ML081680543: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 06/12/2008 | | issue date = 06/12/2008 | ||
| title = Acceptance Review Complete on RR No. 08-ON-001 | | title = Acceptance Review Complete on RR No. 08-ON-001 | ||
| author name = Olshan L | | author name = Olshan L | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLII-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLII-1 | ||
| addressee name = Gray C | | addressee name = Gray C | ||
| addressee affiliation = Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | | addressee affiliation = Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | ||
| docket = 05000270 | | docket = 05000270 | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Leonard Olshan Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:52 PM To: 'cagray@duke-energy.com' Cc: Melanie Wong; Terence Chan; Keith Hoffman | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Leonard Olshan Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:52 PM To: 'cagray@duke-energy.com' Cc: Melanie Wong; Terence Chan; Keith Hoffman | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternative would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without acompensating increase in the level of quality or safety. | Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternative would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without acompensating increase in the level of quality or safety. | ||
We have reviewed your relief request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable us to proceed with our detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for us to complete our technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | We have reviewed your relief request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable us to proceed with our detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for us to complete our technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties () | E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties () | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance review complete on RR No. 08-ON-001 | Acceptance review complete on RR No. 08-ON-001 Sent Date: 6/12/2008 2:36:59 PM Received Date: 6/12/2008 2:52:00 PM From: Leonard Olshan Created By: Leonard.Olshan@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
Sent Date: | |||
Created By: Leonard.Olshan@nrc.gov | |||
Recipients: | |||
cagray@duke-energy.com ('cagray@duke-energy.com') | cagray@duke-energy.com ('cagray@duke-energy.com') | ||
Tracking Status: None Melanie.Wong@nrc.gov (Melanie Wong) | Tracking Status: None Melanie.Wong@nrc.gov (Melanie Wong) | ||
Tracking Status: None Terence.Chan@nrc.gov (Terence Chan) | Tracking Status: None Terence.Chan@nrc.gov (Terence Chan) | ||
Tracking Status: None Keith.Hoffman@nrc.gov (Keith Hoffman) | Tracking Status: None Keith.Hoffman@nrc.gov (Keith Hoffman) | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None | ||
Sensitivity: | Post Office: | ||
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 9178 6/12/2008 Options Expiration Date: | |||
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:}} |
Latest revision as of 16:46, 14 November 2019
ML081680543 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oconee ![]() |
Issue date: | 06/12/2008 |
From: | Olshan L NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLII-1 |
To: | Gray C Duke Energy Carolinas |
References | |
RR 08-ON-001, TAC MD8666 | |
Download: ML081680543 (1) | |
Text
From: Leonard Olshan Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:52 PM To: 'cagray@duke-energy.com' Cc: Melanie Wong; Terence Chan; Keith Hoffman
Subject:
Acceptance review complete on RR No. 08-ON-001 By letter dated April 29, 2008, you submitted Request for Relief No. 08-ON-001 for Oconee Nuclear Station. Unit 1. You requested relief for 7 welds from the 90-percent examination requirements of Code Case N-460. An acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow us to complete our detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternative would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without acompensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
We have reviewed your relief request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable us to proceed with our detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for us to complete our technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()
Subject:
Acceptance review complete on RR No. 08-ON-001 Sent Date: 6/12/2008 2:36:59 PM Received Date: 6/12/2008 2:52:00 PM From: Leonard Olshan Created By: Leonard.Olshan@nrc.gov Recipients:
cagray@duke-energy.com ('cagray@duke-energy.com')
Tracking Status: None Melanie.Wong@nrc.gov (Melanie Wong)
Tracking Status: None Terence.Chan@nrc.gov (Terence Chan)
Tracking Status: None Keith.Hoffman@nrc.gov (Keith Hoffman)
Tracking Status: None
Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 9178 6/12/2008 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: