Information Notice 1986-59, Increased Monitoring of Certain Patients with Implanted Coratomic, Inc. Model C-100 and C-101 Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 07/14/1986
| issue date = 07/14/1986
| title = Increased Monitoring of Certain Patients with Implanted Coratomic, Inc. Model C-100 and C-101 Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers
| title = Increased Monitoring of Certain Patients with Implanted Coratomic, Inc. Model C-100 and C-101 Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers
| author name = Partlow J G
| author name = Partlow J
| author affiliation = NRC/IE
| author affiliation = NRC/IE
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:SSINS No.: 6835 IN 86-59 uIlTED STATES.NUCLEAR REGULATORY
{{#Wiki_filter:SSINS No.: 6835 IN 86-59 uIlTED STATES


COMMISSION
.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


OFFICE OF INSPECTION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AID ENFORCEMENT


===AID ENFORCEMENT===
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 July 14, 1986 IE INFOWATION NOTICE NO. 86-59:        INCREASED    MONITORING OF CERTAIN PATIENTS
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 July 14, 1986 IE INFOWATION


NOTICE NO. 86-59: INCREASED
wITH IMPLANTED CORATOMUC. INC. MODEL C-100
 
                                      AND C-101     JCLEAR-P4ORED CARDIAC PACMEERS
MONITORING
 
OF CERTAIN PATIENTS wITH IMPLANTED
 
CORATOMUC.
 
INC. MODEL C-100 AND C-101 JCLEAR-P4ORED
 
CARDIAC PACMEERS


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
:
:
All NC licensees
                                                                        pacemakers.
 
authorized
 
to use nuclearpowered


cardiac pacemakers.
All NC licensees authorized to use nuclearpowered cardiac


==Purpose==
==Purpose==
: This notice is to alert users of Coratomic, Inc. Model C-100 and C-101 nuclear-powered cardiac pacemakers
:
 
                                                                          and C-101 nuclear- This notice is to alert users of Coratomic, Inc. Model C-100       warning   of possible
of the manufacturer's
 
recent warning of possible problems with certain units. The manufacturer
 
recends increased
 
monitoring
 
of patients with these units iplanted.
 
It is ewpected that licensees
 
will review this information
 
for applicability
 
to their patients and consider actions, if appropriate.
 
However, suggestions
 
contained
 
in this information
 
notice do not constitute
 
NRC requiretments;
therefore, no specific action or written response is required.Description
 
of Circunstances:
By letter dated March 14, 1986, the manufacturer, Coratomic, Inc., notified applicable


attending
powered cardiac pacemakers of the manufacturer's        recent


physicia.s
recends      increased      monitoring


of possible problems with Model C-100 and C-101 plutoniuawpowered
problems with certain units. The manufacturer                            licensees    will


pacemakers
of patients with these units iplanted. It is ewpected            that


that were manufactured
patients    and  consider    actions, review this information for applicability to their this information notice do


between September
if appropriate. However, suggestions contained          in


1974 and October 1977. During that time, '2CM potting material,'
or written
a glue-like


substance, was used In the construction
not constitute NRC requiretments; therefore, no specific action


of the pacers. The reversion
response is required.


of the 2CN potting material to a viscous form in some units has lead to a rate drop nd to a higher-than-anticipated
Description of Circunstances:
                                                                          Inc., notified


random transformer
By letter dated March 14, 1986, the manufacturer, Coratomic,                C-100 and C-101 applicable attending physicia.s of possible problems with Model        September 1974 and


failure rate. Accordingly, Coratomic recoemends
plutoniuawpowered pacemakers that were manufactured betweenglue-like                substance, October 1977. During that time, '2CM potting material,' a of the 2CN potting


that the monitoring
was used In the construction of the    pacers.    The  reversion


of affected patients be increased
material to a viscous form in some units has lead torate.    a rate drop nd to a


to once every 3 months. The March 14 letter included a listing of affected patients.Discussion:
higher-than-anticipated random transformer      failure            Accordingly, Coratomic
There Is no radiological


hazard associated
patients    be increased    to once every


with the problem described
recoemends that the monitoring of affected


in Coratomic's
3 months. The March 14 letter included a      listing    of  affected    patients.


