ML15282A302: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:9/1/20159/1/015N RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0040.htmlAs of:. 9/1/15 4:44 PMReceived" Ailmlst 23 2015PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: PendingPostTracking No. 1jz-8kpx-w28hComments Due: August 31, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2009-0552Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear PowerPlant LicenseComment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Ing~a.ctStatement c9X' "Document: NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0040 /, 7-Comment on FR Doc # 2015-15921 " (37f-5Submitter Information ,iiIName: Coni Jane ":'07C!),General CommentI'm a voice of just concern: I ABSOLUTELY oppose the re-licensing of the Diablo Canyon PowerPlant. From where I am standing, on well-informed ground, I can know that our planet's continuingwith human life is dwindling in reality. We have absolutely fucked all over this planet and there islittle we can do to change that immediately. One thing we really can do is NOT support things likenuclear power plants at this day and in this age. We have available to us epic proportions ofhealthful and sustainable power-producing methods and practices and there is VERY little reasonto not employ the myriad options available at this time. Wind, solar, hydro, magnetic, etc. We arepowerful and technologies have increased in reliability and diversity. Let us invest in a future inthese sustainable and intelligent ways, not a signed death sentence by way of supporting even morenuclear power plants. (Especially one nestled right along California's coast where thirteen differentand active fault lines are stretched.) I do NOT support the re-licensing of the Diablo Canyon PowerPlant. Not one cell of my body, nor my imagination feels otherwise.SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate = ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add= A Z-ce) file:lllC :/U sers/CAG/D ownl oads/N RC-2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0040.html I/1/1 9/1/20159/1/015N RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0040.htmlAs of:. 9/1/15 4:44 PMReceived" Ailmlst 23 2015PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: PendingPostTracking No. 1jz-8kpx-w28hComments Due: August 31, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2009-0552Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear PowerPlant LicenseComment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Ing~a.ctStatement c9X' "Document: NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0040 /, 7-Comment on FR Doc # 2015-15921 " (37f-5Submitter Information ,iiIName: Coni Jane ":'07C!),General CommentI'm a voice of just concern: I ABSOLUTELY oppose the re-licensing of the Diablo Canyon PowerPlant. From where I am standing, on well-informed ground, I can know that our planet's continuingwith human life is dwindling in reality. We have absolutely fucked all over this planet and there islittle we can do to change that immediately. One thing we really can do is NOT support things likenuclear power plants at this day and in this age. We have available to us epic proportions ofhealthful and sustainable power-producing methods and practices and there is VERY little reasonto not employ the myriad options available at this time. Wind, solar, hydro, magnetic, etc. We arepowerful and technologies have increased in reliability and diversity. Let us invest in a future inthese sustainable and intelligent ways, not a signed death sentence by way of supporting even morenuclear power plants. (Especially one nestled right along California's coast where thirteen differentand active fault lines are stretched.) I do NOT support the re-licensing of the Diablo Canyon PowerPlant. Not one cell of my body, nor my imagination feels otherwise.SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate = ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add= A Z-ce) file:lllC :/U sers/CAG/D ownl oads/N RC-2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0040.html I/1/1}}

Revision as of 05:00, 6 June 2018

Comment (47) by Cori Jane Opposing Re-Licensing of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant
ML15282A302
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/23/2015
From: Jane C
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
80FR37664 00047, NRC-2009-0552
Download: ML15282A302 (1)


Text

9/1/20159/1/015N RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0040.htmlAs of:. 9/1/15 4:44 PMReceived" Ailmlst 23 2015PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: PendingPostTracking No. 1jz-8kpx-w28hComments Due: August 31, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2009-0552Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear PowerPlant LicenseComment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Ing~a.ctStatement c9X' "Document: NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0040 /, 7-Comment on FR Doc # 2015-15921 " (37f-5Submitter Information ,iiIName: Coni Jane ":'07C!),General CommentI'm a voice of just concern: I ABSOLUTELY oppose the re-licensing of the Diablo Canyon PowerPlant. From where I am standing, on well-informed ground, I can know that our planet's continuingwith human life is dwindling in reality. We have absolutely fucked all over this planet and there islittle we can do to change that immediately. One thing we really can do is NOT support things likenuclear power plants at this day and in this age. We have available to us epic proportions ofhealthful and sustainable power-producing methods and practices and there is VERY little reasonto not employ the myriad options available at this time. Wind, solar, hydro, magnetic, etc. We arepowerful and technologies have increased in reliability and diversity. Let us invest in a future inthese sustainable and intelligent ways, not a signed death sentence by way of supporting even morenuclear power plants. (Especially one nestled right along California's coast where thirteen differentand active fault lines are stretched.) I do NOT support the re-licensing of the Diablo Canyon PowerPlant. Not one cell of my body, nor my imagination feels otherwise.SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate = ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add= A Z-ce) file:lllC :/U sers/CAG/D ownl oads/N RC-2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0040.html I/1/1 9/1/20159/1/015N RC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0040.htmlAs of:. 9/1/15 4:44 PMReceived" Ailmlst 23 2015PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: PendingPostTracking No. 1jz-8kpx-w28hComments Due: August 31, 2015Submission Type: WebDocket: NRC-2009-0552Notice of Receipt and Availability of Application for Renewal of Diablo Canyon Nuclear PowerPlant LicenseComment On: NRC-2009-0552-0026Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Ing~a.ctStatement c9X' "Document: NRC-2009-0552-DRAFT-0040 /, 7-Comment on FR Doc # 2015-15921 " (37f-5Submitter Information ,iiIName: Coni Jane ":'07C!),General CommentI'm a voice of just concern: I ABSOLUTELY oppose the re-licensing of the Diablo Canyon PowerPlant. From where I am standing, on well-informed ground, I can know that our planet's continuingwith human life is dwindling in reality. We have absolutely fucked all over this planet and there islittle we can do to change that immediately. One thing we really can do is NOT support things likenuclear power plants at this day and in this age. We have available to us epic proportions ofhealthful and sustainable power-producing methods and practices and there is VERY little reasonto not employ the myriad options available at this time. Wind, solar, hydro, magnetic, etc. We arepowerful and technologies have increased in reliability and diversity. Let us invest in a future inthese sustainable and intelligent ways, not a signed death sentence by way of supporting even morenuclear power plants. (Especially one nestled right along California's coast where thirteen differentand active fault lines are stretched.) I do NOT support the re-licensing of the Diablo Canyon PowerPlant. Not one cell of my body, nor my imagination feels otherwise.SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate = ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add= A Z-ce) file:lllC :/U sers/CAG/D ownl oads/N RC-2009- 0552- DRAFT- 0040.html I/1/1