ML11294A153: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML11294A153
| number = ML11294A153
| issue date = 09/29/2011
| issue date = 09/29/2011
| title = 2011/09/29 Davis-Besse Lr - FW: Davis Besse OI and Ci Tables
| title = Lr - FW: Davis Besse OI and Ci Tables
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 Davis-BesseNPEm Resource From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 4:50 PM To: custerc@firstenergycorp.com Cc: 'dorts@firstenergycorp.com'; Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource
{{#Wiki_filter:Davis-BesseNPEm Resource From:                         CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent:                         Thursday, September 29, 2011 4:50 PM To:                           custerc@firstenergycorp.com Cc:                           'dorts@firstenergycorp.com'; Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FW: Davis Besse OI and CI tables Importance:
FW: Davis Besse OI and CI tables Importance:                   High Cliff:
High Cliff:
The below tables list Davis Besse OI and CI. The tables are different from what I sent yesterday as it reflects my discussions with DLR BCs. We have 20 OI and 2 CI.
The below tables list Davis Besse OI and CI. The tables are different from what I sent yesterday as it reflects my discussions with DLR BCs. We have 20 OI and 2 CI.
I'll give you a call tomorrow to be sure that we're consistent with what you understand are the OI/CI for DB.  
Ill give you a call tomorrow to be sure that were consistent with what you understand are the OI/CI for DB.
: Regards, Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov RASB Reviewers        TRP  CI/OI                                                RAI Brogers                CI                                                    RAI 2.1-3 Lehman/Istar            OI 3.0.3.1.10-1                                      RAI B.2.22-5 (B.2.22-1)
Lehman/Istar            OI 3.0.3.1.10-2                                      RAI B.2.22-6 (B.2.22-2) 1


RegardsSamuel Cuadrado de Jesús Project Manager Projects Branch 1  
Lehman/Istar        OI 3.0.3.1.10-4                                  RAI B.2.22-7 (B.2.22-4)
RAI B.2.39-9 (B.2.39-Naus/Lehman      46 OI 3.0.3.2.15-1                                  1)
B.2.39-11 (B.2.39-Naus/Lehman      46 OI 3.0.3.2.15-3                                  3)
Naus/Lehman      46 OI 3.0.3.2.16-1                                  RAI B.2.40-1(B.2.40-2)
ABuford/ASheikh  63 OI 4.6-1                                        RAI 4.6-1 RARB Reviewers      TRP  CI/OI        RAI                      Notes regarding how FENOC plans to address the review and incorporation of operating experience into the license MHomiack              OI            RAI B1.4-1                renewal aging management programs applicants first response do not clearly address information regarding: (1) the functional groups, (2) the link relationships, or (3) the inspection method, including the frequency, specified for the CSA vent valve body and plenum cylinder reinforcing plate.
SMin and the primary reviewer (Trillo) will determine if the applicant 9/16/2011 response is acceptable by Trillo/Min/Yee 73    OI 3.1.2.2-1  RAI 3.1.2.2-3 (3.1.2.2-2) 9/30/2011 We're waiting for the applicant response on SG tube SMin            101  OI            RAI 3.1.2.2.16-1         to tubsheet welds by 10/22/2011 2


Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone:  301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov RASB Reviewers TRP CI/OI RAI Brogers  CI RAI 2.1-3 Lehman/Istar  OI 3.0.3.1.10-1                                                  RAI B.2.22-5 (B.2.22-1)                                                           Lehman/Istar  OI 3.0.3.1.10-2                                                   RAI B.2.22-6 (B.2.22-2) 2Lehman/Istar  OI 3.0.3.1.10-4 RAI B.2.22-7 (B.2.22-4) Naus/Lehman 46 OI 3.0.3.2.15-1                                                                                                      RAI B.2.39-9 (B.2.39-1)                                                                                                  Naus/Lehman 46 OI 3.0.3.2.15-3                                                                                                     B.2.39-11 (B.2.39-3)                                                                                                        Naus/Lehman 46 OI 3.0.3.2.16-1 RAI B.2.40-1(B.2.40-2)  ABuford/ASheikh 63 OI 4.6-1 RAI 4.6-1
Oyee/CNg/Medoff    OI 4.3.2.3.2-1        RAI 4.3.2.3.2-1                         Class 1 valves. This will very likely end as an OI Waiting for applicant suplement letter adding steel crane fatigue analysis as a new TLAA section. the applicant will provide new section by the end of September. On Yee already agreed to provide the SER input soon (within a week) after we receive the new On Yee              CI                    steel crane, fatigue analysis TLAA      TLAA section.
ASME Code Case N-481 evaluation. Telecom 6/16 and 7/15/2011-On 8/10/11 letter they need to supplement their LRA to address the timedependent J-integral analysis and TLAA(i). Revised Response received 8/17/2011. Telecon held 9/16/2011 Ching/Medoff        OI 4.1-1              RAI 4.1-2                               applicant will supplement response to RAI RAPB Reviewers      TRP      CI/OI                  RAI                                      Notes
                                                                                        #1 In a teleconference dated August 22, 2011 the applicant stated that the item was intended to be deleted but documentation had not yet been provided Pending the applicants changes to LRA Table 3.2.2-2, the staffs review of this item is not complete and will be tracked as Confirmatory item XXX. Supplemental response received 9/16/2011.
Probably closed I need to check with JWise.          #2 Please confirm that these line items are subject to a moist air (external) environment and submit a correction letter stating that, as appropriate. Once the environment has been confirmed for these line items, please restate the AMP to be assigned to these line items related to the applicant's response for 3.2.2.2.3.6-2. The applicant will confirm the environment in an upcoming response letter. Should be closed easily. In 9/16/2011 response letter the LRA was revised to define the moist air (internal)
RAI 3.2.2.2.3.6-2 9/21/2011 e-mail      environment to encompass both the air-water on Supplemental RAI response for        interface and the air environment above the 3.2.2.2.3.6-2. Teleconference to be      interface, we'll discuss this in a Telecon @
Jklos          33      CI 3.2.2.2.3.6-2       scheduled 9/29/2011.                     9/29/2011 NRC reviewer was concerned that not all applicable aging effects are identified for the fire water storage tank heat exchanger tubes. FENOC stated that the consequences of tube failure do not directly challenge the function of the tank FENOC will review the issue to determine whether the fire water storage tank heat exchanger should be removed from scope.Waiting for RAI supplement by 9/30/2011.
Issue can be easily closed if they remove the wst from Klos/Kichline  33      OI 3.3.2.14-1         RAI 3.3.2.14-1                           scope as they plan to.
3


RARB Reviewers TRP CI/OI RAI Notes MHomiack  OI RAI B1.4-1 regarding how FENOC plans to address the review and incorporation of operating experience into the license renewal aging management programs Trillo/Min/Yee 73 OI 3.1.2.2-1 RAI 3.1.2.2-3 (3.1.2.2-2) applicant's first response do not clearly  address information regarding: (1) the functional groups, (2) the link relationships, or (3) the inspection method, including the frequency, specified for  the CSA vent valve body and plenum cylinder reinforcing plate. SMin and the primary reviewer (Trillo) will determine if the applicant 9/16/2011 response is acceptable by 9/30/2011 SMin 101 OI  RAI 3.1.2.2.16-1 We're waiting for the applicant response on SG tube to tubsheet welds by 10/22/2011 3Oyee/CNg/Medoff   OI 4.3.2.3.2-1 RAI 4.3.2.3.2-1 Class 1 valves. This will very likely end as an OI On Yee  CI steel crane, fatigue analysis TLAA  Waiting for applicant suplement letter adding steel crane fatigue analysis as a new TLAA section. the applicant will provide new section by the end of September. On Yee already agreed to provide the SER input soon (within a week) after we receive the new TLAA section. Ching/Medoff  OI 4.1-1 RAI 4.1-2 ASME Code Case N-481 evaluation. Telecom 6/16 and 7/15/2011-On 8/10/11 letter they need to supplement their LRA to address the timedependent J-integral analysis and TLAA(i). Revised Response received 8/17/2011. Telecon held 9/16/2011 applicant will supplement response to RAI
letdown cooler replacement frequency. Follow-up JGavula                    OI           RAI 2.3.3.18-4(RAI 2.3.3.18-3)        RAI issued 9/22/2011 CVIB and CSGB (DCI)
Reviewers              TRP  CI/OI                        RAI                                              Notes Table 3.1.2-3 RPV flange leak detection (Nickel Alloy) missing item. Will receive supplemental response by 9/30/2011. Should be closed once we JPoehler/CSydnor/Ganesh      OI                          (9/13/2011 Teleconference)                        receive the letter.
(Telecon held on 9/13/2011) RAIs will be issued early next week CSydnor                66   OI 4.7.3-1                   RAI 4.7.3-1                                       (Oct 3).
RAIs will be issued early CSydnor                67  OI 4.7.4-1                  RAI 4.7.4-1                                      next week (Oct 3).
OI 4.7.5.2-2                RAI 4.7.5.2-                                     SG shell flaw 2                                                 evaluations. RAIs will be issued early next week (Oct 3).
Sydnor                  68 Explain why copper alloy with less than 15 percent zinc components exposed to lubricating oil have no aging effects requiring management or provide an appropriate AMP to manage loss of material. RAI sent Mkichline/AObodoako          OI                          RAI 3.3.2.2.10.4-1                                9/22/2011 Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov 4


RAPB Reviewers TRP CI/OI RAI Notes Jklos 33 CI 3.2.2.2.3.6-2 RAI 3.2.2.2.3.6-2  9/21/2011 e-mail on Supplemental RAI response for 3.2.2.2.3.6-2. Teleconference to be scheduled 9/29/2011.  #1 In a teleconference dated August 22, 2011 the applicant stated that the item was intended to be deleted but documentation had not yet been provided  Pending the applicant's changes to LRA Table 3.2.2-2, the staff's review of this item is not complete and will be tracked as Confirmatory item XXX. Supplemental response received 9/16/2011. Probably closed I need to check with JWise.              #2 Please confirm that these line items are subject to a moist air (external) environment and submit a correction letter stating that, as appropriate. Once the environment has been confirmed for these line items, please restate the AMP to be assigned to these line items related to the applicant's response for 3.2.2.2.3.6-2. The applicant will confirm the environment in an upcoming response letter. Should be closed easily. In 9/16/2011 response letter the LRA was revised to define the moist air (internal) environment to encompass both the air-water interface and the air environment above the interface, we'll discuss this in a Telecon @ 9/29/2011                      Klos/Kichline 33 OI 3.3.2.14-1 RAI 3.3.2.14-1  NRC reviewer was concerned that not all applicable aging effects are identified for the fire water storage tank heat exchanger tubes. FENOC stated that the consequences of tube failure do not directly challenge the function of the tank FENOC will review the issue to determine whether the fire water storage tank heat exchanger should be removed from scope.Waiting for RAI supplement by 9/30/2011. Issue can be easily closed if they remove the wst from scope as they plan to.
Hearing Identifier:     Davis_BesseLicenseRenewal_Saf_NonPublic Email Number:           1716 Mail Envelope Properties     (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0805095FF2A)
4JGavula  OI RAI 2.3.3.18-4(RAI 2.3.3.18-3)  letdown cooler replacement frequency. Follow-up RAI issued 9/22/2011
 
CVIB and CSGB (DCI) Reviewers TRP CI/OI RAI Notes JPoehler/CSydnor/Ganesh OI (9/13/2011 Teleconference) Table 3.1.2-3 RPV flange leak detection (Nickel Alloy) missing item. Will receive supplemental response by 9/30/2011. Should be closed once we receive the letter. CSydnor 66 OI 4.7.3-1 RAI 4.7.3-1 (Telecon held on 9/13/2011) RAIs will be issued early next week (Oct 3). CSydnor 67 OI 4.7.4-1 RAI 4.7.4-1 RAIs will be issued early next week (Oct 3). Sydnor 68 OI 4.7.5.2-2                                                        RAI 4.7.5.2-2 SG shell flaw evaluations. RAIs will be issued early next week  (Oct 3). Mkichline/AObodoako  OI RAI 3.3.2.2.10.4-1 Explain why copper alloy with less than 15
 
percent zinc components exposed to lubricating oil have
 
no aging effects requiring management or provide an appropriate AMP to
 
manage loss of material. RAI sent 9/22/2011 Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús Project Manager Projects Branch 1
 
Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone:  301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov
 
Hearing Identifier: Davis_BesseLicenseRenewal_Saf_NonPublic Email Number: 1716   Mail Envelope Properties   (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0805095FF2A)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FW: Davis Besse OI and CI tables Sent Date:   9/29/2011 4:49:42 PM Received Date: 9/29/2011 4:49:47 PM From:   CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Created By:   Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov Recipients:     "'dorts@firstenergycorp.com'" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com> Tracking Status: None "Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource" <Davis-BesseHearingFile.Resource@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "custerc@firstenergycorp.com" <custerc@firstenergycorp.com> Tracking Status: None  
FW: Davis Besse OI and CI tables Sent Date:             9/29/2011 4:49:42 PM Received Date:         9/29/2011 4:49:47 PM From:                   CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Created By:             Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"'dorts@firstenergycorp.com'" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com>
Post Office:   HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   7457     9/29/2011 4:49:47 PM Options Priority:     High   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None "Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource" <Davis-BesseHearingFile.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "custerc@firstenergycorp.com" <custerc@firstenergycorp.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:           HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files                           Size                     Date & Time MESSAGE                         7457                     9/29/2011 4:49:47 PM Options Priority:                       High Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 02:06, 6 December 2019

Lr - FW: Davis Besse OI and Ci Tables
ML11294A153
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 09/29/2011
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML11294A153 (5)


Text

Davis-BesseNPEm Resource From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 4:50 PM To: custerc@firstenergycorp.com Cc: 'dorts@firstenergycorp.com'; Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource

Subject:

FW: Davis Besse OI and CI tables Importance: High Cliff:

The below tables list Davis Besse OI and CI. The tables are different from what I sent yesterday as it reflects my discussions with DLR BCs. We have 20 OI and 2 CI.

Ill give you a call tomorrow to be sure that were consistent with what you understand are the OI/CI for DB.

Regards, Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov RASB Reviewers TRP CI/OI RAI Brogers CI RAI 2.1-3 Lehman/Istar OI 3.0.3.1.10-1 RAI B.2.22-5 (B.2.22-1)

Lehman/Istar OI 3.0.3.1.10-2 RAI B.2.22-6 (B.2.22-2) 1

Lehman/Istar OI 3.0.3.1.10-4 RAI B.2.22-7 (B.2.22-4)

RAI B.2.39-9 (B.2.39-Naus/Lehman 46 OI 3.0.3.2.15-1 1)

B.2.39-11 (B.2.39-Naus/Lehman 46 OI 3.0.3.2.15-3 3)

Naus/Lehman 46 OI 3.0.3.2.16-1 RAI B.2.40-1(B.2.40-2)

ABuford/ASheikh 63 OI 4.6-1 RAI 4.6-1 RARB Reviewers TRP CI/OI RAI Notes regarding how FENOC plans to address the review and incorporation of operating experience into the license MHomiack OI RAI B1.4-1 renewal aging management programs applicants first response do not clearly address information regarding: (1) the functional groups, (2) the link relationships, or (3) the inspection method, including the frequency, specified for the CSA vent valve body and plenum cylinder reinforcing plate.

SMin and the primary reviewer (Trillo) will determine if the applicant 9/16/2011 response is acceptable by Trillo/Min/Yee 73 OI 3.1.2.2-1 RAI 3.1.2.2-3 (3.1.2.2-2) 9/30/2011 We're waiting for the applicant response on SG tube SMin 101 OI RAI 3.1.2.2.16-1 to tubsheet welds by 10/22/2011 2

Oyee/CNg/Medoff OI 4.3.2.3.2-1 RAI 4.3.2.3.2-1 Class 1 valves. This will very likely end as an OI Waiting for applicant suplement letter adding steel crane fatigue analysis as a new TLAA section. the applicant will provide new section by the end of September. On Yee already agreed to provide the SER input soon (within a week) after we receive the new On Yee CI steel crane, fatigue analysis TLAA TLAA section.

ASME Code Case N-481 evaluation. Telecom 6/16 and 7/15/2011-On 8/10/11 letter they need to supplement their LRA to address the timedependent J-integral analysis and TLAA(i). Revised Response received 8/17/2011. Telecon held 9/16/2011 Ching/Medoff OI 4.1-1 RAI 4.1-2 applicant will supplement response to RAI RAPB Reviewers TRP CI/OI RAI Notes

  1. 1 In a teleconference dated August 22, 2011 the applicant stated that the item was intended to be deleted but documentation had not yet been provided Pending the applicants changes to LRA Table 3.2.2-2, the staffs review of this item is not complete and will be tracked as Confirmatory item XXX. Supplemental response received 9/16/2011.

Probably closed I need to check with JWise. #2 Please confirm that these line items are subject to a moist air (external) environment and submit a correction letter stating that, as appropriate. Once the environment has been confirmed for these line items, please restate the AMP to be assigned to these line items related to the applicant's response for 3.2.2.2.3.6-2. The applicant will confirm the environment in an upcoming response letter. Should be closed easily. In 9/16/2011 response letter the LRA was revised to define the moist air (internal)

RAI 3.2.2.2.3.6-2 9/21/2011 e-mail environment to encompass both the air-water on Supplemental RAI response for interface and the air environment above the 3.2.2.2.3.6-2. Teleconference to be interface, we'll discuss this in a Telecon @

Jklos 33 CI 3.2.2.2.3.6-2 scheduled 9/29/2011. 9/29/2011 NRC reviewer was concerned that not all applicable aging effects are identified for the fire water storage tank heat exchanger tubes. FENOC stated that the consequences of tube failure do not directly challenge the function of the tank FENOC will review the issue to determine whether the fire water storage tank heat exchanger should be removed from scope.Waiting for RAI supplement by 9/30/2011.

Issue can be easily closed if they remove the wst from Klos/Kichline 33 OI 3.3.2.14-1 RAI 3.3.2.14-1 scope as they plan to.

3

letdown cooler replacement frequency. Follow-up JGavula OI RAI 2.3.3.18-4(RAI 2.3.3.18-3) RAI issued 9/22/2011 CVIB and CSGB (DCI)

Reviewers TRP CI/OI RAI Notes Table 3.1.2-3 RPV flange leak detection (Nickel Alloy) missing item. Will receive supplemental response by 9/30/2011. Should be closed once we JPoehler/CSydnor/Ganesh OI (9/13/2011 Teleconference) receive the letter.

(Telecon held on 9/13/2011) RAIs will be issued early next week CSydnor 66 OI 4.7.3-1 RAI 4.7.3-1 (Oct 3).

RAIs will be issued early CSydnor 67 OI 4.7.4-1 RAI 4.7.4-1 next week (Oct 3).

OI 4.7.5.2-2 RAI 4.7.5.2- SG shell flaw 2 evaluations. RAIs will be issued early next week (Oct 3).

Sydnor 68 Explain why copper alloy with less than 15 percent zinc components exposed to lubricating oil have no aging effects requiring management or provide an appropriate AMP to manage loss of material. RAI sent Mkichline/AObodoako OI RAI 3.3.2.2.10.4-1 9/22/2011 Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov 4

Hearing Identifier: Davis_BesseLicenseRenewal_Saf_NonPublic Email Number: 1716 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0805095FF2A)

Subject:

FW: Davis Besse OI and CI tables Sent Date: 9/29/2011 4:49:42 PM Received Date: 9/29/2011 4:49:47 PM From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Created By: Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov Recipients:

"'dorts@firstenergycorp.com'" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com>

Tracking Status: None "Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource" <Davis-BesseHearingFile.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "custerc@firstenergycorp.com" <custerc@firstenergycorp.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 7457 9/29/2011 4:49:47 PM Options Priority: High Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: