IR 05000311/2019301: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/14/2019
| issue date = 02/14/2019
| title = Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000272 and 05000311/2019301
| title = Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000272 and 05000311/2019301
| author name = Jackson D E
| author name = Jackson D
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OB
| addressee name = Sena P P
| addressee name = Sena P
| addressee affiliation = PSEG Nuclear, LLC
| addressee affiliation = PSEG Nuclear, LLC
| docket = 05000272, 05000311
| docket = 05000272, 05000311
Line 20: Line 20:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 2100 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406
{{#Wiki_filter:February 14, 2019
-2713 February 14, 2019 Mr. Peter P. Sena, III Chief Nuclear Officer PSEG Nuclear LLC
- N09 P. O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038


SUBJECT: SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION
==SUBJECT:==
- INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000 272 AND 05000 311/20 1 9 30 1
SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000272 AND 05000311/2019301


==Dear Mr. Sena:==
==Dear Mr. Sena:==
On January 18 , 201 9, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station
On January 18, 2019, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station. The enclosed examination report documents the examination results, which were discussed on February 12, 2019, with Mr. Glenn Marshall, Initial License Operator Training Group Lead, and others of your staff.
. The enclosed examination report documents the examination results, which were discussed on February 12, 201 9, with Mr. Glenn Marshall, Initial License Operator Training Group Lead , and others of your staff.


The examination included the evaluation of four applicant s for reactor operator license s and five applicant s for instant senior reactor operator license s. The written and operating examinations were developed using NUREG
The examination included the evaluation of four applicants for reactor operator licenses and five applicants for instant senior reactor operator licenses. The written and operating examinations were developed using NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 11. The license examiners determined that all of the applicants satisfied the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 55, and the appropriate licenses were issued on February 12, 2019.
-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,"
Revision 1 1. The license examiners determined that all of the applicant s satisfied the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 55, and the appropriate license s were issued on February 12, 201 9. No findings were identified during this examination.


This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
No findings were identified during this examination.
-rm/adams.html and the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding."


Sincerely,/RA/ Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No s. 50-272 and 50-311 License No s. DPR-70 and DPR-75  
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
 
Sincerely,
/RA/
Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
Examination Report 05000 272 and 05000 311/20 1 9 30 1 cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ
Examination Report 05000272 and 05000311/2019301
 
REGION I==
Dockets: 50-272 and 50-311 Licenses: DPR-70 and DPR-75 Report: 05000272 and 05000311/2019301 Enterprise L-2019-OLL-0010 Identifier:
Licensee: PSEG Nuclear LLC PSEG Facility: Salem Nuclear Generating Station Location: Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 Dates: January 14 - 18, 2019 (Operating Test Administration)
January 22, 2019 (Written Examination Administration)
January 26, 2019 (Licensee Submitted Post Exam Package)
January 31, 2019 (NRC Examination Grading)
February 12, 2019 (Licenses Issued)
Examiners: D. Silk, Chief Examiner, Operations Branch T. Fish, Senior Operations Engineer T. Hedigan, Operations Engineer P. Ott, Operations Engineer Approved By: Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure
 
=SUMMARY=
ER 05000272 and 05000311/2019301; 01/14/2019 - 01/18/2019; Salem Nuclear Generating
 
Station; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report.
 
Four NRC examiners evaluated the competency of four reactor operator applicants and five applicants for instant senior reactor operator licenses at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station.
 
The facility licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 11. The NRC examiners administered the operating tests on January 14 - 18, 2019. The written examination was administered by the facility on January 22, 2019. The NRC examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 55 and the appropriate licenses were issued on February 12, 2019.


ML19045A467 SUNSI Review Non-Sensitive Sensitive Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available OFFICE RI/DRS RI/DRS NAME DSilk DEJackson DATE 2/13/1 9 2/14/1 9 1 Enclosure EXAMINATION REPORT U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I Docket s: 50-272 and 50
No findings were identified.
-311 License s: DPR-70 and DPR
-75 Report: 05000 272 and 05000 311/20 1 9 30 1 Enterprise Identifier
: L-2019-OLL-0010 Licensee: PSEG Nuclear LLC PSEG Facility: Salem Nuclear Generating Station Location: Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 Dates: January 14
- 18, 2019 (Operating Test Administration)
January 2 2, 201 9 (Written Examination Administration)
January 26, 201 9 (Licensee Submitted Post Exam Package
) January 31, 201 9 (NRC Examination Grading)
February 12, 201 9 (Licenses Issued
) Examiners: D. Silk, Chief Examiner, Operations Branch T. Fish , Senior Operations Engineer T. Hedigan, Operations Engineer P. Ott, Operations Engineer Approved By:
Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety


2 SUMMARY ER 05000 272 and 05000 311/201 9 30 1; 0 1/1 4/201 9 - 01/18/201 9; Salem Nuclear Generating Station; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report
=REPORT DETAILS=
. Four NRC examiners evaluated the competency of four reactor operator applicants and five applicant s for instant senior reactor operator license s at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station. The facility licensee developed the examinations using NUREG
-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors,"
Revision 1 1. The NRC examiner s administered the operating tests on January 14
- 18, 201 9. The written examination was administered by the facility on January 2 2, 201 9. The NRC examiner s determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 55 and the appropriate licenses were issued on February 12, 2019. No findings were identified.


3 REPORT DETAILS 4. OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)==
4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)
{{a|4OA5}}
.1 License Applications a. Scope The examiners reviewed the license applications submitted by the facility licensee to ensure that each applicant satisfied the relevant license eligibility requirements. The applications were submitted on NRC Form 398, "Personal Qualification Statement," and NRC Form 396, "Certification of Medical Examination by Facility Licensee." Th e audit also focused on the applicants
==4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)==
' experience and control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.


b. Findings No findings were identified.
===.1 License Applications===


.2 Operator Knowledge and Performance a. Examination Scope On January 22, 201 9 , the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all nine applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on January 25, 201 9. The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating examination to the applicants on January 1 4 - 18, 201 9. The four applicant s seeking a reactor operator license participated in three dynamic simulator scenarios, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of 11 system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of four tasks.
====a. Scope====
The examiners reviewed the license applications submitted by the facility licensee to ensure that each applicant satisfied the relevant license eligibility requirements. The applications were submitted on NRC Form 398, Personal Qualification Statement, and NRC Form 396, Certification of Medical Examination by Facility Licensee. The audit also focused on the applicants experience and control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.


The five applicants seeking an instant senior reactor operator license participated in three dynamic simulator scenario s, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of ten system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of five tasks. b. Findings All of the applicants passed all parts of the examination. For the written examinations, the overall examination average score was 8 9.9 percent and ranged from 84.0 to 9 5.0 percent. The average scores for the reactor operator and senior reactor operator exams were 87.3 and 92.0 percent, respectively.
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.


The text of the examination questions and the operating test may be accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in Attachment 1. In accordance with current NRC policy, the release of th e examination material in ADAMS to the public will be delayed for approximately two years from the date of this report.
===.2 Operator Knowledge and Performance===


The NRC examiners completed the final grading of the written examination on January 31, 201 9, and conducted a review of each missed question to determine the 4 accuracy and validity of the examination questions.
====a. Examination Scope====
On January 22, 2019, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all nine applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on January 25, 2019.


Chapter ES
The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating examination to the applicants on January 14 - 18, 2019. The four applicants seeking a reactor operator license participated in three dynamic simulator scenarios, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of 11 system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of four tasks. The five applicants seeking an instant senior reactor operator license participated in three dynamic simulator scenarios, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of ten system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of five tasks.
-403 and Form ES-403-1 of NUREG 1021 require the licensee to analyze the validity of any written examination questions that were missed by half or more of the applicants. The licensee conducted this performance analysis for four questions that met these criteria and submitted the analysis to the chief examiner
. The licensee did not submit any post-examination comments.


.3 Initial Licensing Examination Development a. Examination Scope The facility licensee developed the examinations in accordance with NUREG
====b. Findings====
-1021, Revision 1 1. All licensee facility training and operations staff involved in examination preparation and validation were listed on a security agreement. The NRC provided the facility licensee with the written exam outline on May 3 , 201 8. The facility licensee submitted operating examination outlines on July 24 , 201 8. The chief examiner reviewed the outlines against the requirements of NUREG
All of the applicants passed all parts of the examination. For the written examinations, the overall examination average score was 89.9 percent and ranged from 84.0 to 95.0 percent. The average scores for the reactor operator and senior reactor operator exams were 87.3 and 92.0 percent, respectively. The text of the examination questions and the operating test may be accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in Attachment 1. In accordance with current NRC policy, the release of the examination material in ADAMS to the public will be delayed for approximately two years from the date of this report.
-1021, and provided comments to the licensee. The facility licensee submitted the draft examination package on November 7
 
, 201 8. The chief examiner reviewed the draft examination package against the requirements of NUREG
The NRC examiners completed the final grading of the written examination on January 31, 2019, and conducted a review of each missed question to determine the accuracy and validity of the examination questions. Chapter ES-403 and Form ES-403-1 of NUREG 1021 require the licensee to analyze the validity of any written examination questions that were missed by half or more of the applicants. The licensee conducted this performance analysis for four questions that met these criteria and submitted the analysis to the chief examiner. The licensee did not submit any post-examination comments.
-1021, and provided comments to the licensee
 
. The NRC conducted an onsite validation of the operating examinations and provided further comments during the week of November 26, 201 8. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution for the operating test on December 14, 2018, and completed resolution of the written examination comments on January 4, 201 9. b. Findings The NRC approved the initial examination outline and advised the licensee to proceed with the operating examination development.
===.3 Initial Licensing Examination Development===
 
====a. Examination Scope====
The facility licensee developed the examinations in accordance with NUREG-1021, Revision 11. All licensee facility training and operations staff involved in examination preparation and validation were listed on a security agreement. The NRC provided the facility licensee with the written exam outline on May 3, 2018. The facility licensee submitted operating examination outlines on July 24, 2018. The chief examiner reviewed the outlines against the requirements of NUREG-1021, and provided comments to the licensee. The facility licensee submitted the draft examination package on November 7, 2018. The chief examiner reviewed the draft examination package against the requirements of NUREG-1021, and provided comments to the licensee. The NRC conducted an onsite validation of the operating examinations and provided further comments during the week of November 26, 2018. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution for the operating test on December 14, 2018, and completed resolution of the written examination comments on January 4, 2019.
 
====b. Findings====
The NRC approved the initial examination outline and advised the licensee to proceed with the operating examination development.


The examiners determined that the written and operating examinations initially submitted by the licensee were within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.
The examiners determined that the written and operating examinations initially submitted by the licensee were within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.
Line 91: Line 99:
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.


.4 Simulation Facility Performance a. Examination Scope The examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during the examination validation and administration weeks. b. Findings No findings were identified.
===.4 Simulation Facility Performance===
 
====a. Examination Scope====
The examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during the       examination validation and administration weeks.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.
 
===.5 Examination Security===
 
====a. Examination Scope====
The examiners reviewed the examination security protocols for this examination effort during both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with NUREG-1021, Revision 11, requirements. Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.


5 .5 Examination Security a. Examination Scope The examiners reviewed the examination security protocols for this examination effort during both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with NUREG
====b. Findings====
-1021, Revision 1 1 , requirements. Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel. b. Findings No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit==


4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit The chief examiner presented the examination results to Mr. G. Marshall , Initial License Operato r Training Group Lead
The chief examiner presented the examination results to Mr. G. Marshall, Initial License Operator Training Group Lead, and other members of the licensee on February 12, 2019. The licensee acknowledged the findings presented.
, and other members of the licensee on February 12 , 201 9. The licensee acknowledged the findings presented.


The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination as proprietary.
The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination as proprietary.


===Attachments:===
s:
1. Supplementary Information
 
===1. Supplementary Information===
 
=SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION=
 
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
 
===Licensee Personnel===
: [[contact::D. McHugh]], Operations Training Manager
: [[contact::G. Marshall]], Initial Operator Training Group Lead
: [[contact::R. Chan]], Exam Developer
: [[contact::S. Dimeler]], Exam Developer
 
==ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
 
===Opened===
 
NONE
 
===Closed===
 
NONE
 
===Discussed===
 
NONE
 
==ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED==


6 SUPPLEMENTA RY INFORMATION KEY POINTS OF CONTACT Licensee Personnel D. McHugh, Operations Training Manager G. Marshall, Initial Operator Training Group Lead R. Chan, Exam Developer S. Dimeler, Exam Developer ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED Opened NONE Closed NONE Discussed NONE ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED Accession No. ML19036A821 - FINAL-Written Exam (Note: In accordance with current NRC policy, the release of this written examination in ADAMS to the public will be delayed for two years.) Accession No. ML19036A8 23 - FINAL-Operating Exam (Note: In accordance with current NRC policy, the release of this operating examination in ADAMS to the public will be delayed for two years.)
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 14:50, 18 December 2019

Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000272 and 05000311/2019301
ML19045A467
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 02/14/2019
From: Diane Jackson
Operations Branch I
To: Sena P
Public Service Enterprise Group
Shared Package
ML18081A982 List:
References
50-272/19-301, 50-311/19-301 50-272/OL-19, 50-311/OL-19
Download: ML19045A467 (9)


Text

February 14, 2019

SUBJECT:

SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000272 AND 05000311/2019301

Dear Mr. Sena:

On January 18, 2019, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station. The enclosed examination report documents the examination results, which were discussed on February 12, 2019, with Mr. Glenn Marshall, Initial License Operator Training Group Lead, and others of your staff.

The examination included the evaluation of four applicants for reactor operator licenses and five applicants for instant senior reactor operator licenses. The written and operating examinations were developed using NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 11. The license examiners determined that all of the applicants satisfied the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 55, and the appropriate licenses were issued on February 12, 2019.

No findings were identified during this examination.

This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311 License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75

Enclosure:

Examination Report 05000272 and 05000311/2019301

REGION I==

Dockets: 50-272 and 50-311 Licenses: DPR-70 and DPR-75 Report: 05000272 and 05000311/2019301 Enterprise L-2019-OLL-0010 Identifier:

Licensee: PSEG Nuclear LLC PSEG Facility: Salem Nuclear Generating Station Location: Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 Dates: January 14 - 18, 2019 (Operating Test Administration)

January 22, 2019 (Written Examination Administration)

January 26, 2019 (Licensee Submitted Post Exam Package)

January 31, 2019 (NRC Examination Grading)

February 12, 2019 (Licenses Issued)

Examiners: D. Silk, Chief Examiner, Operations Branch T. Fish, Senior Operations Engineer T. Hedigan, Operations Engineer P. Ott, Operations Engineer Approved By: Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure

SUMMARY

ER 05000272 and 05000311/2019301; 01/14/2019 - 01/18/2019; Salem Nuclear Generating

Station; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report.

Four NRC examiners evaluated the competency of four reactor operator applicants and five applicants for instant senior reactor operator licenses at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station.

The facility licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 11. The NRC examiners administered the operating tests on January 14 - 18, 2019. The written examination was administered by the facility on January 22, 2019. The NRC examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 55 and the appropriate licenses were issued on February 12, 2019.

No findings were identified.

REPORT DETAILS

OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)

.1 License Applications

a. Scope

The examiners reviewed the license applications submitted by the facility licensee to ensure that each applicant satisfied the relevant license eligibility requirements. The applications were submitted on NRC Form 398, Personal Qualification Statement, and NRC Form 396, Certification of Medical Examination by Facility Licensee. The audit also focused on the applicants experience and control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Operator Knowledge and Performance

a. Examination Scope

On January 22, 2019, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all nine applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on January 25, 2019.

The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating examination to the applicants on January 14 - 18, 2019. The four applicants seeking a reactor operator license participated in three dynamic simulator scenarios, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of 11 system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of four tasks. The five applicants seeking an instant senior reactor operator license participated in three dynamic simulator scenarios, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of ten system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of five tasks.

b. Findings

All of the applicants passed all parts of the examination. For the written examinations, the overall examination average score was 89.9 percent and ranged from 84.0 to 95.0 percent. The average scores for the reactor operator and senior reactor operator exams were 87.3 and 92.0 percent, respectively. The text of the examination questions and the operating test may be accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in Attachment 1. In accordance with current NRC policy, the release of the examination material in ADAMS to the public will be delayed for approximately two years from the date of this report.

The NRC examiners completed the final grading of the written examination on January 31, 2019, and conducted a review of each missed question to determine the accuracy and validity of the examination questions. Chapter ES-403 and Form ES-403-1 of NUREG 1021 require the licensee to analyze the validity of any written examination questions that were missed by half or more of the applicants. The licensee conducted this performance analysis for four questions that met these criteria and submitted the analysis to the chief examiner. The licensee did not submit any post-examination comments.

.3 Initial Licensing Examination Development

a. Examination Scope

The facility licensee developed the examinations in accordance with NUREG-1021, Revision 11. All licensee facility training and operations staff involved in examination preparation and validation were listed on a security agreement. The NRC provided the facility licensee with the written exam outline on May 3, 2018. The facility licensee submitted operating examination outlines on July 24, 2018. The chief examiner reviewed the outlines against the requirements of NUREG-1021, and provided comments to the licensee. The facility licensee submitted the draft examination package on November 7, 2018. The chief examiner reviewed the draft examination package against the requirements of NUREG-1021, and provided comments to the licensee. The NRC conducted an onsite validation of the operating examinations and provided further comments during the week of November 26, 2018. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution for the operating test on December 14, 2018, and completed resolution of the written examination comments on January 4, 2019.

b. Findings

The NRC approved the initial examination outline and advised the licensee to proceed with the operating examination development.

The examiners determined that the written and operating examinations initially submitted by the licensee were within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.

No findings were identified.

.4 Simulation Facility Performance

a. Examination Scope

The examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during the examination validation and administration weeks.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.5 Examination Security

a. Examination Scope

The examiners reviewed the examination security protocols for this examination effort during both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with NUREG-1021, Revision 11, requirements. Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

The chief examiner presented the examination results to Mr. G. Marshall, Initial License Operator Training Group Lead, and other members of the licensee on February 12, 2019. The licensee acknowledged the findings presented.

The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination as proprietary.

s:

1. Supplementary Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

D. McHugh, Operations Training Manager
G. Marshall, Initial Operator Training Group Lead
R. Chan, Exam Developer
S. Dimeler, Exam Developer

ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

Opened

NONE

Closed

NONE

Discussed

NONE

ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED