ML17207A676: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL/LAW FIRM TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, LEGAL/LAW FIRM TO NRC
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1131N.E.86StreetMiami,Fla.33138November27,1979AtomicSafetyLicensingandAppealBoardMichaelC.Farrar,Esq.,ChairmanRichardS.Salzman,Esq.Dr.W.ReedJohnsonIntheMatterofFloridaPowerandLightCompany(St.LucieNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2)DocketNo.50-389
==DearMembersoftheBoard,==
IntervenorswishtoadvisethepartiesandmembersoftheBoardthatforgoodandsufficientreasontheypresentlywillnotbeabletopresentthedirecttestimonyofRobertPollardoftheUnionofConcernedScientistsatthehearingscheduledforDec.11,1979.Intervenorswillparticipateandwillpresenttheircasethroughcrossexaminationandinterrogatories.IntervenorshadadvisedcounselfortheStaffandtheapplicantinformallybytelephonepriortotheNov.16,1979deadlineforfilingwrittentestimony,thatthiswouldbethelikelyoutcomeofanyeffortbytheIntervenorstopresentMr.Pollard'stestimonyinadirectcase.TheIntervenor+furtheradvisedthepartiescounselthattheirdecisionnottopresentdirecttestimonywassubjecttoreviewuponexaminationoftestimonyofPatrickW.BaranowskytobefiledbytheStaffonNov.9,1979andwhichwasreceivedbytheIntervenorsforthefirsttimeFriday,Nov.16,1979.ThattestimonyisnowunderreviewbyIntervenors.Thesubjecttestimonyinvolvedprobabilisticanalysis.Inaddition,IntervenorspropoundtheattachedinterrogatoriestotheutilityinanefforttodevelopacompleterecordonFPL'shistoryofon-siteandoff-sitepoweravailabilitysoastoaid,theAppealBoardintheirdeliberationsontheseissues.Finally,INtervenorsareattemptingtoobtainthetestimonyofDaleBridenbaughofMBHAssociatesofSanJose,Californiasincehehasperformedananalysisofthesafetyimplicationsoftheproblemsassociatedwiththeon-sitepowerfailuresattheSt.LucieplantandMr.Baranowsky'sprobabilisticanalysistestimony.IfIntervenorsobtainMr.Bridenbaugh'sservicesitwillbetoolatetoprefilehistestimony.Therefore,inlieuofthattestimony,andfortheinformationoftheBoardandtheparties,theIntervenorsfileherewithanin-depthnewspaperarticletreatingMr.Bridenbagh',sviewsfromthePalmBeachPostTimesofOctober28,1979..
Page2Farrar,Sazman,JohnsonNovember27,1979IthadbeenIntervenorsintentiontofilethisletterandaccompanyingInterrogatoriesbyMonday,Nov.19,1979butsomedelaywasoccasionedwhenIntervenorstypwriterbroke.orstruly,rtinH.HodderCounselforIntervenorsCCNormanA.CollHaroldF.ReisMilliamD.Paton N
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:31, 26 April 2018

Notifies That Intervenors Will Not Present Testimony of R Pollard of Ucs at 791211 Hearing.Forwards Newspaper Article Treating D Bridenbaugh Views Re Safety Implications of Power Failures,Since Prefiling Testimony Infeasible
ML17207A676
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/27/1979
From: HODDER M H
HODDER, M.H.
To: FARRAR M C, JOHNSON W R, SALZMAN R S
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML17207A677 List:
References
NUDOCS 7912270147
Download: ML17207A676 (4)


Text

1131N.E.86StreetMiami,Fla.33138November27,1979AtomicSafetyLicensingandAppealBoardMichaelC.Farrar,Esq.,ChairmanRichardS.Salzman,Esq.Dr.W.ReedJohnsonIntheMatterofFloridaPowerandLightCompany(St.LucieNuclearPowerPlant,Unit2)DocketNo.50-389

DearMembersoftheBoard,

IntervenorswishtoadvisethepartiesandmembersoftheBoardthatforgoodandsufficientreasontheypresentlywillnotbeabletopresentthedirecttestimonyofRobertPollardoftheUnionofConcernedScientistsatthehearingscheduledforDec.11,1979.Intervenorswillparticipateandwillpresenttheircasethroughcrossexaminationandinterrogatories.IntervenorshadadvisedcounselfortheStaffandtheapplicantinformallybytelephonepriortotheNov.16,1979deadlineforfilingwrittentestimony,thatthiswouldbethelikelyoutcomeofanyeffortbytheIntervenorstopresentMr.Pollard'stestimonyinadirectcase.TheIntervenor+furtheradvisedthepartiescounselthattheirdecisionnottopresentdirecttestimonywassubjecttoreviewuponexaminationoftestimonyofPatrickW.BaranowskytobefiledbytheStaffonNov.9,1979andwhichwasreceivedbytheIntervenorsforthefirsttimeFriday,Nov.16,1979.ThattestimonyisnowunderreviewbyIntervenors.Thesubjecttestimonyinvolvedprobabilisticanalysis.Inaddition,IntervenorspropoundtheattachedinterrogatoriestotheutilityinanefforttodevelopacompleterecordonFPL'shistoryofon-siteandoff-sitepoweravailabilitysoastoaid,theAppealBoardintheirdeliberationsontheseissues.Finally,INtervenorsareattemptingtoobtainthetestimonyofDaleBridenbaughofMBHAssociatesofSanJose,Californiasincehehasperformedananalysisofthesafetyimplicationsoftheproblemsassociatedwiththeon-sitepowerfailuresattheSt.LucieplantandMr.Baranowsky'sprobabilisticanalysistestimony.IfIntervenorsobtainMr.Bridenbaugh'sservicesitwillbetoolatetoprefilehistestimony.Therefore,inlieuofthattestimony,andfortheinformationoftheBoardandtheparties,theIntervenorsfileherewithanin-depthnewspaperarticletreatingMr.Bridenbagh',sviewsfromthePalmBeachPostTimesofOctober28,1979..

Page2Farrar,Sazman,JohnsonNovember27,1979IthadbeenIntervenorsintentiontofilethisletterandaccompanyingInterrogatoriesbyMonday,Nov.19,1979butsomedelaywasoccasionedwhenIntervenorstypwriterbroke.orstruly,rtinH.HodderCounselforIntervenorsCCNormanA.CollHaroldF.ReisMilliamD.Paton N