ML15188A190: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:October 2, 2008 L - 72 ,070 REPORT OF SOILS EXPLORATION ZION SOLUTIONS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION PREPARED FOR: | ||
SARGENT & LUNDY LLC 55 EAST MONROE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 PREPARED BY: | |||
TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 EAST GUNDERSEN DRIVE CAROL STREAM, ILLINOIS 60188 (630) 653-3920 | |||
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. TEXT 1.0 Introdu ction ............ . ......... .......... . .. . ...... .. ... .. . .. ... 2 2.0 Field Work 2 3.0 Geophysica l Testing .. . . .. ... . . .. . .. . .. . . . .......... .. . . * .. . .... . . . 4 4.0 Laboratory Testing 4 5.0 Closure 5 II. APPEND IX | |||
October 2, 2008 L-72,070 REPORT OF SOILS EXPLORATION ZION SOLUTIONS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION | |||
==1.0 INTRODUCTION== | ==1.0 INTRODUCTION== | ||
Presented in this report are the results of the soils investigation performed to determine the general subsurface conditions for the proposed construction of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage facility. The proposed structure will be constructed at the Zion Nuclear Power Plant in Zion, IL. | |||
This work was performed in general accordance with Technical Specification Subsurface Investigation Specification Z-5701 prepared by Sargent and Lundy and dated July 29, 2008. | |||
2.0 FIELD WORK A total of two(2) soil borings (1-20 and 1-21) were performed for this project with each of them being extended to a depth of 100.0 feet. Boring 1-20 was subsequently converted into a seismic cross hole survey source hole. Additionally, two (2) boreholes were drilled and completed with 3" PVC casing for cross hole seismic testing. | |||
Upon completion of the drilling and testing , ground surface elevations as well as Northing and Easting coordinates were determined for the drilling locations using a Trimble R8 GPS. The vertical and horizontal data shown on the Boring Location Plan was retrieved from a National Geodetic Survey data base located approximately 1.2 miles south of Zion, Illinois. | |||
Sargent & Lundy L - 72,070 October 2, 2008 The boreholes were initially advanced by 4 1/4" hollow stem auger methods to the ground water table and then completed by rotary wash methods using bentonite and potable water in accordance with ASTM D 5783. Upon completion, each borehole was sealed with cement-bentonite grout placed by tremie methods. | |||
Soil samples were collected at 1-20 on 2.5 foot intervals for the entire 100 foot depth. At location 1-20 the sampling interval was 2.5 feet for the first 10 feet and 5.0 feet thereafter. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) - N Values (ASTM D 1586), were determined using an automatic hammer which allows a 140 pound weight to free fall from a 30 inch drop to drive the sampler. The samples were collected using standard split spoon procedures during SPT since granular soils and/or very stiff clays prevented the use of Shelby tube samplers. Liners were not used with the split spoon samplers. | |||
Dynamic energy measurements have not been made on this automatic hammer. However, Pile Driving Analyzer's (PDA) have been used to process dynamic measurements of strain and acceleration between the drill string and similar hammers made by the same manufacturer (Boart Longyear). The Average Energy | |||
==Reference:== | ==Reference:== | ||
Geophysical Data Report Crosshole Seismic Results Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, llIinois | Geophysical Data Report Crosshole Seismic Results Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, llIinois | ||
==Dear Mr. Delaney:== | ==Dear Mr. Delaney:== | ||
Presented herein are the results of the crosshole seismic test for the referenced site. This work was conducted in general accordance with proposal P14676.00.85IS dated July 31, 2008. | |||
Presented in this report is a description of the geophysical method and data plots. | |||
It is a pleasure to be of service to you on this project If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at (314) 997-7440. | |||
Very truly yours, | |||
~J?l~ | |||
GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. | |||
Glen 1. Adams Dougl . Lambert, P.G. | |||
Senior Geophysicist Senior Project Manager-Geophysics GLAlDWL:gla/sjc Copies Submitted: (3) | |||
@prifllf1don recyded paper 11816LACKLAND ROAD. SUITE 150' SAINT LOUIS. MISSOURI 63146 | |||
* 314/997-7440 | * 314/997-7440 | ||
* FAX: 314/997-2067 GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS | * FAX: 314/997-2067 | ||
0979802.85IS GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 IN1RODUCTION .............................................................................................................I 1.1 Site Description ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work .......................................................................................................1 2.0 GEOPHYSICAL METI:lODOLOGY .................................................... .......................... 1 3.0 RESULTS .......................................................................................:.................................. 1 ILLUSTRATIONS Site Location and Topography .......................................................................................................1 Plan of Site and Boring Locations .................................................................................................. 2 Relative Borehole Locations ............................................................................. ............................ .3 Shear (S) Wave Velocity and Shear Modulus vs. Depth .............................................................. .4 Compressional (P) Wave Velocity, Poisson's Ratio, and Young's Modulus vs. Depth ............... 5 Summary Table - Crosshole Results .......................................................... .................................... 6 Source Boring Deviation ................................................................................................................ 7 Geophone Boring I Deviation ..................................... .................................................................. 8 Geophone Boring 2 Deviation........................................................................................................ 9 APPENDIX Limitations of Report ..................................................................................................................... A | |||
0979802.851S GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS | |||
==1.0 INTRODUCTION== | ==1.0 INTRODUCTION== | ||
1.1 Site Description. The site consists of an existing nuclear power plant near Zion, illinois. | |||
A site location map is presented on Plate 1. The crosshole borings were located approximately 900 feet soufu of fue switch yard within the plant perimeter fence, as shown on the site plan on Plate 2. | |||
1.2 Scope of Work. The scope of work included mobilizing geophysical equipment and personnel to the site, conducting a crosshole seismic test, and processing/interpreting the data. | |||
The seismic data were processed, and shear and compressional wave velocities were calculated to detennine dynamic soil properties. The seismic data were plotted and the results are presented in this report. Engineering analysis or reco=endations based on this data are outside our scope of work. | |||
2.0 GEOPHYSICAL METHODOLOGY The crosshole seismic testing method involves generating compressional (P) and shear (S) wave seismic energy at periodic depth intervals within a borehole and measuring the seismic wave travel-times at geophones situated at the source depth between two adjacent boreholes (per ASTM Standard D4428). The seismic wave arrivals at the geophones are transmitted through cables to the seismograph for digital recording. The data are interpreted by analyzing the differences in elapsed travel-time from the source to geophones. P- and S-wave velocities can be calculated for each depfu interval by analyzing the travel-time data. The distance between boreholes may vary wifu depth; fuerefore borehole deviation logging is conducted to adjust fue borehole separation distance wifu depfu for the velocity calculations. | |||
3.0 RESULTS Crosshole seismic testing was conducted using a source boring and two adjacent receiver (geophone) borings, indicated as Borings 1-20 (source), 1-20A (Geophone 1), and I-20B (Geophone 2), respectively, as shown on Plate 3. Crosshole data were recorded on 5-foot intervals throughout the depfu of fue borings. Due to a physical limitation of the crosshole equipment, data could only be collected to a depfu of 97 -feet from the surface. The borings were | |||
==Dear Mr. Darin Delaney:== | ==Dear Mr. Darin Delaney:== | ||
The above referenced project was analyzed as directed on the enclosed chain of custody record. All Quality Control criteria as outlined in the methods and current IL ELAPINELAP have been met unless otherwise noted. QAlQC documentation and raw data will remain on | |||
.. First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. First Environmental Laboratories 1600 Shore Road, Suite D Naperville, Illinois 60563 Phone: (630) 778-1200* Fax: (630) 778-1233 E-mail: firstinfo@firstenv.com !EPA Certification #100292 Project 1.0.: | The above referenced project was analyzed as directed on the enclosed chain of custody record. | ||
All Quality Control criteria as outlined in the methods and current IL ELAPINELAP have been met unless otherwise noted. QAlQC documentation and raw data will remain on fi le for future reference. Our accreditation number is 100292 and our current certificate is number 002045: | |||
effective 05/14/08 through 02/28/09 . | |||
I thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you and look forward to working with you again in the future. Should you have any questions regarding any of the enclosed analytical data or need additional information, please contact me at (630) 778-1200. | |||
g;~v Project Ma\~ger Page lof4 | |||
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shorc Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phonc (630) 778-1200 | |||
* Fax (630) 778-1233 Case NalTative TESTING SERVICE CORP. | |||
Project ID: 72070 First Environmental File JD: 8-3902 Date Received: August 27, 2008 IFtagl Descriplion IFtag I Descriplion | |||
< Anal yle not detec ted at or above the repotting limit. L+ LeS recovery olltside controllilllils; high biilS. | |||
D Ana lytc detected in associated method blank. L- LeS recovery outside control limils; low bias. | |||
C Identi fi cation confillned by GC/MS. M MS recovery outside conlrollimils; LeS acceptable. | |||
D Surrogates diluted out; recovery not availabl e. M+ MS recovery olltside conlrollimits high bias; LeS acceptable. | |||
E Estimated result; concent ration exceeds calibrJlion range. M- MS recovery olltside control limits low bias; LeS acceptable. | |||
F Field measurement. N Ana lyte is 110t pmt of a liI' NE LAC accreditation. | |||
Analyte was not detectcd using a library searc h routine; No NO calibration standard was rumlyzcd. | |||
G Surrogate recovcry outs ide control limits; matri x effect. P Chemical preselvation pH adjusted in lab. | |||
1-1 Analysis or extraction holding time exceedcd. Q 'lllCana lyte was dctennined by a GC/MS dattlbase search. | |||
Estimated result; concentration is less than calib range. S Analyte was sub-contracted to anot her laboratory for analys is. | |||
K RPD outside control limits. T Sample temperature upon receipt exceeded 0_6°C Routine Reportin g Limit (Lowest amount that can be RL detected when routine weight s/vo lulllcs are used without \V Reporting limit elevated due to sample matrix. | |||
di lution.) | |||
All quality co ntrol criter ia, as outl ined in the methods, have been met except as noted below or on the foll owing analytical report. | |||
Sample Batch Com ments: | |||
Sample acceptance criteria were met. | |||
Page 20f4 | |||
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditntion ll [00292 | |||
-"""!'~!!!== 1600 Shore Rand | |||
* Naperville, Ill inois 60563* Phone (630) 778- 1200 | |||
* Fax (630) 778-1233 Analytical Report Clicnt: TESTfNG SERV ICE CORP. Date Collected: 08/27/08 Project ID: 72 070 T illie Collected : 10:00 Salll pie ID: 1-20 S-2 Date Received: 08/27/08 Sample No: 8-3902-00 I Date Reported: 09/03/08 Analyte Result R.L. Units F lags Chloride, Soluble Method: 4500CL,C Analysis Date: 09/03/08 Chl oride, Soluble < 50 50 mg/kg Sulfate, Soluble Method: 4500S04,E Analysis Date: 09/03 /08 Su lfate, Soluble < 150 ISO mg/kg pH @25°C, 1:10 Method: 4500H+B Analysis Date: 08128/08 13:30 pH @ 25°C, I: I 0 9.26 Units Page 30f4 | |||
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP I NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shore Road | |||
* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phone (630) 778-1200 | |||
* Fax (630) 778-1233 Analytical Report Client: TESTING SERVICE CORP. Date Collected: 08/27/08 Project ID: 72070 Time Collected: 10:00 SampleID: 1-2 1 S-2 Date Received: 08/27/08 Sample No: 8-3902-002 Date Reported: 09103/08 Analyte Resnlt R.L. Units Flags Chloride, Soluble Method: 4500CL,C Analys is Date: 09103/08 Ch loride, Soluble < 50 50 mglkg Sulfate, Soluble Method: 4500S04,E Analysis Date : 09103/08 Sulfate, Soluble < 150 150 mglkg pH @ 25°C, 1:10 Method: 4500H+B Analysis Date: 08/2 8/08 13 :30 pH @ 25°C, I: 10 9.11 Units Page 4 of4 | |||
,~.. First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. | |||
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Cornp~tny Name: -~SC Pagc __ of _ _ pgs First Environmental Laboratories Streel Address: | |||
1600 Shore Road, Suite D City: State: Z ip: | |||
Naperville, Illinois 60563 Phone: Fax: e-mail: | |||
Phone: (630) 778-1200* Fax: (630) 778-1233 E-mail : firstinfo@firstenv.com Send Report T o : . . . Via: Fax 0 cornall 0 | |||
!EPA Certification #100292 Sampled By: ,I )~Y I 1/1 I hi(~1"",,'" | |||
7 Analyses Project 1.0.: 1201 0 P.O.#.: | |||
Matrix Codes: S = Soil W = Water 0 = Other DatefIime Taken Sample Description Matrix Comments Lab LD. | |||
B-] | |||
5 | |||
~0 FOR LAB USE ONLY: r f Cooler Temperature: O.1~-6gCYes_ N / I) s: 'Q C Sample Refrigerated : Yes_ No_ Containers Received Preserved: No Received within 6 hrs. of co ction: _ __ Refrigerator Temperature: _ _ _' C Ice Present: Yes_ No 5035 Vials Froze n: Yes_ No_ | |||
Freezer Temperature: _ __ ' C Notes and Special Instructions: _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ | |||
Relinquished By: | |||
Relinquished By: | |||
r j ) , .A?~ DatefJlme DatefIime Q-2.t-6:':1 <? z. ' 3 ., Received By: | |||
Received By: | |||
I - j..---- 0 r | |||
\, ../ DalefJlme Date!Time _ _ _ | |||
v { v 'I II 1_ _ ______ _ | |||
v '-" ( ~ | |||
Rc\'. -'lOIl}} | |||
Latest revision as of 06:57, 25 February 2020
| ML15188A190 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/02/2008 |
| From: | Testing Service Corp |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Sargent & Lundy |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15188A105 | List:
|
| References | |
| ZS-2015-0084 L-72, 070 | |
| Download: ML15188A190 (49) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:October 2, 2008 L - 72 ,070 REPORT OF SOILS EXPLORATION ZION SOLUTIONS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION PREPARED FOR: SARGENT & LUNDY LLC 55 EAST MONROE STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60603 PREPARED BY: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 EAST GUNDERSEN DRIVE CAROL STREAM, ILLINOIS 60188 (630) 653-3920
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. TEXT 1.0 Introdu ction ............ . ......... .......... . .. . ...... .. ... .. . .. ... 2 2.0 Field Work 2 3.0 Geophysica l Testing .. . . .. ... . . .. . .. . .. . . . .......... .. . . * .. . .... . . . 4 4.0 Laboratory Testing 4 5.0 Closure 5 II. APPEND IX
October 2, 2008 L-72,070 REPORT OF SOILS EXPLORATION ZION SOLUTIONS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Presented in this report are the results of the soils investigation performed to determine the general subsurface conditions for the proposed construction of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage facility. The proposed structure will be constructed at the Zion Nuclear Power Plant in Zion, IL. This work was performed in general accordance with Technical Specification Subsurface Investigation Specification Z-5701 prepared by Sargent and Lundy and dated July 29, 2008. 2.0 FIELD WORK A total of two(2) soil borings (1-20 and 1-21) were performed for this project with each of them being extended to a depth of 100.0 feet. Boring 1-20 was subsequently converted into a seismic cross hole survey source hole. Additionally, two (2) boreholes were drilled and completed with 3" PVC casing for cross hole seismic testing. Upon completion of the drilling and testing , ground surface elevations as well as Northing and Easting coordinates were determined for the drilling locations using a Trimble R8 GPS. The vertical and horizontal data shown on the Boring Location Plan was retrieved from a National Geodetic Survey data base located approximately 1.2 miles south of Zion, Illinois. Sargent & Lundy L - 72,070 October 2, 2008 The boreholes were initially advanced by 4 1/4" hollow stem auger methods to the ground water table and then completed by rotary wash methods using bentonite and potable water in accordance with ASTM D 5783. Upon completion, each borehole was sealed with cement-bentonite grout placed by tremie methods. Soil samples were collected at 1-20 on 2.5 foot intervals for the entire 100 foot depth. At location 1-20 the sampling interval was 2.5 feet for the first 10 feet and 5.0 feet thereafter. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) - N Values (ASTM D 1586), were determined using an automatic hammer which allows a 140 pound weight to free fall from a 30 inch drop to drive the sampler. The samples were collected using standard split spoon procedures during SPT since granular soils and/or very stiff clays prevented the use of Shelby tube samplers. Liners were not used with the split spoon samplers. Dynamic energy measurements have not been made on this automatic hammer. However, Pile Driving Analyzer's (PDA) have been used to process dynamic measurements of strain and acceleration between the drill string and similar hammers made by the same manufacturer (Boart Longyear). The Average Energy Transfer Ratio is accepted as 75% for this model hammer. The soil types were logged in the field by the drill crew and representative portions of each sample were contained in glass jars per ASTM D 4220 and brought back to our laboratory. Boring Logs defining the soil lithology and ground water observations is included in the Appendix of this report. Ground water depth was determined during hollow stem auger drilling only. The borings were completed using wet rotary methods and therefore, the water levels inside the boreholes at the completion of the drilling were not representative. PVC casing was installed shortly after the completion of the drilling and reaming at location 1-20. Boring 1-21 was sealed with grout immediately following the drilling and sampling to prevent an open hole hazard. Therefore, 24 hour water level readings were not obtained. The ground water depth measured during the hollow stem auger drilling is considered the most accurate indication of the undisturbed ground water levels at the site. Sargent & Lundy L - 72,070 October 2, 2008 3.0 GEOPHYSICAL TEST ING Geophysical testing consistin g of a Cross Hole Seismic Investigation , was performed at location 1-20 . The original bore hole (1-20) was reamed to a depth of 100 feet using a 6" tri cone roller bit and then cased with 3" PVC casing sea led in place with cement-benton ite grout. Two add itiona l holes (1-20A and 1-20B) were drilled using a 6" tri cone roller bit to a depth of 100 feet and were located in a straight line at approximate distances of 10 and 20 feet from 1-20 . These bore holes were also completed with the insta llation of 3" PVC casing sea led in place with cement-bentonite grout. The Cross Hole testing was performed by Geotechnology, In c. In general conformance with Section 4.31 of ASTM 04428. A copy of the report prepared by Geotechnology, In c. summa ri zing the test results is includ ed in the Append ix of this report. Following the testing each of the PVC cas ings were sea led with bentonite chips wh ich were hydrated upon placement. In addition the PVC was cut off near the ground surface and topsoil was place over the holes. 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING The soil samples obta in ed from the borings were exam ined in our laboratory and visual ly classified accord in g to the Unified Soi ls Class ification System (ASTM 0 2488). Cohesive soil s were measured for moisture content (ASTM 0 2216) and unconfined compressive streng th (ASTM 0 2166). Add itional testing including grain size distribution (ASTM 0422, 0 1140), Alterberg Limits (ASTM 04318), pH (ASTM G 51) and dry unit weight determinations (EM 1110-2-1906) were performed on samp les selected by Sa rgent and Lundy. The results of this testing has been summarized and incorporated into the Soi l Test data Sheets included in the Appendix. Two (2) so il samp les selected by the client were ana lyzed for soluble ch lorides (Method 4500CL,C) and solubl e sulfates (Method 4500S04, E) by First Environmenta l Laboratories. A copy of their report is Appended. Sa rgent & Lundy L - 72,070 October 2, 2008 5.0 CLOSURE The data and res ults prese nted in thi s report are based upon th e conditions encountered at the two (2) locations investigated as indicated on the Soil Boring Location Plan. Thi s report does not refl ect any variations that may occur between these locations, th e nature and extent of which may not become evident until the construction phase of the project. We are appreciative of the opportunity to assist you with thi s project and look forward to working with you in th e future. Please ca ll if you have any questions or are in need of furth er information . Res pectfully Submitted , Prepared By, . A/,.(~- MiCh;97v~ Machalinski Darin Delaney Vice !'5resident Proj ect Geolog ist Reg istered Professional Engineer Illinois No. 062-038559 APPENDIX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION CHART LEGEND FOR BORING LOGS TWO (2) BORING LOGS (6 pages) BORING LOCATION PLAN (1 page) GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT Geotechnology, Inc. (16 pages) SOIL DATA SHEETS (12 pages) TWO (2) ANALYTICAL REPORTS First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (5 pages)
TESTI NG SERV ICE CORPORATION UNIFlEO CLASS IF ICAT ION CHART CRITERIA FOR ASSIGNING GRO UP SYMBOLS AND S OI L CLASSIFICATION GROUP tlAMES US ING LABORATORY TESTS 0 GROUP GROUP NAME b HW80L GRAVELS GW 0 Mort I hon ~Oo/o CLEA N GRAVELS
~ o f CGo'U Lus Ih on 5°10 0 ,. oclion relolned fine s C Cu < 4 ond/o . I > Cc > 3 e GP Poo.lyg' oded g.o ve l f
" z
~ ~
~ 0~
~
0 0 No . 4 siev.. GR AVE LS WITH FI NES Mo.e Ilion Fines ( Ioui fy as Fines c lo ssHy os ML 0 ' Mil CL or CH f-____________~c"OOC'o~HCOC*O*-'------~----------------------------------------------_1f---_1----------------------i GM GC Si lly g. ovt'l f,O,1I Cloyey q.ovel f , q , II i,,,,~ .~ SA ND S CL EAN SANDS SW Wt'II-q'oded sond w 0 50 °/0 0' more _0 Lus I lion 5 °/0
,jnes d C u'-:'60nd/o' I > Cc!>3 e SP Poo. ly q. oded liond 1 of eoo,st' ~ , Iroclion pOISU o Fines clossj ,y as ML o. Mil SM S illy sand 0,11, '
SAN DS WITII FINES N o. 4 o sieve Mo, e Ilion 12 0/ 0 flnt's" Fines c lossi ' y as C L 0< CH SC Cloyt'y s and 0 , II, I PI:> 7 ond plo l s on or above CL L eon cl oy k ,I , m SI LT S e CLAY S "A' line j 0
~ Liquid l imil Ino.qo n;c f---------------------'-------------------------------------+----+--------------------_1 PI <: 4 a. plots bt'low .. A " lin e j ML Sill .,I,m 0
~ z
~
., leu Ilion 50 0/0 O,oonic Liquid Ii mil oven dried
"'" 0.75 OL O'oonic cloy . ,I,m,n o~ Liquid lim il - nol dried Organic si ll -, I ,m,o w *
- z **
;; :;.~
o ". P I p lats on a. obove "A' line roO cloy k ,I ,m S ILTS {} CLAYS '" zw ,0 Liquid limi l
;:;: :; A
50 0/0 a. mo . e PI p lo t li bela .. line M" Elos l ic si ll k, l ,m Or qonic liquid limil - oven droed <0 7~ O. qonic cloy * ,I ,m,P Liqu id li mil - nol dri e d . 0" O' 'J onic s ill k ,I, m,q IHOhly a.oanic soit s Prima r ily o.g onic mo tt e' ,do rk 'n colo r, and oJonic a d o. PT P t' ol
- o. Ba H d on l he molt.lol passing Ihe J-i n 17 5 - mm) Ileve. I. If Alle.berg limit s pial 11'1 hOlched area, soi l is a b . 1I fi el d sa mpl~ cOnl oil'led cobbles ond/o. bo uld ers,odd " .. ith cobbl es al'ld/o ' boul de r " CL - ML, ,i lly c l oy.
10 g.o u p nom e. c . Grove ls wi lh 5 10 12 ala f int'S re quire dual sym b ols k. 1I so il con l oins 15 10 2 9 °/0 plus No . 200,odd " .. " hsond" GW-GM 1,,11 oroded grovel .. ith sill Or "",illl 9rovt' I" .... hic h ever 'S predomin ol'l l . GW - GC .. ell oroded g r ovel .. ith cloy .... soi l conloins ?;,. 30 °10 plus No. 200 , p. e d omll'lonlly !ol'ld, GP - GM poorly (traded g r owel .. illl s .1t odd "sandy" 10 (t.oup nome . GP- GC poor ly qroded q.ovel .. illI cl oy m. 1I soi l c on'oins~JO °/oP11l5 Na . 200,p'eda rn inOl'llly Ola ve l,
- d. Sa nd s .. i l ll 5 010 10 12 °/0 fil'les *
- quire duo l s ymbol s odd o r ovr Il Y 10 oroup nom e .
SW- SM .. ell (traded sond ..ill, si lt n . PI~4 and plo l s 01'101 obovt"h" IIl'Ie . SW-SC .. t il (traded SOli d .. illI clOl SP - S M poo. ly I)rod. d sOl'ld ..ilt, s;lI o. PI~ 4 0. plo l s btto .. ':{Io':, line .
~~ ::::~ ~:I:; .~:,fl~: e ~
Sf>- SC poo " y g. od e d sand .. il lI cloy
- IIl'Ie .
C _ (030' c - ~O
" so il conla i ns ~ 15 0/0 SOll d,Odd " .. itll sand" 10 I)roup nom * .
g.1f fines clon ily os CL - ML,lIu dua l s ymbo l GC - GM,SC-SM. II. It f il'lu a rt' aJonie , odd .. itll o .gonic fines" 10 ? r OU P l'I ome . I II soi l conloil'll ? 15 °/0 orovel ,odd" .. ilh orov.I' 10 I)ro up nome .
*0 0 V / /
/
/
V V// :?
/
~.;
v' O~/
/
/ O~
0 V
/
~
H x ~J 0 / 0 V // 'v
/
V MH OR 0 V / / O~ 0
/
//
V
/ ML 0 OL r --;;; L - ML )!:; '///,Y oV 0 ,o '0 JO .0 '0 .0 10 80 90 '00 L10UID LIM IT ( LLl
TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION LEGEND FOR BORING LOG S
~ <
FILL TOPSOIL PEAT GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY DOLOMITE SAMPLE TYPE: SS Split Spoon ST Thin:Walied Tube A = Auger FIELD AND LABORATORY TEST DATA: N = Sta ndard Penetration Resistance in Blows per Foot Wc In-S itu Water Content Qu Unconfined Compressi ve Strength in Tons per Sq uare Foo t
- Pocket Penetrometer M eas urem ent; Maximum Re ad ing = 4.5 t sf yD Dry Unit Weight in Pounds per Cubic Foot WATER LEVELS :
V While Drilling
\l End of Boring
... 24 Hours SOIL DESCRIPTION :
MATER IAL PARTICLE SIZE RANGE BOULDER Over 12 inches COBBLE 12 inches to 3 inch es Coarse GRAVEL 3 inches to '/. inch Sma ll GRAVEL '/. inch to No.4 Sieve Coarse SAND No.4 Sieve to No . 10 Sieve Medium SAN D No. 10 Sieve to No . 40 Sie ve Fine SA ND No. 40 Sieve to No. 200 Sieve SILT and CLAY Passing No . 200 Sieve COHESIVE SOILS COHESIONLESS SO ILS CONSISTENCY Qu RELATIVE DENS ITY _ N_ Very Soft Less than 0 .3 Very Loose 0-4 Soft 0.3 to 0.6 Loose 4 - 10 Stiff 0.6 to 1.0 Firm 10 - 30 Tough 1 .0 to 2. 0 Dense 30 - 50 Very Tough 2.0 to 4.0 Very Dense 50 and over Hard 4.0 and over MODIFYING TERM PERCENT BY WEIGHT Trace 1 - 10 linle 10 - 20 Some 20 - 35
PROJECT ISFSI Z ion Nuc lear Power Plant CLIENT Sargent & Lundy, LLC BORING 1-20
'-="'--- - - DATE ST ARTED _-,8,-...:.: 1 2=---~08
,,-_ DATE COMPLETED _-'8.....1 .:..4.:...."'
0.:.. 8_ JOB L .. 72,070 ELEVATIONS WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS GROU ND SURFACE_-,5~8~ 7~ . 2~_ _ __ V WHI LE DRILLING 3.5 ' END OF BORING _..::4~8~7~ .2~_ _ __ \l AT END OF BORING _ _ ---'M "'u
- .d::..:..
R:::o..:: ta:..:r,L y -'W
"'a
- s:..:h-'-_ _
... 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) zu SAMPLE (90 N WC au YDRY DEPTH ELEV. SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
~~ NO. TYPE o
- >, Firm brown and gray fine to medium SAND ,
- ' ~ IX 1 SS 5* tra ce gravel , damp (SP) 11
- 13
.. 3.0 584.2 v Loose brown and gray fin e to medium SAND ,
- > <Ixi 2 SS 2*
trace gravel , sa turated (SP) 5 -~ 2*4 5.5 581.7 \ S-2: % Graval = 8 X* 3 SS 2* 1-1
% Sand = 86 oj" Silt and C la~ - 6 /
Loose dark gray fine to medium SAND , trace
.. grave l, sa turated (SP) 10 - ~
X* 4 SS 1* 2*3 10.5 576.7 xl 5 SS 8* 10-1 2 Firm gray fin e to medium SAND , trace gravel,
.... . . saturated (SP) "'"' - ... ~I 6 SS 7* "'z 15 - : ....
8-10 15.5 571 .7 H - ," , ' , S-7: % Gravel = 5
"'~ - ' ... . Ix l 7 SS 9*
23*22
% Sand = 91
% Silt and Clay = 4
"'is - '
Ul 0 20
*x. 8 SS 10*
17-19
.. Dense gray fin e to medium SAND, trace gravel, III U
- . xl 9 SS 13*
14*21 saturated (SP)
....Ul~
23.0 564.2 H Cl 25 - ' xl 10 SS 14* 30*29 25.5 56 1.7 Dense gray fin e SAND , trace silt, sa turated (SP-SM) tl 11 SS 8-5*5 26.6 28.0 559.2 Firm gray sandy S ILT, sa turated (Ml) S- 12: (ll, Pl , PI) 22,11 , 11 30 -
~
~ ~I 12 SS 8-10*11 11.0 4.5+' 129.9 % Gravel = 3
% Sand = 24
% Silt = 52
~ % Clay = 21
~ ~I 13 SS 8*
9* 13 11.2 6.73 128.4
~
35 -
~
~
xl 14 SS 7* 7*10 20.5 4.73 108.5 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY , some sand , trace gravel , moist (Cl)
~
~ xl 15 SS 10*
14-15 12.8 6.90 125.2 38.0 549.2 ~ IX. Q
- 31* Ve ry dense gray clayey SilT , very moist (Ml) o 16 SS 5015" 14.8 120.4
~ 40 .. DIVISion lines beh .ccn depoSits represent dppro-:irnale boundClli(!s Ilel::een sOlllWes ~ DRILL RIG NO. 315 IIl-S!Il1. the transition may ba grmJlI<l1 Page 1 of 3
PROJECT ISFSI Z ion Nuc lea r Pow0'... r.'.P.. la..n...t _ __ CLIENT Sargent & Lund y, LLC BORING .'. 1-.=2 c::. 0 _ __ DATE STARTED _--,8'...-.:.: 12::.-", 08:::....._ DATE COMPLETED _ -,8'..-1.'.4.'.-.:: 08 , ,-_ JOB L -72, 07D ELEVATIONS WATE R LEVEL OBS ERVATION S GROUND SURFACE _-'5,,8.. 7..
.2=--_ _ __ V W HILE DRILLIN G 3.5 '
END OF BORING _..::4,,8.. 7..
,2=--_ _ __ \l AT END OF BORING _ _---'M ..u "d"-'-'
R"'o" ta:::r.I.y--'W=as "h~_ _
" 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed)
" 0 SAMPLE zu N WC Qu YDRY DEPTH ELEV. SOIL DESCR IPTIONS
~~ NO. TYPE 40
- 40. 5 546.7
~ -I
~
- 17 SS 11 - 9.6 10.7 1 133.8 14-14
~
~ I 18 SS 10- 10.6 5.90 131.0 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, littl e sand ,
45 - ~ 10-11 trace gravel, moist (Cl)
~
~ xl 19 SS 11 -
13-13 10.5 9.38 131.3
~
~ xl 20 SS 8- 12.9 5.12 124.4 50 - ~ 12-15
~
~ xl 21 SS 9-10-13 13.8 5.06 122 .7 f-<
~ =
S-22: (ll, Pl , PI) 31 , 12, 19
u."" -
~ xl 22 SS 8- 13.4 5.32 123.7 % Gravel 1 =
z 55 - ~ 12-14 % Sand 15
=
% Silt 50
=
H -
~ = '~"
u. g;
~
~
61 23 SS 12-16-17 13.4 6.23 123.7
% Clay 34 UJ - ~ 12- 118.3 0 60 - ~ ZI 24 SS 15-15 15.7 5. 12 '"'"' - ~
00
- ~
C>I 25 SS 10- 20.3 4.07 108.8
'" 11 -13
~ -
~
~
f-< H UJ 65 -
~
xl 26 SS 8-9-11
- 20. 1 3.93 106.9
;;; 127 SS 8-8-8 13.8 4.53 11 7.7 68.0 519 .2
;;; 28 SS 10* 17.4 3.01 114 .6 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, 70 - ;;; 1 50/6" trace gravel, occasional Cobbles, moist (Cl)
;;;/ 29 SS -- Boulder Zone 69.5 to 72 .5' 72.5 514.7
§o - 75 -
;;; X 30 SS 25-34-42 7.6 14 .57 113.8 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand ,
;;; trace gravel, occasional silt seams, moist (Cl )
;;;/
1 31 SS 21-31-36
- 11. 1 4.5*..
- 129.6 78.0 509.2 Very dense gray clayey SilT, lillie sancl , moi st u
80 IX 1 32 SS 37* 50/5" 10.7 130.7
- DIVISion hnes bct'.-.een del}QSlls represen t appfO"unatc buumt[lries beh'.een soil lypes (Cl-Ml) i" D I~I LL RIG NO. 315 in*Sllu tile transition may be gradual Page 2 of 3
PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant CLI ENT Sargent & Lund
- LLC BORING ;..
1-.2
=,-=
0 _ __ DATE STARTED _ __8'--
-1
.:.:2:...-0
- 8'----_ DATE COMPL ETED _ -,8,---1;..4;..-",
0",8_ JOB L-72,070 ELEVATI ONS WATER LEVEL OB SERVATIONS GROUND SURFACE ___5::8:.:. 7.:.:
.2=--_ _ __ V WHILE DRILLING 3.5 '
END OF BORING 487.2 'V AT END OF BORING _ _----'M ",u R::o:.:.ta::.:r.!.y__W=as...h~___
- d"-'.:
>< ... 24 HOURS (PVC Pipe Installed) to x~,---,-._-,--,-,,-._-._----------------~
0 SAMPLE Z U f-.'-'':=--j N WC Qu YDRY DEPTH ELEV. SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
~ ~ NO. TYPE 80-,rrnTT~_4_~I-~--~-~_+--~--~--~~_ ~~~ (L~-n~,~'
,P~I)r--~1~1*,~lrrU,,~I----------~
"Xl 33 SS 43- 12.0 127.3
% Gravel =
% Sand = 27
° 50/4" % Silt and Clay = 73 Xl 34 SS 44- 12.1 85 - 50/4" y~r~rJ(~ se gray clayey SILT, little sand , moist 13.2 86.0 501 .2
/'11 ~ SS 9-8-9 15.1 2.55 119.7 87.0 500.2 Firm gray cl ayey SAND, saturated (SC)
- XI 36 SS 7- 18.0 3.21 90 - 8-11 16.0 2.48 Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little
= Xl ~
SS 8-12-13 16.2 4.0' sand, occasional silt seams, moist (CL-ML)
- IXI 38 SS 8- 17.3 3.0' 12-13 95 - '"
Dense gray fin e to medium SAND , saturated
-*:<1'11 ~ SS 26-27-15
- 12. 1 13.9 2.0 (SP)
- Very tough gray very silty CLAY, little sand ,
SS 2~~;8 11.9 2.0' occasional silt seams, moist (CL-ML) 5 100 _---l'l..l.JL4'I-X-'1 40
~ -+--~~-~-_4-_4--~-+-----------------~ ~l w - End of Boring at 100.0' In W -
- Approximate unconfined compressive
~
[-0
- strength based on measurements with a calibrated pocket penetrometer.
(J)
'4 Cl 105 -
- Diedrich D-120 Truck Rig (#315)
CME Autom ati c Hammer 110-11 5 --
~
"BR I 20--L--~-L-L--~-~~~~~~~~~==~._~---------------------
,_ DIVISion hnes between deposits repre sent ~ DRI LL RIG NO. 315 <'lpprOXnllale boundaries bel\'.'een salt types Page 3 of 3 ~ in-sllu, the transition ma~' be gradual
PROJ ECT ISFS I Z ion Nuclear Power P l an~ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ CLIENT Sa rg ent & Lundy, LLC BORING 1 ' - --
.:...::' - DAT E START E D _ -'8'--".::
18::.":0
°8"---_ DATE CO MPLET ED 8"18"08 JOB L"72,070 ELEVATIONS WATER LEVE L OB SE RVATI ONS GROUND SUR FACE _ --'5,,8,,7.:.:
.1'---_ _ __ V WH ILE DRILLING 5,5 '
END OF BORING _ -=4,,8,,7.:.:
,1'---_ _ __ \l AT END OF BORING _ _ _--'-R"'oc:ta .:::r"y_W
' '-'-=
a-=- sh"---_ _ _ l' 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion E-<
'-' 0 z u SAMPLE N WC Qu YDRY DEPTH ELEV. SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
~~ NO , TYPE o
-~ IX h Firm brown and gray clayey SAND and
-~
1 SS 6- GRAVEL, damp (SC-GC)
- ... 8-9 3.0 584.1 Firm brown and gray SAND , trace gravel, damp
- ,> IX 2 SS 4- (SP) 7-10 5' - ~ f-'
5.5 581.6 \ S -2: % Gravel = 1 xl 3 SS 4-5-9
% Sand 95=
% Silt and Clav ~ 4 I 10,-
~ .". XII 4 SS 10-13-1 5
-: ,' .. S-5: % Gravel 24 =
..", . % Sand 72=
E-< % Silt and Clay =4 15, - X_ 5 SS 8-13-14 Z Firm gray SAND, some gravel, occasional H - '
- . Cobbles, saturated (SP)
'~" -
"- - :~
!3 Ul -,
'IX. 6 SS 11-3" 20 - ' 13-13
"" 22.0 565.1
~
~,
Ul H X. 7 SS 10- Firm gray SAND, sa turated (SP)
'" 25 -
15-12 27.0 560.1 X Firm gray silty fine to medium SAND, sa turated "0' 8 SS 6-30 - 8-11 (SM) 32.0 555. 1
=
S-9: (LL , PL, PI) 28, 14, 14
~ % Gravel 1 =
% Sand 8 =
~ xl 9 SS 16- 12.7 5.41 122.7 =
% Silt 59
~ 35 - ~ 16-21 % Clay 32= ~ -
~ Very tou gh to hard gray sil ty CLAY, trace sand ,
~, i;l
~ trace gravel, moist (CL)
, 38.0 549. 1 Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little
~II
~
--i 36- sand , trace gravel. occasional silt searns , damp
~ 10 SS 50/4" 12.2 4. 5 +' ICL-IVILl _ --' ~ 40 ,. DIVISion lines bel'.. een depoSits repre sent appro)[unate boundaries beh°.'een S!)II I}PCS. ~ DR ILL RIG NO. 315 in-sllll, the tranSIti on may be gradual r age 1 of 3
PRO,IECT ISFS I Z io n Nucl ea r Power Plant CLIENT Sarg ent & Lundy, LLC BORING ,- 1-=2 -,- 1_ _ _ DATE STARTED _ -,8,--1
.:.:8,--",
08,,--_ DATE COMPLETED 8-18-08 JOB L-72,070 ELEVAT IONS WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS GROU ND SURFACE ___5.,.8.:. 7'-'
,1_____ _ V W HILE DR ILLIN G 5,5 '
EN D OF BORI NG _--=4:::8,,7.:.,1'--_ _ __ '\! AT END OF BORING _ __ --cR~o~ta
~rC1y~W
= a:osh
... 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion Co "0
zu SAMPLE N WC Qu YDRY DEPTH ELEV, SOIL DESCRIPTIONS
~~ NO. TYPE 40 very tougn to hard gray very silty GLAY, lillie
- sa nd , trace gravel, occasional silt seams, damp (CL-Ml) 42,0 545.1
- V S- 11 : (ll, Pl, PI) = 23, 12, 11 45 -
xl 11 SS 16-22-25 13,0 4.0' 124.7 % Gravel = 5
% Sand = 20
% Silt = 51
% Clay =24 50 -
Xl 12 SS 15-31-34 9.7 9.22 133.5 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl) 52,0 535.1 Co IX~ OJ OJ 13 SS 26- 9,9 3.5' Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little
'z" 55 50/3" sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl)
H - OJ
!3'"
58,0 529,1 IX.
