ML15237A262: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Cindy Bladey I Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN-12 H08 ......;c~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i Washington, DC 205 55-0001.......I" .......Docket ID NRC-2009-0552 Comments on Pacific Gas & Electric proposal to re-license the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power PlantI very strongly oppose the proposal to renew the Pacific Gas & Electric license for the DiabloCanyon Nuclear Power Plant. Given the fact that PG&E was unaware of the extent of earthquakefaults under or adjacent to the site ("13 intersecting earthquake faults in a tsunami zone onCalifornia's coast north of Santa Barbara" http://nonukesca.net/?p=616) when the Diablo Canyonnuclear power plant was designed, sited, and built, that alone should be cause to dismiss theapplication for an extension of the aging plant. Japan's experience of the Fukushima disasterdemonstrates why the NRC should undertake immediately the closure of the Diablo Canyon plant,similarly located on the coast of the Pacific Ocean adjacent to earthquake faults. Even if the planthad been sited in a less dangerous location, by now its age alone warrants its closure. The NRCitself lists the Diablo Canyon Unit 1 as one of the five worst embrittled pressurized water reactorsin the U.S.In addition, its archaic cooling system does not meet California's 2010 policy mandate that coastalpower plants put in place less destructive cooling systems. It takes an estimated 2.5 billion gallonsof ocean water per day, returning it to the ocean 20 degrees hotter, killing untold numbers of fishand adding to the huge problem of warming oceans.It is time for the NRC to respect the 1976 California law to prohibit further investment in nuclearenergy until such time as a permanent, secure storage of radioactive waste is devised. Since the'US is further than ever from a permanent, reliably safe solution for storing radioactive waste, itwould be grossly irresponsible for the NRC to renew the license for this aged-out power plant.The discovery of how 13 earthquake faults intersect at or near the site, not known when the plantwas designed, and the absence of a permanent storage of the radioactive waste the plantcontinues to produce provide more than sufficient reason to reject the renewal proposal and toclose this aged plant now. The potential horrific consequences to the people and the state ofCalifornia if the plant's license were renewed can now be readily envisioned as we see the extent ofongoing damage wrought by the Fukushima disaster.Sincerely,Charlene M. Woodcock SUNSI Review Complete2355 Virginia Street Template = ADM -013Berkeley CA 94709 E-RIDS= ADM-03 , ,Add=}}

Revision as of 14:42, 6 June 2018

Comment (10) of Charlene M. Woodcock Opposing on Pacific Gas & Electric Proposal to Re-license the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant
ML15237A262
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/07/2015
From: Woodcock C M
- No Known Affiliation
To: Bladey C K
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
80FR37664 00010, NRC-2009-0552
Download: ML15237A262 (1)
v • d • e


Text

Cindy Bladey I Office of Administration, Mail Stop: OWFN-12 H08 ......;c~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i Washington, DC 205 55-0001.......I" .......Docket ID NRC-2009-0552 Comments on Pacific Gas & Electric proposal to re-license the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power PlantI very strongly oppose the proposal to renew the Pacific Gas & Electric license for the DiabloCanyon Nuclear Power Plant. Given the fact that PG&E was unaware of the extent of earthquakefaults under or adjacent to the site ("13 intersecting earthquake faults in a tsunami zone onCalifornia's coast north of Santa Barbara" http://nonukesca.net/?p=616) when the Diablo Canyonnuclear power plant was designed, sited, and built, that alone should be cause to dismiss theapplication for an extension of the aging plant. Japan's experience of the Fukushima disasterdemonstrates why the NRC should undertake immediately the closure of the Diablo Canyon plant,similarly located on the coast of the Pacific Ocean adjacent to earthquake faults. Even if the planthad been sited in a less dangerous location, by now its age alone warrants its closure. The NRCitself lists the Diablo Canyon Unit 1 as one of the five worst embrittled pressurized water reactorsin the U.S.In addition, its archaic cooling system does not meet California's 2010 policy mandate that coastalpower plants put in place less destructive cooling systems. It takes an estimated 2.5 billion gallonsof ocean water per day, returning it to the ocean 20 degrees hotter, killing untold numbers of fishand adding to the huge problem of warming oceans.It is time for the NRC to respect the 1976 California law to prohibit further investment in nuclearenergy until such time as a permanent, secure storage of radioactive waste is devised. Since the'US is further than ever from a permanent, reliably safe solution for storing radioactive waste, itwould be grossly irresponsible for the NRC to renew the license for this aged-out power plant.The discovery of how 13 earthquake faults intersect at or near the site, not known when the plantwas designed, and the absence of a permanent storage of the radioactive waste the plantcontinues to produce provide more than sufficient reason to reject the renewal proposal and toclose this aged plant now. The potential horrific consequences to the people and the state ofCalifornia if the plant's license were renewed can now be readily envisioned as we see the extent ofongoing damage wrought by the Fukushima disaster.Sincerely,Charlene M. Woodcock SUNSI Review Complete2355 Virginia Street Template = ADM -013Berkeley CA 94709 E-RIDS= ADM-03 , ,Add=

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15237A262&oldid=703296"