ML17249A406: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION | {{#Wiki_filter:SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION | ||
September 6, 2017 | |||
September 6, 2017 | |||
| Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
341 White Pond Drive | 341 White Pond Drive | ||
Mail Stop: A-WAC-B1 | Mail Stop: A-WAC-B1 | ||
Akron, OH 44320 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO YOUR APPEAL OF THE FORMAL DISAGREEMENT WITH ADVERSARY CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED | Akron, OH 44320 | ||
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO YOUR APPEAL OF THE FORMAL DISAGREEMENT WITH ADVERSARY CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED | |||
OR PREPARED AS PART OF AN NRC-EVALUATED FORCE-ON-FORCE | OR PREPARED AS PART OF AN NRC-EVALUATED FORCE-ON-FORCE | ||
EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM 05000346/2017201-01 AND 05000346/2017201-02 Dear Mr. Ellis: | EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM 05000346/2017201-01 AND | ||
The Division of Security Operations (DSO) has received your letter, dated September 1, 2017, appealing the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's decision to continue to use two tactics, techniques, or procedures (TTP) planned for the Davis-Besse force-on-force exercise. Your original dispute was | 05000346/2017201-02 | ||
Dear Mr. Ellis: | |||
The Division of Security Operations (DSO) has received your letter, dated September 1, 2017, appealing the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
(NRC) staff's decision to continue to use two tactics, techniques, or procedures (TTP) planned for the Davis-Besse force-on-force exercise. Your original dispute was submi | |||
tted on August 29, 2017, and the NRC staff's initial decision was issued on August 31, 2017. | |||
In your original submittals, you disputed a TTP within Scenario 1 and 2 developed by the NRC force-on-force inspection team. I have carefully reviewed your appeal to the initial decision, and concluded that the disputed TTP is approved for use within the NRC-evaluated scenario for the following reasons: (1) it is within the design basis threat, (2) it is supported by available data, | In your original submittals, you disputed a TTP within Scenario 1 and 2 developed by the NRC force-on-force inspection team. I have carefully reviewed your appeal to the initial decision, and concluded that the disputed TTP is approved for use within the NRC-evaluated scenario for the following reasons: (1) it is within the design basis threat, (2) it is supported by available data, | ||
(3) it is within your ability to provide defense-in-depth, (4) it can be safely performed and | (3) it is within your ability to provide defense-in-depth, (4) it can be safely performed and | ||
controlled, and (5) it provides a credible and realistic challenge to your site's protective strategy. | controlled, and (5) it provides a credible and realistic challenge to your site's protective strategy. | ||
The NRC's detailed response to your appeal has been entered into the NRC Response to Disputed Item Database, Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-01 and Disputed Item | The NRC's detailed response to your appeal has been entered into the NRC Response to Disputed Item Database, Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-01 and Disputed Item | ||
05000346/2017201-02, and is provided as an Enclosure to this letter, marked Safeguards | 05000346/2017201-02, and is provided as an Enclosure to this letter, marked Safeguards | ||
Information. The enclosure transmitted herewith contains Safeguards Information. When separated from the enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled. | Information. The enclosure transmitted herewith contains Safeguards Information. When separated from the enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled. | ||
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION J. Ellis 2 SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION Upon notification by Robert Johnson, Branch Chief, Security Performance Evaluation Branch, DSO, of the NRC's decision that the disputed TTP was approved for use, you requested to | SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION | ||
J. Ellis 2 | |||
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION | |||
Upon notification by Robert Johnson, Branch Chief, Security Performance Evaluation Branch, DSO, of the NRC's decision that the disputed TTP was approved for use, you requested to | |||
appeal the decision to me. I received your appeal via e-mail on September 5, 2017. After | appeal the decision to me. I received your appeal via e-mail on September 5, 2017. After | ||
further discussion, the NRC carefully reevaluated your dispute and determined that the disputed | further discussion, the NRC carefully reevaluated your dispute and determined that the disputed | ||
item is still appropriate for use in an NRC-evaluated force-on-force exercise. Sincerely, /RA/ | |||
item is still appropriate for use in an NRC-evaluated force-on-force exercise. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Marissa G. Bailey, Director | Marissa G. Bailey, Director | ||
Division of Security Operations | Division of Security Operations | ||
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response | Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response | ||
Enclosure: | Enclosure: | ||
NRC Response to Disputed Item | NRC Response to Disputed Item | ||
05000346/2017201-01 and 05000346/2017201-02 | 05000346/2017201-01 and 05000346/2017201-02 | ||
cc w/enclosure: William Willis, Manager, Site Security | cc w/enclosure: William Willis, Manager, Site Security | ||
Revision as of 14:56, 29 June 2018
| ML17249A406 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 09/06/2017 |
| From: | Bailey M G Division of Security Operations |
| To: | Ellis J D - No Known Affiliation |
| Josh Berry | |
| References | |
| 2017201-01, 2017201-02 | |
| Download: ML17249A406 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000346/2017201
Text
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
September 6, 2017
Mr. James D. Ellis Director, Fleet Security Program
341 White Pond Drive
Mail Stop: A-WAC-B1
Akron, OH 44320
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO YOUR APPEAL OF THE FORMAL DISAGREEMENT WITH ADVERSARY CHARACTERISTICS, ATTRIBUTES, OR TACTICS EMPLOYED
OR PREPARED AS PART OF AN NRC-EVALUATED FORCE-ON-FORCE
EXERCISE - DISPUTED ITEM 05000346/2017201-01 AND 05000346/2017201-02
Dear Mr. Ellis:
The Division of Security Operations (DSO) has received your letter, dated September 1, 2017, appealing the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) staff's decision to continue to use two tactics, techniques, or procedures (TTP) planned for the Davis-Besse force-on-force exercise. Your original dispute was submi
tted on August 29, 2017, and the NRC staff's initial decision was issued on August 31, 2017.
In your original submittals, you disputed a TTP within Scenario 1 and 2 developed by the NRC force-on-force inspection team. I have carefully reviewed your appeal to the initial decision, and concluded that the disputed TTP is approved for use within the NRC-evaluated scenario for the following reasons: (1) it is within the design basis threat, (2) it is supported by available data,
(3) it is within your ability to provide defense-in-depth, (4) it can be safely performed and
controlled, and (5) it provides a credible and realistic challenge to your site's protective strategy.
The NRC's detailed response to your appeal has been entered into the NRC Response to Disputed Item Database, Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-01 and Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-02, and is provided as an Enclosure to this letter, marked Safeguards
Information. The enclosure transmitted herewith contains Safeguards Information. When separated from the enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled.
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
J. Ellis 2
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
Upon notification by Robert Johnson, Branch Chief, Security Performance Evaluation Branch, DSO, of the NRC's decision that the disputed TTP was approved for use, you requested to
appeal the decision to me. I received your appeal via e-mail on September 5, 2017. After
further discussion, the NRC carefully reevaluated your dispute and determined that the disputed
item is still appropriate for use in an NRC-evaluated force-on-force exercise.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Marissa G. Bailey, Director
Division of Security Operations
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
Enclosure:
NRC Response to Disputed Item 05000346/2017201-01 and 05000346/2017201-02
cc w/enclosure: William Willis, Manager, Site Security
ML17249A406 OFFICE NSIR/DSO/SPEB NSIR/DSO/SPEB NSIR/DSO NAME J. Berry C. Johnson M. Bailey DATE 9/ 6 /17 9 / 6 /17 9 / 6 /17