|
|
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | issue date = 11/12/2014 | | | issue date = 11/12/2014 |
| | title = E-mail Re. Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 - RAIs - Degraded Voltage Relay Issue | | | title = E-mail Re. Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 - RAIs - Degraded Voltage Relay Issue |
| | author name = Miernicki M J | | | author name = Miernicki M |
| | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB | | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPWB |
| | addressee name = Arent G, Bryan R H, Stroud R A | | | addressee name = Arent G, Bryan R, Stroud R |
| | addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority | | | addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority |
| | docket = 05000391 | | | docket = 05000391 |
Line 15: |
Line 15: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:From: Sent: To: Cc: | | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Miernicki, Michael Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:45 PM To: garent@tva.gov; rhbryan@tva.gov; Stroud, Russell Allen Cc: Zimmerman, Jacob; Quichocho, Jessie; Poole, Justin; Mathew, Roy; Matharu, Gurcharan; Lingam, Siva; Schaaf, Robert |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| | Watts Bar 2 - RAis - Degraded Voltage Relay Issue Attachments: Watts Bar DVR RAis Finalll-12-2014.docx Attached please find final RAis from the Electrical Engineering Branch regarding the Watts Bar 2 Degraded Voltage Relay issue as discussed on 11/5/14 during the audit, and clarified on the 11/12/14 telecon.. Please acknowledge receipt of these questions, and that they contain no proprietary information. |
| | Mike Michael J. Miernicki Sr. Project Manager NRC/NRR/DORL/LP-WB 301-415-2304 1 |
| | |
| | WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 (WBN-2) REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CHAPTER 8, "ELECTRICAL POWER"- SUPPLEMENTAL SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT (SSER 22, OPEN ITEM 30) |
| | (TAC NO. ME2731) |
| | The staff of the Electrical Engineering Branch (EEEB) of the Division of Engineering is reviewing the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) response to the NRC staffs request for additional information regarding the Degraded Voltage Relay (DVR) Settings. |
| | The requirements for degraded voltage protection originate from the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, "General Design Criteria (GDC) 17." Following the July 1976, event at Millstone involving degraded voltage conditions in the plant auxiliary systems, the NRC required all licensees to install degraded voltage protection systems as described in NRC Letter dated June 2, 1977, "Statement of Staff Positions Relative to Emergency Power Systems for Operating Reactors." Further, in Generic Letter (GL) 79-36, "Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution Systems Voltages," the NRC required all licensees, including Watts Bar, to review the electric power systems to determine analytically if, assuming all onsite sources of AC power are not available, the offsite power system and the onsite distribution system is of sufficient capacity and capability to automatically start as well as operate all required safety loads. |
| | For plants under construction, the requirements of the June 2, 1977, letter and staff guidance described in GL 79-36 were incorporated in NUREG-0800, "Standard Review Plan (SRP) for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants," Appendix 8-A, "Branch Technical Position (BTP) PSB-1: Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages," Rev. 2 (07/1981) which is part of the licensing basis for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant. SRP BTP PSB-1 Position 1.a states that the selection of undervoltage and time delay setpoints for the degraded voltage relays shall be determined from an analysis of the voltage requirements of the Class 1E loads. |
| | In addition, in Generic letter (GL) 2006-02, "Grid Reliability and the Impact on Plant Risk and the Operability of Offsite Power," staff defines sufficient voltage from offsite power source as generally related to the degraded voltage relay setpoints. An 'operable' offsite power system indicates compliance with GDC 17 requirements. |
| | Also, the NRC issued Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) RIS 11-12, "Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages," Revision 1, to clarify the NRC staff's technical position on existing regulatory requirements. Specifically, this RIS clarifies voltage studies necessary for Degraded Voltage Relay (second level undervoltage protection) setting bases and Transmission Network/Offsite/Station electric power system design bases for meeting the regulatory requirements specified in GDC 17 to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A. |
| | Since voltage afforded by the degraded voltage relay setpoint was not shown to be adequate to satisfy the voltage requirements of Class 1E motors, the existing calculation did not satisfy its stated objective of demonstrating conformance to BTP PSB-1 and 1977 NRC letter staff position B.1.a. In order to complete this review and prepare the supplement safety evaluation input, the staff requests additional information from the licensee, as described below: |
| | : 1. Describe the analysis that was performed and the methodology used to demonstrate that for the worst-case design basis operating configuration, the existing DVR analytical limit (drop-out) of 6555 volts is adequate to automatically start as well as operate all required safety-related loads thus meeting the NRC staff positions established in SRP |
| | |
| | BTP PSB-1 and comply with the requirements of GDC 17 concerning offsite power source. |
| | : 2. If the analysis concludes that all safety-related loads cannot perform their intended safety functions, while relying on offsite power, at the DVR analytical limit of 6555 volts for the worst-case design basis operating configuration, identify the loads that are affected, the required safety function and explain the consequences of their failure to perform the intended safety functions .. In addition, provide all design basis operating configurations that TVA can demonstrate that all safety-related loads can perform their intended safety functions at the DVR analytical limit of 6555 volts. |
| | : 3. WBN design requires a minimum of 432V on the 480V busses to satisfactorily mitigate the consequences of a design basis event coupled with degraded voltage conditions. |
| | The analytical studies indicate that the 480V board voltage may result in a voltage lower than the required 432V during medium voltage motor starts. The analyses assumes that either: |
| | : a. The grid is sufficiently viable to allow recovery to the Degraded Voltage Drop out value (6555}, within 5 seconds the 480V system voltage will recover to greater than 432 Volts, OR |
| | : b. If the voltage does not reach the DVR drop out, then the voltage is inconsequential since it will result in a transfer to the DGs. |
| | Given that the 5 second limitation is related to plant operation on offsite power, explain the rationale for statement (b) above, whereby the plant may be on a degraded offsite power source for more than 5 seconds until transfer to the onsite power system. |
| | : 4. Please provide the minimum grid voltage range(s) for the offsite power source(s) to be considered available and operable in accordance with the Plant Technical Specifications requirements and GL 2006-002 guidance. Also, provide the corresponding required minimum offsite power source voltage at the 6.9 kV safety-related buses for it to be considered available and operable. If the DVR analytical voltage limit is not the basis for the operability, provide technical and regulatory basis for not changing the existing analytical limit specified for the DVR. |
| | : 5. Confirm that Watts Bar Units 1 and 2 will maintain the compliance with guidance provided in GL 2006- 02 concerning the use of protocols between the nuclear power plant and the transmission system operator (TSO) to determine the operability of offsite power systems under plant technical specifications requirements. In addition, describe the design basis requirements that will be established for dual unit operation at Watts Bar and the agreement that will be established between the Watts Bar Units and the grid operator to ensure that offsite power system has adequate capacity and capability to meet the GDC 17 requirements. |
| | : 6. TVA Nuclear (TVAN) provided additional information in letter dated January 31, 2007 (ADAMS ML070330051) to supplement the responses to questions 1 and 5 in in GL 2006-02. The response to question 1 states "The DVR dropout point is based on the minimum safety buss voltage that provides adequate voltage to required safety loads |
|
| |
|
| Attachments:
| | during worst-case loading conditions." Please provide an explanation for this statement based on the definition for operability of offsite power sources provided in GL 2006-02. |
| Miernicki, Michael Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:45 PM garent@tva.gov; rhbryan@tva.gov; Stroud, Russell Allen Zimmerman, Jacob; Quichocho, Jessie; Poole, Justin; Mathew, Roy; Matharu, Gurcharan; Lingam, Siva; Schaaf, Robert Watts Bar 2 -RAis -Degraded Voltage Relay Issue Watts Bar DVR RAis Finalll-12-2014.docx Attached please find final RAis from the Electrical Engineering Branch regarding the Watts Bar 2 Degraded Voltage Relay issue as discussed on 11/5/14 during the audit, and clarified on the 11/12/14 telecon..
| |
| Please acknowledge receipt of these questions, and that they contain no proprietary information.
| |
| Mike Michael J. Miernicki Sr. Project Manager NRC/NRR/DORL/LP-WB 301-415-2304 1
| |
| WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 (WBN-2) REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CHAPTER 8, "ELECTRICAL POWER"-SUPPLEMENTAL SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT (SSER 22, OPEN ITEM 30) (TAC NO. ME2731) The staff of the Electrical Engineering Branch (EEEB) of the Division of Engineering is reviewing the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) response to the NRC staffs request for additional information regarding the Degraded Voltage Relay (DVR) Settings.
| |
| The requirements for degraded voltage protection originate from the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, "General Design Criteria (GDC) 17." Following the July 1976, event at Millstone involving degraded voltage conditions in the plant auxiliary
| |
| : systems, the NRC required all licensees to install degraded voltage protection systems as described in NRC Letter dated June 2, 1977, "Statement of Staff Positions Relative to Emergency Power Systems for Operating Reactors."
| |
| : Further, in Generic Letter (GL) 79-36, "Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution Systems Voltages,"
| |
| the NRC required all licensees, including Watts Bar, to review the electric power systems to determine analytically if, assuming all onsite sources of AC power are not available, the offsite power system and the onsite distribution system is of sufficient capacity and capability to automatically start as well as operate all required safety loads. For plants under construction, the requirements of the June 2, 1977, letter and staff guidance described in GL 79-36 were incorporated in NUREG-0800, "Standard Review Plan (SRP) for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants,"
| |
| Appendix 8-A, "Branch Technical Position (BTP) PSB-1: Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages,"
| |
| Rev. 2 (07/1981) which is part of the licensing basis for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant. SRP BTP PSB-1 Position 1.a states that the selection of undervoltage and time delay setpoints for the degraded voltage relays shall be determined from an analysis of the voltage requirements of the Class 1 E loads. In addition, in Generic letter (GL) 2006-02, "Grid Reliability and the Impact on Plant Risk and the Operability of Offsite Power," staff defines sufficient voltage from offsite power source as generally related to the degraded voltage relay setpoints.
| |
| An 'operable' offsite power system indicates compliance with GDC 17 requirements.
| |
| Also, the NRC issued Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) RIS 11-12, "Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages,"
| |
| Revision 1, to clarify the NRC staff's technical position on existing regulatory requirements.
| |
| Specifically, this RIS clarifies voltage studies necessary for Degraded Voltage Relay (second level undervoltage protection) setting bases and Transmission Network/Offsite/Station electric power system design bases for meeting the regulatory requirements specified in GDC 17 to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A. Since voltage afforded by the degraded voltage relay setpoint was not shown to be adequate to satisfy the voltage requirements of Class 1 E motors, the existing calculation did not satisfy its stated objective of demonstrating conformance to BTP PSB-1 and 1977 NRC letter staff position B.1.a. In order to complete this review and prepare the supplement safety evaluation input, the staff requests additional information from the licensee, as described below: 1. Describe the analysis that was performed and the methodology used to demonstrate that for the worst-case design basis operating configuration, the existing DVR analytical limit (drop-out) of 6555 volts is adequate to automatically start as well as operate all required safety-related loads thus meeting the NRC staff positions established in SRP BTP PSB-1 and comply with the requirements of GDC 17 concerning offsite power source. 2. If the analysis concludes that all safety-related loads cannot perform their intended safety functions, while relying on offsite power, at the DVR analytical limit of 6555 volts for the worst-case design basis operating configuration, identify the loads that are affected, the required safety function and explain the consequences of their failure to perform the intended safety functions
| |
| .. In addition, provide all design basis operating configurations that TVA can demonstrate that all safety-related loads can perform their intended safety functions at the DVR analytical limit of 6555 volts. 3. WBN design requires a minimum of 432V on the 480V busses to satisfactorily mitigate the consequences of a design basis event coupled with degraded voltage conditions.
| |
| The analytical studies indicate that the 480V board voltage may result in a voltage lower than the required 432V during medium voltage motor starts. The analyses assumes that either: a. The grid is sufficiently viable to allow recovery to the Degraded Voltage Drop out value (6555}, within 5 seconds the 480V system voltage will recover to greater than 432 Volts, OR b. If the voltage does not reach the DVR drop out, then the voltage is inconsequential since it will result in a transfer to the DGs. Given that the 5 second limitation is related to plant operation on offsite power, explain the rationale for statement (b) above, whereby the plant may be on a degraded offsite power source for more than 5 seconds until transfer to the onsite power system. 4. Please provide the minimum grid voltage range(s) for the offsite power source(s) to be considered available and operable in accordance with the Plant Technical Specifications requirements and GL 2006-002 guidance.
| |
| Also, provide the corresponding required minimum offsite power source voltage at the 6.9 kV safety-related buses for it to be considered available and operable.
| |
| If the DVR analytical voltage limit is not the basis for the operability, provide technical and regulatory basis for not changing the existing analytical limit specified for the DVR. 5. Confirm that Watts Bar Units 1 and 2 will maintain the compliance with guidance provided in GL 2006-02 concerning the use of protocols between the nuclear power plant and the transmission system operator (TSO) to determine the operability of offsite power systems under plant technical specifications requirements.
| |
| In addition, describe the design basis requirements that will be established for dual unit operation at Watts Bar and the agreement that will be established between the Watts Bar Units and the grid operator to ensure that offsite power system has adequate capacity and capability to meet the GDC 17 requirements.
| |
| : 6. TVA Nuclear (TVAN) provided additional information in letter dated January 31, 2007 (ADAMS ML070330051) to supplement the responses to questions 1 and 5 in in GL 2006-02.
| |
| The response to question 1 states "The DVR dropout point is based on the minimum safety buss voltage that provides adequate voltage to required safety loads during worst-case loading conditions."
| |
| Please provide an explanation for this statement based on the definition for operability of offsite power sources provided in GL 2006-02. | |
| : 7. Please describe the plant operating and alarm response procedures, control room alarms and indications available to the operator to monitor the offsite power system availability and operability and take the required actions in accordance with plant operating and alarm response procedures.}} | | : 7. Please describe the plant operating and alarm response procedures, control room alarms and indications available to the operator to monitor the offsite power system availability and operability and take the required actions in accordance with plant operating and alarm response procedures.}} |
|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24309A0552024-11-0101 November 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - TVA LAR to Revised Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Re TS Table 3.3.2-1, Function 5 ML24304A3752024-10-29029 October 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request (LAR) to Revise Watts Bar Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) for Hydrologic Analysis ML24274A2762024-09-24024 September 2024 Email from K.Green to S.Hughes, Audit Plan Related to Review of the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Hydrologic LAR to Revise the UFSAR ML24260A0322024-09-10010 September 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Regarding the Watts Bar Unit 2 Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report for U2R5 ML24215A3152024-07-24024 July 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-276-A, Revision 2 TS 3.8.1, AC Sources ML24177A1412024-06-11011 June 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Audit Plan Related to Review of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, LAR to Revise Technical Specification Table 3.3.2-1 Function 5 ML24157A3152024-06-0303 June 2024 2024 Sequoyah Commercial Grade Dedication Inspection Information Request ML24155A1372024-05-29029 May 2024 Email from K. Green to S. Hughes Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request to Revise Residual Heat Removal Flow Rate ML24156A0062024-05-22022 May 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, License Amendment Request to Recapture Low-Power Testing Time ML24130A0132024-05-0707 May 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.7.11 for MCR Chiller Completion Time ML24123A0882024-05-0202 May 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Correction Acceptance Review Results for the Browns Ferry, Sequoyah, and Watts Bar License Amendment Request to Revise TS 5.4.1 or 5.7.1 (L-2024-LLA-0039) ML24122B4872024-04-30030 April 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for the Browns Ferry, Sequoyah, and Watts Bar License Amendment Request to Revise TS 5.4.1 or 5.7.1 (L-2024-LLA-0039) ML24082A0662024-04-17017 April 2024 Email to Stuart Rymer on Exemption Decision for Watts Bar ML24116A2012024-04-17017 April 2024 Nrctva ISFSI CBS (RFI) ML24082A0682024-04-10010 April 2024 Email to Stuart Rymer Re_ Availability of EA-FONSI for Watts Bar ML24100A8392024-04-0909 April 2024 Response from State of Tn Regarding Review of Environmental Assessment for Watts Bar Exemption Request ML24100A8402024-04-0808 April 2024 Email to State of Tn Requesting Review of Environmental Assessment for Watts Bar Exemption Request ML24071A0982024-03-0707 March 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Audit Plan Related to Review of the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification Surveillance Requirement 3.9.5.1 to Reduce RHR Flow Rate ML24058A0962024-02-26026 February 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant License Amendment Request to Revise UFSAR for Hydrologic Analysis ML24047A2792024-02-15015 February 2024 RAI Related to the Exemption Request for 10 CFR 37.11 ML24045A0312024-02-14014 February 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Related to the Exemption Request for the 10 CFR Part 73 Enhanced Weapons Rule ML24033A0562024-02-0101 February 