Information Notice 2003-06, Failure of Safety-Related Linestarter Relays at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 06/19/2003
| issue date = 06/19/2003
| title = Failure of Safety-Related Linestarter Relays at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
| title = Failure of Safety-Related Linestarter Relays at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
| author name = Beckner W D
| author name = Beckner W
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP/RORP
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DRIP/RORP
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001June 19, 2003NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2003-06:FAILURE OF SAFETY-RELATED LINESTARTERRELAYS AT SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES


===GENERATING STATION===
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
 
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 June 19, 2003 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2003-06:                  FAILURE OF SAFETY-RELATED LINESTARTER
 
RELAYS AT SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR
 
GENERATING STATION


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors, exceptthose that have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors, except
 
those that have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been


permanently removed from the reactor.
permanently removed from the reactor.


==Purpose==
==Purpose==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to informaddressees of recent failures of safety-related valves due to linestarter relay degradation. The
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to inform
 
addressees of recent failures of safety-related valves due to linestarter relay degradation. The


degradation was caused by past use of excessive amounts of trichloroethane-based cleaners
degradation was caused by past use of excessive amounts of trichloroethane-based cleaners


during preventive maintenance. It is expected that recipients will review the information for
during preventive maintenance. It is expected that recipients will review the information for


applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.
applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.
Line 38: Line 50:


==Description of Circumstances==
==Description of Circumstances==
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station utilizes reversing linestarters manufactured by SquareD to operate the motors on safety-related motor-operated valves. The linestarter consists of
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station utilizes reversing linestarters manufactured by Square
 
D to operate the motors on safety-related motor-operated valves. The linestarter consists of


two relays that provide 480 volt power to the motor and contain auxiliary contacts associated
two relays that provide 480 volt power to the motor and contain auxiliary contacts associated


with interlock and seal-in functions. The interlock function provides a means to avoid
with interlock and seal-in functions. The interlock function provides a means to avoid
 
energizing both open and closed relays at the same time. The seal-in function keeps the relay
 
energized until the valve has completed its stroke. All reversing linestarters have interlock


energizing both open and closed relays at the same time. The seal-in function keeps the relay
auxiliary contacts. San Onofre has 172 Square D linestarters associated with safety-related


energized until the valve has completed its stroke. All reversing linestarters have interlock
motor-operated valves, 86 in each unit.


auxiliary contacts.  San Onofre has 172 Square D linestarters associated with safety-related
On August 30, 2002, a Unit 3 low-pressure safety injection (LPSI) pump mini-recirculation valve


motor-operated valves, 86 in each unit.On August 30, 2002, a Unit 3 low-pressure safety injection (LPSI) pump mini-recirculation valvefailed to open during surveillance testing. Subsequent analysis determined that the plastic
failed to open during surveillance testing. Subsequent analysis determined that the plastic


housing on an auxiliary contact in the associated linestarter was degraded. The licensee
housing on an auxiliary contact in the associated linestarter was degraded. The licensee


determined that the auxiliary contact housing degradation was caused by the past use of
determined that the auxiliary contact housing degradation was caused by the past use of


excessive amounts of Inhibisol, a cleaning solvent based on trichloroethane (TCE). The
excessive amounts of Inhibisol, a cleaning solvent based on trichloroethane (TCE). The
 
cleaning solvent caused the plastic to break down. Over time, small amounts of the plastic


cleaning solvent caused the plastic to break down.  Over time, small amounts of the plastic
came loose and interfered with the electrical contacts, resulting in the valve failure.


came loose and interfered with the electrical contacts, resulting in the valve failure.  In response to the LPSI pump mini-recirculation valve failure, San Onofre developed a plan toinspect a sample of other safety-related linestarters installed in Units 2 and 3. In October 2002, San Onofre completed the inspection of 19 additional linestarters. This sample inspection
In response to the LPSI pump mini-recirculation valve failure, San Onofre developed a plan to
 
inspect a sample of other safety-related linestarters installed in Units 2 and 3. In October 2002, San Onofre completed the inspection of 19 additional linestarters. This sample inspection


identified two auxiliary contacts that showed signs of chemical attack (i.e., cloudy plastic contact
identified two auxiliary contacts that showed signs of chemical attack (i.e., cloudy plastic contact


housing); however, both were found to be functional. Subsequently, the licensee developed a
housing); however, both were found to be functional. Subsequently, the licensee developed a


risk-informed plan to inspect all safety-related linestarters and replace all auxiliary contacts
risk-informed plan to inspect all safety-related linestarters and replace all auxiliary contacts


showing signs of chemical attack. The linestarter inspections were scheduled into online and
showing signs of chemical attack. The linestarter inspections were scheduled into online and


outage maintenance windows, and will be completed by the end of the Unit 2 outage in 2004.On January 18, 2003, during a Unit 3 refueling outage, the quench tank sample containmentisolation valve failed to open during surveillance testing.  Examination of the contact revealed
outage maintenance windows, and will be completed by the end of the Unit 2 outage in 2004.


that a similar chemical attack had occurred and caused the valve failure.On February 10, 2003, during an inspection of Unit 3 LPSI header stop valve linestarters, anauxiliary contact failed on the 20th cycle of the auxiliary contact test.  The linestarter inspectionsincluded a test to cycle each auxiliary contact 20 times.  This auxiliary contact cycle test was
On January 18, 2003, during a Unit 3 refueling outage, the quench tank sample containment


performed to determine the functionality of the auxiliary contacts in the linestarter.On Unit 3, all 86 linestarters have been inspected with two surveillance test failures noted andone maintenance test failure. The licensee replaced 42 auxiliary contacts from the linestarters
isolation valve failed to open during surveillance testing. Examination of the contact revealed


due to evidence of chemical attack on the plastic auxiliary contact housing. On Unit 2,
that a similar chemical attack had occurred and caused the valve failure.
 
On February 10, 2003, during an inspection of Unit 3 LPSI header stop valve linestarters, an
 
auxiliary contact failed on the 20th cycle of the auxiliary contact test. The linestarter inspections
 
included a test to cycle each auxiliary contact 20 times. This auxiliary contact cycle test was
 
performed to determine the functionality of the auxiliary contacts in the linestarter.
 
On Unit 3, all 86 linestarters have been inspected with two surveillance test failures noted and
 
one maintenance test failure. The licensee replaced 42 auxiliary contacts from the linestarters
 
due to evidence of chemical attack on the plastic auxiliary contact housing. On Unit 2,
33 linestarters have been inspected as of May 2, 2003, with no failures noted; however, four
33 linestarters have been inspected as of May 2, 2003, with no failures noted; however, four


auxiliary contacts showed signs of chemical attack on the plastic contact case.DiscussionAs a result of the valve stroke failure on August 30, 2002, the licensee initiated a laboratoryanalysis of the suspect auxiliary contact from the linestarter.  The contact was coated with a
auxiliary contacts showed signs of chemical attack on the plastic contact case.


plastic residue from the deterioration of the plastic switch bodies. The licensee concluded that
Discussion
 
As a result of the valve stroke failure on August 30, 2002, the licensee initiated a laboratory
 
analysis of the suspect auxiliary contact from the linestarter. The contact was coated with a
 
plastic residue from the deterioration of the plastic switch bodies. The licensee concluded that


excessive use of cleaning solvents during previous preventive maintenance activities had
excessive use of cleaning solvents during previous preventive maintenance activities had


caused the failure of the contacts. The licensee believes that all damage to the auxiliary contact housings occurred prior to 1989and is showing up in the recent safety-related valve failures. The original linestarter preventive
caused the failure of the contacts.
 
The licensee believes that all damage to the auxiliary contact housings occurred prior to 1989 and is showing up in the recent safety-related valve failures. The original linestarter preventive


maintenance procedure was issued in April 1984, and required the use of cleaning solvents on
maintenance procedure was issued in April 1984, and required the use of cleaning solvents on
Line 91: Line 135:
linestarters, but had no caution regarding the potential for damage to plastic components within
linestarters, but had no caution regarding the potential for damage to plastic components within


the linestarter. Also, the procedure did not require visual inspection of internally mounted
the linestarter. Also, the procedure did not require visual inspection of internally mounted


auxiliary contact assemblies. As a result, Inhibisol was used liberally, which allowed the cleaner
auxiliary contact assemblies. As a result, Inhibisol was used liberally, which allowed the cleaner


to come in contact with plastics that were susceptible to chemical degradation. In April 1989, the licensee recognized that TCE-based cleaners were being used improperly and that controls
to come in contact with plastics that were susceptible to chemical degradation. In April 1989, the licensee recognized that TCE-based cleaners were being used improperly and that controls


needed to be implemented to prevent future damage to equipment containing plastics. The
needed to be implemented to prevent future damage to equipment containing plastics. The


licensee revised the consumables controls manual to restrict the use of TCE-based cleaners on
licensee revised the consumables controls manual to restrict the use of TCE-based cleaners on
Line 103: Line 147:
plastics, and provided guidance on the approved method for use of the cleaner (i.e., spray on
plastics, and provided guidance on the approved method for use of the cleaner (i.e., spray on


cloth, then wipe component). Additionally, the linestarter preventive maintenance procedure
cloth, then wipe component). Additionally, the linestarter preventive maintenance procedure


was revised to caution that cleaning solvents should be used sparingly to avoid damage to
was revised to caution that cleaning solvents should be used sparingly to avoid damage to


plastic components. In response to the recent valve failures, the licensee took action on
plastic components. In response to the recent valve failures, the licensee took action on


March 7, 2003, to prohibit the use of all TCE-based cleaners for electrical maintenance
March 7, 2003, to prohibit the use of all TCE-based cleaners for electrical maintenance


applications. The licensee missed several opportunities from plant and industry experience to recognize theneed for an extent-of-condition review. An extent-of-condition review could have identified any
applications. The licensee missed several opportunities from plant and industry experience to recognize the
 
need for an extent-of-condition review. An extent-of-condition review could have identified any


equipment degradation that occurred throughout the plant due to improper use of cleaning
equipment degradation that occurred throughout the plant due to improper use of cleaning


solvents. One of these prior opportunities was the review of Information Notice 93-76,
solvents. One of these prior opportunities was the review of Information Notice 93-76, Inadequate Control of Paint and Cleaners for Safety Related Equipment, which the licensee
"Inadequate Control of Paint and Cleaners for Safety Related Equipment," which the licensee


performed in February 1994. The review determined that the programs in place were sufficient
performed in February 1994. The review determined that the programs in place were sufficient


to avoid problems similar to those discussed in the notice. The licensee focused on the TCE-
to avoid problems similar to those discussed in the notice. The licensee focused on the TCE-
based cleaner controls in place at the time of the information notice review, but overlooked the
based cleaner controls in place at the time of the information notice review, but overlooked the


fact that safety-related equipment could have been damaged prior to the implementation of the
fact that safety-related equipment could have been damaged prior to the implementation of the


controls in April 1989. This oversight was a missed opportunity to correct the equipment
controls in April 1989. This oversight was a missed opportunity to correct the equipment


deficiency that has been revealed by the recent linestarter failures and the discovery of
deficiency that has been revealed by the recent linestarter failures and the discovery of


degraded contacts.The San Onofre linestarter experience emphasizes the need to perform an extent-of-conditionreview to determine equipment impact when an improper maintenance practice is recognized
degraded contacts.


and corrected. Further, the root cause analysis revealed that past improper use of corrosive
The San Onofre linestarter experience emphasizes the need to perform an extent-of-condition
 
review to determine equipment impact when an improper maintenance practice is recognized
 
and corrected. Further, the root cause analysis revealed that past improper use of corrosive


cleaners could result in degraded plant equipment that could remain undetected for a
cleaners could result in degraded plant equipment that could remain undetected for a


considerable length of time before showing up in equipment failures.This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have anyquestions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts
considerable length of time before showing up in equipment failures.
 
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any
 
questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts


listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager./RA/William D. Beckner, Program Director
listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.


===Operating Reactor Improvements Program===
/RA/
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
                                              William D. Beckner, Program Director


Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts:Gregory G. WarnickVern Hodge623-386-3638301-415-1861 Email:gxw2@nrc.govEmail: cvh@nrc.govAttachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices The licensee missed several opportunities from plant and industry experience to recognize theneed for an extent-of-condition review.  An extent-of-condition review could have identified any
Operating Reactor Improvements Program


equipment degradation that occurred throughout the plant due to improper use of cleaning
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs


solvents.  One of these prior opportunities was the review of Information Notice 93-76,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
"Inadequate Control of Paint and Cleaners for Safety Related Equipment," which the licenseeperformed in February 1994.  The review determined that the programs in place were sufficient


to avoid problems similar to those discussed in the notice. The licensee focused on the TCE-
Technical Contacts:    Gregory G. Warnick                    Vern Hodge
based cleaner controls in place at the time of the information notice review, but overlooked the


fact that safety-related equipment could have been damaged prior to the implementation of the
623-386-3638                          301-415-1861 Email: gxw2@nrc.gov                  Email: cvh@nrc.gov


controls in April 1989.  This oversight was a missed opportunity to correct the equipment
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices


deficiency that has been revealed by the recent linestarter failures and the discovery of
031700033 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\RORP\OES\Staff Folders\Hodge\san_line inf.wpd


degraded contacts.The San Onofre linestarter experience emphasizes the need to perform an extent-of-conditionreview to determine equipment impact when an improper maintenance practice is recognized
OFFICE    OES:RORP:DRIP      Tech Editor      RIV            EMCB


and corrected.  Further, the root cause analysis revealed that past improper use of corrosive
NAME      CVHodge            PKleene          GWarnick      KParcszewski


cleaners could result in degraded plant equipment that could remain undetected for a
DATE      06/10/2003          06/09/2003      06/12/2003    06/10/2003 OFFICE    SC:OES:RORP:DRIP PD:RORP:DRIP


considerable length of time before showing up in equipment failures.This information notice requires no specific action or written response.  If you have anyquestions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts
NAME      TReis              WDBeckner


listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager./RA/William D. Beckner, Program Director
DATE      06/18/2003          06/19/2003


===Operating Reactor Improvements Program===
Attachment LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs


Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical Contacts:Gregory G. WarnickVern Hodge623-386-3638301-415-1861 Email:gxw2@nrc.govEmail: cvh@nrc.govAttachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesDISTRIBUTION:ADAMS
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES


IN FileADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER:031700033DOCUMENT NAME: G:\RORP\OES\Staff Folders\Hodge\san_line inf.wpdOFFICEOES:RORP:DRIPTech EditorRIVEMCBNAMECVHodgePKleeneGWarnickKParcszewskiDATE06/10/200306/09/200306/12/200306/10/2003OFFICESC:OES:RORP:DRIPPD:RORP:DRIPNAMETReisWDBecknerDATE06/18/200306/19/2003OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Information                                              Date of


______________________________________________________________________________________OL = Operating License
Notice No.              Subject                          Issuance        Issued to


CP = Construction PermitAttachment LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNRC INFORMATION NOTICES_____________________________________________________________________________________InformationDate of
_____________________________________________________________________________________
2003-05          Failure to Detect Freespan            06/05/2003      All holders of operating licenses


Notice No.        SubjectIssuanceIssued to_____________________________________________________________________________________2003-05Failure to Detect FreespanCracks in PWR Steam
Cracks in PWR Steam                                   or construction permits for


Generator Tubes06/05/2003All holders of operating licensesor construction permits for
Generator Tubes                                        pressurized-water reactors


pressurized-water reactors
(PWRs).


(PWRs).2002-15, Sup 1Potential HydrogenCombustion Events in BWR
2002-15, Sup 1    Potential Hydrogen                    05/06/2003      All holders of operating licenses


Piping05/06/2003All holders of operating licensesfor light water reactors, except
Combustion Events in BWR                              for light water reactors, except


those who have permanently
Piping                                                those who have permanently


ceased operations and have
ceased operations and have
Line 197: Line 249:
permanently removed from the
permanently removed from the


reactor.2002-21, Sup 1Axial Outside-diameterCracking Affecting Thermally
reactor.


===Treated Alloy 600 Steam===
2002-21, Sup 1    Axial Outside-diameter                04/01/2003      All holders of operating licensees
Generator Tubing04/01/2003All holders of operating licenseesfor nuclear power reactors, except those who have


permanently ceased operations
Cracking Affecting Thermally                          for nuclear power reactors, Treated Alloy 600 Steam                                except those who have
 
Generator Tubing                                      permanently ceased operations


and have certified that fuel has
and have certified that fuel has
Line 208: Line 261:
been permanently removed from
been permanently removed from


the reactor vessel.2003-04Summary of Fitness-For-DutyProgram Performance Reports
the reactor vessel.
 
2003-04          Summary of Fitness-For-Duty          02/06/2003      All holders of operating licensees


for Calendar Year 200002/06/2003All holders of operating licenseesfor nuclear power reactors, except those who have
Program Performance Reports                            for nuclear power reactors, for Calendar Year 2000                                except those who have


permanently ceased operations
permanently ceased operations
Line 218: Line 273:
been permanently removed from
been permanently removed from


the reactor vessel.2003-03Part 21 - Inadequately StakedCapscrew Renders Residual
the reactor vessel.


===Heat Removal Pump===
2003-03          Part 21 - Inadequately Staked        01/27/2003      All holders of operating licenses
Inoperable01/27/2003All holders of operating licensesor construction permits for


nuclear power reactors.Note:NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they areissued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the followingcommand in the message portion:subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname
Capscrew Renders Residual                              or construction permits for


}}
Heat Removal Pump                                      nuclear power reactors.
 
Inoperable
 
Note:            NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are
 
issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:
                To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following
 
command in the message portion:
                                    subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname
 
______________________________________________________________________________________
OL = Operating License
 
CP = Construction Permit}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 02:47, 24 November 2019

Failure of Safety-Related Linestarter Relays at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
ML031700033
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/19/2003
From: Beckner W
NRC/NRR/DRIP/RORP
To:
Hodge, CV, NRR/DRIP/RORP, (415-1861)
References
+sunsimjr=200611, -RFPFR IN-03-006
Download: ML031700033 (5)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 June 19, 2003 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2003-06: FAILURE OF SAFETY-RELATED LINESTARTER

RELAYS AT SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR

GENERATING STATION

Addressees

All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors, except

those that have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the reactor.

Purpose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to inform

addressees of recent failures of safety-related valves due to linestarter relay degradation. The

degradation was caused by past use of excessive amounts of trichloroethane-based cleaners

during preventive maintenance. It is expected that recipients will review the information for

applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.

However, suggestions in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no

specific action or written response is required.

Description of Circumstances

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station utilizes reversing linestarters manufactured by Square

D to operate the motors on safety-related motor-operated valves. The linestarter consists of

two relays that provide 480 volt power to the motor and contain auxiliary contacts associated

with interlock and seal-in functions. The interlock function provides a means to avoid

energizing both open and closed relays at the same time. The seal-in function keeps the relay

energized until the valve has completed its stroke. All reversing linestarters have interlock

auxiliary contacts. San Onofre has 172 Square D linestarters associated with safety-related

motor-operated valves, 86 in each unit.

On August 30, 2002, a Unit 3 low-pressure safety injection (LPSI) pump mini-recirculation valve

failed to open during surveillance testing. Subsequent analysis determined that the plastic

housing on an auxiliary contact in the associated linestarter was degraded. The licensee

determined that the auxiliary contact housing degradation was caused by the past use of

excessive amounts of Inhibisol, a cleaning solvent based on trichloroethane (TCE). The

cleaning solvent caused the plastic to break down. Over time, small amounts of the plastic

came loose and interfered with the electrical contacts, resulting in the valve failure.

In response to the LPSI pump mini-recirculation valve failure, San Onofre developed a plan to

inspect a sample of other safety-related linestarters installed in Units 2 and 3. In October 2002, San Onofre completed the inspection of 19 additional linestarters. This sample inspection

identified two auxiliary contacts that showed signs of chemical attack (i.e., cloudy plastic contact

housing); however, both were found to be functional. Subsequently, the licensee developed a

risk-informed plan to inspect all safety-related linestarters and replace all auxiliary contacts

showing signs of chemical attack. The linestarter inspections were scheduled into online and

outage maintenance windows, and will be completed by the end of the Unit 2 outage in 2004.

On January 18, 2003, during a Unit 3 refueling outage, the quench tank sample containment

isolation valve failed to open during surveillance testing. Examination of the contact revealed

that a similar chemical attack had occurred and caused the valve failure.

On February 10, 2003, during an inspection of Unit 3 LPSI header stop valve linestarters, an

auxiliary contact failed on the 20th cycle of the auxiliary contact test. The linestarter inspections

included a test to cycle each auxiliary contact 20 times. This auxiliary contact cycle test was

performed to determine the functionality of the auxiliary contacts in the linestarter.

On Unit 3, all 86 linestarters have been inspected with two surveillance test failures noted and

one maintenance test failure. The licensee replaced 42 auxiliary contacts from the linestarters

due to evidence of chemical attack on the plastic auxiliary contact housing. On Unit 2,

33 linestarters have been inspected as of May 2, 2003, with no failures noted; however, four

auxiliary contacts showed signs of chemical attack on the plastic contact case.

Discussion

As a result of the valve stroke failure on August 30, 2002, the licensee initiated a laboratory

analysis of the suspect auxiliary contact from the linestarter. The contact was coated with a

plastic residue from the deterioration of the plastic switch bodies. The licensee concluded that

excessive use of cleaning solvents during previous preventive maintenance activities had

caused the failure of the contacts.

The licensee believes that all damage to the auxiliary contact housings occurred prior to 1989 and is showing up in the recent safety-related valve failures. The original linestarter preventive

maintenance procedure was issued in April 1984, and required the use of cleaning solvents on

linestarters, but had no caution regarding the potential for damage to plastic components within

the linestarter. Also, the procedure did not require visual inspection of internally mounted

auxiliary contact assemblies. As a result, Inhibisol was used liberally, which allowed the cleaner

to come in contact with plastics that were susceptible to chemical degradation. In April 1989, the licensee recognized that TCE-based cleaners were being used improperly and that controls

needed to be implemented to prevent future damage to equipment containing plastics. The

licensee revised the consumables controls manual to restrict the use of TCE-based cleaners on

plastics, and provided guidance on the approved method for use of the cleaner (i.e., spray on

cloth, then wipe component). Additionally, the linestarter preventive maintenance procedure

was revised to caution that cleaning solvents should be used sparingly to avoid damage to

plastic components. In response to the recent valve failures, the licensee took action on

March 7, 2003, to prohibit the use of all TCE-based cleaners for electrical maintenance

applications. The licensee missed several opportunities from plant and industry experience to recognize the

need for an extent-of-condition review. An extent-of-condition review could have identified any

equipment degradation that occurred throughout the plant due to improper use of cleaning

solvents. One of these prior opportunities was the review of Information Notice 93-76, Inadequate Control of Paint and Cleaners for Safety Related Equipment, which the licensee

performed in February 1994. The review determined that the programs in place were sufficient

to avoid problems similar to those discussed in the notice. The licensee focused on the TCE-

based cleaner controls in place at the time of the information notice review, but overlooked the

fact that safety-related equipment could have been damaged prior to the implementation of the

controls in April 1989. This oversight was a missed opportunity to correct the equipment

deficiency that has been revealed by the recent linestarter failures and the discovery of

degraded contacts.

The San Onofre linestarter experience emphasizes the need to perform an extent-of-condition

review to determine equipment impact when an improper maintenance practice is recognized

and corrected. Further, the root cause analysis revealed that past improper use of corrosive

cleaners could result in degraded plant equipment that could remain undetected for a

considerable length of time before showing up in equipment failures.

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any

questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts

listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

/RA/

William D. Beckner, Program Director

Operating Reactor Improvements Program

Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contacts: Gregory G. Warnick Vern Hodge

623-386-3638 301-415-1861 Email: gxw2@nrc.gov Email: cvh@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

031700033 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\RORP\OES\Staff Folders\Hodge\san_line inf.wpd

OFFICE OES:RORP:DRIP Tech Editor RIV EMCB

NAME CVHodge PKleene GWarnick KParcszewski

DATE 06/10/2003 06/09/2003 06/12/2003 06/10/2003 OFFICE SC:OES:RORP:DRIP PD:RORP:DRIP

NAME TReis WDBeckner

DATE 06/18/2003 06/19/2003

Attachment LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Information Date of

Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to

_____________________________________________________________________________________

2003-05 Failure to Detect Freespan 06/05/2003 All holders of operating licenses

Cracks in PWR Steam or construction permits for

Generator Tubes pressurized-water reactors

(PWRs).

2002-15, Sup 1 Potential Hydrogen 05/06/2003 All holders of operating licenses

Combustion Events in BWR for light water reactors, except

Piping those who have permanently

ceased operations and have

certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the

reactor.

2002-21, Sup 1 Axial Outside-diameter 04/01/2003 All holders of operating licensees

Cracking Affecting Thermally for nuclear power reactors, Treated Alloy 600 Steam except those who have

Generator Tubing permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has

been permanently removed from

the reactor vessel.

2003-04 Summary of Fitness-For-Duty 02/06/2003 All holders of operating licensees

Program Performance Reports for nuclear power reactors, for Calendar Year 2000 except those who have

permanently ceased operations

and have certified that fuel has

been permanently removed from

the reactor vessel.

2003-03 Part 21 - Inadequately Staked 01/27/2003 All holders of operating licenses

Capscrew Renders Residual or construction permits for

Heat Removal Pump nuclear power reactors.

Inoperable

Note: NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are

issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:

To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following

command in the message portion:

subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname

______________________________________________________________________________________

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit