ML15141A099: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML15141A099
| number = ML15141A099
| issue date = 05/20/2015
| issue date = 05/20/2015
| title = 2015/05/20 NRR E-mail Capture - Presentation Slides for Duke Public Meeting
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - Presentation Slides for Duke Public Meeting
| author name = Miller E
| author name = Miller E
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Miller, Ed Sent:Wednesday, May 20, 2015 8:16 AM To:Hardgrove, Matthew; Diamond, David J (dia mond@bnl.gov) (diamond@
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:
bnl.gov); Jenkins, Joel
Miller, Ed Sent:
Wednesday, May 20, 2015 8:16 AM To:
Hardgrove, Matthew; Diamond, David J (diamond@bnl.gov) (diamond@bnl.gov); Jenkins, Joel


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Presentation Slides for Duke Public Meeting Attachments:
Presentation Slides for Duke Public Meeting Attachments:
Duke Final slides for NRC RAPTOR presentation dated 5-19-15 rev 1.pptx; Catawba Unit 1 MUR RAI Whitepaper Slides_prop3_NRC.pptxHere are the slides used at the meeting yesterday.  
Duke Final slides for NRC RAPTOR presentation dated 5-19-15 rev 1.pptx; Catawba Unit 1 MUR RAI Whitepaper Slides_prop3_NRC.pptx Here are the slides used at the meeting yesterday.
Ed


Ed Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2099   Mail Envelope Properties   (9C2386A0C0BC584684916F7A0482B6CA018F6CB564D4)
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_PMDA Email Number:
2099 Mail Envelope Properties (9C2386A0C0BC584684916F7A0482B6CA018F6CB564D4)  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Presentation Slides for Duke Public Meeting Sent Date:   5/20/2015 8:15:32 AM Received Date: 5/20/2015 8:15:00 AM From:   Miller, Ed Created By:   Ed.Miller@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Hardgrove, Matthew" <Matthew.Hardgrove@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Diamond, David J (diamond@bnl.gov) (diamond@bnl.gov)" <diamond@bnl.gov> Tracking Status: None "Jenkins, Joel" <Joel.Jenkins@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None  
Presentation Slides for Duke Public Meeting Sent Date:
5/20/2015 8:15:32 AM Received Date:
5/20/2015 8:15:00 AM From:
Miller, Ed Created By:
Ed.Miller@nrc.gov Recipients:  
"Hardgrove, Matthew" <Matthew.Hardgrove@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Diamond, David J (diamond@bnl.gov) (diamond@bnl.gov)" <diamond@bnl.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Jenkins, Joel" <Joel.Jenkins@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 65 5/20/2015 8:15:00 AM Duke Final slides for NRC RAPTOR presentation dated 5-19-15 rev 1.pptx 151263 Catawba Unit 1 MUR RAI Whitepaper Slides_prop3_NRC.pptx 572923 Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:


Post Office:  HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    65      5/20/2015 8:15:00 AM  Duke Final  slides for NRC  RAPTOR presentation  dated 5-19-15 rev 1.pptx    151263 Catawba Unit 1 MUR RAI Whitepaper Slides_prop3_NRC.pptx    572923 Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:
Justification for the use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate (MUR)
Justification for the use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate (MUR)FlEliFluence EvaluationsCecil Fletcher, Catawba Nuclear Station flffManager o f Regulatory Affairs May 19, 2015 y
Fl E
Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations Purpose of the meetin gpg*Duke requested this meeting to present its written response to RAI SRXB-RAI8.SRXBRAI 8.*The RAPTOR-M3G code used to calculate fluence for MUR conditionsdoesnotappeartobeapprovedbytheNRCforgenericconditions does not appear to be approved by the NRC for generic application.  
l i
*Thismeetingcoupledwithadditionaltechnicalinformation This meeting coupled with additional technical information submitted to the NRC provides the justification for the use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 MUR Power Uprate Fluence evaluations.
Fluence Evaluations Cecil Fletcher, Catawba Nuclear Station f
2 Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate FluenceEvaluations ProjectOverviewProject Overview*During the course of the project, design and operational margin evaluations have been completed on all Catawba Unit 1 and Shared Structure, Systems and Components (SSCs).
l ff Manager of Regulatory Affairs May 19, 2015 y
These evaluations demonstrate that Catawba Unit 1 and Shared SSCs have sufficient mar gin to accommodate the MUR gPower Uprate.
 
*Cameron Measurement Systems, CaldonUltrasonics LEFM CheckPlusFlow Measurement system was installed in Catawbaunit1inMay2014.Catawba unit 1 in May 2014.3 Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations  
Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations Purpose of the meeting p
*LAR Submittal  
g Duke requested this meeting to present its written response to RAI SRXB-RAI 8.
SRXB RAI 8.
The RAPTOR-M3G code used to calculate fluence for MUR conditions does not appear to be approved by the NRC for generic conditions does not appear to be approved by the NRC for generic application.
This meeting coupled with additional technical information This meeting coupled with additional technical information submitted to the NRC provides the justification for the use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 MUR Power Uprate Fluence evaluations.
2
 
Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations Project Overview Project Overview
* During the course of the project, design and operational margin evaluations have been completed on all Catawba Unit 1 and Shared Structure, Systems and Components (SSCs).
These evaluations demonstrate that Catawba Unit 1 and Shared SSCs have sufficient margin to accommodate the MUR g
Power Uprate.
* Cameron Measurement Systems, Caldon Ultrasonics LEFM CheckPlus Flow Measurement system was installed in Catawba unit 1 in May 2014.
Catawba unit 1 in May 2014.
3
 
Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations
* LAR Submittal  


==Background:==
==Background:==
Initial submittal made on June 23, 2014 consistent with Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2002-03 format.
Supplemented on August 26 2014 to confirm completion of commitment related Supplemented on August 26, 2014 to confirm completion of commitment related to evaluation of components for acceptability for post-MUR equipment qualification (EQ) conditions.
First request for additional information (RAI) response letter submitted on q
(
)
p December 15, 2014 (responded to questions from SRXB, SCVB, AFPB, EMCB, and ESGB branches and included WCAP-16083-NP and WCAP-17669-NP).
Second RAI response letter submitted on January 22, 2015 (responded to i
f EVIB d EEEB b h
)
questions from EVIB and EEEB branches).
Third RAI response letter submitted on April 23, 2015 (responded to questions from SRXB, ESGB, and EEEB branches and included WCAP-17993-NP).
4


*Initial submittal made on June 23, 2014 consistent with Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2002-03 format.
Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations
*SupplementedonAugust262014toconfirmcompletionofcommitmentrelated
* 2012 Decision to Use Raptor
*Supplemented on August 26, 2014 to confirm completion of commitment related to evaluation of components for acceptability for post-MUR equipment qualification (EQ) conditions.
- Both DORT/SYNTHESIS and RAPTOR-M3G had been performed Both DORT/SYNTHESIS and RAPTOR M3G had been performed.
*First request for additional information (RAI) response letter submitted on q()pDecember 15, 2014 (responded to questions from SRXB, SCVB, AFPB, EMCB, and ESGB branches and included WCAP-16083-NP and WCAP-17669-NP).
Comparison showed:
*Second RAI response letter submitted on January 22, 2015 (responded to ifEVIBdEEEBbh)questions from EVIB and EEEB branches).*Third RAI response letter submitted on April 23, 2015 (responded to questions from SRXB, ESGB, and EEEB branches and included WCAP-17993-NP).
* The two methods calculated fluence values for the original beltline region that were in good agreement.
4 Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations  
* Being better able to track and account for high energy neutrons, RAPTOR fluence values in the extended beltline region were more realistic.
*2012 Decision to Use Raptor
- RAPTOR was validated within Westinghouse using by past surveillance l d i
-BothDORT/SYNTHESISandRAPTOR
t d t R
-M3Ghadbeenperformed Both DORT/SYNTHESIS and RAPTORM3G had been performed
G id 1 190 capsule dosimetry data per Reg. Guide 1.190.
. Comparison showed:
- RAPTOR was previously used for South Texas Capsule fluence. NRC stated:
*The two methods calculated fluence values for the original beltline region that were in good agreement.
h ld f l
*Being better able to track and account for high energy neutrons, RAPTOR fluence values in the extended beltline region were more realistic.
l fl h d h
-RAPTOR was validated within Westinghouse using by past surveillance lditdtRGid1190capsule dosimetry data per Reg. Guide 1.190.-RAPTOR was previously used for South Texas Capsule fluence. NRC stated:"hldfllflhdhhb
h b
*"Should future eva luations emp loy fluence met hods that have not been NRC reviewed and approved, adequate justification regarding the application and qualification of those methods should be provided. RG 1.190 provides guidance for acceptable fluence methods."
* Should future evaluations employ fluence methods that have not been NRC reviewed and approved, adequate justification regarding the application and qualification of those methods should be provided. RG 1.190 provides guidance for acceptable fluence methods.
5 Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations  
5
*Catawba Reactor Vessel Material
 
-During recent license amendment submittals the NRC Staff has requested llRVfititilbilddhddiftth all RV ferritic material be included when addressing fracture toughness requirement for RV integrity. RIS 2014-11 defines these requirements.
Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations Catawba Reactor Vessel Material
-As a result of considering all ferritic material for the MUR submittal, the lead material for P-T limits is located in the Catawba Unit 1 extended beltline region.Factors that contributed to the shift in location are:
- During recent license amendment submittals the NRC Staff has requested ll RV f iti t
*The original beltline materials have good toughness properties based on actual material data.*Not all material properties are available for the extended beltline material resultin g in ppguncertainty which requires additional margin.
i l b i l d d h
-The current Catawba Unit 1 P-T limits are for 34 EFPY. Using RAPTOR to calculate fluence including the extended beltline for MUR, the current P-T limitswouldbegoodfor307EFPY(Currently251EFPY) limits would be good for 30.7 EFPY. (Currently 25.1 EFPY)-With inclusion of margin associated with extended beltline material/nozzles and possibly BTP 5-3, the improved accuracy obtained by using RAPTOR is important in maintaining adequate but reasonable lloperationa l limits.6 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.Jianwei ChenCatawba Unit 1 MUR SRXB-RAI 8 ResponsePrincipal Engineer, Ph. D Greg A. FischerPrincipalEngineerPE Principal Engineer, P.E.May 19, 2015 1
dd i
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
f t
t h
all RV ferritic material be included when addressing fracture toughness requirement for RV integrity. RIS 2014-11 defines these requirements.
- As a result of considering all ferritic material for the MUR submittal, the lead material for P-T limits is located in the Catawba Unit 1 extended beltline region. Factors that contributed to the shift in location are:
The original beltline materials have good toughness properties based on actual material data.
Not all material properties are available for the extended beltline material resulting in p
p g
uncertainty which requires additional margin.
- The current Catawba Unit 1 P-T limits are for 34 EFPY. Using RAPTOR to calculate fluence including the extended beltline for MUR, the current P-T limits would be good for 30 7 EFPY (Currently 25 1 EFPY) limits would be good for 30.7 EFPY. (Currently 25.1 EFPY)
- With inclusion of margin associated with extended beltline material/nozzles and possibly BTP 5-3, the improved accuracy obtained by using RAPTOR is important in maintaining adequate but reasonable l l operational limits.
6
 
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Jianwei Chen Catawba Unit 1 MUR SRXB-RAI 8 Response Principal Engineer, Ph. D Greg A. Fischer Principal Engineer P E Principal Engineer, P.E.
May 19, 2015 1
 
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.


===Background===
===Background===
Background
Background
*The neutron fluenceexposure at reactor pressure vessel (RPV)isanimportantinputtothereactorvesselintegrity (RPV) is an important input to the reactor vessel integrity (RVI) assessment, which is a critical evaluation for power uprate and plant life extension
* The neutron fluence exposure at reactor pressure vessel (RPV) is an important input to the reactor vessel integrity (RPV) is an important input to the reactor vessel integrity (RVI) assessment, which is a critical evaluation for power uprate and plant life extension
*Traditionally, the neutron fluencehas been evaluated using discrete ordinates radiation transport codes:
* Traditionally, the neutron fluence has been evaluated using discrete ordinates radiation transport codes:
-TWOTRAN(1968)
- TWOTRAN (1968) - Can only solve 1-D and 2-D problems TWOTRAN (1968)
-Canonlysolve1
Can only solve 1 D and 2 D problems
-Dand2-Dproblems TWOTRAN (1968) Can only solve 1D and 2D problems-DOT (1970) -Can only solve 1-D and 2-D problems
- DOT (1970) - Can only solve 1-D and 2-D problems
-DORT (1980's) -Can only solve 1-D and 2-D problems
- DORT (1980s) - Can only solve 1-D and 2-D problems
-TORT-Cansolve3
- TORT - Can solve 3-D problems but not for full-size
-Dproblemsbutnotforfull
- TORT - Can solve 3-D problems, but not for full-size commercial reactor vessels per Regulatory Guide 1.190 pedigree due to computer resource limitations 2
-size-TORT -Can solve 3-D problems, but not for full-size commercial reactor vessels per Regulatory Guide 1.190 pedigree due to computer resource limitations 2
 
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.


