ML18074A360: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
: 2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question a 1 (easy) to 5 (difficult); questions with a difficulty between 2 and 4 are acceptable. | : 2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question a 1 (easy) to 5 (difficult); questions with a difficulty between 2 and 4 are acceptable. | ||
3. | 3. | ||
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified: | Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified: | ||
"Stem Focus": The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information) . | "Stem Focus": The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information) . | ||
"Cues": The stem or distractors contain cues (e.g., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length) . | "Cues": The stem or distractors contain cues (e.g., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length) . | ||
'T/F": The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements . | 'T/F": The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements . | ||
Line 41: | Line 39: | ||
"Partial": One or more distractors are partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by the stem). | "Partial": One or more distractors are partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by the stem). | ||
4. | 4. | ||
Check the appropriate box if a job content flaw is identified: | Check the appropriate box if a job content flaw is identified: | ||
"Job Link": The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content) . | "Job Link": The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content) . |
Latest revision as of 10:46, 3 February 2020
ML18074A360 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Millstone |
Issue date: | 10/30/2017 |
From: | Peter Presby Operations Branch I |
To: | Dominion Energy Nuclear Connecticut |
Shared Package | |
ML17094A469 | List: |
References | |
CAC U01946, ES-401, ES-401-9 | |
Download: ML18074A360 (7) | |
Text
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9
- 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other
- 1. LOK 6. Source 7. Status Q LOD 8. Explanation (F/H) Stem Cred. Job- (B/M/N) (U/E/S)
(1-5) Cues T/F Partial Minutia #/Units Backward Q-KIA SRO Only Focus Dist Link Modified distractor "d" to 1 H 3 N E improve plausibility.
Added detail to the sequence of 2 H 4 B E events (#4) and corrected typos Modified stem and distractor "d" 3 F 3 B E to improve distractor plausibility.
Re-categorized Q as Fundamental. Modified wording 4 F 3 N E of Q to eliminate need for the term "only" in the choices.
5 H 3 B s No comments Reworded distractors to 6 H 3 N E improve plausibility.
Changed from 2x2 format, distractors modified to raise 7 F 2 N E LOD and improve operational relevance. KIA match was explained better.
Reworded to ensure distractor 8 F 3 N E is wrong and to raise LOD.
Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts:
- 1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
- 2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question a 1 (easy) to 5 (difficult); questions with a difficulty between 2 and 4 are acceptable.
3.
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
"Stem Focus": The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information) .
"Cues": The stem or distractors contain cues (e.g., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length) .
'T/F": The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements .
. "Cred. Dist.": The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, and more than one is unacceptable .
"Partial": One or more distractors are partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by the stem).
4.
Check the appropriate box if a job content flaw is identified:
"Job Link": The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content) .
. "Minutia": The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed-reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory) .
"#/Units": The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons) .
- "Backward": The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
- 5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those KIAs that are designated "SRO-only." (KIA and license-level mismatches are unacceptable.)
- 6. Enter question's source: (B)ank, (M)odified, or (N)ew. Verify that (M)odified questions meet the criteria of Form ES-401, Section D.2.f.
- 7. Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question, as written, (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 8. At a minimum, explain any "U" status ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5.0ther
- 6. Source 7. Status Q LOK LOO 8. Explanation Stem Cred. (B/M/N) (U/E/S)
(F/H) (1-5) Cues T/F Partial Job-Link Minutia # I Units Backward Q-K/A SRO Only Focus Dist 9 H 4 B s Reworded choices to improve 10 H 3 B E discriminatory value.
Reworded choices to improve 11 H 3 B E discriminatory value.
The question was changed to 12 H 3 N E 2x2 format and distractors reworded for better plausibility.
Modified Q and choice wording 13 F 3 N E to reduce number of repeated words in choices.
Replaced with bank Q to match 14 H 4 X N u the KIA.
Removed window-dressing from 15 F 3 B E Q stem.
Reworded Q to address 16 F 2 N E psychometric and plausibility weaknesses.
17 F 3 N s No comments Reworded distractors to improve 18 F 3 N E plausibility Reworded distractors to improve 19 H 3 B E plausibility 20 F 3 B s No comments 21 H 3 B s No comments Distractors A and B were not plausible given the stem 22 H 3 X N u information. Reworded all 4 distractors to improve olausibility.
23 H 4 B E Minor wording change in stem Reduced word count and 24 H 3 B E simplified stem to use distractors that use times only
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5.0ther
- 6. Source 7. Status Q LOK LOD 8. Explanation Stem Cred. (B/M/N) (U/E/S)
(F/H) (1-5) Cues T/F Partial Job-Link Minutia #/ Units Backward Q-K/A SRO Only Focus Dist 25 F 3 B s No comments 26 F 2 B s No comments 27 F 3 B s No comments 28 H 3 B E Added detail to distractor "C" Added wording to distractors "C" 29 H 3 N E and "D" 30 F 3 N E Stem wording added Question was too verbose and 31 F 3 B E was simplified to 2x2 fonnat LOD1 - question too simple.
32 H 1 X N u New question written Poor KIA match. New bank 33 F 3 X B u question selected 34 H 3 B s No comments Distractor plausibililty needed 35 F 2 X B u improvement. New bank auestion selected 36 F 3 N s No comments Question was not operationally 37 H 3 X M E valid. New question written.
Too easy to eliminate distractors.
Distractor plausibililty needed 38 H 3 X B u improvement. New bank auestion selected Stem reworded to improve 39 F 3 N E clarity.
Choice C implausible. New bank 40 H 3 X B u question selected
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other
- 6. Source 7. Status Q LOK LOO 8. Explanation Stem Cred. (B/M/N) (U/E/S)
(F/H) (1-5) Cues T/F Partial Job-Link Minutia # I Units Backward Q-KIA SRO Only Focus Dist Revised stem, changed to 2x2 41 H 4 B E format to clarify and improve KIA match.
Too many repeated words in the 42 H 3 N E stem. Simplified stem by removing repeated words.
43 H 1 X N u LOO 1. Rewrote new question 44 H 3 B E Minor stem rewording Modified distractors to improve 45 H 3 B E plausibility.
46 H 3 N s No comments Choice C was not plausible.
47 F 3 X B u Selected new bank question.
48 H 3 B s No comments Oistractor A was implausible and 49 F 2 X B u B and C were not logical.
Reselected a new bank auestion.
50 H 3 B s No comments Reworded stem to remove 51 H 4 B E repeated words Distractor A is not believable.
52 F 3 X B u Reselected new bank question 3 part question structure was too 53 H 3 B E confusing. Rewrote to 2 part.
Oistractors were reworded to 54 F 3 N E improve plausibility.
KIA mismatch. Question 55 H 3 X N u rewritten.
56 H 3 B E Minor rewording of stem Minor rewording of distractors in 57 F 2 N E part 2
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5.0ther
- 6. Source 7. Status Q LOK LOO 8. Explanation Stem Cred. (B/M/N) (U/E/S)
(F/H) (1-5) Cues T/F Partial Job-Link Minutia # I Units Backward Q-K/A SRO Only Focus Dist Question distractors revised to 58 F 1 B E improve plausibility.
59 H 4 B E Minor rewording in stem 60 H 4 N s No comments 61 H 3 N s No comments 62 F 3 N s No comments 63 F 3 B s No comments Minor format edits made in 2x2 64 H 3 B E structure 65 H/F 3 B E Changed to Fundamental level Modified distractors to improve 66 F 3 N E discriminatory value.
67 F 3 B s No comments 68 F 3 B s No comments 69 H 3 M s No comments 70 H 4 B s No comments Question was not discriminating.
71 F 3 X N u Reselected a bank question.
72 F 3 B s No comments Added to stem to bound time 73 H 3 N E frame Small distractor wording 74 F 3 N E modifications made
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other
- 6. Source 7. Status Q LOK LOO 8. Explanation Stem Cred. (8/M/N) (U/E/S)
(F/H) (1-5) Cues T/F Partial Job-Link Minutia # I Units Backward Q-K/A SRO Only Focus Dist 75 H 3 B E Reworded distractors Changed initial conditions from 50% to 100% and reworded 76 H 4 N E distractors to improve discriminatory value.
More than one correct answer (A 77 H 4 X N u and C are both correct).
Rewrote auestion.
Minor changes to improve 78 H 3 N E discriminatory value.
79 H 3 N s No comments 80 H 3 B s No comments 81 H 4 B s No comments 82 H 3 N E Typo - changed ANSI to ANS 83 H 3 B s No comments 84 H 3 B s No comments 85 H 3 B s No comments Changed to 2x2 format and 86 H 3 B E modified stem 87 H 3 N s No comments Reworded distractor D for 88 H 3 B E plausibility Selected bank question as new 89 H 3 X N u question as-written was not discriminatina.
90 F 3 N s No comments
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other
- 6. Source 7. Status Q LOK LOD 8. Explanation Stem Cred. (B/M/N) (U/E/S)
(F/H) (1-5) Cues T/F Partial Job-Link Minutia # I Units Backward Q-K/A SRO Only Focus Dist Distractors reworded to improve 91 F 3 N E LOD.
KIA mismatch. Bank question 92 H 4 X B u selected.
Not SRO only level/ DLU.
93 H 3 X N u Question rewritten as new.
94 H 3 B s No comments 95 F 3 B E Minor stem rewording 96 H 3 B s No comments Reworded distractors to improve 97 H 3 B E discriminatory value.
98 F 3 B s No comments 99 F 3 B s No comments Not discriminating. Rewrote 100 F 3 X B u distractors to improve plausibility.