ML20141A415: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 24: Line 24:
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==


By letter dated August 30, 1995, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (VYNPC) requested approval for the onsite disposal of slightly contaminated silt material removed from Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station's (Vermont Yankee's) cooling towers. In a safety evaluation (SE) dated March 4, 1996, the NRC staff approved the proposed silt disposal. However, because of discrepancies between the SE and VYNPC's letter of August 30, 1995, VYNPC l_              postponed-implementation of the silt disposal until resolution of the discrepancies. By letter dated August 2, 1996, VYNPC informed the NRC staff of the discrepancies and requested that the SE be revised accordingly.
By {{letter dated|date=August 30, 1995|text=letter dated August 30, 1995}}, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (VYNPC) requested approval for the onsite disposal of slightly contaminated silt material removed from Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station's (Vermont Yankee's) cooling towers. In a safety evaluation (SE) dated March 4, 1996, the NRC staff approved the proposed silt disposal. However, because of discrepancies between the SE and VYNPC's letter of August 30, 1995, VYNPC l_              postponed-implementation of the silt disposal until resolution of the discrepancies. By {{letter dated|date=August 2, 1996|text=letter dated August 2, 1996}}, VYNPC informed the NRC staff of the discrepancies and requested that the SE be revised accordingly.
Recognizing the discrepancies, the NRC staff has prepared this SE to resolve the discrepancies and to replace the SE of March 4,1996.
Recognizing the discrepancies, the NRC staff has prepared this SE to resolve the discrepancies and to replace the SE of March 4,1996.


==2.0 BACKGROUND==
==2.0 BACKGROUND==


j              VYNPC has previously obtained NRC staff approval of the onsite disposal of very-low-level radioactive material similar to the proposed silt disposal.                                                    By letter dated June 28, 1989, VYNPC proposed the onsite disposal of slightly contaminated septic waste material by land application at Vermont Yankee. By letter dated August 30, 1989, the NRC staff approved this request pursuant to l              10 CFR 20.302 (now 10 CFR 20.2002). The NRC staff considered this site-l          .
j              VYNPC has previously obtained NRC staff approval of the onsite disposal of very-low-level radioactive material similar to the proposed silt disposal.                                                    By {{letter dated|date=June 28, 1989|text=letter dated June 28, 1989}}, VYNPC proposed the onsite disposal of slightly contaminated septic waste material by land application at Vermont Yankee. By {{letter dated|date=August 30, 1989|text=letter dated August 30, 1989}}, the NRC staff approved this request pursuant to l              10 CFR 20.302 (now 10 CFR 20.2002). The NRC staff considered this site-l          .
specific application for Vermont Yankee to have insignificant radiological l              impact because the proposed septic waste material disposal involved licensed l              material containing less than 0.1 percent of the radioactive material, primarily cobalt-60 and cesium-137, already considered acceptable in the Final Environmental Statement (FES) of July 1972, and involved exposure pathways much less significant than those in the FES. In addition, the proposed septic waste material disposal satisfied the following applicable boundary conditions for the disposal of licensed material:
specific application for Vermont Yankee to have insignificant radiological l              impact because the proposed septic waste material disposal involved licensed l              material containing less than 0.1 percent of the radioactive material, primarily cobalt-60 and cesium-137, already considered acceptable in the Final Environmental Statement (FES) of July 1972, and involved exposure pathways much less significant than those in the FES. In addition, the proposed septic waste material disposal satisfied the following applicable boundary conditions for the disposal of licensed material:
: a. The whole body dose to the hypothetical maximally exposed individual must be less than 1.0 mres/ year.
: a. The whole body dose to the hypothetical maximally exposed individual must be less than 1.0 mres/ year.
Line 39: Line 39:
: c. The disposal must be at the same site.
: c. The disposal must be at the same site.
Following the NRC staff's approval on August 30, 1989, VYNPC implemented the disposal of the contaminated septic waste material as proposed.
Following the NRC staff's approval on August 30, 1989, VYNPC implemented the disposal of the contaminated septic waste material as proposed.
By letter dated August 30, 1995, VYNPC requested that the previous                '
By {{letter dated|date=August 30, 1995|text=letter dated August 30, 1995}}, VYNPC requested that the previous                '
authorization for the onsite disposal of very-low-level radioactive material      ;
authorization for the onsite disposal of very-low-level radioactive material      ;
be amended to permit the onsite disposal of slightly contaminated silt material, within the boundary conditions of the previously approved septic waste material disposal.
be amended to permit the onsite disposal of slightly contaminated silt material, within the boundary conditions of the previously approved septic waste material disposal.
3.0 EVALUATION In its letter of August 30, 1995, VYNPC stated that the proposed silt disposal method is the same as the previously approved septic waste disposal method, and utilizes land spreading in the same onsite areas approved for septic waste disposal. The volume of silt proposed for onsite disposal consists of 14,000 cubic feet (396 cubic meters) accumulated through August 1995 plus approximately 4,000 cubic feet (113 cubic meters) to be removed from the cooling towers during each 18-month operating cycle. The activity contained
3.0 EVALUATION In its letter of August 30, 1995, VYNPC stated that the proposed silt disposal method is the same as the previously approved septic waste disposal method, and utilizes land spreading in the same onsite areas approved for septic waste disposal. The volume of silt proposed for onsite disposal consists of 14,000 cubic feet (396 cubic meters) accumulated through August 1995 plus approximately 4,000 cubic feet (113 cubic meters) to be removed from the cooling towers during each 18-month operating cycle. The activity contained
       -in the currently accumulated silt, based on samples taken by VYNPC in June 1995, is 0.193 millicuries, principally from 0.034 millicuries of cobalt-60 and 0.159 millicur les of cesium-137. The activity contained in the additional silt to be removed from the cooling towers each 18-month operating cycle is anticipated to be 0.059 millicuries, principally from 0.012 millicuries of cobalt-60 and 0.047 . millicuries of cesium-137.
       -in the currently accumulated silt, based on samples taken by VYNPC in June 1995, is 0.193 millicuries, principally from 0.034 millicuries of cobalt-60 and 0.159 millicur les of cesium-137. The activity contained in the additional silt to be removed from the cooling towers each 18-month operating cycle is anticipated to be 0.059 millicuries, principally from 0.012 millicuries of cobalt-60 and 0.047 . millicuries of cesium-137.
VYNPC's radiological assessment enclosed with its August 30, 1995, letter demonstrates that the combined radiological impact for all onsite disposal operations, the proposed disposal of silt and the previously approved disposal of septic waste material, will continue to meet the applicable boundary conditions (given above) for the disposal of licensed material. Therefore, the proposed onsite disposal of slightly contaminated silt is acceptable.
VYNPC's radiological assessment enclosed with its {{letter dated|date=August 30, 1995|text=August 30, 1995, letter}} demonstrates that the combined radiological impact for all onsite disposal operations, the proposed disposal of silt and the previously approved disposal of septic waste material, will continue to meet the applicable boundary conditions (given above) for the disposal of licensed material. Therefore, the proposed onsite disposal of slightly contaminated silt is acceptable.
As discussed in VYNPC's letter of August 2,1996, if the onsite disposal of cooling tower silt or septic waste material would result in exceeding the applicable boundary conditions (given above), then VYNPC must obtain prior NRC staff approval of the disposal. In addition, VYNPC made the following commitments:
As discussed in VYNPC's letter of August 2,1996, if the onsite disposal of cooling tower silt or septic waste material would result in exceeding the applicable boundary conditions (given above), then VYNPC must obtain prior NRC staff approval of the disposal. In addition, VYNPC made the following commitments:
: a. VYNFC will report in the Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report a list of the radionuclides present and the total r:tdioactivity associated with the onsite disposal activities at Vermont Yankee.
: a. VYNFC will report in the Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report a list of the radionuclides present and the total r:tdioactivity associated with the onsite disposal activities at Vermont Yankee.

Latest revision as of 14:20, 12 December 2021

Revised SE Accepting Proposed Onsite Disposal of Slightly Contaminated Silt Removed from Vermont Yankee Cooling Towers
ML20141A415
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 06/18/1997
From:
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:
Shared Package
ML20141A383 List:
References
NUDOCS 9706200266
Download: ML20141A415 (4)


Text

.- _ _. ._____.____m _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - _ _ _ _ . .

e p k UNITED STATES j

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMid,alON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20066 4001 o

SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO ONSITE DISPOSAL OF SLIGHTLY CONTAMINATED COOLING TOWER SILT VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER CORPORAIION VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER STATION DOCKET NO. 50-271

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter dated August 30, 1995, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (VYNPC) requested approval for the onsite disposal of slightly contaminated silt material removed from Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station's (Vermont Yankee's) cooling towers. In a safety evaluation (SE) dated March 4, 1996, the NRC staff approved the proposed silt disposal. However, because of discrepancies between the SE and VYNPC's letter of August 30, 1995, VYNPC l_ postponed-implementation of the silt disposal until resolution of the discrepancies. By letter dated August 2, 1996, VYNPC informed the NRC staff of the discrepancies and requested that the SE be revised accordingly.

Recognizing the discrepancies, the NRC staff has prepared this SE to resolve the discrepancies and to replace the SE of March 4,1996.

2.0 BACKGROUND

j VYNPC has previously obtained NRC staff approval of the onsite disposal of very-low-level radioactive material similar to the proposed silt disposal. By letter dated June 28, 1989, VYNPC proposed the onsite disposal of slightly contaminated septic waste material by land application at Vermont Yankee. By letter dated August 30, 1989, the NRC staff approved this request pursuant to l 10 CFR 20.302 (now 10 CFR 20.2002). The NRC staff considered this site-l .

specific application for Vermont Yankee to have insignificant radiological l impact because the proposed septic waste material disposal involved licensed l material containing less than 0.1 percent of the radioactive material, primarily cobalt-60 and cesium-137, already considered acceptable in the Final Environmental Statement (FES) of July 1972, and involved exposure pathways much less significant than those in the FES. In addition, the proposed septic waste material disposal satisfied the following applicable boundary conditions for the disposal of licensed material:

a. The whole body dose to the hypothetical maximally exposed individual must be less than 1.0 mres/ year.

l l

9706200266 970618 PDR ADOCK 05000271 P PDR

. {

b. Doses to the whole body and any organ of an inadvertent intruder from the probable pathways of exposure are less than 5 mres/ year.
c. The disposal must be at the same site.

Following the NRC staff's approval on August 30, 1989, VYNPC implemented the disposal of the contaminated septic waste material as proposed.

By letter dated August 30, 1995, VYNPC requested that the previous '

authorization for the onsite disposal of very-low-level radioactive material  ;

be amended to permit the onsite disposal of slightly contaminated silt material, within the boundary conditions of the previously approved septic waste material disposal.

3.0 EVALUATION In its letter of August 30, 1995, VYNPC stated that the proposed silt disposal method is the same as the previously approved septic waste disposal method, and utilizes land spreading in the same onsite areas approved for septic waste disposal. The volume of silt proposed for onsite disposal consists of 14,000 cubic feet (396 cubic meters) accumulated through August 1995 plus approximately 4,000 cubic feet (113 cubic meters) to be removed from the cooling towers during each 18-month operating cycle. The activity contained

-in the currently accumulated silt, based on samples taken by VYNPC in June 1995, is 0.193 millicuries, principally from 0.034 millicuries of cobalt-60 and 0.159 millicur les of cesium-137. The activity contained in the additional silt to be removed from the cooling towers each 18-month operating cycle is anticipated to be 0.059 millicuries, principally from 0.012 millicuries of cobalt-60 and 0.047 . millicuries of cesium-137.

VYNPC's radiological assessment enclosed with its August 30, 1995, letter demonstrates that the combined radiological impact for all onsite disposal operations, the proposed disposal of silt and the previously approved disposal of septic waste material, will continue to meet the applicable boundary conditions (given above) for the disposal of licensed material. Therefore, the proposed onsite disposal of slightly contaminated silt is acceptable.

As discussed in VYNPC's letter of August 2,1996, if the onsite disposal of cooling tower silt or septic waste material would result in exceeding the applicable boundary conditions (given above), then VYNPC must obtain prior NRC staff approval of the disposal. In addition, VYNPC made the following commitments:

a. VYNFC will report in the Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report a list of the radionuclides present and the total r:tdioactivity associated with the onsite disposal activities at Vermont Yankee.

. b. VYNPC will maintain records of radionuclide concentrations and total activity associated with onsite disposal activities at Vermont Yankee in accordance with 10 CFR 50.75(g).

4.0 CONCLUSION

The NRC staff finds that the radiological conditions at the Vermont Yankee  !

site (see attachment) that would result from the onsite disposal of slightly l contaminated silt material, as proposed by VYNPC pursuant to 10 CFR 20.2002, 1 and the previously approved onsite disposal of slightly contaminated septic l

waste material, are within the applicable boundary conditions (given above) l for the disposal of licensed material. Therefore, the proposed onsite disposal of slightly contaminated silt removed from Vermont Yankee's cooling towers is acceptable.

VYNPC is required to permanently incorporate this SE into the Vermont Yankee l Offsite Dose Calculation Manual as an Appendix to document the the radioactive l material onsite disposal activities approved for Vermont Yankee, and VYNPC's related commitments regarding reporting and record keeping. Any additional modification of VYNPC's disposal activities which go beyond those proposed in the August 30, 1995, submittal, and are not addressed above must have prior NRC staff approval. In addition, any onsite disposal of cooling tower silt or I septic waste material that would result in exceeding the applicable boundary conditions (given above), must also have prior NRC staff approval.

Principal Contributors: J. Minns D. Dorman C. Harbuck Date: June 18, 1997 l

Attachment:

Vermont Yankee Site Area Map i -

l l

l i

i

}

l i-l

p . . = - y x%.

( N \ e

,f \%\

\

lr qd. - => y/-

\ *  %

s

I -. . ..-- ..... x .

n x-

\ c.'

-[-..% -- . ..:%

~

f '.'. .'- \ ,

../s -

y  ;- ,<

/

. . ~

\ S,.

' , y , f- ) ** -.~~~ "'v c a . _ _-y%g h \

Tl

/ ,.

i

'. ;/ $ **. x  %**

. m' s 1

(' / , - ' ' ':i, -

i \~

- (/ i C* . y j

/

C , , p . .,.... \ , ... .

[#y,: .

, ~I'

/ .'

i

~y'

/ ,- -

0 6 ,t.- f '

y.K,. DICT- c p ~EW' sm ,Geptage Disposal Site B

^ '. &

/ ,. -

{ C  ;

( n - . -

Q 7

/ / i-  ; d.

m.s

.j / .. ., 1 -41 lf }n' '-. .-

,. '~

~

,, r ,--~../ N

,,,..- / .

- a,..... .. <

. ,. . tX^c;G:/, .% .

. u . . .  :

/ ' ;.- e

~_

'.. ./ lll l1li.

~~

\ .3 /

s' -Qf

+

37'/ ,

s j -

c-N

/

s o--

Q

/ / de, x

! ' Sept. age Disposal Site A 4* \

e -

% 8. ,,

e N%. C.N ~ ~' \

77

/ f  ;, #

, G z L_./y-

  • _, . . . . - .=.-.- - . :. .~ ~ ~ ^ ..
14. /' ,

s y . FIGURE h 9

o GEPTIC b'ASTE DISPCSAL AREAS

'E 3

rn Z

_ . . _ _ _ _ _ _