05000458/FIN-2014007-02: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
| identified by = NRC
| identified by = NRC
| Inspection procedure = IP 71111.21
| Inspection procedure = IP 71111.21
| Inspector = G Gardner, G George, J Zudans, M Kennard, N Okonkwo, T Farnholtz, T Skaggs,_Ryan A, Dunlo
| Inspector = G Gardner, G George, J Zudans, M Kennard, N Okonkwo, T Farnholtz, T Skaggs Ryan, A Dunlop
| CCA = H.6
| CCA = H.6
| INPO aspect = WP.2
| INPO aspect = WP.2
| description = The inspectors identified a Green, non-cited violation of Technical Specification 5.4.1, Procedures, which states, in part, Written procedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained, covering the following activities: The applicable procedures recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, February 1978. Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Section 9, Procedures for Performing Maintenance, paragraph b., requires that preventive maintenance schedules should be developed to specify lubrication schedules, inspections of equipment, and inspection or replacement of parts that have a specific lifetime. Specifically, the licensee failed to implement the six-year cleaning and inspection preventive maintenance for Division III 4160 Vac safety-related circuit breakers, E22-S004-ACB1, E22-S004-ACB2, and E22-S004-ACB4. These conditions do not represent an immediate safety concern. These conditions have been entered into the licensees corrective action program as Condition Reports CR-RBS-2014-4106 and CR-RBS-2014-4108. This performance deficiency was more than minor, and therefore a finding, because it was associated with the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone and adversely affects the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to events to prevent undesirable consequences. Specifically, the licensees failure to complete preventive maintenance reduces the reliability and capability of the safety-related circuit breakers. In accordance with Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix A, The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At- Power, dated June 19, 2012, Exhibit 2, Mitigating Systems Screening Questions, the issue screened as having very low safety significance (Green) because it was a design or qualification deficiency that did not represent a loss of operability or functionality; did not represent an actual loss of safety function of the system or train; did not result in the loss of one or more trains of non-technical specification equipment; and did not screen as potentially risk-significant due to seismic, flooding, or severe weather. This finding had a cross-cutting aspect associated with design margin in the area of human performance because the licensee did not operate or maintain equipment within design margin and failed to make changes to the margin through a systematic and rigorous process [H.6].
| description = The inspectors identified a Green, non-cited violation of Technical Specification 5.4.1, Procedures, which states, in part, Written procedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained, covering the following activities: The applicable procedures recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, February 1978. Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A, Section 9, Procedures for Performing Maintenance, paragraph b., requires that preventive maintenance schedules should be developed to specify lubrication schedules, inspections of equipment, and inspection or replacement of parts that have a specific lifetime. Specifically, the licensee failed to implement the six-year cleaning and inspection preventive maintenance for Division III 4160 Vac safety-related circuit breakers, E22-S004-ACB1, E22-S004-ACB2, and E22-S004-ACB4. These conditions do not represent an immediate safety concern. These conditions have been entered into the licensees corrective action program as Condition Reports CR-RBS-2014-4106 and CR-RBS-2014-4108. This performance deficiency was more than minor, and therefore a finding, because it was associated with the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone and adversely affects the cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to events to prevent undesirable consequences. Specifically, the licensees failure to complete preventive maintenance reduces the reliability and capability of the safety-related circuit breakers. In accordance with Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix A, The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At- Power, dated June 19, 2012, Exhibit 2, Mitigating Systems Screening Questions, the issue screened as having very low safety significance (Green) because it was a design or qualification deficiency that did not represent a loss of operability or functionality; did not represent an actual loss of safety function of the system or train; did not result in the loss of one or more trains of non-technical specification equipment; and did not screen as potentially risk-significant due to seismic, flooding, or severe weather. This finding had a cross-cutting aspect associated with design margin in the area of human performance because the licensee did not operate or maintain equipment within design margin and failed to make changes to the margin through a systematic and rigorous process [H.6].
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 20:51, 20 February 2018

02
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Report IR 05000458/2014007 Section 1R21
Date counted Sep 30, 2014 (2014Q3)
Type: NCV: Green
cornerstone Mitigating Systems
Identified by: NRC identified
Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21
Inspectors (proximate) G Gardner
G George
J Zudans
M Kennard
N Okonkwo
T Farnholtz
T Skaggs Ryan
A Dunlop
Violation of: Technical Specification - Procedures

Technical Specification
CCA H.6, Design Margins
INPO aspect WP.2
'