ML110470066: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML110470066
| number = ML110470066
| issue date = 03/07/2011
| issue date = 03/07/2011
| title = Response to Legal Counsel for Callaway Plant Ameren Missouri'S Understanding That Lawrence S. Criscione'S Official NRC Duties and Responsibilities Will Not Involve Callaway Matters (TAC No. ME4721)
| title = Response to Legal Counsel for Callaway Plant Ameren Missouri'S Understanding That Lawrence S. Criscione'S Official NRC Duties and Responsibilities Will Not Involve Callaway Matters
| author name = Thadani M C
| author name = Thadani M
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| addressee name = Shapiro D M
| addressee name = Shapiro D
| addressee affiliation = Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP
| addressee affiliation = Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP
| docket = 05000483
| docket = 05000483
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:March 7, 2011  
{{#Wiki_filter:March 7, 2011 Mr. Daryl M. Shapiro Counsel for Union Electric Company Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP 2300 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20037-1122
 
Mr. Daryl M. Shapiro Counsel for Union Electric Company Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP 2300 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20037-1122  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 - LEGAL COUNSEL'S RESPONSE FOR UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY RE: PETITION FILED WITH NRC BY MR. LAWRENCE S. CRISCIONE (TAC NO. ME4721)  
CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 - LEGAL COUNSELS RESPONSE FOR UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY RE: PETITION FILED WITH NRC BY MR. LAWRENCE S. CRISCIONE (TAC NO. ME4721)


==Dear Mr. Shapiro:==
==Dear Mr. Shapiro:==


I am replying to your letter dated January 6, 2011 1 in which you submitted a response to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Petition Review Board (PRB) regarding Mr. Lawrence S. Criscione's petition dated September 17, 2010.
I am replying to your letter dated January 6, 20111 in which you submitted a response to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRCs) Petition Review Board (PRB) regarding Mr.
Lawrence S. Crisciones petition dated September 17, 2010.
In your written response, you stated that NRC should reject the petition, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206 (10 CFR 2.206) and consistent with NRC Management Directive 8.11, in that the NRC will not review a petition where allegations have already been the subject of NRC Staff review and present no significant new information.
In your written response, you stated that NRC should reject the petition, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206 (10 CFR 2.206) and consistent with NRC Management Directive 8.11, in that the NRC will not review a petition where allegations have already been the subject of NRC Staff review and present no significant new information.
In your letter dated January 6, 2011, you also stated that, One more comment must be made with respect to the Petition. In the Petition, Mr. Criscione uses the first-person "we" to refer to himself and the NRC collectively. Petition at 2. This makes it appear that the Petition was an official NRC communication concerning Callaway and its personnel. Ameren Missouri would like to reiterate and confirm the understanding it has with the NRC that Mr. Criscione's official NRC duties and responsibilities will not involve any matters with respect to Callaway.
In your letter dated January 6, 2011, you also stated that, One more comment must be made with respect to the Petition. In the Petition, Mr. Criscione uses the first-person "we" to refer to himself and the NRC collectively. Petition at 2. This makes it appear that the Petition was an official NRC communication concerning Callaway and its personnel. Ameren Missouri would like to reiterate and confirm the understanding it has with the NRC that Mr. Criscione's official NRC duties and responsibilities will not involve any matters with respect to Callaway.
On January 19, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
On January 19, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML110140104), the NRC responded to Mr. Criscione's petition dated September 17, 2010. In that letter, the NRC informed Mr. Criscione that the PRB's final recommendation is that the petition meets rejection criterion III.C.2.b in Management Directive 8.11, "Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions," dated July 1, 1999, and revised October 25, 2000. This decision was made based on the determination that no additional relevant information was provided during Mr. Criscione's presentation that had not already been previously reviewed, evaluated, and resolved by the NRC staff.  
Accession No. ML110140104), the NRC responded to Mr. Crisciones petition dated September 17, 2010. In that letter, the NRC informed Mr. Criscione that the PRBs final recommendation is that the petition meets rejection criterion III.C.2.b in Management Directive 8.11, Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions, dated July 1, 1999, and revised October 25, 2000. This decision was made based on the determination that no additional relevant information was provided during Mr. Crisciones presentation that had not already been previously reviewed, evaluated, and resolved by the NRC staff.
 
1 Submitted under 10 CFR 2.390 requesting withholding on the basis the document contains confidential information.
1 Submitted under 10 CFR 2.390 requesting withholding on the basis the document contains confidential information.
D. Shapiro Concerning your comment regarding Mr. Criscione's NRC duties and responsibilities, Mr. Criscione's participation with respect to this petition and the NRC PRB was that of a private citizen. The government-wide standards of conduct regulations require NRC employees to disqualify themselves from participating in particular matters involving parties that they know are likely to affect the financial interests of anyone they served, within the last year, as an employee, unless they receive authorization. There are no other legal restrictions on an NRC employee's involvement in matters affecting their former employers. The NRC maintains an open, collaborative working environment that encourages all employees to promptly voice differing views, which could include views related to any plant including Callaway.


If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1476, or e-mail mohan.thadani@nrc.gov. Sincerely,   /RA/
D. Shapiro                                        Concerning your comment regarding Mr. Crisciones NRC duties and responsibilities, Mr.
Mohan C. Thadani, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-483  
Crisciones participation with respect to this petition and the NRC PRB was that of a private citizen. The government-wide standards of conduct regulations require NRC employees to disqualify themselves from participating in particular matters involving parties that they know are likely to affect the financial interests of anyone they served, within the last year, as an employee, unless they receive authorization. There are no other legal restrictions on an NRC employees involvement in matters affecting their former employers. The NRC maintains an open, collaborative working environment that encourages all employees to promptly voice differing views, which could include views related to any plant including Callaway.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1476, or e-mail mohan.thadani@nrc.gov.
Sincerely,
                                                        /RA/
Mohan C. Thadani, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-483


ML110470066     *via email OFFICE NRR/LPL4/PM NRR/LPL4/LA OGC RES/DRA/DEGIB NAME MThadani JBurkhardt MClark* BBeasley* DATE 3/3/11 2/16/11 3/4/11 3/4/11 OFFICE DPR/PGCB/BC RIV/DRS/D NRR/LPL4/BC NRR/LPL4/PM NAME SRosenberg* AVegel MMarkley MThadani DATE 3/4/11 3/7/11 3/7/11 3/7/11}}
ML110470066                                               *via email OFFICE       NRR/LPL4/PM             NRR/LPL4/LA           OGC                   RES/DRA/DEGIB NAME         MThadani               JBurkhardt           MClark*               BBeasley*
DATE         3/3/11                 2/16/11               3/4/11               3/4/11 OFFICE       DPR/PGCB/BC             RIV/DRS/D             NRR/LPL4/BC           NRR/LPL4/PM NAME         SRosenberg*             AVegel               MMarkley             MThadani DATE         3/4/11                 3/7/11               3/7/11               3/7/11}}

Latest revision as of 03:19, 13 November 2019

Response to Legal Counsel for Callaway Plant Ameren Missouri'S Understanding That Lawrence S. Criscione'S Official NRC Duties and Responsibilities Will Not Involve Callaway Matters
ML110470066
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 03/07/2011
From: Thadani M
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Daniel Shapiro
Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP
Thadani, M C, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 415-1476
References
TAC ME4721, FOIA/PA-2011-0103, FOIA/PA-2011-0111, FOIA/PA-2011-0182
Download: ML110470066 (3)
v • d • e


Text

March 7, 2011 Mr. Daryl M. Shapiro Counsel for Union Electric Company Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP 2300 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20037-1122

SUBJECT:

CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 - LEGAL COUNSELS RESPONSE FOR UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY RE: PETITION FILED WITH NRC BY MR. LAWRENCE S. CRISCIONE (TAC NO. ME4721)

Dear Mr. Shapiro:

I am replying to your letter dated January 6, 20111 in which you submitted a response to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRCs) Petition Review Board (PRB) regarding Mr.

Lawrence S. Crisciones petition dated September 17, 2010.

In your written response, you stated that NRC should reject the petition, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206 (10 CFR 2.206) and consistent with NRC Management Directive 8.11, in that the NRC will not review a petition where allegations have already been the subject of NRC Staff review and present no significant new information.

In your letter dated January 6, 2011, you also stated that, One more comment must be made with respect to the Petition. In the Petition, Mr. Criscione uses the first-person "we" to refer to himself and the NRC collectively. Petition at 2. This makes it appear that the Petition was an official NRC communication concerning Callaway and its personnel. Ameren Missouri would like to reiterate and confirm the understanding it has with the NRC that Mr. Criscione's official NRC duties and responsibilities will not involve any matters with respect to Callaway.

On January 19, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)

Accession No. ML110140104), the NRC responded to Mr. Crisciones petition dated September 17, 2010. In that letter, the NRC informed Mr. Criscione that the PRBs final recommendation is that the petition meets rejection criterion III.C.2.b in Management Directive 8.11, Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions, dated July 1, 1999, and revised October 25, 2000. This decision was made based on the determination that no additional relevant information was provided during Mr. Crisciones presentation that had not already been previously reviewed, evaluated, and resolved by the NRC staff.

1 Submitted under 10 CFR 2.390 requesting withholding on the basis the document contains confidential information.

D. Shapiro Concerning your comment regarding Mr. Crisciones NRC duties and responsibilities, Mr.

Crisciones participation with respect to this petition and the NRC PRB was that of a private citizen. The government-wide standards of conduct regulations require NRC employees to disqualify themselves from participating in particular matters involving parties that they know are likely to affect the financial interests of anyone they served, within the last year, as an employee, unless they receive authorization. There are no other legal restrictions on an NRC employees involvement in matters affecting their former employers. The NRC maintains an open, collaborative working environment that encourages all employees to promptly voice differing views, which could include views related to any plant including Callaway.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1476, or e-mail mohan.thadani@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Mohan C. Thadani, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-483

ML110470066 *via email OFFICE NRR/LPL4/PM NRR/LPL4/LA OGC RES/DRA/DEGIB NAME MThadani JBurkhardt MClark* BBeasley*

DATE 3/3/11 2/16/11 3/4/11 3/4/11 OFFICE DPR/PGCB/BC RIV/DRS/D NRR/LPL4/BC NRR/LPL4/PM NAME SRosenberg* AVegel MMarkley MThadani DATE 3/4/11 3/7/11 3/7/11 3/7/11

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML110470066&oldid=2121852"