ML092190384: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML092190384 | | number = ML092190384 | ||
| issue date = 08/10/2009 | | issue date = 08/10/2009 | ||
| title = Letter to Citizens Power Dated August 10, 2009, Response to July 7, 2009, Regarding Concerns with Containment Liners at Beaver Valley Units 1 & 2, and Belief Proposed Inspection Techniques Are Insufficient Given Discovery of Corrosion Went | | title = Letter to Citizens Power Dated August 10, 2009, Response to July 7, 2009, Regarding Concerns with Containment Liners at Beaver Valley Units 1 & 2, and Belief Proposed Inspection Techniques Are Insufficient Given Discovery of Corrosion Went | ||
| author name = Hackett E | | author name = Hackett E | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/ACRS | | author affiliation = NRC/ACRS | ||
| addressee name = Robinson T | | addressee name = Robinson T | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS WASHINGTON, DC 20555 - 0001 August 10, 2009 Mr. Theodore Robinson, Esq. Citizen Power 2121 Murray Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15217 | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS WASHINGTON, DC 20555 - 0001 August 10, 2009 Mr. Theodore Robinson, Esq. | ||
Citizen Power 2121 Murray Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15217 | |||
==Dear Mr. Robinson:== | ==Dear Mr. Robinson:== | ||
This letter is in response to your letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) dated July 7, 2009, regarding your concerns with the containment liners at Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, and your belief that the proposed inspection techniques are insufficient given the discovery of corrosion that went through-wall on Unit 1. In its July 2009 Full Committee Meeting, the ACRS made your letter part of the record of the meeting and considered it in the deliberations regarding the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 license renewal application. | This letter is in response to your letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | ||
In addition, the ACRS has brought this matter to the attention of NRC management for appropriate disposition by the NRC staff. | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) dated July 7, 2009, regarding your concerns with the containment liners at Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, and your belief that the proposed inspection techniques are insufficient given the discovery of corrosion that went through-wall on Unit 1. In its July 2009 Full Committee Meeting, the ACRS made your letter part of the record of the meeting and considered it in the deliberations regarding the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 license renewal application. | ||
In addition, the ACRS has brought this matter to the attention of NRC management for appropriate disposition by the NRC staff. | |||
The ACRS plans to continue its discussions of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 license renewal application at its September 10-12, 2009 meeting. On behalf of the ACRS, I would like to thank you for your comments. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Edwin M. Hackett, Executive Director Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards | |||
Mr. Theodore Robinson, Esq. | |||
Citizen Power 2121 Murray Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15217 | |||
Mr. Theodore Robinson, Esq. Citizen Power 2121 Murray Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15217 | |||
==Dear Mr. Robinson:== | ==Dear Mr. Robinson:== | ||
This letter is in response to your letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) dated July 7, 2009, regarding your concerns with the containment liners at Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, and your belief that the proposed inspection techniques are insufficient given the discovery of corrosion that went through-wall on Unit 1. In its July 2009 Full Committee Meeting, the ACRS made your letter part of the record of the meeting and considered it in the deliberations regarding the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 license renewal application. | This letter is in response to your letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | ||
In addition, the ACRS has brought this matter to the attention of NRC management for appropriate disposition by the NRC staff. | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) dated July 7, 2009, regarding your concerns with the containment liners at Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, and your belief that the proposed inspection techniques are insufficient given the discovery of corrosion that went through-wall on Unit 1. In its July 2009 Full Committee Meeting, the ACRS made your letter part of the record of the meeting and considered it in the deliberations regarding the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 license renewal application. | ||
In addition, the ACRS has brought this matter to the attention of NRC management for appropriate disposition by the NRC staff. | |||
The ACRS plans to continue its discussions of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 license renewal application at its September 10-12, 2009 meeting. On behalf of the ACRS Sincerely, | The ACRS plans to continue its discussions of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 license renewal application at its September 10-12, 2009 meeting. On behalf of the ACRS Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ | |||
Edwin M. Hackett, Executive Director Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards cc: | |||
Viewing Rights: | C. Santos A. Dias S. Duraiswamy B. Holian D. Wrona K. Howard Accession No: ML092190384 Publicly Available (Y): ____ Sensitive (N): | ||
NRC Users | If Sensitive, which category? | ||
Viewing Rights: NRC Users or ACRS only or See restricted distribution OFFICE ACRS SUNSI Review ACRS ACRS NAME KWeaver /CBrown KWeaver/CBrown CSantos/ADias EHackett DATE 08/ 10 /09 08/ 10 /09 08/ 10 /09 08/ 10 /09 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}} |
Latest revision as of 11:05, 12 March 2020
ML092190384 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Beaver Valley |
Issue date: | 08/10/2009 |
From: | Hackett E Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
To: | Robinson T Citizen Power |
References | |
Download: ML092190384 (2) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS WASHINGTON, DC 20555 - 0001 August 10, 2009 Mr. Theodore Robinson, Esq.
Citizen Power 2121 Murray Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15217
Dear Mr. Robinson:
This letter is in response to your letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) dated July 7, 2009, regarding your concerns with the containment liners at Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, and your belief that the proposed inspection techniques are insufficient given the discovery of corrosion that went through-wall on Unit 1. In its July 2009 Full Committee Meeting, the ACRS made your letter part of the record of the meeting and considered it in the deliberations regarding the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 license renewal application.
In addition, the ACRS has brought this matter to the attention of NRC management for appropriate disposition by the NRC staff.
The ACRS plans to continue its discussions of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 license renewal application at its September 10-12, 2009 meeting. On behalf of the ACRS, I would like to thank you for your comments.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Edwin M. Hackett, Executive Director Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
Mr. Theodore Robinson, Esq.
Citizen Power 2121 Murray Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15217
Dear Mr. Robinson:
This letter is in response to your letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) dated July 7, 2009, regarding your concerns with the containment liners at Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2, and your belief that the proposed inspection techniques are insufficient given the discovery of corrosion that went through-wall on Unit 1. In its July 2009 Full Committee Meeting, the ACRS made your letter part of the record of the meeting and considered it in the deliberations regarding the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 license renewal application.
In addition, the ACRS has brought this matter to the attention of NRC management for appropriate disposition by the NRC staff.
The ACRS plans to continue its discussions of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2 license renewal application at its September 10-12, 2009 meeting. On behalf of the ACRS Sincerely,
/RA/
Edwin M. Hackett, Executive Director Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards cc:
C. Santos A. Dias S. Duraiswamy B. Holian D. Wrona K. Howard Accession No: ML092190384 Publicly Available (Y): ____ Sensitive (N):
If Sensitive, which category?
Viewing Rights: NRC Users or ACRS only or See restricted distribution OFFICE ACRS SUNSI Review ACRS ACRS NAME KWeaver /CBrown KWeaver/CBrown CSantos/ADias EHackett DATE 08/ 10 /09 08/ 10 /09 08/ 10 /09 08/ 10 /09 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY