ML110670378: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML110670378
| number = ML110670378
| issue date = 03/08/2011
| issue date = 03/08/2011
| title = Fort Calhoun, Unit 1 - E-mail to Correct Due Date for Response to Request for Additional Information, Amendment to Relocate Acoustic Position and Tail Pipe Temperature Indication Surveillance Requirements from Technical Specifications (TAC
| title = E-mail to Correct Due Date for Response to Request for Additional Information, Amendment to Relocate Acoustic Position and Tail Pipe Temperature Indication Surveillance Requirements from Technical Specifications
| author name = Wilkins L E
| author name = Wilkins L
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| addressee name = Hansher B, Lippy D L
| addressee name = Hansher B, Lippy D
| addressee affiliation = Omaha Public Power District
| addressee affiliation = Omaha Public Power District
| docket = 05000285
| docket = 05000285
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = TAC:ME4542
| project = TAC:ME4542
| stage = Response to RAI
| stage = RAI
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Wilkins, Lynnea Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 12:43 PM To: LIPPY, DONNA L Cc: HANSHER, BILL R; Burkhardt, Janet; Lent, Susan  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                       Wilkins, Lynnea Sent:                       Tuesday, March 08, 2011 12:43 PM To:                         LIPPY, DONNA L Cc:                         HANSHER, BILL R; Burkhardt, Janet; Lent, Susan


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: RAI for Relocating Operating and SR for PORV Acoustic Position Indication from Tech Specs (TAC No. ME4542)
RE: RAI for Relocating Operating and SR for PORV Acoustic Position Indication from Tech Specs (TAC No. ME4542)
Donna, That is correct. Mr. Hansher indicated that no teleconference was need for the RAIs, therefore a 30 day response time from March 7, 2011 is acceptable.  
: Donna, That is correct. Mr. Hansher indicated that no teleconference was need for the RAIs, therefore a 30 day response time from March 7, 2011 is acceptable.
 
My apologies for the error.
My apologies for the error.
Thanks Lynnea Lynnea Wilkins, Project Manager Fort Calhoun Station, Unit 1 Cooper Nuclear Station Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-1377 From: LIPPY, DONNA L [mailto:dllippy@oppd.com]
Thanks Lynnea Lynnea Wilkins, Project Manager Fort Calhoun Station, Unit 1 Cooper Nuclear Station Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-1377 From: LIPPY, DONNA L [mailto:dllippy@oppd.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 9:56 AM To: Wilkins, Lynnea Cc: HANSHER, BILL R  
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 9:56 AM To: Wilkins, Lynnea Cc: HANSHER, BILL R


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RAI for Relocating Operating and SR for PORV Acoustic Position Indication from Tech Specs (TAC No. ME4542)
RAI for Relocating Operating and SR for PORV Acoustic Position Indication from Tech Specs (TAC No. ME4542)
Lynnea, Good morning. OPPD received the letter dated March 7, 2011, providing three RAIs re:
: Lynnea, Good morning. OPPD received the letter dated March 7, 2011, providing three RAIs re:
the license amendment request to relocate the operating and surveillance requirements for the PORV, safety valve position and tailpipe temperature instrumentation from the Technical Specifications. It appears in the second paragraph of this letter that the response due date information was mimicked from the March 3 rd RAI letter for the relief request (TAC No. ME4541).  
the license amendment request to relocate the operating and surveillance requirements for the PORV, safety valve position and tailpipe temperature instrumentation from the Technical Specifications. It appears in the second paragraph of this letter that the response due date information was mimicked from the March 3rd RAI letter for the relief request (TAC No. ME4541).
 
It is my understanding that there was a phone call on February 24, 2011, between NRC staff and Mr. Bill Hansher and other OPPD staff members to discuss the RAIs for the relief request (TAC No. ME 4541) and it was agreed during the telecom that the relief request RAI response would be returned within 7 days of receipt of the RAIs.
It is my understanding that there was a phone call on February 24, 2011, between NRC staff and Mr. Bill Hansher and other OPPD staff members to discuss the RAIs for the relief request (TAC No. ME 4541) and it was agreed during the telecom that the relief request RAI response would be returned within 7 days of receipt of the RAIs.  
 
However, for the RAIs associated with the license amendment request (TAC No.
However, for the RAIs associated with the license amendment request (TAC No.
ME4542), although Mr. Bill Hansher did discuss this with you during a February 24th phone call, no specific RAI response time was agreed upon, so OPPD was planning to submit within the standard response time of 30 days from receipt of the letter, which is April 5, 2011.
ME4542), although Mr. Bill Hansher did discuss this with you during a February 24th
 
Please confirm that this 30-day response time is acceptable.
 
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
 
Best regards,


Donna Lippy Sr. Nuclear Licensing Engineer 402-533-7358}}
phone call, no specific RAI response time was agreed upon, so OPPD was planning to submit within the standard response time of 30 days from receipt of the letter, which is April 5, 2011.
Please confirm that this 30-day response time is acceptable.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Best regards, Donna Lippy Sr. Nuclear Licensing Engineer 402-533-7358}}

Latest revision as of 03:22, 13 November 2019

E-mail to Correct Due Date for Response to Request for Additional Information, Amendment to Relocate Acoustic Position and Tail Pipe Temperature Indication Surveillance Requirements from Technical Specifications
ML110670378
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 03/08/2011
From: Lynnea Wilkins
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Hansher B, Lippy D
Omaha Public Power District
Wilkins, L E, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 415-1377
References
TAC ME4542
Download: ML110670378 (2)


Text

From: Wilkins, Lynnea Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 12:43 PM To: LIPPY, DONNA L Cc: HANSHER, BILL R; Burkhardt, Janet; Lent, Susan

Subject:

RE: RAI for Relocating Operating and SR for PORV Acoustic Position Indication from Tech Specs (TAC No. ME4542)

Donna, That is correct. Mr. Hansher indicated that no teleconference was need for the RAIs, therefore a 30 day response time from March 7, 2011 is acceptable.

My apologies for the error.

Thanks Lynnea Lynnea Wilkins, Project Manager Fort Calhoun Station, Unit 1 Cooper Nuclear Station Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-1377 From: LIPPY, DONNA L [1]

Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 9:56 AM To: Wilkins, Lynnea Cc: HANSHER, BILL R

Subject:

RAI for Relocating Operating and SR for PORV Acoustic Position Indication from Tech Specs (TAC No. ME4542)

Lynnea, Good morning. OPPD received the letter dated March 7, 2011, providing three RAIs re:

the license amendment request to relocate the operating and surveillance requirements for the PORV, safety valve position and tailpipe temperature instrumentation from the Technical Specifications. It appears in the second paragraph of this letter that the response due date information was mimicked from the March 3rd RAI letter for the relief request (TAC No. ME4541).

It is my understanding that there was a phone call on February 24, 2011, between NRC staff and Mr. Bill Hansher and other OPPD staff members to discuss the RAIs for the relief request (TAC No. ME 4541) and it was agreed during the telecom that the relief request RAI response would be returned within 7 days of receipt of the RAIs.

However, for the RAIs associated with the license amendment request (TAC No.

ME4542), although Mr. Bill Hansher did discuss this with you during a February 24th

phone call, no specific RAI response time was agreed upon, so OPPD was planning to submit within the standard response time of 30 days from receipt of the letter, which is April 5, 2011.

Please confirm that this 30-day response time is acceptable.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Best regards, Donna Lippy Sr. Nuclear Licensing Engineer 402-533-7358