ML18096A638: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:*
{{#Wiki_filter:(~ PS~G Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Salem Generating Station April 14, .1992 U. S~ Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC               20555
* Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Salem Generating Station U. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555  


==Dear Sir:==
==Dear Sir:==
SALEM GENERATING STATION LICENSE NO. DPR-75 ,DOOKET NO. 50-311 UNIT NO. 2 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 92-005-00 April 14, .1992 This Licensee Event Report is being submitted pursuant to the of the Code of Federal Regulations lOCFR 50.73(a) (2) (iv). This report is rciquired to be issued within thirty (30) days of event discovery.
 
MJP:pc Distribution Sincerely yours, C. *A. Vondra General Manager -Salem Operations I / 95-2i89 110M) 12-9 NRC FORM 366 (6-1'91 .* U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED OMB NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 4/30192 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (p-5301, U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-01041, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503. FACILITY NAME (11 Salem Generating Station -Unit 2 I DOCKET NUMBER (21 I PAGE (31 0 15 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 311 I ii 1 OFI 0 i 3 TITLE (41 Unanticipated Reactor Trip Breaker Opening During Manual SI-Testing EVENT DATE (51 LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (71 O!HER FACILITIES INVOLVED (Bl MONTH DAY VEAR YEAR tr:
SALEM GENERATING STATION LICENSE NO. DPR-75
MONTH DAY YEAR FACILITY NAMES DOCKET NUMBERISI al 3 6 9 2 9 I 2 -o lo 15. -ol o o I 4 i 14 912 01S1010101 I I OPERATING MODE (Ill THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE OF 10 CFR &sect;: (Check on* or more of <h* fol/owing}
,DOOKET NO. 50-311 UNIT NO. 2 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 92-005-00 This Licensee Event Report is being submitted pursuant to the req~irements of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR 50.73(a) (2) (iv). This report is rciquired to be issued within thirty (30) days of event discovery.
(111 5 20.402(bl 20 . .COS(cl ....._ 60.38(ci(11
Sincerely yours, C. *A. Vondra General Manager -
....._ ,_ -73.71(bl 73.71(cl PO WE R I 20 . .C05(1)(11UI 0 I 0 ,o ....._ 20 * .C05(1)(l)(ill 20.405(sl(11(1111 20 * .C05(11(1 l(ivl 20 * .C05(11!1 IM 50.38(c)(21 50.73(11(21(1*1  
Salem Operations MJP:pc Distribution
....___ 50.73(11(2lliv) 50.73(1H21M 50.73(11(2) (viii 50,73(11(2)(viili(Al 50.73(1)(2)(viiil(Bl
                                                                                      /i~JJ;              I
-OTHER (Spocify in Abs<rsct snd ;n Text, NRC Form 366A} ....._ ..__ 150,73(1)(2)(ii)  
                                                                                        / 95-2i89 110M) 12- 9
,,__ ..__ 50,73(1)(2lliiil LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (121 NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER -.. ..... _ AREA CODE M. J" Pollack -LER Coordinator 6 I 0 19 3 F3 19 I-I' 2 10 I 21 2 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (131 CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT. TURER R E i.' .. l.iii .. *:ilii.i'i._i***i*:l:**::  
 
.. :.111::**:*:1*
NRC FORM 366                                                                           U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (6-1'91 .*                                                                                                                                                                             APPROVED OMB NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 4/30192 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS. FORWARD LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)                                                                                                  COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (p-5301, U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-01041, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.
CAUSE SYSTEM
FACILITY NAME (11                                                                                                                                                                 DOCKET NUMBER (21                     I                   PAGE (31 Salem Generating Station - Unit 2 TITLE (41 I0  15 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 311 I         ii 1 OFI 0 i 3 Unanticipated Reactor Trip Breaker Opening During Manual SI- Testing EVENT DATE (51                             LER NUMBER (6)                                   REPORT DATE (71                                                   O!HER FACILITIES INVOLVED (Bl MONTH       DAY       VEAR           YEAR     tr: SE~~~~~~AL tr:~~~~~            MONTH                           DAY                   YEAR                   FACILITY NAMES                     DOCKET NUMBERISI al 3       ~ 6 9               2 9 2 -I            olo 15. - ol o oI 4                                       i 14                     912                                                       01S1010101                                   I           I OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE R~QUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR                                                 &sect;:   (Check on* or more of <h* fol/owing} (111 I
::!i!ii.l!iii-i*i!l*.:!,J.,:J.,:.,::J,-:::*:.:::i:i.:
MODE (Ill                5 1-~~.......;..~~--J'--~-
COMPONENT MANUFAC* TUR ER I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :*.-*=.:*ilil*i:i*.:1**:1=*:::1:111:1:.::,.,1:1.111::  
20.402(bl
!*:*:*:*:*:*'.-'.*'.*'.*
                                                                            ....._       20 ..COS(cl                                                ,_~      50.73(11(2lliv)                           73.71(bl POWE R L~,~~L      0I0          ,o ....._
:*:*:*:*:
20 ..C05(1)(11UI 20 *.C05(1)(l)(ill 20.405(sl(11(1111
::::: *:-:-:-:.;
                                                                            ~
;:;::::::::::
60.38(ci(11 50.38(c)(21 50.73(11(21(1*1 50.73(1H21M 50.73(11(2) (viii 50,73(11(2)(viili(Al 1--
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ::::*:::::::::*:*:*:-:*:*:*:*:*:*::::;::::::}!:
73.71(cl OTHER (Spocify in Abs<rsct b~low 366A}
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED 1141 MONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE 1151 n YES (If y*s, compl*t* EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE} r-xi NO I I ABSTRACT. (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e .. approximately f(fteen single-space tyPewritten lines} (.16) On March 16, 1992, at 1452 hours, the "B" reactor trip *breaker (RTB) opened during Solid State Protection.
snd ;n Text, NRC Form 20 *.C05(11(1 l(ivl
System (SSPS) testing. The Unit was in Mode 5 (Cold Shutdown).
                                                                            ,,__           150,73(1)(2)(ii)
At the time of the event, performance of Operations Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q}, "Manual Safety Injection" was in progress concurrent with the replacement of Rosemount steam flow transmitters under design change package (DCP) 2EC-3078.
                                                                                                                                                      ..__     50.73(1)(2)(viiil(Bl 20 *.C05(11!1 IM                              50,73(1)(2lliiil                                                      lio.73(11(21(~1 LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (121 NAME                                                                                                                                                                                                TELEPHONE NUMBER
The cause of this event is procedure inadequacy.
                -..    -~..... _                                                                                                                                                       AREA CODE M. J" Pollack - LER Coordinator                                                                                                                                                       6 I 0 19 3 F3 19 I- I' 2 10 I 21 2 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (131 CAUSE     SYSTEM           COMPONENT.             MANUFAC-TURER       R ~60~~:gi  E i.' .. l.iii ..*:ilii.i'i._i***i*:l:**::..:.111::**:*:1*
Procedure did not identify that its performance, concurrent with an unusual plant configuration (i.e., all high steam flow bistables tripped), may cause the'opening of RTBs. Per Operations Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q), the SSPS Train B Mode Select Switch was turned to "TEST". This resulted in removal of the SI signal block (on high steam flow with low Tav) resulting in the "B" R.TB opening. A safety injection did not occur because the action.of taking the Trairi B Mode Select Switch to TEST the 118 VAC required to pick up the Train & SI relays.
CAUSE SYSTEM       COMPONENT MANUFAC*
S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q) has been revised by the addition of a "Caution Statement" identifying the consequence of moving the Mode Select Switch to TEST. Other station procedures (both Salem Units) which involve use of this switch will also be reviewed and .revised as appropriate.
TUR ER        R~6o~~:giE    ::!i!ii.l!iii-i*i!l*.:!,J.,:J.,:.,::J,-:::*:.:::i:i.:
NRC Form 366 (6-891
I               I   I   I           I     I I                                                                                     I           I     I   I         I   I   I
*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      ~:;::::::   ::::: *:-:-:-:.; ;:;::::::::::
* LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION S.alem Generating Station DOCKET NUMBER LER NUMBER PAGE PLANT AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION:
:*.-*=.:*ilil*i:i*.:1**:1=*:::1:111:1:.::,.,1:1.111::                                                                             ::::*:::::::::*:*:*:-:*:*:*:*:*:*::::;::::::}!:
Westinghouse
I              I  I    I          I      I  I                                                                                    I            I    I    I        I  I    I SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED 1141                                                                                                                 MONTH               DAY               YEAR EXPECTED n         YES (If y*s, compl*t* EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE}                                               r-xi             NO SUBMISSION DATE 1151 I                       I                  I ABSTRACT. (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e .. approximately f(fteen single-space tyPewritten lines} (.16)
-Pressurized Water Reactor Energy Industry Identification System (EIIS) codes are identified in the text as {xxf IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
On March 16, 1992, at 1452 hours, the "B" reactor trip *breaker (RTB) opened during Solid State Protection. System (SSPS) testing. The Unit was in Mode 5 (Cold Shutdown). At the time of the event, performance of Operations Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q}, "Manual Safety Injection" was in progress concurrent with the replacement of Rosemount steam flow transmitters under design change package (DCP) 2EC-3078. The cause of this event is procedure inadequacy. Procedure S2.0P-ST.S~P-0001(Q) did not identify that its performance, concurrent with an unusual plant configuration (i.e., all high steam flow bistables tripped), may cause the'opening of RTBs. Per Operations Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q), the SSPS Train B Mode Select Switch was turned to "TEST". This resulted in removal of the SI signal block (on high steam flow coinc~dent with low Tav) resulting in the "B" R.TB opening. A safety injection did not occur because the action.of taking the Trairi B Mode Select Switch to TEST re~oves the 118 VAC required to pick up the Train & SI relays.                                                                                                           Pro~edure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q) has been revised by the addition of a "Caution Statement" identifying the consequence of moving the Mode Select Switch to TEST. Other station procedures (both Salem Units) which involve use of this switch will also be reviewed and .revised as appropriate.
Unanticipated Reactor Trip Breaker opening during Manual Safety Injection testing Event Date: 3/16/92 Report Date: 4/14/92 T.his_ report was initiated by Incident Report No. 92-187. CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE:
NRC Form 366 (6-891
Mode 5 -Gth Refueling in progress DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE: .cin March 16, 1992, at 1452 hours, the "B" reactor trip breaker {RTB) {JC} opened during Solid State Protection System (SSPS} {JG} testing. The Unit was in Mode 5 {Cold Shutdown).
 
At the time of the event, performance of Operations Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q), "Manual Safety Injection" was in progress concurrent with the replacement of Rosemount steam flow transmitters under design change package {DCP) 2EC-3078.
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION S.alem Generating Station         DOCKET NUMBER       LER NUMBER         PAGE U-"-=n=i~t~2"--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5~0~0~0==3=1=1~~~~~9~2_-~005-00~~-,-~-2~o~f~*~3"---,--
Due to the actuation of the Reactor Protection System {JEI RTB opening), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was notified in ** accordance with the requir.ements of the Code of Federal Regulations lOCFR 50.72(b)(2)(ii).
PLANT AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION:
Westinghouse    - Pressurized Water Reactor Energy Industry Identification System (EIIS) codes are identified in the text as {xxf IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:
Unanticipated Reactor Trip Breaker opening during Manual Safety Injection testing Event Date:    3/16/92 Report Date:    4/14/92 T.his_ report was initiated by Incident Report No. 92-187.
CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE:
Mode 5 -  Gth Refueling in progress DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE:
    .cin March 16, 1992, at 1452 hours, the "B" reactor trip breaker {RTB)
{JC} opened during Solid State Protection System (SSPS} {JG}
testing. The Unit was in Mode 5 {Cold Shutdown). At the time of the event, performance of Operations Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q),
      "Manual Safety Injection" was in progress concurrent with the replacement of Rosemount steam flow transmitters under design change package {DCP) 2EC-3078.
Due to the actuation of the Reactor Protection System {JEI (i.e~, RTB opening), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was notified in
  ** accordance with the requir.ements of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR 50.72(b)(2)(ii).
APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE:
APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE:
The cause of this event is procedure inadequacy.
The cause of this event is procedure inadequacy. Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q) did not identify that its performance, concurrent with an unusual plant configuration {i.e., all high steam flow bistables tripped), may cause the opening of RTBs.
Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q) did not identify that its performance, concurrent with an unusual plant configuration
Steam flow Rosemount transmitter replacement design change work was in progress. In support of the this work, the high steam flow bistables were tripped thereby satisfying safety injection logic for "high steam flow coincident with low Tav".* However, since the Unit was below permissive P-12 {Tav < 541&deg;F), the SI signal was blocked.
{i.e., all high steam flow bistables tripped), may cause the opening of RTBs. Steam flow Rosemount transmitter replacement design change work was in progress.
Per- ste~ 5.~.4 of Operations Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001{Q), the SSPS Train B Mode Select Switch was turned to "TEST". This resulted in rernov~l of the SI signal block (o~ *high ste~m flow coincident with
In support of the this work, the high steam flow bistables were tripped thereby satisfying safety injection logic for "high steam flow coincident with low Tav".* However, since the Unit was below permissive P-12 {Tav < 541&deg;F), the SI signal was blocked. Per-of Operations Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001{Q), the SSPS Train B Mode Select Switch was turned to "TEST". This resulted in of the SI signal block *high flow coincident with
 
* *
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Salem Generating Station         DOCKET NUMBER    LER NUMBER        PAGE Unit 2                             5000311        92-005-00        3 of 3 APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE:     (cont'd) low Tav) * . The previous procedure step, 5.2.3, required closure of
* LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Salem Generating Station Unit 2 APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE:
      *the RTBs. Consequently, the "B" RTB opened asper design upon implementation of step.5.2.4. A safety injection did not occur because the action of taking the Train B Mode Select Switch to TEST
DOCKET NUMBER 5000311 (cont'd) LER NUMBER 92-005-00 PAGE 3 of 3 low Tav) *. The previous procedure step, 5.2.3, required closure of *the RTBs. Consequently, the "B" RTB opened asper design upon implementation of step.5.2.4.
      *removes the 118 VAC required
A safety injection did not occur because the action of taking the Train B Mode Select Switch to TEST *removes the 118 VAC required
* to pick up the Train B SI*. relays.
* to pick up the Train B SI*. relays. ANALYSIS OF OCCURRENCE:
ANALYSIS OF OCCURRENCE:
There are two (2) reactor trip. breakers ("A" and "B"J in series which connect.the output of the rod drive motor generator (MG). sets to the rod control power cabinets.
There are two (2) reactor trip. breakers ("A" and "B"J in series which connect.the output of the rod drive motor generator (MG). sets to the rod control power cabinets. In the event of a reactor trip signal, these breakers open, removing power from the control rod drive mechanisms allowing the control rods to drop into the reactor core.
In the event of a reactor trip signal, these breakers open, removing power from the control rod drive mechanisms allowing the control rods to drop into the reactor core. The opening of either breaker will cause this to occur. Two (2) Reactor Trip Bypass Breakers are provided to allow surveillance testing at power. No control rod movement occurred as a result of the "B" RTB opening. At the time of this event, the control rods were not capable of . withdrawal since their MG sets were cleared and tagged. The SSPS is not required to be operable in Mode 5 even though it was functional.
The opening of either breaker will cause this to occur. Two (2)
The "B" RTB and the SSPS functioned as designed; therefore, this did not affect the health or safety of the public. However, since the reactor protection system was actuated, this event.is reportable to the NRC in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations lOCFR 50.73(a) (2) (iv). CORRECTIVE ACTION: Pro6edure S2.0P-ST.SSP-000l(Q) has been revised by the addition of a "Caution identifying the consequence of movirig the Mode Select Switch to TEST. Other station procedures (both Saiem Units) which involve use of this switch will also reviewed and revised as appropriate.
Reactor Trip Bypass Breakers are provided to allow surveillance testing at power.
MJP:pc SORC Mtg. 92-045 General Manager -Salem Operations}}
No control rod movement occurred as a result of the "B" RTB opening.
At the time of this event, the control rods were not capable of
      . withdrawal since their MG sets were cleared and tagged.
The SSPS is not required to be operable in Mode 5 even though it was functional. The "B" RTB and the SSPS functioned as designed; therefore, this ~vent did not affect the health or safety of the public. However, since the reactor protection system was actuated, this event.is reportable to the NRC in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR 50.73(a) (2) (iv).
CORRECTIVE ACTION:
Pro6edure S2.0P-ST.SSP-000l(Q) has been revised by the addition of a "Caution State~ent" identifying the consequence of movirig the Mode Select Switch to TEST. Other station procedures (both Saiem Units) which involve use of this switch will also b~ reviewed and revised as appropriate.
General Manager -
Salem Operations MJP:pc SORC Mtg. 92-045}}

Latest revision as of 06:35, 3 February 2020

LER 92-005-00:on 920316,B Reactor Trip Breaker Opened During Solid State Protection Sys Testing.Caused by Procedural Inadequacy.Procedure S2.OP-ST.SSP-0001(Q) Revised by Addition of Caution statement.W/920414 Ltr
ML18096A638
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 04/14/1992
From: Pollack M, Vondra C
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LER-92-005-01, LER-92-5-1, NUDOCS 9204210377
Download: ML18096A638 (4)


Text

(~ PS~G Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 Salem Generating Station April 14, .1992 U. S~ Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Dear Sir:

SALEM GENERATING STATION LICENSE NO. DPR-75

,DOOKET NO. 50-311 UNIT NO. 2 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 92-005-00 This Licensee Event Report is being submitted pursuant to the req~irements of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR 50.73(a) (2) (iv). This report is rciquired to be issued within thirty (30) days of event discovery.

Sincerely yours, C. *A. Vondra General Manager -

Salem Operations MJP:pc Distribution

/i~JJ; I

/ 95-2i89 110M) 12- 9

NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (6-1'91 .* APPROVED OMB NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 4/30192 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WTH THIS INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS. FORWARD LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE RECORDS AND REPORTS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (p-5301, U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC 20555, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-01041, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.

FACILITY NAME (11 DOCKET NUMBER (21 I PAGE (31 Salem Generating Station - Unit 2 TITLE (41 I0 15 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 311 I ii 1 OFI 0 i 3 Unanticipated Reactor Trip Breaker Opening During Manual SI- Testing EVENT DATE (51 LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (71 O!HER FACILITIES INVOLVED (Bl MONTH DAY VEAR YEAR tr: SE~~~~~~AL tr:~~~~~ MONTH DAY YEAR FACILITY NAMES DOCKET NUMBERISI al 3 ~ 6 9 2 9 2 -I olo 15. - ol o oI 4 i 14 912 01S1010101 I I OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE R~QUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check on* or more of <h* fol/owing} (111 I

MODE (Ill 5 1-~~.......;..~~--J'--~-

20.402(bl

....._ 20 ..COS(cl ,_~ 50.73(11(2lliv) 73.71(bl POWE R L~,~~L 0I0 ,o ....._

20 ..C05(1)(11UI 20 *.C05(1)(l)(ill 20.405(sl(11(1111

~

60.38(ci(11 50.38(c)(21 50.73(11(21(1*1 50.73(1H21M 50.73(11(2) (viii 50,73(11(2)(viili(Al 1--

73.71(cl OTHER (Spocify in Abs<rsct b~low 366A}

snd ;n Text, NRC Form 20 *.C05(11(1 l(ivl

,,__ 150,73(1)(2)(ii)

..__ 50.73(1)(2)(viiil(Bl 20 *.C05(11!1 IM 50,73(1)(2lliiil lio.73(11(21(~1 LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (121 NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER

-.. -~..... _ AREA CODE M. J" Pollack - LER Coordinator 6 I 0 19 3 F3 19 I- I' 2 10 I 21 2 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (131 CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT. MANUFAC-TURER R ~60~~:gi E i.' .. l.iii ..*:ilii.i'i._i***i*:l:**::..:.111::**:*:1*

CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFAC*

TUR ER R~6o~~:giE  ::!i!ii.l!iii-i*i!l*.:!,J.,:J.,:.,::J,-:::*:.:::i:i.:

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

~:;::::::  ::::: *:-:-:-:.; ;:;::::::::::

  • .-*=.:*ilil*i:i*.:1**:1=*:::1:111:1:.::,.,1:1.111::  ::::*:::::::::*:*:*:-:*:*:*:*:*:*::::;::::::}!:

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED 1141 MONTH DAY YEAR EXPECTED n YES (If y*s, compl*t* EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE} r-xi NO SUBMISSION DATE 1151 I I I ABSTRACT. (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e .. approximately f(fteen single-space tyPewritten lines} (.16)

On March 16, 1992, at 1452 hours0.0168 days <br />0.403 hours <br />0.0024 weeks <br />5.52486e-4 months <br />, the "B" reactor trip *breaker (RTB) opened during Solid State Protection. System (SSPS) testing. The Unit was in Mode 5 (Cold Shutdown). At the time of the event, performance of Operations Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q}, "Manual Safety Injection" was in progress concurrent with the replacement of Rosemount steam flow transmitters under design change package (DCP) 2EC-3078. The cause of this event is procedure inadequacy. Procedure S2.0P-ST.S~P-0001(Q) did not identify that its performance, concurrent with an unusual plant configuration (i.e., all high steam flow bistables tripped), may cause the'opening of RTBs. Per Operations Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q), the SSPS Train B Mode Select Switch was turned to "TEST". This resulted in removal of the SI signal block (on high steam flow coinc~dent with low Tav) resulting in the "B" R.TB opening. A safety injection did not occur because the action.of taking the Trairi B Mode Select Switch to TEST re~oves the 118 VAC required to pick up the Train & SI relays. Pro~edure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q) has been revised by the addition of a "Caution Statement" identifying the consequence of moving the Mode Select Switch to TEST. Other station procedures (both Salem Units) which involve use of this switch will also be reviewed and .revised as appropriate.

NRC Form 366 (6-891

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION S.alem Generating Station DOCKET NUMBER LER NUMBER PAGE U-"-=n=i~t~2"--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5~0~0~0==3=1=1~~~~~9~2_-~005-00~~-,-~-2~o~f~*~3"---,--

PLANT AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION:

Westinghouse - Pressurized Water Reactor Energy Industry Identification System (EIIS) codes are identified in the text as {xxf IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:

Unanticipated Reactor Trip Breaker opening during Manual Safety Injection testing Event Date: 3/16/92 Report Date: 4/14/92 T.his_ report was initiated by Incident Report No.92-187.

CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE:

Mode 5 - Gth Refueling in progress DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE:

.cin March 16, 1992, at 1452 hours0.0168 days <br />0.403 hours <br />0.0024 weeks <br />5.52486e-4 months <br />, the "B" reactor trip breaker {RTB)

{JC} opened during Solid State Protection System (SSPS} {JG}

testing. The Unit was in Mode 5 {Cold Shutdown). At the time of the event, performance of Operations Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q),

"Manual Safety Injection" was in progress concurrent with the replacement of Rosemount steam flow transmitters under design change package {DCP) 2EC-3078.

Due to the actuation of the Reactor Protection System {JEI (i.e~, RTB opening), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) was notified in

APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE:

The cause of this event is procedure inadequacy. Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001(Q) did not identify that its performance, concurrent with an unusual plant configuration {i.e., all high steam flow bistables tripped), may cause the opening of RTBs.

Steam flow Rosemount transmitter replacement design change work was in progress. In support of the this work, the high steam flow bistables were tripped thereby satisfying safety injection logic for "high steam flow coincident with low Tav".* However, since the Unit was below permissive P-12 {Tav < 541°F), the SI signal was blocked.

Per- ste~ 5.~.4 of Operations Procedure S2.0P-ST.SSP-0001{Q), the SSPS Train B Mode Select Switch was turned to "TEST". This resulted in rernov~l of the SI signal block (o~ *high ste~m flow coincident with

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Salem Generating Station DOCKET NUMBER LER NUMBER PAGE Unit 2 5000311 92-005-00 3 of 3 APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE: (cont'd) low Tav) * . The previous procedure step, 5.2.3, required closure of

  • the RTBs. Consequently, the "B" RTB opened asper design upon implementation of step.5.2.4. A safety injection did not occur because the action of taking the Train B Mode Select Switch to TEST
  • removes the 118 VAC required
  • to pick up the Train B SI*. relays.

ANALYSIS OF OCCURRENCE:

There are two (2) reactor trip. breakers ("A" and "B"J in series which connect.the output of the rod drive motor generator (MG). sets to the rod control power cabinets. In the event of a reactor trip signal, these breakers open, removing power from the control rod drive mechanisms allowing the control rods to drop into the reactor core.

The opening of either breaker will cause this to occur. Two (2)

Reactor Trip Bypass Breakers are provided to allow surveillance testing at power.

No control rod movement occurred as a result of the "B" RTB opening.

At the time of this event, the control rods were not capable of

. withdrawal since their MG sets were cleared and tagged.

The SSPS is not required to be operable in Mode 5 even though it was functional. The "B" RTB and the SSPS functioned as designed; therefore, this ~vent did not affect the health or safety of the public. However, since the reactor protection system was actuated, this event.is reportable to the NRC in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR 50.73(a) (2) (iv).

CORRECTIVE ACTION:

Pro6edure S2.0P-ST.SSP-000l(Q) has been revised by the addition of a "Caution State~ent" identifying the consequence of movirig the Mode Select Switch to TEST. Other station procedures (both Saiem Units) which involve use of this switch will also b~ reviewed and revised as appropriate.

General Manager -

Salem Operations MJP:pc SORC Mtg.92-045