- ~
(f) -~ 14 SS 17-29 60 - ~
°..,'"
5011"
~ ..
W
- :~ 'W" - ;~
u .. ~. Dense to very dense gray SAND and GRAVEL,
- i! - ~ occasional Cobbles and Boulders, sa turated (SP-GP)
Co
-~
(f) IX* 15 ss 27-H ~: 0 65 -::-~.: 24-24
- ~:
- ~ ::
- ~:
68.0 519.1 70 - IX " 16 SS 14-17-20 14,5 7,73 121.1 Very tough to hard gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel, moist (Cl)
/:
~ 75 - xl 17 SS 14-17-23 15.7 2,5' 118,3 S- 17: (l l , Pl, PI) =25 , 12, 13
% Gravel =3 o - % Sand = 19
"~I % Sil t = 51
- ??
U % Clay = 27
~
80
-rt1 __lxl
......J..1LI 18 5S 16-16*18 13,3 6.23 124.0 01'/' 510n hnes bel,.. cen depoSits represen t approxllna!C bOllildarics bel\".ecn sOll lypes.
DR ILL RIG NO, 315 In-situ. tile tranSition ma~/ be gradual Page 2 of 3
PROJECT ISFS I Z ion Nuclear Power Plant CLIENT BORI NG Sargent & L undy, LLC 1--=2:..:1'-----_ __ DATE STARTED _-,8:.-.:.: 18 :.-.:: 0:.8_ DATE COMPLETED _-,8:.-.:.:18: .-..::: 0.:: 8_ JOB Ii &--131 L-72,070 ELEVATION S WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS GROUNDSURFACE _-,5~8~7-,- .I,-----_ _ __ V WHILE DRILLING 5.5 ' END OF BORING _--=4..8~7-,-.1,-----_ _ __ \l AT END OF BORING _ _ _---'R "'o"'t.::a:J ry'--W=a":'s"h_ __ T 24 HOURS Grouted Upon Completion 00 SAMPLE zu YDRY DEPTH ELEV.
..,'" ~ NO. TYPE N WC Qu SOIL DESCRIPTIONS 80 Ve ry tOUgll to Ilard gray silty C LAY, liltle sand ,
- trace gravel, moist (Cl)
- IX_ 19 SS 10- 13.4 4.5+"
85 - 18-21 87.0 500. 1 90 - IX 20 SS 11-22-26 17.5 3.5'
,... - Very tough to hard gray very silty CLAY, little
- sand, occasional silt seams, moist (Cl-Ml)
u."" 95 -
!X 21 SS 15-20-25 13.2 4.5+*
z H - i;! u.
!3 Ul 3
0 100 10122 SS 20-29-37 10.3 4.5+"
- End of Boring at 100 .0' U '" ~ -
Approx imate unconfined compressive streng th based on measurements with a c' - ca librated pocket penetrometer. Ul H Cl 105 -
- Diedrich 0 - 120 Truck Rig (#315)
CME Automatic Hammer 11 0 - 115 - 120 D,VISion lines bell.cen
" deposits represen t approxllnatc boumlMlcs beh':een 5011 types.
00 ~ DRILL RIG NO. 315 in-situ. the IranSI\lon may be gractl1at Page 3 of 3
EXYWIT Z5701-1 BORING LOCATION PLA~ i~ ZION .NUCLEARPo\¥ER PLANT ISFSI SITE #1 * . ~.
~
N
~
~
DRAWN BY: TRP Boring I ~ TESTING SERVICE CORPORA nON CHECKED BY: 1-20 587.2
'1~
(L .m J 457 EAST GUNDERSEN DRIVE CAROL STREAM, ILLINOIS 60188 JOB NO.: L- 72,070 1 OF 1 1-21 587.1 DATE: October 2008
GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ZION, ILLINOIS Preparedfor: TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION Carol Stream, illinois Prepared by: GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. St. Louis, Missouri Geotechnology, Inc. Report No. 0979802.851S September 15,2008 ProjectslDeliverables1979802_ crosshole.doc
GEO! ECHNOlOGY, INC. ENGIN EERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SAINT LOUIS* COLLINSVILLE' KANSAS CITY September 15,2007 0979802.85IS Mr. Darin Delaney Testing Service Corporation 457 East Gundersen Drive Carol Stream, lllinois 60188
Reference:
Geophysical Data Report Crosshole Seismic Results Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, llIinois
Dear Mr. Delaney:
Presented herein are the results of the crosshole seismic test for the referenced site. This work was conducted in general accordance with proposal P14676.00.85IS dated July 31, 2008. Presented in this report is a description of the geophysical method and data plots. It is a pleasure to be of service to you on this project If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at (314) 997-7440. Very truly yours,
~J?l~
GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. Glen 1. Adams Dougl . Lambert, P.G. Senior Geophysicist Senior Project Manager-Geophysics GLAlDWL:gla/sjc Copies Submitted: (3) @prifllf1don recyded paper 11816LACKLAND ROAD. SUITE 150' SAINT LOUIS. MISSOURI 63146
- 314/997-7440
- FAX: 314/997-2067
0979802.85IS GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 IN1RODUCTION .............................................................................................................I 1.1 Site Description ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work .......................................................................................................1 2.0 GEOPHYSICAL METI:lODOLOGY .................................................... .......................... 1 3.0 RESULTS .......................................................................................:.................................. 1 ILLUSTRATIONS Site Location and Topography .......................................................................................................1 Plan of Site and Boring Locations .................................................................................................. 2 Relative Borehole Locations ............................................................................. ............................ .3 Shear (S) Wave Velocity and Shear Modulus vs. Depth .............................................................. .4 Compressional (P) Wave Velocity, Poisson's Ratio, and Young's Modulus vs. Depth ............... 5 Summary Table - Crosshole Results .......................................................... .................................... 6 Source Boring Deviation ................................................................................................................ 7 Geophone Boring I Deviation ..................................... .................................................................. 8 Geophone Boring 2 Deviation........................................................................................................ 9 APPENDIX Limitations of Report ..................................................................................................................... A
0979802.851S GEOPHYSICAL DATA REPORT CROSSHOLE SEISMIC RESULTS ZION POWER STATION ZION, ILLINOIS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Site Description. The site consists of an existing nuclear power plant near Zion, illinois. A site location map is presented on Plate 1. The crosshole borings were located approximately 900 feet soufu of fue switch yard within the plant perimeter fence, as shown on the site plan on Plate 2. 1.2 Scope of Work. The scope of work included mobilizing geophysical equipment and personnel to the site, conducting a crosshole seismic test, and processing/interpreting the data. The seismic data were processed, and shear and compressional wave velocities were calculated to detennine dynamic soil properties. The seismic data were plotted and the results are presented in this report. Engineering analysis or reco=endations based on this data are outside our scope of work. 2.0 GEOPHYSICAL METHODOLOGY The crosshole seismic testing method involves generating compressional (P) and shear (S) wave seismic energy at periodic depth intervals within a borehole and measuring the seismic wave travel-times at geophones situated at the source depth between two adjacent boreholes (per ASTM Standard D4428). The seismic wave arrivals at the geophones are transmitted through cables to the seismograph for digital recording. The data are interpreted by analyzing the differences in elapsed travel-time from the source to geophones. P- and S-wave velocities can be calculated for each depfu interval by analyzing the travel-time data. The distance between boreholes may vary wifu depth; fuerefore borehole deviation logging is conducted to adjust fue borehole separation distance wifu depfu for the velocity calculations. 3.0 RESULTS Crosshole seismic testing was conducted using a source boring and two adjacent receiver (geophone) borings, indicated as Borings 1-20 (source), 1-20A (Geophone 1), and I-20B (Geophone 2), respectively, as shown on Plate 3. Crosshole data were recorded on 5-foot intervals throughout the depfu of fue borings. Due to a physical limitation of the crosshole equipment, data could only be collected to a depfu of 97 -feet from the surface. The borings were cased to
========================c-!! Testing Service Corporation 0979802.851S September 15, 2008 Page 2 approximately 99-feet and the downhole equipment requires approximately 2-feet from the bottom of the casing to collect data. Seismic velocities calculated between the source boring and the two geophone borings are presented on Plates 4 and 5. A table of all tabulated values and velocities is presented on Plate 6. Plates 7 through 9 are plots of the deviation from vertical for the three borings used for the crosshole test. Due to the inherent noise in the earth, and lateral variations in soil velocities between the test borings, some variations in velocities were calculated between the two receiver holes. An average velocity is plotted on the crosshole data plots that allows a smoother fit to the data. Densities used for the moduli calculations were based on lab values provided by the client as wet uoit weights. @ Ill/nrad (In I,cycled paper
=================== GOCmOCHN~ ~=================
NOTES Plan adapted from a 7.5 minute U.S.G.S. map for Zion, illinois Quadrangle, last revised In 1993. INC. ENGINEERING NlD ENVIRONfwENTAlSERVICES ST. LOUIS
- COUlNSV1lJ.E* KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois 1 PLATE 1
I
/ ,..
I
/ t '
V 0ROSSH~ETESTBO~GS
- 1.:20 (SOURpe)
- I*~A (GEQPH9NJ:! 1}
1-208 (GEOPHONE Z) o NOTES 300 600
~--
- 1. Plan adapted from an aerial photograph !
courtesy of Google Earth. SCALE IN FEET LEGEND
- Boring Location PLATE 2
10 8 6 4 2 1_ - - - - - - - 19.9811- - - - - - -** 10.5 II 9.48ft 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 SOURCE GEOPHONE1 GEOPHONE 2
*2 -4 .fl.
- 10 ----------
INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAl.. SERVICES ST. LOUIS* COLlJNSVIUE. ~SAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion. Illinois PLATE 3
Shear Wave Velocity (!psi Shear Modulus (Ksil . 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 Soil 0 20 40 60 80 DescripUoo 0.0 0.0 5.0 10.0
---,.1>>-
- - -~ --
~' ----:----+----:----i----
.. +tJ" -:--* ---:-----i----
5.0 10.0 __-----~------ ~-- - - - --T - - -----
- - -- -+-:----- - -l- ------ +--- -- --
15.0 --- ~ --
- t*3-C'-:---- : ----~---~---- Sand 15.0 ----- ~~ ------ ~ ------- + -- -----
20.0 --- ~-- -- t .a- , *---t --- -~ --- ~- ---
--- .... __ __ . __ 4- ____ I- ___ ___ _
20.0 ----- ~~------~-------~------- 25.0 ------ ~ ------~-------~-------
+_ ~ :- ~
25.0 I 1 I I I I 30.0 ---~- -- - ~- -- ~-- ~ ---~- -~---- 30.0 , , ,
- - ---- - - -- -- -4 " - - - - - +- ------
35.0 ---~----~--- -:-. -.{ -- --~---~---- 35.0 ------4--- -.--~-------T------- _ 40.0 --- -: ---- ~ ----:-- -- ~ - ~ .... --- -l-- -- _ 40.0 - - -- -- -:- ---- - -~ - -.. - - - i - - ----- 5. J: 450
* --- ~ -- -- +-- --:----+- - at- --- ~-- -- S 450
.c . -- -----[--------{-- --- -. +- ------
is.. SO.O ---~----t---7--- ~ * - ~ --- ~ ---- 15. so.o --- --- -:--- -- - - l--- +- --+- ------ a 55.0 ---~----t - -- ~--- I ~~ -~- -- ~ ---- SiR Clay ~ 55.0 ------~-------~ ~ - -- --+------- 60.0 --- .... ---- + --- .-.~ -- ... t---- ... ---- SO.O -------:----- .. ~- ----- ------ 65.0 I I I
---~----T---~-- .~ ----~---~----
I I I 65.0 -_____ ,___
~
----~- - ----- 4 ----- - -
70.0 ----:----~----~-- il ----~---~---- 70.0 ------~----- ~ ~-------+------- 75.0 --- ,-- -- {- ----:----{-.o-:-- --,- --- 75.0 -------:----- - - ~ - -.-- - -~ - ------ 80.0 -- -~ ---- + ----:---- . --. ~ -- _t - 80.0 ------~-------~-------+- ~ ---- 85.0 ---~----t---~----{ tt - - ~ ~ -~---- 85.0 -------~-- ---- ~ - ~ ---- + ------- 90.0 -- -~--- ---:- - --~--- - ~- - -~ -- -- 90.0 -- - - ---:-- --- + l-- -- --- +------- 95.0 - - - ~ - -- -+ - - - - - -- it '"" - - - --- 95.0 ------ - !- -------! $ -----+- --- --- I . VS (S-Gl) . VS(S-G2) DVS e AVERAGEVS I INC. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAl.. SBMCES ST. LOUIS* COWNsvtL1.E* KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois
Posslon's Ratio and COMPRESSION (P) Waw Velocity (fps) Young's Modulus (193 ksl) Soil 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 Descr1ption 0.0 I I 0.0 +1- - I - - ! - - - + - - - : -"1 5.0 ---- , ----- ,- -----r -----T----- I I I I 5.0 ----r--- --+- -- - -+\ -- - - - -:- - - -- 10.0 - 4i- ef ----- ~I ------ :_ ---- -t-- - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ L.. ___ __ .L ____ _ 10.0 -.:=- - - r-----+-----~ -----.. -- -- 15.0 _ .~ . ~ .L -- - -_ Sand 15.0 - ~ -- t- ---- -:- -----~---- _.: - -- - - 20.0 I I
- + -----4------~----- + -----
I I I I I I 20.0 __:1 __ L._ -- - - I
+ - - - -- -I I I
-+ __ - _1_ - - - -
I 25.0 -- ~,. -.,. - - ---.,- -- - - - r- - -- - - 1" - - - - - 25.0 --=--~----- T ---- ~----- ~ ---- - 30.0 ----C . ---- ~ ------ :_- ---- ~-- --- 30.0 ----- t- --- ~ ----- ~ -----~----- 35.0 1-&:' --. -- - - -:-- - - --+----- g 35.0 ----~} ---- -+- -- - ~ --~- - --- _ 40.0 ----- + * ---~ - --- ....et - ---- t ----- ,5 40.0 -----f -~--- + ----- ~ -- ~ -~- ---- S ~ 450.
~ ~ ______ L.. ~ ---.L- - ---
! 45.0 ----- } -- ~ -t- ---- ~ -----~- ~ --
-----1' . -- - _____ L. _= ___ + _____ -I ___
I J I I ii 50.0 ----- ..I -- +- -D- -- -- -~-
-I " ---
~ -I-----
---- ~- ---- CD 50.0 2l 55.0 I I I
- ~.-,.. - -r- - - - - -1" - - - - - :g 55.0 - - -- -
1
~ C- - --
I I T - - - - - - - - - I 60.0 --- - -~- - - . ~ ID --- - :----- - ~ ----- Silt Clay
~ 60.0 - ----~---- -i-----~-----~ ~ ---
65.0 -----1 ----3 -:---. -:- ----- i- ----- m 65.0 } ----- + ----- ~ ----- ~ ~ --- 70.0 -----{ - -- ~ -- +- -- ~ -----T----- 70.0 -- -- ~ - - - - - t - --- - -t -- - - -*,- - - - - 75.0 ----- ~-- - -c: * -----~-----t----- 75.0 --- --~ -':I -- - -:- ----- ~ -- .... - ~ ---- - 80.0 --- -- ofo-- - -- -{- -- - - -.. .:1 - - -+ +- -- -- 60:0 ----- i --- - Ct ----- ~ ----- ~ .... --- 85.0 ~ ---- ~ ----- ~ - ~-- ~ ---- 85.0 -- - -- t- i:'! - - - + - --- - ~ -- - - -+----- 90.0 - - --- + -----~ ... --:H~------ l.. -- --- I I I I 90.0 -----I:::--- --T --- --'- - ---.,-- +-- 95.0 _____ l _____ J __ ____ L _____ L 95.0 . -- -- - I ~..::.=j . Poisson's Ratio I [ . VP(S-G1) - . W(5-G2) ow . AVERAGE W I
- YClUng's Modulus INC.
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONM:NTALSERVICES sr. LoutS* COlUNSVlUE* KANSAS arv Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois
DEPfH (FT) SHEAR VELOCITY P-WAVE VELOCITY UNIT WE IGHT SHEAR MODULUS POISSON RATIO YOUNG'S MODULUS (AVERAGE. FTfSEC) (AVERAGE FT/SEC) (LBICU FT) (KSI) (KS I) 5 455 836 128 575 029 1483 10 752 1865 128 1573 040 44.13 15 802 1890 128 1788 039 497 1 20 807 1590 128 1798 033 4771 25 866 1609 128 20.84 030 54.01 30 1246 2030 130 43.81 020 104.91 35 1159 2379 109 31 .75 034 85.38 40 1371 2921 120 4895 036 13302 45 1420 4263 131 5736 044 164.92 50 1371 2970 124 5059 036 138.06 55 1272 3360 124 43.52 0.42 123.29 60 1184 3230 118 3590 042 102.12 65 1066 2839 107 26.39 0.42 74.85 70 1181 2806 115 3476 039 9686 75 1390 2890 114 4776 035 12896 80 1528 4208 131 66.37 0.42 169.04 85 1302 3073 127 46.70 0.39 129.88 90 1193 3963 115 35.54 045 10306 95 1304 5448 115 4246 047 124 81 97 1279 5200 122 43.34 047 12723 Drawn By: SLC Ck'dBy: eM App"i1lBy~ Dais; 011-15-08 Dais; 1Iisio 8 DaIs;l1~
.GEOTECHNOLOGY'NC.
ENGINEERING AND ENVJRONMENTAL SERVICES ST. LOUIS . COWNSVIU.E . KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, Illinois
SUMMARY
TABLE
- CROSSHOLE RESULTS
~~9~~2.~:' I PLATE 6
- n nn e-
-1~0 Cl
~ .t 0 *~ . O -:: .0 *2 0 10 20 30 40 50 z n _n OV
~~
Eastlng (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck"d By: Ct.t App'vd ..../g."
~l.~ Date: rlm'R Date: ~.c7"'l
-'~GIN~2LAL~ ST. LOUIS . COUJNSVILlE* KANSAS CITY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois ctnI ID""
..... n ,
Ilun PrCjOCX N ~ PLATE 7
~~
t, ~
~
~
..... * ~ II:
~ ~~
. I
- E 1:: - .0 -4 .0 -3 0 -:; 0 -1 .0 0 10 20 30 40 50 0
Z
- n
~n "n
*'"~
~n Easting (ft)
Drawn By: SLC Ck'dBy: 6'U App'Vd
~l.~ D~ Date:'}1dO;>
- . ~GINes:u~G sr.
AND ENVlRON"""'AL~ LOUIS* COWNSVIUE* KANSASQTY Zion Nuclear Power Plant Zion, illinois
---.j ::.::;;_ ......
,IIUN
~_N= PLATE 8
An
'In
~
~ n
-.e iE' CD
~ =
1::: -~ 0 -4 0 -~ .0 -;; .0 -1 0 00 10 20 30 40 50 0 z
- ~ .~
In A "
Eastlng (ft) Drawn By: SLC Ck'd By:(,'Z-? . App'vd~ Date: I Date: "II< !"" 'V ~?
~I I I ... ",. IT INC.
ENGiNEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ST. LOUIS. COWNSVILLE* KA.NSAS arv Zion Nuclear PoWer Plant Zion, illinois
~
2 ..~ n, ,llun PLATE 9
APPENDIX A LIMITATIONS OF REPORT
GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES LIMITATIONS OF REPORT
- 1. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the owner, architect, and engineer for evaluating the project as it relates to the technical aspects discussed herein. It can be made available to prospective contractors for information on factual data only and not as a warranty of subsurface conditions included in this report. Unless other contractual agreements were made, the services described in this report were carried out in accordance with the Terms for Geotechnology's Services which were attached to the proposal.
- 2. Geotechnology endeavored to perform the crosshole seismic geophysical survey in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. The findings and conclusions stated herein must be considered not as scientific certainties, but rather as professional opinions concerning the significance of the limited data gathered during the course of the survey. No warranty, express or implied, is made.
- 3. The geophysical analyses and conclusions contained in this report are based on the site conditions, project layout, sampling interval, geophysical data, and interpretive procedures described herein. Geotechnology can make no interpretation of underground conditions beyond the test location. Geophysical exploration methods are indirect and potentially influenced by a variety of natural or man-made conditions. The resulting interpretations are based on the quality of the recorded data as limited by site conditions Revised 03/09/04 Stdparl9798crosshole.doc
TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION 457 East Gundersen Drive Carol Stream, 111inois TSC Job No. L - 72,070 September 9, 2008 CLI ENT: Sargent & Lundy, LLC 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, IL PROJECT: ISFSI Project Zion Nuclear power Plant Zion, IL SOIL TEST DATA LOCATION BOR ING NUMBER 1-20 1-20 1-20 1-20 1-20 SAMP LE NUMBER 2 7 12 22 32 DEPTH IN FEET 3.5 - 5.0 16.0 - 17.5 2B.5 - 30.0 53.5 - 55.0 7B.5 - BO.O HRB CLASS IFICATION & GROUP INDEX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION SP SP CL CL CL GRAIN SIZE CLASSIFICATION GRADATION - PASS ING 1" SIEVE % GRADATION - PASS ING 3/4" SIEVE % 100 100 100 100 GRADATION - PASSING 3/B" SIEVE % 95 99 99 99 GRADATION - PASSING # 4 SIEVE % 92 95 97 99 GRADATION - PASSING # 10 SIEVE % BB 91 95 97 100 GRADATION - PASSING # 40 SIEVE % 79 71 B5 92 9B GRADATION - PASSING # 100 SIEVE % 14 B 77 BB BB GRADATION - PASS ING # 200 SIEVE % 6 4 73 B4 73 SAND AND GRAVEL % 94 96 27 16 27 SILT OR SILT AND CLAY COMB INED % 6 4 52 50 73 CLAY % <<0 .002 MM) 21 34 LIQUID LIMIT % 22 31 17 PLASTIC LIMIT % 11 12 10 PLAST ICITY INDEX % 11 19 7 NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT % 11.0 13.4 10.7 DRY UNIT WE IGHT 129.9 123.7 130.7 pH 9.26 SOLUBLE CHLORIDES <50 SOLUBLE SULFATES <150 L-O-I % ORGAN IC CONTENT WET COMBUSTION %
TESTI NG SERVICE CORPORATION 457 East Gunderse n Drive Carol Stream, Illi no is TSC Job No. L - 72,070 September 9, 2008 CLIENT: Sargent & Lundy, LLC 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, IL PROJ ECT: ISFSI Project Zion Nuclear power Plant Zion, IL SOIL TEST DATA LOCATI ON BOR ING NUMBER 1-2 1 1-21 1-21 1-2 1 1-2 1 SAMPLE NUMBER 2 5 9 11 17 DEPTH IN FEET HRB CLASSIFICATION & GROUP INDEX UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION SP SP CL CL CL UNCONFINED COMPRESS IVE STRENGTH 5.41 NP NP (TSF) GRADAn ON - PASS IN G 1" SIEVE % 86 GRADATION - PASS ING 3/4" SIEVE % 86 100 100 GRADATION - PASS ING 3/8" SIEVE % 100 79 100 98 98 GRADATION - PASSING # 4 SIEVE % 99 76 99 95 97 GRADATI ON - PASS ING # 10 SIEVE % 99 71 98 93 96 GRADATION - PASS ING # 40 SIEVE % 96 62 95 85 89 GRADATION - PASS ING # 100 SIEVE % 9 7 92 79 83 GRADATION - PASSING # 200 SIEVE % 4 4 91 76 78 SAND AND GRAVEL% 96 96 9 25 22 SILT OR SILT AND CLAY COMBI NED% 4 4 59 51 51 CLAY % << 0.002 MMl 32 24 27 LI QUID LI MIT % 28 23 25 PLASTIC LI MIT % 14 12 12 PLASTI CITY INDEX % 14 11 11 3 NATURAL MOISTURE CONTE NT % 12.7 13.0 15.7 DRY UNIT WEIGHT 122.7 124. 7 11 8.3 pH 9. 11 SOLUBLE CHLORIDES <50 SOLUBLE SULFATES <150 L-O-I % ORGANIC CO NTENT WET COMBUSTION % NP - No t Possi ble
u.s. SIEVE OPEN ING IN INCHES I U.S . SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 1/2 3/8 3 4 6 81014162030405070 100140200 100
~
I I I I I I I 90
----. ~
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
\
\
\
0 100 10 1 0. 1 0.0 1 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVE L SAND COBB LES SILT OR CLAY coarse fin e coarse med ium fine SPEC IM EN IDE NTI FICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Bori ng: 1-20 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, trace silt, clay and gravel 2 100 (SP) Sample: 2 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVE L %SAND %S ILT %CLAY NOTES : 3/4 100 8 86 (6% Com ined) 3/8 95
#4 92
# 10 88
# 40 79
# 100 14
# 200 6 PROJECT ISFS I Zion Nu clear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATI O N Zio n, Illin ois DAT E Se ptember 8, 2008
' -LU oc SO IL DATA SHEET z
w Testin g Se rvi ce Co rp orati on "i Carol Stream, IL 60 188 6
u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 "4 112 3/8 3 4 6 81014162030405070100140200 100 I I , T I I I I I
"'- I'---<
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
\
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS I GRAVE L SAND I COBB LES I coarse I SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION fin e coarse medium SIEVE fin e
% PASS SILT ORCLAY SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring : 1-20 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, Irace sill, clay and gravel 2 100 (SP)
Sample: 7 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SA NO %SILT %C LAY NOTES: 3/4 100 5 91 (4% Com ined) 3/8 99
#4 95
#10 91
#40 71
# 100 8
# 200 4 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 I-<U SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188
l,J.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 112 3/8 3 4 6 81014162030405070100140200 100 I I T I I I I t-
~
90
.f'--
80
~
70 60
" t 50 1\
"\
40 30 20
'I'-
10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL I SAND J SILT OR CLAY coarse fine Icoarse medium fine I SPECIM EN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, some sand, trace gravel 2 100 (Cl) Sample: 12 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 3 24 52 21 3/8 99
#4 97
#10 95
#40 85
# 100 77
# 200 73
~ PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070
" LOCATION Zion, Illin ois DATE September 8, 2008
~ 1-ZU SOIL DATA SHEET "z
w Testing Serv ice Corporation '3 Carol Stream, IL 60188 600
u.s. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 112 3/8 3 4 6 8 10 1416 20 30 40 50 701 00140200 100 I I * , f-l, ~ I I 90 ----
~
80 70
*\
~
60 \ 50 40 "1\ 30 "'--- 20 10 0 100 10 1 0. 1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVE L SAND COBB LES SILT ORC LAY coarse fi ne coarse med ium fi ne SPECIMEN IDE NTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Bori ng : 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand , trace gravel Sample: 22 2 100 (Cll 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 15 50 34 3/8 99
#4 99
# 10 97
#40 92
# 100 88
# 200 84 PROJECT ISFS I Zion Nu clea r Power Plant JOB NO. L-72 ,070 LOCATI ON Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008
,-.u SO IL DATA SHEET Testin g Service Co rporation Carol Strea m, IL 60 188
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDRO METER
. 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 3/4 1/23/83 4 6 8 10 1416 20 30 40 50 70 100140200 100 I I I I I I I I 90 80 70
" \
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 10 1 0. 1 0.0 1 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLI METERS GRAVEL SAND COBBLES SILT OR CLAY coarse fin e coarse medi um fin e SPECIM EN IDE NTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASS IFICATION Borin q: 1-20 3 inch 100 Gray silly CLAY, some sand (Cl ) 2 100 Sample: 32 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVE L %SAND %SILT %C LAY NOTES : 3/4 100 0 27 (73% Corr bined) 3/8 100
#4 100
#1 0 100
# 40 98
# 100 88
# 200 73 PROJECT ISFS I Zion Nu clear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illin ois DATE September 8, 2008
' - LU SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Servi ce Co rp oration Carol Stream, IL 60 188
u.s. SIEVE OPE NING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 13/4 112 83 4 6 8 10 1416 20 30 40 50 70100140200 100 I I . I I 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
'\
0 100 10 1 0.1 0.0 1 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVE L SAND COBBLE S SILT OR CLAY coarse I fin e coarse med ium fin e SPEC IM EN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASS IFICATION Boring: 1-2 1 3 inch 100 Brown SAND, trace silt, clay and gravel 2 100 (SP) Sample: 2 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVE L %SAND %S ILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 95 (4% Com ined) 3/8 100
#4 99
#10 99
# 40 96
# 100 9
# 200 4 PROJECT ISFSI Zio n Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Ill inois DATE September 8, 2008
'-L' SOIL DATA SHEET Testing Serv ice Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188
U.S. SIEVE OPE NING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 5 1 314 112 318 3 4 6 8 10 14162030405070 100140200 100 I I I I I I I I
\
90
~ I-80
."" . 1"-
70 60 II 50 40 30 20 10 1\
~
0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRA IN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND COBBLES SILT OR CLAY coarse fine coarse medium fine SP ECIM EN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION BorinQ : 1-21 3 inch 100 Light brown SAND, some gravel, Irace sill 2 100 and clay (SP) Sample: 5 1 1/2 100 1 86 %GRAVE L %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 86 24 72 (4% Com ined) 3/8 79
#4 76
#10 71
#40 62
# 100 7
# 200 4 PROJECT ISFS I Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE Septembe r 8, 2008
'-L' SO IL DATA SH EET Testing Service Corporation Carol Stream, IL 601 88
u.s. SIEVE OPE NING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1 .5 1 3/4 1/2 83 4 6 8 10 1416 20 30 40 50 70 100140200 100 I I I I I I r--.. 90 r-.--..
"\
80 *
\
70
~
\
60 50
~
40 1\ 30
\
20 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND COBBLES SILT OR CLAY coarse 1 fine coarse medium fine SPEC IM EN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SOIL CLASSIFICATION Boring: 1-2 1 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, trace sand and gravel 2 100 (Cl) Sample: 9 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SA NO %S ILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 1 8 59 32 3/8 100
#4 99
#10 98
#40 95
# 100 92
# 200 91 PROJECT ISFSI Zion Nuclear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illinois DATE September 8, 2008 1-[1 SO IL DATA SHEET Testing Serv ice Corporation Carol Stream, IL 60188
u.s. SIEVE OP ENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 114 1123/83 4 6 8 10 1416 20 30 40 50 70 100140 200 100 I I * 'i-- I I I I I
~
90
~
.1'--
80 "'- 70 60 \ 50 I' "\ 40 30 20 ". 10 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.00 1 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS I GRAVEL I SAND I SILT OR CLAY I COBBLES I coarse fi ne Icoarse med iu m I fine I SPEC IM EN IDENTIFICATION SIEVE % PASS SO IL CLASSIFICATION Boring : 1-21 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand , trace gravel 2 100 (Cl ) Sample: 11 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %S ILT %CLAY NOTES: 3/4 100 5 20 51 24 3/8 98
#4 95
# 10 93
# 40 85
# 100 79
# 200 76 PROJECT ISFS I Zion Nu clea r Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATION Zion, Illin ois DATE September 8, 2008 I- L I SOIL DATA SH EET Testin g Se rvi ce Corpo ration Carol Stream , IL 60188
U.S. SIEVE OPEN ING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 4 112 3/8 3 4 6 81014162030405070 100140200 100 I I . "l- I I I I I 90 1"1"-
~
80 70
~r--
60
'\
50 ~ 40 I~ 30
" f\
~
20 10 0 100 10 1 0 .1 0 .0 1 0.00 1 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND COBBLES S ILTOR C LAY coarse fin e coarse medium fine SPECIM EN IDE NTIFICATION SIEVE % PA SS SOIL CLA SSIFICATI ON Boring: 1-2 1 3 inch 100 Gray silty CLAY, little sand, trace gravel 2 100 (eL) Sample: 17 1 1/2 100 1 100 %GRAVEL %SAND %SILT %CLAY NOTES : 3/4 100 3 19 51 27 3/8 98
#4 97
# 10 96
#40 89
# 100 83
# 200 78 PROJECT ISFSI Zio n Nuc lear Power Plant JOB NO. L-72,070 LOCATIO N Zion , Illin ois DATE Sept ember 8, 2008 1-'"
SOIL DATA SHEET Tes ting Servi ce Corp o rati o n Carol Stream, IL 60 188
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shore Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563
- Phone (630) 778-1 200
- Fax (630) 778- 1233 September 03, 2008 Mr. Darin Delaney TESTING SERVICE CORP.
360 So, Main Place Carol Stream, IL 60188 Proj ect lD: 72070 First Environmental File ID: 8-3902 Date Received : August 27, 2008
Dear Mr. Darin Delaney:
The above referenced project was analyzed as directed on the enclosed chain of custody record. All Quality Control criteria as outlined in the methods and current IL ELAPINELAP have been met unless otherwise noted. QAlQC documentation and raw data will remain on fi le for future reference. Our accreditation number is 100292 and our current certificate is number 002045: effective 05/14/08 through 02/28/09 . I thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you and look forward to working with you again in the future. Should you have any questions regarding any of the enclosed analytical data or need additional information, please contact me at (630) 778-1200. g;~v Project Ma\~ger Page lof4
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shorc Road* Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phonc (630) 778-1200
- Fax (630) 778-1233 Case NalTative TESTING SERVICE CORP.
Project ID: 72070 First Environmental File JD: 8-3902 Date Received: August 27, 2008 IFtagl Descriplion IFtag I Descriplion
< Anal yle not detec ted at or above the repotting limit. L+ LeS recovery olltside controllilllils; high biilS.
D Ana lytc detected in associated method blank. L- LeS recovery outside control limils; low bias. C Identi fi cation confillned by GC/MS. M MS recovery outside conlrollimils; LeS acceptable. D Surrogates diluted out; recovery not availabl e. M+ MS recovery olltside conlrollimits high bias; LeS acceptable. E Estimated result; concent ration exceeds calibrJlion range. M- MS recovery olltside control limits low bias; LeS acceptable. F Field measurement. N Ana lyte is 110t pmt of a liI' NE LAC accreditation. Analyte was not detectcd using a library searc h routine; No NO calibration standard was rumlyzcd. G Surrogate recovcry outs ide control limits; matri x effect. P Chemical preselvation pH adjusted in lab. 1-1 Analysis or extraction holding time exceedcd. Q 'lllCana lyte was dctennined by a GC/MS dattlbase search. Estimated result; concentration is less than calib range. S Analyte was sub-contracted to anot her laboratory for analys is. K RPD outside control limits. T Sample temperature upon receipt exceeded 0_6°C Routine Reportin g Limit (Lowest amount that can be RL detected when routine weight s/vo lulllcs are used without \V Reporting limit elevated due to sample matrix. di lution.) All quality co ntrol criter ia, as outl ined in the methods, have been met except as noted below or on the foll owing analytical report. Sample Batch Com ments: Sample acceptance criteria were met. Page 20f4
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP / NELAC Accreditntion ll [00292
-"""!'~!!!== 1600 Shore Rand
- Naperville, Ill inois 60563* Phone (630) 778- 1200
- Fax (630) 778-1233 Analytical Report Clicnt: TESTfNG SERV ICE CORP. Date Collected: 08/27/08 Project ID: 72 070 T illie Collected : 10:00 Salll pie ID: 1-20 S-2 Date Received: 08/27/08 Sample No: 8-3902-00 I Date Reported: 09/03/08 Analyte Result R.L. Units F lags Chloride, Soluble Method: 4500CL,C Analysis Date: 09/03/08 Chl oride, Soluble < 50 50 mg/kg Sulfate, Soluble Method: 4500S04,E Analysis Date: 09/03 /08 Su lfate, Soluble < 150 ISO mg/kg pH @25°C, 1:10 Method: 4500H+B Analysis Date: 08128/08 13:30 pH @ 25°C, I: I 0 9.26 Units Page 30f4
First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. IL ELAP I NELAC Accreditation # 100292 1600 Shore Road
- Naperville, Illinois 60563* Phone (630) 778-1200
- Fax (630) 778-1233 Analytical Report Client: TESTING SERVICE CORP. Date Collected: 08/27/08 Project ID: 72070 Time Collected: 10:00 SampleID: 1-2 1 S-2 Date Received: 08/27/08 Sample No: 8-3902-002 Date Reported: 09103/08 Analyte Resnlt R.L. Units Flags Chloride, Soluble Method: 4500CL,C Analys is Date: 09103/08 Ch loride, Soluble < 50 50 mglkg Sulfate, Soluble Method: 4500S04,E Analysis Date : 09103/08 Sulfate, Soluble < 150 150 mglkg pH @ 25°C, 1:10 Method: 4500H+B Analysis Date: 08/2 8/08 13 :30 pH @ 25°C, I: 10 9.11 Units Page 4 of4
,~.. First Environmental Laboratories, Inc.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Cornp~tny Name: -~SC Pagc __ of _ _ pgs First Environmental Laboratories Streel Address: 1600 Shore Road, Suite D City: State: Z ip: Naperville, Illinois 60563 Phone: Fax: e-mail: Phone: (630) 778-1200* Fax: (630) 778-1233 E-mail : firstinfo@firstenv.com Send Report T o : . . . Via: Fax 0 cornall 0 !EPA Certification #100292 Sampled By: ,I )~Y I 1/1 I hi(~1"",,'" 7 Analyses Project 1.0.: 1201 0 P.O.#.: Matrix Codes: S = Soil W = Water 0 = Other DatefIime Taken Sample Description Matrix Comments Lab LD. B-] 5
~0 FOR LAB USE ONLY: r f Cooler Temperature: O.1~-6gCYes_ N / I) s: 'Q C Sample Refrigerated : Yes_ No_ Containers Received Preserved: No Received within 6 hrs. of co ction: _ __ Refrigerator Temperature: _ _ _' C Ice Present: Yes_ No 5035 Vials Froze n: Yes_ No_
Freezer Temperature: _ __ ' C Notes and Special Instructions: _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Relinquished By: Relinquished By: r j ) , .A?~ DatefJlme DatefIime Q-2.t-6:':1 <? z. ' 3 ., Received By: Received By: I - j..---- 0 r
\, ../ DalefJlme Date!Time _ _ _
v { v 'I II 1_ _ ______ _ v '-" ( ~ Rc\'. -'lOIl}}