===Background===
===Background===
Background
Background
*RAPTOR-M3G was developed to overcome TORT's limitations limitations FeatureTORTRAPTOR-M3GSolves the linear Boltzmann radiation transport equation in 3DApplies the method of discrete ordinates (theS Nmethod) to treat directional variablesApplies weighted finite-difference methodsto treat spatial variablesAliltifltitttddApplies a multigroupformulation to treat energy dependenceDOORS Package(DORT/TORT) input formatExecute on a one-workstation platformExecutessimultaneously inparallelonanetworkofworkstationsExecutes simultaneously in-parallel on a network of workstationsExecute with theta-weighted(TW) spatial differencing schemeExecute with directional theta-weighted(DTW) spatial differencing scheme3 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
* RAPTOR-M3G was developed to overcome TORTs limitations limitations Feature TORT RAPTOR-M3G Solves the linear Boltzmann radiation transport equation in 3D
 
Applies the method of discrete ordinates (the SN method) to treat directional variables
 
Applies weighted finite-difference methods to treat spatial variables
 
A li lti f
l ti t
t t
d d
 
Applies a multigroup formulation to treat energy dependence
 
DOORS Package (DORT/TORT) input format
 
Execute on a one-workstation platform
 
Executes simultaneously in parallel on a network of workstations
 
Executes simultaneously in-parallel on a network of workstations
 
Execute with theta-weighted (TW) spatial differencing scheme
 
Execute with directional theta-weighted (DTW) spatial differencing scheme
 
3
 
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.


===Background===
===Background===
Background
Background
*Westinghouse has performed the neutron fluenceevaluationinsupportoftheCatawbaUnit1MURusing evaluation in support of the Catawba Unit 1 MUR using RAPTOR-M3G in WCAP-17669-NP, Revision 0  
* Westinghouse has performed the neutron fluence evaluation in support of the Catawba Unit 1 MUR using evaluation in support of the Catawba Unit 1 MUR using RAPTOR-M3G in WCAP-17669-NP, Revision 0
*NRC issued SRXB-RAI 8:
* NRC issued SRXB-RAI 8:
-The RAPTOR-M3G code used to calculate fluencefor MUR conditions does not appear to be approved by the NRC for use in this scenario. The NRC staff re quests that the licensee qprovide justification for the use of RAPTOR-M3G for fluence calculations for MUR conditions, or provide an alternative fluencecalculationusinganNRCapprovedmethod.
- The RAPTOR-M3G code used to calculate fluence for MUR conditions does not appear to be approved by the NRC for use in this scenario. The NRC staff requests that the licensee q
fluencecalculation using an NRC approved method.4 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.WestinghouseRAIResponse Westinghouse RAI Response*Westinghouse/Duke are providing justification to the NRC thattheuseofRAPTORM3Gforfluencecalculationsfor that the use of RAPTOR-M3G for fluencecalculations for MUR conditions is acceptable.
provide justification for the use of RAPTOR-M3G for fluence calculations for MUR conditions, or provide an alternative fluence calculation using an NRC approved method.
*Additional Catawba Unit 1 s pecific benchmark calculations phave been done between TORT and RAPTOR-M3G
fluence calculation using an NRC approved method.
-For limiting RPV materials
4
-Forrepresentativefuelcycles For representative fuel cycles*Due to computer limitations with TORT, three reduced size models were used:URtEit(URE)dl(Wld06)
 
-Upper Reactor Environment (URE) model (Weld 06)-MidplaneReactor Environment (MRE) model (Weld 05)
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
-Lower Reactor Environment (LRE) model (Weld 04) 5 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.WestinghouseRAIResponseStrategy Westinghouse RAI Response StrategyReduced Size Model + TW + TORTDemonstrate TORT and RAPTOR-M3G provide identical results Demonstrate Reduced Size Model has no impact Reduced Size Model + TW + RAPTOR-M3GDemonstrate DTW is conservative for Weld W06Full Core Fine Mesh + TW + RAPTOR-M3G 4 sets of results for detailed Full Core Fine Mesh + DTW + RAPTOR-M3G (NRC submittal) 6comparison of TORT and RAPTOR-M3G runs Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Results7 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.WestinghouseRAIResponseCalculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations
Westinghouse RAI Response Westinghouse RAI Response
*RPV Materials Evaluated in Benchmark CalculationsUpperShelltoIntermediateShellCircumferentialWeldW06
* Westinghouse/Duke are providing justification to the NRC that the use of RAPTOR M3G for fluence calculations for that the use of RAPTOR-M3G for fluence calculations for MUR conditions is acceptable.
-Upper Shell to Intermediate Shell Circumferential Weld W06 -Intermediate Shell to Lower Shell Circumferential Weld W05
* Additional Catawba Unit 1 specific benchmark calculations p
-Lower Shell to Bottom Head Ring Circumferential Weld W04
have been done between TORT and RAPTOR-M3G
*Power Distributions used in Benchmark Calculations
- For limiting RPV materials
-Cycle 3, representative of Out-In (High Leakage) core design strategies
- For representative fuel cycles For representative fuel cycles
-Cycle 21, representative of Low-Leakage core design strategies
* Due to computer limitations with TORT, three reduced size models were used:
-A time-wei ghted avera ge of power distributions throu gh 54 ggpgEFPY, to provide fluenceprojection at 54 EFPY based on one  
U R
t E
i t (URE) d l (W ld 06)
- Upper Reactor Environment (URE) model (Weld 06)
- Midplane Reactor Environment (MRE) model (Weld 05)
- Lower Reactor Environment (LRE) model (Weld 04) 5
 
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Westinghouse RAI Response Strategy Westinghouse RAI Response Strategy Reduced Size Model + TW + TORT Demonstrate TORT and RAPTOR-M3G provide identical results Demonstrate Reduced Size Model has no impact Reduced Size Model + TW + RAPTOR-M3G Demonstrate DTW is conservative for Weld W06 Full Core Fine Mesh + TW + RAPTOR-M3G 4 sets of results for detailed Full Core Fine Mesh + DTW + RAPTOR-M3G (NRC submittal) 6 comparison of TORT and RAPTOR-M3G runs
 
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Results 7
 
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations
* RPV Materials Evaluated in Benchmark Calculations Upper Shell to Intermediate Shell Circumferential Weld W06
- Upper Shell to Intermediate Shell Circumferential Weld W06  
- Intermediate Shell to Lower Shell Circumferential Weld W05
- Lower Shell to Bottom Head Ring Circumferential Weld W04
* Power Distributions used in Benchmark Calculations
- Cycle 3, representative of Out-In (High Leakage) core design strategies
- Cycle 21, representative of Low-Leakage core design strategies
- A time-weighted average of power distributions through 54 g
g p
g EFPY, to provide fluence projection at 54 EFPY based on one cycle calculation 8
 
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations
* URE model - 209 radial, 195 azimuthal, and 89 axial mesh intervals intervals TORT and RAPTOR-M3G runs are 9
using the same geometry model, materials, and source distributions
 
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations
* MRE model - 209 radial, 195 azimuthal, and 85 axial mesh intervals intervals TORT and RAPTOR-M3G runs are 10 using the same geometry model, materials, and source distributions
 
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations
* LRE model - 209 radial, 195 azimuthal, and 91 axial mesh intervals intervals Combining all three reduced size models would be a full core model similar to 11 would be a full core model similar to geometry model used in WCAP-17669-NP, but still not as refined.
 
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations
* Boundary Conditions and Extent of Applicability for the Reduced Size Models Reduced Size Models Parameter Reduced-Size Model URE MRE LRE Bottom of Model*
0.0 cm
-191.206 cm
-363.296 cm Bottom Boundary Condition Reflective Void Void Top of Model*
343 46 cm 190 289 cm 0 0 cm Top of Model 343.46 cm 190.289 cm 0.0 cm Top Boundary Condition Void Void Reflective Bottom Extent of Model Applicability*
75.0 cm
-75.0 cm
-330.0 cm
* Dimensions are given relative to the active core midplane Top Extent of Model Applicability*
300.0 cm 75.0 cm
-75.0 cm Materials Analyzed in Model Weld W06 Weld W05 Weld W04 URE Weld 06 12 Dimensions are given relative to the active core midplane URE - Weld 06 MRE - Weld 05 LRE - Weld 04
 
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results
* Calculated Neutron Fluence Rates for Catawba Unit 1 Cycle 3 Cycle 3 Model Calculated Neutron (E>1.0 MeV)
Fluence Rate (Flux) [n/cm2-s]
(
)
Weld W06 Weld W05 Weld W04 Reduced-Size Models (TORT) with TW 1.06E+09 2.36E+10 1.91E+09 Reduced-Size Models (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW 1 06E+09 2 36E+10 1 90E+09 Reduced-Size Models (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW 1.06E+09 2.36E+10 1.90E+09 RAPTOR-M3G Model in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 with TW 1.06E+09 2.36E+10 1.90E+09 RAPTOR-M3G Model in WCAP-17669-NP Rev 0 1 14E+09 2 33E+10 1 98E+09 RAPTOR M3G Model in WCAP 17669 NP, Rev. 0 1.14E+09 2.33E+10 1.98E+09 TORT and RAPTOR-M3G with TW methods give identical results (<1%)
13 identical results (<1%).
RAPTOR-M3G with DTW method yields more conservative results for limiting weld W06


cycle calculation 8
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.WestinghouseRAIResponseCalculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
*URE model -209 radial, 195 azimuthal, and 89 axial mesh intervals intervals TORT and RAPTOR-M3G runs are 9using the same geometry model, materials, and source distributions Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.WestinghouseRAIResponseCalculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations
Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results
*MRE model -209 radial, 195 azimuthal, and 85 axial mesh intervals intervals TORT and RAPTOR-M3G runs are 10using the same geometry model, materials, and source distributions Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.WestinghouseRAIResponseCalculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations
* Calculated Neutron Fluence Rates for Catawba Unit 1 Cycle 21 Cycle 21 Model Calculated Neutron (E>1.0 MeV)
*LRE model -209 radial, 195 azimuthal, and 91 axial mesh intervals intervalsCombining all three reduced size models wouldbeafullcoremodelsimilarto 11would be a full core model similar to geometry model used in WCAP-17669-NP, but still not as refined.
Fluence Rate (Flux) [n/cm2-s]
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.WestinghouseRAIResponseCalculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations
(
*Boundary Conditions and Extent of Applicability for the ReducedSizeModels Reduced Size ModelsParameterReduced-Size ModelUREMRELREBottom of Model
)
*0.0 cm-191.206 cm-363.296 cmBottom Boundary ConditionReflectiveVoidVoidTopofModel
Weld W06 Weld W05 Weld W04 Reduced-Size Models (TORT) with TW 6.41E+08 1.54E+10 1.20E+09 Reduced-Size Models (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW 6 40E+08 1 54E+10 1 20E+09 Reduced-Size Models (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW 6.40E+08 1.54E+10 1.20E+09 RAPTOR-M3G Model in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 with TW 6.40E+08 1.54E+10 1.20E+09 RAPTOR-M3G Model in WCAP-17669-NP Rev 0 6 98E+08 1 54E+10 1 26E+09 RAPTOR M3G Model in WCAP 17669 NP, Rev. 0 6.98E+08 1.54E+10 1.26E+09 TORT and RAPTOR-M3G with TW methods give identical results (<1%)
*34346cm190289cm00cmTop of Model343.46 cm190.289 cm0.0 cmTop Boundary ConditionVoidVoidReflective Bottom Extent of Model Applicability
14 identical results (<1%).
*75.0 cm-75.0cm-330.0 cm
RAPTOR-M3G with DTW method yields more conservative results for limiting weld W06
*Dimensionsaregivenrelativetotheactivecore midplaneTop Extent of Model Applicability
*300.0 cm75.0 cm-75.0 cmMaterials Analyzed in ModelWeld W06Weld W05Weld W04 UREWeld0612 Dimensions are given relative to the active core midplaneURE -Weld 06MRE -Weld 05LRE -Weld 04 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.WestinghouseRAIResponseCalculationResults Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results*Calculated Neutron FluenceRates for Catawba Unit 1 Cycle3Cycle 3ModelCalculated Neutron (E>1.0 MeV)FluenceRate (Flux) [n/cm2-s]()Weld W06Weld W05Weld W04Reduced-Size Models (TORT) with TW1.06E+092.36E+101.91E+09 Reduced-SizeModels(RAPTOR
-M3G)withTW106E+09236E+10190E+09Reduced-SizeModels (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW1.06E+092.36E+101.90E+09RAPTOR-M3GModel in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 with TW1.06E+092.36E+101.90E+09RAPTOR-M3GModelin WCAP-17669-NPRev0114E+09233E+10198E+09RAPTORM3G Model inWCAP17669NP, Rev. 01.14E+092.33E+101.98E+09TORT and RAPTOR-M3G with TW methods give identicalresults(<1%)
13identical results (<1%).RAPTOR-M3G with DTW method yields more conservative results for limiting weld W06 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.WestinghouseRAIResponseCalculationResults Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results*Calculated Neutron FluenceRates for Catawba Unit 1 Cycle21Cycle 21ModelCalculated Neutron (E>1.0 MeV)FluenceRate (Flux) [n/cm2-s]()Weld W06Weld W05Weld W04Reduced-Size Models (TORT) with TW6.41E+081.54E+101.20E+09 Reduced-SizeModels(RAPTOR
-M3G)withTW640E+08154E+10120E+09Reduced-SizeModels (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW6.40E+081.54E+101.20E+09RAPTOR-M3GModel in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 with TW6.40E+081.54E+101.20E+09RAPTOR-M3GModelin WCAP-17669-NPRev0698E+08154E+10126E+09RAPTORM3G Model inWCAP17669NP, Rev. 06.98E+081.54E+101.26E+09TORT and RAPTOR-M3G with TW methods give identicalresults(<1%)
14identical results (<1%).RAPTOR-M3G with DTW method yields more conservative results for limiting weld W06 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.WestinghouseRAIResponseCalculationResults Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results*Calculated Neutron Fluenceafter 54 EFPY at Catawba Unit 1(Reduced
-SizeModelscalculatedusingtime
-weighted1 (ReducedSize Models calculated using timeweighted average power distributions)ModelCalculated Neutron (E>1.0 MeV)
Fluence[n/cm2]Fluence[n/cm2]Weld W06Weld W05Weld W04Reduced-Size Models (TORT) with TW1.05E+182.66E+191.83E+18Reduced-SizeModels (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW1.05E+182.66E+191.83E+18RAPTOR-M3GModel in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 with TW1.05E+18 (1.07E+18)
*2.66E+19


(2.63E+19)
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
*1.83E+18  
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results
* Calculated Neutron Fluence after 54 EFPY at Catawba Unit 1 (Reduced-Size Models calculated using time-weighted 1 (Reduced Size Models calculated using time weighted average power distributions)
Model Calculated Neutron (E>1.0 MeV)
Fluence [n/cm2]
Fluence [n/cm2]
Weld W06 Weld W05 Weld W04 Reduced-Size Models (TORT) with TW 1.05E+18 2.66E+19 1.83E+18 Reduced-Size Models (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW 1.05E+18 2.66E+19 1.83E+18 RAPTOR-M3G Model in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 with TW 1.05E+18 (1.07E+18)*
2.66E+19 (2.63E+19)*
1.83E+18 (1.86E+18)*
*The projected 54 EFPY fluence value in the parenthesis is calculated by accumulating cycle-specific fluence for cycles 1 through 22, and assuming Cycle 22 at MUR power for cycles beyond Cycle 22, the same approach used in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 RAPTOR-M3G Model in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 1.16E+18 2.60E+19 1.95E+18 15 TORT and RAPTOR-M3G with TW methods give identical results (<1%).
RAPTOR-M3G with DTW method yields more conservative results for limiting weld W06


(1.86E+18)
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
**The projected 54 EFPY fluencevalue in the parent hesis is calculated by accumulating cycle-specific fluencefor cycles 1 through 22, and assuming Cycle 22 at MUR power for cycles beyond Cycle 22, the same approach used in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0RAPTOR-M3G Model inWCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 01.16E+182.60E+191.95E+18 15TORT and RAPTOR-M3G with TW methods give identical results (<1%).
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
RAPTOR-M3G with DTW method yields more conservative results for limiting weld W06 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Conclusions Conclusions
Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Conclusions Conclusions
*TORT and RAPTOR-M3G produce nearly identical results, iewithin1%whenusingthesamegeometricalmodel i.e., within 1%, when using the same geometrical model and calculation control parameters
* TORT and RAPTOR-M3G produce nearly identical results, i e within 1% when using the same geometrical model i.e., within 1%, when using the same geometrical model and calculation control parameters
*The results from RAPTOR-M3G and TORT agree better thanthe13%uncertaintyassignedtothe calculational than the 13% uncertainty assigned to the calculationalmethodology and well within the 20% uncertainty deemed acceptable for RT PTSand RTNDTdetermination ffCf*The fast neutron fluencereported to NR C for the limiting fluenceat 54 EFPY (upper shell to intermediate shell circumferential weld W06) in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 is the bounding value
* The results from RAPTOR-M3G and TORT agree better than the 13% uncertainty assigned to the calculational than the 13% uncertainty assigned to the calculational methodology and well within the 20% uncertainty deemed acceptable for RTPTS and RTNDT determination f
*Therefore, the fast neutron flux / fluencevalues submitted  
f C f
* The fast neutron fluence reported to NRC for the limiting fluence at 54 EFPY (upper shell to intermediate shell circumferential weld W06) in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 is the bounding value
* Therefore, the fast neutron flux / fluence values submitted to NRC in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 are acceptable 16 p


to NRC in WCAP-17669-NP
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
, Rev. 0 are acce ptable16,p Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Conclusions Conclusions
Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Conclusions Conclusions
*The in-vessel surveillance capsule and ex-vessel neutron dosimetrydatahavebeenprovidedinWCAP
* The in-vessel surveillance capsule and ex-vessel neutron dosimetry data have been provided in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0, dosimetry data have been provided in WCAP 17669 NP, Rev. 0, Appendix C, the measurement-to-calculation (RAPTOR-M3G) comparisons show:
-17669-NP,Rev.0, dosimetry data have been provided in WCAP17669NP, Rev. 0, Appendix C, the measurement-to-calculation (RAPTOR-M3G) comparisons show:
- The in-vessel dosimeters meet the +/-20% criteria for in-vessel ill l
-The in-vessel dosimeters meet the +/-20% criteria for in-vessel illlRlGid1190 surveillance capsu les per Regulatory Guide 1.190-The ex-vessel dosimeters meet the +/-30% criteria for the cavity capsules per Regulatory Guide 1.190.
R l
*Furthersensitivitystudyhasshown:
G id 1 190 surveillance capsules per Regulatory Guide 1.190
*Further sensitivity study has shown:-Both the RAPTOR-M3G model used in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 and the reduced size models have achieved geometrical  
- The ex-vessel dosimeters meet the +/- 30% criteria for the cavity capsules per Regulatory Guide 1.190.
* Further sensitivity study has shown:
* Further sensitivity study has shown:
- Both the RAPTOR-M3G model used in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 and the reduced size models have achieved geometrical convergence, i.e., using much coarser mesh only changes the g
g y
g fluence results less than 2%.
- Using different quadrature sets (e.g., S12 vs. S8) only renders less than 3% difference in the calculated fluence values.
17


convergence, i.e., using much coarser mesh onl y changes the g,,gygfluenceresults less than 2%.
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3
-Using different quadrature sets (e.g., S 12vs. S8) only renders less than 3% difference in the calculated fluencevalues.
&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.
17 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3&#xa9; 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.Thankyou!
Thank you !
Thank you !&Questions?
Thank you !
Questions?
18}}
18}}

Latest revision as of 11:30, 10 January 2025

NRR E-mail Capture - Presentation Slides for Duke Public Meeting
ML15141A099
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/20/2015
From: Ed Miller
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Matthew Hardgrove
NRC/NRR/DSS
References
Download: ML15141A099 (26)


Text

1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:

Miller, Ed Sent:

Wednesday, May 20, 2015 8:16 AM To:

Hardgrove, Matthew; Diamond, David J (diamond@bnl.gov) (diamond@bnl.gov); Jenkins, Joel

Subject:

Presentation Slides for Duke Public Meeting Attachments:

Duke Final slides for NRC RAPTOR presentation dated 5-19-15 rev 1.pptx; Catawba Unit 1 MUR RAI Whitepaper Slides_prop3_NRC.pptx Here are the slides used at the meeting yesterday.

Ed

Hearing Identifier:

NRR_PMDA Email Number:

2099 Mail Envelope Properties (9C2386A0C0BC584684916F7A0482B6CA018F6CB564D4)

Subject:

Presentation Slides for Duke Public Meeting Sent Date:

5/20/2015 8:15:32 AM Received Date:

5/20/2015 8:15:00 AM From:

Miller, Ed Created By:

Ed.Miller@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Hardgrove, Matthew" <Matthew.Hardgrove@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Diamond, David J (diamond@bnl.gov) (diamond@bnl.gov)" <diamond@bnl.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Jenkins, Joel" <Joel.Jenkins@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 65 5/20/2015 8:15:00 AM Duke Final slides for NRC RAPTOR presentation dated 5-19-15 rev 1.pptx 151263 Catawba Unit 1 MUR RAI Whitepaper Slides_prop3_NRC.pptx 572923 Options Priority:

Standard Return Notification:

No Reply Requested:

No Sensitivity:

Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Justification for the use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate (MUR)

Fl E

l i

Fluence Evaluations Cecil Fletcher, Catawba Nuclear Station f

l ff Manager of Regulatory Affairs May 19, 2015 y

Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations Purpose of the meeting p

g Duke requested this meeting to present its written response to RAI SRXB-RAI 8.

SRXB RAI 8.

The RAPTOR-M3G code used to calculate fluence for MUR conditions does not appear to be approved by the NRC for generic conditions does not appear to be approved by the NRC for generic application.

This meeting coupled with additional technical information This meeting coupled with additional technical information submitted to the NRC provides the justification for the use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 MUR Power Uprate Fluence evaluations.

2

Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations Project Overview Project Overview

  • During the course of the project, design and operational margin evaluations have been completed on all Catawba Unit 1 and Shared Structure, Systems and Components (SSCs).

These evaluations demonstrate that Catawba Unit 1 and Shared SSCs have sufficient margin to accommodate the MUR g

Power Uprate.

  • Cameron Measurement Systems, Caldon Ultrasonics LEFM CheckPlus Flow Measurement system was installed in Catawba unit 1 in May 2014.

Catawba unit 1 in May 2014.

3

Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations

Background:

Initial submittal made on June 23, 2014 consistent with Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2002-03 format.

Supplemented on August 26 2014 to confirm completion of commitment related Supplemented on August 26, 2014 to confirm completion of commitment related to evaluation of components for acceptability for post-MUR equipment qualification (EQ) conditions.

First request for additional information (RAI) response letter submitted on q

(

)

p December 15, 2014 (responded to questions from SRXB, SCVB, AFPB, EMCB, and ESGB branches and included WCAP-16083-NP and WCAP-17669-NP).

Second RAI response letter submitted on January 22, 2015 (responded to i

f EVIB d EEEB b h

)

questions from EVIB and EEEB branches).

Third RAI response letter submitted on April 23, 2015 (responded to questions from SRXB, ESGB, and EEEB branches and included WCAP-17993-NP).

4

Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations

  • 2012 Decision to Use Raptor

- Both DORT/SYNTHESIS and RAPTOR-M3G had been performed Both DORT/SYNTHESIS and RAPTOR M3G had been performed.

Comparison showed:

  • The two methods calculated fluence values for the original beltline region that were in good agreement.
  • Being better able to track and account for high energy neutrons, RAPTOR fluence values in the extended beltline region were more realistic.

- RAPTOR was validated within Westinghouse using by past surveillance l d i

t d t R

G id 1 190 capsule dosimetry data per Reg. Guide 1.190.

- RAPTOR was previously used for South Texas Capsule fluence. NRC stated:

h ld f l

l fl h d h

h b

  • Should future evaluations employ fluence methods that have not been NRC reviewed and approved, adequate justification regarding the application and qualification of those methods should be provided. RG 1.190 provides guidance for acceptable fluence methods.

5

Justification for the Use of RAPTOR-M3G for the Catawba Unit 1 Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate Fluence Evaluations Catawba Reactor Vessel Material

- During recent license amendment submittals the NRC Staff has requested ll RV f iti t

i l b i l d d h

dd i

f t

t h

all RV ferritic material be included when addressing fracture toughness requirement for RV integrity. RIS 2014-11 defines these requirements.

- As a result of considering all ferritic material for the MUR submittal, the lead material for P-T limits is located in the Catawba Unit 1 extended beltline region. Factors that contributed to the shift in location are:

The original beltline materials have good toughness properties based on actual material data.

Not all material properties are available for the extended beltline material resulting in p

p g

uncertainty which requires additional margin.

- The current Catawba Unit 1 P-T limits are for 34 EFPY. Using RAPTOR to calculate fluence including the extended beltline for MUR, the current P-T limits would be good for 30 7 EFPY (Currently 25 1 EFPY) limits would be good for 30.7 EFPY. (Currently 25.1 EFPY)

- With inclusion of margin associated with extended beltline material/nozzles and possibly BTP 5-3, the improved accuracy obtained by using RAPTOR is important in maintaining adequate but reasonable l l operational limits.

6

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Jianwei Chen Catawba Unit 1 MUR SRXB-RAI 8 Response Principal Engineer, Ph. D Greg A. Fischer Principal Engineer P E Principal Engineer, P.E.

May 19, 2015 1

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Background

Background

  • The neutron fluence exposure at reactor pressure vessel (RPV) is an important input to the reactor vessel integrity (RPV) is an important input to the reactor vessel integrity (RVI) assessment, which is a critical evaluation for power uprate and plant life extension
  • Traditionally, the neutron fluence has been evaluated using discrete ordinates radiation transport codes:

- TWOTRAN (1968) - Can only solve 1-D and 2-D problems TWOTRAN (1968)

Can only solve 1 D and 2 D problems

- DOT (1970) - Can only solve 1-D and 2-D problems

- DORT (1980s) - Can only solve 1-D and 2-D problems

- TORT - Can solve 3-D problems but not for full-size

- TORT - Can solve 3-D problems, but not for full-size commercial reactor vessels per Regulatory Guide 1.190 pedigree due to computer resource limitations 2

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Background

Background

  • RAPTOR-M3G was developed to overcome TORTs limitations limitations Feature TORT RAPTOR-M3G Solves the linear Boltzmann radiation transport equation in 3D

Applies the method of discrete ordinates (the SN method) to treat directional variables

Applies weighted finite-difference methods to treat spatial variables

A li lti f

l ti t

t t

d d

Applies a multigroup formulation to treat energy dependence

DOORS Package (DORT/TORT) input format

Execute on a one-workstation platform

Executes simultaneously in parallel on a network of workstations

Executes simultaneously in-parallel on a network of workstations

Execute with theta-weighted (TW) spatial differencing scheme

Execute with directional theta-weighted (DTW) spatial differencing scheme

3

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Background

Background

  • Westinghouse has performed the neutron fluence evaluation in support of the Catawba Unit 1 MUR using evaluation in support of the Catawba Unit 1 MUR using RAPTOR-M3G in WCAP-17669-NP, Revision 0
  • NRC issued SRXB-RAI 8:

- The RAPTOR-M3G code used to calculate fluence for MUR conditions does not appear to be approved by the NRC for use in this scenario. The NRC staff requests that the licensee q

provide justification for the use of RAPTOR-M3G for fluence calculations for MUR conditions, or provide an alternative fluence calculation using an NRC approved method.

fluence calculation using an NRC approved method.

4

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Westinghouse RAI Response Westinghouse RAI Response

  • Westinghouse/Duke are providing justification to the NRC that the use of RAPTOR M3G for fluence calculations for that the use of RAPTOR-M3G for fluence calculations for MUR conditions is acceptable.
  • Additional Catawba Unit 1 specific benchmark calculations p

have been done between TORT and RAPTOR-M3G

- For limiting RPV materials

- For representative fuel cycles For representative fuel cycles

  • Due to computer limitations with TORT, three reduced size models were used:

U R

t E

i t (URE) d l (W ld 06)

- Upper Reactor Environment (URE) model (Weld 06)

- Midplane Reactor Environment (MRE) model (Weld 05)

- Lower Reactor Environment (LRE) model (Weld 04) 5

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Westinghouse RAI Response Strategy Westinghouse RAI Response Strategy Reduced Size Model + TW + TORT Demonstrate TORT and RAPTOR-M3G provide identical results Demonstrate Reduced Size Model has no impact Reduced Size Model + TW + RAPTOR-M3G Demonstrate DTW is conservative for Weld W06 Full Core Fine Mesh + TW + RAPTOR-M3G 4 sets of results for detailed Full Core Fine Mesh + DTW + RAPTOR-M3G (NRC submittal) 6 comparison of TORT and RAPTOR-M3G runs

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Results 7

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations

  • RPV Materials Evaluated in Benchmark Calculations Upper Shell to Intermediate Shell Circumferential Weld W06

- Upper Shell to Intermediate Shell Circumferential Weld W06

- Intermediate Shell to Lower Shell Circumferential Weld W05

- Lower Shell to Bottom Head Ring Circumferential Weld W04

  • Power Distributions used in Benchmark Calculations

- Cycle 3, representative of Out-In (High Leakage) core design strategies

- Cycle 21, representative of Low-Leakage core design strategies

- A time-weighted average of power distributions through 54 g

g p

g EFPY, to provide fluence projection at 54 EFPY based on one cycle calculation 8

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations

  • URE model - 209 radial, 195 azimuthal, and 89 axial mesh intervals intervals TORT and RAPTOR-M3G runs are 9

using the same geometry model, materials, and source distributions

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations

  • MRE model - 209 radial, 195 azimuthal, and 85 axial mesh intervals intervals TORT and RAPTOR-M3G runs are 10 using the same geometry model, materials, and source distributions

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations

  • LRE model - 209 radial, 195 azimuthal, and 91 axial mesh intervals intervals Combining all three reduced size models would be a full core model similar to 11 would be a full core model similar to geometry model used in WCAP-17669-NP, but still not as refined.

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations Westinghouse RAI Response Calculations

  • Boundary Conditions and Extent of Applicability for the Reduced Size Models Reduced Size Models Parameter Reduced-Size Model URE MRE LRE Bottom of Model*

0.0 cm

-191.206 cm

-363.296 cm Bottom Boundary Condition Reflective Void Void Top of Model*

343 46 cm 190 289 cm 0 0 cm Top of Model 343.46 cm 190.289 cm 0.0 cm Top Boundary Condition Void Void Reflective Bottom Extent of Model Applicability*

75.0 cm

-75.0 cm

-330.0 cm

  • Dimensions are given relative to the active core midplane Top Extent of Model Applicability*

300.0 cm 75.0 cm

-75.0 cm Materials Analyzed in Model Weld W06 Weld W05 Weld W04 URE Weld 06 12 Dimensions are given relative to the active core midplane URE - Weld 06 MRE - Weld 05 LRE - Weld 04

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results

  • Calculated Neutron Fluence Rates for Catawba Unit 1 Cycle 3 Cycle 3 Model Calculated Neutron (E>1.0 MeV)

Fluence Rate (Flux) [n/cm2-s]

(

)

Weld W06 Weld W05 Weld W04 Reduced-Size Models (TORT) with TW 1.06E+09 2.36E+10 1.91E+09 Reduced-Size Models (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW 1 06E+09 2 36E+10 1 90E+09 Reduced-Size Models (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW 1.06E+09 2.36E+10 1.90E+09 RAPTOR-M3G Model in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 with TW 1.06E+09 2.36E+10 1.90E+09 RAPTOR-M3G Model in WCAP-17669-NP Rev 0 1 14E+09 2 33E+10 1 98E+09 RAPTOR M3G Model in WCAP 17669 NP, Rev. 0 1.14E+09 2.33E+10 1.98E+09 TORT and RAPTOR-M3G with TW methods give identical results (<1%)

13 identical results (<1%).

RAPTOR-M3G with DTW method yields more conservative results for limiting weld W06

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results

  • Calculated Neutron Fluence Rates for Catawba Unit 1 Cycle 21 Cycle 21 Model Calculated Neutron (E>1.0 MeV)

Fluence Rate (Flux) [n/cm2-s]

(

)

Weld W06 Weld W05 Weld W04 Reduced-Size Models (TORT) with TW 6.41E+08 1.54E+10 1.20E+09 Reduced-Size Models (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW 6 40E+08 1 54E+10 1 20E+09 Reduced-Size Models (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW 6.40E+08 1.54E+10 1.20E+09 RAPTOR-M3G Model in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 with TW 6.40E+08 1.54E+10 1.20E+09 RAPTOR-M3G Model in WCAP-17669-NP Rev 0 6 98E+08 1 54E+10 1 26E+09 RAPTOR M3G Model in WCAP 17669 NP, Rev. 0 6.98E+08 1.54E+10 1.26E+09 TORT and RAPTOR-M3G with TW methods give identical results (<1%)

14 identical results (<1%).

RAPTOR-M3G with DTW method yields more conservative results for limiting weld W06

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Results

  • Calculated Neutron Fluence after 54 EFPY at Catawba Unit 1 (Reduced-Size Models calculated using time-weighted 1 (Reduced Size Models calculated using time weighted average power distributions)

Model Calculated Neutron (E>1.0 MeV)

Fluence [n/cm2]

Fluence [n/cm2]

Weld W06 Weld W05 Weld W04 Reduced-Size Models (TORT) with TW 1.05E+18 2.66E+19 1.83E+18 Reduced-Size Models (RAPTOR-M3G) with TW 1.05E+18 2.66E+19 1.83E+18 RAPTOR-M3G Model in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 with TW 1.05E+18 (1.07E+18)*

2.66E+19 (2.63E+19)*

1.83E+18 (1.86E+18)*

  • The projected 54 EFPY fluence value in the parenthesis is calculated by accumulating cycle-specific fluence for cycles 1 through 22, and assuming Cycle 22 at MUR power for cycles beyond Cycle 22, the same approach used in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 RAPTOR-M3G Model in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 1.16E+18 2.60E+19 1.95E+18 15 TORT and RAPTOR-M3G with TW methods give identical results (<1%).

RAPTOR-M3G with DTW method yields more conservative results for limiting weld W06

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Conclusions Conclusions

  • TORT and RAPTOR-M3G produce nearly identical results, i e within 1% when using the same geometrical model i.e., within 1%, when using the same geometrical model and calculation control parameters
  • The results from RAPTOR-M3G and TORT agree better than the 13% uncertainty assigned to the calculational than the 13% uncertainty assigned to the calculational methodology and well within the 20% uncertainty deemed acceptable for RTPTS and RTNDT determination f

f C f

  • The fast neutron fluence reported to NRC for the limiting fluence at 54 EFPY (upper shell to intermediate shell circumferential weld W06) in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 is the bounding value
  • Therefore, the fast neutron flux / fluence values submitted to NRC in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 are acceptable 16 p

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Westinghouse RAI Response Calculation Conclusions Conclusions

  • The in-vessel surveillance capsule and ex-vessel neutron dosimetry data have been provided in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0, dosimetry data have been provided in WCAP 17669 NP, Rev. 0, Appendix C, the measurement-to-calculation (RAPTOR-M3G) comparisons show:

- The in-vessel dosimeters meet the +/-20% criteria for in-vessel ill l

R l

G id 1 190 surveillance capsules per Regulatory Guide 1.190

- The ex-vessel dosimeters meet the +/- 30% criteria for the cavity capsules per Regulatory Guide 1.190.

  • Further sensitivity study has shown:
  • Further sensitivity study has shown:

- Both the RAPTOR-M3G model used in WCAP-17669-NP, Rev. 0 and the reduced size models have achieved geometrical convergence, i.e., using much coarser mesh only changes the g

g y

g fluence results less than 2%.

- Using different quadrature sets (e.g., S12 vs. S8) only renders less than 3% difference in the calculated fluence values.

17

Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

© 2015 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Thank you !

Thank you !

Questions?

18