ML22179A250: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403                               Written Examination Grading                         Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:                             Date of Exam:             Exam Level: RO       i'KI SRO       ~
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist
Item Description                                           Initials a             b     C
 
                                                                                            ~ ~
Facility: Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO i'KI SRO ~
: 1.       Clean answer sheets copied before grading FL
 
: 2.         Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted)               fi:          p..1/cz t?~
Item Description Initials
: 3.         Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)                       R             ~ ~P3
 
: 4.         Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in                                 N)A detail N/A            vtA
a b C
: 5.         All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified                                                       N/A         N(A      µ{A
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading ~ ~
: 6.         Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants I::. tJ(Pt R            ~      i? d Date Printed Na~
FL
: a. Grader                                                     C0Ll1w >               q   /-2-t /4{
: 2. Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required fi: p..1/cz t?~
: b. Facility Reviewer(*)             ~                             ,               9/J.4/;8
(N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted)
                                        µic..1:,(kfi,L P-Zi-r1U-Siz                   I C.
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors ~ ~P3 (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) R
l
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in N/A vtA N)A detail
: d. NRC Supervisor (*)             R~-~~ oc\'.~ ,~ /           Ji         cl     0,.1:       ,~/wi I 1/
: 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades µ{A are justified N/A N(A
I  V
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training ~ i deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of R ?d questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants I::. tJ(Pt
(*)       The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
 
Printed Na ~ Date
: a. Grader C0Ll1w > q /-2-t /4{
: b. Facility Reviewer(*) ~, 9/J.4/;8
µic..1:,(kfi,L P-Zi-r1U-Siz I
 
C. l
: d. NRC Supervisor (*) R~-~ ~ oc\\'.~,~ / Ji cl wi I V I 1/ 0,.1:,~ /
 
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
 
ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}
ES-403, Page 6 of 6}}

Latest revision as of 18:19, 17 November 2024

2018 Prairie Island Ile ES-403-1 Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist
ML22179A250
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/16/2018
From: Randy Baker
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Nuclear Management Co
Baker R
Shared Package
ML17165A317 List:
References
Download: ML22179A250 (1)
v • d • e


Text

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist

Facility: Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO i'KI SRO ~

Item Description Initials

a b C

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading ~ ~

FL

2. Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required fi: p..1/cz t?~

(N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted)

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors ~ ~P3 (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) R
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in N/A vtA N)A detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades µ{A are justified N/A N(A
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training ~ i deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of R ?d questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants I::. tJ(Pt

Printed Na ~ Date

a. Grader C0Ll1w > q /-2-t /4{
b. Facility Reviewer(*) ~, 9/J.4/;8

µic..1:,(kfi,L P-Zi-r1U-Siz I

C. l

d. NRC Supervisor (*) R~-~ ~ oc\\'.~,~ / Ji cl wi I V I 1/ 0,.1:,~ /

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML22179A250&oldid=3725489"