ML14135A509: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Enclosure 1 BSEP 14-0048 Duke Energy Presentation | {{#Wiki_filter:Enclosure 1 BSEP 14-0048 Duke Energy Presentation - Brunswick MELLLA+ Methods Applicability, Pre-Application Meeting, April 17, 2014 | ||
-Brunswick MELLLA+ Methods Applicability, Pre-Application Meeting, April 17, 2014 Brunswick MELLLA+Pre-Application Meeting AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability April 17, 2014 DUKE'~ENERGY. | |||
Brnwc LA+ Mehd Appiablt* Duke Participants | Brunswick MELLLA+ | ||
* Roger Thomas" Bill Murray* Charles Stroupe (Presenter) | Pre-Application Meeting AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability April 17, 2014 DUKE | ||
'~ENERGY. | |||
Brnwc LA+ Mehd Appiablt | |||
* Duke Participants | |||
* AREVA Participants | |||
* Roger Thomas | |||
* Dan Tinkler | |||
" Bill Murray . Alan Meginnis | |||
* Charles Stroupe (Presenter) | |||
* Greg Westmoreland | * Greg Westmoreland | ||
* John Siphers | * John Siphers mmK 2 | ||
* Fuel and plant licensing analysis strategy* AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability Summary DUKE ENERY. | Agenda | ||
* During B1C21 refueling outage Spring | " Schedule | ||
* Benefits of MELLLA+* Approach to fuel and licensing analysis strategies | * Introduction and Objectives | ||
* Thermal hydraulic stability solution (AREVA's Enhanced Option Ill)* Containment Accident Pressure (CAP)* Anticipated Transient Without SCRAM analysis* MELLLA+ impacts* Several follow up pre-application meetings were proposed.* The NRC requested "The licensee should justify the use and applicability of the GEH generic MELLLA+ LTR to the AREVA approaches and the use of AREVA fuel assemblies." (ML13016A014) | * Fuel and plant licensing analysis strategy | ||
DUKE 5 ENERGY. | * AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability Summary DUKE 3 ENERY. | ||
Schedule | |||
* MELLLA+ LAR submittal (both Units) Fall 2014 | |||
* B1C19 sample problem with ATRIUMTM 1OXM | |||
" B1C21 cycle specific application results to NRC December 2015 | |||
* First planned MELLLA+ cycle | |||
" MELLLA+ requested approval (both Units) Spring 2016 | |||
* MELLLA+ implementation | |||
* During B1C21 refueling outage Spring 2016 | |||
-* DLUKE 4 ENERGY. | |||
On January 8, 2013 Duke energy presented a pre-application meeting with the NRC. (ML13007A373) | |||
* Benefits of MELLLA+ | |||
* Approach to fuel and licensing analysis strategies | |||
* Thermal hydraulic stability solution (AREVA's Enhanced Option Ill) | |||
* Containment Accident Pressure (CAP) | |||
* Anticipated Transient Without SCRAM analysis | |||
* MELLLA+ impacts | |||
* Several follow up pre-application meetings were proposed. | |||
* The NRC requested "The licensee should justify the use and applicability of the GEH generic MELLLA+ LTR to the AREVA approaches and the use of AREVA fuel assemblies." | |||
(ML13016A014) | |||
DUKE 5 ENERGY. | |||
* On 8/20/13 a pre-application meeting was conducted which focused primarily on GEH methods applicability to AREVA fuel (ML13327A037 and ML13327A038) | * On 8/20/13 a pre-application meeting was conducted which focused primarily on GEH methods applicability to AREVA fuel (ML13327A037 and ML13327A038) | ||
GEH A10XM Core Modeling* GEH ATWS A1OXM Modeling* Overview of AREVA Methods Applicability Report* Today's meeting will provide more detail on AREVA's methods applicability to BSEP MELLLA+ conditions DUKE 6 " ENERGY. | GEH A10XM Core Modeling | ||
Introduction and Objectives MELLLA+ overview...... .. . | * GEH ATWS A1OXM Modeling | ||
* All topical areas of the MELLLA+ LTR will be addressed in the LAR* Duke Energy will address: " SAR Integration of GEH and AREVA input" APRM and Enhanced Option III setpoints and implementation" Risk evaluation, procedure updates, operator training" Plant changes to mitigate ATWS (SLC B-1 0 enrichment increase)" Selected non-fuel impacts 8DUKE ENERGY. | * Overview of AREVA Methods Applicability Report | ||
* GEH MELLLA+ LTR process (NEDC-33006P-A) with GEH methodologies and analyses will address: " Non-fuel impacts" Long term ATWS and ATWS instability explicitly modeling ATRIUMTM 1OXM fuel 9 DUKE 9 '~ENERGY. | * Today's meeting will provide more detail on AREVA's methods applicability to BSEP MELLLA+ conditions DUKE 6 " ENERGY. | ||
Fuel Iplan strteg* AREVA methodologies and analyses will address:* Fuel, core design, COLR fuel limits, LOCA, DBA* ATWS and ASME overpressure" Enhanced Option III (EO-Ill) stability solution 10 | |||
* AREVA will present information on methods applicability to the BSEP" AREVA will provide a methods applicability report specific to BSEP MELLLA+ conditions" Enhanced Option III" AREVA application of fuel specific limitations and conditions from the generic MELLLA+ topical NEDO-33006A 1XDKE 11 t~ ENERGY. | Introduction and Objectives MELLLA+ overview | ||
* AREVA proprietary presentation will be given at this point in the presentation 12DKE | ... .. | ||
* AREVA methods are applicable to Brunswick MELLLA+conditions | .... | ||
* Methods applicability report will be submitted with LAR* Steady state and transient neutronic and thermal-hydraulic analytical methods and code systems supporting MELLLA+ will be applied within NRC approved applicability ranges 4 The assessment database and uncertainty of models used to simulate the plant response at MELLLA+ conditions are equivalent to core and assembly conditions for which the AREVA methodology was benchmarked | I Brunswick MELLLA+ Power Flow Map 120.0 110.0 100.0 90.0 80.0 e-" i-LL9A_+ R g o M | ||
* AREVA analyses will comply with the fuel-specific limitations and conditions from the generic MELLLA+ SE to NEDO-33006A DiKE 13 t ENERGY. | 70.0 MELLL Line 60.0 50.0 40.0 *" \7 , | ||
Brnwc LA+ Mtos. Applcablit Questions? | 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 7.7 15.4 23.1 30.8 38.5 46.2 53.9 61.6 69.3 77.0 84.7 92.4 Mlbs/hr Core Flow 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 % Core Flow DUKE 7 ' ENERGY. | ||
@ENERGY. | * All topical areas of the MELLLA+ LTR will be addressed in the LAR | ||
* Duke Energy will address: | |||
I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit. | " SAR Integration of GEH and AREVA input | ||
: 2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA to determine whether certain AREVA information is proprietary. | " APRM and Enhanced Option III setpoints and implementation | ||
I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA to ensure the proper application of these criteria.3. I am familiar with the AREVA information contained in the presentation entitled, "AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability," dated April 17, 2014 and referred to herein as "Document." Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information. | " Risk evaluation, procedure updates, operator training | ||
" Plant changes to mitigate ATWS (SLC B-1 0 enrichment increase) | |||
" Selected non-fuel impacts 8DUKE ENERGY. | |||
* GEH MELLLA+ LTR process (NEDC-33006P-A) with GEH methodologies and analyses will address: | |||
" Non-fuel impacts | |||
" Long term ATWS and ATWS instability explicitly modeling ATRIUMTM 1OXM fuel 9 DUKE 9 '~ENERGY. | |||
Fuel *and* Iplan licensing* an*alysi strteg | |||
* AREVA methodologies and analyses will address: | |||
* Fuel, core design, COLR fuel limits, LOCA, DBA | |||
* ATWS and ASME overpressure | |||
" Enhanced Option III (EO-Ill) stability solution 10 *DUKE ENERGY. | |||
10 | |||
* AREVA will present information on methods applicability to the BSEP | |||
" AREVA will provide a methods applicability report specific to BSEP MELLLA+ conditions | |||
" Enhanced Option III | |||
" AREVA application of fuel specific limitations and conditions from the generic MELLLA+ topical NEDO-33006A 1XDKE 11 t~ ENERGY. | |||
* AREVA proprietary presentation will be given at this point in the presentation 12DKE ENERGY. | |||
12 | |||
* AREVA methods are applicable to Brunswick MELLLA+ | |||
conditions | |||
* Methods applicability report will be submitted with LAR | |||
* Steady state and transient neutronic and thermal-hydraulic analytical methods and code systems supporting MELLLA+ will be applied within NRC approved applicability ranges 4 The assessment database and uncertainty of models used to simulate the plant response at MELLLA+ conditions are equivalent to core and assembly conditions for which the AREVA methodology was benchmarked | |||
* AREVA analyses will comply with the fuel-specific limitations and conditions from the generic MELLLA+ SE to NEDO-33006A DiKE 13 t ENERGY. | |||
Brnwc LA+ Mtos. Applcablit Questions? | |||
14 | |||
@ENERGY. | |||
Selected Acronyms ASME -American Society of Mechanical Engineers LOCA - Loss of Coolant Analysis ATWS -Anticipated Transient Without Scram LTR - License Topical Report BSEP - Brunswick Steam Electric Plant MELLLA- Maximum Extended Load Line Limit CAP - Containment Accident Pressure Analysis COLR - Core Operating Limits Report MELLLA+ - Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus DBA - Design Basis Accidents SAR - Safety Analysis Report EO-Ill - Enhanced Option III SE - Safety Evaluation GEH - General Electric Hitachi SLC - Standby Liquid Control LAR - License Amendment Request | |||
~tENERGY. | |||
15 | |||
Enclosure 3 BSEP 14-0048 AREVA Affidavit Regarding Withholding Presentation on AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability | |||
AFFIDAVIT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) | |||
) ss. | |||
COUNTY OF BENTON ) | |||
: 1. My name is Alan B. Meginnis. I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit. | |||
: 2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA to determine whether certain AREVA information is proprietary. I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA to ensure the proper application of these criteria. | |||
: 3. I am familiar with the AREVA information contained in the presentation entitled, "AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability," dated April 17, 2014 and referred to herein as "Document." Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information. | |||
: 4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA and not made available to the public. Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential. | : 4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA and not made available to the public. Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential. | ||
: 5. This Document has been made available to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure. | : 5. This Document has been made available to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure. The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is | ||
The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information." 6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: (a) The information reveals details of AREVA's research and development plans and programs or their results.(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA.(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA in product optimization or marketability.(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA.The information in the Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(d) and 6(e) above.7. In accordance with AREVA's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document have been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information. | |||
: 8. AREVA policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis. | requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information." | ||
: 9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.SUBSCRIBED before me this / 0 1 4-day of -,2014..: U-O r,, Susan K. McCoy " 2 NGTON NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF WAS-TGTON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 1/14/2016}} | : 6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary: | ||
(a) The information reveals details of AREVA's research and development plans and programs or their results. | |||
(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service. | |||
(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA. | |||
(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA in product optimization or marketability. | |||
(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA. | |||
The information in the Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(d) and 6(e) above. | |||
: 7. In accordance with AREVA's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document have been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information. | |||
: 8. AREVA policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis. | |||
: 9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. | |||
SUBSCRIBED before me this / 0 1 4-day of - ,2014. | |||
.: U | |||
-O r,, | |||
Susan K. McCoy " 2 NGTON NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF WAS-TGTON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 1/14/2016}} |
Revision as of 05:23, 4 November 2019
ML14135A509 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Brunswick ![]() |
Issue date: | 04/17/2014 |
From: | Duke Energy Carolinas |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
Shared Package | |
ML14136A059 | List: |
References | |
BSEP 14-0048 | |
Download: ML14135A509 (20) | |
Text
Enclosure 1 BSEP 14-0048 Duke Energy Presentation - Brunswick MELLLA+ Methods Applicability, Pre-Application Meeting, April 17, 2014
Brunswick MELLLA+
Pre-Application Meeting AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability April 17, 2014 DUKE
'~ENERGY.
Brnwc LA+ Mehd Appiablt
- Duke Participants
- AREVA Participants
- Roger Thomas
- Dan Tinkler
" Bill Murray . Alan Meginnis
- Charles Stroupe (Presenter)
- Greg Westmoreland
- John Siphers mmK 2
Agenda
" Schedule
- Introduction and Objectives
- Fuel and plant licensing analysis strategy
- AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability Summary DUKE 3 ENERY.
Schedule
- MELLLA+ LAR submittal (both Units) Fall 2014
- B1C19 sample problem with ATRIUMTM 1OXM
" B1C21 cycle specific application results to NRC December 2015
- First planned MELLLA+ cycle
" MELLLA+ requested approval (both Units) Spring 2016
- MELLLA+ implementation
- During B1C21 refueling outage Spring 2016
-* DLUKE 4 ENERGY.
On January 8, 2013 Duke energy presented a pre-application meeting with the NRC. (ML13007A373)
- Benefits of MELLLA+
- Approach to fuel and licensing analysis strategies
- Thermal hydraulic stability solution (AREVA's Enhanced Option Ill)
- Containment Accident Pressure (CAP)
- MELLLA+ impacts
- Several follow up pre-application meetings were proposed.
- The NRC requested "The licensee should justify the use and applicability of the GEH generic MELLLA+ LTR to the AREVA approaches and the use of AREVA fuel assemblies."
DUKE 5 ENERGY.
- On 8/20/13 a pre-application meeting was conducted which focused primarily on GEH methods applicability to AREVA fuel (ML13327A037 and ML13327A038)
GEH A10XM Core Modeling
- Overview of AREVA Methods Applicability Report
- Today's meeting will provide more detail on AREVA's methods applicability to BSEP MELLLA+ conditions DUKE 6 " ENERGY.
Introduction and Objectives MELLLA+ overview
... ..
....
I Brunswick MELLLA+ Power Flow Map 120.0 110.0 100.0 90.0 80.0 e-" i-LL9A_+ R g o M
70.0 MELLL Line 60.0 50.0 40.0 *" \7 ,
30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 7.7 15.4 23.1 30.8 38.5 46.2 53.9 61.6 69.3 77.0 84.7 92.4 Mlbs/hr Core Flow 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 % Core Flow DUKE 7 ' ENERGY.
- Duke Energy will address:
" SAR Integration of GEH and AREVA input
" APRM and Enhanced Option III setpoints and implementation
" Risk evaluation, procedure updates, operator training
" Plant changes to mitigate ATWS (SLC B-1 0 enrichment increase)
" Selected non-fuel impacts 8DUKE ENERGY.
- GEH MELLLA+ LTR process (NEDC-33006P-A) with GEH methodologies and analyses will address:
" Non-fuel impacts
" Long term ATWS and ATWS instability explicitly modeling ATRIUMTM 1OXM fuel 9 DUKE 9 '~ENERGY.
Fuel *and* Iplan licensing* an*alysi strteg
- AREVA methodologies and analyses will address:
" Enhanced Option III (EO-Ill) stability solution 10 *DUKE ENERGY.
10
- AREVA will present information on methods applicability to the BSEP
" AREVA will provide a methods applicability report specific to BSEP MELLLA+ conditions
" Enhanced Option III
" AREVA application of fuel specific limitations and conditions from the generic MELLLA+ topical NEDO-33006A 1XDKE 11 t~ ENERGY.
- AREVA proprietary presentation will be given at this point in the presentation 12DKE ENERGY.
12
- AREVA methods are applicable to Brunswick MELLLA+
conditions
- Methods applicability report will be submitted with LAR
- Steady state and transient neutronic and thermal-hydraulic analytical methods and code systems supporting MELLLA+ will be applied within NRC approved applicability ranges 4 The assessment database and uncertainty of models used to simulate the plant response at MELLLA+ conditions are equivalent to core and assembly conditions for which the AREVA methodology was benchmarked
- AREVA analyses will comply with the fuel-specific limitations and conditions from the generic MELLLA+ SE to NEDO-33006A DiKE 13 t ENERGY.
Brnwc LA+ Mtos. Applcablit Questions?
14
@ENERGY.
Selected Acronyms ASME -American Society of Mechanical Engineers LOCA - Loss of Coolant Analysis ATWS -Anticipated Transient Without Scram LTR - License Topical Report BSEP - Brunswick Steam Electric Plant MELLLA- Maximum Extended Load Line Limit CAP - Containment Accident Pressure Analysis COLR - Core Operating Limits Report MELLLA+ - Maximum Extended Load Line Limit Analysis Plus DBA - Design Basis Accidents SAR - Safety Analysis Report EO-Ill - Enhanced Option III SE - Safety Evaluation GEH - General Electric Hitachi SLC - Standby Liquid Control LAR - License Amendment Request
~tENERGY.
15
Enclosure 3 BSEP 14-0048 AREVA Affidavit Regarding Withholding Presentation on AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability
AFFIDAVIT STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF BENTON )
- 1. My name is Alan B. Meginnis. I am Manager, Product Licensing, for AREVA Inc. and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.
- 2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by AREVA to determine whether certain AREVA information is proprietary. I am familiar with the policies established by AREVA to ensure the proper application of these criteria.
- 3. I am familiar with the AREVA information contained in the presentation entitled, "AREVA MELLLA+ Methods Applicability," dated April 17, 2014 and referred to herein as "Document." Information contained in this Document has been classified by AREVA as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by AREVA for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.
- 4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by AREVA and not made available to the public. Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.
- 5. This Document has been made available to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in this Document be withheld from public disclosure. The request for withholding of proprietary information is made in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390. The information for which withholding from disclosure is
requested qualifies under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) "Trade secrets and commercial or financial information."
- 6. The following criteria are customarily applied by AREVA to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary:
(a) The information reveals details of AREVA's research and development plans and programs or their results.
(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.
(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for AREVA.
(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for AREVA in product optimization or marketability.
(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by AREVA, would be helpful to competitors to AREVA, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of AREVA.
The information in the Document is considered proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs 6(b), 6(d) and 6(e) above.
- 7. In accordance with AREVA's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document have been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside AREVA only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.
- 8. AREVA policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.
- 9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
SUBSCRIBED before me this / 0 1 4-day of - ,2014.
.: U
-O r,,
Susan K. McCoy " 2 NGTON NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF WAS-TGTON MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 1/14/2016