March 14, 1986 letter. However, this notice serves as a reminder that, as a condition
Discussion:
  There Is no radiological hazard associated with the problem            described in


of their license, licensees
Coratomic's March 14, 1986 letter. However, this notice            serves    as a reminder


are required to follow the manufacturer's
that, as a condition of their license, licensees are required of loss    to   follow the


protocol and to notify the NRC within 10 days of loss of contact with a nuclear pacemaker
of contact


patient. If you have any difficulty
manufacturer's protocol and to notify the NRC within 10 days locating or


locating or contacting
with a nuclear pacemaker patient. If you have any difficulty the manufacturer


any affected patient, the NRC suggests you contact the manufacturer
contacting any affected patient, the NRC suggests you contact                       August 1.


for assistance.
for assistance. However, since the Coratomic protocol, dated either 6 months for


However, since the Coratomic
1974 or November 1, 1975, specifies in-person followup visits            every


protocol, dated either August 1.1974 or November 1, 1975, specifies
or C-101  pacemakers    implanted    for more


in-person
patients with Coratomic Model C-100                                                patients.


followup visits every 6 months for patients with Coratomic
than 6 months, you should have no difficulty in contacting affected


Model C-100 or C-101 pacemakers
7OV"
                      re          _        ~


implanted
II


for more than 6 months, you should have no difficulty
IN 86-59 July 14. LO% No swcific action or written response is required by this information notice.


in contacting
If you have ar questions regarding this mtter, please contact the Regional


affected patients.OV" 7 re _ ~
Ainistrator of the appropriate NRC regional office or this office.
II IN 86-59 July 14. LO% No swcific action or written response is required by this information


notice.If you have ar questions
Jas G. Partlow, Director


regarding
ODvision of Inspection Progrems


this mtter, please contact the Regional Ainistrator
Office of Inspection and Enforcement


of the appropriate
===Technical Contact:===


NRC regional office or this office.Jas G. Partlow, Director ODvision of Inspection
===J. R. Netzger, IE===
                      (301) 492-4947 Attactnt:    List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices


Progrems Office of Inspection
Attachment 1 IN 86-59 July 14, 1986 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED


and Enforcement
IE INFORMATION NOTICES


Technical
Information                                  Date of


Contact: J. R. Netzger, IE (301) 492-4947 Attactnt:
Notice No.     Subject                        Issue  Issued to
List of Recently Issued IE Information


Notices
86-58          Dropped Fuel Assembly          7/1V86  All power reactor


Attachment
facilities holding


1 IN 86-59 July 14, 1986 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED IE INFORMATION
an OL or CP


NOTICES Information
86-57          Operating Problems With        7/11/86 All power reactor


Date of Notice No. Subject Issue Issued to 86-58 86-57 36-56 86-55 86-54 Dropped Fuel Assembly Operating
Solenoid Operated Valves At            facilities holding


Problems With Solenoid Operated Valves At Nuclear Power Plants Reliability
Nuclear Power Plants                   an OL or CP


Of Main Steam Safety Valves Delayed Access To Safetr Related Areas And Equipment During Plant Emergencies
36-56          Reliability Of Main Steam     7/10/86 All PMR facilities


Criminal Prosecution
Safety Valves                          holding an 0L or CP


Of A Former Radiation
86-55          Delayed Access To Safetr      7/10/86 All power reactor


===Safety Officer Who Willfully Directed An Unqualified===
Related Areas And Equipment            facilities holding
Individual


===To Perform Radiography===
During Plant Emergencies              an OL or CP
Improper Use Of Heat Shrink-able Tubing 7/1V86 7/11/86 7/10/86 7/10/86 6/27/86 6/26/86 All power reactor facilities


holding an OL or CP All power reactor facilities
86-54          Criminal Prosecution Of A      6/27/86 All holders of by- Former Radiation Safety                product, source, or


holding an OL or CP All PMR holding facilities
Officer Who Willfully                  special nuclear


an 0L or CP 86-53 86-52 Conductor
Directed An Unqualified                material


Insulation
Individual To Perform


Degrada- 6/26/86 tion On Foxboro Model E Controllers
Radiography


Excessive
86-53          Improper Use Of Heat Shrink-  6/26/86 All power reactor


Pneumatic
able Tubing                            facilities holding


Leakage 6/18/86 In The Automatic
an OL or CP


Depressuriza- tion System All power reactor facilities
86-52          Conductor Insulation Degrada- 6/26/86  All power reactor


holding an OL or CP All holders of by-product, source, or special nuclear material All power reactor facilities
tion On Foxboro Model E                facilities holding


holding an OL or CP All power reactor facilities
Controllers                            an OL or CP


holding an OL or CP All BWR facilities
86-51          Excessive Pneumatic Leakage    6/18/86 All BWR facilities


holding an OL or CP All power reactor facilities
In The Automatic Depressuriza-        holding an OL or CP


holding an OL or CP All power reactor facilities
tion System


holding an OL or CP 86-51 86-50 Inadequate
86-50         Inadequate Testing To Detect  6/18i86 All power reactor


Testing To Detect Failures Of Safety-Related
Failures Of Safety-Related             facilities holding


Pneumatic
Pneumatic Components Or                an OL or CP


Components
Systems


Or Systems Age/Environment
86-49          Age/Environment Induced        6/16/86 All power reactor


Induced Electrical
Electrical Cable Failues              facilities holding


Cable Failues 6/18i86 6/16/86 86-49 0L = Operating
an OL or CP


License CP = Construction
0L = Operating License


Permit}}
CP = Construction Permit}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 03:03, 24 November 2019

Increased Monitoring of Certain Patients with Implanted Coratomic, Inc. Model C-100 and C-101 Nuclear-Powered Cardiac Pacemakers
ML031250038
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Three Mile Island, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, 05000000, Zimmer, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Skagit, Marble Hill
Issue date: 07/14/1986
From: Partlow J
NRC/IE
To:
References
IN-86-059, NUDOCS 8607090442
Download: ML031250038 (3)


SSINS No.: 6835 IN 86-59 uIlTED STATES

.NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AID ENFORCEMENT

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 July 14, 1986 IE INFOWATION NOTICE NO. 86-59: INCREASED MONITORING OF CERTAIN PATIENTS

wITH IMPLANTED CORATOMUC. INC. MODEL C-100

AND C-101 JCLEAR-P4ORED CARDIAC PACMEERS

Addressees

pacemakers.

All NC licensees authorized to use nuclearpowered cardiac

Purpose

and C-101 nuclear- This notice is to alert users of Coratomic, Inc. Model C-100 warning of possible

powered cardiac pacemakers of the manufacturer's recent

recends increased monitoring

problems with certain units. The manufacturer licensees will

of patients with these units iplanted. It is ewpected that

patients and consider actions, review this information for applicability to their this information notice do

if appropriate. However, suggestions contained in

or written

not constitute NRC requiretments; therefore, no specific action

response is required.

Description of Circunstances:

Inc., notified

By letter dated March 14, 1986, the manufacturer, Coratomic, C-100 and C-101 applicable attending physicia.s of possible problems with Model September 1974 and

plutoniuawpowered pacemakers that were manufactured betweenglue-like substance, October 1977. During that time, '2CM potting material,' a of the 2CN potting

was used In the construction of the pacers. The reversion

material to a viscous form in some units has lead torate. a rate drop nd to a

higher-than-anticipated random transformer failure Accordingly, Coratomic

patients be increased to once every

recoemends that the monitoring of affected

3 months. The March 14 letter included a listing of affected patients.

Discussion:

There Is no radiological hazard associated with the problem described in

Coratomic's March 14, 1986 letter. However, this notice serves as a reminder

that, as a condition of their license, licensees are required of loss to follow the

of contact

manufacturer's protocol and to notify the NRC within 10 days locating or

with a nuclear pacemaker patient. If you have any difficulty the manufacturer

contacting any affected patient, the NRC suggests you contact August 1.

for assistance. However, since the Coratomic protocol, dated either 6 months for

1974 or November 1, 1975, specifies in-person followup visits every

or C-101 pacemakers implanted for more

patients with Coratomic Model C-100 patients.

than 6 months, you should have no difficulty in contacting affected

7OV"

re _ ~

II

IN 86-59 July 14. LO% No swcific action or written response is required by this information notice.

If you have ar questions regarding this mtter, please contact the Regional

Ainistrator of the appropriate NRC regional office or this office.

Jas G. Partlow, Director

ODvision of Inspection Progrems

Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Technical Contact:

J. R. Netzger, IE

(301) 492-4947 Attactnt: List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices

Attachment 1 IN 86-59 July 14, 1986 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

IE INFORMATION NOTICES

Information Date of

Notice No. Subject Issue Issued to

86-58 Dropped Fuel Assembly 7/1V86 All power reactor

facilities holding

an OL or CP

86-57 Operating Problems With 7/11/86 All power reactor

Solenoid Operated Valves At facilities holding

Nuclear Power Plants an OL or CP

36-56 Reliability Of Main Steam 7/10/86 All PMR facilities

Safety Valves holding an 0L or CP

86-55 Delayed Access To Safetr 7/10/86 All power reactor

Related Areas And Equipment facilities holding

During Plant Emergencies an OL or CP

86-54 Criminal Prosecution Of A 6/27/86 All holders of by- Former Radiation Safety product, source, or

Officer Who Willfully special nuclear

Directed An Unqualified material

Individual To Perform

Radiography

86-53 Improper Use Of Heat Shrink- 6/26/86 All power reactor

able Tubing facilities holding

an OL or CP

86-52 Conductor Insulation Degrada- 6/26/86 All power reactor

tion On Foxboro Model E facilities holding

Controllers an OL or CP

86-51 Excessive Pneumatic Leakage 6/18/86 All BWR facilities

In The Automatic Depressuriza- holding an OL or CP

tion System

86-50 Inadequate Testing To Detect 6/18i86 All power reactor

Failures Of Safety-Related facilities holding

Pneumatic Components Or an OL or CP

Systems

86-49 Age/Environment Induced 6/16/86 All power reactor

Electrical Cable Failues facilities holding

an OL or CP

0L = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit