ML12043A025: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 Davis-BesseNPEm Resource From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 5:04 PM To: dorts@firstenergycorp.com; Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource
{{#Wiki_filter:Davis-BesseNPEm Resource From:                       CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent:                       Monday, January 30, 2012 5:04 PM To:                         dorts@firstenergycorp.com; Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Teleconference Summary for your review Attachments:
Teleconference Summary for your review Attachments:               DB teleconference Summary June 30 2011.docx
DB teleconference Summary June 30 2011.docxSteve, Let me know if you have any comments.  
: Steve, Let me know if you have any comments.
: Regards, Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov 1


Regards, Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Hearing Identifier:     Davis_BesseLicenseRenewal_Saf_NonPublic Email Number:           3481 Mail Envelope Properties     (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D08070CB4BAF)
 
Phone:  301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov
 
Hearing Identifier: Davis_BesseLicenseRenewal_Saf_NonPublic Email Number: 3481   Mail Envelope Properties   (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D08070CB4BAF)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Teleconference Summary for your review Sent Date:   1/30/2012 5:03:56 PM Received Date: 1/30/2012 5:03:58 PM From:   CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Created By:   Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov Recipients:     "dorts@firstenergycorp.com" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com> Tracking Status: None "Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource" <Davis-BesseHearingFile.Resource@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None Post Office:   HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov
Teleconference Summary for your review Sent Date:             1/30/2012 5:03:56 PM Received Date:         1/30/2012 5:03:58 PM From:                   CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Created By:             Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"dorts@firstenergycorp.com" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com>
Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   323     1/30/2012 5:03:58 PM DB teleconference Summary June 30 2011.docx   39020 Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:      
Tracking Status: None "Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource" <Davis-BesseHearingFile.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:           HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files                         Size                     Date & Time MESSAGE                       323                     1/30/2012 5:03:58 PM DB teleconference Summary June 30 2011.docx                         39020 Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:


LICENSEE: FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company  
LICENSEE:       FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company FACILITY:       Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station
 
FACILITY: Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 30, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, CONCERNING REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC. NO. ME4640)  
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 30, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, CONCERNING REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC. NO. ME4640)
 
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC or the applicant) held a telephone conference call on June 30, 2011, to discuss and clarify the applicants responses to the staffs requests for additional information concerning the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station license renewal application. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a description of the staff concerns discussed with the applicant. A brief description on the status of the items is also included.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC or the applicant) held a telephone conference call on June 30, 2011, to discuss and clarify the applicant's responses to the staff's requests for additional information concerning the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station license renewal application.  
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
 
Samuel Cuadrado de Jes&#xfa;s, Project Manager Project Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-346
provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a description of the staff concerns discussed with the applicant. A brief description on the status of the items is also included.  
 
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.  
 
Samuel Cuadrado de Jes&#xfa;s, Project Manager  
 
Project Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-346  


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==


As stated cc w/encls: Listserv  
As stated cc w/encls: Listserv


ML12018a046 OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR BC:RPB1:DLR NAME IKing S Cuadrado de Jes&#xfa;s D Morey DATE 01/25/12 01     /         /12 01      /          /12 ENCLOSURE 1
ML12018a046 OFFICE LA:DLR                   PM:RPB1:DLR                   BC:RPB1:DLR NAME       IKing               S Cuadrado de Jes&#xfa;s           D Morey DATE       01/25/12             01   /       /12             01   /       /12


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JUNE 30, 2011 PARTICIPANTS A FFILIATIONSSamuel Cuadrado de Jes&#xfa;s U.S. Nuclear Re g ulator y Commission (NRC) Robert Sun NRC James Gavula NRC Michelle Kichline NRC John Klos NRC Lane Howard Center for Nuclear Waste and Regulatory Analyses (CNWRA)
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JUNE 30, 2011 PARTICIPANTS               AFFILIATIONS Samuel Cuadrado de Jes&#xfa;s   U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Keith Axle r CNWRAPavan Shukla CNWRA Steve Dort FirstEner gy Nuclear O p eratin g Com p an y (FENOC) Kath y Nesse r FENOC Larr y Hinkle FENOC Allen McAlliste r FENOC
Robert Sun                 NRC James Gavula               NRC Michelle Kichline           NRC John Klos                   NRC Lane Howard                 Center for Nuclear Waste and Regulatory Analyses (CNWRA)
 
Keith Axler                CNWRA Pavan Shukla               CNWRA Steve Dort                 FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC)
ENCLOSURE 2
Kathy Nesser                FENOC Larry Hinkle               FENOC Allen McAllister            FENOC ENCLOSURE 1


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION JUNE 30, 2011  
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION JUNE 30, 2011 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC or the applicant) held a telephone conference call on June 30, 2011, to discuss and clarify the following responses to requests for additional information (RAIs) concerning the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station license renewal application (LRA).
 
Response to RAI B.2.31-1 Discussion:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC or the applicant) held a telephone conference call on June 30, 2011, to discuss and clarify the following responses to requests for additional information (RAIs) concerning the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station license renewal application (LRA).  
The staff stated that the applicants RAI response letter dated May 24, 2011, included a change to the One-Time Inspection (OTI) Program to add management of cracking of copper alloy components exposed to raw water. Initially, the applicant had proposed using the Open-Cycle Cooling Water Program to manage aging for these components. When the staff questioned what inspection method would be used, the applicant responded by changing the aging management program (AMP) to the OTI Program and revised the LRA. The staff stated that this new approach to manage aging for components exposed to a non-consistent environment, such as raw water, using the OTI Program is not consistent with existing staff guidance.
 
The applicant stated that for RAI response B.2.31-1, Table 3.3.2-1, row 99, it will resubmit its response to change this item from an OTI and assign the Inspection of Internal Surfaces Program. FENOC stated that an extent-of-condition review identified that RAI B.2.18-1, Table 3.3.2-14, Rows 77, 85, 88, 100, 131, also need to be changed.
Response to RAI B.2.31-1 Discussion:
Action: It was mutually agreed that the the applicants responses to RAIs B.2.31-1 and B.2.18-1 will be resubmitted to the staff in the upcoming July 20, 2011, RAI response letter.
 
The staff stated that the applicant's RAI response letter dated May 24, 2011, included a change  
 
to the One-Time Inspection (OTI) Program to add management of cracking of copper alloy components exposed to raw water. Initially, the applicant had proposed using the Open-Cycle Cooling Water Program to manage aging for these components. When the staff questioned what inspection method would be used, the applicant responded by changing the aging management program (AMP) to the OTI Program and revised the LRA. The staff stated that this new approach to manage aging for components exposed to a non-consistent environment, such as raw water, using the OTI Program is not consistent with existing staff guidance.  
 
The applicant stated that for RAI response B.2.31-1, Table 3.3.2-1, row 99, it will resubmit its response to change this item from an OTI and assign the Inspection of Internal Surfaces Program. FENOC stated that an extent-of-condition review identified that RAI B.2.18-1, Table 3.3.2-14, Rows 77, 85, 88, 100, 131, also need to be changed.  
 
Action: It was mutually agreed that the the applicant's responses to RAIs B.2.31-1 and B.2.18-1 will be resubmitted to the staff in the upcoming July 20, 2011, RAI response letter.
Elastomers Discussion:
Elastomers Discussion:
The staff stated that, according to Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report AMP XI.M38, for flexible materials to be considered acceptable, the inspection results should indicate that the flexible polymer material is in "as new" condition (e.g., the hardness, flexibility, physical dimensions, and color of the material are unchanged from when the material was new).
The staff stated that, according to Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report AMP XI.M38, for flexible materials to be considered acceptable, the inspection results should indicate that the flexible polymer material is in as new condition (e.g., the hardness, flexibility, physical dimensions, and color of the material are unchanged from when the material was new).
The applicant stated that the term "as new" posed several questions; mainly the term "as new" cannot be quantified or measured nor can it be described or explained in company procedures. The applicant then restated the current acceptance criteria for elastomer inspections. This item was tabled by the NRC, and there are no actions due.
The applicant stated that the term as new posed several questions; mainly the term as new cannot be quantified or measured nor can it be described or explained in company procedures.
 
