ML16341C638

DC Cook 2016 ES-201-2 Outline Quality Checklist

ML16341C638
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	12/02/2016
From:	NRC/RGN-III
To:	Indiana Michigan Power Co, American Electric Power
Shared Package
ML15274A374	List: ML16340B505 ML16340B553 ML16340B595 ML16340B643 ML16341C619 ML16341C638 ML16341C656
References
ES-201-2
Download: ML16341C638 (1)

Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination lnitials Item Task Description a b- c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N 5( R b.

5l R,eB R Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance wth Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(/A categories are appropriately sampled.

I T

T E c Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics  ! 5t ,.S N

d. Assess whether the justfcatons for deselected or rejected l(A statements are appropriate. -t/ 1-f ApB

2. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of 4Y F4 normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s transients.

I M b Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule U

L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenaros are duplicated from the 1/ 4d' k

A T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days' o

R

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D" bl A,f,'3

3. a Verify that the systems walk{hrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(t tne outlne(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed

, among the safety functions as specified on the form y' A (Z tast< repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limts specified on the form./

a L

K

{øl

Ø

,/<sl no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) .,/

the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form./

the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria ony' i(

T the form.

H R b. /erify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1 :

o {lD the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form U /(Z) at least one task is new or significantly modified z i { i 4/ 7{ .8 G 4Zl no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations ¿ '

H

c. Determne if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of 4l ,( E applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a, Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. i6 RG G

E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. iW ?,(?

N E

c. Ensure that KA importance ratings (except for pl ant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. ,'( R$\

R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. 4 >ó Rr A

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. 't/ ;f' Rrg

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). -1/ >?r s)

Printed Date

a. Author ló ¿{ -tb

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

q;ø-f¿

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 'ttlt¿

d. NRC Supervisor sl¿l-fu-¿'

Note: # lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required

• Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

C) roiN- yq$.*o P)r<tr.re -a4P,r^ url.t

)-iA r4$.&- *

• b,.la, (a'^ nd-^ c-J-d ,rf"-^ *J,-c ;5.$p. ç ES-201, Page 26 of 28