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Correction Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-427-A, Revision 2 Regarding Degraded Barriers ML24036A0132024-01-23023 January 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Sequoyah and Watts Bar Nuclear Plants, License Amendment Request to Revise TS Table 3.3.2-1, Function 5, Turbine Trip and Feedwater Isolation ML24022A2592024-01-22022 January 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, License Amendment Request to Revise TS LCO 3.8.2 to Remove Note C-S Diesel Generator ML24016A0762024-01-16016 January 2024 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request to Rebaseline of Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the Technical Specifications ML23347A0642023-12-13013 December 2023 12-13-23 Email from Kimberly Green to Wells, Russell, Subject: Results of NRC SUNSI Review of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Dual-Unit UFSAR, Amendment 5 ML23334A0932023-11-28028 November 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise TS Surveillance Requirement 3.9.5.1 to Reduce RHR Flow Rate During Mode 6 ML23319A1662023-11-0202 November 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Exemption Request Related to 10 CFR 37.11(c)(2) ML23254A2872023-09-11011 September 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise TS Table 1.1-1 Re Number of Required Rvh Closure Bolts ML23236A2562023-08-24024 August 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for the Sequoyah and Watts Bar License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-567 (L-2023-LLA-0106) ML23191A8672023-07-10010 July 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-501-A, Revision 1, Relocate Stored Fuel Oil and Lube Oil Volume Values to Licensee Control ML23166A1142023-06-15015 June 2023 Document Request for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant - Radiation Protection Inspection - Inspection Report 2023-03 ML23150A2472023-05-25025 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Audit Plan Related to Review of the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Increase the Number of Tritium Producing Burnable Absorber Rods ML23116A1492023-04-21021 April 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Increase the Number of Tritium Producing Burnable Absorber Rods ML23075A0032023-03-13013 March 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar, Units 1, 2, and 3, License Amendment Request to Revise TS 3.7.11, Required Actions A.1 and E.1 Footnotes Re Date for the Modification ML23072A0722023-03-10010 March 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) State Consultation - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.4.12 (L-2022-LLA-0103) ML23067A2372023-03-0808 March 2023 WB_2023-02_RP_inspection_doc_request ML23013A0362023-01-12012 January 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) State Consultation for Alabama - Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2 and 3; Sequoyah, Units 1 and 2; and Watts Bar, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-554-A, Revision 1 (L-2022-LLA-0100) ML23013A0382023-01-12012 January 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) State Consultation for Alabama - Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2 and 3; Sequoyah, Units 1 and 2; and Watts Bar, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-529, Revision 4 (L-2022-LLA-0088) ML22356A2982022-12-22022 December 2022 Email Response to Letter, Dated November 22, 2022 Regarding Watts Bar Integrated Inspection Report ML22353A0812022-12-15015 December 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Watts Bar, Unit 2, Alternative Request WBN-2-ISI-01 Regarding Examination of Upper Head Injection Nozzle Dissimilar Metal Piping Butt Welds ML22348A0972022-12-14014 December 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - State Consultation - Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2 and 3; Sequoyah, Units 1 and 2; and Watts Bar, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-529, Revision 4 (L-2022-LLA-0088) ML22348A0442022-12-13013 December 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - State Consultation - Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2 and 3; Sequoyah, Units 1 and 2; and Watts Bar, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-554-A, Revision 1 (L-2022-LLA-0100) ML22343A0692022-12-0808 December 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.4.12 (L-2022-LLA-0103) ML22227A0712022-08-15015 August 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Sequoyah and Watts Bar License Amendment Request to Revise TS 3.4.12 (EPID L-2022-LLA-0103) - Corrected ML22227A0262022-08-12012 August 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for Sequoyah and Watts Bar License Amendment Request to Revise TS 3.4.12 ML22227A0272022-08-11011 August 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Request for Additional Information Related to Alternative Requests RP-11 for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and IST-RR-9 for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 ML22215A2752022-08-0303 August 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for TVA Fleet License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-554 ML22194A8762022-07-13013 July 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results for TVA Fleet License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-529 ML22166A4292022-06-0606 June 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - LAR to Adopt TSTF-577 2024-09-24
[Table view] Category:Safety Evaluation Report
MONTHYEARML23122A2322023-06-0707 June 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 162 and 69 Regarding Change to Date in Footnotes for Technical Specification 3.7.11, Control Room Emergency Air Temperature Control System (Creatcs) CNL-15-063, Supplement Safety Evaluation Report - Open Item 33 - Completion of Dcns 53421 and 546362015-04-0707 April 2015 Supplement Safety Evaluation Report - Open Item 33 - Completion of Dcns 53421 and 54636 ML14365A0482014-11-12012 November 2014 E-mail Re. Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 - RAIs - Degraded Voltage Relay Issue ML13213A1942013-07-25025 July 2013 Status of Regulatory Framework for the Completion of Construction and Licensing for Unit 2 - Revision 10 (TAC No. MD6311), and Status of Generic Communications for Unit 2 - Revision 10 ML13205A1362013-06-30030 June 2013 NUREG-0847 Supp 26 Safety Evaluation Report Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 ML12011A0242011-11-30030 November 2011 NUREG-0847, Supp. 25, Safety Evaluation Report, Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 ML11277A1482011-09-30030 September 2011 NUREG-0847 Supp 24 Safety Evaluation Report Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2. ML11206A4992011-06-30030 June 2011 NUREG-0847 Supp 23, Safety Evaluation Report, Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2. ML11161A1282011-06-0707 June 2011 Safety Evaluation Report Supplement 22 (Sser 22) - Second Response to NRC Required Action Items ML0905707412009-02-28028 February 2009 NUREG-0847, Supp. 21, Safety Evaluation Report, Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 ML0816200432008-06-30030 June 2008 Issuance of Amendment Regarding Reactor Trip System and Engineered Safety Features Actuation System Completion Times, Bypass Test Times, and Surveillance Test Intervals ML0331100912003-10-23023 October 2003 Submittal of Revision 3 to Ice Condenser Utility Group Topical Report No. ICUG-001: Application of the Active Ice Mass Management Concept to the Ice Condenser Ice Mass Technical Specification ML0312600102003-05-0606 May 2003 Draft Safety Evaluation, Ice Condenser Utility Group Topical Report No. ICUG-001, Revision O 2023-06-07
[Table view] |
Text
From: Miernicki, Michael Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:45 PM To: garent@tva.gov; rhbryan@tva.gov; Stroud, Russell Allen Cc: Zimmerman, Jacob; Quichocho, Jessie; Poole, Justin; Mathew, Roy; Matharu, Gurcharan; Lingam, Siva; Schaaf, Robert
Subject:
Watts Bar 2 - RAis - Degraded Voltage Relay Issue Attachments: Watts Bar DVR RAis Finalll-12-2014.docx Attached please find final RAis from the Electrical Engineering Branch regarding the Watts Bar 2 Degraded Voltage Relay issue as discussed on 11/5/14 during the audit, and clarified on the 11/12/14 telecon.. Please acknowledge receipt of these questions, and that they contain no proprietary information.
Mike Michael J. Miernicki Sr. Project Manager NRC/NRR/DORL/LP-WB 301-415-2304 1
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 (WBN-2) REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING CHAPTER 8, "ELECTRICAL POWER"- SUPPLEMENTAL SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT (SSER 22, OPEN ITEM 30)
(TAC NO. ME2731)
The staff of the Electrical Engineering Branch (EEEB) of the Division of Engineering is reviewing the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) response to the NRC staffs request for additional information regarding the Degraded Voltage Relay (DVR) Settings.
The requirements for degraded voltage protection originate from the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, "General Design Criteria (GDC) 17." Following the July 1976, event at Millstone involving degraded voltage conditions in the plant auxiliary systems, the NRC required all licensees to install degraded voltage protection systems as described in NRC Letter dated June 2, 1977, "Statement of Staff Positions Relative to Emergency Power Systems for Operating Reactors." Further, in Generic Letter (GL) 79-36, "Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution Systems Voltages," the NRC required all licensees, including Watts Bar, to review the electric power systems to determine analytically if, assuming all onsite sources of AC power are not available, the offsite power system and the onsite distribution system is of sufficient capacity and capability to automatically start as well as operate all required safety loads.
For plants under construction, the requirements of the June 2, 1977, letter and staff guidance described in GL 79-36 were incorporated in NUREG-0800, "Standard Review Plan (SRP) for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants," Appendix 8-A, "Branch Technical Position (BTP) PSB-1: Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages," Rev. 2 (07/1981) which is part of the licensing basis for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant. SRP BTP PSB-1 Position 1.a states that the selection of undervoltage and time delay setpoints for the degraded voltage relays shall be determined from an analysis of the voltage requirements of the Class 1E loads.
In addition, in Generic letter (GL) 2006-02, "Grid Reliability and the Impact on Plant Risk and the Operability of Offsite Power," staff defines sufficient voltage from offsite power source as generally related to the degraded voltage relay setpoints. An 'operable' offsite power system indicates compliance with GDC 17 requirements.
Also, the NRC issued Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) RIS 11-12, "Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages," Revision 1, to clarify the NRC staff's technical position on existing regulatory requirements. Specifically, this RIS clarifies voltage studies necessary for Degraded Voltage Relay (second level undervoltage protection) setting bases and Transmission Network/Offsite/Station electric power system design bases for meeting the regulatory requirements specified in GDC 17 to 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A.
Since voltage afforded by the degraded voltage relay setpoint was not shown to be adequate to satisfy the voltage requirements of Class 1E motors, the existing calculation did not satisfy its stated objective of demonstrating conformance to BTP PSB-1 and 1977 NRC letter staff position B.1.a. In order to complete this review and prepare the supplement safety evaluation input, the staff requests additional information from the licensee, as described below:
- 1. Describe the analysis that was performed and the methodology used to demonstrate that for the worst-case design basis operating configuration, the existing DVR analytical limit (drop-out) of 6555 volts is adequate to automatically start as well as operate all required safety-related loads thus meeting the NRC staff positions established in SRP
BTP PSB-1 and comply with the requirements of GDC 17 concerning offsite power source.
- 2. If the analysis concludes that all safety-related loads cannot perform their intended safety functions, while relying on offsite power, at the DVR analytical limit of 6555 volts for the worst-case design basis operating configuration, identify the loads that are affected, the required safety function and explain the consequences of their failure to perform the intended safety functions .. In addition, provide all design basis operating configurations that TVA can demonstrate that all safety-related loads can perform their intended safety functions at the DVR analytical limit of 6555 volts.
- 3. WBN design requires a minimum of 432V on the 480V busses to satisfactorily mitigate the consequences of a design basis event coupled with degraded voltage conditions.
The analytical studies indicate that the 480V board voltage may result in a voltage lower than the required 432V during medium voltage motor starts. The analyses assumes that either:
- a. The grid is sufficiently viable to allow recovery to the Degraded Voltage Drop out value (6555}, within 5 seconds the 480V system voltage will recover to greater than 432 Volts, OR
- b. If the voltage does not reach the DVR drop out, then the voltage is inconsequential since it will result in a transfer to the DGs.
Given that the 5 second limitation is related to plant operation on offsite power, explain the rationale for statement (b) above, whereby the plant may be on a degraded offsite power source for more than 5 seconds until transfer to the onsite power system.
- 4. Please provide the minimum grid voltage range(s) for the offsite power source(s) to be considered available and operable in accordance with the Plant Technical Specifications requirements and GL 2006-002 guidance. Also, provide the corresponding required minimum offsite power source voltage at the 6.9 kV safety-related buses for it to be considered available and operable. If the DVR analytical voltage limit is not the basis for the operability, provide technical and regulatory basis for not changing the existing analytical limit specified for the DVR.
- 5. Confirm that Watts Bar Units 1 and 2 will maintain the compliance with guidance provided in GL 2006- 02 concerning the use of protocols between the nuclear power plant and the transmission system operator (TSO) to determine the operability of offsite power systems under plant technical specifications requirements. In addition, describe the design basis requirements that will be established for dual unit operation at Watts Bar and the agreement that will be established between the Watts Bar Units and the grid operator to ensure that offsite power system has adequate capacity and capability to meet the GDC 17 requirements.
- 6. TVA Nuclear (TVAN) provided additional information in letter dated January 31, 2007 (ADAMS ML070330051) to supplement the responses to questions 1 and 5 in in GL 2006-02. The response to question 1 states "The DVR dropout point is based on the minimum safety buss voltage that provides adequate voltage to required safety loads
during worst-case loading conditions." Please provide an explanation for this statement based on the definition for operability of offsite power sources provided in GL 2006-02.
- 7. Please describe the plant operating and alarm response procedures, control room alarms and indications available to the operator to monitor the offsite power system availability and operability and take the required actions in accordance with plant operating and alarm response procedures.