ML19007A006: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Consistent with 10 CFR 50.90, an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | Consistent with 10 CFR 50.90, an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 350 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 11 months, which is November 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::350 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 11 months, which is November 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. | ||
Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | ||
Latest revision as of 00:43, 6 March 2020
| ML19007A006 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Watts Bar  |
| Issue date: | 01/03/2019 |
| From: | Robert Schaaf Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Wells R Tennessee Valley Authority |
| References | |
| CNL-18-119, L-2018-LLA-0492, WBN-TS-18-08 | |
| Download: ML19007A006 (3) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Schaaf, Robert Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 10:13 AM To: 'Wells, Russell Douglas' Cc: Hulvey, Kimberly Dawn; 'Edmondson, Carla'; Saba, Farideh; Shoop, Undine
Subject:
Watts Bar Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance for Review - Application to Revise Technical Specifications Regarding Electrical Power Systems (L-2018-LLA-0492)
- Russ, By letter dated November 26, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML18331A134), the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-90 and NPF-96 for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN), Units 1 and 2, respectively. The proposed amendments would modify the technical specifications to support performance of the 6.9 kiloVolt and 480 Volt shutdown board maintenance for a defueled unit, while the opposite unit is operating in Mode 1, 2, 3, or 4.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with 10 CFR 50.90, an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 350 hours14.583 days <br />2.083 weeks <br />0.479 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 11 months, which is November 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review.
Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
1
If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-6020.
- Regards, Robert G. Schaaf Senior Project Manager
====================
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Mail Stop O-8B1A
====================
301-415-6020 Robert.Schaaf@nrc.gov 2
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 727 Mail Envelope Properties (BN7PR09MB269082606B2C4F6D6E076581F98D0)
Subject:
Watts Bar Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance for Review - Application to Revise Technical Specifications Regarding Electrical Power Systems (L-2018-LLA-0492)
Sent Date: 1/3/2019 10:12:39 AM Received Date: 1/3/2019 10:12:44 AM From: Schaaf, Robert Created By: Robert.Schaaf@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Hulvey, Kimberly Dawn" <kdhulvey@tva.gov>
Tracking Status: None
"'Edmondson, Carla'" <cedmondson@tva.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Saba, Farideh" <Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Shoop, Undine" <Undine.Shoop@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None
"'Wells, Russell Douglas'" <rdwells0@tva.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: BN7PR09MB2690.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3781 1/3/2019 10:12:44 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: