ML18254A428: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML18254A428 | | number = ML18254A428 | ||
| issue date = 09/10/2018 | | issue date = 09/10/2018 | ||
| title = NRC Acceptance Review Regarding Changes to the Farley, Hatch, and Vogtle TS 5.2.2.g | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - NRC Acceptance Review Regarding Changes to the Farley, Hatch, and Vogtle TS 5.2.2.g | ||
| author name = Orenak M | | author name = Orenak M | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
: Ken, By letter dated August 9, 2018, Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC) submitted a license amendment request for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, (ADAMS Accession No. ML18226A094; EPID L-2018-LLA-0223) to revise Technical Specification 5.2.2.g and update the emergency plan minimum on-shift staff tables. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | : Ken, By letter dated August 9, 2018, Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC) submitted a license amendment request for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, (ADAMS Accession No. ML18226A094; EPID L-2018-LLA-0223) to revise Technical Specification 5.2.2.g and update the emergency plan minimum on-shift staff tables. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 300 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 10 months, which is April 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::300 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 10 months, which is April 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | If you have any questions, please contact me. | ||
Latest revision as of 07:30, 6 March 2020
| ML18254A428 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch, Vogtle, Farley  |
| Issue date: | 09/10/2018 |
| From: | Michael Orenak Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Lowery K Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
| References | |
| L-2018-LLA-0223 | |
| Download: ML18254A428 (2) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Orenak, Michael Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 4:26 PM To: Lowery, Ken G.
Cc: jamiemco@southernco.com
Subject:
NRC Acceptance Review Regarding Changes to the Farley, Hatch, and Vogtle TS 5.2.2.g
- Ken, By letter dated August 9, 2018, Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC) submitted a license amendment request for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, (ADAMS Accession No. ML18226A094; EPID L-2018-LLA-0223) to revise Technical Specification 5.2.2.g and update the emergency plan minimum on-shift staff tables. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 300 hours12.5 days <br />1.786 weeks <br />0.411 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 10 months, which is April 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Michael D. Orenak Palo Verde, Vogtle, and SNC Fleet Project Manager NRR - Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Phone: 301-415-3229 e-mail: Michael.Orenak@nrc.gov 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 555 Mail Envelope Properties (Michael.Orenak@nrc.gov20180910162500)
Subject:
NRC Acceptance Review Regarding Changes to the Farley, Hatch, and Vogtle TS 5.2.2.g Sent Date: 9/10/2018 4:25:52 PM Received Date: 9/10/2018 4:25:00 PM From: Orenak, Michael Created By: Michael.Orenak@nrc.gov Recipients:
"jamiemco@southernco.com" <jamiemco@southernco.com>
Tracking Status: None "Lowery, Ken G." <KGLOWERY@southernco.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3037 9/10/2018 4:25:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: