ML16250A028: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML16250A028 | | number = ML16250A028 | ||
| issue date = 08/31/2016 | | issue date = 08/31/2016 | ||
| title = | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance for Review of License Amendment Request to Add Copernic Fuel Performance Code to TS | ||
| author name = Hall J | | author name = Hall J | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | ||
| addressee name = Wasik C | | addressee name = Wasik C | ||
| addressee affiliation = Duke Energy Corp | | addressee affiliation = Duke Energy Corp | ||
| docket = 05000269, 05000270, 05000287 | | docket = 05000269, 05000270, 05000287 | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Hall, Randy Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 3:56 PM To: Wasik, Christopher J (Christopher.Wasik@duke-energy.com) | ||
Cc:Newman, Stephen (Stephen | Cc: Newman, Stephen (Stephen.Newman@duke-energy.com) | ||
.Newman@duke-energy.com) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance for Review of License Amendment Request to Add COPERNIC | Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance for Review of License Amendment Request to Add COPERNIC Fuel Performance Code to TS (CAC Nos. | ||
MF8158, MF8159, and MF8160)August 31, 2016 Mr. Christopher J. Wasik Manager, Regulatory Affairs Oconee Nuclear Station | MF8158, MF8159, and MF8160) | ||
August 31, 2016 Mr. Christopher J. Wasik Manager, Regulatory Affairs Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | |||
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 - ACCEPTANCE FOR REVIEW OF LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADD COPERNIC FUEL PERFORMANCE CODE TO TS (CAC NOS. MF8158, MF8159, AND MF8160) | OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 - ACCEPTANCE FOR REVIEW OF LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADD COPERNIC FUEL PERFORMANCE CODE TO TS (CAC NOS. MF8158, MF8159, AND MF8160) | ||
Chris: | Chris: | ||
By letter dated July 21, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16209A223 | By letter dated July 21, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16209A223), Duke Energy (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS), Units 1, 2, and 3. The proposed amendment would add the COPERNIC Fuel Performance Code to Technical Specifications 2.1.1.1 and 5.6.5. | ||
), Duke Energy (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS), Units 1, 2, and 3. The proposed amendment would add the COPERNIC Fuel Performance Code to Technical Specifications 2.1.1.1 and 5.6.5. | In accordance with NRC's process as described in LIC-109, "Acceptance Review Procedures," the NRC staff has performed an acceptance review of the amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
In accordance with NRC's process as described in LIC-109, "Acceptance Review Procedures," the NRC staff has performed an acceptance review of the amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-4032. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-4032. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, 1 | ||
James R. (Randy) Hall, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation USNRC (301) 415-4032 Randy.Hall@nrc.gov 2 | |||
Hearing Identifier: | Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3030 Mail Envelope Properties (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov20160831155600) | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance for Review of License Amendment Request to Add COPERNIC Fuel Performance Code to TS (CAC Nos. MF8158, MF8159, and MF8160) | Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance for Review of License Amendment Request to Add COPERNIC Fuel Performance Code to TS (CAC Nos. MF8158, MF8159, and MF8160) | ||
Sent Date: | Sent Date: 8/31/2016 3:56:22 PM Received Date: 8/31/2016 3:56:00 PM From: Hall, Randy Created By: Randy.Hall@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
"Newman, Stephen (Stephen.Newman@duke-energy.com)" <Stephen.Newman@duke-energy.com> | |||
Recipients: | Tracking Status: None "Wasik, Christopher J (Christopher.Wasik@duke-energy.com)" <Christopher.Wasik@duke-energy.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | |||
Post Office: | Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2936 8/31/2016 3:56:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: | ||
Recipients Received:}} |
Latest revision as of 00:31, 19 March 2020
ML16250A028 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oconee |
Issue date: | 08/31/2016 |
From: | Hall J Plant Licensing Branch II |
To: | Wasik C Duke Energy Corp |
References | |
MF8158, MF8159, MF8160 | |
Download: ML16250A028 (3) | |
Text
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Hall, Randy Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 3:56 PM To: Wasik, Christopher J (Christopher.Wasik@duke-energy.com)
Cc: Newman, Stephen (Stephen.Newman@duke-energy.com)
Subject:
Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance for Review of License Amendment Request to Add COPERNIC Fuel Performance Code to TS (CAC Nos.
MF8158, MF8159, and MF8160)
August 31, 2016 Mr. Christopher J. Wasik Manager, Regulatory Affairs Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
SUBJECT:
OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 - ACCEPTANCE FOR REVIEW OF LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADD COPERNIC FUEL PERFORMANCE CODE TO TS (CAC NOS. MF8158, MF8159, AND MF8160)
Chris:
By letter dated July 21, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16209A223), Duke Energy (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS), Units 1, 2, and 3. The proposed amendment would add the COPERNIC Fuel Performance Code to Technical Specifications 2.1.1.1 and 5.6.5.
In accordance with NRC's process as described in LIC-109, "Acceptance Review Procedures," the NRC staff has performed an acceptance review of the amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-4032.
Sincerely, 1
James R. (Randy) Hall, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation USNRC (301) 415-4032 Randy.Hall@nrc.gov 2
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3030 Mail Envelope Properties (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov20160831155600)
Subject:
Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 - Acceptance for Review of License Amendment Request to Add COPERNIC Fuel Performance Code to TS (CAC Nos. MF8158, MF8159, and MF8160)
Sent Date: 8/31/2016 3:56:22 PM Received Date: 8/31/2016 3:56:00 PM From: Hall, Randy Created By: Randy.Hall@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Newman, Stephen (Stephen.Newman@duke-energy.com)" <Stephen.Newman@duke-energy.com>
Tracking Status: None "Wasik, Christopher J (Christopher.Wasik@duke-energy.com)" <Christopher.Wasik@duke-energy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2936 8/31/2016 3:56:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: