ML18044A316: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML18044A316 | | number = ML18044A316 | ||
| issue date = 02/13/2018 | | issue date = 02/13/2018 | ||
| title = Acceptance Review for Request for Alternative ISI-09, Reactor Pressure Vessel Circumferential Shell Weld Exam | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2, Acceptance Review for Request for Alternative ISI-09, Reactor Pressure Vessel Circumferential Shell Weld Exam | ||
| author name = Hon A | | author name = Hon A | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the LAR has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the LAR has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed the LAR and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request. However, NRC staffs determination does not preclude the request for additional information as the review proceeds. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite the completion of the acceptance review. | The NRC staff has reviewed the LAR and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request. However, NRC staffs determination does not preclude the request for additional information as the review proceeds. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite the completion of the acceptance review. | ||
The NRC staff estimates that this LAR will take approximately 280 hours to complete and that the review can be completed within the time period requested by the licensee. These estimates are based on the staffs initial review of the LAR and they could change due to several factors, including requests for additional information and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in the review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion dates or hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated to you. | The NRC staff estimates that this LAR will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::280 hours]] to complete and that the review can be completed within the time period requested by the licensee. These estimates are based on the staffs initial review of the LAR and they could change due to several factors, including requests for additional information and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in the review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion dates or hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated to you. | ||
If you have any questions or need to discuss further, please let me know. | If you have any questions or need to discuss further, please let me know. | ||
Andy Hon, PE Project Manager (Brunswick Nuclear Plant 1 & 2, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 1 & 2) | Andy Hon, PE Project Manager (Brunswick Nuclear Plant 1 & 2, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 1 & 2) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:07, 7 March 2020
| ML18044A316 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 02/13/2018 |
| From: | Andrew Hon Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Murray W Duke Energy Carolinas |
| References | |
| L-2018-LLR-0001 | |
| Download: ML18044A316 (2) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Hon, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:13 AM To: Murray, William R. (Bill) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com)
Subject:
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2, Acceptance Review for Request for Alternative ISI-09, Re: Reactor Pressure Vessel Circumferential Shell Weld Exam (EPID:
By letter dated January 23, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML18023A134), Duke Energy Progress LLC (the licensee) submitted a request for alternative for Brunswick Steam Electric Plant (BSEP), Units 1 and 2. The request is related to meeting the requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code),Section XI, 2001 Edition through 2003 Addenda.
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the LAR has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed the LAR and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request. However, NRC staffs determination does not preclude the request for additional information as the review proceeds. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite the completion of the acceptance review.
The NRC staff estimates that this LAR will take approximately 280 hours11.667 days <br />1.667 weeks <br />0.384 months <br /> to complete and that the review can be completed within the time period requested by the licensee. These estimates are based on the staffs initial review of the LAR and they could change due to several factors, including requests for additional information and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in the review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion dates or hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated to you.
If you have any questions or need to discuss further, please let me know.
Andy Hon, PE Project Manager (Brunswick Nuclear Plant 1 & 2, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 1 & 2)
Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-8480 OWFN O8E06 Mail Stop O8B1A andrew.hon@nrc.gov 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 160 Mail Envelope Properties (Andrew.Hon@nrc.gov20180213111200)
Subject:
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2, Acceptance Review for Request for Alternative ISI-09, Re: Reactor Pressure Vessel Circumferential Shell Weld Exam (EPID:
Sent Date: 2/13/2018 11:12:59 AM Received Date: 2/13/2018 11:12:00 AM From: Hon, Andrew Created By: Andrew.Hon@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Murray, William R. (Bill) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com)"
<Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2662 2/13/2018 11:12:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: