ML12201A364: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML12201A364
| number = ML12201A364
| issue date = 07/19/2012
| issue date = 07/19/2012
| title = Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2 - Acceptance Review License Amendment Request Supporting Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Change (TAC Nos. ME8914 and ME8915)
| title = Acceptance Review License Amendment Request Supporting Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Change
| author name = Beltz T A
| author name = Beltz T
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| addressee name = Costedio J
| addressee name = Costedio J
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000266, 05000301
| docket = 05000266, 05000301
| license number = DPR-024, DPR-027
| license number = DPR-024, DPR-027
| contact person = Beltz T A
| contact person = Beltz T
| case reference number = TAC ME8914, TAC ME8915
| case reference number = TAC ME8914, TAC ME8915
| document type = E-Mail, Acceptance Review Letter
| document type = E-Mail, Acceptance Review Letter
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project = TAC:ME8914, TAC:ME8915
| project = TAC:ME8914, TAC:ME8915
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1Zeleznock, KarenFrom:Beltz, TerrySent:Thursday, July 19, 2012 6:06 AMTo:'Costedio, James'Cc:'Hennessy, William'; 'Scherwinski, Brenda'; Zeleznock, KarenSubject:Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2 - Acceptance Review re: License Amendment Request Supporting Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Change (TAC Nos. ME8914 and ME8915)Attachments:image001.gifCategories:Monitor Dear Mr. Costedio:
{{#Wiki_filter:Zeleznock, Karen From:                         Beltz, Terry Sent:                         Thursday, July 19, 2012 6:06 AM To:                           'Costedio, James' Cc:                           'Hennessy, William'; 'Scherwinski, Brenda'; Zeleznock, Karen
 
==Subject:==
Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2 - Acceptance Review re: License Amendment Request Supporting Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Change (TAC Nos.
ME8914 and ME8915)
Attachments:                 image001.gif Categories:                   Monitor
 
==Dear Mr. Costedio:==
 
By letter dated June 18, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML121720480), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP), Units 1 and 2. The LAR includes a proposed change to the implementation milestone scope and a proposed revision to the renewed facility operating license physical protection license condition. Specifically, the licensee plans to implement the requirements of Implementation Milestone #6 with a minor deviation from what was previously described in the implementation milestone schedule approved in Amendment Nos. 243 and 247 to the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses for PBNP Units 1 and 2, respectively, dated July 21, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML111740077).
By letter dated June 18, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML121720480), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP), Units 1 and 2. The LAR includes a proposed change to the implementation milestone scope and a proposed revision to the renewed facility operating license physical protection license condition. Specifically, the licensee plans to implement the requirements of Implementation Milestone #6 with a minor deviation from what was previously described in the implementation milestone schedule approved in Amendment Nos. 243 and 247 to the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses for PBNP Units 1 and 2, respectively, dated July 21, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML111740077).
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the final results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed change. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that there appears to be sufficient technical information, both in scope and depth, to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the LAR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the final results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this request.
 
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed change. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Should you have any questions regarding this review, please contact me at (301) 415-3049. Sincerely, Terry A. Beltz, Senior Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-3049 Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov  
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that there appears to be sufficient technical information, both in scope and depth, to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the LAR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.
}}
If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Should you have any questions regarding this review, please contact me at (301) 415-3049.
Sincerely, Terry A. Beltz, Senior Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-3049 Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov 1}}

Latest revision as of 13:55, 20 March 2020

Acceptance Review License Amendment Request Supporting Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Change
ML12201A364
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/19/2012
From: Beltz T
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Jim Costedio
Point Beach
Beltz T
References
TAC ME8914, TAC ME8915
Download: ML12201A364 (1)


Text

Zeleznock, Karen From: Beltz, Terry Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 6:06 AM To: 'Costedio, James' Cc: 'Hennessy, William'; 'Scherwinski, Brenda'; Zeleznock, Karen

Subject:

Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2 - Acceptance Review re: License Amendment Request Supporting Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Change (TAC Nos.

ME8914 and ME8915)

Attachments: image001.gif Categories: Monitor

Dear Mr. Costedio:

By letter dated June 18, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML121720480), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP), Units 1 and 2. The LAR includes a proposed change to the implementation milestone scope and a proposed revision to the renewed facility operating license physical protection license condition. Specifically, the licensee plans to implement the requirements of Implementation Milestone #6 with a minor deviation from what was previously described in the implementation milestone schedule approved in Amendment Nos. 243 and 247 to the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses for PBNP Units 1 and 2, respectively, dated July 21, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML111740077).

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the final results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this request.

The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed change. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that there appears to be sufficient technical information, both in scope and depth, to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the LAR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.

If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Should you have any questions regarding this review, please contact me at (301) 415-3049.

Sincerely, Terry A. Beltz, Senior Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-3049 Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov 1