ML19326A570: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
~ | ~ | ||
g- .. | g- .. | ||
' ~ | ' ~ | ||
LICENS' E EVENT REPORT N | LICENS' E EVENT REPORT N | ||
Cournot stoC=. t | Cournot stoC=. t | ||
: 1. L.I I I l_.I, | : 1. L.I I I l_.I, awt teCENst Nuwet a tvet [v et | ||
@]9l0lliiDl bis 1ljla ' 15l0 j fj - J 01 0 1 "' ?li' I -f 0aa1 3J 2, l g lj lj l 11 i 30 310 3{ a C A t t s.cu' !'T t e'staN OoCat | |||
awt teCENst Nuwet a tvet [v et | |||
@]9l0lliiDl bis 1ljla ' 15l0 j fj - J 01 0 1 "' ?li' I -f 0aa1 3J 2, l g lj lj l 11 i 30 310 3{ a | |||
C A t t s.cu' !'T t e'staN OoCat | |||
* wuwet n ( ML N O (nA t t A(Pose f Q A f t Iolil Cou i- 1 I I LI O f .- 1 034 1 ! ! 6J [01710171717I .i dl8 1 01 3 i 7j7i P' t i>- sa 'W [FL1 si(0tSi c,a r,9 s. is d | * wuwet n ( ML N O (nA t t A(Pose f Q A f t Iolil Cou i- 1 I I LI O f .- 1 034 1 ! ! 6J [01710171717I .i dl8 1 01 3 i 7j7i P' t i>- sa 'W [FL1 si(0tSi c,a r,9 s. is d | ||
~ | ~ | ||
t vtut oe scruarioN g ; The Containment Sump Level and Flow Monitoring System, of tihe Reactorj | t vtut oe scruarioN g ; The Containment Sump Level and Flow Monitoring System, of tihe Reactorj g' Coolant System Leakage Detection System, was inoperable. AIflow trans- g | ||
) 49 - M g | ) 49 - M g | ||
a o mitter in the flow monitoring system was removed for calibration. This ; | a o mitter in the flow monitoring system was removed for calibration. This ; | ||
Line 44: | Line 34: | ||
@TJ l is not a repetitive occurrence. CG-33-77-20) ; | @TJ l is not a repetitive occurrence. CG-33-77-20) ; | ||
3 89 10 | 3 89 10 | ||
@ L . ---. _ | @ L . ---. _ | ||
i | i | ||
^ | ^ | ||
$$g" (oNt cowenue we con Efu 'C n" ' wn"d'vN"[Un'r n vio A v eon 0> (_93J LEJ l II NI St T l R1 U 1 UA IF 1 l! 810 j LNJ 7 89 10 at 42 67 da e4 47 48 CAusf CESCRif TION | |||
$$g" (oNt cowenue we con Efu 'C n" ' wn"d'vN"[Un'r n vio A v eon 0> (_93J LEJ l II NI St T l R1 U 1 UA IF 1 l! 810 j LNJ 7 89 10 at 42 67 da e4 47 48 | ; gl The cause is attributed to component failure. The flow transmitter, l g g' which had been transmitting spuriously, needed calibration. 'j i 89 d) | ||
CAusf CESCRif TION | |||
; gl The cause is attributed to component failure. The flow transmitter, l | |||
g g' which had been transmitting spuriously, needed calibration. 'j i 89 d) | |||
EE89L - I 7 ao STATUS %*o 'a of s*t e S T A T US uss ONav DeSCovC aw 0CSCntetnog EED tlJ ! O I 0; 0l [_NA l (,BJ N J 7 0 9 40 82 IJ 44 46 [4 e _A No C8' 8 | EE89L - I 7 ao STATUS %*o 'a of s*t e S T A T US uss ONav DeSCovC aw 0CSCntetnog EED tlJ ! O I 0; 0l [_NA l (,BJ N J 7 0 9 40 82 IJ 44 46 [4 e _A No C8' 8 | ||
* constNs | * constNs atti D os n (As . wryumt or actsvetv toCA tsoN or at LE ASC 7 8 9 to 81 44 45 W PE rnSoNNtt t XPOSURES Nvwve a e v et oc sC a set rom | ||
@ t 010I 01 lej i NA J 7 m9- to t2 IJ 60 Pt nSCNNtt INJustets et SC a** t sow 8 9( huwat 0ie i el ak l NA * - | |||
atti D os n (As . wryumt or actsvetv toCA tsoN or at LE ASC 7 8 9 to 81 44 45 W PE rnSoNNtt t XPOSURES Nvwve a e v et oc sC a set rom | |||
@ t 010I 01 lej i NA J 7 m9- to t2 IJ 60 Pt nSCNNtt INJustets | |||
l 7 46 IJ w Of FSitt CCNSEoutNCES | l 7 46 IJ w Of FSitt CCNSEoutNCES | ||
) | ) | ||
i> [ NA l l 3 4 | i> [ NA l l 3 4 LOSS On DAMAGE to F ACILit Y e vet ot sc a ses eom | ||
@D,t,E \. "^ | @D,t,E \. "^ | ||
. s -- | . s -- | ||
FUS ITY | FUS ITY dl 3 a9 m | ||
I AOuallONAL 8 AC1osts " | |||
dl 3 a9 | @l.9 NA m | ||
l b Il ! | |||
AOuallONAL 8 AC1osts " | |||
@l.9 NA | |||
b Il ! | |||
; ' ,; , - - - - | ; ' ,; , - - - - | ||
.r Y NAMk Jacque Lingeniciter/ Susan Vallade (419) 259-5000, Ext. 251 | .r Y NAMk Jacque Lingeniciter/ Susan Vallade (419) 259-5000, Ext. 251 | ||
( , | ( , | ||
PHONE. | PHONE. | ||
t | t l i 8002040'*] _ | ||
l i 8002040'*] | |||
_ | |||
i t , . - _. | i t , . - _. | ||
m - | |||
' L L M EDISON COMPANY DAVIS-BESSE UNIT ONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR LER NP-33-77-20 DATE OF EVENT: July 7, 1977 FACILITY: Davis-Besse Unit 1 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE: The Containment Sump Level and Flow Monitoring System of the Reactor Coolant System Leakage Detection System, was inoperable. | |||
Condittens Prior to Occurrencei The plant was in Mode 4, with Power (MWI) = 0 and Load (MUE) = 0. | |||
' L L M EDISON COMPANY | |||
DAVIS-BESSE UNIT ONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR LER NP-33-77-20 | |||
DATE OF EVENT: July 7, 1977 FACILITY: Davis-Besse Unit 1 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE: The Containment Sump Level and Flow Monitoring System of the Reactor Coolant System Leakage Detection System, was inoperable. | |||
Condittens Prior to Occurrencei The plant was in Mode 4, with Power (MWI) = 0 | |||
and Load (MUE) = 0. | |||
Description of Occurrence: On July 7, 1977, at 0100 hours, a flow integrating indicator of the Reactor Coolant Detection System registered a flow rate during the Miscellaneous Instrument Shif t Check Surveillance Test. The Containment Normal Sump Pumps, however, were not running. Inspection by station operations personnel revealed that the sump level was normal and there were no leaks. Flow transmitter Foxboro No. FT-2801 was taken out of service for calibration on July 7, 1977 at 0730 hours, placing the station in the Action Statement of Technical Specification 3.4.6.1. | Description of Occurrence: On July 7, 1977, at 0100 hours, a flow integrating indicator of the Reactor Coolant Detection System registered a flow rate during the Miscellaneous Instrument Shif t Check Surveillance Test. The Containment Normal Sump Pumps, however, were not running. Inspection by station operations personnel revealed that the sump level was normal and there were no leaks. Flow transmitter Foxboro No. FT-2801 was taken out of service for calibration on July 7, 1977 at 0730 hours, placing the station in the Action Statement of Technical Specification 3.4.6.1. | ||
( The flow transmittar was calibrated and re-installed on hours. The flow monitoring system was still inoperable, July 8,1977 at 0715 however, since the flow monitoring portion of the Miscellaneous Instrument Shift Check Surveillacce Test (ST 5099.01) did not satisfy t.est conditions until 1115 hours on July 9,1977. | ( The flow transmittar was calibrated and re-installed on hours. The flow monitoring system was still inoperable, July 8,1977 at 0715 however, since the flow monitoring portion of the Miscellaneous Instrument Shift Check Surveillacce Test (ST 5099.01) did not satisfy t.est conditions until 1115 hours on July 9,1977. | ||
Line 111: | Line 66: | ||
The flow monitoring system failed to pass the Miscellaneous Instrument Shift Check Surveillance Test (ST 5099.01), however,because the instrument valves had been inadvertently left closed, allowing no pressure differential to reach the transmitter. The flow monitoring system passed ST 5099.01 on July 9, 1977 at 1115 hours removing the station from the Action Statement of Technical Specifi-cation 3.4.6.1 Analysis of Occurrence: There was no danger to the health and safety of the public or station personnel. In the event of a reactor coolant system leakage, leakage would have been detected by two other operable systems, the Containment Atmosphere Particulate Radioactivity Monitoring System and the Containment Atmos-phere Gaseous Radioactivity Monitoring System. Containment sump level monitoring was still available. | The flow monitoring system failed to pass the Miscellaneous Instrument Shift Check Surveillance Test (ST 5099.01), however,because the instrument valves had been inadvertently left closed, allowing no pressure differential to reach the transmitter. The flow monitoring system passed ST 5099.01 on July 9, 1977 at 1115 hours removing the station from the Action Statement of Technical Specifi-cation 3.4.6.1 Analysis of Occurrence: There was no danger to the health and safety of the public or station personnel. In the event of a reactor coolant system leakage, leakage would have been detected by two other operable systems, the Containment Atmosphere Particulate Radioactivity Monitoring System and the Containment Atmos-phere Gaseous Radioactivity Monitoring System. Containment sump level monitoring was still available. | ||
O V . . . _ | O V . . . _ | ||
-m | -m m , | ||
m , | |||
, TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY DAVIS-BESSE UNIT ONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR LER NP-33-77-20 PAGE 2 Corrective Action: To prevent recurrence, the Instrument and Control Engineer will specify on Maintenance Work Orders that valves are to be lined up when . | , TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY DAVIS-BESSE UNIT ONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR LER NP-33-77-20 PAGE 2 Corrective Action: To prevent recurrence, the Instrument and Control Engineer will specify on Maintenance Work Orders that valves are to be lined up when . | ||
flow transmitters are returned to service. | flow transmitters are returned to service. | ||
Line 130: | Line 73: | ||
Failure Data: No previous similar events have occurred. | Failure Data: No previous similar events have occurred. | ||
s. | s. | ||
:V _ | :V _ | ||
..}} | ..}} |
Revision as of 00:14, 1 February 2020
ML19326A570 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Davis Besse |
Issue date: | 08/03/1977 |
From: | Lingenfelter J, Vallade S TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML19326A525 | List: |
References | |
LER-RO-770803-01, LER-RO-770803-1, NUDOCS 8002040744 | |
Download: ML19326A570 (3) | |
Text
_
~
~
g- ..
' ~
LICENS' E EVENT REPORT N
Cournot stoC=. t
- 1. L.I I I l_.I, awt teCENst Nuwet a tvet [v et
@]9l0lliiDl bis 1ljla ' 15l0 j fj - J 01 0 1 "' ?li' I -f 0aa1 3J 2, l g lj lj l 11 i 30 310 3{ a C A t t s.cu' !'T t e'staN OoCat
- wuwet n ( ML N O (nA t t A(Pose f Q A f t Iolil Cou i- 1 I I LI O f .- 1 034 1 ! ! 6J [01710171717I .i dl8 1 01 3 i 7j7i P' t i>- sa 'W [FL1 si(0tSi c,a r,9 s. is d
~
t vtut oe scruarioN g ; The Containment Sump Level and Flow Monitoring System, of tihe Reactorj g' Coolant System Leakage Detection System, was inoperable. AIflow trans- g
) 49 - M g
a o mitter in the flow monitoring system was removed for calibration. This ;
n
@TJ l is not a repetitive occurrence. CG-33-77-20) ;
3 89 10
@ L . ---. _
i
^
$$g" (oNt cowenue we con Efu 'C n" ' wn"d'vN"[Un'r n vio A v eon 0> (_93J LEJ l II NI St T l R1 U 1 UA IF 1 l! 810 j LNJ 7 89 10 at 42 67 da e4 47 48 CAusf CESCRif TION
- gl The cause is attributed to component failure. The flow transmitter, l g g' which had been transmitting spuriously, needed calibration. 'j i 89 d)
EE89L - I 7 ao STATUS %*o 'a of s*t e S T A T US uss ONav DeSCovC aw 0CSCntetnog EED tlJ ! O I 0; 0l [_NA l (,BJ N J 7 0 9 40 82 IJ 44 46 [4 e _A No C8' 8
- constNs atti D os n (As . wryumt or actsvetv toCA tsoN or at LE ASC 7 8 9 to 81 44 45 W PE rnSoNNtt t XPOSURES Nvwve a e v et oc sC a set rom
@ t 010I 01 lej i NA J 7 m9- to t2 IJ 60 Pt nSCNNtt INJustets et SC a** t sow 8 9( huwat 0ie i el ak l NA * -
l 7 46 IJ w Of FSitt CCNSEoutNCES
)
i> [ NA l l 3 4 LOSS On DAMAGE to F ACILit Y e vet ot sc a ses eom
@D,t,E \. "^
. s --
FUS ITY dl 3 a9 m
I AOuallONAL 8 AC1osts "
@l.9 NA m
l b Il !
- ' ,; , - - - -
.r Y NAMk Jacque Lingeniciter/ Susan Vallade (419) 259-5000, Ext. 251
( ,
PHONE.
t l i 8002040'*] _
i t , . - _.
m -
' L L M EDISON COMPANY DAVIS-BESSE UNIT ONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR LER NP-33-77-20 DATE OF EVENT: July 7, 1977 FACILITY: Davis-Besse Unit 1 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE: The Containment Sump Level and Flow Monitoring System of the Reactor Coolant System Leakage Detection System, was inoperable.
Condittens Prior to Occurrencei The plant was in Mode 4, with Power (MWI) = 0 and Load (MUE) = 0.
Description of Occurrence: On July 7, 1977, at 0100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br />, a flow integrating indicator of the Reactor Coolant Detection System registered a flow rate during the Miscellaneous Instrument Shif t Check Surveillance Test. The Containment Normal Sump Pumps, however, were not running. Inspection by station operations personnel revealed that the sump level was normal and there were no leaks. Flow transmitter Foxboro No. FT-2801 was taken out of service for calibration on July 7, 1977 at 0730 hours0.00845 days <br />0.203 hours <br />0.00121 weeks <br />2.77765e-4 months <br />, placing the station in the Action Statement of Technical Specification 3.4.6.1.
( The flow transmittar was calibrated and re-installed on hours. The flow monitoring system was still inoperable, July 8,1977 at 0715 however, since the flow monitoring portion of the Miscellaneous Instrument Shift Check Surveillacce Test (ST 5099.01) did not satisfy t.est conditions until 1115 hours on July 9,1977.
Designation of Apparent Cause of Occurrence: The cause of the occurrence is attributed to both instrument failure and personnel error. The transmitter had been transmitting spuriously,necessic2 ting its removal for calibration. It was found to be within tolerances and re-installed on July 8, 1977 at 0715 hours0.00828 days <br />0.199 hours <br />0.00118 weeks <br />2.720575e-4 months <br />.
The flow monitoring system failed to pass the Miscellaneous Instrument Shift Check Surveillance Test (ST 5099.01), however,because the instrument valves had been inadvertently left closed, allowing no pressure differential to reach the transmitter. The flow monitoring system passed ST 5099.01 on July 9, 1977 at 1115 hours0.0129 days <br />0.31 hours <br />0.00184 weeks <br />4.242575e-4 months <br /> removing the station from the Action Statement of Technical Specifi-cation 3.4.6.1 Analysis of Occurrence: There was no danger to the health and safety of the public or station personnel. In the event of a reactor coolant system leakage, leakage would have been detected by two other operable systems, the Containment Atmosphere Particulate Radioactivity Monitoring System and the Containment Atmos-phere Gaseous Radioactivity Monitoring System. Containment sump level monitoring was still available.
O V . . . _
-m m ,
, TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY DAVIS-BESSE UNIT ONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR LER NP-33-77-20 PAGE 2 Corrective Action: To prevent recurrence, the Instrument and Control Engineer will specify on Maintenance Work Orders that valves are to be lined up when .
flow transmitters are returned to service.
The Miscellaneous Instrument Shift Check Surveillance Test, through which this flow transmitter was found to be defective, should pinpoint any future devia-tions in instrumentation in the Containment Normal Sump Pump and Flow Monitoring System. ,
Failure Data: No previous similar events have occurred.
s.
- V _
..