ML12094A203: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:VogtleInitialLicenseEamHighFailreRateVogtle Initial License E x am High Fail u re Rate Issue SummaryIn March and April of 2011, Vogtle 1 & 2 Hot License Class HL-16 took a utility authored NRC license exam.
{{#Wiki_filter:Vogtle Initial License EExam am High Fail Failure re Rate
Seven of ten candidates failed the NRC written exam, oneofthesevenalsofailedtheoperatingtest one of the seven also failed the operating test. Driven by a loss of all exam generation experience at a critical time that was not compensated for rapidly enough by site managementPrevious NRC pass rate has been consistently high Root CauseThe root cause for the high NRC exam failure rate was less than adequate oversight and involvement of the HL-16 initial license class by Vogtle1 & 2 management. UnexpectedlossofallNRCexamdevelopmentgroupexperience&Unexpected loss of all NRC exam development group experience
 
& supervision due to retirementsManagement underestimated the effect of and did not adequately compensate for the loss of training experienceTime pressure on exam development led to inadequate validation and inadequate internal and external review and challenge of the NRC examTraining management did not fully communicate developing issues with the license examination to site management Corrective ActionsExam Development:Exam group fully staffed and stabilizedRecent retired experienced exam developers full time for this exam and for knowledge transfer and mentoringExam team member qualification requires NRC exam writers conference or INPO sponsored exam writer courseCompleted an INPO Assist Visit on the current license class exam development and the development process The current NRC exam was independently reviewed by an experienced fleet lead examiner and an independent industry expert Corrective actions:Management OversightMonthly line and senior management review process includes performance indicators that contain progress on exam development milestones Fleet and site management exam readiness challenges prior to exam submittal and exam administration put in processExam validation scheduling requirements put in processThe Training Manager now reports directly to the Site VP and clear communication expectations establishedThese corrective actions were taken fleet wide Current Class and ExamThere are 22 candidates in the current license class and they are performing wellPractice Audits, actual Audit and the NRC exams were developed with corrective actions in placeAdditional resources, reviews, challenges and validation were utilized on these examsThe NRC Operating and Written exam review is in progress ConclusionHL-16 license Exam was an anomaly compared with previous NRC pass rate for the last 10 yearsDriven by a loss of all exam generation experience at a iilihdfidl cr i t i ca l t ime t hat was not compensate d for rap idl y enough by site managementCauses have been identifiedRigorous and sustainable fleet wide corrective actions have been taken and put in process}}
Issue Summary In March and April of 2011, Vogtle 1 & 2 Hot License Class HL-16 took a utility authored NRC license exam.
Seven of ten candidates failed the NRC written exam, one of the seven also failed the operating test.
test Driven by a loss of all exam generation experience at a critical time that was not compensated for rapidly enough by site management Previous NRC pass rate has been consistently high
 
Root Cause The root cause for the high NRC exam failure rate was less than adequate oversight and involvement of the HL-16 initial license class by Vogtle 1 & 2 management.
y Unexpected loss of all NRC exam development group experience &
supervision due to retirements y Management underestimated the effect of and did not adequately compensate for the loss of training experience y Time pressure on exam development led to inadequate validation and inadequate internal and external review and challenge of the NRC exam y Training management did not fully communicate developing issues with the license examination to site management
 
Corrective Actions Exam Development:
y Exam group fully staffed and stabilized y Recent retired experienced exam developers full time for this exam and for knowledge transfer and mentoring y Exam team member qualification requires NRC exam writers conference or INPO sponsored exam writer course y Completed an INPO Assist Visit on the current license class exam development and the development process y The current NRC exam was independently reviewed by an experienced fleet lead examiner and an independent industry expert
 
Corrective actions:
Management Oversight y Monthly line and senior management review process includes performance indicators that contain progress on exam development milestones y Fleet and site management exam readiness challenges prior to exam submittal and exam administration put in process y Exam validation scheduling requirements put in process y The Training Manager now reports directly to the Site VP and clear communication expectations established y These corrective actions were taken fleet wide
 
Current Class and Exam y There are 22 candidates in the current license class and they are performing well y Practice Audits, actual Audit and the NRC exams were developed with corrective actions in place y Additional resources, reviews, challenges and validation were utilized on these exams y The NRC Operating and Written exam review is in progress
 
Conclusion y HL-16 license Exam was an anomaly compared with previous NRC pass rate for the last 10 years y Driven by a loss of all exam generation experience at a critical i i l time i  that h was not compensated    d ffor rapidly idl enough by site management y Causes have been identified y Rigorous and sustainable fleet wide corrective actions have been taken and put in process}}

Latest revision as of 05:26, 12 November 2019

Public Meeting Licensee Slides - Vogtle Initial License Exam High Failure Rate
ML12094A203
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/02/2012
From:
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/OLB
To:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
References
Download: ML12094A203 (7)
v • d • e


Text

Vogtle Initial License EExam am High Fail Failure re Rate

Issue Summary In March and April of 2011, Vogtle 1 & 2 Hot License Class HL-16 took a utility authored NRC license exam.

Seven of ten candidates failed the NRC written exam, one of the seven also failed the operating test.

test Driven by a loss of all exam generation experience at a critical time that was not compensated for rapidly enough by site management Previous NRC pass rate has been consistently high

Root Cause The root cause for the high NRC exam failure rate was less than adequate oversight and involvement of the HL-16 initial license class by Vogtle 1 & 2 management.

y Unexpected loss of all NRC exam development group experience &

supervision due to retirements y Management underestimated the effect of and did not adequately compensate for the loss of training experience y Time pressure on exam development led to inadequate validation and inadequate internal and external review and challenge of the NRC exam y Training management did not fully communicate developing issues with the license examination to site management

Corrective Actions Exam Development:

y Exam group fully staffed and stabilized y Recent retired experienced exam developers full time for this exam and for knowledge transfer and mentoring y Exam team member qualification requires NRC exam writers conference or INPO sponsored exam writer course y Completed an INPO Assist Visit on the current license class exam development and the development process y The current NRC exam was independently reviewed by an experienced fleet lead examiner and an independent industry expert

Corrective actions:

Management Oversight y Monthly line and senior management review process includes performance indicators that contain progress on exam development milestones y Fleet and site management exam readiness challenges prior to exam submittal and exam administration put in process y Exam validation scheduling requirements put in process y The Training Manager now reports directly to the Site VP and clear communication expectations established y These corrective actions were taken fleet wide

Current Class and Exam y There are 22 candidates in the current license class and they are performing well y Practice Audits, actual Audit and the NRC exams were developed with corrective actions in place y Additional resources, reviews, challenges and validation were utilized on these exams y The NRC Operating and Written exam review is in progress

Conclusion y HL-16 license Exam was an anomaly compared with previous NRC pass rate for the last 10 years y Driven by a loss of all exam generation experience at a critical i i l time i that h was not compensated d ffor rapidly idl enough by site management y Causes have been identified y Rigorous and sustainable fleet wide corrective actions have been taken and put in process

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12094A203&oldid=2102807"