ML14135A509: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| page count = 20 | | page count = 20 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:Enclosure 1BSEP 14-0048Duke Energy Presentation -Brunswick MELLLA+ Methods Applicability,Pre-Application Meeting,April 17, 2014 Brunswick MELLLA+Pre-Application MeetingAREVA MELLLA+ Methods ApplicabilityApril 17, 2014DUKE'~ENERGY. | |||
Brnwc LA+ Mehd Appiablt* Duke Participants* Roger Thomas" Bill Murray* Charles Stroupe(Presenter)* Greg Westmoreland* John Siphers* AREVA Participants* Dan Tinkler.Alan MeginnismmK2 Agenda" Schedule* Introduction and Objectives* Fuel and plant licensing analysis strategy* AREVA MELLLA+ Methods ApplicabilitySummaryDUKEENERY.3 Schedule* MELLLA+ LAR submittal (both Units)* B1C19 sample problem with ATRIUMTM 1OXM" B1C21 cycle specific application results to NRC* First planned MELLLA+ cycle" MELLLA+ requested approval (both Units)Fall 2014December 2015Spring 2016* MELLLA+ implementation* During B1C21 refueling outageSpring 2016DLUKEENERGY.4 On January 8, 2013 Duke energy presented a pre-application meeting with the NRC. (ML13007A373)* Benefits of MELLLA+* Approach to fuel and licensing analysis strategies* Thermal hydraulic stability solution (AREVA's Enhanced Option Ill)* Containment Accident Pressure (CAP)* Anticipated Transient Without SCRAM analysis* MELLLA+ impacts* Several follow up pre-application meetings were proposed.* The NRC requested "The licensee should justify the use andapplicability of the GEH generic MELLLA+ LTR to the AREVAapproaches and the use of AREVA fuel assemblies."(ML13016A014)DUKE5 ENERGY. | |||
* On 8/20/13 a pre-application meeting was conducted whichfocused primarily on GEH methods applicability to AREVAfuel (ML13327A037 and ML13327A038)GEH A10XM Core Modeling* GEH ATWS A1OXM Modeling* Overview of AREVA Methods Applicability Report* Today's meeting will provide more detail on AREVA'smethods applicability to BSEP MELLLA+ conditionsDUKE6 " ENERGY. | |||
Introduction and ObjectivesMELLLA+ overview...... .. ..I Brunswick MELLLA+ Power Flow Map120.0110.0100.090.080.070.060.050.040.030.020.010.00.0e-" i- M LL9 A_+ R g oMELLL Line\7 ,0.007.7 15.4 23.1 30.8 38.5 46.2 53.9 61.6 69.3 77.0 84.7 92.4 Mlbs/hr Core Flow10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 % Core FlowDUKE7 ' ENERGY. | |||
* All topical areas of the MELLLA+ LTR will beaddressed in the LAR* Duke Energy will address:" SAR Integration of GEH and AREVA input" APRM and Enhanced Option III setpoints andimplementation" Risk evaluation, procedure updates, operator training" Plant changes to mitigate ATWS (SLC B-1 0enrichment increase)" Selected non-fuel impacts8DUKEENERGY. | |||
* GEH MELLLA+ LTR process (NEDC-33006P-A)with GEH methodologies and analyses willaddress:" Non-fuel impacts" Long term ATWS and ATWS instability explicitlymodeling ATRIUMTM 1OXM fuel9 DUKE9 '~ENERGY. | |||
Fuel Iplan strteg* AREVA methodologies and analyses willaddress:* Fuel, core design, COLR fuel limits, LOCA, DBA* ATWS and ASME overpressure" Enhanced Option III (EO-Ill) stability solution10 10 ENERGY. | |||
* AREVA will present information on methods applicabilityto the BSEP" AREVA will provide a methods applicability report specific toBSEP MELLLA+ conditions" Enhanced Option III" AREVA application of fuel specific limitations and conditions fromthe generic MELLLA+ topical NEDO-33006A1XDKE11 t~ ENERGY. | |||
* AREVA proprietary presentation will be given at this pointin the presentation12DKE12 ENERGY. | |||
* AREVA methods are applicable to Brunswick MELLLA+conditions* Methods applicability report will be submitted with LAR* Steady state and transient neutronic and thermal-hydraulic analyticalmethods and code systems supporting MELLLA+ will be appliedwithin NRC approved applicability ranges4 The assessment database and uncertainty of models used tosimulate the plant response at MELLLA+ conditions are equivalent tocore and assembly conditions for which the AREVA methodology wasbenchmarked* AREVA analyses will comply with the fuel-specific limitations andconditions from the generic MELLLA+ SE to NEDO-33006ADiKE13 t ENERGY. | |||
Brnwc LA+ Mtos. ApplcablitQuestions?@ENERGY.14 Selected AcronymsASME -American Society of Mechanical EngineersATWS -Anticipated Transient Without ScramBSEP -Brunswick Steam Electric PlantCAP -Containment Accident PressureCOLR -Core Operating Limits ReportDBA -Design Basis AccidentsEO-Ill -Enhanced Option IIIGEH -General Electric HitachiLAR -License Amendment RequestLOCA -Loss of Coolant AnalysisLTR -License Topical ReportMELLLA- Maximum Extended Load Line LimitAnalysisMELLLA+ -Maximum Extended Load Line LimitAnalysis PlusSAR -Safety Analysis ReportSE -Safety EvaluationSLC -Standby Liquid Control~tENERGY.15 BSEP 14-0048AREVA AffidavitRegarding Withholding Presentation onAREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability AFFIDAVITSTATE OF WASHINGTON )) ss.COUNTY OF BENTON )1. My name is Alan B. Meginnis. I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVAInc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA to determine whether certainAREVA information is proprietary. I am familiar with the policies established byAREVA to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA information contained in the presentationentitled, "AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability," dated April 17, 2014 and referred to hereinas "Document." Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA asproprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA for the control and protectionof proprietary and confidential information.4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential natureand is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA and not made available to thepublic. Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of thekind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.5. This Document has been made available to the U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document bewithheld from public disclosure. The request for withholding of proprietary information is madein accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financialinformation."6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA to determine whetherinformation should be classified as proprietary:(a) The information reveals details of AREVA's research and development plansand programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor tosignificantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce,or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning aprocess, methodology, or component, the application of which results in acompetitive advantage for AREVA.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process,methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides acompetitive advantage for AREVA in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA, would behelpful to competitors to AREVA, and would likely cause substantial harm tothe competitive position of AREVA.The information in the Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth inparagraphs 6(b), 6(d) and 6(e) above.7. In accordance with AREVA's policies governing the protection and control ofinformation, proprietary information contained in this Document have been made available, on alimited basis, to others outside AREVA only as required and under suitable agreement providingfor nondisclosure and limited use of the information.8. AREVA policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file orarea and distributed on a need-to-know basis. | |||
: 9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me this / 0 14-day of -,2014..: U-O r,,Susan K. McCoy " 2NGTONNOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF WAS-TGTONMY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 1/14/2016}} |
Revision as of 13:06, 28 June 2018
ML14135A509 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Brunswick ![]() |
Issue date: | 04/17/2014 |
From: | Duke Energy Carolinas |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
Shared Package | |
ML14136A059 | List: |
References | |
BSEP 14-0048 | |
Download: ML14135A509 (20) | |
Text
Enclosure 1BSEP 14-0048Duke Energy Presentation -Brunswick MELLLA+ Methods Applicability,Pre-Application Meeting,April 17, 2014 Brunswick MELLLA+Pre-Application MeetingAREVA MELLLA+ Methods ApplicabilityApril 17, 2014DUKE'~ENERGY.
Brnwc LA+ Mehd Appiablt* Duke Participants* Roger Thomas" Bill Murray* Charles Stroupe(Presenter)* Greg Westmoreland* John Siphers* AREVA Participants* Dan Tinkler.Alan MeginnismmK2 Agenda" Schedule* Introduction and Objectives* Fuel and plant licensing analysis strategy* AREVA MELLLA+ Methods ApplicabilitySummaryDUKEENERY.3 Schedule* MELLLA+ LAR submittal (both Units)* B1C19 sample problem with ATRIUMTM 1OXM" B1C21 cycle specific application results to NRC* First planned MELLLA+ cycle" MELLLA+ requested approval (both Units)Fall 2014December 2015Spring 2016* MELLLA+ implementation* During B1C21 refueling outageSpring 2016DLUKEENERGY.4 On January 8, 2013 Duke energy presented a pre-application meeting with the NRC. (ML13007A373)* Benefits of MELLLA+* Approach to fuel and licensing analysis strategies* Thermal hydraulic stability solution (AREVA's Enhanced Option Ill)* Containment Accident Pressure (CAP)* Anticipated Transient Without SCRAM analysis* MELLLA+ impacts* Several follow up pre-application meetings were proposed.* The NRC requested "The licensee should justify the use andapplicability of the GEH generic MELLLA+ LTR to the AREVAapproaches and the use of AREVA fuel assemblies."(ML13016A014)DUKE5 ENERGY.
- On 8/20/13 a pre-application meeting was conducted whichfocused primarily on GEH methods applicability to AREVAfuel (ML13327A037 and ML13327A038)GEH A10XM Core Modeling* GEH ATWS A1OXM Modeling* Overview of AREVA Methods Applicability Report* Today's meeting will provide more detail on AREVA'smethods applicability to BSEP MELLLA+ conditionsDUKE6 " ENERGY.
Introduction and ObjectivesMELLLA+ overview...... .. ..I Brunswick MELLLA+ Power Flow Map120.0110.0100.090.080.070.060.050.040.030.020.010.00.0e-" i- M LL9 A_+ R g oMELLL Line\7 ,0.007.7 15.4 23.1 30.8 38.5 46.2 53.9 61.6 69.3 77.0 84.7 92.4 Mlbs/hr Core Flow10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 % Core FlowDUKE7 ' ENERGY.
- All topical areas of the MELLLA+ LTR will beaddressed in the LAR* Duke Energy will address:" SAR Integration of GEH and AREVA input" APRM and Enhanced Option III setpoints andimplementation" Risk evaluation, procedure updates, operator training" Plant changes to mitigate ATWS (SLC B-1 0enrichment increase)" Selected non-fuel impacts8DUKEENERGY.
- GEH MELLLA+ LTR process (NEDC-33006P-A)with GEH methodologies and analyses willaddress:" Non-fuel impacts" Long term ATWS and ATWS instability explicitlymodeling ATRIUMTM 1OXM fuel9 DUKE9 '~ENERGY.
Fuel Iplan strteg* AREVA methodologies and analyses willaddress:* Fuel, core design, COLR fuel limits, LOCA, DBA* ATWS and ASME overpressure" Enhanced Option III (EO-Ill) stability solution10 10 ENERGY.
- AREVA will present information on methods applicabilityto the BSEP" AREVA will provide a methods applicability report specific toBSEP MELLLA+ conditions" Enhanced Option III" AREVA application of fuel specific limitations and conditions fromthe generic MELLLA+ topical NEDO-33006A1XDKE11 t~ ENERGY.
- AREVA proprietary presentation will be given at this pointin the presentation12DKE12 ENERGY.
- AREVA methods are applicable to Brunswick MELLLA+conditions* Methods applicability report will be submitted with LAR* Steady state and transient neutronic and thermal-hydraulic analyticalmethods and code systems supporting MELLLA+ will be appliedwithin NRC approved applicability ranges4 The assessment database and uncertainty of models used tosimulate the plant response at MELLLA+ conditions are equivalent tocore and assembly conditions for which the AREVA methodology wasbenchmarked* AREVA analyses will comply with the fuel-specific limitations andconditions from the generic MELLLA+ SE to NEDO-33006ADiKE13 t ENERGY.
Brnwc LA+ Mtos. ApplcablitQuestions?@ENERGY.14 Selected AcronymsASME -American Society of Mechanical EngineersATWS -Anticipated Transient Without ScramBSEP -Brunswick Steam Electric PlantCAP -Containment Accident PressureCOLR -Core Operating Limits ReportDBA -Design Basis AccidentsEO-Ill -Enhanced Option IIIGEH -General Electric HitachiLAR -License Amendment RequestLOCA -Loss of Coolant AnalysisLTR -License Topical ReportMELLLA- Maximum Extended Load Line LimitAnalysisMELLLA+ -Maximum Extended Load Line LimitAnalysis PlusSAR -Safety Analysis ReportSE -Safety EvaluationSLC -Standby Liquid Control~tENERGY.15 BSEP 14-0048AREVA AffidavitRegarding Withholding Presentation onAREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability AFFIDAVITSTATE OF WASHINGTON )) ss.COUNTY OF BENTON )1. My name is Alan B. Meginnis. I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVAInc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA to determine whether certainAREVA information is proprietary. I am familiar with the policies established byAREVA to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA information contained in the presentationentitled, "AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability," dated April 17, 2014 and referred to hereinas "Document." Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA asproprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA for the control and protectionof proprietary and confidential information.4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential natureand is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA and not made available to thepublic. Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of thekind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.5. This Document has been made available to the U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document bewithheld from public disclosure. The request for withholding of proprietary information is madein accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financialinformation."6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA to determine whetherinformation should be classified as proprietary:(a) The information reveals details of AREVA's research and development plansand programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor tosignificantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce,or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning aprocess, methodology, or component, the application of which results in acompetitive advantage for AREVA.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process,methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides acompetitive advantage for AREVA in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA, would behelpful to competitors to AREVA, and would likely cause substantial harm tothe competitive position of AREVA.The information in the Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth inparagraphs 6(b), 6(d) and 6(e) above.7. In accordance with AREVA's policies governing the protection and control ofinformation, proprietary information contained in this Document have been made available, on alimited basis, to others outside AREVA only as required and under suitable agreement providingfor nondisclosure and limited use of the information.8. AREVA policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file orarea and distributed on a need-to-know basis.
- 9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge,information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me this / 0 14-day of -,2014..: U-O r,,Susan K. McCoy " 2NGTONNOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF WAS-TGTONMY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 1/14/2016