The applicant then restated the current acceptance criteria for elastomer inspections. This item was tabled by the NRC, and there are no actions due.
Response to RAIs 3.3.2.2.3.3-1 and 3.3.2.71-2
ENCLOSURE 2
 
Discussion: 


Response to RAIs 3.3.2.2.3.3-1 and 3.3.2.71-2 Discussion:
The staff stated that in response to RAIs 3.3.2.2.3.3-1 and 3.3.2.71-2, the applicant is committing to use the plant-specific Inspection of Internal Surfaces in Miscellaneous Piping and Ducting Program to manage cracking due to stress-corrosion cracking of stainless steel diesel engine exhaust piping, piping components, and piping elements exposed to diesel exhaust.
The staff stated that in response to RAIs 3.3.2.2.3.3-1 and 3.3.2.71-2, the applicant is committing to use the plant-specific Inspection of Internal Surfaces in Miscellaneous Piping and Ducting Program to manage cracking due to stress-corrosion cracking of stainless steel diesel engine exhaust piping, piping components, and piping elements exposed to diesel exhaust.
The staff noted that the applicant's proposed AMP relies on opportunistic inspections. The staff stated that the key issue is inspection frequency. The staff also stated that the equivalent AMP (XI.M38) in the GALL Report, Revision 2, does not specify an inspection frequency, instead, recommends a plant-specific inspection frequency based upon operation.
The staff noted that the applicants proposed AMP relies on opportunistic inspections. The staff stated that the key issue is inspection frequency. The staff also stated that the equivalent AMP (XI.M38) in the GALL Report, Revision 2, does not specify an inspection frequency, instead, recommends a plant-specific inspection frequency based upon operation.
This item was tabled by the staff, and there are no actions due.
This item was tabled by the staff, and there are no actions due.
The staff also mentioned that in the applicant's June 3, 2011 response (L-11-166,) a question may arise concerning the "consumable" status of the letdown heat exchangers.  
The staff also mentioned that in the applicants June 3, 2011 response (L-11-166,) a question may arise concerning the consumable status of the letdown heat exchangers.
There was no further discussion and the call was concluded.


There was no further discussion and the call was concluded.
Memorandum to FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company from S. CuadradoDeJesus dated January XX, 2012
Memorandum to FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company from S. CuadradoDeJesus dated January XX, 2012  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 30, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, CONCERNING REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC. NO. ME4640)  
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 30, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, CONCERNING REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC. NO. ME4640)
 
DISTRIBUTION:
DISTRIBUTION:
HARD COPY:
HARD COPY:
DLR RF E-MAIL: PUBLIC [or NON-PUBLIC, if applicable]
DLR RF E-MAIL:
RidsNrrDlr Resource  
PUBLIC [or NON-PUBLIC, if applicable]
 
RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource
RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource  
---------------------
 
PCooper BHarris SCuadrado EMiller MMahoney ICouret, OPA TReilly, OCA BHarris, OGC}}
RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource  
 
RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource  
 
RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource  
 
RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource  
---------------------  
 
PCooper BHarris SCuadrado EMiller MMahoney ICouret, OPA  
 
TReilly, OCA BHarris, OGC}}

Revision as of 09:27, 12 November 2019

2012/01/30 Davis-Besse Lr - Teleconference Summary for Your Review
ML12043A025
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 01/30/2012
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML12043A025 (8)


Text

Davis-BesseNPEm Resource From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 5:04 PM To: dorts@firstenergycorp.com; Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource

Subject:

Teleconference Summary for your review Attachments: DB teleconference Summary June 30 2011.docx

Steve, Let me know if you have any comments.
Regards, Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: Davis_BesseLicenseRenewal_Saf_NonPublic Email Number: 3481 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D08070CB4BAF)

Subject:

Teleconference Summary for your review Sent Date: 1/30/2012 5:03:56 PM Received Date: 1/30/2012 5:03:58 PM From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Created By: Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov Recipients:

"dorts@firstenergycorp.com" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com>

Tracking Status: None "Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource" <Davis-BesseHearingFile.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 323 1/30/2012 5:03:58 PM DB teleconference Summary June 30 2011.docx 39020 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

LICENSEE: FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company FACILITY: Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 30, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, CONCERNING REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC. NO. ME4640)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC or the applicant) held a telephone conference call on June 30, 2011, to discuss and clarify the applicants responses to the staffs requests for additional information concerning the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station license renewal application. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a description of the staff concerns discussed with the applicant. A brief description on the status of the items is also included.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús, Project Manager Project Branch 1 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-346

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/encls: Listserv

ML12018a046 OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RPB1:DLR BC:RPB1:DLR NAME IKing S Cuadrado de Jesús D Morey DATE 01/25/12 01 / /12 01 / /12

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JUNE 30, 2011 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Robert Sun NRC James Gavula NRC Michelle Kichline NRC John Klos NRC Lane Howard Center for Nuclear Waste and Regulatory Analyses (CNWRA)

Keith Axler CNWRA Pavan Shukla CNWRA Steve Dort FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC)

Kathy Nesser FENOC Larry Hinkle FENOC Allen McAllister FENOC ENCLOSURE 1

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION JUNE 30, 2011 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC or the applicant) held a telephone conference call on June 30, 2011, to discuss and clarify the following responses to requests for additional information (RAIs) concerning the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station license renewal application (LRA).

Response to RAI B.2.31-1 Discussion:

The staff stated that the applicants RAI response letter dated May 24, 2011, included a change to the One-Time Inspection (OTI) Program to add management of cracking of copper alloy components exposed to raw water. Initially, the applicant had proposed using the Open-Cycle Cooling Water Program to manage aging for these components. When the staff questioned what inspection method would be used, the applicant responded by changing the aging management program (AMP) to the OTI Program and revised the LRA. The staff stated that this new approach to manage aging for components exposed to a non-consistent environment, such as raw water, using the OTI Program is not consistent with existing staff guidance.

The applicant stated that for RAI response B.2.31-1, Table 3.3.2-1, row 99, it will resubmit its response to change this item from an OTI and assign the Inspection of Internal Surfaces Program. FENOC stated that an extent-of-condition review identified that RAI B.2.18-1, Table 3.3.2-14, Rows 77, 85, 88, 100, 131, also need to be changed.

Action: It was mutually agreed that the the applicants responses to RAIs B.2.31-1 and B.2.18-1 will be resubmitted to the staff in the upcoming July 20, 2011, RAI response letter.

Elastomers Discussion:

The staff stated that, according to Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report AMP XI.M38, for flexible materials to be considered acceptable, the inspection results should indicate that the flexible polymer material is in as new condition (e.g., the hardness, flexibility, physical dimensions, and color of the material are unchanged from when the material was new).

The applicant stated that the term as new posed several questions; mainly the term as new cannot be quantified or measured nor can it be described or explained in company procedures.

The applicant then restated the current acceptance criteria for elastomer inspections. This item was tabled by the NRC, and there are no actions due.

ENCLOSURE 2

Response to RAIs 3.3.2.2.3.3-1 and 3.3.2.71-2 Discussion:

The staff stated that in response to RAIs 3.3.2.2.3.3-1 and 3.3.2.71-2, the applicant is committing to use the plant-specific Inspection of Internal Surfaces in Miscellaneous Piping and Ducting Program to manage cracking due to stress-corrosion cracking of stainless steel diesel engine exhaust piping, piping components, and piping elements exposed to diesel exhaust.

The staff noted that the applicants proposed AMP relies on opportunistic inspections. The staff stated that the key issue is inspection frequency. The staff also stated that the equivalent AMP (XI.M38) in the GALL Report, Revision 2, does not specify an inspection frequency, instead, recommends a plant-specific inspection frequency based upon operation.

This item was tabled by the staff, and there are no actions due.

The staff also mentioned that in the applicants June 3, 2011 response (L-11-166,) a question may arise concerning the consumable status of the letdown heat exchangers.

There was no further discussion and the call was concluded.

Memorandum to FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company from S. CuadradoDeJesus dated January XX, 2012

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 30, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY, CONCERNING REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC. NO. ME4640)

DISTRIBUTION:

HARD COPY:

DLR RF E-MAIL:

PUBLIC [or NON-PUBLIC, if applicable]

RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource


PCooper BHarris SCuadrado EMiller MMahoney ICouret, OPA TReilly, OCA BHarris, OGC