachstepbeingcompleted priortotheperformance ofthenextstep,unlessexceptions areallowedbytheprocedure orguideline/instruction, asspecified bythisprocedure.

1.Procedures orguidelines/instructions ofanAdministrative nature(Qls,ADMs,etc.)shallNOTbeviolated, butstep-by-step implementation mayNOTberequired.

By'ature, thesetypesofprocedures andguidelines/instructions oftendonotlendthemselves tosequential implementation, 2.Procedures orguidelines/instructions thatareofatechnical natureshallbefollowedsequentially exceptasspecifically allowedbyapprovedplantprocedures.

a.Requiredsign-offs anddataentriesshallbemadeaseachstepisperformed.

b.Ifaprocedure orguideline/instruction stepcanNOTbecompleted aswritten,orifinthejudgement oftheindividual performing aprocedure'or guideline/instruction, completion ofaspecificstep(s)couldresultinanunsafecondition (e.g.,personnel injury,damagetoequipment, conditions outsidethelimitsoftheprocedure orguideline/instruction),

conductoftheprocedure orguideline/instruction shallbestopped,andsupervision shallbenotified.

c.Deviation fromsystemvalvelineupsmaybemadeprovidedthedeviation isnotedininkontheapplicable valvealignment andisapproved(initialed anddated)bytheNuclearPlantSupervisor.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE No.:Ql-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:9of1064.0RESPONSIBILITIES (continued) 4.7SitePersonnel (continued) 2.Adherence toProcedures andGuidelines (continued)

B.Adherence toprocedures andguidelines shallbeaccomplished byuseofoneofthefollowing methods:Method1-Procedure orGuideline/Instruction PresentDurinPerformance ofActivit:Thetypesofprocedures thatshallbepresentandreferredtodirectlyare:a.Thosemaintenance procedures thatprovideguidanceforsurveillance/maintenance activities onSafety-Relatedequipment.

b.Thoseprocedures orguidelines/instructions developed forextensive orcomplexjobswhererelianceonmemorycanNOTbetrusted.c.Taskswhichareinfrequently performed.

d.Taskswhichmustbeperformed inaspecified sequenceand/orwhichverification isdocumented byinitialorsignature.

2.Method2-Memorization:

Methodbywhichtheprocedure orguideline/instruction stepsfortherequiredactionsarecommitted tomemory.ThismethoddoesNOTpermitanydeviation fromtheProcedural Adherence Policy.a.Procedures forwhichactionsshouldbecommitted tomemoryareOperatorActionsinEmergency Operating Procedures andOffNormalProcedures.

b.Procedures orguidelines/instructions forwhichactionsmaybecommitted tomemoryareroutineprocedural actionsthatarefrequently repeatedandmayNOTrequiretheprocedure guideline/instruction tobepresentduringperformance oftheactivity.

However,copiesofprocedures orguidelines/instructions shallbeavailable totheuserattheworklocationforreference duringperformance ofthetask,ifnecessary.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:10of1064.0RESPONSIBILITIES (continued) 4.7.SitePersonnel (continued) 2.Adherence toProcedures andGuidelines (continued)

C.Procedural adherence maybeaccomplished byuseofaTemporary Changeorcorrection toatypographical errorifnecessary.

D.Whenusedinaprocedure theword:~shallisusedtodenotearequirement.

~shouldisusedtodenotearecommendation.

~mayisusedtodenotepermission, neitherarequirement norarecommendation.

E.Independent Verification:

'I.Independent Verification hasbeendefinedinADM-17.06, Independent Verification.

Definitions ofIndependent Verification shouldnotbeaddedtoprocedures astheymayconflictwiththeguidanceoutlinedinADM-17.06.

4.8Subcommittee Reviewer1~TheSubcommittee Reviewerisresponsible forensuringatechnical reviewisconducted forprocedures andguidelines/instructions.

Thisreviewshallincludethefollowing:

A.Compliance withtherespective department requirements B.Accomplishing theintendedpurposeinasafemannerC.Technical accuracyD.Effectonplantequipment orpersonnel E.Verification thataproposedguideline/instruction meetsthecriteriaforaguideline/instruction 0

REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:11of1064.0RESPONSIBILITIES (continued) 4.8Subcommittee Reviewer(continued) 2.TheSubcommittee Reviewerisresponsible forresolving allreviewcommentswiththeprocedure author.4.9Qualified ReviewerNOTEAnyQualified

Reviewer, regardless ofwhethertheyaretheAuthor,Subcommittee orDepartment Head,mayperforma50.59review.1.TheQualified Reviewerisresponsible fordetermining whetherornotproposedprocedures andguidelines/instructions constitute achangetothesystemoperating procedures asdescribed bytheUFSARandTechnical Specifications.

4.10TrainingManager1.TheTrainingManagershallassistthesubcommittee reviewinfieldtestingontrainingdepartment simulators ormock-ups, asrequested.

2.TheTrainingManagerisresponsible forscreening procedure changesfortrainingprogramrelevance.

4.11SiteQualityAssurance ProgramReviewCommittee (QAPRC)MemberTheSiteQAPRCMembershallensureallsiteDepartment Headsreceive,fortheirreview,significant changestotheQualityAssurance ManualthatmayaffectsiteQlswhichareundertheirjurisdiction.

4.12SiteQualityManagerTheSiteQualityManagerensuresthatprocedures receiveQualityAssurance/Quality Controlreview,asappropriate, inaccordance withNuclearAssurance Qls/Technique Sheets.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:Ql-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:12of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS 5.1Procedure Changes/Revisions NOTE~Figure1showstheprocedure changeprocessinflowpathform.~AppendixDandFareusedtodocumentthisprocess.1.TheAuthorofaprocedure changeshallperformthefollowing:

A.Obtainacompletecopyofthecurrentrevisionoftheprocedure.

NOTEHighlighters, correction fluidoranyotherobliteration materialshallNOTbeusedtomarkaprocedure forrevisionpurposes.

B.Clearlydenotetheapplicable changestotheprocedure asfollows:Markthroughtheapplicable words,letters,numbers,sentences orparagraphs whicharetobechangedwithasingleREDline.2.LegiblywritethechangesontotheaffectedpageinREDink.Thesechangesmaybeindicated withacloudandcross-hatching, withthecontentswrittenoverandNOTobliterated (stilllegible).

3.Ifrequired, usenotationsymbolstoreference acommitment ordirection intheleftcolumnnexttotheaffectedstep.Seedefinition ofnotationsymbolsinAppendixA.4.Ifextensive additions arerequired, useadditional sheetsasnecessary.

Clearlyindicatetheproperplacement ofthechangesontheappropriate pageoftheoldrevision.

C.Reviewtheentireprocedure toensureitisNOTinconflictwiththeproposedchanges.

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:13of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.1Procedure Changes/Revisions (continued)

TheAuthorofaprocedure changeshallperformthefollowing:

(continued)

D.CompleteAuthorblocks1through6onAppendixD,Procedure ChangeRequest./R4NOTEIfrequested, theAuthorshallmakeavailable afullcopyoftheprocedure totheSubcommittee reviewer(s) andtheDepartment Head.E.Summarize theproposedchangesandreasonforthechangesonAppendixD,block4.Thisblockshallbecompleted.

F.Ifareviewoftheprocedure hasbeenperformed utilizing thecriterialistedinAppendixJ,andallapplicable changeshavebeenmade,thencheckperiodicreviewboxinAppendixD,block2.NOTECopiesofthePCRpackagemaybemadetodistribute asnecessary.

TheAuthorshouldmaintaincontroloftheoriginalPCRpackageandobtainsignatures ontheoriginalAppendixDuponcommentresolution.

G.AttachtheAppendixDtothemarkedupprocedure toformthePCRpackage.H.TheAuthorshallobtainthefollowing applicable reviewsandensureeachreviewisdocumented onaformsimilartotheProcedure CommentForm,AppendixF:1.ObtainQAreviewiftheprocedure isaQlorAdministrative procedure.

2.ObtainQCreviewiftheprocedure isaMaintenance procedure.

REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:14of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.1Procedure Changes/Revisions (continued) 1.TheAuthorofaprocedure changeshallperformthefollowing:

(continued)

H.(continued) 3.ObtainChemicalControlSupervisor reviewifthisprocedure changereferences anynewchemical.

4.ObtainEngineering reviewifthisprocedure changealterstheorderofinitiating signalsofatest.5.ObtainOperations SupportSupervisor reviewifthisprocedure changedeletesorchangesaprocedure number.6.ObtainNuclearBusinessUnitJointSafetyCommittee (NBUJSC)Reviewifthisprocedure changeaffectstheclearance procedure.

7.Verifythatanyapplicable PC/Ms,SafetyEvaluations, orrevisions thereof,havebeenreviewedbytheFRGandapprovedbythePGMifthePCRisbeinggenerated asaresultofaPC/MorSafetyEvaluation.

I.TheAuthorshallselectaQualified Reviewer(seeAppendixA)toperforma10CFR50.59screening oftheproposedchange.2.TheQualified Reviewershallperformthefollowing:

A.Performa10CFR50.59screening inaccordance withADM-17.11, 10CFR50.59Screening.

Uponcompletion, attachthedocumented resultstotheassociated PCRpackage./R4/R4 REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:15of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.1Procedure Changes/Revisions (continued) 2.TheQualified Reviewershallperformthefollowing:

(continued)

NOTEUFSARerrorsorimprovements includedifferences betweenproceduralized operating andmaintenance practices andsimilaractivities referenced intheUFSAR.B.IfaUFSARerrororimprovement suggestion isdiscovered, theQualified ReviewershallsubmitaUFSARUserCommentForm,similartoAppendixL,toSiteEngineering forprocessing andgenerateaCondition Reportinaccordance withAP0006130,Condition Reports,asnecessary.

C.Uponcompletion, returnPCRpackageand10CFR50.59screening resultstotheAuthor.IfNOTinconcurrence withtheproposedchange,documentreasonforunacceptability onAppendixF./R4NOTE~ifappropriate, theAuthormayselectmorethanonesubcommittee reviewer.

~Eachdepartment affectedbytheproposedchangeshouldhavetheopportunity tosubcommittee thechange.3.TheAuthorshalldetermine therequiredsubcommittee reviewer(s),

basedonaffecteddepartment(s) andend-user(s).

4.Iftheprocedure changeinvolvesaPlantPolicyPSL-105issue,followthatpolicy'srequirements forsubcommittee review.I5.ForwardcopiesofthePCRpackage(s) totheselectedSubcommittee reviewer(s) forreview.

0 REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:16of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.1Procedure Changes/Revisions (continued)

NOTESelectedSubcommittee Reviewer(s) shallhavequalifications whichareequivalent to,orgreaterthan,thoseoftheAuthorintherelevantsubjectmatter.6.TheSubcommittee reviewer(s) shallperformanindependent technical reviewoftheprocedure changetoensuretheproposedchange:A.Isreviewedforpotential adverseimpactonplantpersonnel

=and/orequipment.

B.Istechnically accurate.

C.Isinagreement withtheUFSAR.D.Includesreference marksofallcommitments andreferences nexttotheapplicable stepsandintheReference sectioninaccordance withADM-11.02, St.LucieProcedure Writer'Guide.E.Iscompatible withthereferenced plantconditions.

F.Requiresproperimplementation ofIndependent Verification inaccordance withADM-17.06, Independent Verification.

G.Requiresproperimplementation ofHealthPhysicsprecautions andpolicies.

H.Requirescompliance withtheFPLNuclearDivisionSafeWorkPractices manual.I.Iftheproposedchangeistoanupgradedprocedure, theSubcommittee reviewer(s) shallensurethechangeisconsistent withthefollowing:

1~ADM-11.02, St.LucieProcedure Writer'sGuide2.Organizational Qls REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:17of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANT5.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.1Procedure Changes/Revisions (continued) 7.TheSubcommittee reviewer(s) shalldocumenttheirreviewonaformsimilartoAppendixF,Procedure CommentForm,andattachtoPCRpackage.8.TheAuthorshallresolveallcommentsfromthesubcommittee reviewer(s),

andincorporate anyadditional requiredchangestotheprocedure orconsultwiththeresponsible Department Headtoresolvedisagreements.

A.Whenobtaining resolution toareviewer's comment,theauthorofthechangeshallensurethateachdepartment affectedbyorresponsible forimplementing theresolution isnotifiedofandconcurswiththecommentresolution.

Insomecases,theaffecteddepartment mayrequirethechangeandcommentresolution toberoutedbackthroughtheirdepartment foranadditional review.9.TheAuthorshallforwardthePCRpackagetotheresponsible Procedure Groupforreview.A.Ifsignature isrequiredduringoff-hours, theAuthormayobtainapprovalperteleconasfollows;'t.Recordthefollowing information inBlock8ontheProcedure ChangeRequest,aformsimilartoAppendixD:/R4a.Nameofthepersoninitiating theteleconandthepersoncontacted/approving thePCR(i.e.,JoeSmithforTomKlein).b.Dateandtimeoftelecon.2.ForwardacopyofthePCRtothepersonwhoapprovedthetelecon.3.Theapproving personshallreviewthePCRthenextworkingdayand,ifrequired, makeanychangestotheprocedure inaccordance withQI-5-PSL-1.

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:18of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.1Procedure Changes/Revisions (continued) 9.TheAuthorshallforwardthePCRpackagetotheresponsible Procedure Groupforreview.(continued)

B.Theresponsible Procedure GroupReviewershallreviewthePCRasfollows:Verifyalldepartments affectedbyorresponsible forimplementing theproposedchangehavereviewedandapprovedthechange.2.Verifytheinstructions andformatareincompliance withADM-11.02, St.LucieProcedure Writer'sGuide.3.DocumentanycommentsonaformsimilartoAppendixFandforwardthecommentsbacktotheAuthor.4.Uponapproval, signanddateBlock8ontheProcedure ChangeRequest,aformsimilartoAppendixD./R4NOTEInformation Servicesshouldbecontacted forresponsible Department Head/Procedure Groupdetermination.

10.TheAuthorshallforwardtheoriginalPCRpackage(alongwithallcommentforms)totheresponsible Department Headforreview.11.TheDepartment Headshallperformthefollowing:

A.ReviewthePCRpackageandanswerthequestions inBlock12onAppendixD.B.Reviewtheprocedure pre-implementation trainingrequirements ofsection5.13ofthisQlandcompleteAppendix0,Pre-Implementation TrainingNotification Form,ifrequired.

REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:19of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.1Procedure Changes/Revisions (continued) 11.TheDepartment Headshallperformthefollowing:

(continued)

NOTEWheneverfeasible, multiplechangesareincorporated intoonerevisionandsomeofthelargerprocedures areprocessed onaquarterly basis.C.Ifinconcurrence withtheproposedchange,assignapriorityin~block9onAppendixD.1.PRIORITY1Requiredtomeethighpriorityregulatory commitments aswellasimmediate plant/operational needssuchasSNOwork.Changesarerequiredforsafeorcontinued operation ofplant.Normalprocessing timeafterFRGreview-undertwoweeks.2.PRIORITY2Requiredtomeetcommitments andmanagement directives wherethereisanallowance formoreleadtime.Normalprocessing timeafterFRGreview-twoweeks,3.PRIORITY3Routinechanges,scheduled work,incorporation ofexistingtemporary changes,etc.Normalprocessing timeafterFRGreview-3weeks.4.PRIORITY4Lowprioritywork,(incorporating lessonslearnedfromoutage,minoreditorial changes).

Normalprocessing timeafterFRGreview-4weeks.

REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:20of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.1Procedure Changes/Revisions (continued) 1I.TheDepartment Headshallperformthefollowing:

(continued)

D.SignanddateDepartment Headapprovalinblock9onAppendixD.E.IfNOTinconcurrence withtheproposedchange,documentreasonforunacceptability onAppendixF.F.ReturnthePCRpackagetotheAuthor.12.TheAuthorshallforwardthePCRpackagetotheInformation ServicesDepartment fortrackingandscheduling forFRG.CAUTIONTheprocedures trackingsystemutilizedbyInformation Servicesalsotracksspecialprocedure reviewcommitments (e.g.,aprocedure mayrequireaparticular manager's signature, QAreview,completion ofaHumanFactorsreview,priortoFRGreview).Bypassing thisadministrative reviewisNOTsuggested (walk-ins toFRG)~NOTEInsituations ofheightened

priority, theprocedure changeeffortshouldbecoordinated withInformation Services-Procedures

Tracking, ifpossible.

13.TheInformation ServicesDepartment shallperformthefollowing:

A.Performanadministrative reviewoftheprocedure package.B.LogthePCRpackageintothetrackingsystem.C.WordprocessthePCR,ifdesired,atthistime.D.PlacethePCRpackageontheFRGagendaforFRGreview.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:21of106Ql-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.1Procedure Changes/Revisions (continued) 14.TheFRGshallperformthefollowing:

A.Reviewsubmitted PCRpackage.B.Reviewandevaluatethepre-implementation trainingrecommendation (Appendix 0)andinitiateappropriate pre-implementation trainingrequirements perSection5.13.C.Afterreview,theFRGChairmanshallrecommend approvalbyinitialling block10onAppendixD.15.ThePlantGeneralManagershallreviewtheFRGminutes.Ifheconcurswiththerecommendations oftheFRG,heshallsigntheminutesindicating hisapproval.

16.AfterPGMapprovaltheFRGSecretary shallentertheapprovaldateinblock11onAppendixD.17.Theinformation ServicesDepartment shallperformthefollowing:

A.Produceanoriginalcopyoftherevisedprocedure.

B.Includerevisionmarkstomarkchangesconspicuously toalerttheuser.C.Notifytheresponsible department whenwordprocessing iscomplete.

18.Theresponsible department shallassignanindividual toproofread thewordprocessed procedure, priortotheProcedure Production Groupsubmitting theprocedure toDocumentControlfordistribution.

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:22of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.1Procedure Changes/Revisions (continued) 19.TheInformation ServicesDepartment shallperformthefollowing:

A.Ifpre-implementation trainingisrequired, theprocedure willbeplacedonholduntiltrainingiscompleteinaccordance withSection5.13.B.ForwardthecompletePCRpackagetoDocumentControl.20.DocumentControlshalldistribute therevisedprocedure inaccordance withQl6-PR/PSL-1, DocumentControl~21.TheapprovedPCRpackageshallbeforwarded toNuclearRecordsVaulttobemaintained intheplantfilesperQl17-PR/PSL-1, QualityAssurance Records.ENDOFSECTION5.I REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE No.:Ql-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:23of1065.0iNSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.2Procedure Deletions NOTEFigure1showstheprocessinflowpathform.~AppendixDisusedtodocumentthisprocess.~Procedure deletionpackagesshallbesubmitted withtherequestpackageforanyprocedure thatissuperseding theapplicable activityorsubjectmatter.TheAuthorofaprocedure deletionshallperformthefollowing:

A.Obtainthecoversheetofthemostcurrentrevisionandwritethewords"DELETEENTIREPROCEDURE" acrossthefrontofthisfirstpage(inREDink)andsubmitwiththePCRpackage.B.Usethesameprocessflowasdelineated insection5.1(Procedure Changes).

C.RequesttheInformation ServicesDepartment toperformawordsearchtoidentifyotherprocedures thatreference theprocedure tobedeleted.D.Reviewtheprocedures identified bythewordsearchtodetermine theimpactofthesubjectprocedure deletionontheaffectedprocedures.

E.PreparePCR(s)toreviseanyprocedure(s) forwhichthesubjectdeletionaffectsexecution oftheprocedure.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:24of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.2Procedure Deletions (continued) 1.(continued)

NOTEIftheprocedure beingdeletedisincludedinanotherprocedure simplyasareference andtheexecution oftheprocedure isnotimpacted, thereference maybecorrected byusingtheprocessforcorrecting typographical errorsoutlinedinSection5.8.3.F.PCRsforprocedures inwhichexecution hasbeenaffectedbytheprocedure deletionandchangesbeingprocessed astypographical errorsshallbesubmitted toInformation Servicesatthetimeofthesubmittal forFRGreviewoftheinitiating procedure deletion.

Theintentisthatallaffectedprocedures bechangedsimultaneously tomaintainconfiguration control.ENDOFSECTION5.2 REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:25of106Ql-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANT6.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.3Procedure Upgrades/New Procedures NOTEThegoalofanupgradedprocedure istohaveatechnically accurateandimplementable document.

Thisprocessisdetailedandmethodical

~Themethodstoaccomplish anerror-free documentshallutilizeoneormoreofthefollowing techniques fordevelopment andreview:~TableTopDiscussion

~FieldWalk-downs

~Taskperformance usingtrainingdevicessuchassimulators ormock-ups.

~Allnewprocedures shallbewrittenintheupgradedformatcontained inADM-11.02, St.LucieProcedure Writer'sGuide.~Figure2showsUpgraded/New Procedure processinflowpathform.~AppendixEandAppendixFareusedtodocumentthisprocess.~Personnel writingneworupgradedprocedures shouldrouteacopyofanewdrafttotheProcedure Development Grouppriortosubcommittee reviewforscreening ofADM-11.02 requirements.

'1.TheAuthorofaprocedure upgrade/new procedure shallperformthefollowing:

A.ObtainacopyofaformsimilartoAppendixEUpgraded/New Procedure Request(UPR)Form.B.Obtainanewprocedure numberfromtheInformation ServicesDepartment.

C.Writeatechnically accuratedraftoftheupgradedornewprocedure basedontheresultsoftabletopdiscussions, fieldwalk-downs and/ortaskperformance usingtrainingdevicessuchassimulators ormock-ups.

D.Completeblocks1through3oftheAppendixEform,andattachtheformtotheUpgraded/New Procedure.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:26of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.3Procedure Upgrades/New Procedures (continued) 2.TheAuthorshallobtainthefollowing applicable reviewsandensureeachreviewisdocumented onaformsimilartotheProcedure CommentForm,AppendixF:A.ObtainQAreviewiftheprocedure isaQlorAdministrative procedure.

B.ObtainQCreviewiftheprocedure isaMaintenance procedure.

C.ObtainChemicalControlSupervisor reviewifthisprocedure changereferences anynewchemical.

D.ObtainEngineering reviewifthisprocedure changealterstheorderofinitiating signalsofatest.E.ObtainOperations SupportSupervisor reviewifthisprocedure changedeletesorchangesaprocedure number.F.ObtainNuclearBusinessUnitJointSafetyCommittee (NBUJSC)Reviewifthisprocedure changeaffectstheclearance procedure.

3.TheAuthorshallselectaQualified Reviewer(seeAppendixA)toperforma10CFR50.59screening oftheproposedchange,4.TheQualified Reviewershall:/R4A.Performa10CFR50.59screening inaccordance withADM-17.11, 10CFR50.59Screening.

Uponcompletion, attachthedocumented resultstotheassociated PCRpackage./R4 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:27of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.3Procedure Upgrades/New Procedures (continued) 4.TheQualified Reviewershall:(continued)

NOTEUFSARerrorsorimprovements includedifferences betweenproceduralized operating andmaintenance practices andsimilaractivities referenced intheUFSAR.B.IfaUFSARerrororimprovement suggestion isdiscovered, theQualified ReviewershallsubmitaUFSARUserCommentForm,similartoAppendixL,toSiteEngineering forprocessing andgenerateaCondition Reportinaccordance withAP0006130,Condition Reports,asnecessary.

C.IfNOTinconcurrence withtheproposeddraft,documentreasonforunacceptability onAppendixF.D.Uponcompletion, returntheUPRpackageandthe10CFR50.59screening resultstotheAuthor./R45.TheAuthorshalldetermine themembership ofthesubcommittee.

A.Thesubcommittee minimumquorumshallconsistofoneofthefollowing inthepriorityorderlistedbelow:1.ASystemEngineer(ifasystemorcomponent isaffected)

OR2.ATechnical ExpertonthesubjectmaterialOR3.ATrainingDepartment SubjectMatterExpert(SME)B.Iftheprocedure affectsotherdepartments, ensuretheyareincludedasaSubcommittee Reviewer.

REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:28of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.3Procedure Upgrades/New Procedures (continued) 5.TheAuthorshalldetermine themembership ofthesubcommittee (continued)

C.TheAuthorshalldistribute toeachSubcommittee RevieweraUPRpackageconsisting ofthefollowing:

Adraftcopyoftheupgradedprocedure clearlymarkedDRAFT.2.AcopyofaformsimilartoAppendixFwiththetopsectioncompleted.

3.AcopyofaformsimilartoAppendixE.6.TheSubcommittee Reviewershallperformthefollowing:

A.Performaseparateandindependent technical reviewoftheprocedure.

B.DocumentreviewonaformsimilartoAppendixF,Procedure CommentForm,andattachformstoPCR.NOTEThetabletopmethodisthepreferred method,howeverareviewandresolution oftheAppendixFcommentsisacceptable.

7.Uponcompletion ofthesubcommittee review,theAuthorshould,facilitate atabletopreviewoftheprocedure utilizing allsubcommittee reviewers.

8.TheAuthorshallforwardthepackagetotheEndUserDepartment Headtofacilitate awalkdownoftheprocedure withanEndUsertoensurethattheprocedure isimplementable byperforming thefollowing:

A.TheEndUserandtheAuthorshallwalkdowntheprocedure inthefield,traininglaborsimulator, asappropriate.

B.Anycommentsshouldbedocumented onaformsimilartoAppendixF.

REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:Ql-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:29of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.3Procedure Upgrades/New Procedures (continued)

NOTEEndUserwalkdowncanbefacilitated byuseoftrainingmock-ups, simulator facilities, simulated actionsintheplant,concurrent performance withapprovedprocedures/NPWOs/LOls ortable-top, asbestapplicable.

S.TheEndUsershallperformthefollowing:

A.Walkdowntheinstructions oftheprocedure tovalidatethat-theinstructions areinthecorrectsequence.

B.Verifyallplantlabelsarecorrectly referenced intheinstructions.

C.Verifyallsafetyhazardsandprecautions areaddressed.

D.VerifyallRadiation Protection issuesareaddressed.

E.Signblock5ofAppendixEtodocumentthewalkdown.

F.ReturntheUPRpackagetotheAuthor.10.TheAuthorshallforwardtheUPRpackagetotheresponsible Procedure Groupforreview.Theresponsible Procedure GroupReviewershallperformthe-following:

A.Verifyalldepartments affectedbyorresponsible forimplementing theupgraded/new procedure havereviewedandapprovedthechange.B.Verifytheupgraded/new procedure packageconformstotherequirements ofQI-5-PSL-1.

C.Documentanycommentson.aformsimilartoAppendixFandforwardthecommentsbacktotheAuthor.D.Uponapproval, signanddateBlock6onaformsimilartoAppendixEandreturnpackagetoAuthor.

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:30of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.3Procedure Upgrades/New Procedures (continued) 12.TheAuthorshallforwardtheoriginalUPRpackagetotheresponsible Department Headforreview.13.TheDepartment Headshallperformthefollowing:

A.Reviewtheprocedure andtheUPRpackage.B.ResolveanycommentswiththeAuthorandsignAppendixF,Procedure CommentForm,ifresolution isrequired.

C.Assesstheneedforpre-implementation trainingbyperforming thefollowing; 1.Reviewtheprocedure pre-implementation requirements ofsection5.13ofthisQlandcompleteAppendix0ifapplicable.

2.Answerthequestions inblock7onAppendixE.D.Checktheapplicable priorityblockinblock7onAppendixEindicating thelevelofattention theUPRpackageistobegiven.1.PRIORITY1Requiredtomeethighpriorityregulatory commitments aswellasimmediate plant/operational needssuchasSNOoutagework.Procedure isrequiredforsafeorcontinued operation ofplant.Normalprocessing timeafterFRGreview-undertwoweeks.(Consideration ofaTCmaybeanecessary alternative.)

2.PRIORITY2Requiredtomeetcommitments andmanagement directives wherethereisanallowance formoreleadtime.Normalprocessing timeafterFRGreview-twoweeks.

REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:31of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.3Procedure Upgrades/New Procedures (continued) 13.TheDepartment Headshallperformthefollowing:

(continued)

D.(continued) 3.PRIORITY3Routineprocedures, scheduled work,incorporation ofexistingtemporary changes,etc.Normalprocessing timeafterFRGreview-3weeks.4.PRIORITY4Lowprioritywork,(incorporating lessonslearnedfromoutage).Normalprocessing timeafterFRGreview-4weeks.E.IfNOTinconcurrence withtheproposeddraft,documentreasonforunacceptability onAppendixF.F.IndicateapprovaloftheUPRbysigningblock7onAppendixE.G.ReturntheUPRpackagetotheAuthor.14.TheAuthorshallforwardtheUPRpackagetotheInformation ServicesDepartment fortrackingandscheduling forFRG.15.TheInformation ServicesDepartment shallperformthefollowing:

A.Enternewprocedure intheTrackingSystem.B.Wordprocessnew/upgraded procedure.

C.Uponcompletion ofwordprocessing, placetheUPRpackageontheFRGagenda.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:32of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.3Procedure Upgrades/New Procedures (continued) 16.TheFRGshallperformthefollowing:

,A.ReviewtheUPRpackage.B.Reviewandevaluatethepre-implementation trainingrecommendation (Appendix 0)andinitiateappropriate pre-implementation trainingrequirements perSection5.13,C.Afterreview,theFRGChairmanshallrecommend approvalbyinitialling block8onAppendixE.17.ThePlantGeneralManagershallreviewtheFRGminutes.Ifheconcurswiththerecommendations oftheFRG,heshallsigntheminutesindicating hisapproval.

18.AfterPGMapprovaltheFRGSecretary shallentertheapprovaldateinblock9onAppendixE.19.TheInformation ServicesDepartment shallperformthefollowing:

A.Produceanoriginalcopyoftheupgraded/new procedure.

B.Notifytheresponsible department whenwordprocessing iscomplete.

20.Theresponsible department shallassignanindividual toproofread thewordprocessed procedure, priortotheProcedure Production Groupsubmitting theprocedure toDocumentControlfordistribution.

21.TheInformation ServicesDepartment shallperformthefollowing:

IA.Ifpre-implementation trainingisrequired, theprocedure willbeplacedonholduntiltrainingiscompleteinaccordance withthisQl.B.ForwardthecompleteUPRpackagetoDocumentControl.

REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAI OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:33of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.3Procedure Upgrades/New Procedures (continued) 22.DocumentControlshalldistribute theprocedure inaccordance withQl6-PR/PSL-1, DocumentControl~23.TheapprovedUPRpackageshallbeforwarded toNuclearRecordsVaulttobemaintained intheplantfilesinaccordance withQl17-PR/PSL-1, QualityAssurance Records.ENDOFSECTION5.3 REVIStONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE T!TLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:34of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.4Procedure Responsibility Transfers NOTEAppendixKisusedtodocumentthisprocess.Iftheprocedure typeandnumbering willremainthesame,performthefollowing:

A.TheCurrentResponsible Department Headshallperformthefollowing:

Documentthetransferofresponsibility foraprocedure fromonedepartment toanotherusingAppendixK.2.Provideareasonfortransferring theresponsibility intheReasonForRequestboxonAppendixK.3.Signforresponsibility transferonAppendixK.B.TheNewResponsible Department Headshallperformthefollowing:

Signforaccepting theresponsibility transferonAppendixK.2.ForwardAppendixKtotheInformation ServicesDepartment.

C.TheInformation ServicesDepartment shallmodifytrackingsystemtoreflectthetransferofresponsibility.

2.IftheProcedure Typeandnumberischanging, performthefollowing:

A.TheCurrentResponsible Department Headordesigneeshalldeletetheapplicable procedure inaccordance withsection5.2.B.TheNewResponsible Department HeadordesigneeshallsubmitanAppendixEwiththeapplicable procedure toinitiateaNewProcedure.

ENDOFSECTION5.4 REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:35of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.5PeriodicReviewofPlantProcedures NOTE~AppendixJisusedtodocumentthisprocess.~OnlyPeriodicReviewsresulting inachangearerequiredtobereviewedbytheFRG.Allprocedures shallbereviewedatleastonceeach36months(30to42months)toassuretheyrepresent currentplantpolicyandpractice.

2.TheInformation ServicesDepartment shallcoordinate'his effortasfollows:A.Trackingeachprocedure's periodicreviewstatus.B.Providing theresponsible Department Headwithastatusofthereviewsforwhichheisaccountable.

C.Generating amonthlystatusreporttobeissuedtoplantdepartments.

3.ThePeriodicReviewershallperformthefollowing:

A.DocumentthereviewusingAppendixJ,PeriodicReviewofPlantProcedures, asfollows:Thoroughly reviewtheentireprocedure.

NOTEUFSARerrorsorimprovements includedifferences betweenproceduralized operating andmaintenance practices andsimilaractivities referenced intheUFSAR.2.IfaUFSARerrororimprovement suggestion isdiscovered, theQualified ReviewershallsubmitaUFSARUserCommentForm,similartoAppendixL,toSiteEngineering forprocessing andgenerateaCondition Reportinaccordance withAP0006130,Condition Reports,ifapplicable.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:Ql-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:36of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.5PeriodicReviewofPlantProcedures (continued) 4.Iftheprocedure requiresachangetomeettheAppendixJcriteriaperformthefollowing:

A;Revisetheprocedure inaccordance withthisQl,Section5.1.B.AttachAppendixJtoAppendixDorAppendixE,(whichever isused),forFRGreviewandPGMapproval.

5.Theresponsible Department Headshallperformthefollowing:

A.Approvethereviewbysigningthecompleted AppendixJ.B.Forwardthecompleted AppendixJtotheInformation ServicesDepartment ifchangestotheprocedure areNOTrequired.

ENDOFSECTION5.5 REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:Ql-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:37of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.6Procedure Temporary Changes1.Temporary changestoprocedures shallbeprocessed inaccordance withADM-11.03, Temporary ChangetoProcedures.

ENDOFSECTION5.6 REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:38of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.7QualityAssurance ProgramChanges,Interdepartmental Procedure (IP)ChangesandNuclearPolicy(NP)ChangesTheSiteQualityAssurance ProgramReviewCommittee (QAPRC)Membershallperformthefollowing:

A.Reviewallrevisions totheFPLQualityAssurance Manual,NuclearDivisionIPsandNuclearPolicies.

B.NotifyallaffectedDepartment Headsofsignificant changestotheQualityAssurance Program,NPsandIPs.2.TheaffectedDepartment Headshallperformthefollowing; A.Uponreceiptofnotification fromtheSiteQAPRCMember,determine ifrevisionofaQlassignedtotheirdepartment isrequired..

B.Reviewotherdepartment procedures affectedbytheQAProgram,IPorNPchangetodetermine revisionrequirements.

C.EnsurethatifrevisionofaQlorotherprocedure isrequired, aProcedure ChangeRequestispreparedandsubmitted forapprovalwithin60daysoftheissuanceoftheQualityAssurance Manualrevision, IPrevisionorNPrevision.

D.IfaProcedure ChangeRequestresulting fromaQAProgramchangecannotbesubmitted within60days,aplanofactionshallbesubmitted totheSiteQualityManagerwithin60daysoftheissuanceoftheQualityAssurance Manualrevision.

ENDOFSECTION5.7 REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:39of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.8Corrections toProcedure Typographical ErrorsCorrections totypographical errorsmaybeprocessed withoutgenerating aProcedure ChangeRequestiftheerrorsfollowtheexampleslistedbelow:~Misspellings (e.g.,"adn"insteadof"and")~Incorrect sequenceofstepnumbers(e.g.,"6.3.1,6.3.3,6.3.2"insteadof"6.3.1,6.3.2,6.3.3")~Incorrect pagenumbersintheheadersandattachments (e.g.,"PAGE82of80"insteadof"PAGE82of82")~Errorsinreferences (e.g.,astepreferences aprocedure sectionthatisanobvioustypographical error)~Errorsinvalvenumbersorbreakernumbers.Theseerrorswillbecorrected iftheyareVERIFIEDandthenewdescription fitstheapplication (e.g.,HCV-3645, MOVforLPSIto1B1Header,insteadofHCV-3635).

~Missingsign-offs whichwereobviously intendedtobeinthedocument.

2.Errorsinsetpoints, measurements, orquantitative acceptance criteriashallNOTbeconsidered atypographical error,andshallrequire,ataminimum,aPCRorTC.AP0006130,Condition Reports,shallbeconsulted todetermine ifaCRisrequired.

3.Changestoreferenced procedure numbers,procedure titles,organizational namesorpositiontitlesmaybemadeinaffectedprocedures uponFRGapprovalofatleastoneinitiating PCRwhichdescribes thechange.ThisinitialPCRshouldcontainthelistofallprocedures beingrevise'dunderthisprovision.

Thesechangesintheprocedures whichcontainthereferences maybeprocessed as"typographical errors"inaccordance withthissection.Changesbeingprocessed astypographical errorsshallbesubmitted atthetimeoftheinitiating procedure change.'he intentisthatallaffectedprocedures bechangedsimultaneously inordertomaintainconfiguration control.

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:40of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.8Corrections toProcedure Typographical Errors(continued) 4.Tocorrectatypographical error:A.Thesupervisor responsible fortheworkshallverifytheprocedure clearlycontainsatypographical errorandshallhandwrite thecorrection intheprocedure, Thecorrection shallbeinitialed anddatedbythesupervisor.

B.Uponcompletion oftheworkactivity, thesupervisor shallidentifythecorrection viaawrittenmemoorelectronic mailtotheInformation ServicesSupervisor.

APCRisNOTrequired.

C.TheInformation ServicesSupervisor shallauthorize thecorrection oftheerror,correctthecomputerized versionoftheprocedure, andissuethecorrection inatimelymannerinaccordance withQl6-PR/PSL-1, DocumentControl~ENDOFSECTION5.8 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE No.:Ql-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:41of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.9Processing NewGuidelines/Instructions NOTE~Figure5showstheprocessinflowp'athform.~Appendices BandMareneededforthisprocess.1.TheAuthorshallperformthefollowing:

A.Determine ifthedocumentmeetsthefollowing guideline/instruction criteria:

ThedocumentisNOTaprocedure asdescribed inthe=UFSAR.RefertoAppendixAforthedefinition ofa"procedure asdescribed intheUFSAR."2.ThedocumentisNOTaprocedure asdescribed inT.S.6.8.1.RefertoAppendixAforthedefinition ofaprocedure.

B.CompletetheAuthorsectionofaformsimilartoAppendixMandattachittothedocument.

C.Obtainguideline/instruction numberfromtheInformation ServicesDepartment.

D.SelectaQualified Reviewertoperforma10CFR50.59screening ofthenewGuideline/Instruction.

2.TheQualified Reviewershall:/R4A.Performa10CFR50.59screening inaccordance withADM-17.11, 10CFR50.59Screening.

Uponcompletion, attachthedocumented resultstotheassociated newguideline/instruction package./R4 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:42of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.9Processing NewGuidelines/Instructions (continued) 2.TheQualified Reviewershallperformthefollowing:

(continued)

B.Reviewthedocumenttoverifythatitmeetstheguideline/instruction criteriaasfollows:EnsurethedocumentisNOTaprocedure asdescribed intheUFSAR.RefertoAppendixAforthedefinition of"procedure asdescribed intheUFSAR."2.EnsurethedocumentisNOTaprocedure asdescribed inT.S.6.8.1.RefertoAppendixAforthedefinition ofaprocedure.

C.IfaUFSARerrororimprovement suggestion isdiscovered, theQualified ReviewershallsubmitaUFSARUserCommentForm,similartoAppendixL,toSiteEngineering forprocessing andgenerateaCondition Reportinaccordance withAP0006130,Condition Reports,ifapplicable.

D.SignAppendixMtoindicateconcurrence.

E.Uponcompletion, returnthenewguideline/instruction packageandthe10CFR50.59screening resultstotheAuthorforadditional processing.

/R43.TheAuthorshallperformthefollowing:

A.Determine thesubcommittee membership.

B.Obtainsubcommittee reviews.C.Iftheguideline/instruction affectsotherdepartments, ensuretheyareincludedassubcommittee reviewers.

REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:43of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.9Processing NewGuidelines/Instructions (continued) 4.TheSubcommittee shallperformthefollowing:

A.Reviewthedocumenttoverifythatitmeetstheguideline/instruction criteriaasfollows:EnsurethedocumentisNOTaprocedure asdescribed intheUFSAR.RefertoAppendixAforthedefinition of"procedure asdescribed intheUFSAR."2.EnsurethedocumentisNOTaprocedure asdescribed inT.S.6.8.1.RefertoAppendixAforthedefinition ofaprocedure.

B.Reviewthedocumentfortechnical accuracy.

C.DocumentcommentsonaformsimilartoAppendixF,D.Uponapproval, returnentirepackagetotheAuthor./R45.TheAuthorshallforwardthenewGuideline/Instruction totheresponsible Department Head.6.Theresponsible Department Headshallperformthefollowing:

A.Reviewthedocumenttoverifyitmeetstheguideline/instruction criteriaasfollows:EnsurethedocumentisNOTaprocedure asdescribed intheUFSAR.RefertoAppendixAforthedefinition of"procedure asdescribed intheUFSAR."2.EnsurethedocumentisNOTaprocedure asdescribed inT.S.6.8.1.RefertoAppendixAforthedefinition ofaprocedure.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:44of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.9Processing NewGuidelines/Instructions (continued) 6.(continued)

B.Reviewthedocumentfortechnical accuracy.

C.SignAppendixMtoindicateconcurrence.

D.ForwardthepackagetoInformation Servicesfortracking.

7.TheInformation ServicesDepartment shalllogandpreparetheguideline/instruction forFRGreview.8.TheFRGshallperformthefollowing:

A.Reviewthedocumenttoverifythatitmeetstheguideline/instruction criteria.

B.Recommend tothePGMapprovalofthisdocumentasaguideline/instruction byinitialing AppendixM.9.ThePlantGeneralManagershallreviewtheFRGminutes.Ifheconcurswiththerecommendations oftheFRG,heshallsigntheminutesindicating hisapproval.

10.TheInformation ServicesDepartment shallperformthefollowing:.

A.Coordinate theissuanceofguidelines withthedeletionnoticesofexistingprocedures ifnecessary.

B.WordprocessRevision0guidelinefinstruction.

C.Returnguideline/instruction totheapplicable department.

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:45of106QI-5-PSL-1

6.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.9Processing NewGuidelines/Instructions (continued) 11.TheDepartment Headshallperformthefollowing:

A.Determine ifpre-implementation trainingisrequiredbysubsection 5.13.1.Ifpre-implementation trainingisrequired, performthefollowing:

a.CompleteandattachAppendixO.b.Ensuretheguideline/instruction isplacedonholduntiltrainingiscompleted inaccordance withdepartmental trainingplans,ifappropriate.

B.Approvetheguideline/instruction anddocumentthisbysigningthecoversheetoftheoriginalguideline/instruction.

C.Controlanddistribute thenewguideline/instruction.

D.Ensureanyguideline/instruction whichaffectsaccredited trainingprogramsisroutedtotheTrainingDepartment library.E.Ensureacopyoftheguideline/instruction changepackageisroutedtotheNuclearRecordsVault./R4ENDOFSECTION6.9 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:46of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.10Guideline/Instruction ChangesandRevisions NOTEAppendixNshallbeusedtodocumentguideline/instruction changesandrevisions.

1.Anapprovedguideline doesNOTrequireFRGreviewforfuturerevisions, howevera10CFR50.59screening byaQualified Reviewerisrequiredforallchangesorrevisions.

/R42.Changestoguidelines/instructions maybehandwritten onthemaster,whichismaintained bytheeffecteddepartment.

3.Revisions toguidelines/instructions consolidate handwritten changesandarewordprocessed.

4.TheAuthorshallperformthefollowing:

A.CompletetheAuthorsectionandattachAppendixN,Guideiineflnstruction ChangeRequesttothechangeorrevision.

B.EnsurethechangeorrevisionhasNOTalteredthedocumentfrommeetingtheguideline/instruction criteriabyverifying thefollowing:

ThedocumentisNOTaprocedure asdescribed intheUFSAR.RefertoAppendixAforthedefinition of"procedure asdescribed intheUFSAR."2.ThedocumentisNOTaprocedure asdescribed inT.S.6.8.1.RefertoAppendixAforthedefinition ofaprocedure.

C.SelectaQualified Reviewertoperforma10CFR50.59screening.

/R4 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:47of106Ql-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.10Guideline/Instruction ChangesandRevisions (continued) 5.TheQualified Reviewershall:/R4A.Performa10CFR50.59screening inaccordance withADM-17.11, 10CFR50.59Screening.

Uponcompletion, attachthedocumented resultstotheassociated guideline/instruction changerequestpackage./R4B.CompletetheQualified ReviewersectionofAppendixNandreturntheguideline/instruction changepackageandthe10CFR50.59screening resultstotheAuthorforadditional processing.

/R46.TheAuthorshallperformthefollowing:

A.Determine thesubcommittee membership.

B.Obtainsubcommittee reviews.C.Iftheguideline/instruction affectsotherdepartments, ensurethosedepartments areproperlyrepresented inthesubcommittee process.7.TheSubcommittee shallperformthefollowing:

A.VerifythechangeorrevisionhasNOTalteredthedocumentfrommeetingtheguideline/instruction criteriabyperforming thefollowing:

1.ThedocumentisNOTaprocedure asdescribed intheUFSAR.RefertoAppendixAforthedefinition of"procedure asdescribed intheUFSAR."2.ThedocumentisNOTaprocedure asdescribed inT.S,6.8.1.RefertoAppendixAforthedefinition ofaprocedure.

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:48of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.10Guideline/Instruction ChangesandRevisions (continued) 7.(continued)

B.Performatechnical reviewofthechangeorrevision.

C.DocumentreviewonaformsimilartoAppendixF.D.ReturnthepackagetotheAuthor.8.TheAuthorshallforwardtheGuideline/Instruction proposedchangetotheresponsible Department Head.9.Theresponsible Department Headshallperformthefollowing:

A.Revieweachguideline/instruction changeorrevisionanddocumentthereviewaridapprovalonaformsimilartoAppendixN.B.Ensuretrainingisperformed priortotheissuanceofachangeorrevision, asnecessary.

C.Ensuredistribution andimplementation requirements areestablished.

D.Ensureanyguideline/instruction whichaffectsaccredited trainingprogramsisroutedtotheTrainingDepartment library.E.Submitthefollowing documents totheNuclearRecordsVault:1.AcopyofallGuidelines/Instructions reviewedbyFRGandapprovedbythePlantGeneralManager.2.AcopyofeachproposedGuideline/Instruction changeorrevisionandassociated supporting documentation (i.e.,safetyevaluations, dispositions, etc.)whenthe50.59screening resultsinaYESanswer.ENDOFSECTION5.10 REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:49of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.11LettersofInstructions (LOls)NOTE~ifthecontentofanewdocumentmeetsguideline/instruction criteriaconsidercreatingaguideline/instruction ratherthananLOI.~Figure3showsthisprocessinflowpathform.~AppendixIisusedtodocumentthisprocess.~Revisions toLOlsshallbeperformed usingtheProcedure Change/Revision processdescribed inthisQl.~WhenwritinganewLOIrefertoADM-1102, St.LucieProcedure Writer'sGuideTheAuthoroftheLOIshallperformthefollowing:

A.DrafttheLOI.B.Ifrequired, usenotationsymbolstoreference acommitment ordirection intheleftcolumnnexttotheaffectedstep.Seedefinition ofnotationsymbolsinAppendixA.C.CompleteAuthorBlocksoftheLetterOfInstruction Request,AppendixI.D.Iftheprocedure changeinvolvesaPlantPolicyPSL-105issue,followthepolicyrequirements forsubcommittee review.E.TheAuthorshallobtainthefollowing applicable reviewsandensureeachreviewisdocumented onaformsimilartotheProcedure CommentForm,AppendixF:ObtainQAreviewiftheprocedure isaQlorAdministrative procedure.

2.ObtainQCreviewiftheprocedure isaMaintenance procedure.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:50of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.11LettersofInstructions (LOls)(continued)

TheAuthoroftheLOIshallperformthefollowing:

(continued)

E.(continued) 3.ObtainChemicalControlSupervisor reviewifthisprocedure changereferences anynewchemical~4.ObtainEngineering reviewifthisprocedure changealterstheorderofinitiating signalsofatest.5.ObtainOperations SupportSupervisor reviewifthisprocedure changedeletesorchangesaprocedure number.6.ObtainNuclearBusinessUnitJointSafetyCommittee (NBUJSC)Reviewifthisprocedure changeaffectstheclearance procedure.

F.TheAuthorshallselectaQualified Reviewertoperforma10CFR50.59screening oftheproposedchange.2.TheQualified Reviewershall:/R4/R4A.Performa10CFR50.59screening inaccordance withADM-17.11, 10CFR50.59Screening.

Uponcompletion, attachthedocumented resultstotheassociated LOIpackage./R4MOTEUFSARerrorsorimprovements includedifferences betweenproceduralized operating andmaintenance practices andsimilaractivities referenced intheUFSAR.B.IfaUFSARerrororimprovement suggestion isdiscovered, theQualified ReviewershallsubmitaUFSARUserCommentForm,similartoAppendixL,toSiteEngineering forprocessing andgenerateaCondition Reportinaccordance withAP0006130,Condition Reports,ifapplicable.

REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:51of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.11LettersofInstructions (LOls)(continued) 2.(continued)

C.Uponcompletion, returntheLOIpackageandthe10CFR50.59screening resultstotheAuthor./R4NOTE~Ifappropriate, theAuthormayselectmorethanonesubcommittee member.~Eachdepartment affectedbytheLOIshouldhavetheopportunity tosubcommittee theLOI.,3.TheAuthorshallperformthefollowing:

A.Determine therequiredsubcommittee reviewer(s),

basedonaffecteddepartment(s) andend-user(s).

B.ForwardcopiesoftheLOIpackagetotheselectedSubcommittee reviewer(s) forreviewwithformssimilartoAppendixFforcomments.

NOTESelectedSubcommittee Reviewer(s) shallhavequalifications whichareequivalent to,orgreaterthan,thoseoftheAuthorintherelevantsubjectmatter.4.TheSubcommittee reviewer(s) shallperformanindependent technical reviewoftheLOItoensuretheLOI:A.Isreviewedforpotential adverseimpactonplantpersonnel and/orequipment.

B.Istechnically accurate.

REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:52of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.11LettersofInstructions (LOls)(continued) 4.TheSubcommittee reviewer(s) shallperformanindependent technical reviewoftheLOItoensuretheLOI:(continued)

C.Isinagreement withtheUFSAR.D.Ifrequired, usesnotationsymbolstoreference acommitment ordirection intheleftcolumnnexttotheaffectedstep.Seedefinition ofnotationsymbolsinAppendixA.E.Iscompatible withthereferenced plantconditions.

F.Requiresproperimplementation ofIndependent Verification inaccordance withADM-17.06, Independent Verification.

G.Requiresproperimplementation ofQCHoldPointsand/orQCSurveillance points.H.Requiresproperimplementation ofHealthPhysicsprecautions andpolicies.

I.Requirescompliance withtheFPLNuclearDivisionSafeWorkPractices manual.5.TheSubcommittee reviewer(s) shall:A.DocumentreviewonaformsimilartoAppendixF.B.ReturnLOIpackageand10CFR50.59screening resultstotheAuthoruponcompletion.

/R46.TheAuthorshallresolveallcommentsfromthesubcommittee reviewer(s),

andincorporate anyadditional requiredchangestotheLOIorconsultwiththeDepartment Headtoresolvedisagreements.

REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:53of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUGIEPLANT5.0INSTRUCTIONS:

(continued) 5.11LettersofInstructions (LOls)(continued) 7.TheAuthorshallforwardtheoriginalLOIpackagetotheresponsible Department Headforreview.8.Theresponsible Department Head,ordesignee, responsible fortheLOI,shallperformthefollowing:

A.ReviewtheLOIpackageandanswerthequestions intheDepartment HeadSectionofAppendixI.1.Ifpre-implementation trainingisrequiredperformthefollowing:

/R4a.CompleteandattachAppendixO./R4b.Ensuretrainingiscompleted inaccordance withdepartmental trainingplans./R4B.IffoundNOTinconcurrence withtheproposedLOI,providereasonforunacceptability totheAuthor.C.SignanddateDepartment HeadapprovalonAppendixI.D.ReturntheLOIpackagetotheAuthor.9.TheAuthorshallforwardtheLOIpackagetotheInformation ServicesDepartment fortrackingandscheduling forFRG.10.TheInformation ServicesDepartment shallperformthefollowing:

A.Performanadministrative reviewoftheLOIpackage.B.LogtheLOIintothetrackingsystem.C.PlacetheLOIontheFRGagendaforFRGreview.

REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:54of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS:

(continued) 5.11LettersofInstructions (LOls)(continued) 11.TheFRGshallperformthefollowing:

A.Reviewsubmitted LOIpackage.NOTETheexpiration dateisoptionalfortheFRGtoset.IfadateisNOTspecified, thedatewillbeoneyearfromtheissuedateandisautomatically canceledbyInformation Services.

B.Assignexpiration date.C.IftheFRGconcurswiththeproposedLOI,theFRGChairmanshallrecommend approvalbyinitialling AppendixI.12.ThePlantGeneralManagershallreviewtheFRGminutes.Ifheconcurswiththerecommendations oftheFRG,heshallsigntheminutesindicating hisapproval.

13.TheInformation ServicesDepartment shallperformthefollowing:

A.WordprocesstheapprovedLOI.B.ForwardthecompleteLOIpackagetoDocumentControl.14.DocumentControlshalldistribute theLOI.15.TheapprovedLOIpackageshallbeforwarded toNuclearRecordsVaulttobemaintained intheplantfiles.ENDOFSECTION5.11 e

REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:55of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.12Pre-Operational TestProcedure NOTE~Figure4showstheprocessinflowpathform.~Appendices GandHareusedinthisprocess.Development ofPre-Operational Testprocedures followthesameprocessasanewprocedure.

2.ChangestoPre-Operational Testprocedures followtheTemporary ChangeprocessorProcedure Changeprocess.3.Reviewofcompleted Pre-Operational TestProcedures:

A.AppendixGshallhaveallsign-offs completed andanyadditional recordsrequiredbytheTestProcedure shallbeattached.

B.AppendixHshallbeattachedtoallPre-Operational TestProcedures.

C.TheDepartment Headordesigneeshallreviewtheprocedure toensuretheintentofthetestwascompliedwithandthatacceptance criteriaweremet.D.Pre-Operational TestProcedures ofasafetyrelatednaturemaybereviewedbySiteEngineering Department.

E.Pre-Operational TestProcedures maybereviewed, ifapplicable, byappropriate vendors.F.TheFRGshallperformthefollowing:

1.Reviewtoensurethatalldesignparameters arewithinspecification andshallevaluatedeviations observedforassurance thatthetestisnotinvalidated.

2.Consideroutside(i.e.,vendor)commentsonthecompleted test,whennecessary, toassurethatthesystemtestedisacceptable forsafeplantoperation.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NoPROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, "REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:56of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.12Pre-Operational TestProcedure (continued) 3.Reviewofcompleted Pre-Operational TestProcedures:

(continued)

F.TheFRGshallperformthefollowing:

(continued) 3.Determine whatfurtheractionisnecessary, ifdesignparameters areNOTachieved.

4.Recommend approvaltothePlantGeneralManagerifdesignparameters wereachievedandthePre-Operational Testissatisfactory.

G.ThePlantGeneralManagershallreviewtheFRGminutes.Ifheconcurswiththerecommendations, thenheshallsigntheminutestodocumenthisapproval.

H.TheapprovedTestProcedure shallbefiledinaccordance withQl17-PR/PSL-1, QualityAssurance Records,ENDOFSECTION5.12, REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:57of1065.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 5.13Pre-Implementation TrainingReviewCAUTIONPre-implementation trainingisrequiredfornewQlsandAdministrative procedures.

NOTE~Appendix0isusedtodocumentthisprocess.~TheFRGmayrequirepre-implementation trainingfornew/upgraded procedures andguidelinesfinstructions.

~TheFRGmayrequirepre-implementation trainingforrevisions toprocedures thatsubstantially changetherequirements orinstructions.

~Pre-implementation trainingisNOTrequiredforrevisions toprocedures involving onlyeditorial changesorchangeshavingnoeffectonthemannerinwhichtheprocedure isimplemented.

't.TheDepartment HeadshallreviewthecontentofthePCRorUPRforpre-implementation training.

/R4A.Ifpre-implementation trainingisrequired, theDepartment Headshallperformthefollowing:

/R4CompleteandattachAppendixO./R42.Ensuretheassociated document(s) areplacedONHOLDuntilpre-implementation trainingiscompleted inaccordance withdepartmental trainingplans,ifappropriate.

/R42.TheFRGshallperformthefollowing:

A.Reviewthepre-implementation trainingrecommendation (Appendix 0).B.Initiateappropriate pre-implementation trainingrequirements.

C.Establish procedure implementation duedate.

REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:58of106QI-5-PSL-1

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT5.13Pre-Implementation TrainingReview(continued) 3.UponreceiptofAppendix0,theInformation ServicesDepartment shallperformthefollowing:

A.Wordprocessthedocumentclearlymarkeddraft.B.CompletetheirportionoftheAppendixO.C.IssueaPMAIforcompletion ofrequiredpre-implementation training.

D.Distribute acopyofthecompletepackagetotheDepartment Headindicated onAppendixO.4.Department Headordesigneeindicated onAppendix0shallperformthefollowing:

A.Determine howthisprocedure changeaffectshisdepartmental processes.

B.Traintheappropriate personnel intherequirements oftheneworrevisedprocedure inaccordance withhisdepartmental trainingplan.C.Documentthistraininginaccordance withQl2-PR/PSL-2, Indoctrination andTrainingofSt.LuciePlantPersonnel.

D.Ensureanydepartmental guidelinesfinstructions whichareaffectedbythischangeareproperlyreviewedandrevisedifnecessary.

E.CompletehisportionofAppendix0andattachtoPMAI.F.ClosethePMAIassociated withthispre-implementation training.

5.TheInformation ServicesDepartment shalldistribute therevisedprocedure uponcompletion oftraining.

ENDOFSECTION5.13

REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:59of1066.0RECORDSREQUIRED6.1Thefollowing recordsshallbemaintained intheplantfilesinaccordance withQl17-PR/PSL-1, QualityAssurance Records.1.AppendixD,Procedure ChangeRequest2.AppendixE,Upgraded/New Procedure RequestForm3.AppendixF,Procedure CommentForm4.AppendixG,Completed Pre-Operational TestProcedure Form5.AppendixH,Pre-Operational TestSummary6.AppendixI,LetterofInstruction RequestForm7.AppendixJ,PeriodicReviewofPlantProcedures 8.AppendixK,Procedure Responsibility Transfer9.AppendixL,UFSARUserCommentForm10.AppendixM,NewGuideline/Instruction Request11.AppendixN,Guideline/Instruction ChangeRequest12.Appendix0,Pre-Implementation TrainingNotification Form13.Procedures 14.NewGuidelines/Instructions 15.LettersofInstruction 16.FRGMeetingMinutes/R4/R4/R4ENDOFSECTION6.0 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:60of10

67.0REFERENCES

NOTEOneormoreofthefollowing symbolsmaybeusedinthisprocedure:

gIndicates aRegulatory commitment madebyTechnical Specifications, Condition ofLicense,Audit,LER,Bulletin, etc.,'andshallNOTberevisedwithoutFacilityReviewGroupreviewandPlantGeneralManagerapproval.

$Indicates amanagement directive, vendorrecommendation, plantpracticeorothernon-regulatory commitment thatshouldNOTberevisedwithoutconsultation withtheplantstaff.'PIndicates astepthatrequiresasign-offonadatasheet.g,7.1St.LucieUnit1and2Technical Specifications, Section6.8,Administrative Controls; Procedures g,7.2St.LucieUnits1and2UFSARSection13,ConductofOperations.

7.3Procedures ADM-0010432, ControlofPlantWorkOrdersADM-11.02, St.LucieProcedure Writer'sGuideADM-11.03, Temporary ChangetoProcedures ADM-17.06, Independent Verification AP0006130,Condition ReportsAP0010520,FacilityReviewGroupQl2-PR/PSL-2, Indoctrination andTrainingofSt.LuciePlantPersonnel REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:61of10

67.0REFERENCES

(continued) 7.3Procedures (continued)

~Ql5-PR/PSL-2, Writer'sGuideforEmergency Operating Procedures

~Ql5-PR/PSL-3, Verification GuideforEmergency Operating Procedures

/R4/R4~Ql5-PR/PSL-4, Validation GuideforEmergency Operating Procedures

/R4Ql5-PR/PSL-6, Requirements forDevelopment andRevisionofEmergency Operating Procedures.

~Ql6-PR/PSL-1, DocumentControl~Ql17-PR/PSL-1, QualityAssurance Records~C-200,OffsiteDoseCalculation Manual(ODCM)7.4Commitments

/R4~Condition Report(CR)97-03047.5NRCCorrespondence

~NRCInspection Reportnumbers50-335/90-32 and50-389/90-32, ItemH,Licensee's Exception to24MonthProcedure Review~NRCInspection Reportnumbers50-335/95-18 and50-389/95-18, Violation C7.6Regulatory Guide1.33,QualityAssurance ProgramRequirements andNUREG0737 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:62of10

67.0REFERENCES

(continued) 7.7FPLNuclearDivisionSt.LucieSafeWorkPractices Manual7.8AmericanNationalStandards Institute N18.7-1976, Administrative ControlsandQualityAssurance fortheOperational PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants,RevisionofN18.7-1976 g,7.9PSLPolicy105ENDOFSECTION7.0 REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:63of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXADEFINITIONS (Page1of6)1~CriticalCharacteristics:

Measurable orcontroilable aspectsofaprocedure whichshouldbecloselymonitored toensurehighqualityworkandoveralljobsuccess.Thereareimportant design,materialandperformance standards ofacomponent that,onceverified, willprovidereasonable assurance thatthecomponent willperformitsintendedsafetyfunction.

Examplesofcriticalcharacteristics include:~Orientation ofparts~Sequenceofassembly~Component materials

~Tolerances (thickness, clearances,

movement, trueness)

~Torquevalues~Surfacepreparations

~Environmental conditions andcontrols~Implementation ofIndependent Verification andHoldPoints~Adequatedocumentation ofAsFound/AsLeftdata~ClearlystatedandaccurateAcceptance Criteria~Returnofsystem/component tonormalplantconfiguration 2.DesktopInstruction/Department PlanNonsafety-related instruction orplanusedtomaintainadepartment trainingplanoradministrative department instruction.

TheseitemsarenotcoveredunderthisQl.3.End-UserAnend-userisapersonwhoactuallyputstheprocedure inuse(e.g.,RCO,Mechanic, Technician)

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:64of106QI-5-PSL-3 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXADEFINITIONS (Page2of6)4.Guideline/Instruction Adocumentwhichhasbeendetermined bytheFRGtoNOTrequireFRGreviewforimplementation offuturerevisions.

5.LettersofInstruction (LOI)Instructions whichhaveageneralbuttemporary application totheconductofbusinessandwhichrequiredissemination totheplantstaff.Thesedocuments normallyapplytoasingledepartment andareoriginated inthevariousdepartments bytheDepartment Head.AllLettersofInstruction shallbereviewedbytheFRGandapprovedbythePlantGeneralManager.6.NotationSymbolsNotationsymbolsshouldbeaccompanied byasubscripted numbertocross-reference theaffectedstep(s)withtheapplicable reference.

Forexample,agivenstepindicates thatitistiedtoadirective listedwithinthereferences section.Toshowarelationship betweenthetwo,thereference wouldbenotatedwithtt,org,andthestepwouldalsocarrythesamenotation.

Indicates aRegulatory commitment madebyTechnical Specifications, Condition ofLicense,Audit,LER,Bulletin, etc.,andshallNOTberevisedwithoutFacilityReviewGroupreviewandPlantGeneralManagerapproval~Indicates amanagement directive, vendorrecommendation, plantpracticeorothernon-regulatory commitment thatshouldNOTberevisedwithoutconsultation withtheplantstaff.'PIndicates astepthatrequiresasignoffonadatasheet.7.Pre-Operational TestProcedure Writteninstructions whichdemonstrate thecapability ofstructures, systemsandcomponents tomeetsafetyrelatedanddesignrequirements.

Itisthepurposeoftheseprocedures totestasystem/component underactualorsimulated operating conditions toensurethesystem/component meetsitsdesigncriteria.

Testingandacceptance criteriashallbespecifictotheactivityperformed basedonapplicable codes,standards, designrequirements,

drawings, technical manualsandtechnical specifications.

REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXADEFINITIONS (Page3of6),PAGE:65of1068.Procedure Awrittenprocedure, recommended bytheFacilityReviewGroup(FRG)andapprovedbythePlantGeneralManager,whichprovidesaseriesofactionsorstepstobeperformed toaccomplish adesiredobjective.

Procedures arethosedocuments whichhavebeenoutlinedbyTechnical Specification 6.8.1aslistedbelow.Theapplicable procedures recommended inAppendixAofReg.Guide1.33(seeAppendixBofthisprocedure)

Theapplicable procedures recommended inNUREG-0737 (seeAppendixBofthisprocedure)

Refueling Operations Surveillance andtestactivities ofsafetyrelatedequipment SecurityPlanimplementation Emergency Planimplementation FireProtection Programimplementation

~Radwasteshipping~Asdetermined byPlantGeneralManager~ProcessControlProgramOffSiteDoseCalculation Manual(Chemistry Procedure C-200)Q.C.ProgramforEffluentMonitoring perReg.Guide1.21Q.C.ProgramforEnvironmental Monitoring perRegGuide4.1 REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:66of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXADEFINITIONS (Page4of6)9.Procedures asdescribed intheUpdatedFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(UFSAR)Aprocedure simplylistedbytype,titleand/ornumber(andnotoutlined, summarized, orcompletely described) intheSAR,doesnotrequirereviewinaccordance with10CFR50.59.2.Procedures thatareoutlined(usuallybydescribing asequenceofeventsorstepsthatmustbeperformed foragivenactivity),

summarized, orcompletely described intheSARmustbeevaluated under10CFR50,59.3.Changestoprocedural requirements contained indescriptions ofactivities, functional

controls, configuration, tasks,andtestingconstitute "procedures described intheSAR";eventhoughtheseinstances arenotusuallyclearlyidentified asprocedures.

Under10CFR50.59,procedures arenotlimitedtoitemsspecifically identified asprocedures (e.g.,operating, chemistry, system,test,surveillance, andemergency plan).Infactmostprocedural descriptions intheUFSARarenotclearlyidentified asprocedures andarealmostneverreferredtobytitleornumber.Procedure descriptions intheUFSARofthistypemayconsistofstatements suchas"thesystemisnormallyoperatedinautomatic mode".Theregulatory interpretation ofthesestatements isthattheyrepresent procedural descriptions thatmustbeconsistent withtheapplicable operating procedures.

Contrasting examplesofSARprocedures, asdescribed above,follow.IftheSARdescription oftheradioactive wastesystemstatesthattheShiftSupervisor willauthorize allradioactive liquidreleases, asafetyevaluation wouldberequiredbeforeassigning thisfunctiontootherthantheShiftSupervisor.

Ontheotherhand,iftheSARmerelystatesthatradioactive liquidreleaseswillbeauthorized asdetailedbyplantprocedures, theredesignation oftheauthorization functionwouldnotrequireasafetyevaluation.

Ifthereactorstartupprocedure, asdescribed intheSAR,containseightfundamental sequences, thedecisiontoeliminate oneofthesequences wouldrequireasafetyevaluation.

Ontheotherhand,iftheeightfundamental sequences areconsolidated andthebasicfunctions performed arenotaltered,asafetyevaluation wouldnotbenecessary.

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:67of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXADEFINITIONS (Page5of6)10.QualityControlAttributes Inspections, testsoranalysiswhichareperformed onCriticalCharacteristics ofaprocedure toprovidereasonable assurance thatthecomponent willperformitsintendedsafetyfunction.

ExamplesofQualityControlAttributes are:~QCHoldPoints~Independent Verifications

~SecondPartyReviews~Signoffs~Checklists

~Cautions~Notes~Precautions andLimits~Detailedsequenceofsteps~Inspections

~Measurements 11.Qualified ReviewerApersonwhohassuccessfully completed 10CFR50.59training, isabletoapplythisknowledge toeffectively reviewprocedural documents, andisauthorized bytheEngineering Manager(i.e.,nameisonthePSLQualified ReviewerList.TheSiteQualified ReviewerListismaintained bytheTrainingDepartment.

/R4 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXADEFINITIONS (Page6of6)PAGE:68of10612.Responsible Procedure GroupApersonorgroupassigned/delegated theresponsibility forgenerating,

revising, reviewing, andapproving aspecifictypeofplantprocedure.

Exceptfortheprocedure upgradeeffortcurrently beingimplemented bytheISProcedure Development Group,eachdepartment isresponsible forgenerating,

revising, reviewing, andapproving theirowndepartmental procedures.

TheISProcedure Development Groupisresponsible fortheupgradeofOperations, Maintenance andAdministrative procedures.

13.SecurityForceInstructions Detailedstep-by-step instructions usedsolelybythesecurityforcetoperformtherequirements ofthePhysicalSecurityPlanandSafeguards Contingency Planasoutlinedintheimplementing procedures.

Theseinstructions areNOTwithinthescopeofQI-5-PSL-1.

14.TrainingRelevancy Neworrevisedprocedures aretrainingrelevantiftheyaffectexistingtrainingmaterials orshouldbeaddressed byanactivitywhichimplements adepartmental trainingplanoranaccredited trainingprogram.15.UpgradedProcedure Aprocedure thatiswrittenintheupdatedformatinaccordance withADM-11.02, St.LucieProcedure Writer'sGuide,andhasgonethroughtheupgradeprocesscontained inthisinstruction.

ENDOFAPPENDIXA REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:69of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 TYPICALPROCEDURES FORPRESSURIZED WATERREACTORS(Page1of13)Thefollowing aretypicalFRGRequiredactivities thatshallbecoveredbywrittenprocedures.

Thisappendixisnotintendedasaninclusive listingofallneeded,procedures sincemanyotheractivities carriedoutduringtheoperation phaseofnuclearpowerplantsshouldbecoveredbyprocedures notincludedinthislist.1.Administrative Procedures A.SecurityandVisitorControlB.Authorities andResponsibilities forSafeOperation andShutdownC.Equipment Control(e.g.,lockingandtagging)D.Procedure Adherence andTemporary ChangeMethodE.Procedure ReviewandApprovalF.ScheduleforSurveillance TestsandCalibration G.ShiftandReliefTurnoverH.LogEntries,RecordRetention, andReviewProcedures I.AccesstoContainment J.BypassofSafetyFunctions andJumperControlK.Maintenance ofMinimumShiftComplement andCall-InofPersonnel L.PlantFireProtection ProgramM.Communication SystemProcedures 2.GeneralPlantOperating Procedures A.ColdShutdowntoHotStandbyB.HotStandbytoMinimumLoad(nuclearstartup)C.RecoveryfromReactorTripD.Operation atHotStandbyE.TurbineStartupandSynchronization ofGenerator F.ChangingLoadandLoadFollow(ifapplicable)

G.PowerOperation andProcessMonitoring H.PowerOperation withlessthanFullReactorCoolantFlowPlantShutdowntoHotStandbyJ.HotStandbytoColdShutdownK.Preparation forRefueling andRefueling Equipment Operation L.Refueling andCoreAlterations REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:70of106'PPENDIX8CONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 TYPICALPROCEDURES FORPRESSURIZED WATERREACTORS(Page2of13)3.Procedures forStartup,Operation andShutdownofSafety-Related PWRSystemsInstructions forenergizing, filling,venting,draining, startup,shutdownandchangingmodesofoperation shouldbeprepared, asappropriate, forthefollowing systems:A.ReactorCoolantSystemB.ControlRodDriveSystem(including part-length rods)C.ShutdownCoolingSystemD.Emergency CoreCoolingSystemE.Component CoolingWaterSystemF.Containment 1.Maintaining Containment Integrity 2.SpecialContainment Systemsa.Atmosphere b.Subatmosph ericc.Double-Wall Containment withControlled Interspace d.IceCondenser 3.Containment Ventilation System4.Containment CoolingSystemG.Atmosphere CleanupSystemsH.FuelStoragePoolPurification andCoolingSystemI.MainSteamSystemJ.Pressurizer PressureandSprayControlSystemsK.Feedwater System(feedwater pumpstosteamgenerator)

L.Auxiliary Feedwater SystemM.ServiceWaterSystemN.ChemicalandVolumeControlSystem(including Letdown/Purification System)O.Auxiliary orReactorBuildingHeatingandVentilation P.ControlRoomHeatingandVentilation Q:RadwasteBuildingHeatingandVentilation R.Instrument AirSystem REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:71of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 TYPICALPROCEDURES FORPRESSURIZED WATERREACTORS(Page3of13)3.(continued)

S.Electrical System1.Offsite(accesscircuits) 2.Onsitea.Emergency PowerSources(e.g.,dieselgenerator, batteries) b.A.C.Systemc.D.C.SystemT.NuclearInstrument SystemSourceRange2.Intermediate Range3.PowerRange4.IncoreSystemU.ReactorControlandProtection SystemV.HydrogenRecombiner 4.Procedures forStartup,Operation andShutdownofSafety-Related BWRSystemsNotApplicable toSt.LuciePlant5.Procedures forAbnormal, OffNormalorAlarmConditions Sincetheseprocedures arenumerousandcorrespond tothenumberofalarmannunciators, theprocedures areNOTindividually listed.Eachsafety-relatedannunciator shouldhaveitsownwrittenprocedure, whichshouldnormallycontain(1)themeaningoftheannunciator, (2)thesourceofthesignal,(3)theimmediate actionthatistooccurautomatically, (4)theimmediate operation action,and(5)thelong-range actions.

I REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:72of106.APPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 TYPICALPROCEDURES FORPRESSURIZED WATERREACTORS(Page4of13)6.Procedures forCombating Emergencies andOtherSignificant EventsA.LossofCoolant(including significant PWRsteamgenerator leaks)insideandoutsideprimarycontainment)

(largeandsmall,including leak-rate determination)

B.LossofInstrument AirC.LossofElectrical Power(and/ordegradedpowersources)D.LossofCoreCoolantFlowE.LossofCondenser VacuumF.LossofContainment Integrity G.LossofServiceWaterH.LossofShutdownCoolingI.LossofComponent CoolingSystemandCoolingtoIndividual Components J.LossofFeedwater orFeedwater SystemFailureK.LossofProtective SystemChannelL.Mispositioned ControlRodorRods(androddrops)M.Inability toDriveControlRodsN.Conditions Requiring UseofEmergency.

BorationorStandbyLiquidControlSystemO.FuelCladdingFailureorHighActivityinReactorCoolantorOffgasP.FireinControlRoomorForcedEvacuation ofControlRoomQ.TurbineandGenerator TripsR.OtherExpectedTransients thatmaybeApplicable S.Malfunction ofAutomatic Reactivity ControlSystemT.Malfunction ofPressureControlSystemU.ReactorTripV.PlantFiresW.ActsofNature(e.g.,tornado,flood,damfailure,earthquakes)

X.Irradiated FuelDamageWhileRefueling Y.AbnormalReleasesofRadioactivity 00Jt REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:73of106APPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 TYPICALPROCEDURES FORPRESSURIZED WATERREACTORS(Page5of13)7.Procedures forControlofRadioactivity (Forlimitingmaterials releasedtoenvironment andlimitingpersonnel exposure)

A.LiquidRadioactive WasteSystem1.Collection, Demineralizing, Filtering, Evaporating andConcentrating andNeutralizing 2.SamplingandMonitoring 3.Discharging toEffluents llB.SolidWasteSystem1.SpentResinsandFilterSludgeHandling2.BalingMachineOperation 3.DrumHandlingandStorageC.PWRGaseousEffluentSystem1.Collection, Storage,andDischarge 2.SamplingandMonitoring 3.AirEjectorandStackMonitoring 4.Ventilation AirMonitoring D.BWRAirExtraction, OffgasTreatment, andOtherGaseousEffluent'ystems NotApplicable toSt.LuciePlantE.Radiation Protection Procedures 1.AccessControltoRadiation AreasIncluding aRadiation WorkPermitSystem2.Radiation Surveys3.AirborneRadioactivity Monitoring 4.Contamination Control5.Respiratory Protection 6.TraininginRadiation Protection 7.Personnel Monitoring 8.BioassayProgram9.Implementation ofALARAProgram REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:74of106APPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 TYPICALPROCEDURES FORPRESSURIZED WATERREACTORS(Page6of13)7.(continued)

F.AreaRadiation Monitoring SystemOperation G.ProcessRadiation Monitoring SystemOperation H.Meteorological Monitoring 8.Procedures forControlofMeasuring andTestEquipment andforSurveillance Tests,Procedures andCalibrations.

A.Procedures ofatypeappropriate tothecircumstances shouldbeprovidedtoensurethattools,gauges,instruments, controlsandothermeasuring andtestingdevicesareproperlycontrolled, calibrated andadjustedatspecified periodstomaintainaccuracy.

Specificexamplesofsuchequipment tobecalibrated andtestedarereadoutinstruments, interlock permissive andprohibitcircuits, alarmdevices,sensors,signalconditioners,

controls, protective circuitsandlaboratory equipment.

B.Specificprocedures forsurveillance tests,inspections andcalibrations shouldbewritten(implementing procedures arerequiredforeachsurveillance test,inspection orcalibration listedinthetechnical specifications):

1~Pressurized WaterReactorsa.Containment Leak-Rate Testsb.Containment Isolation Testsc.Containment LocalLeakDetection Testsd.Containment HeadandRadioactivity RemovalSystemsTestse.Containment TendonTestsandInspections f.ServiceWaterSystemFunctional Testsg.MainSteamIsolation ValveTestsh.FireProtection SystemFunctional Testsi~BoricAcidTanks-LevelInstrumentation Calibrations j.Emergency CoreCoolingSystemTestsk.ControlRodOperability andScramTimeTestsI.ReactorProtection SystemTestsandCalibrations m.Permissives

-TestsandCalibrations n.Refueling SystemCircuitTests REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISiON, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:75of106APPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 TYPICALPROCEDURES FORPRESSURIZED WATERREACTORS(Page7of13)8.(continued)

B.(continued) 1.(continued) 0.Emergency BorationSystemFunctional Testsp.DNBChecksandIncore-Excore FluxMonitorCorrelations q.Emergency PowerTestsr.Auxiliary Feedwater SystemTestss.NSSSPressurization andLeakDetection t.Inspection ofReactorCoolantSystemPressureBoundaryu.Inspection ofPipeHangerSettingsv.ControlRodDriveSystemFunctional Testsw.HeatBalance-FluxMonitorCalibrations x.Pressurizer andMainSteamSafetyValveTestsy.LeakDetection SystemsTestsz.AxialandRadialFluxPatternDeterminations aa.Area,PortableandAirborneRadiation MonitorCalibrations ab.ProcessRadiation MonitorCalibrations ac.Environmental MonitorCalibrations ad.SafetyValveTestsae.TurbineOverspeed TripTestsaf.WaterStorageTanks-LevelInstrumentation Calibration 2.BoilingWaterReactorsNotApplicable toSt.LuciePlant9.Procedures forPerforming Maintenance A.Maintenance thatcanaffecttheperformance ofsafety-related equipment shouldbeproperlypreplanned andperformed inaccordance withwrittenprocedures, documented instructions, ordrawingsappropriate tothecircumstances.

Skillsnormallypossessed byqualified maintenance personnel maynotrequiredetailedstep-by-step delineation inaprocedure.

Thefollowing typesofactivities areamongthosethatmaynotrequiredetailedstep-by-step writtenprocedures:

1.GasketReplacement 2.Trouble-Shooting Electrical Circuits3.ChangingChartorDriveSpeedGearsorSlideWiresonRecorders REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:76of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 TYPICALPROCEDURES FORPRESSURIZED WATERREACTORS(Page8of13)9.(continued)

B.Preventive maintenance schedules shouldbedeveloped tospecifylubrication schedules, inspections ofequipment, replacement ofsuchitemsasfiltersandstrainers, andinspection orreplacement ofpartsthathaveaspecificlifetimesuchaswearrings.C.Procedures fortherepairorreplacement ofequipment shouldbepreparedpriortobeginning work.Suchprocedures formajorequipment thatisexpectedtoberepairedorreplacedduringthelifeoftheplantshouldpreferably bewrittenearlyinplantlife.Thefollowing areexamplesofsuchprocedures formajorequipment:

1.RepairofPWRSteamGenerator Tubes2.Replacement andRepairofControlRodDrives3.Replacement ofRecirculation PumpSeals4.Replacement ofImportant Strainers andFilters5.RepairorReplacement ofSafetyValves6.RepairofIncoreFluxMonitoring System7.Replacement ofNeutronDetectors fD.Procedures thatcouldbecategorized eitherasmaintenance oroperating procedures shouldbedeveloped forthefollowing activities.

Instructions fortheseactivities maybeincludedinsystemsprocedures.

Exerciseofequipment thatisnormallyidlebutthatmustoperatewhenrequired.

2.DrainingandRefilling HeatExchangers 3.DrainingandRefilling Recirculation Loop4.DrainingandRefilling theReactorVessel5.DrainingandRefilling SteamGenerators 6.RemovalofReactorHead7.Disconnection andReconnection ofWiringPenetration ReactorVesselHead8.Demineralizer ResinRegeneration orReplacement REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:77of106APPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 TYPICALPROCEDURES FORPRESSURIZED WATERREACTORS(Page9of13)9.(continued)

E.Generalprocedures forthecontrolofmaintenance, repair,replacement andmodification workshouldbepreparedbeforereactoroperation isbegun.Theseprocedures shouldincludeinformation onareassuchasthefollowing:

1..Methodforobtaining permission andclearance foroperation personnel toworkandforloggingsuchworkand2.Factorstobetakenintoaccount,including thenecessity forminimizing radiation exposuretoworkmen,inpreparing thedetailedworkprocedures, 10.ChemicalandRadiochemical ControlProcedures Chemicalandradiochemical controlprocedures shouldbewrittentoprescribe thenatureandfrequency ofsamplingandanalyses, theinstructions maintaining waterqualitywithinprescribed limits,andthelimitations onconcentrations ofagentsthatmaycausecorrosive attackorfoulingofheat-transfer surfacesorthatmaybecomesourcesofradiation hazardsduetoactivation.

Theseprocedures shouldspecifylaboratory instructions andcalibration oflaboratory equipment.

Extremeimportance mustbeplacedonlaboratory procedures usedtodetermine concentration andspeciesofradioactivity inliquidsandgasespriortorelease,including representative

sampling, validityofcalibration techniques andadequacyofanalyses.

REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:78of106APPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 CLARIFICATION OFTMIACTIONPLANREQUIREMENTS (Page10of13)Thefollowing isalistofthosesectionscontained withinNUREG-0737 whichpertaintoPressurized WaterReactors.

Foradetaileddiscussion ofaparticular subject,seetheapplicable sectionasindicated.

I.A.1~1ShiftTechnical AdvisorI.A.1.3I.A.2.1I.A.2.3I.A.3.1.I.B.1.2I.C.1ShiftManningImmediate Upgrading ofReactorOperatorandSeniorReactorOperatorTrainingandQualifications Administration ofTrainingProgramsReviseScopeandCriteriaforLicensing Examinations-Simulator Exams(Item3)Independent SafetyEngineering GroupGuidancefortheEvaluation andDevelopment ofProcedures forTransients andAccidents I.C.5I.C.6I.D.1I.D.2II.B.1II.B.2II.B.3Procedures forFeedbackofOperating Experience toPlantStaffGuidanceonProcedures forVerifying CorrectPerformance ofOperating Activities ControlRoomDesignReviewsPlantSafetyParameter DisplayConsoleReactorCoolantSystemVentsDesignReviewofPlantShielding andEnvironmental Qualification ofEquipment forSpaces/Systems WhichMaybeUsedinPostaccident Operations Postaccident SamplingCapability REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:79of106APPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 II.B.4II.D.1II.D.3II.E.1.1II.E.1.2II.E.3.1II.E.4.1II.EA.2II.F.1CLARIFICATION OFTMIACTIONPLANREQUIREMENTS (Page11of13)TrainingforMitigating CoreDamagePerformance TestingofBoilingWaterReactorandPressurized WaterReactorReliefandSafetyValves(NUREG-0578, Section2.1.2)DirectIndicatIon ofReliefandSafetyValvePositionAuxiliary Feedwater SystemEvaluation Auxiliary Feedwater SystemAutomatic Initiation andFlowIndication Emergency PowerSupplyforPressurizer HeatersDedicated HydrogenPenetrations Containment Isolation Dependability Attachment 1,October30,1979,InterimPositionforContainment PurgeandVentValveOperation PendingResolution ofIsolation ValveOperability Additional AccidentMonitoring Instrumentation Attachment 1,NobleGasEffluentMonitorAttachment 2,SamplingandAnalysisofPlantEffluents Attachment 3,Containment High-Range Radiation MonitorAttachment 4,Containment PressureMonitorAttachment 5,Containment WaterLevelMonitorAttachment 6,Containment HydrogenMonitor REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE NO.QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:80of106APPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 II.F.2II.G.1II,K.2.13 II.K.2.17CLARIFICATION OFTMIACTIONPLANREQUIREMENTS (Page12of13)Instrumentation forDetection ofInadequate CoreCoolingAttachment 1,DesignandQualification CriteriaforPressurized WaterReactorIncoreThermocouples Emergency PowerforPressurizer Equipment ThermalMechanical Report-Effect ofHigh-Pressure injection onVesselIntegrity forSmall-Break LossofCoolantAccidentwithNoAuxiliary Feedwater Potential forVoidingintheReactorCoolantSystemDuringTransients II.K.2.19II.K.3.1II.K.3.2II.K.3.5Sequential Auxiliary Feedwater FlowAnalysisInstallation andTestingofAutomatic PowerOperatedReliefValveIsolation SystemReportonOverallSafetyEffectofPowerOperatedReliefValveIsolation SystemAutomatic TripofReactorCoolantPumpsDuringLossofCoolantAccidentII.K.3.17II.K.3.25 II.K.3.28 II.K.3.30 II.K.3.31 ReportonOutagesofEmergency CoreCoolingSystemsLicenseeReportandProposedTechnical Specification ChangesEffectofLossofAlternating CurrentPoweronPumpSealsVerifyQualification ofAccumulators onAutomatic Depressurization SystemValvesRevisedSmall-Break LossofCoolantAccidentMethodstoShowCompliance with10CFRPart50,AppendixKPlantSpecificCalculations toShowCompliance with10CFRPart50.46 REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:81of106APPENDIXBCONTENTSOFREGULATORY GUIDE1.33AendixAANDNUREG-0737 III.A.2III.D.1.1 CLARIFICATION OFTMIACTIONPLANREQUIREMENTS (Page13of13)Improving LicenseeEmergency Preparedness-Long TermIntegrity ofSystemsOutsideContainment LikelytoContain.Radioactive MaterialforPressurized WaterReactorsandBoilingWaterReactorsIII.D.3.3 III.D.3.4 ImprovedInplantIodineInstrumentation UnderAccidentConditions ControlRoomHabitability Requirements Attachment 1,Information RequiredforControlRoomHabitability Evaluation ENDOFAPPENDIXB REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE No.:Ql-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXC(Page1of1)PAGE:82Of106THISPAGEWASINTENTIONALLY LEFTBLANK/R4 REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXDPROCEDURE CHANGEREQUEST(Page1of2)PAGE:83of1061.Procedure Title:Procedure Number:2.RequestType:0Procedure ChangeRequest(PCR)0Procedure Cancellation CurrentRevision:

0PeriodicReview(attachcompleted AppendixJ)0TCsModifiedandIncorporated TCNo(s):3.ReasonforRequest:0A.ResponsetoINPO,QA,orNRCRequirements 0B.CycleSpecific/Documented SetpointRevisions 0C.TechSpecRev./Licensing Requirements (ListTech.Spec.Amendment No.)0D.AftectsPlantOperability/Availability 0E.Tech.ManualRequirement/Revision 0F.Procedural Improvement 0G.PC/M(s)No.0H.Condition Report(s)

No.0I.PMAI(s)No.0J.Technically Incorrect 0K.Other4.BriefSummaryOfRequeSt(usaadditional pages,Ifnecessary):

CC0I5.ReviewEvaluation:

1.DoesthischangeaffecttheotherUnit'sprocedure, anotherequipment train,orchannel?IfYES,theresponsible department shallsubmitaPCRfortheoppositeUnit'sprocedure, equipment train,orchannel,asapplicable.

(N/Aforunitcommonprocedures).

2.IsthischangetoaQ.l.orAdministrative Procedure?

IfYES,obtainQ.A.Manager/Designee review.3.IsthisaPCRforaMaintenance Procedure?

IfYES,obtainQ.C.review.4.Doesthischangereference anynewchemical?

ItYES,obtainChemicalControlSupervisor review.g,5.Doesthischangealtertheorderofinitiating signalsof atest'?IfYES,Engineering reviewforpotential toadversely impactdesignfunctions isrequired.

6.Doesthischangedeleteorchangeaprocedure number?ItYES,obtainOperations SupportSupervisor review.7.Doesthischangeaffecttheclearance procedure?

IfYES,obtainNuclearBusinessUnitJointSafetyCommittee (NBUJSC)Review.8.Isthischangeresulting fromaneworrevisedPC/MorSafetyEvaluation'?

IfYES,verifythatthePC/M/SafetyEvaluation isFRGapproved.

6.Author:YESNOSignature PrintPhoneDate~~/R4 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:84of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXDPROCEDURE CHANGEREQUEST(Page2of2)Lu5.5tc.Cl'lLL7.10CFR50.59Screening A10CFR50.59Screening shallbeperformed inaccordance withADM-17.11, 10CFR50.59Screening.

Uponcompletion, attachthedocumented resultstotheassociated PCRpackage.OO~-~oCO(gK8.ServicesProjects, IS,HP,Chemistry,

Security, etc.Reviewedby:Signature PrintNameDate~~9,Responsible Department Head1.Wasthesubcommittee reviewperformed byqualified individuals?

2.Arethechangesvalidandtechnically correct?3.Arethechangesrelevanttoanytrainingprograms?

IfYES,identifythetargetpopulation oraffecteddepartments.

YESNO4.Dothechangesrequirepre-implementation training?

IfYES,completeandattachAppendixO.5.Processing priority01CI20304Dept.HeadDate~~10.FacilityReviewGroupFRGChairmanInitials:

Signature FRGffPrint11.PlantGeneralManagerApprovalofFRGMinutesFRGSecretary:

/R4 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXEUPGRADED/NEW PROCEDURE REQUESTFORM(Page1of6)PAGE:85of1061.PROCEDURE IDENTIFICATION ANDREVIEW1.Procedure Title:Procedure No.:BriefSummaryofRequest(useadditional pagesifnecessary):

2.Author.Date:~~Signature PrintNameTheAuthorsignature hereverifiesSection2,Procedure Evaluation Checklist andSection3,HumanFactorsAdequacyEvaluation arecomplete.

K0I2.PROCEDURE EVALUATION CHECKLIST Acheckmarkindicates thestephasbeencompleted (writeN/AifNotApplicable).

1.Additional Management oversight andcontrolsareincludediftheprocedure addresses aninfrequent testorevolution.

2.Reviewforduplicate procedure iscompleted.

A.APCRhasbeeninitiated todeletethosesectionsfromexistingprocedures whicharenowcontained inthisprocedure.

B.APCRhasbeeninitiated todeleteprocedures superseded bythisprocedure.

C.Allreferences ofdeletedprocedures inotherdocuments havebeenreviewedanddeleted.D.Alloutstanding TCshavebeenincorporated.

3.Procedure consistent withdesignbasisdocuments (Listparagraph numbersreferencing thisprocedure).

A.Applicable Tech.Spec.Sections:

B.Applicable UFSARSections:

CHECKg,,C.Ifapplicable, listTech.Spec.SectionsandUFSARparagraphs inAand8aboveintheprocedure references section./R4DATEDOCTDOCNsvsCOMPITMSOPSPROCEDuRE COMPLETED REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:86of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXEUPGRADED/NEW PROCEDURE REQUESTFORM(Page2of6)PROCEDURE EVALUATION CHECKLIST (continu'ed) 4.Regulatory commitments havebeencompliedwithandreferenced.

A.PlantAdministrative Procedures B.PlantQualityInstructions C.Notifications andReports(LERs,CRs,PMAIs)D.Regulatory Documents (Technical Specifications, UFSAR)E.NuclearDivision, PlantorDepartment PoliciesCHECKNOTEForquestions relatedtoenvironmental efforts,contacttheProtection ServicesSupervisor.

F.Thereisnoenvironmental effectnor,environmental questionthathasnotbeenevaluated bytheNRC.ContactthePSSupervisor forsupport,ifneeded.5.Independent Verification Requirements havebeenincludedinaccordance withADM-17.06, Independent Verification.

6.CriticalCharacteristics havebeenidentified, andhaveappropriate QualityControlAttributes (asdefinedinAppendixAofthisprocedure).

7.Setpoints usedinthisprocedure havebeencheckedforaccuracyagainstTEDBandotherEngineering documentation.

8.Provisions forjumperinstallation/removal, including sfgnoffsandIVs,havebeenincorporated.

9.Thepurposeofthisprocedure isclearlystated.10.Theinstructions aresufficiently detailedtoensurethestatedprocedural objective(s) aremet.A.Actionsrequiring notification ofregulatory agenciesarespecified.

B.Initialconditions arespecified.

C.Alldocuments referredtoinprocedural stepsarelistedinReferences section.D.Actions,procedures, systemsorequipment conditions whichmustbecompleted orexistpriortouseofthisprocedure

-aretobeaddressed inthePrerequisites section.E.AllHoldPointsareclearlyidentified.

11.Provisions forrecording data,securingdatatakerssignatures andensuringsupervisor reviewareproperlyprovided.

12.Restoration stepsareincludedandsufficiently detailed.

REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:87of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXEUPGRADED/NEW PROCEDURE REQUESTFORM(Page3of6)2.PROCEDURE EVALUATION CHECKLIST (continued)

CHECKNOTEIfasimulator ortrainingmock-upwalkdownispossible, thisisexpectedtobeperformed hands-on.

13.Awalkdownoftheprocedure hasbeenconducted toensureadequacyandaccuracyofprocedure scopeandinformation.

14.Thestructure andcontentoftheprocedure meetstherequirements ofADM-11.02.

15.NotationSymbols:A.Stepsidentified withagor5arelistedinanappendixortheReferences sectionwithadescription ofthedocumentusedtodevelopthestep.B.Stepswhichrequireasignoffinthedatasheetsshouldbeidentified withaytotheleftofthestepnumber.NOTEIfaprocedure changeresulting fromtheupgradeprocessistechnically compatible withtheotherunit'scorresponding procedure, aPCR/TCtotheotherunit'sprocedure isNOTnecessary.

16.Procedure checkedforoppositeunitapplicability andcompatibility.

17.Adequateforeignmaterialexclusion (FME)controlsarespecified.

18.References toplantorganizations contained inthisprocedure areinaccordance withthosereferenced inOrganizational Q.l.'s.19.Techniques usedindeveloping thedraftprocedure'(check asapplicable) 0FieldWalkdownQTrainingMock-up0Others0Simulator ClObservation (list)/R4 REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:88of106Ql-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXEUPGRADED/NEW PROCEDURE REQUESTFORM(Page4of6)3A.HUMANFACTORSADEQUACYEVALUATION 1.Doeseachpageoftheprocedure providethefollowing identification information?

IA.Procedure Numberand/orTitleB.CurrentRevisionNumberYesNoN/A,O,'K2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.C.PageNumberDoestheprocedure provideapurposewhichbrieflydescribes theprocedure function?

Areprocedure stepslimitedtoasingleactionverbwheneverpossible?

lfastepcontainsmorethantwoactions,aretheactionslistedratherthenembeddedinthesamesentence?

Aretheactionstobetakenclearlyidentified'?

Havegrammatical errorsbeeneliminated (capitalization, typographical errors,punctuation, etc.)?Areequipment numbersand/ornomenclature usedintheprocedure identical tothosedisplayed ontheequipment'?

Arecautionsplacedimmediately aheadofthestep(s)towhichtheyapply?Docautionsandnotesavoidtheuseofactionstatements (aretheyexpressed inapassivevoice)?Aregraphs,chartsandtableseasilyreadable, sothatvaluescanbeaccurately extracted andinterpreted?

Areacceptance criteriaandlimitsexpressed inquantitative terms?Arethequantitative acceptance criteriaandlimitsexpressed asarangewithamid-point ratherthanapointvalue(100psig,between95psigand105psigratherthan100k5psig)?Arecheck-off requirements (signature/initials) usedtodenotecompletion, performance, acceptance orpermission, includedinapplicable portionsofthebody,datasheetsorappendixes oftheprocedure?

Aremethodsofemphasisusedconsistently (i.e.,underlining, bolding,etc.)?Hasawalk-through beenperformed toassuretheprocedure canbeperformed inthesequencewritten?Cantheuserlocateandidentifyallequipment referenced intheprocedural steps'?Doestheprocedure andattachedalignments reflectthecurrentas-builtcondition oftheplant?Areunitsusedintheprocedure (i.e.,psig,gal/min,etc.)thesameasdisplayed oninstrumentation?

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1

'PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXEUPGRADED/NEW PROCEDURE REQUESTFORM(Page5of6)PAGE:89of1063B.REVIEWEVALUATION 1.DoesthischangeaffecttheotherUnit'sprocedure, anotherequipment train,orchannel?IfYES,theresponsible department shallsubmitaPCR/TCfortheoppositeUnit'sprocedure, equipment train,orchannel,asapplicable.

(N/Aforunitcommonprocedures) 2.IsthischangetoaQ.I.orAdministrative Procedure?

ItYES,obtainQ.A.Manager/Designee review.3.IsthisaPCRforaMaintenance Procedure?

IfYES,obtainQ.C.review.4.Doesthischangereference anynewchemical?

IfYES,obtainChemicalControlSupervisor review.5,5.Doesthischangealtertheorderofinitiating signalsofatest?IfYES,Engineering reviewforpotential toadversely impactdesignfunctions isrequired.

8.Doesthischangedeleteorchangeaprocedure number?IfYES,obtainOperations SupportSupervisor review.7.Doesthischangeaffecttheclearance procedure?

IfYES,obtainNuclearBusinessUnitJointSafetyCommittee (NBUJSC)Review.8.Isthischangeresulting tromaneworrevisedPC/MorSafetyEvaluation?

IfYES,verifythatthePC/M/SafetyEvaluation isFRGapproved.

4.10CFR50.59SCREENING YESNOA10CFR50.59Screening shallbeperformed inaccordance withADM-17.11, 10CFR50.59Screening.

Uponcompletion, attachthedocumented resultstotheassociated PCRpackage.1$45.END-USERWALKDOWNPrintNameSignature Department Phone:Date~~/R4

C~REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXEUPGRADED/NEW PROCEDURE REQUESTFORM(Page6of6)PAGE:90of1066.SERVICESPROJECTS, IS,HP,CHEMISTRY,

SECURITY, etc.Reviewedby:Signature PrintNameDate~~O-A7.RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT HEAD1.Wasthesubcommittee reviewperformed byqualified individuals?

2.Arethechangesvalidandtechnically correct?3.Arethechangesrelevanttoanytrainingprograms?

IfYES,identifythetargetpopulation oraffecteddepartments.

4.Dothechangesrequirepre-implementation training?

IfYES,completeandattachAppendixO.5.Processing priority01020304YESNODept.HeadSignature PrintDate~~8.FacilityReviewGroupFRGChairmanInitials:

FRG¹-Date:~~9.PlantGeneralManagerApprovalofFRGMinutesFRGSecretary

/R4 REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:91of106APPENDIXFPROCEDURE COMMENTFORM(Page1of1)PageofThefollowing department(s) areaffectedbyorresponsible fortheimplementation orreviewofthischangerequest:0QPs0ELEG=0PRQJ0QA0ENG0NMM0sAFETY0PRQTsERV0QTHERCIGHEM0l&c0PLANCIQc0scE0TRNGCIsEcuRITY0DoccNTL0QTHER0HP0MEGH0Ltc0sTAsCIFPCIwoRKcoNTRQLProcedure Number.ReturnFormTo:Rev.No.DateOrig.~~Req'dBy~~Dept.Pleasedocumentcommentsbelowandattachadditional sheetsasnecessary.

ItemNo.Page/Step No.ReviewerCommentsResponseorResolution

,0Ihaveperformed aTechnical Subcommittee Reviewpertherequirements ofQl-5-PSL-'t.

Reviewed/Approved By:Signature PrintPhoneDateThecommentsabovehavebeensatisfactorily resolved.

"Resolution Sign-Off:

Signature PrintDept.Date*CommentsthatcannotberesolvedbetweentheAuthorandtheReviewershouldbebroughttotheattention ofandresolvedbythenexthighestchainofcommand.Thissignature isONLYrequiredwhenthereviewerhascomments.

/R4 REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:92of106APPENDIX8COMPLETED PRE-OPERATIONAL TESTPROCEDURE FORM(Page1of1)TESTPROCEDURE TYPETESTPROCEDURE NUMBERREVISION1.TESTCONDUCTED BY;2.RESULTSREVIEWEDBY:3.RESULTSREVIEWEDBY:4.RESULTSACCEPTEDANDAPPROVEDBYDEPARTMENT HEAD:'5.SITEENGINEERING REVIEWEDBY:6.VENDORREPRESENTATIVE REVIEWEDBY:Date//Date/~Date//Date/~Date//Date~/7,TESTREVIEWEDBYFRG,DESIGNPARAMETERS

ACHIEVED, TESTSATISFACTORY, RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

Date/~FRG0FRGCHAIRMANINITIALS8.PLANTGENERALMANAGERAPPROVALDate/~

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 UNITNUMBERPageofPROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXHPRE-OPERATIONAL TESTSUMMARY(Page1of1)PRE-OPNUMBERSYSTEMENGINEERPAGE:93Of106DateRemarks REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXILETTEROFINSTRUCTION REQUESTFORM(Page1of2)PAGE:94Of1061.LetterofInstruction Title:LetterofInstruction Number:ReasonforRequest:PrintName:Dept:Phone:Signature:

2.ReviewEvaluation:

1.DoesthischangeaffecttheotherUnit'sinstruction, anotherequipment train,orchannel?IfYES,theresponsible department shallsubmitaPCR/TCfortheoppositeUnit'sinstruction, equipment train,orchannel,asapplicable.

(N/Aforunitcommoninstructions) 2.IsthischangetoaQ.l.orAdministrative Instruction?

IfYES,obtainQ.A.Manager/Designee review.3.IsthisaPCRforaMaintenance Instruction?

IfYES,obtainQ.C.review.YESNO~4.Doesthischangereference anynewchemical?

IfYES,obtainChemicalControlSupervisor review.5.Doesthischangealtertheorderofinitiating signalsofatest?IfYES,Engineering reviewforpotential toadversely impactdesignfunctions isrequired.

6.Doesthischangedeleteorchangeaprocedure number?IfYES,obtainOperations SupportSupervisor review.7.Doesthischangeaffecttheclearance procedure?

IfYES,obtainNuclearBusinessUnitJointSafetyCommittee (NBUJSC)Review.8.Isthischangeresulting fromaPC/MorSafetyEvaluation?

IfYES,verifythatthePC/M/SafetyEvaluation isFRGapproved.

/R4SOPSDATEDOCTPROCEDURE DOCNSYSCOMPCOMPLETED ITM

REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:95of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXILETTEROFINSTRUCTION REQUESTFORM(Page2of2)3.10CFR50.59Screening LLl0ujA10CFR50.59Screening shallbeperformed inaccordance withADM-17.11, 10CFR50.59Screening.

Uponcompletion, attachthedocumented resultstotheassociated LOIpackage.4.1.Wasthesubcommittee reviewperformed byqualified individuals?

2.IstheLOIvalidandtechnically correct?3.Arethechangesrelevanttoanytrainingprograms?

IfYES,identifythetargetpopulation oraffecteddepartments.

YESNO4.Dothechangesrequirepre-implementation training?

IfYES,completeandattachAppendixO.Dept.HeadSignature 5.ReviewedbyFacilityReviewGroupPrintDate~~NOTETheexpiration dateisoptionalfortheFRGtoset.Ifadateisnotspecified, thedatewillbeoneyearfromtheissuedate.FRGChairmanInitials:

FRGNo.:6.PlantGeneralManagerApprovalofFRGMinutesFRGSecretary:

/R4 A

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXJPERIODICREVIEWOFPLANTPROCEDURES (Page1of1)PAGE:96of106Procedure Title:Procedure Number:CurrentRevision:

1.Doesthepurposeoftheprocedure clearlystatealltheevolutions andtaskscontained intheprocedure?

YesNo2.Areplantconditions clearlyspecified fortaskswhichcouldaffectplantoperations oroperability?

3.Aretheprocesses delineated inthisprocedure inagreement withQualityInstructions?

4.Arepersonnel safetyissuesaddressed inthelimitsandprecautions sectionandintheappropriate areasofthebodyoftheinstructions?

5.Arereferences toplantorganizations contained inthisprocedure inaccordance withthosereferenced inorganizational QualityInstructions' 6.Areallrequiredrecordsspecified perQl17-PR/PSL-1, QualityAssurance Records?7.Areallcriticalstepsevaluated forproperuseofIndependent Verification inaccordance withADM-17.06?

'IfNotoanyoftheabovequestions, aProcedure ChangeRequestisrequired.

Completed by:Department Head:Date:~~Date://SOPSDATEDOCTDOCNsYsCOMPITM REVISIONNo.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:97of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXKPROCEDURE RESPONSIBILITY TRANSFER(Page1of1)Procedure NumberCurrentRev.No.TitleReasonforReuestDoesthisTransferofResponsibility affecttheprocedure type?YesNoIfyes,aPCRisnecessary.

~Rdd:NOTESignatures belowindicatetheresponsibility ofthisprocedure hasbeentransferred fromonedepartment toanother.CurrentResponsible Department Head:(Department Name)(Department HeadSignature)

NewResponsible Department Head:Date:~~(Department Name)(Department HeadSignature)

Date://

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE No.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXLUFSARUSERCOMMENTFORM(Page1of1)PagePAGE:98of106ofUFSARerrorsorimprovement suggestions shouldbeidentified belowbyUFSARUsersandforwarded toSiteEngineering Manager.Originator PlantPSLtPSL2UFSARAreasAffectedDeptLocationPhoneSectionsPtriuresCommentsAttachedBelowEnineerinReviewAcceptedDisposition:

Insufficient Information NoChangeRequiredAssignedUserComment¹Reviewing Engineer REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXMNEWGUIDELINE/INSTRUCTION REQUEST(Page1of1)PAGE:99of1061.Guideline Number.Title:BriefSummaryofRequest:(useadditional pages,ifnecessary)

OPlr..F'illThisdocumentmeetsthecriteriatobeaguideline/instruction.

RequestFRGconcurrence tomakethisdocumentaguidelinefinstruction.

Author.SIGNATUAEPAINTNAMEHEPT.PHONE2.10CFR50.59Screening A10CFR50.59Screening shallbeperformed inaccordance withADM-17.11, 10CFR50.59Screening.

Uponcompletion, attachthedocumented resultstothenewassociated guideline/instruction package.,ClThecontentofthisdocumentmeetstheguideline/instruction criteria.

Cl;ill,0ThisdocumentdoesNOTmeettheguideline/instruction criteria.

,Reviewedby:Signature PrintNameDate~~YESNODept.Head:3.Responsible Department Head1.Wasthesubcommittee reviewperformed byqualified individuals?

2.Isthecontenttechnically correct?3.Isthecontentofthisguidelinefinstruction relevanttoanytrainingprogram?IfYES,sendcopytoTrainingDepartment Library.4.Doesthisguideline/instruction requirepre-implementation training?

IfYES,completeAppendix0andconducttraininginaccordance withdepartmental trainingplans.Signature 4.ReviewedbyFacilityReviewGroupFRGChairmanInitials:

PrintFRG¹Dept.5.PlantGeneralManagerApprovalofFRGMinutesFRGSecretary:

/R4 REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE No.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:100of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXNGUIDELINE/INSTRUCTION CHANGEREQUEST(Page1of1)1.Guideline Number.CurrentRev.No.Title:BriefSummaryofRequest:(useadditional pages,ifnecessary)

Author.SIGNATURE 2.10CFR50.59Screening PRINTNAMEDEPT.PHONEA10CFR50.59Screening shallbeperformed inaccordance withADM-17.11, 10CFR50.59Screening.

Uponcompletion, attachthedocumented resultstotheassociated guideline/instruction changerequestpackage.0Thecontentofthisdocumentmeetstheguideline/instruction criteria.

0ThisdocumentdoesNOTmeettheguideline/instruction criteria.

(ReturntoAuthor)Reviewedby:Signature PrintNameDate~~"O'I.z.3.Responsible Department Head0Changesarevalidandtechnically correct.Pre-implementation trainingisrequiredforthischange'?CIYES0NOC3lfYES,pre-implementation traininghasbeencompleted inaccordance withtheDepartmental TrainingPlan.Thisguidelinefinstruction changeisapproved.

NOTElfthisisarevisiontoaguideline/instruction whichaffectsAccredited TrainingPrograms, thenroutethisrevisiontotheTrainingDepartment Library.Department Head:SIGNATURE PRINTDate:~~DEPT/R4 t

REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:101of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIX0PRE-IMPLEMENTATION TRAININGNOTIFICATION FORM(Page1of1)Procedure Title:Procedure Number.RevisionNo.TheInformation ServicesDepartment isherebyrequested todistribute theabovelistedprocedure tothefollowing personnel indicated forpre-implementation trainingwithacopyofthisformattached.

Pre-implementation trainingonthisprocedure isrequiredforthesegroups:0All0HumanResources ManagerQCorrective ActionGroupSupervisor QEngineering Manager0Operations Manager0PlantEngineerManagerOperations SupportSupervisor 0Op.SupportEng.Mgr.0HealthPhysicsSupervisor 0SystemEngineering Mgr.0Operations Supewisor 0Administrative SupewisorQChemistry Supervisor 0SewicesManagerQMaintenance Manager0Protection ServicesSupv.0Maintenance SewicesSupv.0SecuritySupewisor 0Mechanical Maintenance Supv.QTrainingManager0Electrical Maintenance Supv.QInformation SewicesSupv.0l&CMaintenance Supervisor 0SewicesProjectsSupv.0Predictive Maintenance Supv.0LandUtilization Supv.0Licensing Manager0WorkControlManager0BusinessSystemsManager0Materials Manager0Contracts 0Protection andControlSupv.0Management Inf.Systems0QualityManager0OtherPROCEDURE IMPLEMENTATION DUEDATE:~~DateDistributed byInformation Se'wice's toMariagers/Department Headsfor-Tiafning:

~PMAI¹Alloftherequirednotifications and/ordocumentmodifications willbecompleted bytheimplementation date.TheResponsible ManagerorDepartment Headshallensurebysigningthisformthatrequiredtrainingiscompletepriortoperformance ofactivities addressed bythisprocedure.

Isthischangeapplicable toALLofmypersonnel?

0YES0NoIsthischangeapplicable tomydocuments?

QYESQNoIsthischangeapplicable tosomeofmypersonnel?

QYESQNoListtheorganizational level(s)(e.g.,Mechanics, Journeyman) towhomtrainingwouldapply.TrainingrequiredforManager/Department Head.SIGNATURE PRINTTITLEPHONEDate~~

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:102of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTFIGURE1PROCEDURE CHANGEPROCESSFLOWPATHISTOAQlORADMINQUAUTYhssvRANcE PROCEDURE ISMh!NTENANCETHISAYESQUAUlYCONTROLPROCEDVREREVIEWCHEMICALCONTAOL YESTHISACHANGEISsvpETMsoR TOANYCHEMICALAEVIEWREFERENCES ENGINEEAING REVIEWDOESTHISCHANGEALTERTHEORDEROFINrrIATING TESTSDOESTHISCHANGEYESDELETEORCHANGEAPROCEDURE NUMBERTgA5080REVIEWANDMINORCHANGESCREENING SUBCOMMrrTEE REVIEWSREVIEWBYRESFONSIBIE PAOCGAOVPCOMPLETEAATTACHAPPENDIX0ISlRAIKINQREQUIREDBEFOREISSUANCEYESOFPAOCEDURDEPARTMENT HEADREVIEWSISTRAININOREQUIREDNORFYAPPIIOPRIATE TRAININQCOORDINATOR PROCESSING PAE.MPLEMENTATIO TRAININGREQUIREDDOCUMENTCONTROLHOIDWHILEPEAFORMINQ TRAININGTRAININQcoMpLETENUCLEAARECORDSVAULT(Q/-5-1A.

WPG)/R4 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:Ql-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:103of106FIGURE2UPGRADED/NEW PROCEDURE PROCESSFLOWPATHISISTHISAYESMAINTENANCE PROCEDURE OUAUIYCONTROLREVIEWCHEMICALCONTROLYESTHISACHANOESUPERVISOR TDANYCHEMICALREVIEWREFERENCES ENOINEERWO AEVIEWDOESTHISCHANOEALTERTHEORDEROFINIAATINO TESTSDOESTHISCHANODELETEORCHANOEAPROCEDURE NUMBER?SUSCOMMITTEE REVIEWRESPONSTILE PROCEDURE OROUPREVIEWCOMPLETEAATTACHAPPENDIX0ISTRAININOREOUIAEDBEFOREISSUANCEYESOFPAOCEDUADEPARTMENT HEADREVIEWISTRAININQREOUWEDNOTIFYAPPROPRIATE TRAINWQCOORDWATOR PROCEDURES TRACIONOPQMAPPROVALPRE.MPIEMENTATIO

?RAWWQREOIAREDDOCUMENTCONTROLHOIDWHIIEPERFORMINQ TRAIMNQTRAININQCOMPLETENUCLEARRECORDSVAULT(Q/-5-1E.

WPG)/R4 REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:104of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTFIGURE3LETTEROFINSTRUCTION PROCESSFLOWPATHISTHISCHANCEYESTOAOIORADMIN PROCEDURE TIISAYESMAINTENANCE PROCEDURE ISYKSTHISACHANCETOANYCHEMICALREFERENCES DOESTlOSCHANCEALlERTHEORDEROFUImATUIOTESTSDOESTHISCHANOEADEIETKORCHANCEAPROCEDURE NUMSERTOUAUFIEDREVIEWER5050SCREENING SUSCOMMITTKE REVIEWOPERATlONS SUPPORTSUPVREVIEWDEPARTMENT HEADRENEWPRE.IMPIEMEIRATIONTRAININORECUSEDHOLDWHILEPERfORMINO TRAININONUCIEARRECORDSVAULT(QI-5-1C.WPG)/R4 r;V REVISIONNO.:4PROCEDURE NO.:QI-5-PSL-1 PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:105of106FIGURE4PRE-OPERATIONAL TESTPROCEDURE PROCESSFLOWPATHTOMAKECHANGESTOAPRENPERATIONAL PROCEDURE REFERTOFIGURE1.TOWRITEANEWPRM)PERATIONAL PROCEDURE REFERTOFIGURE2.PRENPERATIONAL TESTCONDUCTED DEPARTMENT HEADREVIEWISPALPYESRE&TEDENGINEERIIIG NOISYESVENDORREVIEWREQUIREDVENDORREVIEWTESTPACKAGETOFRGACCEPTEDNOTAKENECESSARY ACTIONSYESPGMAPPROVALACCEPTEDYESPREAMPCOMPLETETAKENECESSARY ACTIONSNUCLEARRECORDSVAULT(QI51D.WPG REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:PREPARATION,

REVISION, REVIEW/APPROVAL OFPROCEDURES PAGE:106of106QI-5-PSL-1 ST.LUCIEPLANTFIGURE5oemGuIOELIWEJIWSTRueVIOW rROCESSFLOWrATHDOESTHEDOCUMEMEETTHENOGUIDEUNEIINSTRUCTION PROCEDURE CRITERIAPROCESSYESAUTHORORIGINATES QUALIFIED REVIEWER50.59REVIEWSUBCOMMITTEE REVIEWDEPARTMENT HEADREVIEWSINFOSERVFORNO.ASSIGNMENT ANDTRACKINGGROUPTRACKINGDOESTHEDOCUMENOMEETTHEGUIDEUNE/INSTRUCTIOCRITERIAYESPGMAPPROVALLOGANDRETURNTOORIGINATOR WORDPROCESSING DISTRIBUTION TODEPARTMENT (QI51B.WF'G) 8t~iJd(tAy'

ML17229A593: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:39, 29 June 2018

Contents

Text

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

6.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

67.0REFERENCES

67.0REFERENCES

67.0REFERENCES

Navigation menu

ML17229A593: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:39, 29 June 2018

Text

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

6.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

5.0 INSTRUCTIONS

67.0REFERENCES

67.0REFERENCES

67.0REFERENCES

Navigation menu

Search