IR 05000275/2011402: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITE D S TATES NUC LEAR RE GULATOR Y C OMMIS SI ON rch 22, 2011 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000275/2011402 AND 05000323/2011402 | |||
==Dear Mr. Conway:== | ==Dear Mr. Conway:== | ||
On March 3, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on March 3, 2011, with you and other members of your staff. | On March 3, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on March 3, 2011, with you and other members of your staff. | ||
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the | The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. | ||
This report documents three NRC-identified findings of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). Additionally, two examples of one licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low security significance are listed in this report. These deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site. However, because of their very low security significance and because these violations were entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating these violations | The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. | ||
This report documents three NRC-identified findings of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process). | |||
Additionally, two examples of one licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low security significance are listed in this report. These deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site. However, because of their very low security significance and because these violations were entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating these violations Pacific Gas and Electric Company -2-as noncited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the NRC Enforcement Policy. If you contest these noncited violations, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 612 E. Lamar Blvd, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas, 76011-4125; the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant. | |||
Additionally, two of the NRC identified findings had crosscutting aspects in the areas of human performance associated with: work control regarding work planning [H.3(a)]; and work practices regarding management oversight [H.4(c)]. If you disagree with the crosscutting aspect assigned to any finding in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at Diablo Canyon Power Plant. | Additionally, two of the NRC identified findings had crosscutting aspects in the areas of human performance associated with: work control regarding work planning [H.3(a)]; and work practices regarding management oversight [H.4(c)]. If you disagree with the crosscutting aspect assigned to any finding in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at Diablo Canyon Power Plant. | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRCs document system, ADAMS. | ||
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letters enclosure will not be available for public inspection. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-Related Information-Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ | /RA/ | ||
Michael P. Shannon, Chief Plant Support Branch-1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-275, 50-323 License Nos.: DPR-80, DPR-82 Pacific Gas and Electric Company -3-Nonpublic Enclosure: | |||
NRC Inspection Report 05000275/2011402 and 05000323/2011402 w/Attachment: | |||
Supplemental Information cc w/enclosure: | |||
Michael Priebe, Security Director Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 56, Mail Station 104/6/601 Avila Beach, CA 93424 cc w/o enclosure: | |||
James R. Becker, Site Vice President Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 56, Mail Station 104/6/601 Avila Beach, CA 93424 Jennifer Post, Esq. | |||
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. | |||
77 Beale Street, Room 2496 Mail Code B30A San Francisco, CA 94120 Pacific Gas and Electric Company -4-Electronic distribution w/enclosure: | |||
Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Michael.Ernstes@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov) Senior Resident Inspector (Michael.Peck@nrc.gov) | Ronald Albert (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN Mail Stop: T-3A5M Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN 3D43 Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov) | ||
Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Michael.Ernstes@nrc.gov) | |||
Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov) | |||
Senior Resident Inspector (Michael.Peck@nrc.gov) | |||
Electronic distribution w/o enclosure: | Electronic distribution w/o enclosure: | ||
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov) Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov) DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) | Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov) | ||
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov) | |||
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) | |||
DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) | DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) | ||
DRS Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov) | DRS Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov) | ||
Branch Chief, DRP/B (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov) | Branch Chief, DRP/B (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov) | ||
Senior Project Engineer, DRP/B (Rick.Deese@nrc.gov) Senior Project Engineer, DRP/B (Leonard.Willoughby@nrc.gov) Project Engineer, DRP/B (Greg.Tutak@nrc.gov) | Senior Project Engineer, DRP/B (Rick.Deese@nrc.gov) | ||
Senior Project Engineer, DRP/B (Leonard.Willoughby@nrc.gov) | |||
Project Engineer, DRP/B (Greg.Tutak@nrc.gov) | |||
Project Engineer, DRP/B (Nestor.Makris@nrc.gov) | Project Engineer, DRP/B (Nestor.Makris@nrc.gov) | ||
DC Administrative Assistant (Agnes.Chan@nrc.gov) | DC Administrative Assistant (Agnes.Chan@nrc.gov) | ||
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov) Project Manager (Alan.Wang@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Michael.Hay@nrc.gov) | Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov) | ||
Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov) | |||
Project Manager (Alan.Wang@nrc.gov) | |||
Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Michael.Hay@nrc.gov) | |||
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov) | RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov) | ||
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov) | Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov) | ||
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov) OEMail Resource OEDO RIV Coordinator (Nathan.Sanfilippo@nrc.gov) | Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov) | ||
OEMail Resource OEDO RIV Coordinator (Nathan.Sanfilippo@nrc.gov) | |||
Security Related Complete Report - OUO: | Security Related Complete Report - OUO: | ||
SUNSI Review Completed: ETB ADAMS: Yes Initials: ETB Non-Publicly Available Sensitive-Security- Related-Periodic Review Required Letter Only: | SUNSI Review Completed: ETB ADAMS: : Yes Initials: ETB | ||
SUNSI Review Completed: ETB ADAMS: Yes Initials: ETB Publicly Available Non-Sensitive SPSI:PSB1 PSI:PSB1 C:PSB1 C:PBB C:PSB1 ETByre JMRollins MPShannon GMiller MPShannon | : Non-Publicly Available : Sensitive-Security- Related-Periodic Review Required Letter Only: | ||
/RA/ /RA//RA//RA//RA/ 3/9/11 3/12/11 3/22/2011 3/22/2011 3/22/2011 | SUNSI Review Completed: ETB ADAMS: : Yes Initials: ETB | ||
: Publicly Available : Non-Sensitive SPSI:PSB1 PSI:PSB1 C:PSB1 C:PBB C:PSB1 ETByre JMRollins MPShannon GMiller MPShannon | |||
/RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ | |||
3/9/11 3/12/11 3/22/2011 3/22/2011 3/22/2011 | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 02:48, 13 November 2019
ML110811329 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Diablo Canyon ![]() |
Issue date: | 03/22/2011 |
From: | Shannon M Plant Support Branch-1 |
To: | Conway J Pacific Gas & Electric Co |
References | |
IR-11-402 | |
Download: ML110811329 (4) | |
Text
UNITE D S TATES NUC LEAR RE GULATOR Y C OMMIS SI ON rch 22, 2011
SUBJECT:
DIABLO CANYON POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000275/2011402 AND 05000323/2011402
Dear Mr. Conway:
On March 3, 2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on March 3, 2011, with you and other members of your staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
This report documents three NRC-identified findings of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process).
Additionally, two examples of one licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low security significance are listed in this report. These deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site. However, because of their very low security significance and because these violations were entered into your corrective action program, the NRC is treating these violations Pacific Gas and Electric Company -2-as noncited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the NRC Enforcement Policy. If you contest these noncited violations, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 612 E. Lamar Blvd, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas, 76011-4125; the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant.
Additionally, two of the NRC identified findings had crosscutting aspects in the areas of human performance associated with: work control regarding work planning H.3(a); and work practices regarding management oversight H.4(c). If you disagree with the crosscutting aspect assigned to any finding in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and the NRC Resident Inspector at Diablo Canyon Power Plant.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRCs document system, ADAMS.
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, because of the security-related concerns contained in the enclosure, and in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, a copy of this letters enclosure will not be available for public inspection.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response, if any. This practice will ensure that your response will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRCs document system, ADAMS. If Safeguards Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, mark your entire response Security-Related Information-Withhold Under 10 CFR 2.390 and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Michael P. Shannon, Chief Plant Support Branch-1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-275, 50-323 License Nos.: DPR-80, DPR-82 Pacific Gas and Electric Company -3-Nonpublic Enclosure:
NRC Inspection Report 05000275/2011402 and 05000323/2011402 w/Attachment:
Supplemental Information cc w/enclosure:
Michael Priebe, Security Director Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 56, Mail Station 104/6/601 Avila Beach, CA 93424 cc w/o enclosure:
James R. Becker, Site Vice President Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 56, Mail Station 104/6/601 Avila Beach, CA 93424 Jennifer Post, Esq.
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
77 Beale Street, Room 2496 Mail Code B30A San Francisco, CA 94120 Pacific Gas and Electric Company -4-Electronic distribution w/enclosure:
Ronald Albert (Ronald.Albert@nrc.gov), Chief, Reactor Security Oversight Branch Shyrl Coker, (Shyrl.Coker@nrc.gov) NSIR/DSO/DDSO, TWFN Mail Stop: T-3A5M Clay Johnson, (Clay.Johnson@nrc.gov), NSIR/DSO/DDSO/SPEB, TWFN 3D43 Branch Chief, RI DRS (James.Trapp@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, RII DRS/PSB2 (Michael.Ernstes@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, RIII DRS/PSB (Richard.Skokowski@nrc.gov)
Senior Resident Inspector (Michael.Peck@nrc.gov)
Electronic distribution w/o enclosure:
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)
DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)
DRS Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, DRP/B (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov)
Senior Project Engineer, DRP/B (Rick.Deese@nrc.gov)
Senior Project Engineer, DRP/B (Leonard.Willoughby@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/B (Greg.Tutak@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/B (Nestor.Makris@nrc.gov)
DC Administrative Assistant (Agnes.Chan@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)
Project Manager (Alan.Wang@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Michael.Hay@nrc.gov)
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)
OEMail Resource OEDO RIV Coordinator (Nathan.Sanfilippo@nrc.gov)
Security Related Complete Report - OUO:
SUNSI Review Completed: ETB ADAMS: : Yes Initials: ETB
- Non-Publicly Available : Sensitive-Security- Related-Periodic Review Required Letter Only:
SUNSI Review Completed: ETB ADAMS: : Yes Initials: ETB
- Publicly Available : Non-Sensitive SPSI:PSB1 PSI:PSB1 C:PSB1 C:PBB C:PSB1 ETByre JMRollins MPShannon GMiller MPShannon
/RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/ /RA/
3/9/11 3/12/11 3/22/2011 3/22/2011 3/22/2011